Re: LRO: Re: To be a Land Rover or not to be a Land Rover - that is thequestion

From: Paul Oxley (paul@adventures.co.za)
Date: Thu Apr 05 2001 - 02:00:52 EDT

Next message: Paul Oxley: "Re: LRO: RE: Parts availability vs. bulletproofing"

Previous message: Faure, Marin: "LRO: Re: Youth"
In reply to: Richard.Clarke@nre.vic.gov.au: "LRO: Re: To be a Land Rover or not to be a Land Rover - that is the question"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Richard.Clarke@nre.vic.gov.au wrote:

> The stage 1 Landy in Australia had a (Japanese) Isuzu engine as an option, the
> vehicle recognised the engine as foreign but recognised the LT95 gearbox and
> front diff. as slightly foreign as they came from the Range Rover (close
> brother)

Actually the LT95 was developed for the 101 Forward Control, and also
used in the Rangie and the early 110's as well.

Regards

Paul Oxley
AfricanAdrenalin.com

Next message: Paul Oxley: "Re: LRO: RE: Parts availability vs. bulletproofing"
Previous message: Faure, Marin: "LRO: Re: Youth"
In reply to: Richard.Clarke@nre.vic.gov.au: "LRO: Re: To be a Land Rover or not to be a Land Rover - that is the question"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Apr 05 2001 - 03:25:54 EDT