[ First Message Last | Table of Contents | <- Digest -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "The Becketts" <hillman@bigpond.com> Date: Wed, 28 Oct 1998 19:44:41 +1100 Subject: The Gods Must be Crazy land Rovers?? All the honking, hooting and laughing... even a few SI's down in the front row... (Yes, even Ron Beckett may have been persuaded to watch a movie)> OK, OK! I admit it. I have seen it BUT I saw it on video. I haven't been to the drive-in to see it. Ron (I liked it!) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 2 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981030 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Con P. Seitl" <seitl@ns.sympatico.ca> Date: Thu, 29 Oct 1998 09:01:49 -0400 Subject: Re: Removal of Cab rear window Alan_Richer@motorcity2.lotus.com wrote: > The best way to get them out is to rip the felt out of the track so you can see > the little bleeders - this means destroying the track, but it's inexpensive ...... >. Inexpensive??? Where you getting yours lately? ;-> My last order from the UK for enough to do the back sliding window set me back 40 bucks, and then I got a bill from the carrier/customs for 46 bucks. Kinda expensive eh? BTW, the shipper was kind enough to cut the tracks to make it a shorter package, now I also have to find a shorter window.... Con Seitl 1973 III 88 "Pig" - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 3 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981030 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: john cranfield <john.cranfield@ns.sympatico.ca> Date: Thu, 29 Oct 1998 09:04:11 -0400 Subject: Re: Station Wagon vs. Hardtop/ Aircraft Aluminum? SPYDERS@aol.com wrote: > In a message dated 10/28/98 9:23:20 PM, you wrote: > <<I built a new > instrument panel from a piece of aircraft aluminum>> > What's the difference between: that, boat aluminum, LR aluminum and tin > (aluminum) foil? Will it last longer? Is it lighter? > I ask only because I see so many references to "aircraft" this or that, and in [ truncated by list-digester (was 11 lines)] > many cases, the advertised thing isn't even certified or up to aircraft-spec. > Is there some tell-tale marking or spec to look for? It is easy to tell the difference between aircraft aluminum and boat aluminum. Before you cut the piece you need just look to see if it has wings on it or an outboard motor....... John and Muddy - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 4 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981030 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Alan_Richer@motorcity2.lotus.com Date: Thu, 29 Oct 1998 08:18:30 -0500 Subject: Re: Removal of Cab rear window Re: Tracking: Why are you buying genuine LR for this stuff? YOu like felt and tree bark, maybe? 8*) I get the tracking I need through a local glass shop - it's not original, but it fits and works. For the prices you're paying stainless steel is available - do it once and forget it forever. Talk to Bill Caloccia about it - that's what he installed in his 88 and it's a beautiful fit. Bliss Marine and some of the other marine suppliers can get it also. aj"the 109 has fiberglass - cheap, good fit and last forever"r - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 5 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981030 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: john cranfield <john.cranfield@ns.sympatico.ca> Date: Thu, 29 Oct 1998 09:12:48 -0400 Subject: Re: Removal of Cab rear window Jon.McDowell@gecits-ap.com wrote: > G'day folks since I haven't had any success on the Australian list I > thought I would try here, > I managed to pick up a cab for my 1950 80 S1 from a farmer's car graveyard > for $50 so I'm not complaining but... > I am trying to remove the rear windows which are opaque. The book says > they are held on by screws through the channel. [ truncated by list-digester (was 32 lines)] > If you have received this mail in error, please tell us > immediately by return email and delete the document. I am sure there are more screws in the bottom of the channel and I would they are about 1/2 rusted away and so prove a real pain in the seating area. 2nd part of your message about getting mail from you and what I MUST do. If I recieve unsolicited Email from any one I deem it to be a gift and will do with it as I see fit without notice. John and Muddy - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 6 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981030 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: NADdMD@aol.com Date: Thu, 29 Oct 1998 08:31:52 EST Subject: Re: Socket size of the hand crank starter dog nut. In a message dated 10/29/98 3:13:12 AM Eastern Standard Time, ogilvi@hgea.org writes: << Need the socket size of the hand crank dog nut. >> I don't have the info at hand but I have the socket at home. I think it's 2 1/16 but I'll have to check that Nate - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 7 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981030 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Alan_Richer@motorcity2.lotus.com Date: Thu, 29 Oct 1998 08:52:46 -0500 Subject: Re: Socket size of the hand crank starter dog nut. Re: Starter dog nut: Isn't that was a smooth-jaw pipe wrench is for? aj"Not entirely tongue-in-cheek"r - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 8 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981030 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: NADdMD@aol.com Date: Thu, 29 Oct 1998 08:46:47 EST Subject: Re: Socket size of the hand crank starter dog nut. In a message dated 10/29/98 8:43:18 AM Eastern Standard Time, Alan_Richer@motorcity2.lotus.com writes: << Isn't that was a smooth-jaw pipe wrench is for? >> Aw, Alan, that's my kind of trick... No I picked one up at Sears for about 3-4 dollars. Works great with a pipe on the Craftsman socket handle... Nate - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 9 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981030 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Art Bitterman <artbitt@rmi.net> Date: Thu, 29 Oct 1998 07:24:44 -0700 Subject: Solihull Society Bill Lawrence asked: Speaking of Frank Jakos, is there anyone on the list from Solihull Society? I am as well as K John Woods-he's the Prez. What can we do for you? Art 1960 SII "Aardvark" - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 10 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981030 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Etienne Farrugia"<ef@InterTekLabs.com> Date: Thu, 29 Oct 1998 15:39:54 +0200 Subject: Engine Identification Can anyone help me with identifying the year of manufacture of TDi 200 engine. Engine # S11l00659A Any help mostly appreciated Regards Etienne - D90 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 11 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981030 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Vel Natarajan" <vel@enteract.com> Date: Thu, 29 Oct 1998 07:46:15 -0600 Subject: Re: Removal of Cab rear window >My last order from >the UK for enough to do the back sliding window set me back 40 bucks, >and then I got a bill from the carrier/customs for 46 bucks. Kinda >Con Seitl JC Whitney sells the stainless steel track for $34.99 for a 6' length of double-track. Thanks to Rob Davis for showing me this source. When it's time to do the rear window track, I'll be replacing it w/ stainless. JC Whitney: 312-431-612 Rgds, Vel Natarajan - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 12 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981030 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Ralph N Bradt <rnbradt@earthlink.net> Date: Thu, 29 Oct 1998 08:11:57 MST Subject: Re: Lucas humor >Another example of this is the dipper/turn signal/high-beam switch on my wife's >Austin-Healey. When I got the car none of it worked well - always intermittent, >twitchy (certain lever angles would make the turn signals work, for example) and >generally horrid. Ahh, yes. Sounds like the classic Lucas 3 position light switch - Dim/Flicker/Off. >With an American or Japanese car I would have thrown the switch out and blown >$200 on a new one. >With the Lucas bits I removed it from the car, polished all of the contacts with >a relay cleaning strip (fine diamond abrasive), lubricated all the pivot points >with Lubriplate after hosing out all the old grease with WD-40 and reinstalled >it - good as new. FWIW, I do the same thing on occasion of failure to switches in my T*y*ta truck. Never have had to invest in a new switch. In general, it seems to me that the newer vehicles, whoever makes them, have more sealed electrical components requireing replacement of the entire component when bad, rather than being able to dissassemble and repair. And I don't even mean the computerized stuff requiring specialized diagnostic equipment which the average backyard wrench can't afford. Old, simple tech vs. "superior" modern tech. My SO and I have 3 cars between us (T*y*ta 4Runner (Foreigner), S*b*ru wagon, and my '70 Series IIa). Currently, I'm in the midst of trying to get 2 of them back on the road. Which one still runs? The Land Rover. Not just because it's my favorite, either, but because it's simple, straight forward technology and I can always make it run, and do it with little more than the quintessential Leatherman and a few other basic tools. Ralph Bradt - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 13 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981030 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Terje Krogdahl <tekr@nextel.no> Date: 29 Oct 1998 16:43:57 +0100 Subject: Re: Socket size of the hand crank starter dog nut. Faye and Peter Ogilvie <ogilvi@hgea.org> writes: > I'm in the process of installing my spare 2.25l 5 main engine in my 88 and > need to remove the crank pulley. Need the socket size of the hand crank > dog nut. > . I'm using a 41mm wrench in my 88". Not an exact fit, but more than close enough. Then I simply put the end of the wrench against the frame, touch the starter, and the nut is loose. Oh, and I disconnect the ignition first! If you use my method, make sure you put the wrench against the frame on the correct side! (Drivers side. BTW, I'm in Norway :-) Otherwise a rather interesting karate-like motion will result, and probably a couple of nasty surprises. -- Terje Krogdahl 1972 SIII 88" 2.25 petrol - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 14 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981030 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "A. P. \"Sandy\" Grice" <rover@pinn.net> Date: Thu, 29 Oct 1998 11:05:43 -0500 Subject: Castrol, et als Jeremy Bartlett <bartlett@slip.net> wrote: >One of the other disadvantages of silicone is that because it doesn't >absorb as much water, mroe water will be present in the lines to cause >corrosion. Gotta disagree on this, Jeremy. Unless you are one of the Ontario mud maniacs and your Rover spend most of its life below sea level, the principle way water gets into the brakes is to be drawn in by the hygroscopic nature of the glycol-based fluid. Silicone is not hygroscopic. Been running with it for five years [knock on wood] now and haven't touched the brakes since, except for having the shoes relined. Cheers *----jeep may be famous, LAND-ROVER is Legendary----* | | | A. P. ("Sandy") Grice | | Rover Owners' Association of Virginia, Ltd. | | Association of North American Rover Clubs | | 1633 Melrose Pkwy., Norfolk, VA 23508-1730 | |(O)757-622-7054, (H)757-423-4898, FAX 757-622-7056 | *----1972 Series III------1996 Discovery SE-7(m)----* - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 15 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981030 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "A. P. \"Sandy\" Grice" <rover@pinn.net> Date: Thu, 29 Oct 1998 11:05:41 -0500 Subject: Light'n up David Scheidt wrote: >The cop asks if I know why he stopped me. I don't, of course. It is >because I failed to use my left turn signal. I had, in fact, not failed to >use my left turn signal. My left turn signal had failed to work. Jeeze, cops in NJ stop people (well *suspicious* ones, at least) who don't use turn signals? Here in Virginia, turn signals must be optional equipment on cars, 'cause no one ever uses 'em. Actually, got stopped for an extinguished tail light once. Walk to the back of the Rover [requisite LR content] with the cop who points to the tail light. I give it a good thump (Joe Lucas almost always responds to discipline) and it works. "Now which light was it?" I ask. First/only time I ever saw a cop laugh. Cheers *----jeep may be famous, LAND-ROVER is Legendary----* | | | A. P. ("Sandy") Grice | | Rover Owners' Association of Virginia, Ltd. | | Association of North American Rover Clubs | | 1633 Melrose Pkwy., Norfolk, VA 23508-1730 | |(O)757-622-7054, (H)757-423-4898, FAX 757-622-7056 | *----1972 Series III------1996 Discovery SE-7(m)----* - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 16 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981030 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Con P. Seitl" <seitl@ns.sympatico.ca> Date: Thu, 29 Oct 1998 12:13:12 -0400 Subject: Re: Removal of Cab rear window Vel Natarajan wrote: > JC Whitney sells the stainless steel track for $34.99 for a 6' length of > double-track. Thanks to Rob Davis for showing me this source. When it's > time to do the rear window track, I'll be replacing it w/ stainless. JC > Whitney: 312-431-612 34.99..converted to Canadian is about 6,000.00 dollars these days. plus shipping, customs and anything else this country can squeeze outta ya. Would probably work out to about 100 bucks tho. Not quite enough in six feet to do a window by my recollection! BTW, not enough in that phone # to dial either! I guess I'm always coming up short! Con Seitl 1973 III 88 "Pig" - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 17 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981030 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: bobnsueb@maxinet.com (Bob and Sue Bernard) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 1998 08:34:33 -0800 Subject: brake fluid Hi, I wonder if anyone else remembers what I am pretty sure that I remember, Back when Girling crimson brake fluid went away, Castrol started selling castrol girling to replace it. I was told by someone that Castrol bought Girling. I looked at a Castrol brake fluid container today but it says nothing like that anymore. Bob Bernard - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 18 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981030 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "=?iso-8859-1?Q?Bj=F8rnung_Jensen?=" <bjjen13b@online.no> Date: Thu, 29 Oct 1998 17:39:15 +0100 Subject: Re.: Freeplay on Drive-shaft The free play on the drive shafts (prop-shaft) sounds excessive at more than a 1/2 turn. I have frequently come across references to this where it is stated that "excessive" play must be avoided. So what is excessive? I can only remember one time seeing a quantification of this and that is that more than a 1/4 turn is bad. I was convinced that my Range Rover had more than that (1/4), however after careful measurement, it was less 1/8! Are you sure that it is more than 1/2??? Bjørnung Jensen Norway - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 19 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981030 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Faure, Marin" <Marin.Faure@PSS.Boeing.com> Date: Thu, 29 Oct 1998 09:33:16 -0800 Subject: Re: Series III From: "K. John Wood" <jwrover@colo-net.com> Date: Wed, 28 Oct 1998 08:49:52 -0700 Subject: Re: Series III >Have you heard anything regarding the fact that a large percentage of the '72, '73 88's came over in blue with white due to a cancled Belgium army order? And that this also confused the issue of station wagon v. hard-top. When I ordered my new Series III in 1973, I specified an all Limestone vehicle as opposed to red/white, blue/white, green/white. The dealer in the San Francisco area had plenty of blue/white 88s but only one all-limestone 88, which is the one I ordered. So I would say, yes, there were a lot of blue/white 88s around in 73, but whether that happened to be a popular color combination back then or it was the result of a cancelled order I have no idea. __________________ C. Marin Faure faurecm@halcyon.com marin.faure@boeing.com (original owner) 1973 Land Rover Series III-88 1991 Range Rover Vogue SE - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 20 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981030 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Faure, Marin" <Marin.Faure@PSS.Boeing.com> Date: Thu, 29 Oct 1998 09:38:00 -0800 Subject: Re: Freeplay on Drive-shaft From: "Luis Manuel Gutierrez" <lgutierr@jccr.co.cr> Date: Wed, 28 Oct 1998 10:22:39 -0600 Subject: Freeplay on Drive-shaft >BUT, and this is the mystery part for me, I was able to rotate the drive shaft more than half a turn before getting any movement on the diff. I found there my cluck. I asked a mech. about it and he told me that it was due to excessive wear of the diff. Somehow I cant swallow that. Based on what I have been told over the years, I suspect your mechanic is right. I have been told by several Land Rover rebuilders over the last 25 years that the maximum "allowable" play in the drive shaft is a quarter of a turn, and less is better. Any more than a quarter-turn and there is something worn out in the differential. I was told several times what the offending part was that wore out and allowd the excess play, but unfortunately I can't remember what it was. Perhaps someone on the list can fill in my blank. _______________ C. Marin Faure Producer Boeing Video Services - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 21 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981030 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Blair Gillespie" <blairg@fix.net> Date: Thu, 29 Oct 1998 09:47:47 -0800 Subject: Series III Colors Good Morning, I have a 1972 88. I have been trying to figure what red they used for that model year. Does anybody know what the correct name for the red they had used? Thanks' Blair - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 22 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981030 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Faure, Marin" <Marin.Faure@PSS.Boeing.com> Date: Thu, 29 Oct 1998 09:58:02 -0800 Subject: Re: Station Wagon vs. Hardtop/ Aircraft Aluminum? From: SPYDERS@aol.com Date: Wed, 28 Oct 1998 21:28:27 EST Subject: Re: Station Wagon vs. Hardtop/ Aircraft Aluminum? In a message dated 10/28/98 9:23:20 PM, you wrote: <<I built a new instrument panel from a piece of aircraft aluminum>> >What's the difference between: that, boat aluminum, LR aluminum and tin (aluminum) foil? Will it last longer? Is it lighter? I ask only because I see so many references to "aircraft" this or that, and in many cases, the advertised thing isn't even certified or up to aircraft-spec. Is there some tell-tale marking or spec to look for? >(I'm not doubting you or your piece of aluminum, as we know you'd use it given your job, etc.) Certain aluminum alloys are specified for aircraft use because they meet whatever requirements the manufacturers and the regulatory agencies have decided they must meet. There are a lot of different aluminum alloys used on airplanes, the specific alloy used being governed by the strength needed, the required resistance to corrosion, and so on. So there is no one "aircraft aluminum." The term, which is actually fairly meaningless, simply implies that whatever the alloy happens to be, it meets one of the standards established in the aircraft industry. The proper way to refer to "aircraft aluminum," or any aluminum for that matter, is by its alloy identifier, for example 2024, 7075, 6061, etc. For the record, 2024 and 7075 are tougher alloys that are usually used for parts that have to stand up under a load. 6061 is a softer alloy and is often used for fuselage skins (I'm talking general aviation planes like Cessnas here, not Boeing and Airbus). The instrument panel I made happens to be "aircraft aluminum" because I got it out of the scrap box in the shop at the company where I flew. I have no idea what the alloy identifier is. For my application, just about any aluminum alloy would have worked fine, although in general, the softer the alloy (which usually means it has a greater aluminum content) the more it will resist corrosion. The piece I used for my panel is pretty tough for its thickness. __________________ C. Marin Faure faurecm@halcyon.com marin.faure@boeing.com (original owner) 1973 Land Rover Series III-88 1991 Range Rover Vogue SE - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 23 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981030 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Paul Quin <Paul_Quin@pml.com> Date: Thu, 29 Oct 1998 10:03:20 -0800 Subject: Landie Aluminium Land Rover Aluminium is actually an Aluminium / Magnesium alloy, is it not?? Birmabright by any other name. Paul in Victoria. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 24 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981030 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Luis Manuel Gutierrez" <lgutierr@jccr.co.cr> Date: Thu, 29 Oct 1998 12:05:17 -0600 Subject: RE: Freeplay on Drive-shaft >Are you sure that it is more than 1/2??? >Bjørnung Jensen I will meassure it exactly tonight, but I think if it is not right it is pretty close. Lic. LUIS MANUEL GUTIERREZ CHACON Jose Cartellone Construcciones Civiles S.A. E-mail: lgutierr@jccr.co.cr Tel: (506) 296 2743 Fax: (506) 296 2744 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 25 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981030 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: TeriAnn Wakeman <twakeman@cruzers.com> Date: Thu, 29 Oct 98 10:56:17 -0800 Subject: LR 6 cyl & 4 cyl frame/body differences?? I'm looking for an education on the differences in 4 cylinder series rigs and 6 cyl series rigs...besides the engine. I know they have a different bulkhead. I suspect that the transmission cross member or transfer case mounts may be in different locations. Anyone out there an expect on the differences & can provide distances between different frame part locations??? People talk about more space for mounting things in a 6 cyl LR & I'm wondering if it is more than just bulkhead shape. If it is, what would it take to move stuff from the 4 cyl location to the 6 cyl location?? Yes I'm still evaluating engine/transmission conversion possibilities & a 140 HP Nissan 6 cylinder diesel with a heavy duty Nissan five speed transmission coupled to a Rover transfer case is looking real interesting. Esp with a fifth gear being overdrive, HP & torque peaks at comprible RPMs to LR engines, and fuel milage somewhere between 27 MPG & 34 MPG. Take care, TeriAnn Wakeman The Green Rover, rebuilt and Santa Cruz, California and maintained using parts from twakeman@cruzers.com British Pacific 800-554-4133 http://www.cruzers.com/~twakeman Walk in harmony with the earth and all her creatures and you will create beauty wherever you go. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 26 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981030 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: AKBLACKLEY@aol.com Date: Thu, 29 Oct 1998 14:39:55 EST Subject: Lucas Testimonials I completely agree with the postings of Alan and John concerning the bad rap that Lucas electrics have had to endure. Most problems can be easily dealt with as Alan points out so well. Most problems I ve heard about (burnt wiring harnesses etc.) often came about because the owner hacked things up, used hardware store connectors (also guilty). The basic wiring is very sound and long lasting, and if the owner understands the color coding, easy to trace. The key to a successful system are: 1) A good quality battery with good ground connections; 2) good ground strap at the engine and good ground connections in general; 3) a clean or new fuse box (cheap insurance); 4) a good generator or alternator.That said it should be admitted that Lucas alternators arent the best.... 5) clean, tight connections at the components themselves. Almost any Lucas component found on Series trucks (or early Rangies or any other Britmobile) can be cleaned, repaired, and reused. I recently restored a 69 MGB and debated using a Delco in place of the stock 18ACR. Since I wanted the under bonnet area to look original on that car I found that the Autozone parts stores carry a rebuilt Lucas with a lifetime warranty for about $75, taxed and out the door. So far so good. I have heard through the MG lists that they also carry other rebuilt Lucas bits including distributors. I havent checked them yet for Land Rover products yet, but many MGB bits will work on a Series even if they dont have a specific listing. One caveat on the above: the Lucas engineering on the later rubber bumper MGs leaves a LOT to be desired. Many weird interconnections. On my 69 tho' its a piece of cake. Cheers, Andy Blackley 83 Range Rover, 69 MGB - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 27 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981030 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Luis Manuel Gutierrez" <lgutierr@jccr.co.cr> Date: Thu, 29 Oct 1998 13:54:32 -0600 Subject: RE: Freeplay on Drive-shaft >Based on what I have been told over the years, I suspect your mechanic is >right. I have been told by several Land Rover rebuilders over the last 25 >years that the maximum "allowable" play in the drive shaft is a quarter of a >turn, and less is better. Any more than a quarter-turn and there is >something worn out in the differential. I was told several times what the >offending part was that wore out and allowd the excess play, but >unfortunately I can't remember what it was. Perhaps someone on the list can >fill in my blank. This sounds pretty bad then. It would be very usefull to know which are the parts probably worn out, to have an estimate of cost before attempting the fix. Lic. LUIS MANUEL GUTIERREZ CHACON Jose Cartellone Construcciones Civiles S.A. E-mail: lgutierr@jccr.co.cr Tel: (506) 296 2743 Fax: (506) 296 2744 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 28 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981030 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Ray_Burton@notes.sabre.com Date: Thu, 29 Oct 1998 14:37:07 -0600 Subject: Re: Series III brochures Sandy Grice wrote: >These are new 'cept where Bill Kloc's dog >Ace kinda chewed on one corner a bit. Does anyone know where Bill Kloc is now and if he's still a LR owner? Sandy, correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't what is refered to as the "Hard-top" in the literature, also known as a "Regular" at one time? Cheers, Ray Burton '64 ser.2a 109 SW '70 ser.2a 88 regular or hardtop (even though it has a SW tag on th back) '84 RR - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 29 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981030 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Richard Clarke"<Richard.Clarke@nre.vic.gov.au> Date: Fri, 30 Oct 1998 08:02:45 +1000 Subject: Re:Station Wagons & Hardtops I don't think it should be a real problem with the 109s - that second set of hinges on the side (connected to the second set of doors) usually gives away the station wagon :-) rom: lndrvr@ldd.net (BRIAN WILLOUGHBY) Date: Wed, 28 Oct 1998 09:26:21 -0600 Subject: Station Wagons & Hardtops So...we're debating what constitutes a "Station Wagon" again. I don't think anyone has mentioned this feature yet: the back seats. 88-inch SWs should have the individually folding jumps seats; HTs have either no seats or the standard, fixed bench seat. The 109s confuse things a bit since they were all equipped with rear bench seats (yes, both 10 and 12 passenger). I've checked this against my "Land-Rover Series II and IIA Parts Catalogue for Petrol and Diesel Models" (The Rover Company Limited, Solihull, Warwickshire, England, Technical Publication TP365A, Part No. 4656, July 1964). I believe the same holds true for Series III models in regard to the seats. Well, that's my contribution to the mass confusion. Brian Willoughby 1960 Land-Rover Series II 88" S.W. "The Lady Eleanor" - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 30 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981030 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Sski3@aol.com Date: Thu, 29 Oct 1998 17:24:17 EST Subject: Heater switch wiring.... I may be wrong but I took my heater blower out and replaced it with a TR7 blower motor, and found that the resistor is in the old blower housing. That is where you get the two speeds. Regards Steve F 69 SIIA 88 bug eye - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 31 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981030 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: car4doc <car4doc@concentric.net> Date: Thu, 29 Oct 1998 16:41:11 -0600 Subject: Re: LR 6 cyl & 4 cyl frame/body differences?? Hi TeriAnn, Well the NADA frame differance is to move the rear transmission mount xmamber rearward about 4". The flloors & bulkhead are modified to give more room for the 6cyl. The brakes are larger, current 110 I believe. Less expensive then 4 cyl 109 brakes. & there is a brake booster. Of course when you move the transmission back the drive shafts change. I have both frames here(for friends) & the 4" move of the trans mount is the main differance. Regards, Rob Davis_Chicago,. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 32 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981030 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Mark Oellermann" <MarkO@vrt.com.au> Date: Fri, 30 Oct 1998 09:26:12 +1000 Subject: Re: Overdrive alternative >That's very interesting Joseph - do you know how to contact them? >Ray I did a little looking into this about 6 months ago. Try - Maxi-Drive Engineering 4 Ryecroft Street Carrara QLD 4211 +61 7 5530-3934 or FWD in Brisbane +61 7 38489323 ~$AU 1100 or Discovery Automotive Perth +61 8 93095400 Thomas Tickel or Contact Four Wheel Drives (03) 98 900 500 http://www.fwd.com.au/ $AU 850 > Who knows what time (or day, for that matter!) it is down there. Don't worry, we start every day ahead of you guys ;-) Mark. ___________________________ Mark Oellermann 1976 SIII 109", Holden 186 6cyl E-mail: Mark.O@ibm.net ___________________________ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 33 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981030 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Peter Hope" <phope@hawaii.rr.com> Date: Thu, 29 Oct 1998 14:26:00 -1000 Subject: Re: Two and One-Half Series II Rovers Spotted on Maui >Does anyone on the list live on Maui? I know Peter lives in Hawaii (and >maybe other members do, also) but I don't know if anyone lives on or travels >regularly to Maui. About one mile west from Oheo Gulch (often called the >Seven Sacred Pools) on Highway 31 we spotted two fairly complete Series >Rovers plus a complete hardtop. Hmmm, maybe I will have to get a hop over there this weekend and check them out. Just curious, were they both SWB's? Peter, you know about these? Aloha Pete - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 34 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981030 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Peter Hope" <phope@hawaii.rr.com> Date: Thu, 29 Oct 1998 14:40:37 -1000 Subject: Re: LR 6 cyl & 4 cyl frame/body differences?? >Yes I'm still evaluating engine/transmission conversion possibilities & a >140 HP Nissan 6 cylinder diesel with a heavy duty Nissan five speed >transmission coupled to a Rover transfer case is looking real >interesting. Just curious, does anyone know if the Nissan diesel is the same engine that IH used for their Scouts in the late 70's? Mahalo Pete - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 35 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981030 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Peter Hope" <phope@hawaii.rr.com> Date: Thu, 29 Oct 1998 15:05:02 -1000 Subject: Re: The Gods Must be Crazy >I've got to get a winch like that! >Bill Lawrence Got the winch, and it sure is one heavy bugger. 260lbs according to the manual. Even more of a coincidence. Was just flipping through the channels and the movie is on the Comedy Channel right this minute Aloha Pete - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 36 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981030 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: john cranfield <john.cranfield@ns.sympatico.ca> Date: Thu, 29 Oct 1998 21:27:25 -0400 Subject: Re: Freeplay on Drive-shaft Luis Manuel Gutierrez wrote: > >Based on what I have been told over the years, I suspect your mechanic is > >right. I have been told by several Land Rover rebuilders over the last 25 > >years that the maximum "allowable" play in the drive shaft is a quarter of > a > >turn, and less is better. Any more than a quarter-turn and there is > >something worn out in the differential. I was told several times what the > >offending part was that wore out and allowd the excess play, but [ truncated by list-digester (was 13 lines)] > This sounds pretty bad then. It would be very usefull to know which are the > parts probably worn out, to have an estimate of cost before attempting the Luis, check the condition of the splines of the axle drivers (the piece that connects the axles to the hubs) If you have the 24 spline version they are prone to wear and will increase the play in the drive shaft a lot. I thought I was going to need a new Salisbury diff but 2 new drivers took away all the excess play. I hope such and easy fix works for you. John and Muddy - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 37 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981030 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: john cranfield <john.cranfield@ns.sympatico.ca> Date: Thu, 29 Oct 1998 21:17:53 -0400 Subject: Re: LR 6 cyl & 4 cyl frame/body differences?? TeriAnn Wakeman wrote: > I'm looking for an education on the differences in 4 cylinder series rigs > and 6 cyl series rigs...besides the engine. > I know they have a different bulkhead. I suspect that the transmission > cross member or transfer case mounts may be in different locations. > Anyone out there an expect on the differences & can provide distances > between different frame part locations??? [ truncated by list-digester (was 20 lines)] > comprible RPMs to LR engines, and fuel milage somewhere between 27 MPG & > 34 MPG. The transmission/transfercase is about 4inches to the rear as is gearbox mount xmember. The bulkhead is shaped so that the transmission tunnel is shorter than a 4 cylinder as the seat box is in the same place. I can't visualise where the extra space for mounting stuff would come from. The rear drive shaft is shorter and the front is longer. The Australians seem to like the conversion you talk about but Iam not sure that the Nissan 5 speed they use was ever available in North America. It is used in heavier trucks than Nissan exported to this continent. However if you can find a source let us know. John and Muddy - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 38 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981030 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: NADdMD@aol.com Date: Thu, 29 Oct 1998 20:45:22 EST Subject: Re: Starter dog socket Hi Peter, It's actually 1 and 11/16 not what I said earlier. You'll also need and adaptor for it, it's a BIG drive (3/4 I think) If you go to Sears, you'll see what I mean. Nate - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 39 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981030 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: DNDANGER@aol.com Date: Thu, 29 Oct 1998 21:06:12 EST Subject: Re: Solihull Society In a message dated 98-10-29 09:31:55 EST, you write: I am as well as K John Woods-he's the Prez. What can we do for you? Art 1960 SII "Aardvark" >> I am/was a member. Joined after the 97 event at Red River. I have received only two newsletters in a year and a half and have apparently been forgotten. I noticed that a portion of the entry fee for the event at Steamboat this year was $30 for a mandatory membership. My question, If I am forgotten and I only live 400 miles away, what kind of value for money do you expect to give to "members'" all over the world? Can someone send me a membership renewal form? can someone convince me there is a benefit to using it? Sorry. I realize you are not the person I need to speak to about this but, if you would, could you please pass it along to that person? I'm really not that hard to get along with but I feel someone has dropped the ball. Hope to see you some time when I'm in a better mood. Speaking of which I think there's a beer in the refr. Bill Lawrence Albq, NM - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 40 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981030 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Jarvis64@aol.com Date: Thu, 29 Oct 1998 21:11:36 EST Subject: Army Recovery Manual Hey folks, Just got one of these yesterday, and it's full (well, about half full, which is pretty good for an Army manual) of good stuff. It has all kinds of tables for calculating load on a system based on number of sheaves (blocks, basically) and stuff. Great improvised recovery/ repair tips, too. Like putting a short log upright in a hole near your axle, leaning it against the bottom of your axle, and driving up onto it to get your wheel off the ground if you don't have a jack. If you're confused, get Army FM 9-43-2 (Marine Corps FMFRP 4-34, Air Force TO 36-1-181) entitled Recovery and Battlefield Damage Assessment and Repair. I think the Army has an on-line pubs site somewhere, from which you could download all applicable stuff (probably about 20 little [5x8] pages of really interesting stuff.) Bill - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 41 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981030 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: DNDANGER@aol.com Date: Thu, 29 Oct 1998 22:37:51 EST Subject: Re: Removal of Cab rear window In a message dated 98-10-29 08:06:34 EST, you write: Inexpensive??? Where you getting yours lately? ;-> My last order from the UK for enough to do the back sliding window set me back 40 bucks, and then I got a bill from the carrier/customs for 46 bucks. Kinda expensive eh? BTW, the shipper was kind enough to cut the tracks to make it a shorter package, now I also have to find a shorter window.... Con Seitl 1973 III 88 "Pig" >> Try any auto glass supplier. Ask for rigid felt run. When in doubt take a piece along with you. It's not that rare. It is, however, that expensive. Bill Lawrence Albq, NM - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 42 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981030 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Vel Natarajan" <vel@enteract.com> Date: Thu, 29 Oct 1998 22:17:31 -0600 Subject: Re: Removal of Cab rear window From: Con P. Seitl <seitl@ns.sympatico.ca> > 34.99..converted to Canadian is about 6,000.00 dollars these days. >plus shipping, customs and anything else this country can squeeze outta >ya. Would probably work out to about 100 bucks tho. Not quite enough in >six feet to do a window by my recollection! BTW, not enough in that The six feet is for DOUBLE-track channel. (no need to lay the track side-by side) Is it enough then? >phone # to dial either! I guess I'm always coming up short! Oops, why don't you try the web-page instead: http://www.jcwhitney.co :-) That should be 312-431-6102 I noticed the web-page doesn't have the channel, but the catalog does. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 43 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981030 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: DNDANGER@aol.com Date: Fri, 30 Oct 1998 00:03:11 EST Subject: Re: The Gods Must be Crazy In a message dated 98-10-29 20:12:20 EST, you write: << Got the winch, and it sure is one heavy bugger. 260lbs according to the manual. >> Probably more appropriate on a 109 than an 80... Hey! ive got one of those! Bill Lawrence - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 44 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981030 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Piet Fourie : pah@saao.ac.za" <pah@saao.ac.za> Date: Fri, 30 Oct 1998 07:19:30 +0200 (SAT) Subject: Re: Lucas Testimonials Hi all A friend of mine is busy restoring his old MG and is looking for a MG discussion group. Does anybody know the address of such a group. I find it quite interresting that The Gods must be crazy is so popular with the LR crowd. I know the two actors in that LR scene. They are married to each other now. Piet 1955 S1 1980 RR (with leaking petrol tank and power steering box) - no oil leaks. P.A.H. Fourie ( pah@saao.ac.za ) South African Astronomical Observatory. P.O. Box 25 Sutherland 6920 South Africa. Tel 023 5711135. Fax 023 5711413 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 45 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981030 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: TeriAnn Wakeman <twakeman@cruzers.com> Date: Thu, 29 Oct 98 21:24:07 -0800 Subject: Re: LR 6 cyl & 4 cyl frame/body differences?? >The Australians seem to like the conversion you talk about but Iam not >sure that the Nissan 5 speed they use was ever available in North >America. It is used in heavier trucks than Nissan exported to this ;>continent. However if you can find a source let us know. The light duty diesel trucks identified with a UD inside a circle are Nissan commercial trucks. The lightest duty one has a 140 HP intercooled turbo diesel with five speed transmission. The others have a totally different 210 HP engine with different transmissions. I'm trying to find a place with info on the light duty commercial engine & 5 speed transmission. If worst comes to worst I would consider importing a transmission from Australia & keeping parts on hand. TeriAnn Wakeman If you send me direct mail, please Santa Cruz, California start the subject line with TW - twakeman@cruzers.com I will be sure to read the message http://www.cruzers.com/~twakeman Walk in harmony with the earth and all her creatures and you will create beauty wherever you go. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 46 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981030 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: DNDANGER@aol.com Date: Fri, 30 Oct 1998 00:40:50 EST Subject: Re: Lucas Testimonials In a message dated 98-10-30 00:21:28 EST, you write: A friend of mine is busy restoring his old MG and is looking for a MG discussion group. Does anybody know the address of such a group. Try Majordomo@autox.team.net and check the lists. I find it quite interresting that The Gods must be crazy is so popular with the LR crowd. I know the two actors in that LR scene. They are married to each other now. >> A man to be envied. Bill Lawrence Albuquerque, NM (USA) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 47 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981030 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Peter Hope" <phope@hawaii.rr.com> Date: Thu, 29 Oct 1998 20:21:42 -1000 Subject: Re: The Gods Must be Crazy ><< Got the winch, and it sure is one heavy bugger. 260lbs according to the > manual. >Probably more appropriate on a 109 than an 80... Hey! ive got one of those! Yeah I am going to have to fit the heavy duty front springs I guess. Pete - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 48 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981030 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Joseph Broach <jbroach@selway.umt.edu> Date: Fri, 30 Oct 1998 00:02:45 -0700 Subject: Re: LR 6 cyl & 4 cyl frame/body differences?? >TW wrote: >The light duty diesel trucks identified with a UD inside a circle are >Nissan commercial trucks. The lightest duty one has a 140 HP intercooled >turbo diesel with five speed transmission. The others have a totally >different 210 HP engine with different transmissions. Terriann, I suppose you've already found this website, but here it is for those who are interested: http://www.nissandiesel.com/. Gives a lot of good info on the UD trucks here in the states. Keep us all updated on your research! -joseph and sidney missoula, mt - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 49 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981030 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Faye and Peter Ogilvie <ogilvi@hgea.org> Date: Thu, 29 Oct 1998 21:06:22 Subject: Re: Two and One-Half Series II Rovers Spotted on Maui I queried him on them. He's not sure what condition they are in as he only had a quick look around them. Said they appeared complete but thinks they are probably rusty as they are very close to the ocean. Go have a look and tell me what you find. Aloha Peter At 02:26 PM 10/29/98 -1000, you wrote: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 50 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981030 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Marcel Viljoen <marcelv@msmail.cs.unp.ac.za> Date: Fri, 30 Oct 1998 10:08:59 +0200 Subject: Coasting noise problem Hi I am new to the list, and want to kick off with a technical query. This pertains to my Landie, Mildred, a IIA 88 that has had a new lease of life given to her, and at least 3 S1 80s in Pietermaritzburg. The vehicles run fine, but when coasting ie travelling on a flat/downhill with slight throttle there is a *HUGE* clattering racket, which I cant identify - seems to be prop/transfer box region. Slipping the vehicle into neutral immediatelly stops the noise. It can happen at any speed. Now, Mildred did not have this problem until extensive rebuilding took place. I will try and list pertinent bits. Both props front and rear recond (incl sliding joints) (these have been retested) Rear axle changed to Salisbury (rear output and diff checked to be parrallel) New springs fitted all round (set to 170) Now it does seem that the rear output shaft and high gear wheel are significantly worn - could this have an impact? TIA Marcel Marcel Viljoen Department of Computer Science and Information Systems Natal University, Pietermaritzburg Private Bag X01 Scottsville Pietermaritzburg 3209 Phone +27 (331)260-564 Fax +27 (331)260-5966 Cell +27 82 445 7191 email marcelv@compnt.cs.unp.ac.za. Entropy requires no maintenance - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 51 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981030 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Shaun Fisher" <FisherS@natburo.kzntl.gov.za> Date: Fri, 30 Oct 1998 11:14:39 +0200 Subject: For Sale Hi I have a Series IIA88 for sale. This Landie is partialy rebuilt. I live in Pietermaritzburg, South Africa. If there is anyone interested my Email is: fishers@natburo.kzntl.gov.za Thanx Shaun Fisher Tel: 27-0331-952440 w or 27-0331-443612 h - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 52 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981030 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Allen Northwood <nella@enternet.com.au> Date: Fri, 30 Oct 1998 20:23:50 +1000 Subject: alloy threaded welsh plug Hi everyone. Right up high on the engine block (petrol 2.25) under the manifolds are two threaded alloy plugs, and one has developed a leak. I've removed the wing and manifolds and replaced it but must have damaged the thread in the block getting the old out because the replacement plug was impossible to screw in all the way and it still bloody leaks. Does anyone know whether it is possible to repair the thread, or do I need to change the block? Any advice gratefully received. TIA Allen Sydney, Aust. '69 IIA 109 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 53 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981030 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Con P. Seitl" <seitl@ns.sympatico.ca> Date: Fri, 30 Oct 1998 07:12:22 -0400 Subject: Re: Removal of Cab rear window Vel Natarajan wrote: > The six feet is for DOUBLE-track channel. (no need to lay the track side-by > side) Is it enough then? >. Thanks for the link and phone #. The back window does require 'double track' on the bottom and on the top. Total inches is about 75, about 3 inches short of six feet, but what about the two sides? It needs single track only, but still needs it. Con Seitl 1973 III 88 "Pig" - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 54 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981030 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
END OF * LIST DIGEST Input: messages 54 lines 2278 [forwarded 194 whitespace 0] Output: lines 1478 [content 1227 forwarded 150 (cut 44) whitespace 0][ First Message | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981030 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Digest Messages Copyright 1990-1999 by the original poster or/and Empire Rover Owners Society, All rights reserved. Photos & text Copyright 1990-1999 Bill Caloccia, All rights reserved. Empire/LRO List of charges for Empire/LRO Policies
against the distribution of unsolicited commercial e-mail (aka SPAM).
|
![]() |
|||
<--Back |
HOME |
TOP |
Forward --> |
|