RE: [lro] Roverdrive vs. High Ratio Transfer Box

From: Todd Schlemmer (nullman@centurytel.net)
Date: Thu Mar 06 2003 - 11:45:16 EST

Next message: Todd Schlemmer: "RE: [lro] propshaft uj-s3"

Previous message: Simon Harding: "[lro] Roverdrive vs. High Ratio transfer Box"
In reply to: KURT W. KRAUSS: "[lro] Roverdrive vs. High Ratio Transfer Box"
Next in thread: Peter Ogilvie: "Re: [lro] Roverdrive vs. High Ratio Transfer Box"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hi Kurt

I have a Roverdrive on OZF (it's great, I love it, etc, yada yada). The
installations should be a mostly bolt-up operation, with a couple of
exceptions:

You will need a 2" hole on the right side of the transmission tunnel for the
engagement lever. Which you may already have...
Some vehicle have clearance issues with the hand brake shaft. Fix is to
heat and bend out of the way, I believe.

The biggest problem I ran into was the getting the durn coupling to mesh
with the main shaft. Very tight clearances there, I think Ray has built a
little more wiggle into the current batches.

If I can tell you more, lemmeno

Todd Schlemmer
Vashon Island, WA
www.ozedeph.com
_______________________________________________
LRO mailing list
LRO@land-rover.team.net
http://land-rover.team.net/mailman/listinfo/lro

Next message: Todd Schlemmer: "RE: [lro] propshaft uj-s3"
Previous message: Simon Harding: "[lro] Roverdrive vs. High Ratio transfer Box"
In reply to: KURT W. KRAUSS: "[lro] Roverdrive vs. High Ratio Transfer Box"
Next in thread: Peter Ogilvie: "Re: [lro] Roverdrive vs. High Ratio Transfer Box"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Mar 06 2003 - 13:22:05 EST