[ First Message Last | Table of Contents | <- Digest -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Ron Franklin" <oldhaven@mail.biddeford.com> Date: Sun, 23 Aug 1998 08:46:51 -0500 Subject: cummins TeriAnn I hate to even mention this since I am taking so long to get it done, but I have a 109 series coil chassis with a Cummins diesel installed in it sitting in my barn right now. Most people don't know that the very same engine, less two cylinders, is available as the Cummins 4BT, 3.9 L, 115 HP, 260 ft/lbs torque at 1200 rpm, 300 at 2600, turbo with water jacket intercooler or air exchange intercooler. And it is just slightly larger than the LR 2.25 if you add in the carburettor, though it weighs 705 lbs and requires some creative engineering of mounts. I will be using it with the recessed grill nose and minimum rework of the 110 bulkhead where the 13 inch !!! clutch housing and Ford 5 speed F350 trans go. It wll not fit in an 88 due to length of the drivetrain, ( ZF 5 spd transmission and NP 205 transfer case, GM 14 bolt rear, F250 front.) Anyway, the point is it will fit between the rails, it will require beefier drive train, but could probably use LR Defender coil axles if driven carefully, (see 4.2 petrol engine specs), and will require some mods to a galv coiler frame, (mine is a Walker which has the front crossmember ahead of the breakfast, and the removable crossmember must be repositioned. It also has a 1.5 inch body lift.) The back end of the engine and most of the accessories are the same as the Dodge 5.9 cummins, so the easiest route to go would be to use a Dodge diesel NV 4500 and an earlier NP 205 to match the front axle you choose, since the width of the later chain drive transfer cases is a limiting factor. I would do this if I were starting over. I have made and learned from all the mistakes possible here so would be glad to speak privately to anyone interested, or would post jpg's to the DELRC website if anyone cares. As I said, I'm rather embarrassed as old hands on this list will remember I started this project 5 years ago. I have no idea how it will turn out as a road vehicle, but have worked out the rpm, tranny, axle ratio, tire size thing for this engine and it looks rather promising, both at cruise and in low 4WD, and Dodge trucks do well using the same rpm ranges . Interestingly enough it will be a two doormobile like yours, since I have a Dormie top, so I have been lurking rather heavily on your own progress, and profiting from your own adventures. That's the plan anyway, though if noise, vibration, heat or other things make it more uncomfortable than a 2.25 109 Dormobile at 75 mph, I may just use it offroad. (humor intended). See also Cummins 6AT for even more fantasy. Same size as a Chevy six. Comes with factory adapter plate for GM trans. Both these engines are well thought out and relatively common replacements for Ford and Chevy pickups. There is a company in the Southwest doing several a month. They were also used in delivery vans and bread trucks. Ron Franklin Bowdoin, Maine, USA - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 2 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980824 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Allen Northwood <nella@enternet.com.au> Date: Sun, 23 Aug 1998 23:10:19 +1000 Subject: breaking axles Hi everyone. In the discussions/surveys about broken axle shafts, are we discussing Rover *and* Salisbury diffs/axles? The Salisbury axles supposed to be a fair bit stronger, but do they also break under normal use? TIA Allen '69 109 Sydney, Aust. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 3 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980824 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Joseph Broach <mbroach@utk.edu> Date: Sun, 23 Aug 1998 10:05:40 -0400 (EDT) Subject: 80 psi, what the... Hey gang, In preparation for its planned launch from the garage, I bought some new tires for Sidney, my IIa 88 frameover. I was lucky enough to find 4 Trac-Edge clones (Country Squires by name) at the local Co-op. The tire (like the Trac Edge) is rated at a max press of 80psi, but I always figured that this was just for heavy pickup loads or something. The guys mounting the tires, though, said they wouldn't run them below 65-70 psi, even with the radial tubes I had mounted. Surely this isn't right. What pressure do you run in your Trac-Edges and similar? Thanks, overinflated in knoxville, joseph '67 IIa 88 "Sidney" bumblingly restored by his faithful owner - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 4 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980824 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: john cranfield <john.cranfield@ns.sympatico.ca> Date: Sun, 23 Aug 1998 12:08:56 -0300 Subject: Re: 1959 SII distributor timing q's, please help Clayton Kirkwood wrote: > Out once again on the truck doing this and that. I proceeded to set the > timing and handcranked the engin over to where the TDC, 3*, and 6* markings > were on the flywheel. The manual says to set to 6* which I did, and then > connect a test light between the LT at the distributor and ground which I > did. > Looking at the engine from the right hand side of the truck, the rotor was > basically towards 6 o'clock: this I would assume would be the start of [ truncated by list-digester (was 24 lines)] > get good acceleration). Do I have the advance off? I just don't understand > why the rotor appears to be starting contact with plug 2 and not plug 1!!!! Remember the Distributor turns counterclockwise. your plug wires are in the right place. Now bearing in mind that the motion is counterclockwise are you sure that the rotor is not nearing number 1 ? John and Muddy - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 5 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980824 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: john cranfield <john.cranfield@ns.sympatico.ca> Date: Sun, 23 Aug 1998 12:14:27 -0300 Subject: Re: 59 SII engine RPM questions Clayton Kirkwood wrote: > After setting my timing (see previous posting and associated problems), I > turned to trying to determine my RPMs in an attempt to set the Rochester > idle mix. I broke down several months ago and picked up a Fluke 88 (one of > the really nice Flukes which comes with an RPM inductive lead). I follow (I > think :>) the instructions on getting an RPM reading: connect inductive lead > around a plug wire, with specific side of pickup toward spark plug, set > meter to RPM, set to type 2 (4cycle, non-DIS) and then start engine (at [ truncated by list-digester (was 23 lines)] > What am I missing here?? > TIA, try reversing the direction of the inductive pickup. I don't supose it'll work though. sounds like you may have the meter on the wrong scale.You bought the best when you got the Fluke. check the book with the meter there may be a help line to Fluke. They used to have one. John and Muddy - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 6 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980824 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: john cranfield <john.cranfield@ns.sympatico.ca> Date: Sun, 23 Aug 1998 12:18:44 -0300 Subject: Re: rochester adjustments on 59 SII Clayton Kirkwood wrote: > As you may have read severl other recent posts, I am trying to time and set > carb for said vehicle. I have the rochester carb and no real info on how to > properly set the mixture correctly. If I have the ignition set correctly, > then the last step should be setting the carb correctly. I have bluish smoke > all of the time and it sputters black droplets out the tail pipe and the 100 > miles new plugs, I believe properly gapped, have a dry block suet all over > them (not wet). The Haynes manual suggests this symptom is caused be overly [ truncated by list-digester (was 12 lines)] > doesn't adequately explain setting the carb up. Any pointers would be > greatly appreciated. sounds like your float level is too high. you may have to bend the tab that pushes the needle valve shut so that it closes a little sooner. There is a measurement for this for various vehicles but I could never find the spec for a Land Rover application so you'll have to experiment a bit. John and Muddy - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 7 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980824 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: john cranfield <john.cranfield@ns.sympatico.ca> Date: Sun, 23 Aug 1998 12:24:58 -0300 Subject: Re: breaking axles Allen Northwood wrote: > Hi everyone. > In the discussions/surveys about broken axle shafts, are we discussing > Rover *and* Salisbury diffs/axles? > The Salisbury axles supposed to be a fair bit stronger, but do they also > break under normal use? very rarely. This a version of the Dana 60 axle used in full sized 3/4 ton 4x4 Fords with a 7.3 diesel. The only trouble I have had with mine is the splines in the driver wearing out but that is easy to spot and easy to fix as it is right at the outerend in the center of the hub. John and Muddy - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 8 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980824 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: john cranfield <john.cranfield@ns.sympatico.ca> Date: Sun, 23 Aug 1998 12:33:06 -0300 Subject: Re: 80 psi, what the... Joseph Broach wrote: > Hey gang, > In preparation for its planned launch from the garage, I bought some new > tires for Sidney, my IIa 88 frameover. I was lucky enough to find 4 > Trac-Edge clones (Country Squires by name) at the local Co-op. The tire > (like the Trac Edge) is rated at a max press of 80psi, but I always figured > that this was just for heavy pickup loads or something. The guys mounting > the tires, though, said they wouldn't run them below 65-70 psi, even with [ truncated by list-digester (was 11 lines)] > the radial tubes I had mounted. Surely this isn't right. What pressure do > you run in your Trac-Edges and similar? Thanks, That guy must be the brother of your dentist. That pressure will shake your teeth out!. It is unlikely that you'll need more than 30 psi. Much more than that will wear out the center of the tread prematurely as the will only be a narrow band of tread on the road. You can check this by wetting your tire and driving over a dry piece of paper and comparing the imprint with the actual tread. John and Muddy. Ps you may have started a lenghty thread here as some people are convinced that you need lots of the restore the original "ride" of a Land Rover on 600-16 biasply tires :) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 9 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980824 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: andy Smith <andy@bobstar.demon.co.uk> Date: Sat, 22 Aug 1998 18:35:06 +0100 Subject: 50TH anniversary Defender.(long) Just thought I would let you all know that I have just come back from an Evans Halshaw driving event at Waterhouses near Leek. They wanted experianced [g] drivers to take vehicles round with some of there customers. So arrived this morning Saturday to see various Range Rovers, Discoveries, FreeLanders a Defender 110 and finally a Defender 90 50TH anniversary limited edition numbered GB076 just waiting to be driven!. So after taking my mates series 1 trialler round with a few people strapped in tightly I was waiting to get in a slightly newer motor and one of the club members pulled up in the Defender 90 and asked if I would like to take over from him so I did not refuse!. The 90 is awesome with that 4 litre V8 up front and is effortless to drive with the automatic taking care of things, the accelaration in low-box was so instant I could not believe it. The engine was so silky smooth it was an absolute dream to drive it goes sideways ever so easy it was only shod on BFG Tracedges so when it got a bit greasy you know what happens. But for the anniversary model there is a couple of things it should have electric windows and central locking on a £26000 car should be a must. Still it was a fabulous thing to drive and i will probably always remeber it. -- andy Smith 1965 V8 ser2a swb 1971 2.25 Petrol swb Staffs and Shrops Land Rover Club. Tamworth Staffs. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 10 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980824 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: RykRover@aol.com Date: Sun, 23 Aug 1998 11:42:29 EDT Subject: Re: Newbie Question for the experts... Hi Dave, My `96 Disco SD has been very good mechanically and after the hub seals, headliner , dash. Overall everything has been cosmetic in nature. So I say to you find a `96 or `97 that is still under warranty , leave it outside so that you can get the dash replaced when it starts to curl. RGDS, Rick `63 SIIa 88'' (for sale) `65 SIIa 88'' `94 D-90 soft top `96 Disco SD `98 BMW Z-3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 11 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980824 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Russ Wilson <rwwilson@mho.net> Date: Sun, 23 Aug 1998 08:57:03 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: Diesel Dreams... >In a message dated 22/08/98 23:41:03 BST, you write: ><< leave this to the twisted souls doing a coiler conversions or a hybrid of > some sort. One can always dream.... >> >How about in a hopped up rolling chassis Russ??? :-)> The thought never even crossed my mind...;) Russ Wilson Leslie Bittner "That's just my opinion; I could be wrong...." Dennis Miller - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 12 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980824 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Jeremy Bartlett <bartlett@slip.net> Date: Sun, 23 Aug 1998 09:37:38 -0700 Subject: Re: Brake lines. Is thread tape kosher/ Wolfe, Charles wrote: > I replaced all my brake lines and during bleeding I found that my brake > line connection to the rear right brake cylinder is leaking. I > disconnected and reconnected and it does not appear to be cross > threaded. Is pipe thread tape exceptable? I suppose it would be acceptable from reaction with fluid perspective... but I would take exception (exceptable :) ) I'd be very hesistant about hiding a symptom of an underlying problem on the brake system. Just my opinion Jeremy - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 13 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980824 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Clayton Kirkwood" <kirkwood@garlic.com> Date: Sun, 23 Aug 1998 09:38:19 -0700 Subject: RE: 1959 SII distributor timing q's, please help Clayton Kirkwood wrote: > Out once again on the truck doing this and that. I proceeded to set the > timing and handcranked the engin over to where the TDC, 3*, and 6* markings [ truncated by lro-lite (was 24 lines)] > get good acceleration). Do I have the advance off? I just don't understand > why the rotor appears to be starting contact with plug 2 and not plug 1!!!! Remember the Distributor turns counterclockwise. your plug wires are in the right place. Now bearing in mind that the motion is counterclockwise are you sure that the rotor is not nearing number 1 ? John and Muddy As far as it appears to me!! When the flywheel marking is at 6* the rotor is pointing straight down with the leading metal flange just about where the #2 wire would be. #1 wire is still up at around 2 o'clock. I even went so far as to put the #1 wire down at the 5 o'clock position and reposition the other wires after that to fire in the correct 1, 3, 4, 2 order. No firing and strange cranking. The only two things that come to mind are that that come to mind are that the distributor is in wrong (out by 90 degrees) or that the rotor wasn't fully down when I set the timing and therefore got an incorrect reading of where the rotor was. The engine runs acceptably when these wires are in the "correct" listed order. I also had the original cap around and the po had scratched the number of lines in the wire stepup for the correct plug. This suggests that #2 is firing when the #2 piston is completing its power stroke. I definitely don't understand something simple here!!!!!!! Thanks, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 14 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980824 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
[spamkill: @[0-9][0-9]* input: %s] Received: from nathan.enteract.com (dscheidt@207.229.143.6) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 15 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980824 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: SPYDERS@aol.com Date: Sun, 23 Aug 1998 13:52:42 EDT Subject: Re: 80 psi, what the... In a message dated 8/23/98 10:06:24 AM, you wrote: <<The tire (like the Trac Edge) is rated at a max press of 80psi, but I always figured that this was just for heavy pickup loads or something. The guys mounting the tires, though, said they wouldn't run them below 65-70 psi, even with the radial tubes I had mounted. Surely this isn't right.>> I've got 245/75R16 Trac Edges on my 110. They were mounted with Michelin Radial Tubes and balanced, etc. at 80 psi. I was then returned the truck with 70 # in each tire. I thought that was way too much, but didn't know the tires were "Load Range *E*", rated up to 80#/tire. I told the Michelin Dealer who mounted them that LR suggested 28/38 or something like that for tyres on the 110. He laughed and told me to try it, and I did. The truck rode like with the OEM tires, (nice & comfy) except it steered a little vaguer, and I thought it was bordering on dangerous cornering on freeway offramps. The next day I went offroading in a forest in N. FL and pinched the two front tubes. I put in my spares and re-inflated the whole set to 60#/tire. I've been running them at that, or close to it since. Contrary to 99% of public opinion, I did not air down at all for offroading at Greek Peak. I took my truck up the hill and through all the courses with 60# of air in the tires, and for some sections, up to four people in the truck (during marshalling and setting-up the courses). The tires worked *as well for me as anyone else's did for them*, IMHO. We all saw tricked out trucks get stuck, even with 25#s in their mud terrains; while others too lazy to air down (me) and too cheap to spend for mud terrains (you go nameless) got through ok. I'll bet I wasn't the only one to turn up and leave their tires alone... Unless I'm in rock terrain with ledges and such to contend with and a need for acres of contact patch, I don't think I'll be taking too much air out of my tires. The skinny, tall shape of these things I'd rather keep, than air down and have them go all over the place. On the other hand if I had tires designed for flotation, I'd air them down and try like hell to float. I just drove 5500+ miles this past month, and with rotations every 2000 miles, I have not noticed abnormal wear yet. I did notice at GP that the people with 235/85R16 Trac Edges can't run them at anywhere near 80#. That size isn't rated for it. What may be harsh on you is the ride at high pressure, as I'm sure the coils treat me a little better, even at 60#s. --pat. 93 "rolling on rocks" 110 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 16 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980824 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Frankelson@aol.com Date: Sun, 23 Aug 1998 13:59:11 EDT Subject: Re: Brake lines. Is thread tape kosher/[multipart mime alternative 5 lines de In a message dated 23/08/98 01:01:15 BST, you write: << Unlike Frank, I have never used PTFE on the brakes - but on the heater valve and temp. sensor - that's another question! >> Adrian, I don't mind you taking a different view - just so long as you are there!!!!!!! Best Cheers Frank +--+--+--+ I !__| [_]|_\___ I ____|”_|"__|_ | / B791 PKV - Bronze Green 110 "(o)======(o)" - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 17 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980824 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Frankelson@aol.com Date: Sun, 23 Aug 1998 14:29:02 EDT Subject: Re: 80 psi, what the... In a message dated 23/08/98 16:32:45 BST, you write: > the radial tubes I had mounted. Surely this isn't right. What pressure do > you run in your Trac-Edges and similar? Thanks, >> They have to be kidding!!! With my General Grabbers on Disco steels I run 37lbs all round on my 110 which is loaded (roll cage, winch, tools, recovery gear etc).Go up to 46 on the rear when towing my caravan which is perfect then, but if I forget to drop 'em when the 'van is off the roadholding at rear is rubbish. 65lbs and you wouldn't get round the first bend in the rain - and probably not in the dry either. Best Cheers Frank +--+--+--+ I !__| [_]|_\___ I ____|”_|"__|_ | / B791 PKV - Bronze Green 110 "(o)======(o)" - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 18 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980824 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Frankelson@aol.com Date: Sun, 23 Aug 1998 14:29:20 EDT Subject: Re: 80 psi, what the... In a message dated 23/08/98 18:53:56 BST, you write: << I put in my spares and re-inflated the whole set to 60#/tire. I've been running them at that, or close to it since. Contrary to 99% of public opinion, I did not air down at all for offroading at Greek Peak. I took my truck up the hill and through all the courses with 60# of air in the tires, and for some sections, up to four people in the truck (during marshalling and setting-up the courses). The tires worked *as well for me as anyone else's did for them*, IMHO. We all saw tricked out trucks get stuck, even with 25#s in their mud terrains; while others too lazy to air down (me) and too cheap to spend f >> Two points if I may gentlemen. 1. Tyres heat up, and the air inside expands. The MAX pressure has nothing at all to do with what pressure you run the vehicle on under normal motoring- it's just a safety figure for when you're overloaded and to stop the tyre going BANG. however, running a tyre ten lbs below maximum pressure means that you could reach that on a long highway journey, then it would go BANG..... 2. Pat's laziness. Been there, done that got the tshirt filthy in deep English mud....but often (enough for comparisons) got through when I would expect to have aired down. Then spoke to a geezer from Yokohama Tyres who said that their research has shown that harder tyres throw the mud out of the treads better than aired down. So you're getting the same result for different reasons: aired down equals better flotation but treads fill up hence slicks and less grip. Hard tyres equals less flotation but treads selfclean hence better grip. Me I take the lazy option and never air down until I'm stuck (therefore the dirty tshirt) Best Cheers Frank +--+--+--+ I !__| [_]|_\___ I ____|”_|"__|_ | / B791 PKV - Bronze Green 110 "(o)======(o)" - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 19 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980824 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Frankelson@aol.com Date: Sun, 23 Aug 1998 14:29:01 EDT Subject: Re: 80 psi, what the... In a message dated 23/08/98 16:32:45 BST, you write: > the radial tubes I had mounted. Surely this isn't right. What pressure do > you run in your Trac-Edges and similar? Thanks, >> They have to be kidding!!! With my General Grabbers on Disco steels I run 37lbs all round on my 110 which is loaded (roll cage, winch, tools, recovery gear etc).Go up to 46 on the rear when towing my caravan which is perfect then, but if I forget to drop 'em when the 'van is off the roadholding at rear is rubbish. 65lbs and you wouldn't get round the first bend in the rain - and probably not in the dry either. Best Cheers Frank +--+--+--+ I !__| [_]|_\___ I ____|”_|"__|_ | / B791 PKV - Bronze Green 110 "(o)======(o)" - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 20 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980824 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: DONOHUEPE@aol.com Date: Sun, 23 Aug 1998 15:05:07 EDT Subject: More Power for a Land Rover! On Sat, 22 Aug 98 TeriAnn Wakeman wroteabout the 5.9L Diesel conversion: "I figure I could cut a day off the drive to Moab & do it more often. I also want to set a trailer up as a mobil film processing lab. I would like to be able to pull it." Aha! The trailer is the answer to your dreams. Install in the trailer, facing forward, a big honking Deetroit V8 with a drive shaft going through the rear crossmember hole to connect to the back of the transfer case where the overdrive should be. There are a few minor details to be worked out about driveline, U-joints, slipjoints, etc. This simple and elegant solution will allow you the power to pass those pesly VW vans as well as those pokey 2.25 things, and this method is simpler and safer than the JATO and Allison V12 conversions. Think outside of the aluminum box. Paul Donohue 1965 Land Rover Dormobile (without power enhancement trailer) Denver - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 21 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980824 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Zaxcoinc@aol.com Date: Sun, 23 Aug 1998 15:52:59 EDT Subject: Re: Brake lines. Is thread tape kosher/ That would be a negative. Pipe threads are tapered and crush to fit. Brake lines have a fit to bottom which the fitting crushes a flange at the bottom. Pipe dope or tape will come out when you wnat it most. Zack Arbios - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 22 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980824 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Zaxcoinc@aol.com Date: Sun, 23 Aug 1998 15:59:06 EDT Subject: Re: Diesel Dreams... In 1980 or so the kid down the block put a cat V8 diesel into his 4wd chevy, at idle it would allow a drop into Fourth gear with driver maintained hard pressure on the brakes and roll away with the brakes on and squealing without changing idle speed. Now that is power. He was using it to tow large boats to Tahoe from Sacramento. He took it out later, couldn;t keep the rest of the rig together. Too much for a Series, so sad. Zack Arbios - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 23 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980824 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
[digester: Removing section of: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------235686B76985D6E9894C0C28" ] From: Thomas Spoto <tspoto@az.com> Date: Sun, 23 Aug 1998 14:49:10 -0700 Subject: Re: Brake lines. Is thread tape kosher/ Pipe tape is normally wrapped onto the threads. The threads in this application are not the sealing system, but as has been mentioned already the tube flare to wheel cylinder interface is. If the wheel cylinder to tube are not sealing, you can wrap the threads in tape and the brake fluid will run out between the tube and the nut. I'd find out why the flare leaks. Two months ago I replaced the brake lines on a 109. The brake lines provided by the owner who bought them locally had the wrong nut on the end of the line. The threads were not long enough to bottom the tubing flare out in the wheel cylinder and allow it to seal. Maybe you have a similar problem. Tom [ Original post was HTML ] [digester: Removing section of: Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii ] [Attachment removed, was 23 lines.] - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 24 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980824 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: John Wood <jwood@solihullsociety.org> Date: Sun, 23 Aug 1998 16:37:03 -0600 Subject: Aug. 29th - 30th :Great Sand Dunes, CO All, Just wanted to be sure to invite all those able and wanting to the next Solihull Society outing: The Great Sand Dunes National Monument. Meeting in Colorado Springs at 9:00am on Saturday 29, August Also meeting in Bradford, off HWY 69 west of I-25 at 12:00noon Continue to Medano Pass and over into Great Sand Dunes. We will camp for the night at the dunes and look to do some driving both on and around the dunes. All are invited. If you have questions please contact John Wood at 303/774-9225 or jwrover@colo-net.com Yours' John Wood Event Co- Solihull Society - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 25 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980824 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Wolfe, Charles" <CWolfe@smdc.org> Date: Sun, 23 Aug 1998 17:51:06 -0500 Subject: brake lines continued I went out to the shop and removed and refitted the right rear brake line from the brake cylinder. All mating surfaces appeared good. Threads well. I retighted. When systme was pressurized, it leaks. Not from the threads but rather between the line and the coupleing nut!!. I don't like this. So what would you do? Is there a simple fix. Should I get another line? Is it likely to be the mateing surface of the cylinder? Please advise! Cwolfe - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 26 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980824 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: David Scheidt <david@infocom.com> Date: Sun, 23 Aug 1998 18:19:30 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: brake lines continued > I retighted. When systme was pressurized, it leaks. Not from the > threads but rather between the line and the coupleing nut!!. I don't > like this. This is likely a mismatch between the end of the brake line and the mating surface in the wheel cylinder. I don't know what sort you should have, but I'll bet it is the same on the other side. It is also possible that you don't have enough threads on the swivel nut. David - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 27 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980824 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
[digester: Removing section of: Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------BD295333F93CB7DBD21D9AB9" ] From: Adrian Redmond <channel6@post2.tele.dk> Date: Tue, 25 Aug 1998 01:23:57 +0200 Subject: Re: Brake lines. Is thread tape kosher/[multipart mime alternative 5 lines de Frankelson@aol.com wrote: Adrian, I don't mind you taking a different view - just so long as you are there!!!!!!! Hi Frank - (and all) Yep - I'm still there - just getting over my post-greenland-landy-trauma. When I wrote last, I had just returned from a mind-blowing three weeks in the Arctic, having covered the Inuit Circumpolar Conference for Alaska Public Radio Network. I had native politics on my mind as well as the many challenges which I face at the moment - how to keep my company running for the coming year when i will be working away a lot in Alaska. Three weeks of intense human issues, combined with utter arctic tranquility when dissapearing up the fjord, where a land rover is as good as a glass eye, had rendered all things european totally useless. The Arctic has this effect on people. It has for me for the past 13 years - all that space and air, the problems of back-home seem both irrelevant and a waste of time. I got a pile of replies to my mail - Dixon, Bill Adams, Frank, to name but a few managed to put things in some form of perspective. Ned Heite, with his quaker economy of words summed it all up - "Patience". It was heartwarming to hear that I'm not alone with these very unroverly feelings! My 88 is running fine after the mammoth rebuild - the drivers window jumps out (in) when you slam the door because the latch doesn't line up. The gearbox pops out of 4th with a will of it's own, but she drives like a rocket (ok - a deisel rocket). She doesn't smoke too much, there still isn't a spot of oil under the hood after over 1300 kilometeres since the rebuild (yep - I did fill oil in the motor, and it has stayed there), and the lights are still working. What have I to complain about? Well the seat belt lock doesn't, and the lack of door seals which were not on stock at the time let's a smidgeon of water in. But it seems that the rebuild was worth it. The 109" star5ts, runs, smokes a little, but does not seem the worse for wear considering that the lid has been opened about three times this year. It seems a case of "if it works, don't repair it". Having just changes a complete firewall on the 88, I am all to aware of the fun which awaits on the 109. the same is true for the axles and swivel balls - when you actually have one which is in perfect condition, you start to notice the drips and rusty bits on the other. That was actually the point of my spare axle thread before the holidays. I want to have these cars in tip-top nick, but I don't fancy a mammoth frame-up every year, or having a dismantled rover clutter up my studio for six months at a time. So I will probably find a couple of spare axles (I am already on the trail of a salisbury) which i can rebuild at leisure, then change quickly, then rebuild the old ones when i feel like it. I have the idea that having such parts on the shelf will take some of the trauma out of rovering. My other 88" is still in mothballs. But she's clean as a whistle, needs a little work on the engine and the brakes, including an update to the later series III servo, and I have space to let her stand in the workshop - so she will wait for another summer. (perhaps 2000) All in all, I guess that my rovers are worth the pain, and the cost of having them is far less than the cost of tin boxes of the other ilk. But it's been a heavy year. The good part is, that if our household manage to avoid rolling a wagon over, we probably won't have to use big bucks on the 88 for about 5 years. So yes, I'm alive and kickin, lurkin' away in some corner of the list, but still to occupied to make my presence felt... Enjoy the break guys... Adrian Redmond CHANNEL 6 TELEVISION DENMARK (Adrian Redmond) Foerlevvej 6 Mesing DK-8660 Skanderborg Denmark telephone (office) +45 86 57 22 66 telephone (home) +45 86 57 22 64 telefacsimile / data +45 76 57 24 46 mobile GSM (EFP unit) +45 40 74 75 64 mobile GSM (admin) +45 40 50 22 66 mobile NMT +45 30 86 75 66 e-mail channel6@post2.tele.dk HoTMaiL (www.e-mail) channel6denmark@hotmail.com [Attachment removed, was 16 lines.] [Attachment removed, was 6 lines.] - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 28 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980824 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Scott Wilson <scott@scratchstudio.com> Date: Sun, 23 Aug 1998 20:51:46 +0100 Subject: Is everyone working on their brakes? Okay... sorry about more brake questions, but I'm not quite sure what to do now besides re-ajust my left front brake once a week. My brakes were originally pulling to the right, so I got down and set the adjuster so that they were even... This is proof that it's the simple things in life that make you happy... well, until they start fucking up again... So they start pulling again, and I get down, and what do you know, I have to really crank the adjuster bolt to get the shoes where they should be. So then I drove around again. Happy that my brakes aren't pulling, but wait... as I near the end of my sunday afternoon cruise of setting off car alarms, they are slighly pulling again, and I'll bet the more I drive, the more they pull... I could almost justify this as anything, except that as long as I get down there and adjust the brakes, then everything's fine for a few miles of stop and go, but after that, they seem to progressively pull more to the right... Any ideas? And while I'm here... Maybe I'm in the only place in the world that this could happen, but I can be working on my car on one block and meet the nicest people in the world... An old north african guy who barely spoke english, but was telling stories about how great these things were in the desert... He could have been telling me they saved his life one day for all I know, and an 11 year old boy who just wanted to hang out and hand me tools while I was working (at 11 he even knew what an old rover was)... and then I'm literally two blocks the other direction and a bunch of cocky teenagers are pointing and laughing as I work on the truck... yeah... fuck them, I know, but it just pisses me off... but I'm easily pissed off at the moment... my first REAL web site goes live in a week, and I'm about to go crazy... Thank god I have something that I can go work on that has about as many transistors as I can count on one hand. well... thanks for letting me vent... -Scott 1973 SIII 88" - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 29 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980824 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "The Stockdales" <mstockdale@mho.net> Date: Sun, 23 Aug 1998 19:10:00 -0600 Subject: Congrats To Wes Wes; fantastic job, and a great day in the Burgh. I figure that the trip down the alley was to the left? Now that its running, when are you and the SO making it to the Rockies? We're waiting. I'm so happy for you that IM gonna get another martini right now. Send pics ASAP Mitch and the Red Dinosaur - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 30 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980824 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Philip and Aimee Houser <pahouser@fidnet.com> Date: Sun, 23 Aug 1998 14:28:33 -0500 Subject: Re: 5.9 L Cummings diesel Does anyone know anything about this engine?? I wonder how big it is compaired to a Chevy 6 cyl petrol and if it would fit into a series LR. ANyone know enough about this engine to speculate?????? ~~~~ Don't know enough to speculate on the fit in a LR, but it is a fine engine. Been around for a while and in my opinion its the best small diesel available in a new vehicle (small meaning less than 10L). Quite a lot of those dodge trucks have done over-the-road type service, with 100,000 miles a year with GVW as much as 15 short tons. Pretty rough service, and they do well! Cummins has a web site, but I don't remember the URL for sure.(www.cummins.com?) If it fits, I think it would be a worthy modification!! - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 31 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980824 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Zaxcoinc@aol.com Date: Sun, 23 Aug 1998 23:27:07 EDT Subject: Re: brake lines continued Could be either a bad flare on the end of your tubing, or a bad seat on the end of the tapped hole into the cylinder. If the end of either isn't good, the leak you describe will occur. Predictably, the brakes won't happen either. perhaps a mirror on a stick will allow you to view before you remove for inspection. But then perhaps access to a different brake line for testing purposes is easy for you Zack Arbios - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 32 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980824 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Rick Grant <rgrant@cadvision.com> Date: Sun, 23 Aug 1998 21:57:06 -0600 Subject: Re: brake lines continued At 05:51 PM 23/08/98 -0500, Wolfe, Charles, wrote >I retighted. When systme was pressurized, it leaks. Not from the >threads but rather between the line and the coupleing nut!! This drove me nuts for a day until I just sat down and thought out how the flared end, the nut, and the cylinder had to work. It turned out that the flared end was not meeting, or mating, with the brake cylinder connection at exactly the right angle. There was also a bit of roughness on the back of the flared end that probably didn't help. After carefully lining up the mating angles and polishing the back end as well as the front end of the flare I was finally able to achieve a leakless connection. (by the way, I too also use sealing tape on bleed nuts + a whole bunch more stuff) Rick Grant 1959, SII "VORIZO" rgrant@cadvision.com www.cadvision.com/rgrant Cobra Media Communications. Calgary, Canada Aboriginal and International Relief Issues - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 33 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980824 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Rick Grant <rgrant@cadvision.com> Date: Sun, 23 Aug 1998 21:57:05 -0600 Subject: Re: Is everyone working on their brakes? At 08:51 PM 23/08/98 +0100, Scott Wilson, wrote >down there and adjust the brakes, then everything's fine for a few miles >of stop and go, but after that, they seem to progressively pull more >to the right... Any ideas? I had a similar problem and I thought that the answer was new adjusters. I ordered a full set but before they arrived I decided to just run a triangular file down the valleys of the serations of the adjuster cams to provide more bite for the brake lining post. That did the trick; no more progressively screwed up brakes. I think that there must be a fair bit of vibration between the brake lining post and the adjuster cam, so much so that after a while the cam gets worn down and the thing gradually starts to un-adjust itself. I would imagine that weakened return springs would make the problem manifest itself rather quickly. Rick Grant 1959, SII "VORIZO" rgrant@cadvision.com www.cadvision.com/rgrant Cobra Media Communications. Calgary, Canada Aboriginal and International Relief Issues - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 34 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980824 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: PDoncaster@aol.com Date: Mon, 24 Aug 1998 00:00:35 EDT Subject: Jumping out of Fourth Gear, SIIa Hi everyone, I'm having a problem with the transmission on my '64 IIa 88" Does anyone have an Idea what could be wrong? It all started about two weeks ago.... I was driving back up to Maine from Conn., it was the weekend after Greek Peak, I was on cruising on the highway and all of a sudden, the shifter jumps out of fourth gear. Then about five min. Later, it does it again, and keeps on about every five to ten minutes. Soon, it became somewhat predictable, always just before the crest of a hill. Sometimes, however, again just after the crest, on the down slope. I tried holding it in gear, figuring the detent spring had gone, but to my horror, I felt it pop out of gear with some force. I tried resisting the force and holding it in gear, but that caused it to feel as though it was skipping a tooth, and then it tried too jump out of gear again, so I let it. Well, friends, it was a sunny Saturday morning, so I pulled in to a rest stop and called RN. Lanny gave me some theories and off I went to go open the inspection covers. All this was complicated because I had two passengers who were uninitiated into the world of Vintage Land Rovers. Unfortunately, the inspection ports revealed nothing of the problem. What else to do? I decided that I would drive on to the next town. The problem kept happening, but it wasnt getting worse, so I decided to just go as far as I could before giving up, less distance to tow it anyway. As it turned out, we made it to Maine only a couple hours late. As far as I can tell, none of the other gears are effected, only 4th. Does anyone have an idea of what it could be? Should I try to fix the tranny, or just buy a rebuilt one and drop it in? Thanks in advance, Peter Doncaster '64 IIa 88" SW - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 35 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980824 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "drew squires" <drewteri@concentric.net> Date: Mon, 24 Aug 1998 01:46:04 -0400 Subject: Re: Leaving for 2 weeks Hi Everyone: Just a quick note to say I'm unsubscribing for a couple of weeks while I go to Alaska. Hope ya'll have as good a time as I will! See ya when I get back. Yours: Drew Squires 66 109 (Still Getting Dressed) drewteri@concentric.net - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 36 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980824 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "drew squires" <drewteri@concentric.net> Date: Mon, 24 Aug 1998 02:51:32 -0400 Subject: Re: unsubscribe unsubscribe - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 37 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980824 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "The Becketts" <hillman@bigpond.com> Date: Sun, 23 Aug 1998 20:20:56 +1000 Subject: Rust in Series III I'm looking at a Series III LWB SW. It seems pretty much clear of rust, especially in the bulkhead and chassis. In fact, I can't see any. But, there is rust in the sill area directly below the rear doors - i.e. the doors on the side, not the very rear door. I'm not sure what area one would call it but is it hard to cut this area out and repair it? I sold my last remaining Hillman yesterday and am looking at a replacement restoration vehicle. Regards, Ron Beckett Emu Plains, Australia '86 Range Rover 4.8L auto "The Last Aquila" check my web site at www.users.bigpond.com/hillman - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 38 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980824 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "The Becketts" <hillman@bigpond.com> Date: Sun, 23 Aug 1998 20:40:03 +1000 Subject: steering wheel removal Someone wrote: >Actually, an alcohol-based penetrant (castor oil and alcohol mixed, or the >like) might work better - Hmm, that's model aero engine fuel - 20% castor oil, 80% Menthanol. Assuming it doesn't have nitromethane in it. Ron - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 39 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980824 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
[spamkill: mailfaxsrv input: %s] Received: from mailfaxsrv.local.com (engine26p16.maltanet.net [194.158.36.175]) [spamkill: mailfaxsrv input: %s] Received: from TIME-MACHINE ([100.130.130.222]) by mailfaxsrv.local.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.1960.3) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 40 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980824 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
END OF * LIST DIGEST Input: messages 39 lines 0 [forwarded 115 whitespace 0] Output: lines 1223 [content 1048 forwarded 77 (cut 38) whitespace 0][ First Message | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980824 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Digest Messages Copyright 1990-1999 by the original poster or/and Empire Rover Owners Society, All rights reserved. Photos & text Copyright 1990-1999 Bill Caloccia, All rights reserved. Empire/LRO List of charges for Empire/LRO Policies
against the distribution of unsolicited commercial e-mail (aka SPAM).
|
![]() |
|||
<--Back |
HOME |
TOP |
Forward --> |
|