LRO: Re: Axles

From: Lonn Howard (hoops@owt.com)
Date: Thu Apr 26 2001 - 21:32:00 EDT

  • Next message: Jean-Leon Morin: "Re: LRO: Axles"

    Hey J-L,

    I have stomped and romped pretty hard on my stock front axle, both on grabby
    hard-pack and on sand. I figured that if I was going to grenade something
    it would be best to try do it close to home. Since most of the time I am
    off-roading in the middle of nowhere I am very conservative with the power,
    but around home I'll push it to the limits. So far, no problems with the
    stock front axles.

    I spoke with Timm recently and he has moved on to a bigger and badder front
    axle. He is now running a Salisbury front axle with bigger brake disks than
    he was running on the stock front axle. Given the wildman-behind-the-wheel
    driving style I have seen Timm exhibit with no ensuing axle failures, I
    figure my stock front axle should be OK.

    The turning radius was decreased with the wider offset wheels, and it looks
    like I could even screw in the wheel stops a bit more to further improve
    things.

    All of that said, I would still like to beef up the front diff just to be
    safer.

    Lonn

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "Jean-Leon Morin" <offroaddesign@softhome.net>
    To: <lro@works.team.net>
    Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2001 12:56 PM
    Subject: LRO: Axles

    > As some of you may know, I have been looking into the possibility of
    > changing over to late model Dana axles, modified to fit the series rover's
    > width. I just got a bit of bad news as narrowing the axleshafts costs a
    lot
    > when you are dealing with such an imposing axleshaft.
    >
    > I am reconsidering the whole idea in a big way. This e mail is primarily
    > addressed to Lonn, and TeriAnn, but others always seem to have interesting
    > insights and ideas, so that's why I am mass-mailing it.
    >
    > Most conversions I have heard of are running a salisbury differential in
    the
    > rear. This appears to be a very tough diff, perfectly capable of handling
    a
    > stout V8 or, in my case, a large 6 cylinder. This is common knowledge. If
    I
    > do stick with rover axles, I'll be going to a salisbury at the rear, and a
    > rover at the front.
    >
    > What I'm worried about is the front diff. How is this end of the equation
    > holding up? Lonn and TeriAnn are using bone stock front axles,and I
    haven't
    > heard of any breakages... yet.
    >
    > TeriAnn, you even have a Quaife (sp?) diff lock in the front, and, the
    > stocker axleshafts are holding up nicely, considering that you have quite
    a
    > bit of weight in the Green Rover, and power to boot. Lonn has a lot of
    > power, and a whole lot of tire to spin, but yet seems to have evaded
    > breakages.
    >
    > Well, here goes. Is it safe to assume that the front axleshafts are
    capable
    > of handling a fair amount of abuse? I realise the rear ones are put to the
    > test in daily driving, and the front see limited strain IE only off-road,
    > but it seems that they are OK for pretty hard off-road use. As far as I
    can
    > tell, Timm Cooper's rock crawling rig has a stock rover axle (except for
    > brakes) up front, and I can pretty much bet that Mr 5+ howler monkey would
    > have a front salisbury under there if it was needed.
    >
    > I've heard of broken half shafts up front, but they seem to be a little
    less
    > common than rear axleshaft breakage. Maybe the front carnage can be
    > attributed to ? years of hard use, and simply failed. Opinions on this?
    >
    > Lonn, how is the turning radius with your new wheels and tires? Better or
    > worse than the old tire/wheel combination?
    >
    >
    > Lots of questions, sorry everyone.
    >
    > ______________________________________________________
    > Jean-Leon Morin
    > AKA "Dr. Detroit"
    >
    > Valdez - 1966 IIA 109 freak
    > Slagmobile - 195? II parts bin
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Apr 26 2001 - 21:32:00 EDT