Re: LRO: head vs engine rebuild

From: Jim Hall (jimfoo@qwest.net)
Date: Wed Apr 18 2001 - 17:06:31 EDT

  • Next message: N Forbes: "RE: LRO: Iron Duke conversion"

    Didn't make sense to me either, which is why I asked. Must be a
    rebuilders ploy to make one spend more money. I am doing just the head,
    and getting .080 shaved off it.

    Perrone Ford wrote:
    >
    > This makes little sense. The reasons for rebuilding the top and bottom ends
    > are COMEPLETELY different. IT is VERY common to do only top end rebuilds.
    > Case in point: Oval track racing.

    -- 
    Jim Hall
    1966 88" Elephant Chaser
    http://www.users.qwest.net/~jimfoo
    "You know, I never really damaged my Rover 'till I started wheeling 
    with Jim." Mitch Stockdale
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Wed Apr 18 2001 - 18:26:00 EDT