Re: [lro] LWB Series III or IIa?

From: Jim Blair (ceratos@shaw.ca)
Date: Thu Feb 20 2003 - 12:22:16 EST

  • Next message: John B: "[lro] re New Starter"

    At 08:11 AM 2/20/2003 -0700, you wrote:

    >... if I have my choice of a LWB SIII or a LWB SIIa what are
    >the upsides/faults of either one? I'm finding these to be the more
    >accessable vehicle to purchase.

    Either is fine. Other than the tranny (which, while not as robust as an
    SIIa, is still apparently stronger than many of it's competitors), the
    differences appear to be cosmetic, and minor at that.

    Running lights, side lights on some, interior bits, front grill, etc. All
    easily replaced or removed if ya don't like em (including the tranny, from
    what I hear). Hmmm....not sure about replacing the dash though....anyone
    have an opinion on that one? I have a nice 73 SIII, but the multi-piece
    plastic dash certainly makes gauge work tricky. I'd love to replace it
    with a simple IIa dash if possible. Possibly more trouble than it's worth
    though.

    I've never thought of the SIII as being less rugged or simple (at least not
    the early SIII's), just a bit more "accessorized". I've also never really
    considered the early SIII and the later SIIa as "different trucks". It's
    like Land Rover bolted on some trim and a synchro tranny and called the new
    SIIa an SIII.

    Love my SIII, no regrets here. But I'd also grab a decent SIIa in a
    heartbeat (as a friend for the SIII, not a replacement!).

    Jim Blair
    Seriously "Tarted Up" 73 SIII.
    _______________________________________________
    LRO mailing list
    LRO@land-rover.team.net
    http://land-rover.team.net/mailman/listinfo/lro



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Feb 20 2003 - 14:06:25 EST