Re: [lro] Is a Series an SUV?

From: Paul Oxley (paul@adventures.co.za)
Date: Sun Jan 26 2003 - 00:42:48 EST

  • Next message: David Scheidt: "Re: [lro] Is a Series an SUV?"

    On 26 Jan 2003 at 0:34, A. Maiolo wrote:

    > I like the earlier suggestion of calling it a Utility Vehicle or "UV" (no
    > 's')
    > ...or perhaps a Utility/Masochist's Vehicle. Then we could all refer to it
    > as an "Um-Vee".

    Guys, guys, guys... Why this need to define in terms of someone elses standards?

    A Series is a Land-Rover! Not even a 4X4 (which is mostly just a light truck with a second
    diff), simply a Land-Rover!

    Regards

    Paul Oxley
    AfricanAdrenalin.com

    IMPORTANT: This email is intended for the use of the individual
    addressee(s) named above and may contain information that is
    confidential privileged or unsuitable for overly sensitive persons with
    low self-esteem, no sense of humour or irrational religious beliefs. If
    you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, distribution or
    copying of this email is not authorised (either explicitly or
    implicitly) and constitutes an irritating social faux pas.
    _______________________________________________
    LRO mailing list
    LRO@land-rover.team.net
    http://land-rover.team.net/mailman/listinfo/lro



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sun Jan 26 2003 - 01:17:03 EST