Re: LRO: uh oh, Jim's at it again...

From: Zaxcoinc@aol.com
Date: Sat May 05 2001 - 14:21:25 EDT

  • Next message: Jim Hall: "Re: LRO: uh oh, Jim's at it again..."

    In a message dated 5/5/01 11:17:38 AM Pacific Daylight Time, jimfoo@qwest.net
    writes:

    > No, that's why the can overlap. They can actually expand .019" but the
    > gap will "close" at .009"
    >
    >

    That sounds a good bit better, and I've often seen rings like that. Much more
    common to run them at straight or nearly cuts. To check the end gap, you're
    testing them in the bore right? Is the .019" at the
    specified range?

    Zack
    Sounds like you're on to it.



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat May 05 2001 - 15:34:48 EDT