[ First Message Last | Table of Contents | <- Digest -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
msg | Sender | lines | Subject |
1 | "Johan van Staden" [jcvs | 21 | Fuel pump oil seal |
2 | TeriAnn Wakeman [twakema | 27 | Re: Fuel pump oil seal |
3 | Alan_Richer@motorcity2.l | 15 | Re: Fuel pump oil seal |
4 | Ray Harder [ccray@showme | 19 | Re: Fuel pump oil seal |
5 | "Peter M. Kaskan" [pmk11 | 48 | Info on Heaters |
6 | bobnsueb@maxinet.com (Bo | 18 | manuals |
7 | bobnsueb@maxinet.com (Bo | 23 | Positive Crancase Ventilation valve |
8 | "Neil Sheridan" [neilshe | 35 | Stainless Steel Window Channels |
9 | "Neil Sheridan" [neilshe | 29 | Alan Bishop's Halogen Question |
10 | "A. P. \"Sandy\" Grice" | 29 | Lucas A1811 Alternator |
11 | "A. P. \"Sandy\" Grice" | 46 | Emission plumbing |
12 | CIrvin1258@aol.com | 30 | Re: Positive Crancase Ventilation valve |
13 | CIrvin1258@aol.com | 16 | Re: Re[2]: PCP^hV |
14 | dbobeck@ushmm.org | 28 | Re[2]: Positive Crancase Ventilation valve |
15 | NADdMD@aol.com | 15 | PCV: I'll do it my way... |
16 | dbobeck@ushmm.org | 37 | Re: Emission plumbing |
17 | "Russell G. Dushin" [rgd | 25 | Stainless Window Channel |
18 | Alan_Richer@motorcity2.l | 30 | Re: Emission plumbing |
19 | "Faure, Marin" [Marin.Fa | 65 | Re: Charcoal Cannister |
20 | dbobeck@ushmm.org | 12 | Re[2]: Emission plumbing |
21 | Alan_Richer@motorcity2.l | 14 | Re: Re[2]: Emission plumbing |
22 | dbobeck@ushmm.org | 18 | Re[2]: Charcoal Cannister |
23 | "Faure, Marin" [Marin.Fa | 55 | Re: Rewiring for Halogen conversion. |
24 | "Steve Rochna" [rover@ma | 10 | Nevada Trophy |
25 | dbobeck@ushmm.org | 15 | Re[4]: Emission plumbing |
26 | Lodelane@aol.com | 14 | Re: PCV: I'll do it my way... |
27 | asfco [asfco@banet.net> | 22 | Re: Stainless Window Channel |
28 | kevin.murphy@ps.ge.com | 32 | RE: Nevada Trophy |
29 | "Wolfe, Charles" [CWolfe | 11 | RE: Hub Castleated Nut - Oops!? |
30 | "Peter Hope" [phope@hawa | 15 | Re: Stainless Window Channel |
31 | asfco [asfco@banet.net> | 20 | Re: Stainless Window Channel |
32 | "Russell G. Dushin" [rgd | 24 | Re: Stainless Window Tracking |
33 | "Frank Elson" [frankelso | 25 | Re: block heaters |
34 | "Frank Elson" [frankelso | 16 | Re: Seetbeltz and seetz |
35 | "Frank Elson" [frankelso | 21 | Re: Burbank Ca. |
36 | "Wolfe, Charles" [CWolfe | 41 | Ethics 101 |
37 | John Cranfield [john.cra | 30 | Re: Ethics 101 |
38 | jimfoo@uswest.net | 10 | spiders |
39 | "Wise Owl Innovation Inc | 21 | Re: horn buttton |
40 | "Peter Hope" [phope@hawa | 14 | Re: Ethics 101 |
41 | DNDANGER@aol.com | 25 | Re: Happy Holiday freom over the watere.. |
42 | William Leacock [wleacoc | 10 | John Hong |
43 | William Leacock [wleacoc | 12 | Heater identification |
44 | "Todd" [tingsle@banet.ne | 85 | I make $45/hour doing this! Free Software! |
45 | Jeremy Bartlett [bartlet | 17 | Re: Ethics 101 |
46 | DNDANGER@aol.com | 22 | Re: SOV's |
47 | DNDANGER@aol.com | 14 | Re: Non-charging solved |
48 | DNDANGER@aol.com | 23 | Re: Hesitating Rover |
49 | David Cockey [dcockey@ti | 34 | Re: Heater identification |
50 | "Todd" [tingsle@banet.ne | 85 | I make $45/hour doing this! Free Software! |
51 | Clinton Coates [ccoates@ | 41 | RE: Block heaters and seetz |
52 | Rovergo@aol.com | 12 | Re: burbank ca. |
53 | DNDANGER@aol.com | 26 | Re: block heaters |
54 | DNDANGER@aol.com | 22 | Re: CB Master Cylinder 88 vs 109. |
55 | Lawrence Lee [lawrencele | 24 | Re: Hesitating Rover |
From: "Johan van Staden" <jcvs@postino.up.ac.za> Date: Tue, 1 Dec 1998 16:18:00 +0200 Subject: Fuel pump oil seal I need to replace the little rubber oil seal inside the fuel pump of a SII 2.25 4 cylinder Land Rover. The fuel pump kit obtainable locally does not contain this seal. The dealers want me to buy a new fuel pump. One would expect this kind of thing from other cars, but not from Land Rover. The seal is easily accessible, should be cheap, and is a piece of cake to replace, only nobody has it. I could not find a part number either. Could list readers please direct me to source for this thingy or perhaps suggest an alternative solution. It is a matter of principle. Johan van Staden Gold Fields Computer Centre for Education Faculty of Science, University of Pretoria Pretoria, 0002 South Africa Tel: +12 420 2470 Fax; +12 420 3874 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 2 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981202 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: TeriAnn Wakeman <twakeman@cruzers.com> Date: Tue, 1 Dec 98 06:35:12 -0800 Subject: Re: Fuel pump oil seal >I need to replace the little rubber oil seal inside the fuel pump of a SII >2.25 4 cylinder Land Rover. ; For some unknown reason they evidently made the seal out of a material called unobtainioum. The the best of my knowledge they are completely unobtainable. However, around five years ago one of our local legends, Ben Smith, made a field repair of his fuel pump using a dust cover seal from a wheel cylinder rebuild kit. It is my understanding that the temperary seal is still in there working fine. TeriAnn Wakeman If you send me direct mail, please Santa Cruz, California start the subject line with TW - twakeman@cruzers.com I will be sure to read the message http://www.cruzers.com/~twakeman Walk in harmony with the earth and all her creatures and you will create beauty wherever you go. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 3 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981202 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Alan_Richer@motorcity2.lotus.com Date: Tue, 1 Dec 1998 09:35:40 -0500 Subject: Re: Fuel pump oil seal Re: Seal: Dunno as I've ever seen a source for it, but a friend of mine (hello Ben Smith!) used the cup from a brake rebuild kit, punched with a suitable hole, for one for a few years and he said it worked nicely. Ben, care to elaborate? ajr - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 4 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981202 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Ray Harder <ccray@showme.missouri.edu> Date: Tue, 1 Dec 1998 08:36:52 -0600 (CST) Subject: Re: Fuel pump oil seal On Tue, 1 Dec 1998, Johan van Staden wrote: > Subject: Fuel pump oil seal > alternative solution. It is a matter of principle. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ johan, is it me getting older, or society changing without me. i am bumping into this more and more on the order of 2-3 times per week. i feel like walter in 'the big labonski' i'm all for you -- hope you can find a good solution... Sincerely, Ray Harder - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 5 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981202 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Peter M. Kaskan" <pmk11@cornell.edu> Date: Tue, 1 Dec 1998 10:34:39 -0500 (EST) Subject: Info on Heaters I found some info I thought you all might be interested in; DREISON INTERNATIONAL MARADYNE MOBILE PRODUCTS 6501 Barberton Ave; Cleveland, OH USA 44102 (216) 281-7810 I have the model 6500 and (I think) 6000, which you should see on this link; http://www.heco.net/Heaters.html Other info I turned up, which I didn't last fall; ESPAR, INC 6435 Kestrel Rd; Mississauga, ONT CAN L5T 1Z8 (800) 387-4800 Fax: (905) 670-0728 MOBIL CLIMATE CONTROL, INC 30 Ritin Lane; Concord, ONT CAN L4K 4C5 (905) 738-0820 PHILLIPS & TEMRO INDUSTRIES, INC 9700 W 74th St; Eden Prairie, MN USA 55345 (612) 941-9700 Fax: (612) 941-2285 RACOR, DIVISION OF PARKER HANNIFIN CORPORATION 3400 Finch Rd, PO Box 3208; Modesto, CA USA 95353 (800) 344-3286 (209) 521-7860 Fax: (209) 529-3278 RED DOT CORPORATION PO Box 58270; Seattle, WA USA 98138 (206) 575-3840 Hope that helps - Peter Peter M. Kaskan Uris Hall 231 Office / 607-255-3382 Dept. Of Psychology Lab / 607-255-6396 Cornell University e-mail / pmk11@cornell.edu Ithaca NY 14853 http://comp9.psych.cornell.edu/graduates/people/PeterM.Kaskan.htm http://comp9.psych.cornell.edu/psychology/finlay/finlaylab.html - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 6 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981202 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: bobnsueb@maxinet.com (Bob and Sue Bernard) Date: Tue, 01 Dec 1998 07:37:22 -0800 Subject: manuals >From: "Bishop, Alan" <A.Bishop@worc.ac.uk> >Date: Mon, 30 Nov 1998 15:57:28 +0000 >Subject: Re: Non-charging solved Hi Alan, I have the shop manuals and also the Haynes, The Haynes that I have has a wiring diagram that appears to be a copy of the shop manual and is a little larger and easier to read. In fact the Haynes seems to be a pretty good book for most things. Here in the states, we have chilton for most cars and it is pretty miserable compared to Haynes. Bob B - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 7 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981202 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: bobnsueb@maxinet.com (Bob and Sue Bernard) Date: Tue, 01 Dec 1998 07:46:04 -0800 Subject: Positive Crancase Ventilation valve >From: CIrvin1258@aol.com >Date: Mon, 30 Nov 1998 12:20:11 EST >Subject: Re: PCV system > engine or the 67 in my 88 have PCV - however the 72 SIII engine I just >swapped > out had it. >Tough one: I've personally seen '64-'65 MGB's/TR-4's with OEM PCV valves, but >it memory serves me well, they weren't really mandated until 1967 - 1968 MGB's >went to air rails/pumps, 1970 saw the dreaded charcoal cannisters. At least, >this is how it went here in Kalifornia. My California 69 had the pcv but no cannister, a 70 also had the cannister. I don't understand what is the flame trap that Nate >NADdMD@aol.com<, refers to. Unless it's incase you live too close to DBobeck. :^) Bob B - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 8 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981202 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Neil Sheridan" <neilsheridan@nac.net> Date: Tue, 1 Dec 1998 10:46:33 -0500 Subject: Stainless Steel Window Channels Hi All! I went looking for a "ship's chandler" to find the stainless steel window channels as has been recommended on the list and the FAQ. Here in the NYC harbor area, a chandler is a firm that specializes in repairing ocean-going freighters and battleships, etc. Perhaps inland and overseas it relates to a more recreational boat repair shop. Instead, go to any marina and ask to see their parts catalogues for boat hardware. I paid $2.20 a foot after haggling a bit. Very thin metal walls that look more like chrome, but nice nylon strip for the bottom runner and durable-looking nylon fuzz on the sidewalls. No apparent biological materials to support moss growth, rot, and rust but I suppose that given time and dusty winds the right conditions to support life could develop. I have taken the skins off a new set of doortops to galvanize them, then will install the channels. Hopefully the windows will be sliding when desired long after gasoline has disappeared from the planet. Due to the amount of time I'm putting into the truck, I've stopped reading the list regularly. If anyone wants to drop me a line please write directly. Thanks, Neil Sheridan - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 9 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981202 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Neil Sheridan" <neilsheridan@nac.net> Date: Tue, 1 Dec 1998 10:35:16 -0500 Subject: Alan Bishop's Halogen Question Alan Bishop writes about using halogen headlamp bulbs... Alan, I left my headlights stock and picked up a pair of Hella driving lights (for on-road use to supplement the high beams). Comes with all the relays and easy color coded instructions for wiring. About US60 here, but I imagine that there are similar kits. Look for a simple round housing 7 - 8". I made a bar that I bolted through the framehorns, but if you still have your valance, you could use that. I thought a prepared kit was a better idea than experimentation. Any questions, feel free to write back direct. I'm so busy trying to reassemble the Rover, I hardly read the list at all. Incidentally, I bought the kit because the headlights were so dim. When I replaced the Lucas generator with a 63 amp alternator and replaced the high/low floor switch, my lights seemingly doubled in brightness. Neil Sheridan 65 IIA 88 "Dreadnought" 56 I 109 "Anti-Christine" - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 10 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981202 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "A. P. \"Sandy\" Grice" <rover@pinn.net> Date: Tue, 01 Dec 1998 11:10:30 -0500 Subject: Lucas A1811 Alternator "Peter M. Kaskan" <pmk11@cornell.edu> wrote: >Anybody using one of these in a series? It supposedly puts out 43 amps. >What do you think is the max draw that can be safely drawn without early >burnout? Yup...I'm running with a Lucas ACR18...and 43 amps sounds about right. Came as original equipment on some Jags of the same period. Same dimensions as the ACR16, just a few more turns of wire, I suppose. If your vehicle exceeds this in current draw, you start sucking juice out of the battery. Years ago, I tried to figure out the vehicle's total electrical load *before* hooking up additional lighting. Anybody else done the math? *----jeep may be famous, LAND-ROVER is Legendary----* | | | A. P. ("Sandy") Grice | | Rover Owners' Association of Virginia, Ltd. | | Association of North American Rover Clubs | | 1633 Melrose Pkwy., Norfolk, VA 23508-1730 | |(O)757-622-7054, (H)757-423-4898, FAX 757-622-7056 | | | | (original owner) (pre-production) | *----1972 Series III------1996 Discovery SE-7(m)----* - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 11 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981202 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "A. P. \"Sandy\" Grice" <rover@pinn.net> Date: Tue, 01 Dec 1998 11:10:32 -0500 Subject: Emission plumbing Stude, Herman L." <HermanS@krts.com> wrote: >I'm new to all this emmissions plumbing stuff, on my SIII 88 petrol I've >got this little canister that looks like it has some sort of vent hose >attached. In theory what does it do and what is the correct plumbing, >and what happens if I yank it? It does not appear in my official LR >manuals. This stuff came about with the Series III. There is a vent on the top of the fuel tank that runs across the frame to a trapezoidal "expansion tank" tucked up under the wheel arch on the left side. A stiff plastic tube runs from the top of that to the charcoal canister. In theory, any excess petrol fumes will condense in the expansion tank and drain back. The fuel tank is vented through the same plumbing, as the filler cap is supposedly a "sealed" type (three external locking lugs). and Dave B. wrote: >where does the PCV vlave go into the manifold? on my manifold there is >only one place for this and that is in front of the carb, where the brake >booster hose attaches. There is an additional aluminium "spacer" about 3/8 or 1/2" thick at the base of the carb and I don't mean that bakelite piece that separates the carb and the manifold. The PCV valve is tapped into this piece. This also make a convenient place if you are going to add that Ampco oil injector (1940's technology that helps us with non-stellite heads survive in this world of unleaded petrol) >connecting the PCV valve to the mainfold side of the equation >means that only one or two cylinders are gettting the blow-by fumes, and >may potentially be running slighlty differently, or getting a build up >of crud (?) in them. I think. Exactly...which is why you have to go to the carb base so the funkus can be distributed evenly to all four cylinders. As I recall a few months (years?) back, someone was having carb icing problems and the proper PCV valve/cover breather plumbing fixed it.... Cheers - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 12 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981202 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: CIrvin1258@aol.com Date: Tue, 1 Dec 1998 11:14:31 EST Subject: Re: Positive Crancase Ventilation valve In a message dated 98-12-01 10:45:30 EST, you write: << My California 69 had the pcv but no cannister, a 70 also had the cannister. I don't understand what is the flame trap that Nate >NADdMD@aol.com<, refers to. Unless it's incase you live too close to DBobeck. :^) >> This is getting interesting: '68/'69 B's DID NOT have a PCV valve, but rather, a gulp valve, and a check valve (or, extra air valve)! The PCV was discontinued in favor of this setup, along with the air rail/air pump. The former was mounted on top of the intake manifold and had hoses running from the manifold to it, then to the air pump, and a vacum line from it, to the front carb: the latter was mounted in-line on the air rail. Of course, previous owners being what they are... The charcoal cannister from 1970-on, was part of an "fuel evaporative-loss" system, in which (I believe) fumes from the fuel tank would run through it, and the filtered air from the cannister, would feed back into the intake manifold...or something like that Charles - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 13 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981202 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: CIrvin1258@aol.com Date: Tue, 1 Dec 1998 11:18:06 EST Subject: Re: Re[2]: PCP^hV In a message dated 98-11-30 15:57:17 EST, you write: << True, but can it be done for less than the $120-150 it would cost me to get a >PCV assembly and associated rigging? >> ...Just one more reason why I love my diesel! Charles - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 14 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981202 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: dbobeck@ushmm.org Date: Tue, 01 Dec 98 11:43:07 -0500 Subject: Re[2]: Positive Crancase Ventilation valve In a message dated 98-12-01 10:45:30 EST, you write: << My California 69 had the pcv but no cannister, a 70 also had the cannister. I don't understand what is the flame trap that Nate >NADdMD@aol.com<, refers to. Unless it's incase you live too close to DBobeck. :^) >> >The charcoal cannister from 1970-on, was part of an "fuel evaporative-loss" >system, in which (I believe) fumes from the fuel tank would run through it, >and the filtered air from the cannister, etc... yup. my fuel tank was replaced somewhere along the line with one that didn't have a hole for the hose to the canister, so I took it upon myself to "can" the canister. actually its in my basement if anybody wants it. Name your price. Could be a museum piece... and btw, yes you do need a flame trap if you live near me...but some of my neighbors are worse, its amazing what I've seen them do with a blow torch... later dave - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 15 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981202 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: NADdMD@aol.com Date: Tue, 1 Dec 1998 11:41:48 EST Subject: PCV: I'll do it my way... After doing a bit of research into all this PCV stuff, and being the cheap b@st@rd I am, I'm going to swap over the old filler tube and valve cover cap and run it that way until I can find the missing bits at a bargain price. Newer vehicles with computer controlled emissions will barf at doing this and give all sorts of error codes, but as luck would have it, LR's are blissfully free of these sh!tty little computers. Nate - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 16 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981202 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: dbobeck@ushmm.org Date: Tue, 01 Dec 98 11:48:41 -0500 Subject: Re: Emission plumbing >There is an additional aluminium "spacer" about 3/8 or 1/2" thick at the >base of the carb and I don't mean that bakelite piece that separates the >carb and the manifold. The PCV valve is tapped into this piece. Hey! I knew that! That's why I was inquiring about an extra hole in the manifold. I thought they all went into the carb base. >Exactly...which is why you have to go to the carb base so the funkus can >be distributed evenly to all four cylinders. knew that too... > As I recall a few months (years?) back, someone was having carb icing >problems and the proper PCV valve/cover breather plumbing fixed it.... but not that. I thikn whoever it was that had the PCV plumbing i was inquiring about has stated that there have bben no problems. Oh well, so much for theory. The facts speak. I'm still sticking to the standard set up though. btw, ajr, you said you had carb icing problems due to the valve cover breather being routed to the intake elbow? which "nipple" was it attached to and how was the PCV valve set up? just wunnerin later dave - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 17 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981202 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Russell G. Dushin" <rgdushin@blackcat.cat.syr.edu> Date: Tue, 1 Dec 1998 11:56:36 -0500 (EST) Subject: Stainless Window Channel Neil wrote: *** marina and ask to see their parts catalogues for boat hardware. I paid $2.20 a foot after haggling a bit. Very thin metal walls that look more like chrome, but nice nylon strip for the bottom runner and durable-looking nylon fuzz on the sidewalls. *** um, again folks for those that didn't flinch the first time...one supplier *who sponsors this list* sells the stuff for $9.95 for a two meter length. One two meter strip does a single door top with about six inches to spare. And a hint from someone who just did this job...drill your holes bigger than you think you need to (make 'em just smaller than the head of your new screws) so the screw sits down within the channel and doesn't rub up against the window glass. rd/nige - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 18 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981202 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Alan_Richer@motorcity2.lotus.com Date: Tue, 1 Dec 1998 11:59:48 -0500 Subject: Re: Emission plumbing Dave yammers: btw, ajr, you said you had carb icing problems due to the valve cover breather being routed to the intake elbow? which "nipple" was it attached to and how was the PCV valve set up? just wunnerin later dave OK, the valve cover breather went to the carb intake elbow tube that sits dead-center of the intake. The tube it was connected to was the one that you see if you look into the carburettor end of the carb. elbow. That was a direct hose connection. The bottom of the PCV was connected through a righ-angle tube directly into the carb. adapter base for my Weber - the other end of the PCV connected to the steel tube that ran down to the base of the oil-filler line. That was it. ajr - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 19 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981202 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Faure, Marin" <Marin.Faure@PSS.Boeing.com> Date: Tue, 1 Dec 1998 09:25:41 -0800 Subject: Re: Charcoal Cannister From: "Stude, Herman L." <HermanS@krts.com> Date: Mon, 30 Nov 1998 11:47:09 -0600 Subject: Charcoal Cannister >I'm new to all this emmissions plumbing stuff, on my SIII 88 petrol I've got this little canister that looks like it has some sort of vent hose attached. In theory what does it do and what is the correct plumbing, and what happens if I yank it? It does not appear in my official LR manuals. The canister you refer to is a charcoal filter. The US-spec Series III had a sort of cobbled together emissions control system to meet the US emissions requirements that were in force in the early 1970s. Part of these requirements called for no fuel tank vapors escaping into the atmosphere. As a result, the original US-spec Series III fuel tanks were fitted with a breather tube that ran forward to the engine compartment and to the charcoal canister. The vehicle was also fitted with a special fuel filler cap which does not allow any air in, or vapors out, of the filler neck. The tank has to "breathe" of course, otherwise the partial vacuum resulting from the dropping fuel level will overpower the fuel pump's ability to pull fuel from the tank and the engine will stop. But if air can come into the tank, vapors can get out. Hence the charcoal filter. When the tank needed air, it was pulled in through the filter. When fuel vapors went the other direction, they were "scrubbed" by the charcoal, which somehow reduced whatever evil element was in the vapor to a level acceptable to the government. You were supposed to replace the charcoal canister every so often to maintain its effectiveness. Vehicles still use this system today: I believe my 1991 Range Rover has pretty much the same setup on it. Can you remove the charcoal filter? Yes. What happens? Nothing, unless someone with the proper instrumentation measures the amount of fuel vapors emanating from your vehicle. But don't plug the breather tube to the tank, or your engine will stop at inopportune moments. The "normal" Series III fuel tank doesn't have the breather tube connection on it because the tank is vented via a hole in the filler cap or the filler neck or in some other way I don't know about. In any event, when I replaced my original emissions fuel tank with a normal tank in the mid-1980s, I pulled the now useless breather tube and charcoal canister out of the vehicle. The tank still needed to be vented, however, so I simply removed the rubber sealing gasket from the original fuel cap. The cap fit is loose enough now to let air into the tank when it's needed, but tight enough to prevent any noticeable degree of fuel evaporation. If you are still running the original tank, I suggest you might want to retain the charcoal filter, not because it's really doing anything, but simply because it will help prevent dust, dirt, and bugs from making their way down the breather tube into the fuel tank. If you do not have the original emissions tank, and the filter and breather tube are not connected anymore, by all means pull them out. They just get in the way. __________________ C. Marin Faure faurecm@halcyon.com marin.faure@boeing.com (original owner) 1973 Land Rover Series III-88 1991 Range Rover Vogue SE - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 20 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981202 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: dbobeck@ushmm.org Date: Tue, 01 Dec 98 12:32:01 -0500 Subject: Re[2]: Emission plumbing al yammers back: >OK, the valve cover breather went to the carb intake elbow tube that sits >dead-center of the intake. The tube it was connected to was the one that you >see if you look into the carburettor end of the carb. elbow. so this is the one that goes into the elbow at an angle? - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 21 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981202 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Alan_Richer@motorcity2.lotus.com Date: Tue, 1 Dec 1998 12:33:03 -0500 Subject: Re: Re[2]: Emission plumbing Dave asks once more re: breather setup: >so this is the one that goes into the elbow at an angle? Yes - I set it up exactly as the Series III (which is what that motor came from). Mike L. Faxed me the routing of the hoses, and I copied them exactly. ajr - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 22 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981202 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: dbobeck@ushmm.org Date: Tue, 01 Dec 98 12:39:42 -0500 Subject: Re[2]: Charcoal Cannister > I simply removed the rubber sealing gasket from the original fuel cap. The >cap fit is loose enough now to let air into the tank when it's needed, but >tight enough to prevent any noticeable degree of fuel evaporation. read of a fire that started from a gas leak due to a bad gasket here (vehicle went on its side). I simply drilled a pinhole (just in the inside, not all the way through) here to solve the same problem. I guess my pinhole could leak too. original caps had a little breather thingy with a screen in it. Can they leak as well? I wold imagine if the hole is small enuogh they might not. later dave - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 23 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981202 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Faure, Marin" <Marin.Faure@PSS.Boeing.com> Date: Tue, 1 Dec 1998 09:48:18 -0800 Subject: Re: Rewiring for Halogen conversion. From: TeriAnn Wakeman <twakeman@cruzers.com> Date: Mon, 30 Nov 98 14:17:53 -0800 Subject: Re: Rewiring for Halogen conversion. >>I have been advised that if I am going to convert to halogen lights >then the wiring for the lights needs a rethink 'cos it's a real >mess. >Converting to halogen bulbs with the same wattage does NOT require ANY wiring changes. For instance, if your old lamps have a 40 watt low beam and a 55 watt high beam and the halogen lamps have the same rating then the same amount of current is running through the lamps old or new system. This is obviously correct. One word of caution, however. There is a temptation with halogen headlights to run much brighter bulbs. Instead of the standard 55/65 bulbs, for instance, I've talked to people who wanted to run 80/100 bulbs or whatever. Don't do it, regardess of how beefy your headlight wiring happens to be. I tried it on my Range Rover for a few weeks and found out why it's a bad idea. The light output is fabulous, of course, but the problem is heat. The high-output bulbs are intended to be run in lights that are mounted outside the vehicle: on a brush bar, light bar, roof rack, etc. In this position, there is a good flow of cooling air around the housing. Most headlights, and certainly the ones in Land Rovers and Range Rovers, are recessed into the body where there is virtually no cooling air flowing around the housings. You would not believe how hot the lenses get even on the "low" filaments. When I installed these bulbs in my Range Rover, I could not touch the lenses with my hand they were so hot, even on low beam. Fortunately, it never rained during the time I had the high-output bulbs in the vehicle: I don't know what the results would have been of cold rain hitting those incredibly hot lenses. In any event, the low beam filaments fried themselves as a result of the excess heat within a week or so, probably saving my wiring and relays, and I went back to the 55/65 bulbs, which still put out a much better and brighter light pattern that the factory-original sealed beam headlights. But the heat difference is dramatic: with 55/65 bulbs I can put my hand flat on the lenses and keep it there, even with the high beam filaments on. So be careful when you start messing around with trying to get more light output from your headlights, and think about the heat as well as the wiring. __________________ C. Marin Faure faurecm@halcyon.com marin.faure@boeing.com (original owner) 1973 Land Rover Series III-88 1991 Range Rover Vogue SE - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 24 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981202 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Steve Rochna" <rover@mail.oasisol.com> Date: Tue, 1 Dec 98 09:28:43 PDT Subject: Nevada Trophy Does anyone know any details about this years Nevada Trophy? I thought it was this coming weekend but cannot find any info. Thanks - Steve - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 25 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981202 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: dbobeck@ushmm.org Date: Tue, 01 Dec 98 13:23:21 -0500 Subject: Re[4]: Emission plumbing >so this is the one that goes into the elbow at an angle? >Yes - I set it up exactly as the Series III (which is what that motor came >from). Mike L. Faxed me the routing of the hoses, and I copied them >exactly. I think the diagram is confusing, I vaguely remember somethin glike that. Valve cover *should* go to the right angle nip though. Also the SIII manuall only shows the oz version which i tihkn may be slihghty different. I'll have to look at mine tonight. Not that it realy matters anymore... - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 26 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981202 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Lodelane@aol.com Date: Tue, 1 Dec 1998 14:02:00 EST Subject: Re: PCV: I'll do it my way... Nate, I've got the charcoal cannister, cannister support bracket, misc. hoses including the flame trap, a PCV assembly, and the triangular can that goes in the wheel well. All came off a salvaged vehicle. Interested? Larry Smith Chester, VA - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 27 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981202 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: asfco <asfco@banet.net> Date: Tue, 01 Dec 1998 14:34:13 -0500 Subject: Re: Stainless Window Channel Russell G. Dushin wrote: > And a hint from someone who just did this job...drill your holes > bigger than you think you need to (make 'em just smaller than the > head of your new screws) so the screw sits down within the channel > and doesn't rub up against the window glass. Russ; Why didn't you use a strong adhesive then there would be no worries about those blasted screws. Thats what I did on my series lll, it worked great Rgds Steve Bradke 68 lla > rd/nige > bigger than you think you need to (make 'em just smaller than the > head of your new screws) so the screw sits down within the channel > and doesn't rub up against the window glass. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 28 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981202 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: kevin.murphy@ps.ge.com Date: Tue, 1 Dec 1998 14:44:05 -0500 Subject: RE: Nevada Trophy Steve - I found this on the LRX Message Board. - Kevin ____________________ Posted by wcbr@thegrid.net ORE/LROA on November 27, 1998 at 01:40:40 Well, it's almost time for the NEVADA TROPHY 98. Last week we finished the course and tonight I finished the route books. So why aren't YOU entered? 20 Land Rovers will compete.... A few entrant hopefuls are STILL searching for a Navigator... Interested? Call 925-606-8301. Day-1: 12 hours of waypoint searching on & off-road. Day-2: Special Tasks ala Camel Trophy (of sorts), followed by another 12 hours of waypoint searching. In addition we've included some special tasks hidden @ waypoints! High score wins. All vehicles are teamed up into pairs for safety reasons.... Required: A LR, gps, compass, map and some safety items. Call 925-606-8301 to enter.... or volunteer , watch up close. See YOU in Nevada. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 29 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981202 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Wolfe, Charles" <CWolfe@smdc.org> Date: Tue, 1 Dec 1998 09:30:25 -0600 Subject: RE: Hub Castleated Nut - Oops!? I would take a look at your axles as well. I would think that tightening them to 100 ft/lbs might have put a strain the the axle and caused some twisting. cwolfe - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 30 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981202 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Peter Hope" <phope@hawaii.rr.com> Date: Tue, 1 Dec 1998 10:50:30 -1000 Subject: Re: Stainless Window Channel >Russ; >Why didn't you use a strong adhesive then there would be no worries >about those blasted screws. >Thats what I did on my series lll, it worked great >Rgds >Steve Bradke 68 lla Just curious, what type of adhesive did you use? Pete - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 31 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981202 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: asfco <asfco@banet.net> Date: Tue, 01 Dec 1998 16:31:41 -0500 Subject: Re: Stainless Window Channel Peter Hope wrote: > >Russ; > >Why didn't you use a strong adhesive then there would be no worries > [ truncated by lro-lite (was 6 lines)] > >Rgds > Just curious, what type of adhesive did you use? > Pete Pete; I beleive it was good 'ol sub-flooring adhesive PL 2000 the tracks will be easily removed /replaced next time..at least easier than getting out those $%#@!! screws Rgds Steve Bradke 68 lla - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 32 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981202 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Russell G. Dushin" <rgdushin@blackcat.cat.syr.edu> Date: Tue, 1 Dec 1998 16:33:00 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: Stainless Window Tracking Steve asks: *** Russ; Why didn't you use a strong adhesive then there would be no worries about those blasted screws. Thats what I did on my series lll, it worked great *** Uh, two reasons, I suppose: 1) The sliding window is held in by the window tracking...adhesive let's go and in your lap it comes. 2) How easily will it come apart next time? (ie if you resolve problem #1 you're now faced with #2) and then there's the potentially lame reason that screwed in tracking is stockesque. r"whatever works for you"d/nige - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 33 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981202 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Frank Elson" <frankelson@felson.freeserve.co.uk> Date: Tue, 1 Dec 1998 21:55:59 -0000 Subject: Re: block heaters not a bad idea, a genny, but again, do you have battery Powerpacks in the States? You charge them in the same fashion as a car battery then shove them in the back of the motor for when you need power. They have 12 volt, 110 volt and 240 volt (our domestic system is 240) on demand. You could use it at night, pull it out of the truck and stick it on charge in the house then put it in that night when you get home. Then again, why not just pull a lead from the nearest street lamp. Oh yes, very funny, but a guy was just nicked in Manchester for running his whole house from a nearby street lamp!! Best Cheers Frank +--+--+--+ I !__| [_]|_\___ I ____|"_|"__|_ | / B791 PKV "(o)======(o)" Bronze Green 110 CSW - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 34 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981202 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Frank Elson" <frankelson@felson.freeserve.co.uk> Date: Tue, 1 Dec 1998 21:58:18 -0000 Subject: Re: Seetbeltz and seetz re: yr seetz, what is the cost of a pair of 110/Ninety seats in Ca? They fit in the series motors. Best Cheers Frank +--+--+--+ I !__| [_]|_\___ I ____|"_|"__|_ | / B791 PKV "(o)======(o)" Bronze Green 110 CSW - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 35 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981202 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Frank Elson" <frankelson@felson.freeserve.co.uk> Date: Tue, 1 Dec 1998 22:04:06 -0000 Subject: Re: Burbank Ca. Russ, not fed up with the snow already ? hey, sorry about the letters to the kids, life got a bit fraught and by the time I had it together again I thought they might have forgotten - the mindspan of children being what it is. Can still do it, tho, if you think it would be nice for them... or how about Christmas Cards?? (one each) Best Cheers Frank +--+--+--+ I !__| [_]|_\___ I ____|"_|"__|_ | / B791 PKV "(o)======(o)" Bronze Green 110 CSW - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 36 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981202 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Wolfe, Charles" <CWolfe@smdc.org> Date: Tue, 1 Dec 1998 17:05:17 -0600 Subject: Ethics 101 I recently sold my 1995 GMC Sierra 4x4 club cab with 90K miles and the 350 engine. I sold it for 11K, wich is about 4K under book. I reduced price because it was mechanically perfec(I thought), had pristine interior but had a lot of minor ext cosmetic stuff (scratches in gel coat, small ding etc as result of being working dog truck) I honestly knew of nothing wrong with the mechanics of the truck. I had all maintainence and repairs done at the local GMC shop. I refered the buyer to this shop for all maintainence records and for their opinion of the truck. The buyer seems like a very nice man. We all seemed happy at the end of the deal. One week after the sale, he calls me to tell me that thew truck had problems shifting (5 speed manual) and he took it took a local garage (not GMC) and they told him that the main shaft of the transmission was worn where the pilot bearing rides on it. They told him that the transmission had to be replaced so he went ahead and had them do it for 1300.00. Then he called me and told me about it. I feel awful. The buyer seems like a nice fellow and I do not want to shaft him (pun intended) however, I had no problems with the truck when I sold it and I honestly knew of no mechanical problems with the truck. What should I do? Should I help to pay some of the replacements costs or what? I want to do the right thing but I really do not have any extra cash and I thought that I sold the truck at a good deal. What is the right thing to do? I sure wish he had called me before the repair was done. Cwolfe ---- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 37 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981202 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: John Cranfield <john.cranfield@ns.sympatico.ca> Date: Tue, 01 Dec 1998 20:00:14 -0400 Subject: Re: Ethics 101 "Wolfe, Charles" wrote: > I recently sold my 1995 GMC Sierra 4x4 club cab with 90K miles and the 350 > engine. I sold it for 11K, wich is about 4K under book. I reduced price > because it was mechanically perfec(I thought), had pristine interior but had > a lot of minor ext cosmetic stuff (scratches in gel coat, small ding etc as > result of being working dog truck) > I honestly knew of nothing wrong with the mechanics of the truck. I had all > maintainence and repairs done at the local GMC shop. I refered the buyer to [ truncated by list-digester (was 33 lines)] > do? I sure wish he had called me before the repair was done. > Cwolfe Two things Charles. Did you mention anything about any sort of warrenty even casually? . Was the sale on an " as is where is basis"? The way I look at is, that by okaying the repair the new owner has accepted full reponsibility. He didn't give you chance to refund the money and take the truck back. He also didn't give you a chance to verify that the repair was really needed. Tell him you do thing is is unfortunate that he bad luck so soon after getting the truck and wish him well for the future. John and Muddy - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 38 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981202 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: jimfoo@uswest.net Date: Tue, 01 Dec 1998 16:56:28 -0800 Subject: spiders Other than the splines, is there any size difference between regular rover, and salsbury spider gears? Jim Hall - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 39 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981202 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Wise Owl Innovation Incorporated" <wiseowl@direct.ca> Date: Tue, 1 Dec 1998 16:15:12 -0800 Subject: Re: horn buttton Jim sorry to see WOI not listed as one of your usual suspects but we can sell you a good used Series II horn button assembly for $20 plus $5.00 post and pack. call us at 1-888-880-2600 if you still need it ---------- > From: James Wolf <J.Wolf@worldnet.att.net> > To: lro@playground.sun.com > Subject: horn buttton > Date: Saturday, November 28, 1998 10:09 AM > This is a call for the SIIA horn button (plastic about 2" in dia.). I don't > need the whole steering wheel, I have finally gotton hold of a SII wire > wheel in good shape. The only part not fixable is this horn button, I would - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 40 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981202 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Peter Hope" <phope@hawaii.rr.com> Date: Tue, 1 Dec 1998 15:42:00 -1000 Subject: Re: Ethics 101 I agree with what Joh C. said. If he wanted you to help pay for it he should have talked to you before ok'ing the repair. Just to cover your self you should find out if your state has any sort of lemon law. Some states do and unless the sales receipt states "as is" the seller may be responsible for any problems with the vehicle 30-90 days after the sale. Pete - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 41 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981202 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: DNDANGER@aol.com Date: Tue, 1 Dec 1998 21:16:51 EST Subject: Re: Happy Holiday freom over the watere.. In a message dated 98-11-27 18:42:08 EST, you write: << Hi guys, happy holiday and, I though you might like to learn more about your = history from the point of view of some English schoolchildren. I feel I have to add that these are not necessarily the brainiest in the = country....... >> It is with some dismay that I submit that these children have at least as good an understanding of our history as many of our own "not necessarily brainy" offspring. It appears that the state of education in the english speaking world is suffering a grave malady. We can only hope that future generations will find the strength to reverse the trend. As for our generation we are much to worried about who will support our lazy asses when we retire, hopefully soon. Bill (bemused, bothered and bewildered) Lawrence Albq, NM - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 42 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981202 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: William Leacock <wleacock@pipeline.com> Date: Tue, 01 Dec 1998 21:50:46 -0500 Subject: John Hong John, are you on holiday again ? or are you still recieving mail ? if so on what address, my private mails have been returned. Bill Leacock ( Limey in exile ) NY USA. 88 and 109 LR's and 89 RR - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 43 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981202 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: William Leacock <wleacock@pipeline.com> Date: Tue, 01 Dec 1998 22:02:05 -0500 Subject: Heater identification My 59 88 has a heater that is approx 6 inch square in cross section and perhaps a foot long, it is fed with air from a fan assembly fitted under the hood. The air passes through a steel duct from the passengers side, the duct is perhaps 2 inch by 3 inch. What type of heater is this ? Bill Leacock ( Limey in exile ) NY USA. 88 and 109 LR's and 89 RR - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 45 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981202 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Jeremy Bartlett <bartlett@slip.net> Date: Tue, 01 Dec 1998 20:00:06 -0800 Subject: Re: Ethics 101 Wolfe, Charles wrote: > I honestly knew of nothing wrong with the mechanics of the truck. > What should I do? Nothing. It's just plain unfortunate hard luck that comes with buying used vehicles.The other party already got a good price. You didn't offer a warranty and they bought it as is. It's too bad but it's not anything to fret about. Jeremy - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 46 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981202 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: DNDANGER@aol.com Date: Tue, 1 Dec 1998 22:28:28 EST Subject: Re: SOV's In a message dated 98-11-29 00:51:00 EST, you write: But sometimes there is something good to say about a real small light weight 4x like our Rovers (content haha). It's been a while but I think the old M151's had a total weight of only 1500lbs. Pete >> Having spent a goodly amount of time under them at one point in my life I seem to recall that about 200 pounds of that was grease zerks. Bill Lawrence Albq, NM - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 47 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981202 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: DNDANGER@aol.com Date: Tue, 1 Dec 1998 23:21:18 EST Subject: Re: Non-charging solved In a message dated 98-11-30 11:08:09 EST, you write: << LR owners should be more self sufficient than this >> HEAR HEAR!!!!! (and they should be able to spell "wrong") Bill Lawrence Albq, NM - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 48 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981202 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: DNDANGER@aol.com Date: Tue, 1 Dec 1998 22:37:57 EST Subject: Re: Hesitating Rover In a message dated 98-11-29 09:59:17 EST, you write: << Can anyone who is familiar with the Stromberg 175 CD2S carburettor please tell me if the air-valve diaphragm is leaking, I would get a hesitation during acceleration i.e. a "flat-spot". BTW, I have top-up the dashboard oil and ensure that the piston is not sticking but to no avail. >> The diaphragms and pistons in the Strombergs are analogous to the pistons in SU carburetors. If the diaphragm is broken the action of the piston will not be correct and hesitation on acceleration might be one of the symptoms. fortunately they are cheap, availablr and easy to replace. Bill Lawrence Albq, NM - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 49 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981202 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: David Cockey <dcockey@tir.com> Date: Tue, 01 Dec 1998 23:53:39 -0500 Subject: Re: Heater identification William Leacock wrote: > My 59 88 has a heater that is approx 6 inch square in cross section > and > perhaps a foot long, it is fed with air from a fan assembly fitted > under the > hood. The air passes through a steel duct from the passengers side, > the > duct is perhaps 2 inch by 3 inch. What type of heater is this ? It sounds like a common SII heater which has installed on this side of the Atlantic. It was either the predecessor to the Kodiak heaters, or the Mark I version of the Kodiak; can anyone clarify Kodiak heater terminology? Do you have a screened oppening in the side of the right front fender next to the radiator panel? If so, that was the air intake for the heater and a cloth/spiral wire air hose (4" dia or so) ran inside the fender to the heater unit. Our '60 SII SW has one of these heaters, and has distinct evidence of originally been fitted with a Smith's round heater at the factory. I've seen them is several other SII's also. A somewhatsimilar configuration heater is shown in the early SII/SIIA optional equipment book. It however has a metal rectangular air duct inside the front fender, and a different arrangement inside the cab. The only one of these I heard of was in a SII Steve Stoneham had. Regards, David Cockey - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 51 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981202 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Clinton Coates <ccoates@GOLDER.com> Date: Tue, 1 Dec 1998 17:09:00 -0800 Subject: RE: Block heaters and seetz not a bad idea, a genny, but again, do you have battery Powerpacks in the States? Yup. And we gotzem in Canada too. You charge them in the same fashion as a car battery then shove them in the back of the motor for when you need power. They have 12 volt, 110 volt and 240 volt (our domestic system is 240) on demand. You could use it at night, pull it out of the truck and stick it on charge in the house then put it in that night when you get home. I confess I hadn't thought about that. They are cheap and compact, which is good. I have a few concerns though: 1) how much power will one push out after soaking in -20 o4 -30 c for a few hours (I could just bring it into work with me, I gues....) 2) how many deep discharge cycles will one of these stand? 3) how long will one supply a fairly current heavy blockheater? If one would run for 45 minutes to 1 hour, it would be easy to have it set up with a timer to shut off after 1/2 hour or so. It doesn't alwyas take that much of a 'hit' to help the old engine go. Then again, why not just pull a lead from the nearest street lamp. Oh yes, very funny, but a guy was just nicked in Manchester for running his whole house from a nearby street lamp!! Errr.. no street lamps where I often work.... Re: Seetz. If I could get ahold of a set of defender high back seats for cheap, I would jump at the chance. However, aftermarket ones from Trakkars/Bat Fastards are pretty expensive once they get over to this side of the pond, what with the exchange, shipping etc. I would *love* to get my hands on a set of high back early 90/110 seats for about 50 pounds or so.... Clinton - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 52 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981202 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Rovergo@aol.com Date: Wed, 2 Dec 1998 00:54:33 EST Subject: Re: burbank ca. there are plenty of rover people in so. cal. heck im one and just 40 min from burbank in the desert if you make the move bring your rover i will be glad to show you some good offroading and at least 10 other series owners close to burbank. Pat young 65 2a 88". - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 53 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981202 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: DNDANGER@aol.com Date: Wed, 2 Dec 1998 01:05:51 EST Subject: Re: block heaters In a message dated 98-12-01 02:23:09 EST, you write: Now, why couldn't one mount a locked ammo box on the front fender a la SAS desert patrol vehicle, insulate it and put one of the wee small 2 stroke generators in there? They are pretty quiet (and would be quiter inside an insulated box) and could run the block heater and a remote interior heater. Heck, I could even route the exhaust into the engine bay to toast things up a bit.... The only trick is to make sure that it would be able to take the load drawn by the various heaters. I figure 1/2 hour warm up would be sufficient. Hey. Some of them even have a 12V plug. Now I bet it wouldn't take much to get one to act as a 12V genny as well if the battery flattens or the alternator goes to pot in the backwoods... Clinton >> And you can do that for less than $700? Bill lawrence Albq, NM - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 54 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981202 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: DNDANGER@aol.com Date: Wed, 2 Dec 1998 00:42:14 EST Subject: Re: CB Master Cylinder 88 vs 109. In a message dated 98-11-30 23:29:21 EST, you write: I am going to rebuild my 109 CB master Cylinder this week. I have several spare CB brake pedal/master cylinder assemblies in my barn. It would be neato to be able to rebuild one of those and then still drive my rover and just do the old switcheroo. Is there any easy way to tell is the CB Master Cylinder is for a 109 or an 88? Cwolfe >> The 88 master cylinder has a 7/8" bore while the 109 used a 1" bore. Most cylinders will have some indication of bore size on the outside of the cylinder. Bill Lawrence Albq, NM - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 55 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981202 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Lawrence Lee <lawrencelee_tc@yahoo.com> Date: Wed, 2 Dec 1998 02:19:15 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: Hesitating Rover To all that replied to my request on info about a holed diaphragm, thanks. Popped the top off the Stromberg, but diaphragm is intact, needle's fine, etc. Enriched the fuel mix and it drives like a champ. However, it's not gonna pass the emissions test - 7% CO - in order to drive smoothly. Think I'll just drive it like that, thn lean it down just before entering the inspection centre ;-) and hope I don't get stopped for a spotcheck on the road. == Lawrence Lee Blk 22, Sin Ming Road, # 11-216 Singapore 570022 Tel: (65) 456 7815 Mobile: 9 684 3678 Land Rover SerIII 109, 2.6l "Kerbau" A Malay name for Water Buffalo. One that PREFERS to stay in mud. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 56 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981202 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
END OF * LIST DIGEST Input: messages 55 lines 2935 [forwarded 162 whitespace 0] Output: lines 1736 [content 1469 forwarded 137 (cut 25) whitespace 0][ First Message | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981202 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Digest Messages Copyright 1990-1999 by the original poster or/and Empire Rover Owners Society, All rights reserved. Photos & text Copyright 1990-1999 Bill Caloccia, All rights reserved. Empire/LRO List of charges for Empire/LRO Policies
against the distribution of unsolicited commercial e-mail (aka SPAM).
|
![]() |
|||
<--Back |
HOME |
TOP |
Forward --> |
|