LRO: Re: Re: The Land-Rover Bodied Bastard

From: Jean-Leon Morin (offroaddesign@softhome.net)
Date: Fri Apr 06 2001 - 18:14:22 EDT

  • Next message: joe mulqueen: "LRO: re. soundproofing"

    >
    > >After all, once I'm done, I'll be able to say that even with a simple
    body
    > left, I'll still have more rover in my ford than you have in that restored
    > beauty of yours.
    >
    > Let's see....You have a vehicle that has a Land Rover body but a different
    > engine, drivetrain, frame, etc., etc., etc. The other guy has a restored
    > stock Land Rover in perfect condition. But you claim your vehicle
    > is more a Land Rover than his. I'd love to know what you've been
    > smoking (or injecting) to come up with that logic, as it sounds like
    > something that could get me through my workday a hell of a lot easier.

    Marin, I am tiring of this debate. We are obviously not getting anywhere. I
    personally thought I might gain something by discussing this with you, but I
    am not gaining anything. You are right, I know that. Technically, of course
    you are right. You were right all along. We all know that.

    But life is not technical. Those who dwell on technicalities waste their
    lives. Life is color, not numbers. In the end, I know I am right, and that's
    all that matters to me. I have spent an enormous amount of time reading your
    replies in the last little while, but I regret it now, as I have not
    profited from them at all, other than reinforcing my desire to continue
    modifying rovers to suit my needs, instead of paying homage to a vehicle.

    Marin, I'm sorry if I have offended you in any way, didn't mean to do it.
    Your aggressive attacks on young people did get to me a bit, not because I
    feel singled out, but they reinforce the notion that I will have to prepare
    myself in order to deal with you when I enter the real workforce. I forgive
    you as you obviously have never come into contact with smart young people,
    and I feel sorry for you. It must be hell living when you think everything
    you do is to benefit a generation that is without value.

    I am now wondering if this whole debate thing was simply a contest, to see
    who would come out winning. To see if the restoration crowd would be able to
    shut up the kids and their damn new ideas. If you are so petty as to think
    the point of a debate is to crown a winner, if it takes this to make you
    feel better, you win. You won.

    You won the round, and you are winning the race at keeping your precious
    little Land-Rover hobby away from the kids. The real truth is, I'm twenty.
    This is my first Land-Rover, not my last. I will have many more. By trying
    to alienate all newcomers, you are assuring that the numbers of enthusiasts
    will dwindle. Junk trucks will stay in fields, as no one will want to
    rebuild them, because they think all Land-Rovers have to be bone stock. They
    will never have the chance to modify an old vehicle because they'll always
    have some old person telling them that by cutting up a rotted out old junk
    III, they are destroying history. They will tire of all this crap, and move
    on to other vehicles. And they will never get older and appreciate Land
    rovers long enough to restore one of them.

    J-L



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Apr 06 2001 - 22:21:35 EDT