> they
>demand it. There are just better vehicles for that kind of thing.
>LRs are built for business. If I had to class it with something more common,
>I place it next to a pickup truck or something like that. They aren't
>considered SUVs, right?
You looked at pickup truck lately? Leather power seats, 50 speaker
CD changers. It's enough to make you gag.
>I like the earlier suggestion of calling it a Utility Vehicle or "UV" (no
>'s')
>...or perhaps a Utility/Masochist's Vehicle. Then we could all refer to it
>as an "Um-Vee".
Masochism isn't a sport?
_______________________________________________
LRO mailing list
LRO@land-rover.team.net
http://land-rover.team.net/mailman/listinfo/lro
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sun Jan 26 2003 - 02:24:29 EST