Re: [lro] 2.25 Compression

From: David Scheidt (dmschei@attglobal.net)
Date: Mon Jan 13 2003 - 08:37:07 EST

  • Next message: Alan J. Richer: "Re: [lro] 2.25 Compression"

    >--- "John M. Baker" <jmbaker@bkk2.loxinfo.co.th> wrote:
    >>
    >> Any drawbacks to shimming the rocker towers vs.
    >> installing shorter pushrods
    >> when shaving heads?
    >
    >Shorter pushrods seems easier, esp. when you think about
    >having to deal with the oil feeds and everything else.
    >
    >
    >Dumb question - is a pushrod something you can buty in a
    >specific length as a generic item? Not having done a lot
    >with racing engines and the like lo these many years it's
    >not something I'm familiar with.
    >

    They're engine specific. For something like a small block chevy,
    it's not a problem to find a pushrod that's the right length (as long
    as it's within about .200 of standard), diameter, and material for
    the cam, rockers and valves in that engine. For the 2.25, I think
    there are just two choices, one for 8:1 heads, and the other for 7:1.
    Of course, a pushrod isn't exactly super high-tech, so if you needed
    a set in a non-standard length your friendly racing engine machinist
    could turn and case-harden a set for you.

    David
    _______________________________________________
    LRO mailing list
    LRO@land-rover.team.net
    http://land-rover.team.net/mailman/listinfo/lro



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Jan 13 2003 - 08:39:07 EST