Re: LRO: uh oh, Jim's at it again...

From: Jim Hall (jimfoo@qwest.net)
Date: Sat May 05 2001 - 14:15:01 EDT

Next message: Jim Hall: "Re: LRO: uh oh, Jim's at it again..."

Previous message: Zaxcoinc@aol.com: "Re: LRO: uh oh, Jim's at it again..."
In reply to: Zaxcoinc@aol.com: "Re: LRO: uh oh, Jim's at it again..."
Next in thread: Zaxcoinc@aol.com: "Re: LRO: uh oh, Jim's at it again..."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

No, that's why the can overlap. They can actually expand .019" but the
gap will "close" at .009"

Zaxcoinc@aol.com wrote:
> If they expand more than .009 and become gapless rings they will
break. Then they will be bore scoring devices, instead of rings.

All this because I believe you're talking about piston compression
rings.
That so?

Zack

-- 
Jim Hall
1966 88" Elephant Chaser
http://www.users.qwest.net/~jimfoo
"You know, I never really damaged my Rover 'till I started wheeling 
with Jim." Mitch Stockdale

Next message: Jim Hall: "Re: LRO: uh oh, Jim's at it again..."
Previous message: Zaxcoinc@aol.com: "Re: LRO: uh oh, Jim's at it again..."
In reply to: Zaxcoinc@aol.com: "Re: LRO: uh oh, Jim's at it again..."
Next in thread: Zaxcoinc@aol.com: "Re: LRO: uh oh, Jim's at it again..."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat May 05 2001 - 15:43:00 EDT