Speaking of radiators, I am looking at re-coring my Series II radiator. But
that is the same as replacing the whole thing with a IIa radiator from RN.
Any advantages/disadvantages to going one way or the other. FWIW I would be
recoring with what they call an MX core.
Rich Williams
Series II 109 SW
----- Original Message -----
From: William L Leacock <roverbilly@juno.com>
To: <lro@land-rover.team.net>
Sent: Monday, April 09, 2001 3:50 PM
Subject: LRO: radiators
> Winn, the core of the 2.25 and 2.6 L rads are the same. There is a
> difference in the inlet /outlet pipe positions. ISTR that the top
> connection is at the side on the 2.6 and in the center on the 2.25
> The core is 439 mm between headers, 458 wide and 52 mm deep, ( 3 row -
> 10 fins per inch) or 73 mm deep on the ser2. There are a number of
> factors to be considered when comparing performance, the type and the
> spacing of the fin (fin density) are significant. I believe that the
> core thickness was reduced when the fin was changed to a higher
> performance type.
>
> Regards from Western New York State
>
> Bill Leacock.
>
> aged 21 (33 times)
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Apr 09 2001 - 21:27:36 EDT