Re: [lro] Is a Series an SUV?

From: David Scheidt (dmschei@attglobal.net)
Date: Sun Jan 26 2003 - 02:17:34 EST

  • Next message: TeriAnn Wakeman: "Re: [lro] dmv woes (kinda long)"

    > they
    >demand it. There are just better vehicles for that kind of thing.
    >LRs are built for business. If I had to class it with something more common,
    >I place it next to a pickup truck or something like that. They aren't
    >considered SUVs, right?

    You looked at pickup truck lately? Leather power seats, 50 speaker
    CD changers. It's enough to make you gag.

    >I like the earlier suggestion of calling it a Utility Vehicle or "UV" (no
    >'s')
    >...or perhaps a Utility/Masochist's Vehicle. Then we could all refer to it
    >as an "Um-Vee".

    Masochism isn't a sport?
    _______________________________________________
    LRO mailing list
    LRO@land-rover.team.net
    http://land-rover.team.net/mailman/listinfo/lro



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sun Jan 26 2003 - 02:24:29 EST