[ First Message Last | Table of Contents | <- Digest -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "David M. Schwarz" <dschwarz@pipeline.com> Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1998 09:29:19 -0500 Subject: BMW X5 Today's N.Y.Times ran a picture of BMW's announced intended competition to Lexus, Lincoln, Cadillac and Mercedes' off road vehicle. to be first sold in the U.S. in the year 2000 and to be built at BMW's Spartanberg, South Carolina plant. Why not a version of the Range Rover? - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 2 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981123 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: John Cranfield <john.cranfield@ns.sympatico.ca> Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1998 11:02:46 -0400 Subject: Re: Coolant Flow & Heat "Peter M. Kaskan" wrote: > Hi All - > I bought a second heater, one to put where the Smiths is put. The > one I've got now, I'll put in the back. > So, will there be enough coolant flow for these? I don't want to > burn out the pump (which BTW, was rebuilt in the spring). > Which direction does the coolant flow, out of the front or the back > of the head? [ truncated by list-digester (was 20 lines)] > Cheers - Peter > (trying to stay warm up here in Ithaca You will have enough flow and heat for both heaters but remember to route the flow through both heaters in series do not try to tee into the existing hoses. The water will always travel the route of least resistance which will mean there will very little to the rear heater if not in series. If you mount the rear heater higher than the regular it is advisable to make provision for bleeding air out at the highest point so that you can get the full amount of coolant into the system. You will have to do this with the engine running, topping up the coolant as needed. John and Muddy - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 3 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981123 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: lndrvr@ldd.net (BRIAN WILLOUGHBY) Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1998 09:47:35 -0600 Subject: Bullet Connector Crimping Tool Does anyone out there know of bullet connector crimping pliers that are available in the U.S.? The regular old Stanley crimping pliers I have flatten out the connector whereas factory crimped ones maintain their roundness. I live in the middle of nowhere so something available from Sears or Western Auto would fit the bill best. Thanks in advance, Brian Willoughby 1960 Land-Rover Series II 88" S.W. "The Lady Eleanor" - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 4 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981123 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Vel Natarajan" <vel@enteract.com> Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1998 10:08:05 -0600 Subject: Re: BMW X5 From: David M. Schwarz <dschwarz@pipeline.com> >Today's N.Y.Times ran a picture of BMW's announced intended competition to >Lexus, Lincoln, Cadillac and Mercedes' off road vehicle. >to be first sold in the U.S. in the year 2000 and to be built at BMW's >Spartanberg, South Carolina plant. >Why not a version of the Range Rover? According to this past weeks Autoweek magazine which I have in front of me... "Rover, in fact, will use the X5's platform as the basis for its next Range Rover, due in late 2001." It should range between $41,600 - $54,700. The first 2 gas engines offered will both be V8's: a 235hp 3.5liter and the 540's 286hp 4.4liter. Later, X5 will get MBW's new 3.0 I-6, (230hp) which will replace the 2.8 6cyl in BMWs current lineup. 2 common-rail diesel engines will likely go to Europe. (184hp I-6),and a 4.0 V8 which will have 368lb-ft of torque available at 1800rpm. They will eventually come out with an X5 M, powered by the new M5's 400hp 5.0L V8. All wil get ZF-sourced 5-speed automatics sending power to the electronically controlled full-time 4wd system with a variable torque-split center diff. It also has the air-suspension developed in conjunction with LR. It's not an SUV but an "SAV - Sports Activity Vehicle". Um yeah, whatever... - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 5 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981123 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: TeriAnn Wakeman <twakeman@cruzers.com> Date: Sun, 22 Nov 98 08:11:21 -0800 Subject: Re: Bullet Connector Crimping Tool >Does anyone out there know of bullet connector crimping pliers that are >available in the U.S.? The regular old Stanley crimping pliers I have ;>flatten out the connector whereas factory crimped ones maintain their ;>roundness. I live in the middle of nowhere so something available from ;>Sears or Western Auto would fit the bill best. Thanks in advance, Humm... I have only seen soldered on bullet connectors in genuine factory wiring harnesses. Mind you I have only had four British cars in my life (1969 88, 1960 109, 1961 TR3A, 1968 MGBGT) I installed a new wiring harness in the TR3A a couple of years ago and it had crimped bullet connectors. I replaced the headlamp sub harnesses on the 109 last year and the new ones had crimp on bullet connectors. It appears that the companies making new replacement harnesses are crimping on the bullet connectors but it appears to me that the original factory harnesses, at least during the sixties, had soldered on bullet connectors. When I rewired my 109 last year I soldered on all the bullet connectors. Except for the headlamp sub harnesses, I built my entire harness from a pile of bullet connectors and lengths of colourful striped wires. TeriAnn Wakeman The Green Rover, rebuilt and Santa Cruz, California and maintained using parts from twakeman@cruzers.com British Pacific 800-554-4133 http://www.cruzers.com/~twakeman Walk in harmony with the earth and all her creatures and you will create beauty wherever you go. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 6 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981123 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Thomas Spoto <tspoto@az.com> Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1998 08:09:18 -0800 Subject: Re: Half-shaft blues I had a stuck shaft once. It was due to the previous owner placing a 1/8" steel plate between the differential and the axle housing. There was no gasket just lots of orange silicone sealant. Only reason I could find for this to have been done was to keep the ring gear from contacting the front of the axle housing as it had been dented in. Why they didn't hammer out the dent, I'll never know. With the 1/8" offset the axles didn't like to turn easily, engage the hubs and you got this weird vibration as the axles twisted. How they got the axles into the diff splines is another mystery. I replaced the axle housing to be safe. Tom Spoto Todd Ondick wrote: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 7 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981123 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Braman Wing" <bcw6@hotmail.com> Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1998 09:00:32 PST Subject: Re: Coolant flow and heaters > I bought a second heater, one to put where the Smiths is put. The >one I've got now, I'll put in the back. > So, will there be enough coolant flow for these? I don't want to >burn out the pump (which BTW, was rebuilt in the spring). I've run a second heater behind the seats for years. Ran teh hoses through the trans. tunnel and hooked it up in series with teh original. Never had any trouble. At low revs there is not enough flow to keep both heaters hot, but above 2000rpm or so it is no problem. You cannot "overload" or "burn out" the waterpump, it flow a certain amount of coolant dependent on rpm independent of load. All that will happen if the first heater is too big is the coolant will be cold by the time it gets to the second heater. > Which direction does the coolant flow, out of the front or the back >of the head? I believe it flows out the back, although I'll have to check next time I'm outside. > Do I need to keep the level of the heaters at or below the head >height? I want to mount the second heater on the roofside in back, which >would make it higher than the head. Therefore the pump would need to push >coolant above it's own height. Not sure about this. My second heater is right about head height, but below the coolant tank on the radiator. My feeling is that the water pump would have no trouble pumping the relatively small amount of coolant used by the heater that high, but you might run into unpleasantness when filling the system, i.e. you will have a huge air pocket in teh second heater as it is above the radiator header. Even if you then ran the engine to fill the pocket, next time you removed the rad cap it would all drain out. I'll have to think about this, but I'd advise you to keep the highest point of the heating system below the radiator header tank. > Might I get a cooling problem? I have the RN high temp thermo to >put in, and a radiator muff. High temp thermo and rad muff will probably help even more than the second heater. There should be no cooling problems, the only difference it will make is that it might take the engine a bit longer to warm up if you're running the heaters. > The heaters add to 35, 000 BTUs. I wonder how many BTUs past >engine operating temp, the 2.25 puts out? Anybody figure out the BTUs of a >2.25 petrol? Sounds like a problem I might have been able to figure 5 >years ago in PChem, but that was then, barely... Actually, this is a very complex problem for which you need thermo and hat transfer to get even a rough answer. The short version is that it is 100% meaningless to rate a heater in BTUs since a BTU is a unit of energy and a heater's output is based on power, or energy per time. A candle could put out 35000 BTUs if it burned long enough. Similarly, a nuclear bomb puts out 35000 BTUs in some minute fraction of a second. The rating would have to be in BTUs per some length of time to mean anything. Perhaps there is some convention for this that I don't know about. In addition, the output of a heater is also dependant on the rate of the coolant flow through it and teh temperature of the coolant. Again, perhaps there is some convention for this, such as 190 degrees at max. rpm. Unless they are taken at exactly the same temperature and flow, comparing heater outputs is useless and best left to the advertising people who make up these ratings. Sorry for teh diatribe, but these things annoy me. To answer your question, though, the engine probably has enough heat output at anything off idle to run 10 heaters. The limiting factor is the small amount of flow through the heating system. My experience tells me that with the Kodiak up front and a good size aftermarket heater in the back, the system will just about keep up at cruising speed. At idle I get cold air from the front heater. It would be in interesting project to re-plumb teh cooling system to add more heating capacity, but two heaters make the interior pretty damn toasty. Cheers, and if you want to look at my setup, let me know. Braman IIA 88" - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 8 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981123 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "d.h.lowe" <dhlowe@idirect.com> Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1998 00:13:24 -0500 Subject: Re: Coolant Flow & Heat Disagree John..........You can pipe them in parallel so that they both " see" the same entering water temperature provided you connect them in what is known as a reverse return configuration. I will try to describe it. Draw a horizontal line on the left hand side of a piece of paper, this is the flow direction. Continue the line to the right and show a tee connection to the first heater coil pointing down.Continue the horizontal line to the right and turn this down to the second coil ( show two boxes for the coils). From the bottom of the box that is the first coil show a connection which represents the return water leaving that coil and draw that line to the right passing by the second coil box and show a tee connection with the branch pointing up to the coil and with the horizontal line continuing past the box.Now draw this return line pulling a U turn and draw it straight back to the left hand side of the page were it now connects to the return to the engine. The logic in this configuration is that the first coil has the shortest supply connection and the longest return but the second coil has the longest supply connection but the shortest return and provides a measure of self balancing of the piping resistance.The tee connections balance themselves out. If your coil has a thick multi row coil with offset connections then make sure you connect them as follows.......Air on to the coil.....water off the coil ...........In other words the coldest air is "seeing" the coolest water. ....Air off the coil...water on the coil. If the coil has a tank at either end then it makes no difference. The engine flow is from the front to the back.Do NOT under any circumstances use anything other than the double acting skirted thermostat. Thats another story.Gotta go, Brett Storey just hurtled up the drive in his 88 with NO canvas top on. Has nobody told this nutter that winter has arrived in the great white north it must be about 28.F. out there. Boy that must have turned a few heads blasting down the 401 highway. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 9 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981123 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: John <john@roverstuff.com> Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1998 10:15:20 -0800 Subject: 101 FC email list info... Hi Folks, For you 101 Forward Control fans, point the browser at http://www.onelist.com/subscribe.cgi/101 and follow the directions. John - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 10 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981123 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Zaxcoinc@aol.com Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1998 13:33:08 EST Subject: Re: dumb question In a message dated 11/21/98 7:06:37 PM Pacific Standard Time, tondick@hotmail.com writes: << Fuel mixture adjustment for a Rochester carb... >> Any carburettor has seperate mixture adjustments for as many various circuits as it operates. The mixture for the Rochester (running, main jet) is varied by replacing the jet (orifice) in the bottom of the float bowl. Alternately, the jet can be reamed to a larger size or soldered closed and drilled to accomplish a smaller size. The jet size is measured in thousandths of an inch. The Idle circuit only comes into play in this carburetor when the throttle butterfly is closed almost completely. The orifice which meters gasoline for this circuit is a cone shaped needle which is driven into or away from a orifice by screw adjustment. Screwing the needle in whill close the orifice while screwing it out will enlarge the orifice. Screwing it in tightly will dent the cone and orifice, making adjustment inaccurate and problematic. Any other questions? Zack Arbios - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 11 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981123 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "The Becketts" <hillman@bigpond.com> Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1998 23:29:13 +1100 Subject: Smiths Oil Pressure gauge question Nate wrote: >With the standard Smiths oil pressure gauge, does one use the >10 volt voltage stabilizer to energize it? If so, can one run a third >line from the original one (fuel gauge and temp gauge) or is a >second stabilizer needed? Assuming you have an electric oil pressure gauge and not one with a capilliary tube, just run a wire from the origonal voltage stabiliser Ron - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 12 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981123 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "The Becketts" <hillman@bigpond.com> Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1998 23:32:11 +1100 Subject: spring bushings Hi Guys, I haven't been following the thread on spring bushings too closely as I own a coiler (one day I'll convince Elisabeth that we really need a Series). John Cranfield wrote: > If the pins and bush sleeves were intended to move there >would be provision for lubrication. But, I wonder... I've noticed that a number of manufacturers done here (Oz) sell greasable shackles for most 4WD (dunno about Landies). Are such things useful (or feasible) for Series Rovers? Ron - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 13 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981123 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Todd Schlemmer <nullman@ptinet.net> Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1998 00:47:39 -0800 Subject: Trivial solution - capillary drain If you carry a spare on the bonnet, you may have experienced the rusty swill that accumulates in the rim. The original spare on my truck was soooo rusty, I couldn't mount a new tire on it. A 15" length of cotton rope, placed so that 4-6 inches lie in the forwardmost (lowest) point of the rim, and lead to and through a lugnut hole and down to the bonnet, will drain a rim-full of rainwater in several hours (as soon as it stops raining or you park under cover). Capillary action will pull the water up the rope, wetting the entire length, and gravity will then siphon all the water out of the rim. I haven't experimented with any methodology to secure the rope - it seems to stay in place just fine. Some stout waterproof tape or strategic knots would serve to keep the rope from jumping about, I guess. YMMV - try different kinds of rope Todd 71 88" IIA "Fantod" Todd Schlemmer Vashon Is., WA - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 14 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981123 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Marc Rengers <mr@b4m.com> Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1998 21:57:02 +0100 Subject: Re: hotplugs >I've thought about replacing the hotplugs in my cylinder head (I have to >remove it to install new intake valvs, guides for all, and hotplugs - if >they're bad), but I've heard two horror stories too many! Maybe I'll replace >them ONLY if they're bad (they can cause the diesel to blow oil like crazy if >the pegs inside them are broken off - instant smoke screen!) >My diesel is blowing oil, and the pistons/rings/bores looked great last >time I [ truncated by list-digester (was 10 lines)] >had the head off (replaced the valve stem seals, which didn't do anything for >it), so off it comes again, for more new parts. Well, my engine is running fine after replacing the hotplugs..... still... ;-) Also replaced the valvestemseals, I don't think they should have been replaced, but I had some and the head was on my bench, so... Good Luck (if you're not already started or finished, or else good luck with driving with new hotspots) Marc Rengers Westeremden, Holland mr@b4m.com 0596-551334 (home) 050-3666761 (work) 06-51550521 (GSM) 06-59111461 (pager) http://www.minerva.fk.hanze.nl/landrover/index.html --_ --_ _____|__\___ ________|__\___ | _ | |_ |} | _ | |_ |} "(_)"""""(_)" ""(_)"""""""(_)" 1978 SIII 88" 2.25 diesel 1968 109" SIIa 2.25 petrol reg. 47-DB-13 reg. unknown marine blue green (15 layers of paint) also subscribed to LAND ROVER Owner International (great magazine) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 15 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981123 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: John Cranfield <john.cranfield@ns.sympatico.ca> Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1998 18:44:50 -0400 Subject: Re: Coolant Flow & Heat "d.h.lowe" wrote: > Disagree John..........You can pipe them in parallel so that they both " see" the > same entering water temperature provided you connect them in what is known as a > reverse return configuration. I will try to describe it. > Draw a horizontal line on the left hand side of a piece of paper, this is the flow > direction. Continue the line to the right and show a tee connection to the first > heater coil pointing down.Continue the horizontal line to the right and turn this > down to the second coil ( show two boxes for the coils). From the bottom of the box [ truncated by list-digester (was 27 lines)] > about 28.F. out there. Boy that must have turned a few heads blasting down the 401 > highway. What you say is of course accurate, but messy, soooo much simpler to run in series. So what is the story behind your insistance on the skirted thermostat. I haven't used one in years and would like to know what ungodly sins I might have committed in my innosence. John and Muddy - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 16 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981123 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: John Cranfield <john.cranfield@ns.sympatico.ca> Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1998 18:56:46 -0400 Subject: Re: BMW X5 Vel Natarajan wrote: > It's not an SUV but an "SAV - Sports Activity Vehicle". > Um yeah, whatever... Well you do have to wonder at the "utility" in SUV John and Muddy - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 17 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981123 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: hstin@cts.com (Henry Stinson) Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1998 15:12:36 -0800 (PST) Subject: Rochester Carb??? Hello, I pulled the top of my Rochester Carb today to replace the main seal that had been leaking. After replacing the seal I checked the float level as per the directions (1 and 9/32) and reassembled the unit. The 2.25 started fine but I noticed it was running a little rough. After adjusting the mixutre I went for a drive and found the car would lurch terribly under load and if I reved the motor it backfired after letting off the gas. I pulled the top off again this afternoon and checked the float level and there appeared to be no problem It's the first time I've played with the carb, is there something I am missing? The manual that came with a rebuild kit I have in my spares pack indicates there is nothing wrong with the way I've assembled the float setup? Any hints would be helpful.... Thanks. Henry Stinson '73 SWB SHED - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 18 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981123 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Lloyd Perrin <Lloyd_Perrin@jdedwards.com.au> Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1998 11:06:28 +1000 Subject: 96 Discovery - Instrument Cluster Lighting A small problem, but now it's become very frustrating. Task: To replace the switch globe on the (dash) Recirc button. Problem: How do you remove the globe from these buttons ? Black facing cap comes off easily enough. But I can't find an "easy" way to get to the globe. Any suggestions ? Cheers Lloyd Perrin - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 19 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981123 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Zaxcoinc@aol.com Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1998 20:00:53 EST Subject: Re: Rochester Carb??? In a message dated 11/22/98 3:14:03 PM Pacific Standard Time, hstin@cts.com writes: << It's the first time I've played with the carb, is there something I am missing? >> Take a look inside the float bowl for sme miniscule crap floating about. Can happen, and it's not too hard to look. Zack, gotta love the Rochester, Arbios - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 20 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981123 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: DHW4U@aol.com Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1998 20:06:03 EST Subject: Steering Relay Rebuild? Has anyone rebuilt the steering relay on a series IIa replacing the split washers and spring. One fellow talked about doing it in place. Dave Walls IIa 88 (offroad everyday) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 21 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981123 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: WORKMEISTR@aol.com Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1998 20:32:07 EST Subject: . subscribe lro - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 22 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981123 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Solihull@aol.com Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1998 20:32:39 EST Subject: what the goo does, was speed and stuff.... Neil sez:It is an ex-MOD vehicle and the underside is coated in a thick black goo, is this some form of protectant? i.e will I need to waxoyl it as well? Depends on where you got it. The goo might be there to hold the rust on. Hmmmmmm. Cheers!! John Dillingham near Canton, GA KF4NAS LROA #1095 SoLaRoS #23 73 s3 swb 25902676b DD "Pansy" 72 s3 swb 25900502a rusted, in suspended animation Looking for a P5 project, well, OK, or a P6 or another SD1 (770)345-3516 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 23 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981123 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Richard Clarke"<Richard.Clarke@nre.vic.gov.au> Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1998 08:06:54 +1000 Subject: Re: The Land Rover Owner Daily Digest My basic system is only a slight addition to yours . . . I put an air line between the front tyre valve and the cap so that I have a constant (almost) air reservoir of about 40psi Like you say - must keep an eye on the fluid level in the reservoir as it will blead out quite quickly if you're not careful From: Alan_Richer@motorcity2.lotus.com Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1998 12:11:24 -0500 Subject: Re: Vacuum brake bleeder (SnapON) Re: Pressurized system bleeder: Tell you what I did - cheap, simple and effective, though I can't take credit for the idea..... Take an old reservoir cap and drill a hole in the top to take a tubeless tyre valve. Slather the gap and lip on the tubeless tyre valve with sealer and set it into the hole in the aforementioned cap. Take your tyre valve tool and remove the valve from the center of the tyre valve. Now, when you need to bleed your braking system screw this cap onto a full reservoir - fill it right to the top. Now, use a locking chuck, or a hand pump with a screw-on valve end, or anything the likes and put a few PSI on the aforementioned tyre valve. Presto, instant pressure bleeding system for cheap. Works for me - and I've bled completely dry systems, CB 109 masters, front 109 brake systems and all sorts of nasty setups with it. Total cost is $1.99 for a pack of two valves, and another $1.99 for a tyre valve tool if you don't have one (and you should...). aj"Cheap git - that i am!"r - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 24 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981123 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Richard Clarke"<Richard.Clarke@nre.vic.gov.au> Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1998 08:33:52 +1000 Subject: Re: spring bushings so we've had lots of ranting, raving and chest banging, a number of people saying look in the book a little intelligent analysis some good personal experience and one response that suggested torqueing to 90flbs but the original question was what torque? was the 90flbs the torque on the (locking) nut - I suspect so what does the 'magic' book actually say (not what do you interpret it to mean) lets stop the insults to people who don't agree with what we say and get back to the question If there's one thing I've learned with Landys over the years its that there are often more than one way to tackle most problems, some are better than others, but few are as disaterous as some of the replys to this qustion would seem to imply! - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 25 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981123 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: David Scheidt <david@infocom.com> Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1998 22:23:40 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: Steering Relay Rebuild? On Sun, 22 Nov 1998 DHW4U@aol.com wrote: :Has anyone rebuilt the steering relay on a series IIa replacing the split :washers and spring. One fellow talked about doing it in place. Al Richer wrote an article about doing this in place. Should be in the FAQ, http://www.fourfold.org/LR_FAQ . David - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 26 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981123 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: DNDANGER@aol.com Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1998 22:34:05 EST Subject: Re: not nice In a message dated 98-11-20 13:20:31 EST, you write: for possession of a firearm! >> Hmmmm. Interesting, a french fried firearm story. Bill Lawrence - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 27 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981123 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: DNDANGER@aol.com Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1998 23:03:45 EST Subject: Re: charge warning light In a message dated 98-11-20 14:33:57 EST, you write: << It gets power from the normal supply and, then, I'm guessing, the alternator acts as a ground until it starts spinning. Right so far? >> Wrong so far! The charge lamp is not actually wired to any ground. it is wired to the alternator and to a point in the electrical system which is theoretically at the same potential. When the alternator is operating properly there is no voltage difference so the lamp is off. When the alternator fails the current flows back from the battery thus lighting the lamp. That is why the lamp can be bright or dim or flicker for different symptoms. Bill Lawrence Albq, NM - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 28 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981123 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: DNDANGER@aol.com Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1998 23:12:57 EST Subject: Re: Installing my ujs - tips? In a message dated 98-11-20 15:39:22 EST, you write: << I have beaten them out with the sockets and a sledgehammer before for very stubborn ones, but be sure not to hit the yoke. >> Actually if you use a rawhide hammer you can beat on the outside of the yoke and use the inertia of the cap to pull it out. A little more work but elegant for the pysicist in the crowd. Bill Lawrence Albq, NM - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 29 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981123 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: jimfoo@uswest.net Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1998 21:11:25 -0800 Subject: Re: charge warning light DNDANGER@aol.com wrote: > In a message dated 98-11-20 14:33:57 EST, you write: > << It > gets power from the normal supply and, then, I'm guessing, the alternator > acts as a ground until it starts spinning. Right so far? >> => => Wrong so far! The charge lamp is not actually wired to any ground. it is wired => to the alternator and to a point in the electrical system which is => theoretically at the same potential. I think he is saying "acts like a ground" and you are interpreting as "is a ground". Yes it acts like a ground if it isn't producing voltage or if the voltage is very low compared to the battery. Jim Hall - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 30 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981123 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: jimfoo@uswest.net Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1998 21:15:03 -0800 Subject: Re: Installing my ujs - tips? DNDANGER@aol.com wrote: = = In a message dated 98-11-20 15:39:22 EST, you write: = = << I have beaten them out with the sockets and a sledgehammer before for very stubborn ones, but be sure not to hit the yoke.>> = Actually if you use a rawhide hammer you can beat on the outside of the yoke = and use the inertia of the cap to pull it out. A little more work but elegant = for the pysicist in the crowd. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 31 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981123 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: jimfoo@uswest.net Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1998 21:22:10 -0800 Subject: Re: Installing my ujs - tips? DNDANGER@aol.com wrote: = = In a message dated 98-11-20 15:39:22 EST, you write: = = << I have beaten them out with the sockets and a sledgehammer before for very stubborn ones, but be sure not to hit the yoke.>> = Actually if you use a rawhide hammer you can beat on the outside of the yoke = and use the inertia of the cap to pull it out. A little more work but elegant = for the pysicist in the crowd. I was going to say that luckily Land Rover never injected plastic to hold the caps in place like Ch**y did. Although I don't know for sure, I don't think a rawhide hammer would have had any effect on them. That's why I loke Rovers, soooo much simpler to work on. Give me clips any day! Jim Hall Elephant Chaser 1966 88" - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 32 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981123 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: DNDANGER@aol.com Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1998 23:39:42 EST Subject: Re: bushings In a message dated 98-11-20 20:35:22 EST, you write: There is nothing about torque settings etc. Jim Wolf >> The SIII manual gives a fairly complex procedure to follow to find the neutral position. and then says to tighten the shackle bolts and nuts to 60 -70 lbf- ft. If the shackle bolts are not to be tightened against the central bushing tubes they cannot stress the bushings so this whole procedure is meaningless. Bill Lawrence Albq, NM - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 33 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981123 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: DNDANGER@aol.com Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1998 23:46:37 EST Subject: Re: Smiths Oil Pressure gauge question In a message dated 98-11-20 21:13:21 EST, you write: With the standard Smiths oil pressure gauge, does one use the 10 volt voltage stabilizer to energize it? If so, can one run a third line from the original one (fuel gauge and temp gauge) >> Yes and yes. Bill Lawrence Albq, NM - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 34 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981123 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "d.h.lowe" <dhlowe@idirect.com> Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1998 12:16:47 -0500 Subject: Re: Coolant Flow & Heat Hi John. Brett and Larry just left my place. We put their hardtops on for the winter this afternoon. It was Brett`s last fling ,that`s why he was running topless this morning..Now about those thermostats. The Series III and earlier thermostat housings have an oval opening in the side which leads to the bypass hose. The purpose of this is to prevent the pump from "dead heading" or churning when the thermostat is closed. In other words when the thermostat is closed to the radiator there would be no flow and therefore no circulation through the engine which would be most unhealthy.To prevent this happening the oval opening allows water to by-pass the rad. and circulate water through the engine alone.So, we have a pump that circulates water continually through the engine regardless of the thermostat position.When the engine is cold all the flow goes through the by-pass opening and through the engine because the skirt is raised. As the temperature rises the thermostat begins to open to the rad but as it does so the skirt descends and proportionately closes off the by-pass opening until the flow is solely to the radiator.If you use the "flat" single acting thermostat the by-pass opening remains open continously regardless of engine temperature.The pump of course will pump the same amount but the flow will take the line of least resistance which is through the by-pass rather than the long way around through the radiator, and under high ambient conditions will cause the engine to run hotter than it should. The temp. sender of course is at the front of the engine and does not give you the temp. at the no.4 end of the block.You will therefore have a condition where the temperature on the gauge is reading a bit on the high side but the temperature at the back is significantly higher. I consider this to be one of the causes of the manifold cracking and I`ve cracked a few before I found out about the operation of the double acting `stat. I used to use the flat type because I could get them for 195.F. . On engines from the 110 onwards the thermostat housing was changed and a flat single acting `stat is standard. Instead of the large oval opening it has a hole about 3/8" in diameter instead.This is calculated to provide sufficient flow when the `stat is closed but has a higher resistance than the radiator circuit, consequently the line of least resistance when the `stat is open is through the rad. not the by-pass. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 35 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981123 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Ed Meyer" <emeyer@bowdoin.edu> Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1998 00:27:25 -0500 Subject: Overdrive I am a NEW 1973 series III owner (i.e My 1st rover). The fairly overdrive on this rover screams so loud that it causes actual pain in my ears (making it useless). Is this normal for overdrives. I have heard they are loud, but this one is unbearable. If it is so loud, dose anyone have an idea has to why? E Meyer - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 36 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981123 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "d.h.lowe" <dhlowe@idirect.com> Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1998 12:35:16 -0500 Subject: Re: Coolant Flow & Heat Hi John. Brett and Larry just left my place. We put their hardtops on for the winter this afternoon. It was Brett`s last fling ,that`s why he was running topless this morning..Now about those thermostats. The Series III and earlier thermostat housings have an oval opening in the side which leads to the bypass hose. The purpose of this is to prevent the pump from "dead heading" or churning when the thermostat is closed. In other words when the thermostat is closed to the radiator there would be no flow and therefore no circulation through the engine which would be most unhealthy.To prevent this happening the oval opening allows water to by-pass the rad. and circulate water through the engine alone.So, we have a pump that circulates water continually through the engine regardless of the thermostat position.When the engine is cold all the flow goes through the by-pass opening and through the engine because the skirt is raised. As the temperature rises the thermostat begins to open to the rad but as it does so the skirt descends and proportionately closes off the by-pass opening until the flow is solely to the radiator.If you use the "flat" single acting thermostat the by-pass opening remains open continously regardless of engine temperature.The pump of course will pump the same amount but the flow will take the line of least resistance which is through the by-pass rather than the long way around through the radiator, and under high ambient conditions will cause the engine to run hotter than it should. The temp. sender of course is at the front of the engine and does not give you the temp. at the no.4 end of the block.You will therefore have a condition where the temperature on the gauge is reading a bit on the high side but the temperature at the back is significantly higher. I consider this to be one of the causes of the manifold cracking and I`ve cracked a few before I found out about the operation of the double acting `stat. I used to use the flat type because I could get them for 195.F. . On engines from the 110 onwards the thermostat housing was changed and a flat single acting `stat is standard. Instead of the large oval opening it has a hole about 3/8" in diameter instead.This is calculated to provide sufficient flow when the `stat is closed but has a higher resistance than the radiator circuit, consequently the line of least resistance when the `stat is open is through the rad. not the by-pass. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 37 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981123 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: DNDANGER@aol.com Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1998 00:45:07 EST Subject: Re: Sparkin' Plug Questions In a message dated 98-11-21 15:23:33 EST, you write: << Which one of these burns hotter? Should that one be in the low or high head? Why? >> The heat range of the plug is a measure of how much heat it retains during the operational cycles of the engine. A hotter plug will stay hotter (of course) and this allows it to burn off some of the contaminants which may be present in the cylinder thus avoiding being fouled the down side is that the higher temperature may cause preignition. A cooler plug may foul more easily but is not as likely to cause preignition. My son's SIII was running poorly and I could not get it to stop pinging and after-running. I retarded the timing and that stopped the ping but also made it much slower. When I pulled the plugs I found they were RN14Ys. (could this qualify as a SPOT?) I replaced them with RN12Ys, reset the timing and that completely transformed the performance of the truck. Bill Lawrence Albq, NM - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 38 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981123 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: DNDANGER@aol.com Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1998 01:05:34 EST Subject: Re: Coolant Flow & Heat In a message dated 98-11-21 15:36:36 EST, you write: << So, will there be enough coolant flow for these? I don't want to burn out the pump (which BTW, was rebuilt in the spring). Which direction does the coolant flow, out of the front or the back of the head? Do I need to keep the level of the heaters at or below the head height? I want to mount the second heater on the roofside in back, which would make it higher than the head. Therefore the pump would need to push coolant above it's own height >> The amount of coolant will be whatever it takes to fill the system including whatever you add on. If you place a heater core higher than the radiator you will need to make that your fill point and be sure all of the iar comes out. It should make no difference to the pump since it only recirculates the coolant and the siphon action of the coolant returning will obviate the increased head pressure. The main problem is that if you remove the radiator cap the system will try to drain down to the level of the radiator. It may be tough to get enough coolant to flow through the existing piping to provide an appreciable heating effect. I have toyed with the idea of pulling a larger supply hose off the main return hose to the radiator. Fortunately the weather down here isn't cold enough to force me into such extreme action...yet. Bill Lawrence Albq, NM - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 39 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981123 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: DNDANGER@aol.com Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1998 01:23:52 EST Subject: Re: HELP NEEDED... It's getting dark ! In a message dated 98-11-21 17:23:51 EST, you write: Well, Marc, sounds like you blew the switch. Same thing happened in my old SAAB. Was backpacking at the time and had to drive out 15 miles down a windy mountain road holding the high beam lever with my left hand. Corners were scary when I had to let go in order to shift and steer at the same time! Symtoms sound identical, though, pull it out and give it a look. -joseph and sidney missoula, mt >> Marc, When you say you tapped in to one of your high beams Are you talking about the main power (large red wire) or the relay control (small yellow wire)? If you are pulling all of the power for the lights off of your high beam circuit that would explain your switch failure. If you are only running the relay never mind. When you figure it out I need to know what you discovered as I am installing the same kit in my SIII. Bill Lawrence Albq, NM - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 40 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981123 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: DNDANGER@aol.com Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1998 01:50:42 EST Subject: Re: Smiths Oil Pressure gauge question In a message dated 98-11-22 14:20:27 EST, you write: Nate wrote: >With the standard Smiths oil pressure gauge, does one use the >10 volt voltage stabilizer to energize it? If so, can one run a third >line from the original one (fuel gauge and temp gauge) or is a >second stabilizer needed? Assuming you have an electric oil pressure gauge and not one with a capilliary tube, just run a wire from the origonal voltage stabiliser Ron >> If this is a new installation remember you need to hook it up to a modulating oil pressure sending unit. The SPO of my SIII hooked the guage to the on/off bug light switch on the earlier engine he used for a transplant. Result: Crispy oil pressure guage. I gave up trying to find a good used sending unit (new ones are very expensive) and resorted to a mechanical guage. Very happy. Bill Lawrence Albq, NM - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 41 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981123 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: M.J.Rooth@lboro.ac.uk (Mike Rooth) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1998 09:50:58 +0000 Subject: Re: not nice >for possession of a firearm! Good stuff,Marston's is'nt it Frank?????? Cheers Mike Rooth - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 42 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981123 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Marc Rengers <mr@b4m.com> Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1998 11:53:54 +0100 Subject: Re: Smiths Oil Pressure gauge question >a modulating oil pressure sending unit eh, where can I find a hole to fit it? 2.25 diesel, by the way (on the way, mostly) Marc Rengers Westeremden, Holland mr@b4m.com 0596-551334 (home) 050-3666761 (work) 06-51550521 (GSM) 06-59111461 (pager) http://www.minerva.fk.hanze.nl/landrover/index.html --_ --_ _____|__\___ ________|__\___ | _ | |_ |} | _ | |_ |} "(_)"""""(_)" ""(_)"""""""(_)" 1978 SIII 88" 2.25 diesel 1968 109" SIIa 2.25 petrol reg. 47-DB-13 reg. unknown marine blue green (15 layers of paint) also subscribed to LAND ROVER Owner International (great magazine) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 43 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981123 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Alan_Richer@motorcity2.lotus.com Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1998 06:27:42 -0500 Subject: Re: Smiths Oil Pressure gauge question Yes, you can run a third line to run the gauge - there's sufficient capacity, and the gauges use little current. ajr - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 44 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981123 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Alan_Richer@motorcity2.lotus.com Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1998 06:44:28 -0500 Subject: Re: Bullet Connector Crimping Tool Re: Connector crimper: Don't crimp, solder. it's easier, and you can remove the bullet if necessary to repair things. ajr - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 45 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981123 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Alan_Richer@motorcity2.lotus.com Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1998 06:51:40 -0500 Subject: Re: Steering Relay Rebuild? Dan, I did a write-up on doing this exact thing lat year - take a look at http://www.off-road.com/OVLR/ and look for my stuff under the users' Web page area. ajr - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 46 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981123 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
END OF * LIST DIGEST Input: messages 45 lines 1898 [forwarded 150 whitespace 0] Output: lines 1346 [content 1149 forwarded 117 (cut 33) whitespace 0][ First Message | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981123 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Digest Messages Copyright 1990-1999 by the original poster or/and Empire Rover Owners Society, All rights reserved. Photos & text Copyright 1990-1999 Bill Caloccia, All rights reserved. Empire/LRO List of charges for Empire/LRO Policies
against the distribution of unsolicited commercial e-mail (aka SPAM).
|
![]() |
|||
<--Back |
HOME |
TOP |
Forward --> |
|