Shall I handle this one, lads?
Hi Bowy, I saw your post on the POR board. I've done many of the
modifications you were discussing, my 1966 109 3 door has a spring over
suspension, 900R16 tires, and a few other modifications.
Contrary to the guys on the POR board said, spring overs are tough. There's
a lot more involved than people realise, and I'd definitely recommend
against it if you aren't a very good fabricator and have some engineering
background to help you figure it out. They look pretty easy when you think
about it, but it's a lot of head scratching custom fabrication.
900X16's are big tires, and I think that they are going to tax the heck out
of your motor, and raise your gearing. If you must run those big tires, your
best bet will be to lower the spring mounts on the chassis a couple of
inches, to get some lift, and fit military shackles. 1 ton rovers had this
tire size from the factory, however, they are geared very low (via a special
transfer case) and are extremely slow on the road. You will probably have to
trim your bodywork a bit, which isn't too hard to do so it looks decent.
The other thing you can do is bring your springs to a spring shop and have
them re-arch them for a couple of inches extra. They can usually do with
with good results. With 2"of springs and 2" from the hangers you should have
enough room to run the big tires.
I'd recommend against a body lift. They won't help you much for frame
clearance and they just look wrong on a Land-Rover. By the time you factor
in the labour involved in making all the little brackets and figuring out
all the details, you'll be better off with the spring/mount modification.
Anyways, good luck...
J-L
----- Original Message -----
From: Bowy . <bowy12@hotmail.com>
To: <lro@koan.team.net>
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 12:45 PM
Subject: [lro] Thoughts about low budget lifting.... a series
>
> Hi guys
>
> Yesterday my chassis broke down right in the middle after jacking it up
> under the crossmember. Ik knew my chassis wasn't is such a good shape but
> this bad.....
>
> So now I'am going to put a new chassis under my IIa SWB. And thinking
about
> a body lift, now I'am at it. This because my mcreary superlug 9.00x16 (93
cm
> tall) tires don't fit now. (they rub the inner sides of my panels.)
>
> I've already got longer shackles fit and my leafsprings are ok. I think I
> can fit longer dumb iron on the front of my leafs, like a airportable 109.
> I asked a question about lifting and everything on the UK forums but there
> nobody actually knows a lot about it, I thought maybe you guys can help
me
> out?
> Now Im thinking about two lifting options
> On my previous s****ki samur*i the body lift wasn't difficult but how
> difficult is this on a landie?? Anyone experience? I'am thinking of buying
a
> piece of square tube and cut it in pieces and wel it on the chassis
between
> the de body/bulkhead and the chassis
>
> O, high center of gravity isn't a problem for me. I live in Holland were
> everything is very flat and the only real difficulty we encounter is very
> deeeeeeep ruts from tractors and so in the kley.
>
> I was actually thinking about lifting only the body 2 inch and leaving the
> engine alone. Lowering my radiator (not a very big problem I think)
> The biggest problem is (trough my eyes) the steering part, I want to leave
> the steering relay on its place and just move the steering box up or am I
> thinking to easy of this? (for the record , mine is a LHD so no problems
> with the battery mounting).
>
> The reason I don't want to go for a rework on my panels. I want to keep it
a
> bit original looking. I dont want to go to a SOA, I think this is a bit
to
> complicated.. Ive never even seen this in Holland.
>
> The other solution for more tire clearance is:
> Maybe lowering the shock mountings is also posibility for me. I've already
> got longer shackles fit and my leafsprings are ok. I think I can fit
longer
> dumb iron on the front of my leafs, like a airportable 109. and in the
rear
> too together with dislocating my rear axle to the rear,for two inch or so,
> so it will sit in the middle for more clearance and ability to maintain
> normal propshaft length with the Salisbury. (longer nose than rover)
> The reason why Iam going through al these solutions is , I am a student
(so
> no money. ) . Thats the reason not going for parabolics (yet..)
>
> .....
>
> I'l have to think about my options:
> I figured out the pro's and con's....
>
>
> - Dumb iron/spring mounts lowering
> easy?
> not very expensive
> enough lift
>
> - SOA
> most work
> most expensive
> more lift then I need
>
> - Body lift
> least work I think...
> Very cheap......
> Just enough lift
>
> Anybody sugestions?
>
> Hope one of you experts can help me out here. Or give advice!
>
> Sorry for my lousy typing I'am from the Netherlands.
>
> Greetz Bowy
>
> Series IIa '64 camel, fitted with: pto winch, 9.00 x 16, salisbury, cage.
>
>
>
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> MSN Zoeken, voor duidelijke zoekresultaten!
> http://search.msn.nl/worldwide.asp
> _______________________________________________
> LRO mailing list
> LRO@land-rover.team.net
> http://land-rover.team.net/mailman/listinfo/lro
_______________________________________________
LRO mailing list
LRO@land-rover.team.net
http://land-rover.team.net/mailman/listinfo/lro
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Jan 16 2003 - 13:25:55 EST