Re: LRO: Re: Hand cranking and engine swaps

From: TeriAnn Wakeman (twakeman@cruzers.com)
Date: Thu Apr 12 2001 - 10:26:56 EDT

  • Next message: TeriAnn Wakeman: "Re: LRO: The great shock debate (U-bolts)"

    >Compression is the bane of hand-cranking. I would have really liked
    >to retain the ability to hand-crank my 109 after the conversion, but
    >the reality is that it would take two strong men and a boy to crank my
    >10.25:1 compression V8. (can you say "Fill 'er up with Premium"?)
    >You gain some things, and lose others when you change engines.

    You know in the 20 years I had a 2.25 engine in my LR I never once had
    occasion to use the hand crank. So I do not miss it in the slightest.

    Not being obsesed with raw power like Lonn & some others are ( I think 3X
    the rated 2.25L HP is acceptable performance), I ended up with the low
    compression version of the 302. And yes I can say "Fill'er up with
    regular please".

    And I can also look the coiler Land Rover owners straight and the eye and
    say "Is that all the fuel milage you get? And you only have how much
    HP?". I can almost do it with a straight face.

    And yes I can say hybrid

    TeriAnn Wakeman Marigold Ltd.
    Santa Cruz, California Web design, site updating, testing
    webmaster@overlander.net search engine optimization, graphics
                                  and more

    http://www.overlander.net/Marigold/index.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Apr 12 2001 - 11:49:14 EDT