[ First Message Last | Table of Contents | <- Digest -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
msg | Sender | lines | Subject |
1 | M.J.Rooth@lboro.ac.uk (M | 15 | Re: Petrol? |
2 | Mikko Kalevi Lehmusto [m | 28 | Peugeot Diesels |
3 | Adrian Redmond [channel6 | 75 | Faulty glowplugs SIII Diesel 2.25l |
4 | Alan_Richer@motorcity2.l | 26 | Re: Burnt No. 4 Intake |
5 | M.J.Rooth@lboro.ac.uk (M | 28 | Re: Mike Rooth |
6 | "The Becketts" [hillman@ | 19 | New Landie |
7 | Alan_Richer@motorcity2.l | 15 | Re: Mike Rooth |
8 | Leger Marc-Andre [mleger | 26 | RE: New Landie |
9 | M.J.Rooth@lboro.ac.uk (M | 13 | Re: Mike Rooth |
10 | John Cranfield [john.cra | 24 | Re: Burnt No. 4 Intake |
11 | "Alain-Jean PARES" [Info | 11 | Re: New Landie |
12 | Dale Smith [smithdv1@yah | 30 | Re: New Landie |
13 | "Andy Grafton" [andyg@sh | 22 | Re: Chrysler 727 Torqueflyte |
14 | "\"Mr. Mike\" Passaretti | 27 | Re: easy choice for Simon |
15 | "Kevin and Crew" [willey | 20 | new landy |
16 | "Steve Mace" [steve@solw | 39 | Re: Burnt No. 4 Intake |
17 | Alan_Richer@motorcity2.l | 19 | Re: Burnt No. 4 Intake |
18 | "HENRY STAGE"[henry.stag | 23 | Babes did 11a's |
19 | M.J.Rooth@lboro.ac.uk (M | 12 | Re: Babes did 11a's |
20 | "Kenner, Dixon" [Dixon.K | 14 | babe magnets |
21 | Alan_Richer@motorcity2.l | 13 | Re: babe magnets |
22 | "Neil Brownlee" [metal_t | 26 | Babe magnets |
23 | "British Bulldog Spares, | 21 | Mighty Joe Young! |
24 | Fred Dushin [fadushin@bl | 44 | Re: Bill Rice's Brake Woes |
25 | "A. P. \"Sandy\" Grice" | 32 | Brakin' up |
26 | M.J.Rooth@lboro.ac.uk (M | 16 | Re: Mighty Joe Young! |
27 | SJH [SHARDING@SCHULTE-LA | 9 | who's mad? |
28 | M.J.Rooth@lboro.ac.uk (M | 25 | Re: Babe magnets |
29 | Markus Korth [mkorth@sys | 19 | Re: babe magnets |
30 | Alan_Richer@motorcity2.l | 27 | Re: babe magnets |
31 | TeriAnn Wakeman [twakema | 42 | Re: easy choice for Simon |
32 | Keith Cutler [keith_cutl | 18 | Michelin Tubes in Tubeless Tires |
33 | asfco [asfco@banet.net> | 13 | Re: babe magnets/ALAN |
34 | "Steve Mace" [steve@solw | 32 | Re: Burnt No. 4 Intake |
35 | "Faure, Marin" [Marin.Fa | 48 | Re: auto boxes |
36 | Alan_Richer@motorcity2.l | 28 | Re: Burnt No. 4 Intake |
37 | AKBLACKLEY@aol.com | 25 | Occassional Missing V8 |
38 | "Faure, Marin" [Marin.Fa | 37 | Series IIa vs III |
39 | "Faure, Marin" [Marin.Fa | 92 | Re: Burnt No. 4 Intake |
40 | TeriAnn Wakeman [twakema | 32 | Re: babe magnets |
41 | dbobeck@ushmm.org | 31 | Re[2]: easy choice for Simon |
42 | "Matthew J. Clement" [ma | 24 | Last chance to order UK plates before Xmas |
43 | Malcolm Woodruff [kap08@ | 12 | PKV |
44 | dbobeck@ushmm.org | 13 | Re[2]: babe magnets |
45 | dbobeck@ushmm.org | 10 | Re[2]: babe magnets/ALAN |
46 | dbobeck@ushmm.org | 16 | Re[2]: babe magnets |
47 | dbobeck@ushmm.org | 14 | Re: babe magnets |
48 | F.Lankenau@t-online.de ( | 9 | Lankenau@Bigfoot.com |
49 | Shaun Oriold [soriold@wo | 17 | Re: Can I sue? |
50 | Clinton Coates [ccoates@ | 17 | [not specified] |
51 | Clinton Coates [ccoates@ | 15 | Peugeot Diesels |
52 | Clinton Coates [ccoates@ | 17 | auto boxes and lockups |
53 | "d.h.lowe" [dhlowe@idire | 19 | Re: Chrysler 727 Torqueflyte |
54 | "d.h.lowe" [dhlowe@idire | 19 | Re: Occassional Missing V8 |
55 | Malcolm Woodruff [kap08@ | 16 | LPG Series 3 Conversion |
56 | dbobeck@ushmm.org | 15 | Re: Peugeot Diesels |
57 | Garrick Brett Olsen [gbo | 36 | Stalling |
58 | Joseph Broach [jbroach@s | 71 | [not specified] |
59 | John Cranfield [john.cra | 21 | Re: Stalling |
60 | Paul Lonsdale [Lonsdale@ | 20 | Re:petrol by the pound |
61 | Paul Lonsdale [Lonsdale@ | 20 | Re: Chrysler 727 Torqueflyte |
62 | "Frank Elson" [frankelso | 16 | Re: New Landies (Girlfriends) |
63 | "Frank Elson" [frankelso | 16 | Re: who's mad? |
64 | "Frank Elson" [frankelso | 24 | Re: PKV |
65 | "Frank Elson" [frankelso | 15 | Re: Peugeot Diesels |
66 | James Wolf [J.Wolf@world | 21 | BRAKES |
67 | "Peter M. Kaskan" [pmk11 | 22 | Re: Mighty Joe Young! |
68 | "Peter M. Kaskan" [pmk11 | 29 | Re: BRAKES |
69 | James Wolf [J.Wolf@world | 20 | posting |
70 | "Peter M. Kaskan" [pmk11 | 54 | [not specified] |
71 | Paul Oxley [paul@adventu | 18 | Re: Stalling |
72 | DNDANGER@aol.com | 19 | Re: Babes did 11a's |
73 | DNDANGER@aol.com | 14 | Re: babe magnets |
74 | Faye and Peter Ogilvie [ | 27 | Re: Side curtains forever!!! |
75 | Skhar1927@aol.com | 8 | who's mad |
76 | Skhar1927@aol.com | 14 | who's mad |
77 | Dale Smith [smithdv1@yah | 9 | test |
78 | "Steve Mace" [steve@solw | 42 | Re: Burnt No. 4 Intake |
From: M.J.Rooth@lboro.ac.uk (Mike Rooth) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 1998 12:01:04 +0000 Subject: Re: Petrol? Regrettably,yes. or the fact >that two of our players took payments from a bookie? (Note were were >taught to do that by our friends from the Indian sub-continent (dunno if it >was the Pakistanis or the Indians). The sin was not in the taking.It was in the being found out...:-) Mike - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 2 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981211 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Mikko Kalevi Lehmusto <mlehmust@hit.fi> Date: Thu, 10 Dec 1998 14:09:11 +0200 Subject: Peugeot Diesels If have experience on only one Peugeot diesel engine, but that is a piece of machinery that has truly impressed me. The vehicle in question is an old Talbot Horizon (a Finnish made car), which uses the Peugeot 1.9l N/A 4-cyl diesel. My friend's father has had it for years as a "second car". Whenever my friends and I have made longer trips (usually hiking trips to Lappland) we have always borrowed this car, mostly because it's so damn cheap to drive. We have usually got at about 4.5 l/100 km , which makes around 52 mpg (if I calculated it correctly). With the fuel prices in Finland being what they are that's quite important for a student... The engine has now about 220 000 miles on it, with only normal maintenance (oil changes etc) and it seems to go on forever. Of course the thing is not a rocket, but if you wait long enough with the gas pedal floored, it'll slowly climb up to around 100 mph on a good day, which I would have never believed if I hadn't done it myself. If the other Peugeot diesels are anything like that engine, just get it. Mikko Lehmusto student, Mech. Engineering FINLAND - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 3 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981211 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Adrian Redmond <channel6@post2.tele.dk> Date: Thu, 10 Dec 1998 13:11:37 +0100 Subject: Faulty glowplugs SIII Diesel 2.25l I have cured my glow plug problem - if anyone is interested, here's the circuit - 12 volts is fed from the ignition switch in pre-heat position, through a ballast which provides a dummy load to obviate short circuit or putting the entire load through the indicator lamp. The ballast gets hot as the glow plugs draw more current, thus increasing it's resistance. The panel light is in parallel with the ballast, when the circuit is first closed, the ballast has almost no resistance, hence the indicator lamp doesn't get much power as the current follows the path of least resistance. As the ballast heats up, the resistance rises, allowing more current to flow through the lamp, by passing the ballast and making the lamp glow brighter. The glow plugs are wired in series - like christmas tree lights - if one is dud, then they all do not work. (Some vehicles use parallel wired glow plugs, but not the stock rover 2.25 diesel) The glow plug filament, and its two terminals, should be isolated from the chassis of the glow plug (the threaded casing which screws into the block) If the plug is faulty internally - a short between the filament wiring and the casing will ground the pre-heat circuit, drawing current but not allowing the glow plugs to heat up properly, and not allowing the ballast to warm up. (At least mine didn't) I had a short between filament and chassis on the front (#1) plug). Theoretically, the further forward the short is, the less it should affect the working of the other plugs, but I guess the circuit is dimensioned to heat up just right when all four ar working, so even a short of #1 will not offer enough resistance/load to heat the other 3. Anyway - that was the cause of my problem - replaced #1 and all worked fine. Here's a sort of diagram for those who may be interested. the circuit is simple - no relays, hence the BIG cables onto the ignition switch. panel indicator lamp 12v |---O---| glow plugs from key | | 4 3 2 1 (front >) o-------------o///////o-----------| |----| |----| |----| |------o earth ballast coil |o| |o| |o| |o| on bulkhead Hope this proves of interest to someone! Happy rovering... Adrian Redmond CHANNEL 6 TELEVISION DENMARK Foerlevvej 6 Mesing DK-8660 Skanderborg Denmark telephone (office) +45 86 57 22 66 telephone (home) +45 86 57 22 64 telefacsimile / data +45 86 57 24 46 mobile GSM (EFP unit) +45 40 74 75 64 mobile GSM (admin) +45 40 50 22 66 mobile NMT +45 30 86 75 66 e-mail channel6@post2.tele.dk website www.channel6.dk "Native Experience" - production unit in Alaska USA telephone (907) 230 0359 e-mail channel6@alaska.net Visit the "Native Experience" project website at http://www.channel6.dk/native - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 4 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981211 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Alan_Richer@motorcity2.lotus.com Date: Thu, 10 Dec 1998 07:13:23 -0500 Subject: Re: Burnt No. 4 Intake Mitch - First off, good luck finding Series II mains. I couldn't even find them in the UK when I was there..... Secondly, if you're trashing #4 consistently, is there a possibility that your brake booster or something else is causing a lean mix down at the back end of the motor? Seems like it might be a possibility here. I did the long drives with Mr. C before I got myself moved closer to home, and I didn't burn valves. Also, is there a possibility that you've got a cracked or otherwise messed up exhaust manifold? Air incursion through a bad gasket or something like it might cause problems. When you take the manifolds off, check the mating surfaces with a good straightedge. Lastly, don't use the silly separated ring-type manifold gasket - use a full-length one. The intake-only aluminum gaskets never made a lot of sense to me..... ajr - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 5 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981211 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: M.J.Rooth@lboro.ac.uk (Mike Rooth) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 1998 12:14:41 +0000 Subject: Re: Mike Rooth >It has a limited slip differential? I thought this stopped wind up? It was just a thought,Neil,based on your description of the problem. Now you've got me confused:-) A centre diff will stop windup,but surely if you had one of those,you'd have permanent 4WD? I cant see how limited slip *axle* diffs could though. Then again,I *did* say I was not au fait with the Explorer's layout. If it went to 50-50 and the front diff was >'broken' wouldn't I just skid around as the back tries the now locked up >front? Not sure.As a guess,if the front diff was inoperative,as say,a broken halfshaft or FWH not engaged,I'd say you just wouldnt go anywhere. Locked up though,wouldnt there be a distinct reluctance to turn corners? >if you turn your LR wheel 1 turn of full lock does it sound like the front >is going to drop off? Mine sounds like that from the instant I start the engine.I dont need to touch the steering wheel:-) Cheers Mike - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 6 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981211 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "The Becketts" <hillman@bigpond.com> Date: Thu, 10 Dec 1998 22:03:56 +1100 Subject: New Landie Alain-Jean PARES wrote: >The only problem is my girlfriend, she doesn't want >to even think of buying a new landie... Alain-Jean you have answered your own question! Re-read the above sentence - see the word "girlfriend" She isn't your wife.... 8-0 I recently went throught the same problem. But in my case it was my wife. I didn't buy the Landie. Ron (now donning Nomex suit in expectation of email from TW) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 7 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981211 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Alan_Richer@motorcity2.lotus.com Date: Thu, 10 Dec 1998 07:23:02 -0500 Subject: Re: Mike Rooth Mike slanders: >Mine sounds like that from the instant I start the engine.I dont need to >touch the steering wheel:-) Nora's going to get you for this.....for a well-behaved elderly lady she does quite nicely. aj"Never speak ill of the car when it can hear you...."r - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 8 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981211 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Leger Marc-Andre <mleger@wefa.com> Date: Thu, 10 Dec 1998 07:29:58 -0500 Subject: RE: New Landie I don't have a girlfriend but would give up one of my LR's for a wife... I guess I have the wrong attitude, perhaps I need to go around making derogatory comments too ;-) I may suggest an option: keep the girlfriend and buy her a nice rock, get down on one knee, give her the rock... then bring up the Landy... }\/\/\/\{ Marc-Andre Leger | | Network Eng. ()()---, | WEFA inc. (_ | 800 Baldwin Tower |_______| Eddystone Pennsylvania -/\-----| USA 19022 |/\/ , , | (610) 490-2763 /\/ |_| | mailto:ma.leger@wefa.com -~ || | http://www.wefa.com |_____||_| http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Station/8098/ "Anyone who has never made a mistake has never tried anything new." Albert Einstein - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 9 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981211 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: M.J.Rooth@lboro.ac.uk (Mike Rooth) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 1998 12:30:51 +0000 Subject: Re: Mike Rooth >Nora's going to get you for this.....for a well-behaved elderly lady she does >quite nicely. > aj"Never speak ill of the car when it can hear you...."r I typed it in a whisper,Al...... Mike - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 10 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981211 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: John Cranfield <john.cranfield@ns.sympatico.ca> Date: Thu, 10 Dec 1998 09:01:50 -0400 Subject: Re: Burnt No. 4 Intake Ask Dave Lowe about thermostats and bits of skirt and he'll tell you you need one of each. You should be using the original "skirted " thermostat not one of the newer flat ones which allow too much by-pass of the coolant. John and Muddy The Stockdales wrote: > Hello again my friends > Two months ago I pestered you about burning the No. 4 Intake valve for = > the fourth time. Many replies said cooling problem, many said I was a = > fool for running it down the Hiway at 70+ MPH - 100 miles each day. = > Well I am finally getting around to fixing the Dinosaur and have to ask = > the same questions again (lost my hard-drive&no backup). > Scenario: 2.25l Series II engine, 7:1 compression head. 100K+100K+many = [ truncated by list-digester (was 31 lines)] > as NLA). > Mitch and the Red Dinosaur - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 11 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981211 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Alain-Jean PARES" <InfoDyne@wanadoo.fr> Date: Thu, 10 Dec 1998 14:04:48 +0100 Subject: Re: New Landie >I may suggest an option: keep the girlfriend and buy her a nice rock, get >down on one knee, give her the rock... then bring up the Landy... It's the way I'll do it. Thanks a lot. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 12 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981211 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
[spamkill: @yahoo\. input: %s] Return-Path: <smithdv1@yahoo.com> From: Dale Smith <smithdv1@yahoo.com> Date: Thu, 10 Dec 1998 21:24:49 +0800 (SGT) Subject: Re: New Landie Alain-Jean PARES wrote: The only problem is my girlfriend, she doesn't want to even think of buying a new landie... Alain-Jean you have answered your own question! Re-read the above sentence - see the word "girlfriend" She isn't your wife.... 8-0 I recently went throught the same problem. But in my case it was my wife. I didn't buy the Landie. Ron (now donning Nomex suit in expectation of email from TW) I agree with Ron, if she is just a girlfriend (not sharing rent, bills...) then what you decide to spend your money is pretty much your decision. TW, what would you say to a SO who didn't like your Rover? On a different note; My wife and I have been talking about getting a second Rover for the last six months to replace her VW. She hasn't been keen on the idea until the past week. Last week it started to snow, and has snowed every day since. She is having a serious change of heart....:-) You could also point out the obvious to your girlfriend," you feel that she is much safer in a truck than a car". I have seen how some people drive in France, this might not be a bad arguement. Smitty - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 13 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981211 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Andy Grafton" <andyg@sherco.co.za> Date: Thu, 10 Dec 1998 15:07:04 +0200 Subject: Re: Chrysler 727 Torqueflyte Thanks to everyone who responded, re: early Range Rover 3 speed autos. Now I'm onto a good thing perhaps I can glean the following; How did they attach it to the transfer case (I know... bolts), and which transfer case did they use? If it is an LT95 effort then there must have been an adaptor plate? And... What auto 'box did they use in a Rover SD1? And... Is there a 4 speed auto 'box that will fit in the same hole as the Chrysler 727 Torqueflyte, using the same mountings? All the best, Andy andyg@sherco.co.za, '79RR I'm just interested. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 14 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981211 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "\"Mr. Mike\" Passaretti" <passaretti@sol.med.ge.com> Date: Thu, 10 Dec 1998 07:42:14 -0600 Subject: Re: easy choice for Simon >>>>> "Faye" == Faye and Peter Ogilvie <ogilvi@hgea.org> writes: Faye> If you like plastic that falls apart, pieces Faye> blocking the airflow from the front vents, and can't Faye> shift a real transmission, then by all means buy the Faye> POS '72 series III. If you want a real rover, buy Faye> the '70 series IIa. You can tell I have no bias Faye> against the series III. And obviously if you have low self-esteem, no character of your own and a childish need to identify with inanimate objects to gauge your worth then look to this fellow. Feh. -MM -- Owner of an SIII and a Triumph with roll-up windows. (And tired of SGS-suffering cretins who seem to think I'm not good enough to be in their club(s) because I have syncros and/or no sidecurtains.) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 15 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981211 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
[digester: Removing section of: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; ] From: "Kevin and Crew" <willeys@cyberus.ca> Date: Thu, 10 Dec 1998 08:53:40 -0500 Subject: new landy charset="iso-8859-1" just had to send in my 2c worth ladys love the lightweight Kevin Willey 1996 disko (edith), 1973 lightwieght, 1987 Merlin, 1998 True North soft tail(full boing) Hummers hum but Land Rovers know the words ! ------=_NextPart_000_0008_01BE241A.A6C17B00 [ Original post was HTML ] [digester: Removing section of: Content-Type: text/html; ] [Attachment removed, was 28 lines.] - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 16 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981211 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Steve Mace" <steve@solwise.co.uk> Date: Thu, 10 Dec 1998 13:44:25 -0000 Subject: Re: Burnt No. 4 Intake I've just been through the thermostat replacing process on my SIII 2.25 and I found it impossible to obtain a replacement 'skirted' thermostat. These are the older ethylene glycol type and the normal outlets I tried (Paddock Craddocks) couldn't supply one. In the end I fitted a modern, wax type 77 degree. Since fitting I have noticed that the engine does have tendancy to get a bit too near the red mark on the temperature guage (with the old stat it was never getting warm; the stat. was jammed open). Is this the reason why? I've fitted the wrong type of stat? If you can't get hold of the old glycol type stat. is there a mod. you can do to the thermostat housing that can be done to cure this problem? On 10 Dec 98, at 9:01, John Cranfield wrote: > Ask Dave Lowe about thermostats and bits of skirt and he'll tell you you need > one of each. > You should be using the original "skirted " thermostat not one of the newer > flat ones which allow too much by-pass of the coolant. Steve 1972 SIII LtWt 1993 D90 In the UK Name: Dr Steve Mace E-mail: steve@solwise.co.uk www: http://www.solwise.co.uk Tel: +44 1482 473899 Fax: +44 1482 472245 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 17 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981211 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Alan_Richer@motorcity2.lotus.com Date: Thu, 10 Dec 1998 09:07:10 -0500 Subject: Re: Burnt No. 4 Intake Steve, Did the thermostat you fit have any method for blocking off the bypass when it opened? If not, then the cooling path isn't going to be working right and could be causing your difficualties (though i'm honestly not all that sure...). For the folks who can't get the proper stats, i've heard that putting a blanking plate in the bypass hose with a 5/16" hole in it will serve a similar puropse - restricting the flow on open thermostat. Having never tried this myself I'd be cautious with it, but it's worth a shot... ajr - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 18 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981211 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "HENRY STAGE"<henry.stage@smtp.cnet.navy.mil> Date: Thu, 10 Dec 1998 08:59:05 -0600 Subject: Babes did 11a's Okay, we all know that real rovers have eyeballs in the middle because it keeps 'em cross-eyed. When they put the eyes out on the wings the poor beasts got stereo vision and started to balk at going places the heretofore they had been blissfully quite comfortable going... Now, if you believe that, buy the 11a and tell your wife that it followed you home, it's nose is cold so it's healthy, you'll keep it outside even at night, and you'll take care of it by yourself. A little whining will go a long way, don't forget to stick out the lower lip a little and make demurring sounds (works everytime). Good luck with the diminutive beast, and whatever you do, for god's sake, DO NOT EVER ask the list about schackle torques... Cheers, Cole Stage, Hefelump herder IIa ambulance - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 19 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981211 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: M.J.Rooth@lboro.ac.uk (Mike Rooth) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 1998 14:35:25 +0000 Subject: Re: Babes did 11a's > Good luck with the diminutive beast, and whatever you do, for god's > sake, DO NOT EVER ask the list about schackle torques... ...Or Free Wheel Hubs.. Cheers Mike Rooth - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 20 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981211 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Kenner, Dixon" <Dixon.Kenner@ms.rc.x400.gc.ca> Date: 10 Dec 1998 09:50:00 -0500 Subject: babe magnets Paul Donohue writes: >Remember, the Land Rover can be the ultimate babe magnet. Yo, Mr. Berg, care to comment on this? How does the BMW compare with the Land-Rover? (I can say that the BGB does better than a Saab 900, though I tend to think the Mini did better than the BGB. Summertime, 88", no top, downtown Ottawa in the market area... It works...) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 21 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981211 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Alan_Richer@motorcity2.lotus.com Date: Thu, 10 Dec 1998 10:04:44 -0500 Subject: Re: babe magnets Considering I've had attractive women alone in cars smiling and waving at me on the highway, I agree on the concept that an LR may help one be more attractive... ...'cause God knows it ain't my smiling face that's attracting 'em. aj"Warthogs R' Us"r - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 22 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981211 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Neil Brownlee" <metal_thrasher@email.msn.com> Date: Thu, 10 Dec 1998 15:15:12 -0000 Subject: Babe magnets Er....talking about Babe Magnets?! Well, my LR may be a police magnet...but no babes. The Explorer is an idiot magent...i.e. people can't see it and pull out on me (I dunno what they think it is!!!). Anyone else had the police magnet problem...it seems that driving a 20 year old LR with military colours and a 20 foot ariel (?) is cause for concern! It's all MOT'd and the Taxed and all the tyres are legal....why don't they stop the pr*cks in F*rd Escorts that do 90mph around my estate which is a 30!!! Oh, and why do F*rd Escorts seemingly have un-turnoffable front fog lights and drivers with reversed baseball caps?!!!!!!! Oh, and noise supression systems that all LR owners would love (i.e. a working, audible stereo!!!!) Anyway...I can't wait till one stops sharp in front of me...oh dear!!!! Neil SIII 109" 1978 NO ESCORT!!!! - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 23 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981211 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "British Bulldog Spares, Ltd." <bulldog@meganet.net> Date: Thu, 10 Dec 1998 10:18:50 -0500 Subject: Mighty Joe Young! Hey Guys, Wow! Just saw a preview last night for the new Disney flick "Mighty Joe Young." They showed no less than SIX Land Rovers in the preview! Three 109s, two 88s and a IIB or a 101 way in the background. This is gonna be quite a movie for us Rover-geeks with no lives! One bad note, they did show the gorilla smashing and knocking over a 109" that was chasing him. Oh well . . . :) Check it out! See ya, Paul - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 24 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981211 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Fred Dushin <fadushin@blackcat.cat.syr.edu> Date: Thu, 10 Dec 1998 10:20:44 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: Bill Rice's Brake Woes // Two questions: 1) when I clamp rear brake line, pedal's firm. // Squishiness isn't real problem, even when driving w/ no clamps--main // prob. is that pedal won't pump up at all, which un-nerves me, even though // I've not "bottomed out" the pedal in weeks of driving around. Haynes suggests using the clutch-bleed method for rear lines, if they are not expelling air, when using the old-fashioned bleed method, ie, two or more people: pump pedal rapdily three times, tighten bleed screw, let up pedal, loosen bleed screw, pump once, tighten, let up, loosen, pump once, tighen, let up, loosen, etc. I noticed that on the 88 I have it was hard to get all the air out of the rear lines without using this method (I have yet to do it, in fact, and I have the same squishiness you report), and that was with a freshly rebuilt CB. I wonder if the problem is more likely with a 109. // My LF is way farther (in linear brake line feet) from the master than my // RF is. Are my SIIA lines routed differently (over engine to 5 way jct, // then under engine and up to LF wheel cylinder) than other folks' SIIAs? My IIA is routed as yours is, I suspect -- brake master to 5-way junction runs along the firewall behind the engine, then down the passenger (NA) footwell. 5-way junction is mounted to the frame on RH side, just as it is on RH drive vehicles. If memory serves, Haynes recommends the order you mentioned, but does not say nearest to farthest. They say something like farthest to nearest in front, then nearest to farthest (? or was it the other way around -- don't have it in front of me) in back. I didn't follow their advice, but then again I still have air in my lines... -Fred Dushin Oliver '64 Regular -- Fred Dushin mailto:fadushin@blackcat.cat.syr.edu PGP public key available at http://blackcat.cat.syr.edu/~fadushin/pgp - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 25 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981211 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "A. P. \"Sandy\" Grice" <rover@pinn.net> Date: Thu, 10 Dec 1998 10:25:15 -0500 Subject: Brakin' up Bill Rice Jarvis64@aol.com wrote: >2) why do people always say bleed nearest to farthest; LF, RF . . .? My LF >is way farther (in linear brake line feet) from the master than my RF is. Correct...on a LHD vehicle the right front is the nearest cylinder. Which raises another interesting question sure to have sides/opinions. Bushings! No wait...let's not start that again ;-) Rather do you bleed from nearest to farthest or the other way 'round. I can make and have heard compelling reasoning/arguments for both and indeed have used both over the years without finding an appreciable difference. Of course, now that I use silicone brake fluid (another controversial subject, it seems) I haven't touched the brake system in five years, except to change the fluid and renew the shoes. Let the games begin! ;-) Cheers *----jeep may be famous, LAND-ROVER is Legendary----* | | | A. P. ("Sandy") Grice | | Rover Owners' Association of Virginia, Ltd. | | Association of North American Rover Clubs | | 1633 Melrose Pkwy., Norfolk, VA 23508-1730 | |(O)757-622-7054, (H)757-423-4898, FAX 757-622-7056 | | | | (original owner) (pre-production) | *----1972 Series III------1996 Discovery SE-7(m)----* - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 26 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981211 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: M.J.Rooth@lboro.ac.uk (Mike Rooth) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 1998 15:26:00 +0000 Subject: Re: Mighty Joe Young! >Wow! Just saw a preview last night for the new Disney flick "Mighty Joe >Young." Thank you Paul for making me feel even more incredibly ancient than I really am.I can remember going to see the *original* version of "Mighty Joe Young"..... Cheers Mike Rooth (Depressed) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 27 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981211 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: SJH <SHARDING@SCHULTE-LAW.COM> Date: Thu, 10 Dec 1998 07:26:00 -0800 Subject: who's mad? alan richer wrote who'd you anger?. No one, i think, just wanted to avoid doing so. thanks for the advice. simon harding (still trying to decide and still working on the wife) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 28 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981211 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: M.J.Rooth@lboro.ac.uk (Mike Rooth) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 1998 15:33:03 +0000 Subject: Re: Babe magnets >Anyone else had the police magnet problem...it seems that driving a 20 year >old LR with military colours and a 20 foot ariel (?) is cause for concern! Its well known that the fuzz dont like the Army,because the squaddies have more and better toys to play with. >It's all MOT'd and the Taxed and all the tyres are legal....why don't they >stop the pr*cks in F*rd Escorts that do 90mph around my estate which is a >30!!! 'Cos they couldnt catch 'em.Last time they tried in this area,they stuffed the cop car through a shop window.... Oh, and why do F*rd Escorts seemingly have un-turnoffable front fog >lights and drivers with reversed baseball caps?!!!!!!! Oh, and noise >supression systems that all LR owners would love (i.e. a working, audible >stereo!!!!) Never mind Neil.Just wait until it snows...... Cheers Mike Rooth - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 29 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981211 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Markus Korth <mkorth@systline.de> Date: Thu, 10 Dec 1998 16:34:24 +0100 (MET) Subject: Re: babe magnets > Considering I've had attractive women alone in cars smiling and waving at me on > the highway, I agree on the concept that an LR may help one be more > attractive... And you are sure that she didn't 1) wave because she thought your LR was burning because of the smoke getting out of your exhaust 2) only showed some sort of, *uh*, compassion ? Ciao Markus - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 30 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981211 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Alan_Richer@motorcity2.lotus.com Date: Thu, 10 Dec 1998 10:47:00 -0500 Subject: Re: babe magnets Markus asks if she was waving because my LR was on fire.... or for sympathy reasons... Thanks a bunch, Markus.... kick me in the ego why don't you? 8*) No, I don't think so. As Mr. C was fresh out of the rebuild shop the first time this happened and it's been happening consistently since I am not complaining. Of course, as I'm happily married it's not like I'm going to do a whole lot about it, but then again I can dream.....8*) On a more serious note a psychologist friend of mine (she's female, for all it matters) suggests that the reasons LRs are attractive is that they display a certain competence level. This, she says, subconciously translates to competence in other things....damnifiknow what, as the conversation diverged to other items at that time. Personally, I always thought that it was because anyone with a toy like that must have income - and money is attractive no matter what your genetic structure...8*) aj"Not deluding myself...it's definitely the truck!"r - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 31 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981211 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: TeriAnn Wakeman <twakeman@cruzers.com> Date: Thu, 10 Dec 98 08:15:18 -0800 Subject: Re: easy choice for Simon >Owner of an SIII and a Triumph with roll-up windows. ; ;>(And tired of SGS-suffering cretins who seem to think I'm not ;> good enough to be in their club(s) because I have syncros ;> and/or no sidecurtains.) I have absolutely no argument with anything you said but are clubs really discriminating against your cars???I can understand a model specific club like TRA doing it because it is a TR2-3B specific club. But I have not noticed general Triumph of LR clubs discriminating against certain models. Is this really happening on a club level?? BTW, I didn't know Triumph made cars with roll up windows. 8^) 8^) 8^) 8^) Sorry I couldn't resist. Please do not let us model biggots get you down. We each have our own personal biases but I sure hope that it is not reaching into club policies or into club runs and I hope that no one is taking personal model biases seriously. Chunks of oil coated metal should never get in the way of people relating to one another. Regards TeriAnn J. Wakeman 1960 Series II 109 1961 TR3A "What! You say someone invented a syncro first gear??" TeriAnn Wakeman If you send me direct mail, please Santa Cruz, California start the subject line with TW - twakeman@cruzers.com I will be sure to read the message http://www.cruzers.com/~twakeman Walk in harmony with the earth and all her creatures and you will create beauty wherever you go. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 32 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981211 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Keith Cutler <keith_cutler@csgsystems.com> Date: Thu, 10 Dec 1998 09:35:59 -0700 Subject: Michelin Tubes in Tubeless Tires I was going to put Michelin tubes in my Goodyear Wrangler MT tires (215/85-16) until the Michelin Consumer Hotline (and some list members) advised against it. I don't need to run low pressures for the dirt/gravel/rocks/pavement surfaces I'll most often encounter; I was only planning on using tubes because members of this mailing list had advised to do so in the past. I'll go tubeless and see if I run into any problems. Thanks. Keith Cutler 1961 Series II SWB Truck Cab (restoration/rebuild proceeding nicely, okay, slowly) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 33 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981211 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: asfco <asfco@banet.net> Date: Thu, 10 Dec 1998 11:54:38 -0500 Subject: Re: babe magnets/ALAN Alan_Richer@motorcity2.lotus.com wrote: > Markus asks if she was waving because my LR was on fire.... or for sympathy > reasons... >Or was it perhaps that she recognized you from your picture on a certain T-Shirt she had seen somewhere??? Steve - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 34 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981211 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Steve Mace" <steve@solwise.co.uk> Date: Thu, 10 Dec 1998 16:01:26 -0000 Subject: Re: Burnt No. 4 Intake On 10 Dec 98, at 9:07, Alan_Richer@motorcity2.lotus. wrote: > Did the thermostat you fit have any method for blocking off the bypass when it > opened? If not, then the cooling path isn't going to be working right and could > be causing your difficualties (though i'm honestly not all that sure...). No it was just a plane flat disc so there is nothing like what you suggest blocking the bypass when the stat is open. Now it all makes sense! I'll have to go and think about it... Now I no the problem I might be able to think up a solution. Thanks... Steve 1972 SIII LtWt 1993 D90 In the UK Name: Dr Steve Mace E-mail: steve@solwise.co.uk www: http://www.solwise.co.uk Tel: +44 1482 473899 Fax: +44 1482 472245 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 35 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981211 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Faure, Marin" <Marin.Faure@PSS.Boeing.com> Date: Thu, 10 Dec 1998 09:14:47 -0800 Subject: Re: auto boxes From: Clinton Coates <ccoates@GOLDER.com> Date: Wed, 9 Dec 1998 11:28:00 -0800 Subject: auto boxes >Early RRs had a 3 speed auto 'box; when you drive it the engine really revs in each gear before it (chunkily) selects the next... Apparently the 3 speed auto is one of the more bulletproof offerings in the gearbox department. Can't remember who made the 'box. The three-speed automatic used by earlier model Range Rovers was a Chrysler unit. This transmission actually does not have a good reputation for reliability or longevity, and gave the automatic Range Rover a bad reputation back in those days. I believe, but am not positive, that Rover used a much better Chrysler automatic for a short time until switching in the late 1980s to a four-speed ZF transmission. For those of you who don't know, the "Z" in ZF stands for "Zeppelin," the same company that made the big airships back in the '20s and '30s. ZF is the gear division of the Zeppelin company, which is still very much alive today. The ZF transmission used in the Range Rover, Discovery, and US-spec Defenders is a derivative of the ZF unit used by BMW and Mercedes. Unlike the original Chrylser automatic (and the troublesome manual transmissions Land Rover used in the mid-'90s), the ZF automatics are about as bulletproof a unit as is possible to make. They are actually 4-1/2 speed units, as there is a lockup feature in fourth gear which mechanically connects the gear train and eliminates the transmission "slippage" for better fuel efficiency. Lockup occurs at just over 50 mph. The ZF transmission has changed many people's opinions about the automatic Range Rover. Buyers who wouldn't touch an auto Range Rover based on its initial reputation have found the ZF-equipped vehicle ! to be a delight to drive and extremely reliable. __________________ C. Marin Faure faurecm@halcyon.com marin.faure@boeing.com (original owner) 1973 Land Rover Series III-88 1991 Range Rover Vogue SE - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 36 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981211 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Alan_Richer@motorcity2.lotus.com Date: Thu, 10 Dec 1998 12:12:09 -0500 Subject: Re: Burnt No. 4 Intake Re: Swapping thermostats: After more thought, it seems like the readings might be caused by the lack of a blanking skirt. The ttemperature sensor is just below that area, so if coolant isn't exchanging properly with the radiator that might be a hot spot. If you can find it, the later thermostat housing and top (the iron bit that the bypass hose neck bolts to and the hose outlet that bolts above that) from a later Rover 2.25 will swap in exactly and work perfectly. That's what I've done to 2 earlier motors because of this paucity of early alcohol thermostats. Not exactly sure as I changed both bits, but perhaps even swapping the top alone might work - that's the bit that got modified to work with the newer-type thermostat. Considering you're in the UK, the bits should cost you about 5 quid. C'mon now, you needed to change your coolant anyway.....<grin> Pity you're not closer - i think I have one of the old alcohol thermostats lying about in my used-spares bin...not like I'm ever going to use it...8*) ajr - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 37 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981211 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: AKBLACKLEY@aol.com Date: Thu, 10 Dec 1998 12:11:26 EST Subject: Occassional Missing V8 Every so often when I go to start my 83 RR nothing happens. I open the hood (bonnet) and find that the engine has gone missing - empty space - nada. If I close the hood and wait ten minutes or so it has reappeared and all is well. It doesnt seem to matter if the engines was hot or cold. Is there some localized problem with the time space continuum between the radiator and the bellhousing? Can I sue LRNA for this? I know I bought it (well) used and its grey market and all, but come on, this kind of defect is just unacceptable. I mean even Detroit can manage to avoid major space-time defects (look how many perfectly good engines sit in junked cars - for decades even!), why can't Solihull?! But seriously, the worst engine miss I've encountered was due to bad plug leads. They looked good and were fairly new, but had been removed and reinstalled several tiimes in the course of doing some major engine work. They were of the local auto parts store type, and apparently I had damaged them in removal (maybe I should stop yanking so hard....) . Anyway I overcame my cheapskate nature and popped for a proper set of new Lucas leads. That completely cured the problem. Also be sure that they are separated from each other and the rocker covers by using plastic separators. Cheers, Andy Blackley - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 38 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981211 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Faure, Marin" <Marin.Faure@PSS.Boeing.com> Date: Thu, 10 Dec 1998 09:29:43 -0800 Subject: Series IIa vs III From: Faye and Peter Ogilvie <ogilvi@hgea.org> Date: Wed, 09 Dec 1998 16:29:52 Subject: Re: easy choice for Simon >If you like plastic that falls apart, pieces blocking the airflow from the front vents, and can't shift a real transmission, then by all means buy the POS '72 series III. If you want a real rover, buy the '70 series IIa. You can tell I have no bias against the series III. Not long after I took delivery of my new Series III I noticed that there seemed to be no valid reason for the metal dashboard panel that blocked half of the right-hand bulkhead vent. I took a saw to it and neatly doubled the size of the opening in the panel, which lets in a lot more air as you're driving. There's not much you can do to increase the airflow from the left-hand vent as it is partially blocked by the instrument panel. The tropical roof kept the interior of the vehicle from getting hot in Hawaii, but it did get stuffy, so I installed a 12-volt fan next to the upper right corner of the windshield with a switch on the dash. So there are a few things you can do to improve the airfow inside a Series III. But Peter's point about the Series IIa is well taken, and besides, with the IIa you get headlights mounted where God intended them to be. __________________ C. Marin Faure faurecm@halcyon.com marin.faure@boeing.com (original owner) 1973 Land Rover Series III-88 1991 Range Rover Vogue SE - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 39 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981211 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Faure, Marin" <Marin.Faure@PSS.Boeing.com> Date: Thu, 10 Dec 1998 10:07:19 -0800 Subject: Re: Burnt No. 4 Intake From: "The Stockdales" <mstockdale@mho.net> Date: Wed, 9 Dec 1998 20:22:34 -0800 Subject: Burnt No. 4 Intake >Two months ago I pestered you about burning the No. 4 Intake valve for the fourth time. Many replies said cooling problem, many said I was a fool for running it down the Hiway at 70+ MPH - 100 miles each day. Well I am finally getting around to fixing the Dinosaur and have to ask the same questions again (lost my hard-drive&no backup). This is not going to be what you wanted to hear. Based on my experience with the 2.25 engine and the experience of several mechanic friends in the UK who have worked on Land Rovers a lot longer than I've owned them (25 years) I would agree with the folks who say the cause of your problem is driving it at 70+ mph. The redline of the engine is 4,250 rpm. To get 70 mph out of it, even with an overdrive, you're going to be pretty darn close to the redline, maybe 4,000 rpm or so. If you're running taller tires, that will reduce the rpm needed but it will increase the amount of work the engine needs to do to maintain that speed, which will increase the heat generated by the engine. Regardless, you're asking an agricultural engine designed as a slow-revving diesel in the late '50s to do the work of a modern, lightweight, high-revving engine of today. (I assume you are aware that the petrol 2.25 was derived from the 2.25 diesel, which actually came first.) Actually, I'm amazed you're getting as much as two years out of your valves if that's the way you're using the vehicle. The Series Land Rovers were all designed during a time of relatively low road speeds; continuous fast driving on motorways or freeways was not part of the design criteria. A cruising speed of 45-50 mph was considered just fine by the Land Rover (and Jeep, too, back then) engineers. I know you're hoping for a technical solution to your "problem," better cooling, a different anti-freeze mix, or whatever. But based on the description of how you're using the vehicle, it is my opinion that you're simply asking too much of an engine that was never intended to be used the way you're using it. It's an old, low-tech design, and unless you drive it that way, you're going to have problems. If I had a hundred dollars for every Series owner I've met or talked to over the last ten years who thinks they've bought a "modern" 4wd with a funky body, I could afford that new Defender 130 Crew Cab I've always wanted, along with the bribe required to let Customs allow it into the country. They drive them like they would a more modern vehicle and then wonder why they have so many problems with the engines and drive trains. Drive them (and maintain them) the way they were designed to be driven and a Series will last damn near forever. Mine certainly has; I fully expect it to be running when gasoline is declared an illegal substance. But I rarely take the engine over 3,000 rpm, and then only for short bursts of acceleration when merging into traffic and so on. If your job requires you to cover 100+ miles each day, and you have to travel at 70 mph or more to maintain a schedule, I'd say you're driving the wrong kind of vehicle. While I do not drive my Series III as much as I used to, for the first ten years of its life it was my only vehicle, and was driven every single day. In addition to daily driving, I used it for long trips to the Yukon, British Columbia, and Montana. Much of this was highway driving, but I kept the engine to 3,000 rpm which, with the overdrive, gave me between 50 and 55 mph. Sure, everything on the road passed me, but I never had any problems with the vehicle at all until it finally burned an exhaust valve at 125K miles. Since the 2.25 engine has a reputation for burning exhaust valves at 80K miles or less, I considered myself fortunate. I know you're having problems with an intake valve, but considering the way you're using the vehicle, you should consider yourself lucky that you're not burning the pistons (something the 2.6 NADA six-cylinder engine had a reputation for doing when driven at all hard). In my opinion, I think as long as you drive your Series the way you're driving it, you're going to have problems. I'm sure you don't agree with me, but I think you're simply asking too much of the hardware. __________________ C. Marin Faure faurecm@halcyon.com marin.faure@boeing.com (original owner) 1973 Land Rover Series III-88 1991 Range Rover Vogue SE - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 40 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981211 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: TeriAnn Wakeman <twakeman@cruzers.com> Date: Thu, 10 Dec 98 10:12:48 -0800 Subject: Re: babe magnets Cars are personality statements. There is a large female population segment who are country girls and prefer their friends and potential mates to share this trait. The Sales manager at Land Rover San Jose once told me that his dealership was selling more D90s to women then to men. Interestingly enough he said that most men come in to look at the Defenders & drive away in a new Discovery or Range ROver. When A woman came in for a Defender that is what she drove away in. When I look at people driving the common CJ or Wrangler jeeps I see a very high percentage of them are women. I think a series, 90 or 110 could be a very effective "babe" magnet if you fish in locations that women who think of themselves as country girls are more apt to hang out. Put your bait where the fish are and remember different varities of fish prefer different kinds of bait. TeriAnn Wakeman If you send me direct mail, please Santa Cruz, California start the subject line with TW - twakeman@cruzers.com I will be sure to read the message http://www.cruzers.com/~twakeman Walk in harmony with the earth and all her creatures and you will create beauty wherever you go. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 41 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981211 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: dbobeck@ushmm.org Date: Thu, 10 Dec 98 09:38:46 -0500 Subject: Re[2]: easy choice for Simon >If you like plastic that falls apart, pieces blocking the airflow from the >front vents, and can't shift a real transmission, then by all means buy the >POS '72 series III. >If you want a real rover, buy the '70 series IIa. You can tell I have no >bias against the series III. I would have to agree, although this SIII bashing has got to stop. I have had no problems with plastic bits on mine. I heard later ones had a plastic gear lever that kept breaking, but mine is all metal. As for the dash vents, it does pay to swap out the upper fascia with one from post '73 that has the holes cut out for the air vents. I don't know about the gearbox issue, I've driven the non-synchro box, and it isn't really that much different. My SIII box works much better if I double clutch on the down shift. I also like being able to shift into first while going down a steep hill. Doubt that can be done by most of you with non-synch boxes. If (er, ok, when) my SIII box goes, I will probably put in a 5-speed. If I had to do it over again i would look for a IIa with headlights in the grille. But I like my SIII just fine. All you SIII bashers are full of yourselves. I'll pit greenHELL against any one of em, anytime... heh heh later daveb - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 42 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981211 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
[digester: Removing section of: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; ] From: "Matthew J. Clement" <matt@home-mac.demon.co.uk> Date: Thu, 10 Dec 1998 18:52:32 -0000 Subject: Last chance to order UK plates before Xmas charset="iso-8859-1" Several people from this mailing list have been in touch to order = UK-style number plates in time for Christmas. With the heavy Christmas = mail rush, you'll need to order in the next few days if you want to = receive your plates in time for Christmas. Prices for the plates start at $19.95 for a modern-style, plastic plate = and $24.95 for traditional silver-on-black stamped aluminium plates. = Lettering/numbering on the plates is your choice, and there is an = information guide on my website to help you pick an appropriate number = if you are going for authenticity. All of the plates can be provided in = a number of sizes and shapes as well, including the modern oblong design = or the more traditional square design (US-sized plates and motorcycle = plates also available). [spamkill: [Cc]redit [Cc]ard input: %s] I am now able to offer secure online ordering and credit card facilities = [spamkill: [Cc]redit [Cc]ard input: %s] credit card - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 43 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981211 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Malcolm Woodruff <kap08@dial.pipex.com> Date: Thu, 10 Dec 1998 20:22:02 -0800 Subject: PKV Frank Elson may be interested to know that the subject of the occasional missing V8 is B790 PKV. A Brown and limestone CSW. Last night by chance it was parked on the verge at Beaulieu in front of B709 PKV a red CSW. Small world! Malcolm Woodruff - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 44 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981211 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: dbobeck@ushmm.org Date: Thu, 10 Dec 98 14:25:22 -0500 Subject: Re[2]: babe magnets >Put your bait where the fish are and remember different varities of fish >prefer different kinds of bait. Please, do we have to use *fish* for the analogy?...ugh... perish the thought dave - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 45 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981211 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: dbobeck@ushmm.org Date: Thu, 10 Dec 98 14:27:29 -0500 Subject: Re[2]: babe magnets/ALAN >Or was it perhaps that she recognized you from your picture on a certain T-Shir >she had seen somewhere??? Grunties? - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 46 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981211 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: dbobeck@ushmm.org Date: Thu, 10 Dec 98 14:32:49 -0500 Subject: Re[2]: babe magnets >Considering I've had attractive women alone in cars smiling and waving at me >on the highway, I agree on the concept that an LR may help one be more >attractive... >...'cause God knows it ain't my smiling face that's attracting 'em. >aj"Warthogs R' Us"r Just wait until you get Lucy the Range Rover on the road. You will have to fight them off with a stick! - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 47 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981211 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: dbobeck@ushmm.org Date: Thu, 10 Dec 98 14:39:33 -0500 Subject: Re: babe magnets > Summertime, 88", no top, downtown Ottawa in the market area... It >works...) Hmmm....Dixon with no top in an 88? I think they would all run the opposite direction... later dave - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 48 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981211 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: F.Lankenau@t-online.de (Dirk Lankenau) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 1998 21:35:31 +0100 Subject: Lankenau@Bigfoot.com please ad my e-mail adress given above to your mailing list. Best Regards Dirk Lankenau - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 49 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981211 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Shaun Oriold <soriold@worldchat.com> Date: Thu, 10 Dec 1998 16:29:34 -0500 Subject: Re: Can I sue? You cannot sue just because your diff. is now not working. As it has been stated you can complain and get the repair for free.- a letter to the head of ford saying you will never buy a ford product again as well as dispel your friends, family and colleagues should to do the trick. To sue (and win) you would need to have been injured because of negligence on behalf of the delinquent who diagnosed the problem. or if you miss work you could sue for damages. Shaun Neil Brownlee wrote: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 50 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981211 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Clinton Coates <ccoates@GOLDER.com> Date: Thu, 10 Dec 1998 11:04:00 -0800 Oh! sorry, a moment of inattention (actually its more like a lifetime). I took mine to MOMA here in ABQ and they rebuilt it and calibrated it in accordance with the wheel/tire radius and number of cable turns per mile. They charged $65 for that and they also fabricated a new cable using my old ends (these are a little special) for $40. I also had to replace the drive gear in the transfer case because the square hole in the old one was worn round. I got a used one from RN for $29. I guess I could have pulled the speedo apart and messed around with it trying to guess what was wrong but my fingers are not made for that kind of work. I know my (many) limitations. Clinton - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 51 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981211 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Clinton Coates <ccoates@GOLDER.com> Date: Thu, 10 Dec 1998 11:20:00 -0800 Subject: Peugeot Diesels If the other Peugeot diesels are anything like that engine, just get it. OK. I can add that to the list of glowing endorsements. BTW, what torque setting should I set the bolts on my shackles to? And, should I keep my freewheeling hubs or not.....? 8>) Clinton - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 52 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981211 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Clinton Coates <ccoates@GOLDER.com> Date: Thu, 10 Dec 1998 11:27:00 -0800 Subject: auto boxes and lockups Speaking of torque convertor lockups for the ZF tranny and others in high speed high gear. Why can't one have the same thing for low speed/low gear to eliminate slippage in the torque convertor for hill descents? Perhaps the problem would be that the engine could stall out if the speed gets too low? Auto boxes are greek to me. All I know is that if I ever buy a disco or rangie, it is going to have that ZF transmission. Gee, I wonder if they still use hydrogen....... Clinton - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 53 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981211 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "d.h.lowe" <dhlowe@idirect.com> Date: Thu, 10 Dec 1998 04:51:22 -0500 Subject: Re: Chrysler 727 Torqueflyte The SDI has a Borg Warner 65 auto box, which is essentially the same as the 66 which is in Jags and BMW`s > Thanks to everyone who responded, re: early Range Rover 3 speed > autos. Now I'm onto a good thing perhaps I can glean the following; > How did they attach it to the transfer case (I know... bolts), and > which transfer case did they use? If it is an LT95 effort then there > must have been an adaptor plate? > And... What auto 'box did they use in a Rover SD1? > And... Is there a 4 speed auto 'box that will fit in the same hole as [ truncated by list-digester (was 11 lines)] > And... Is there a 4 speed auto 'box that will fit in the same hole as > the Chrysler 727 Torqueflyte, using the same mountings? - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 54 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981211 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "d.h.lowe" <dhlowe@idirect.com> Date: Thu, 10 Dec 1998 05:06:24 -0500 Subject: Re: Occassional Missing V8 And did you make sure that #5 and #7 are not next to each other, Put #3 between them or you will get an induced miss fire. > Every so often when I go to start my 83 RR nothing happens. I open the hood > (bonnet) and find that the engine has gone missing - empty space - nada. If I > close the hood and wait ten minutes or so it has reappeared and all is well. > It doesnt seem to matter if the engines was hot or cold. Is there some > localized problem with the time space continuum between the radiator and the > bellhousing? Can I sue LRNA for this? I know I bought it (well) used and its > grey market and all, but come on, this kind of defect is just unacceptable. I [ truncated by list-digester (was 20 lines)] > completely cured the problem. Also be sure that they are separated from each > other and the rocker covers by using plastic separators. Cheers, Andy Blackley - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 55 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981211 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Malcolm Woodruff <kap08@dial.pipex.com> Date: Thu, 10 Dec 1998 22:15:10 -0800 Subject: LPG Series 3 Conversion David We converted our V8 110 at Easter it was so bad we had it taken out again and then a new conversion by a different company in July. We find that we get about 15% less mpg with gas. I think that fuel injection vehicles do better but this is typical with carburettors. Still it runs quieter, starts better in the morning and is cheaper. It is however much less forgiving in terms of timing etc. What engine have you got and whose conversion kit did you use? Malcolm Woodruff - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 56 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981211 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: dbobeck@ushmm.org Date: Thu, 10 Dec 98 17:23:45 -0500 Subject: Re: Peugeot Diesels >BTW, what torque setting should I set the bolts on my shackles to? >And, should I keep my freewheeling hubs or not.....? 8>) torque your freewheeling shackle bolts when you encounter rough terrain, otherwise torque your busings once every 500 miles or you will experience premature wear. (and the truck might too). Lock your shackles to prevent premature failure of the steering kingpins. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 57 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981211 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Garrick Brett Olsen <gbolsen@allina.com> Date: Tue, 8 Dec 98 16:37:52 PST Subject: Stalling My new as of 5 wk ago 1961 SWB was on the way to the storage place one cold (20F) morning. After starting fine and running for about 3 miles, it was sputtering and bucking at full throttle. Once I backed off, the motor smoothed out. This got progressively worse over the next mile with stuttering and bucking at lower rpm's. I tried some Iso-Heet. It was better then got worse. I got more gas (gauge and odometer don't work). -took 10.5 gallons!!! I thought I was just out of gas and took off... Same stuttering and bucking at even lower rpm's. I eventually stalled out and would not start. After being towed, it started again and then stalled at high revs. The idle was not rough. I tried it later that day with the temp about 40F- same problem. I have an excellent theory from a local Roverhead and the Rovers North phone guy- The 3 yr old Weber carb is icing up and no air gets in. Other info: There is also a replacement electric fuel pump and an in line filter. Also there is no breather from the valve cover to the carb. Any other theories to this sputter/buck??? -Rik Name: Garrick Brett Olsen E-mail: Garrick Brett Olsen <gbolsen@allina.com> Date: 12/8/98 Time: 04:37:52 PM This message was sent by Chameleon - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 58 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981211 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Joseph Broach <jbroach@selway.umt.edu> Date: Thu, 10 Dec 1998 16:14:40 -0700 Marin, as usual a very well thought out response, but I do question a few of your numbers... >I would agree with the folks who say the cause of your problem is driving >it at 70+ > mph. I agree that 70 is a bit much, especially with 10" drums all round and knackered swivels (oh, wait, I'm talking about SId here) >The redline of the engine is 4,250 rpm. To get 70 mph out of it, even >with an >overdrive, you're going to be pretty darn close to the redline, maybe >4,000 rpm >or so. Nah, at 70 with 7.5x16's and OD (which he surely has if he's going 70!), we're talking just a bit over 3000 RPMS or about 70% into the rev range. This shouldn't be a problem. Even with 30x9.5R15's, he'd only be turning 3300 RPM or so. >If you're running taller tires, that will reduce the rpm needed but it >will increase the amount of work the engine needs to do to maintain that >speed, >which will increase the heat generated by the engine. Don't know enough to comment on this one, though it does make sense. >Regardless, you're >asking an agricultural engine designed as a slow-revving diesel in the late >'50s to do the work of a modern, lightweight, high-revving engine of >today. (I >assume you are aware that the petrol 2.25 was derived from the >2.25 diesel, which >actually came first.) An excellent point, although the 2.25 petrol actually came first (1958, 1962 for the 2.25 diesel), designed around the 2.0 diesel. >Actually, I'm amazed you're getting as much as two years out of your >valves if >that's the way you're using the vehicle. The Series Land Rovers were all >designed during a time of relatively low road speeds; continuous fast driving >on motorways or freeways was not part of the design criteria. A cruising >speed >of 45-50 mph was considered just fine by the Land Rover (and Jeep, too, back >then) engineers. Makes me a bit worried since I'll be driving at (relatively) high speeds for about 5000-6000 miles per year in Sidney. >But I rarely take the engine over 3,000 rpm, and then only for short >bursts of >acceleration when merging into traffic and so on. If your job >requires you to cover >100+ miles each day, and you have to travel at 70 >mph or more to maintain a schedule, >I'd say you're driving the wrong kind >of vehicle. In the S**B circles I used to run in, it was often said that -not- consistently running the engine up towards the redline could be harmful for its health. Of course, these were higher revving 16v engines, and perhaps they were more prone to cylinder wall glazing than our beasties. One last note, weren't earlier 2.25's like the one presumably in the suspect SII known to be weaker in the cooling department? Maybe he should be looking for a later engine out of a IIa. -joseph and sidney (doesn't even have hardened seats, yet...) missoula, mt - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 59 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981211 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: John Cranfield <john.cranfield@ns.sympatico.ca> Date: Thu, 10 Dec 1998 19:27:37 -0400 Subject: Re: Stalling Take the top off the carb and clean all the jets and check the float level. John and Muddy Garrick Brett Olsen wrote: > My new as of 5 wk ago 1961 SWB was on the way to the storage place > one cold (20F) morning. After starting fine and running for about 3 > miles, it was sputtering and bucking at full throttle. Once I > backed off, the motor smoothed out. This got progressively worse > over the next mile with stuttering and bucking at lower rpm's. I > tried some Iso-Heet. It was better then got worse. I got more gas > (gauge and odometer don't work). -took 10.5 gallons!!! I thought I [ truncated by list-digester (was 25 lines)] > Date: 12/8/98 > Time: 04:37:52 P - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 60 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981211 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Paul Lonsdale <Lonsdale@compuserve.com> Date: Thu, 10 Dec 1998 18:49:41 -0500 Subject: Re:petrol by the pound << I thought they only put 'pounds' of fuel in planes - you should be using litres (or gallons) - that could be the problem (-: >> British Airways & Qantas refuel by the Kilo & pay in US Dollars. As opposed to any of the many other less valuable "Dollars". Paul Thu, 10 Dec 1998 19:12 Ex- H.M. Coastguard Series III 88 Inch "Dougal Mc Landie" B 895 OJT (1984) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 61 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981211 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Paul Lonsdale <Lonsdale@compuserve.com> Date: Thu, 10 Dec 1998 18:49:45 -0500 Subject: Re: Chrysler 727 Torqueflyte << What auto 'box did they use in a Rover SD1? >> Borg Warner Model 65 in the early ones (Solihull built), and a GM "Strasbourg" in the later ones ( Cowley built). The later SD1 is a far better built vehicle. (I had one of each!) Paul Thu, 10 Dec 1998 20:29 Ex- H.M. Coastguard Series III 88 Inch "Dougal Mc Landie" B 895 OJT (1984) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 62 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981211 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Frank Elson" <frankelson@felson.freeserve.co.uk> Date: Thu, 10 Dec 1998 19:41:15 -0000 Subject: Re: New Landies (Girlfriends) Oh yes.... (VERY BIG GRIN BACK!!!!!) mind you, when she leaned over the table......... Best Cheers Frank +--+--+--+ I !__| [_]|_\___ I ____|"_|"__|_ | / B791 PKV "(o)======(o)" Bronze Green 110 CSW - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 63 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981211 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Frank Elson" <frankelson@felson.freeserve.co.uk> Date: Thu, 10 Dec 1998 20:10:56 -0000 Subject: Re: who's mad? Simon, I don't see your problem. Get 'em both, or can't your wife drive? Best Cheers Frank +--+--+--+ I !__| [_]|_\___ I ____|"_|"__|_ | / B791 PKV "(o)======(o)" Bronze Green 110 CSW - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 64 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981211 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Frank Elson" <frankelson@felson.freeserve.co.uk> Date: Fri, 11 Dec 1998 00:14:36 -0000 Subject: Re: PKV Malcolm, we surely must get a club going one day, I know of four other PKVs.... Seems like the two you mentioned may have come from the same batch as mine. In case you don't know the history I was told that in 1984, when the Ninety was announced the 100 also got the wind-up windows. All the 1983 vehicles with the sliding windows (I've heard figures from 12 to 20) still hanging around in showrooms were bought back by Land Rover, registered (hence the Land Rover PKV number ) and sold as a bunch through Bristol Street Motors. If you are at Billing next year let's get 'em together for a pic... Best Cheers Frank +--+--+--+ I !__| [_]|_\___ I ____|"_|"__|_ | / B791 PKV "(o)======(o)" Bronze Green 110 CSW - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 65 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981211 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Frank Elson" <frankelson@felson.freeserve.co.uk> Date: Fri, 11 Dec 1998 00:19:16 -0000 Subject: Re: Peugeot Diesels and don't forget you MUST use grease (or oil) in the swivel housings Best Cheers Frank +--+--+--+ I !__| [_]|_\___ I ____|"_|"__|_ | / B791 PKV "(o)======(o)" Bronze Green 110 CSW - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 66 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981211 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: James Wolf <J.Wolf@worldnet.att.net> Date: Thu, 10 Dec 1998 21:36:59 Subject: BRAKES >Another quick Master Cylinder question: >The instructions recommend using some Girling Brake grease on the end cap >seal and the seals. >The only Girling brake grease I have comes in a yellow tube, is green and is >recommended for mechanical parts such as the end of shoes... specifically >"not for parts in contact with brake fluid" Is there an alternative? Is is >necessary? Charles, Charles, you need some of the silicon paste that comes in a plain white tube from Rovers North. You may also find it at the parts store. Long ago when one purchased master, wheel and slave cylinder kits there would be a small tube of said grease, but alas that has not been the case for sometime now. Jim Wolf - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 67 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981211 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Peter M. Kaskan" <pmk11@cornell.edu> Date: Thu, 10 Dec 1998 20:42:14 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: Mighty Joe Young! >Wow! Just saw a preview last night for the new Disney flick "Mighty Joe >Young." They showed no less than SIX Land Rovers in the preview! Three >109s, two 88s and a IIB or a 101 way in the background. This is gonna >be quite a movie for us Rover-geeks with no lives! >One bad note, they did show the gorilla smashing and knocking over a >109" that was chasing him. Oh well . . . :) That's cool, I suppose, but I don't think I can stomach any Di&^%$y flicks, despite the presence of several of our lovley friends. IMHO - Peter Peter M. Kaskan Uris Hall 231 Office / 607-255-3382 Dept. Of Psychology Lab / 607-255-6396 Cornell University e-mail / pmk11@cornell.edu Ithaca NY 14853 http://comp9.psych.cornell.edu/graduates/people/PeterM.Kaskan.htm http://comp9.psych.cornell.edu/psychology/finlay/finlaylab.html - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 68 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981211 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Peter M. Kaskan" <pmk11@cornell.edu> Date: Thu, 10 Dec 1998 20:55:38 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: BRAKES Jim Wolf wrote... >Charles, Charles, you need some of the silicon paste that comes in a plain >white tube from Rovers North. You may also find it at the parts store. Long >ago when one purchased master, wheel and slave cylinder kits there would be >a small tube of said grease, but alas that has not been the case for >sometime now. Hi Guys - Every time I order a brake rebuild kit from RN it comes with a packet of Girling red brake grease. Once you've ordered enough brake rebuild kits (What? Didn't work the first time?) you'll have a few of those cute little tin packets sitting around ; ) Should you really be smearing silley-cone paste near your nice new aluminum cylinders?! Bye - P Peter M. Kaskan Uris Hall 231 Office / 607-255-3382 Dept. Of Psychology Lab / 607-255-6396 Cornell University e-mail / pmk11@cornell.edu Ithaca NY 14853 http://comp9.psych.cornell.edu/graduates/people/PeterM.Kaskan.htm http://comp9.psych.cornell.edu/psychology/finlay/finlaylab.html - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 69 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981211 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: James Wolf <J.Wolf@worldnet.att.net> Date: Thu, 10 Dec 1998 21:48:47 Subject: posting >>can someone please mail me a primer on how to properly compose a note to >>the list >Were a fairly light hearted bunch out here - unless you bring up issues like; >grease vs. oil in the hubs or swivels - or some other hotly debated topic. >>and how to properly reply to another's post without annoying >>list members/receiving my posts back? >Didn't P sombody O already did you?! ; ) [ truncated by list-digester (was 10 lines)] >Didn't P sombody O already did you?! ; ) >Anyway - hellos and welcomes - Peter Peter how could you leave out the "LOCKING FRONT HUBS'? Jim Wolf - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 70 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981211 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Peter M. Kaskan" <pmk11@cornell.edu> Date: Thu, 10 Dec 1998 21:34:54 -0500 (EST) Recently - We've had a few questions about how to post... Here is what to do... Don't include a subject heading - Those just like, suck. Exclaim things in big caps when you've got a FACT we all should know, like; YO, YOUS ALL GOT TO LEAVE THEM FRONT FREEWHELLIN' HUBS UNLOCKED! and... HEY! IF YOU DON'T TORQUE THOSE GOD DAMN SHACKLE BOLTS SOO TIGHT THAT THEY SNAP OFF - YOU'LL BE IN TROUBLE OUT ON THE F-ING RUBY-CON! and... ROVER RECCOMENDED, LIKE BACK IN THE 50'S, THAT ONLY STAINLESS FASTENERS SHOULD BE USED WITH Al PANELS - YOU DUMBASSES! THE ONLY REASON THEY DIDN'T IS BECAUSE IT WAS USED UP IN WWII! and... DIFFS MUST BE PACKED WITH GREASE! HUBS WITH 90Wt! YOU'VE ALL GOT IT ALL BACKWARDS! and... WHY DO YOU ALL DRINK GUINESS? THAT STUFF TASTES LIKE ASPHALT! Peter - [ I've no f-ing idea about my shackle torque settings! Alls I can say is it starts, gets me there, gets me home, usually, unless I've had too much Guiness ] - Kaskan but maybe I should really get my freewheel grease/oil mix guinessed to spec. BTW - IIA are better - none o' those cheapo little plastic bits o' $h!t Just Kidding... Just Kidding... : ) Peter M. Kaskan Uris Hall 231 Office / 607-255-3382 Dept. Of Psychology Lab / 607-255-6396 Cornell University e-mail / pmk11@cornell.edu Ithaca NY 14853 http://comp9.psych.cornell.edu/graduates/people/PeterM.Kaskan.htm http://comp9.psych.cornell.edu/psychology/finlay/finlaylab.html - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 71 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981211 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Paul Oxley <paul@adventures.co.za> Date: Fri, 11 Dec 1998 05:18:45 +0200 Subject: Re: Stalling Garrick Brett Olsen wrote: > Any other theories to this sputter/buck??? How 'bout that your fuel line from the tank to the pump to the filter to the carb is shot? Regards Paul Oxley http://AfricanAdrenalin.co.za http://Adventures.co.za - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 72 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981211 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: DNDANGER@aol.com Date: Thu, 10 Dec 1998 23:22:22 EST Subject: Re: Babes did 11a's In a message dated 98-12-10 09:29:12 EST, you write: Good luck with the diminutive beast, and whatever you do, for god's sake, DO NOT EVER ask the list about schackle torques... Cheers, Cole Stage, Hefelump herder IIa ambulance >> Or how to spell shackle. Bill Lawrence - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 73 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981211 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: DNDANGER@aol.com Date: Thu, 10 Dec 1998 23:35:06 EST Subject: Re: babe magnets In a message dated 98-12-10 10:48:36 EST, you write: Markus asks if she was waving because my LR was on fire.... or for sympathy reasons... >> Oh no a pity wave! I hate it when that happens. Bill Lawrence - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 74 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981211 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Faye and Peter Ogilvie <ogilvi@hgea.org> Date: Thu, 10 Dec 1998 20:21:24 Subject: Re: Side curtains forever!!! Now this guy is a real girlie man. Roll up windows, next thing he'll be trying is power steering and an automatic!!!!! Truthfully, roll up windows are greatly over rated and certainly not worth the money to fix. The slider's in the series keep the wind off the side of your head and not blowing into your face while providing very adequate ventilation. Roll up windows never seem to have a position that provides a balance between ventilation and wind blast. I say that living in Kona where a cold winter day is 75 degrees, by the way. If you really want a feeling of open air living with the top on, simply remove the windows in your rover. Not recommended in Michigan this time of year, however. If you want a condemnation of roll up windows, look what happened to British Sports Cars when they abandoned side curtains, MGB/TR4, absolutely no soul. Aloha Peter >Owner of an SIII and a Triumph with roll-up windows. >(And tired of SGS-suffering cretins who seem to think I'm not > good enough to be in their club(s) because I have syncros > and/or no sidecurtains.) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 75 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981211 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Skhar1927@aol.com Date: Fri, 11 Dec 1998 01:35:28 EST Subject: who's mad frank elson didn't see the problem: buy both? if i could i would!!! one will be quite enough, im sure. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 76 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981211 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Skhar1927@aol.com Date: Fri, 11 Dec 1998 01:39:04 EST Subject: who's mad frank elson wanted to know if my wife can drive a stick (standard transmission, that is). She can't. (drive a manual shifted transmission that is). THAT is the beauty of the whole thing. I get a great vehicle that will keep me occupied when I have my daily 15 minutes of free time, and SHE CANT DRIVE IT(the rover, that is). simon harding. still pining for my rover, leaning toward series IIa. but need to buy something significant for the wife first. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 77 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981211 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
[spamkill: @yahoo\. input: %s] Return-Path: <smithdv1@yahoo.com> From: Dale Smith <smithdv1@yahoo.com> Date: Fri, 11 Dec 1998 13:14:34 +0800 (SGT) Subject: test Has anyone heard of any updates on the grill badges? Thanks Smitty - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 78 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981211 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Steve Mace" <steve@solwise.co.uk> Date: Fri, 11 Dec 1998 08:25:56 -0000 Subject: Re: Burnt No. 4 Intake I've just order from the local LR dealer the correct stat. It costs 7GBP so it better work. So far this mucking around has cost me two stats. from Paddocks and one stat. from a local factors - I'm starting a nice little collection! Anyway LR assure me that they can supply the correct one but it won't be here until Monday. If I'd known then what I now now I would have got the alternative housing and used the newer type. Anyway if the part from LR works then that's good enough for me - the esisting ones been on for 27 years so if the new one lasts as long I won't worry! Thanks... On 10 Dec 98, at 12:12, Alan_Richer@motorcity2.lotus. wrote: > After more thought, it seems like the readings might be caused by the lack of a > blanking skirt. The ttemperature sensor is just below that area, so if coolant > isn't exchanging properly with the radiator that might be a hot spot. > If you can find it, the later thermostat housing and top (the iron bit that the > bypass hose neck bolts to and the hose outlet that bolts above that) from a > later Rover 2.25 will swap in exactly and work perfectly. That's what I've done > to 2 earlier motors because of this paucity of early alcohol thermostats. [ truncated by list-digester (was 12 lines)] > might work - that's the bit that got modified to work with the newer-type > thermostat. Name: Dr Steve Mace E-mail: steve@solwise.co.uk www: http://www.solwise.co.uk Tel: +44 1482 473899 Fax: +44 1482 472245 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 79 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981211 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
END OF * LIST DIGEST Input: messages 78 lines 3461 [forwarded 265 whitespace 0] Output: lines 2280 [content 1938 forwarded 204 (cut 61) whitespace 0][ First Message | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981211 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Digest Messages Copyright 1990-1999 by the original poster or/and Empire Rover Owners Society, All rights reserved. Photos & text Copyright 1990-1999 Bill Caloccia, All rights reserved. Empire/LRO List of charges for Empire/LRO Policies
against the distribution of unsolicited commercial e-mail (aka SPAM).
|
![]() |
|||
<--Back |
HOME |
TOP |
Forward --> |
|