Re: LRO: Re: RE: Re: LRs in WWII movies

From: Ivan Van Laningham (ivanlan@pauahtun.org)
Date: Wed Apr 04 2001 - 00:29:43 EDT

  • Next message: Andre Shoumatoff: "Re: LRO: Coil and Flasher"

    Hi All--

    Alex Maiolo wrote:
    >
    > What's the LR content here? (Before Lonn comes to NC to kick my butt for
    > filling his mail box with this tripe):
    > The Germans' idea of engineering produced the finest war machines of their
    > day - indisputably - but they were finicky high performance rigs, like oh,
    > lessee here, a BMW, whereas the Cromwells, Shermans, Stuarts, etc were
    > *total* pieces of crap, slow, high profiled, thin-armored and heavy, but
    > FIELD SERVICABLE!
    > One Sherman loses a turret, the other loses it's chassis. Send them back to
    > the rear only a few miles, hose out the gore, assemble a new tank, press
    > forward.

    You forgot what is arguably the best tank of WWII: the Russian T-34.
    Hardly any moving parts;-) Cranked out by the zillions, held together
    with blood sweat & piss. You really only saw them stop when they were
    blown up.

    <land-rover-on-steroids>-ly y'rs,
    Ivan;-)
    ----------------------------------------------
    Ivan Van Laningham
    Symantec
    http://www.pauahtun.org/
    http://www.foretec.com/python/workshops/1998-11/proceedings.html
    Army Signal Corps: Cu Chi, Class of '70
    Author: Teach Yourself Python in 24 Hours



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Wed Apr 04 2001 - 01:54:11 EDT