Re: [lro] LWB Series III or IIa?

From: John (johng@kiltfart.org)
Date: Thu Feb 20 2003 - 12:20:52 EST

Next message: John B: "[lro] Starters"

Previous message: David Scheidt: "Re: [lro] LWB Series III or IIa?"
In reply to: Mark Pilkington: "Re: [lro] LWB Series III or IIa?"
Next in thread: Jim Blair: "Re: [lro] LWB Series III or IIa?"
Next in thread: Tackley, John: "RE: [lro] Wanted: old RR in Alberta"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Take one Australian - shove a Kilt on him.
Take one Canadian - shove a Kilt on him.
Add beer and music (and about 30 friends at a house warming party).
Kiltfart was born.

John Gordon
(yes I enjoy a beer...or a Guinness if available)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark Pilkington" <mark@skywagons.com>
To: <lro@koan.team.net>
Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 9:20 AM
Subject: Re: [lro] LWB Series III or IIa?

>
> More to the point, Why "Kiltfart" in your e-mail address.
> Mark Pilkington
_______________________________________________
LRO mailing list
LRO@land-rover.team.net
http://land-rover.team.net/mailman/listinfo/lro

Next message: John B: "[lro] Starters"
Previous message: David Scheidt: "Re: [lro] LWB Series III or IIa?"
In reply to: Mark Pilkington: "Re: [lro] LWB Series III or IIa?"
Next in thread: Jim Blair: "Re: [lro] LWB Series III or IIa?"
Next in thread: Tackley, John: "RE: [lro] Wanted: old RR in Alberta"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Feb 20 2003 - 13:58:45 EST