Re: [lro] LWB Series III or IIa?

From: David Scheidt (dmschei@attglobal.net)
Date: Thu Feb 20 2003 - 12:06:14 EST

Next message: John: "Re: [lro] LWB Series III or IIa?"

Previous message: Elam, Gerry (CORP): "[lro] SIIA bulkheads for sale"
In reply to: Alan J. Richer: "Re: [lro] LWB Series III or IIa?"
Next in thread: Mark Pilkington: "Re: [lro] LWB Series III or IIa?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

>Mechanically, S.IIIs have a full-synchro transmission -
>easier to shift but considered weaker than its IIa and
>earlier counterpart. The III will also likely have

I've been told that the later SIII trannies are much stronger than
the earlier ones; at least on the level of the IIA. Any truth to
that?
_______________________________________________
LRO mailing list
LRO@land-rover.team.net
http://land-rover.team.net/mailman/listinfo/lro

Next message: John: "Re: [lro] LWB Series III or IIa?"
Previous message: Elam, Gerry (CORP): "[lro] SIIA bulkheads for sale"
In reply to: Alan J. Richer: "Re: [lro] LWB Series III or IIa?"
Next in thread: Mark Pilkington: "Re: [lro] LWB Series III or IIa?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Feb 20 2003 - 13:44:31 EST