[ First Message Last | Table of Contents | <- Digest -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Sski3@aol.com Date: Sat, 22 Aug 1998 10:56:21 EDT Subject: Clayton Cunniff <clayton@worldpat Looking for the correct address for Clayton, anyone? Steve F 69 SIIA 88 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 2 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980823 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: TeriAnn Wakeman <twakeman@cruzers.com> Date: Sat, 22 Aug 98 08:28:34 -0700 Subject: 5.9 L Cummings diesel I saw an intersting add the other day that left me speculating. It seems thet Dodge is offering a 5.6L inline six cylinder Cummings diesel. It evidently comes in 160, 180 and 215HP versions. I noticed that the intake seems to be on the left and the exhaust on the right side of the engine (good for left hand drive cars) Does anyone know anything about this engine?? I wonder how big it is compaired to a Chevy 6 cyl petrol and if it would fit into a series LR. ANyone know enough about this engine to speculate?????? TeriAnn Wakeman If you send me direct mail, please Santa Cruz, California start the subject line with TW - twakeman@cruzers.com I will be sure to read the message http://www.cruzers.com/~twakeman "How can life grant us the boon of living..unless we dare" Amelia Earhart 1898-1937 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 3 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980823 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: jimfoo@uswest.net Date: Sat, 22 Aug 1998 10:21:40 -0700 Subject: Re: jarvis in watertown ny Try jarvis64@aol.com. Bill rice is the one you want. DHW4U@aol.com wrote: > Looking for JARVIS or somthing like it from list > please e-mail dhw4u@aol.com Jim Hall Elephant Chaser 1966 88" - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 4 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980823 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Kirk Hillman <khillman@rttinc.com> Date: Sat, 22 Aug 1998 11:14:15 -0700 Subject: Tach and Clunk Thanks to everyone that has given their opinion on my problems. To update everyone, the tach seems to work fine ever since. (BTW, '66 SIIa with ~3" SMITHS tach) I haven't yet opened up the diff or done any other analysis that might lead to the explanation. To be honest I am a little frightened to do it. I don't think, I REALLY don't think that it is a bushing in the suspension. The jolt is forward and reverse. That leads me to believe drive train (although I am inexperienced). I will probably open it up this weekend. I really don't want to find a sheared tooth, so I most likely will. Is it possible that I sheered a half shaft spline? I just thought that it -might- explain the one directional symptom, or one of the 'side' gears? I wish I could just pull it apart, find the problem and have the parts to repair it immediately. I am planning on a day trip next week with a friend to go 'fishing'. I don't know if we are going to take rods or not, but we plan on finding some remote little water hole in the mountains. I think I will build up to the experience, I'll go change the plugs and try to fiddle with the dwell. Speaking of dwell, doing the previously mentioned technique with roughly pointing at #1, what angle would that achieve? I am told 52 degrees is what I am looking for. Any other way to accurately set the angle without the special tool? Thanks all for the indulgence. Regards, Kirk D. Hillman PS- I still haven't decided on a name for my SIIa, ideas? - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 5 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980823 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "David Schwartz" <dschwartz@extremezone.com> Date: Sat, 22 Aug 1998 10:36:49 -0700 Subject: Newbie Question for the experts... Hello all, My wife and I are considering a Discovery for our first Rover. We are looking to pick up one that is a little used (96 or newer). My question is this, excluding 1995 models and earlier (I've been told these had a number of engine problems), how is the maintenence and reliability of the 1996 and newer Discos? I'm just trying to get some feedback from the folks that have (or have had) them. I would greatly appreciate any info you could provide. David & Lynn Schwartz dschwartz@extremezone.com - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 6 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980823 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Vince Sabio <vince@humournet.com> Date: Sat, 22 Aug 1998 13:55:08 -0400 Subject: Re: Newbie Question for the experts... ** Sometime around 13:36 -0400 8/22/98, David Schwartz said: >Hello all, >My wife and I are considering a Discovery for our first Rover. We are >looking to pick up one that is a little used (96 or newer). >My question is this, excluding 1995 models and earlier (I've been told these >had a number of engine problems), how is the maintenence and reliability of >the 1996 and newer Discos? [ truncated by list-digester (was 11 lines)] >I'm just trying to get some feedback from the folks that have (or have had) >them. I would greatly appreciate any info you could provide. [] David, let me share a little something with you and your wife (get your mind out of the gutter, Frank, I wasn't referring to that): If you plan to buy ANY kind of vehicle ever again for the rest of your lives, do not join a mailing list devoted to discussion of that specific vehicle and ask for feedback on reliability, etc. The only reason any of us ever joins these lists is to complain. :-) With that said (and no, I wasn't entirely serious), I can attest to the fact that the Discovery is an absolutely wonderful vehicle with an impeccable maintenance record -- including *no* unexpected repairs -- for the first 6,000 miles (9.600 km), which is as far as I've driven mine in the two months I've owned it. <g> Here's to hoping that the rest of the responses are more helpful than this one ... - Vince Sabio Columbia MD 98 Disco LSE (Willow) Original owner! No leaks (yet)! No rattles (yet)! Still can't get that darned oil drain plug off (yet)! - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 7 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980823 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Scott Wilson <scott@scratchstudio.com> Date: Sat, 22 Aug 1998 14:37:16 +0100 Subject: RE: Newbie Question for the experts... > No leaks (yet)! > Still can't get that darned oil drain plug off (yet)! There's your problem... as soon as that drain plug comes off, the oil will start pouring out of every oraface in the car... they to that to be sure they don't start leaking until they're bought! -Scott - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 8 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980823 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Russ Wilson <rwwilson@mho.net> Date: Sat, 22 Aug 1998 12:14:32 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: 5.9 L Cummings diesel >I saw an intersting add the other day that left me speculating. It seems >thet Dodge is offering a 5.6L inline six cylinder Cummings diesel. It >evidently comes in 160, 180 and 215HP versions. Why not look into a GM 6.2 or 6.5. Samari Conversions in England makes kits for them and here in the states you can go to any junkyard and pick up an old 6.2 out of a rusted out old chevy or suburban. Russ Wilson Leslie Bittner "That's just my opinion; I could be wrong...." Dennis Miller - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 9 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980823 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: GElam30092@aol.com Date: Sat, 22 Aug 1998 15:46:29 EDT Subject: RE 5.9L Cummins Diesel/ Dodge You can read about it at http://www.cummins.com/ram/tdiesel.html At 460 ft-lbs of torque, can you say "snap, crackle and pop"? It'd be a hell of an engine in a Series but if seems extremely complicated with all of the engine management systems. Later.... Gerry Elam PHX AZ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 10 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980823 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: TeriAnn Wakeman <twakeman@cruzers.com> Date: Sat, 22 Aug 98 13:04:20 -0700 Subject: Re: RE 5.9L Cummins Diesel/ Dodge >You can read about it at http://www.cummins.com/ram/tdiesel.html ; ;>At 460 ft-lbs of torque, can you say "snap, crackle and pop"? I can say Salisbury rear and Non-Rover transmission. A problems is that any newish diesel in the US will have lots of complicated stuff to keep emissions down. I was amazed looking at the 4 cyl Suzuki diesels. TeriAnn Wakeman If you send me direct mail, please Santa Cruz, California start the subject line with TW - twakeman@cruzers.com I will be sure to read the message http://www.cruzers.com/~twakeman Walk in harmony with the earth and all her creatures and you will create beauty wherever you go. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 11 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980823 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Frankelson@aol.com Date: Sat, 22 Aug 1998 16:26:44 EDT Subject: double trouble?? Sorry folks, no LR content (except I can see mine out of the office window) but are you getting two of this posting?? My flash session is sending two of the first post each time, but only one is showing up when I get the list... Best Cheers Frank +--+--+--+ I !__| [_]|_\___ I ____|”_|"__|_ | / B791 PKV - Bronze Green 110 "(o)======(o)" - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 12 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980823 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Frankelson@aol.com Date: Sat, 22 Aug 1998 16:26:44 EDT Subject: double trouble?? Sorry folks, no LR content (except I can see mine out of the office window) but are you getting two of this posting?? My flash session is sending two of the first post each time, but only one is showing up when I get the list... Best Cheers Frank +--+--+--+ I !__| [_]|_\___ I ____|”_|"__|_ | / B791 PKV - Bronze Green 110 "(o)======(o)" - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 13 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980823 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Wolfe, Charles" <CWolfe@smdc.org> Date: Sat, 22 Aug 1998 15:37:55 -0500 Subject: Brake lines. Is thread tape kosher/ I replaced all my brake lines and during bleeding I found that my brake line connection to the rear right brake cylinder is leaking. I disconnected and reconnected and it does not appear to be cross threaded. Is pipe thread tape exceptable? Cwolfe - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 14 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980823 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Frankelson@aol.com Date: Sat, 22 Aug 1998 17:13:07 EDT Subject: Re: Brake lines. Is thread tape kosher/ In a message dated 22/08/98 21:42:53 BST, you write: << Is pipe thread tape exceptable? >> yep, use it all the time.. Best Cheers Frank +--+--+--+ I !__| [_]|_\___ I ____|”_|"__|_ | / B791 PKV - Bronze Green 110 "(o)======(o)" - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 15 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980823 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: john cranfield <john.cranfield@ns.sympatico.ca> Date: Sat, 22 Aug 1998 18:44:51 -0300 Subject: Re: Brake lines. Is thread tape kosher/ Wolfe, Charles wrote: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 16 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980823 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: john cranfield <john.cranfield@ns.sympatico.ca> Date: Sat, 22 Aug 1998 18:51:29 -0300 Subject: Re: 5.9 L Cummings diesel TeriAnn Wakeman wrote: > I saw an intersting add the other day that left me speculating. It seems > thet Dodge is offering a 5.6L inline six cylinder Cummings diesel. It > evidently comes in 160, 180 and 215HP versions. > I noticed that the intake seems to be on the left and the exhaust on the > right side of the engine (good for left hand drive cars) > Does anyone know anything about this engine?? I wonder how big it is [ truncated by list-digester (was 12 lines)] > compaired to a Chevy 6 cyl petrol and if it would fit into a series LR. > ANyone know enough about this engine to speculate?????? This engine is huge. it fills the engine bay of a Dodge pickup entirely from front to back and so would be way too long for any LandRover. Having said that I feel this is a shame as it is a fine engine and would make teriffic swap for green Land Rovers. John and Muddy - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 17 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980823 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: SPYDERS@aol.com Date: Sat, 22 Aug 1998 18:38:40 EDT Subject: Re: 5.9 L Cummins diesel In a message dated 98-08-22 17:51:03 EDT, John or Muddy wrote: << This engine is huge. it fills the engine bay of a Dodge pickup entirely from front to back and so would be way too long for any LandRover. Having said that I feel this is a shame as it is a fine engine and would make teriffic swap for green Land Rovers. >> I saw the wwwsite that was previously posted, but couldn't find HxWxL or weight for the engine. John says too long for any LR, but if I had a 101FC, or even a SIIb 110FC, I'd hunt for the dimensions of this engine... It is one honkin' huge TDI! --pat. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 18 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980823 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Russ Wilson <rwwilson@mho.net> Date: Sat, 22 Aug 1998 15:40:12 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Diesel Dreams... Hmmmm people talking about the big 5.9L Cummings diesels got me thinking again about all of the twists and turns of doing an engine swap in a Series Rover. I mentioned the 6.2-6.5 GM Diesels in my last post but my thought is this; IF you're gonna go...GO BIG. Cat 6.9L anyone???? I saw one put into a custom pickup at a car show a few weeks ago. Just the sound of it sitting there at idle made the hair on my arms stand up. I'm thinking that it sure would be nice/interesting to shove that big yellow monster into a Series but I'm thinking that the problems with size as well as weight would leave this to the twisted souls doing a coiler conversions or a hybrid of some sort. One can always dream.... Russ Wilson Leslie Bittner "That's just my opinion; I could be wrong...." Dennis Miller - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 19 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980823 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Faye and Peter Ogilvie <ogilvi@hgea.org> Date: Sat, 22 Aug 1998 13:01:16 Subject: Re: Cummins diesel, a boat anchor to end all boat anchors. If size doesn't get you the weight surely would. Think I saw a weight on the cummins of over 900 pounds. Probably 400 pounds heavier than the 2.25l. Unless you have an overwhelming desire to tow the Queen Mary, one of the turbo charged 4 cylinder diesels like the Iveco would seem to be a better fit. The Aussies have used a 3.9L Nissan diesel as standard equipment, I think and may have been used as a factory engine in South Africa. Don't know if that engine is a six or a four cylinder. It would be one big four cylinder, however, so assume that some cutting would be necessary to make it fit. Also clearance for the front axle could be a problem. The real question is why after all these years, TeriAnn, are you looking for a big foot rover. Tired of getting passed by mopeds?? >I saw an intersting add the other day that left me speculating. It seems >thet Dodge is offering a 5.6L inline six cylinder Cummings diesel. It >evidently comes in 160, 180 and 215HP versions. >I noticed that the intake seems to be on the left and the exhaust on the >right side of the engine (good for left hand drive cars) >evidently comes in 160, 180 and 215HP versions. most efficient way to handle the intake/exhaust system. Common custom addition to many foreign engines was a cross flow head. aloha Peter - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 20 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980823 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Wesley Harris <wharris@midmon.com> Date: Sat, 22 Aug 1998 19:02:08 -0500 Subject: IT RUNS!!!!!! After 18 months of wrenching, drinking, swearing, mumbling and thinking, my as-yet un-named '64 88 moved under its own power today!! I went for a jaunt of about fifty meters down the alley and all seems well. Nothing exploded or burst into flame or fell off (give it time). I am positively euphoric, though this might be from petrol fumes. I just wanted to say "thanks, ya sods!" to all on the list for all the assistance and advice I've received this past year; another Series truck is on the road!!!! Ta, Wes Harris '64 88 SW, running, driving, leaking. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 21 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980823 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Russ Wilson <rwwilson@mho.net> Date: Sat, 22 Aug 1998 16:18:13 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: IT RUNS!!!!!! >After 18 months of wrenching, drinking, swearing, mumbling and thinking, my >as-yet un-named '64 88 moved under its own power today!! What he fails to mention is that all of the work was done under a tarp in the driveway... extra points for misery endured. A Big Congratulations from both of us...I know how hard you've been working. What does the new S.O. think of the now running Rover??? Maybe you can "Christen" the beast.... Russ Wilson Leslie Bittner "That's just my opinion; I could be wrong...." Dennis Miller - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 22 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980823 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: SPYDERS@aol.com Date: Sat, 22 Aug 1998 19:29:52 EDT Subject: Uses for that rear PTO hole Was fooling around with a mondo short circuit, some electrons and lots of volts recently, and a thought came to mind re: a use for the hole in rear x- member. Why not mount a Tesla Coil in there, and when someone approaches too close in their vehicle, ka-zzzap! A wild-ass spark issues forth onto their hood ornament, frying their running horse logo or whatever. oh well. weekend boredom resumes here. --pat. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 23 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980823 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Frankelson@aol.com Date: Sat, 22 Aug 1998 19:38:04 EDT Subject: Re: Diesel Dreams... In a message dated 22/08/98 23:41:03 BST, you write: << leave this to the twisted souls doing a coiler conversions or a hybrid of some sort. One can always dream.... >> How about in a hopped up rolling chassis Russ??? :-)> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 24 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980823 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Frankelson@aol.com Date: Sat, 22 Aug 1998 19:38:17 EDT Subject: Re: IT RUNS!!!!!! In a message dated 23/08/98 00:04:27 BST, you write: << another Series truck is on the road!!!! >> Rover on my son!!!! Best Cheers Frank +--+--+--+ I !__| [_]|_\___ I ____|”_|"__|_ | / B791 PKV - Bronze Green 110 "(o)======(o)" - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 25 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980823 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Frankelson@aol.com Date: Sat, 22 Aug 1998 19:38:04 EDT Subject: Re: Diesel Dreams... In a message dated 22/08/98 23:41:03 BST, you write: << leave this to the twisted souls doing a coiler conversions or a hybrid of some sort. One can always dream.... >> How about in a hopped up rolling chassis Russ??? :-)> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 26 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980823 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Frankelson@aol.com Date: Sat, 22 Aug 1998 19:38:17 EDT Subject: Re: Cummins diesel, a boat anchor to end all boat anchors. In a message dated 22/08/98 23:57:22 BST, you write: << turbo charged 4 cylinder diesels like the Iveco would seem to be a better fit. The Aussies have used a 3.9L Nissan diesel as standard equipment, I think >> My Iveco Turbo pulls to over 80mph - just wait for the intercooler!!! - the Aussies used an Isuzu 3-9 and I understand it is a lovely beast...... Best Cheers Frank +--+--+--+ I !__| [_]|_\___ I ____|”_|"__|_ | / B791 PKV - Bronze Green 110 "(o)======(o)" - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 27 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980823 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Frankelson@aol.com Date: Sat, 22 Aug 1998 19:40:29 EDT Subject: Re: Uses for that rear PTO hole In a message dated 23/08/98 00:30:29 BST, you write: << oh well. weekend boredom resumes here. >> but you can't have sold your Rover Pat??? Best Cheers Frank +--+--+--+ I !__| [_]|_\___ I ____|”_|"__|_ | / B791 PKV - Bronze Green 110 "(o)======(o)" - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 28 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980823 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Frankelson@aol.com Date: Sat, 22 Aug 1998 19:40:28 EDT Subject: Re: Uses for that rear PTO hole In a message dated 23/08/98 00:30:29 BST, you write: << oh well. weekend boredom resumes here. >> but you can't have sold your Rover Pat??? Best Cheers Frank +--+--+--+ I !__| [_]|_\___ I ____|”_|"__|_ | / B791 PKV - Bronze Green 110 "(o)======(o)" - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 29 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980823 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: SPYDERS@aol.com Date: Sat, 22 Aug 1998 19:53:37 EDT Subject: Re: Not sold, just put away for today. In a message dated 98-08-22 19:42:19 EDT, you write: << << oh well. weekend boredom resumes here. >> but you can't have sold your Rover Pat??? >> Never, Frank, never... It is parked for the weekend. I pried my a** out of the seat after a longish up-and-down the east coast trip this past four weeks, and am taking a vacation from being in it, under it and on top of it. Not sure if the impending storm will strike south florida, so I've ensconced it in a strong concrete structure, away from flying trees and vehicles... As well, I can't treat the locals to seeing the most beautifully-ugly vehicle on these streets *everyday*, can I? After a while, all the gawking pedestrians start looking a lot like RTV canes... just miss 'em by close enough not to get the points. (See, i did learn something at the ANARC meet. Thanks, Limey in Exile!) --pat. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 30 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980823 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: TeriAnn Wakeman <twakeman@cruzers.com> Date: Sat, 22 Aug 98 16:59:07 -0700 Subject: Re: Cummins diesel, a boat anchor to end all boat anchors. > The real question is why after all these years, TeriAnn, are you looking >for a big foot rover. Tired of getting passed by mopeds?? ; Its them pesky split window VW vans passing me uphill! I figure I could cut a day off the drive to Moab & do it more often. I also want to set a trailer up as a mobil film processing lab. I would like to be able to pull it. TeriAnn Wakeman If you send me direct mail, please Santa Cruz, California start the subject line with TW - twakeman@cruzers.com I will be sure to read the message http://www.cruzers.com/~twakeman "How can life grant us the boon of living..unless we dare" Amelia Earhart 1898-1937 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 31 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980823 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
[digester: Removing section of: Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------ACD37B00AFBDCE5FE19C6AD9" ] From: Adrian Redmond <channel6@post2.tele.dk> Date: Mon, 24 Aug 1998 02:00:21 +0200 Subject: Re: Brake lines. Is thread tape kosher/ Whilst I am sure that PTFE tape works, I am not sure that it's entirely kosher -because if the gland leaks without PTFE tape, then the pipe end isn't sitting correctly in the gland housing. I presume we're talking copper brake lines? Copper is a soft metal, the cylinder gland components are harder - the theory is that the gland collar (the part on the pipe) should sueeze the properly mated pipe end into the gland housing. If all parts are clean (and correctly matched - which judging by the fact that your other three wheels do not leak seems to indicate correctly matched lines and glands/cylinders - then it must not leak - if it does, then it means that the system is not hydraulically sealed - given the pressures involved under braking, I would prefer that the pipe system was taking the load rather than PTFE tape. Just look at a PTFE sealed gland when you disassemble it, to see how often the tightening process has stripped all but a sidgeon of PTFE from the thread. I'd check that the glands are really tight - using a proper gland spanner will help. Unlike Frank, I have never used PTFE on the brakes - but on the heater valve and temp. sensor - that's another question! Good luck. Adrian Redmond CHANNEL 6 TELEVISION DENMARK (Adrian Redmond) Foerlevvej 6 Mesing DK-8660 Skanderborg Denmark telephone (office) +45 86 57 22 66 telephone (home) +45 86 57 22 64 telefacsimile / data +45 76 57 24 46 mobile GSM (EFP unit) +45 40 74 75 64 mobile GSM (admin) +45 40 50 22 66 mobile NMT +45 30 86 75 66 e-mail channel6@post2.tele.dk HoTMaiL (www.e-mail) channel6denmark@hotmail.com [Attachment removed, was 16 lines.] [Attachment removed, was 6 lines.] - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 32 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980823 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: john cranfield <john.cranfield@ns.sympatico.ca> Date: Sat, 22 Aug 1998 22:04:03 -0300 Subject: Re: Cummins diesel, a boat anchor to end all boat anchors. Frankelson@aol.com wrote: > In a message dated 22/08/98 23:57:22 BST, you write: > << turbo charged 4 cylinder diesels like the Iveco would seem to be a > better fit. The Aussies have used a 3.9L Nissan diesel as standard > equipment, I think >> > My Iveco Turbo pulls to over 80mph - just wait for the intercooler!!! - the > Aussies used an Isuzu 3-9 and I understand it is a lovely beast... I have a Tractor with an Isuzu. A really good engine with crap electrics but I fixed the alternator by swaping in a Lucas as the Japanese biult one only lasted 2.5 minutes after the warrantee ran out and would have cost $400 to fix or $700 to replace. The Lucas is now around 30 years old and going fine ( it was already 20 when put in the tractor.) John and Muddy - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 33 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980823 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Peter M. Kaskan" <pmk11@cornell.edu> Date: Sat, 22 Aug 1998 21:38:29 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Solex Adj. Hi Everybody - I followed the adjustment procedures in the blue book for adjusting my Solex. After a few months I pulled the plugs to find evidence of a rich mixture. How do I make the mixture less rich? Is it the 'needle screw' I turn - which way? BTW - I've got the smallest jets in there. Thanks - Peter Peter M. Kaskan Uris Hall 231 Office / 607-255-3382 Dept. Of Psychology Lab / 607-255-6396 Cornell University e-mail / pmk11@cornell.edu http://comp9.psych.cornell.edu/graduates/people/PeterM.Kaskan.htm http://comp9.psych.cornell.edu/psychology/finlay/finlaylab.html - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 34 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980823 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Clayton Kirkwood" <kirkwood@garlic.com> Date: Sat, 22 Aug 1998 21:17:33 -0700 Subject: 1959 SII distributor timing q's, please help Out once again on the truck doing this and that. I proceeded to set the timing and handcranked the engin over to where the TDC, 3*, and 6* markings were on the flywheel. The manual says to set to 6* which I did, and then connect a test light between the LT at the distributor and ground which I did. Looking at the engine from the right hand side of the truck, the rotor was basically towards 6 o'clock: this I would assume would be the start of firing for plug 1 as the rotor comes around to make contact with the inside post of the distributor. HOWEVER, that is the location for the contact to plug two. (dist cap position when properly fitted appears to be plug 2 at 4 o'clock, plug 1 at 1 o'clock, plug 3 at 10 o'clock, and plug 4 at 7 o'clock). This appears to be off, or I am missing something? The point I am trying to understand is: rotor is approaching the contact for plug 2 not plug one. The engine runs ok. The plugs are new but dry black (haynes suggest too rich a carb. And I get a bluish smoke out the tailpipe along with a lot of black sputtered oil droplets. I run 87 octane and this being an early SII is to be set at 6* BTDC. Could the distributor itself be several teeth off? (seems unlikely since I get good acceleration). Do I have the advance off? I just don't understand why the rotor appears to be starting contact with plug 2 and not plug 1!!!! Thanks in advance for any help... Clayton Kirkwood (916) 663-2368 kirkwood@garlic.com - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 35 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980823 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Clayton Kirkwood" <kirkwood@garlic.com> Date: Sat, 22 Aug 1998 21:39:54 -0700 Subject: 59 SII engine RPM questions After setting my timing (see previous posting and associated problems), I turned to trying to determine my RPMs in an attempt to set the Rochester idle mix. I broke down several months ago and picked up a Fluke 88 (one of the really nice Flukes which comes with an RPM inductive lead). I follow (I think :>) the instructions on getting an RPM reading: connect inductive lead around a plug wire, with specific side of pickup toward spark plug, set meter to RPM, set to type 2 (4cycle, non-DIS) and then start engine (at normal running temp). I do this and get readings in the 3000 range. I know enough to know that the engine is not turning over at no 3000 RPM. The diagram suggest that I should read the correct RPM. I try their various alternatives (non-resisitor plugs: move pickup back from plug; averaging; multispark type setting - apparently where the spark goes to both TDC pistons even though one is finishing exhaust stroke; etc). Nothing seems to work. No where in the manual where I read that I should divide the reading by the number of cylinders - doesn't really make sense to, but ... One thought is that because this is a positive ground system, something must need to change??? What am I missing here?? TIA, Clayton Kirkwood (916) 663-2368 kirkwood@garlic.com - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 36 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980823 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Clayton Kirkwood" <kirkwood@garlic.com> Date: Sat, 22 Aug 1998 21:48:47 -0700 Subject: rochester adjustments on 59 SII As you may have read severl other recent posts, I am trying to time and set carb for said vehicle. I have the rochester carb and no real info on how to properly set the mixture correctly. If I have the ignition set correctly, then the last step should be setting the carb correctly. I have bluish smoke all of the time and it sputters black droplets out the tail pipe and the 100 miles new plugs, I believe properly gapped, have a dry block suet all over them (not wet). The Haynes manual suggests this symptom is caused be overly rich carb setting. I believe I am running a 52 jet (possibly 51). I did a carb rebuild recently (new gaskets etc). The page which came with the kit doesn't adequately explain setting the carb up. Any pointers would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, Clayton Kirkwood (916) 663-2368 kirkwood@garlic.com - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 37 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980823 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "John McMaster" <john@chiaroscuro.co.uk> Date: Sun, 23 Aug 1998 09:46:05 +0100 Subject: RE: 5.9 L Cummings diesel Even if it fitted in a series (with Salisbury rear) how long do you think the running gear would last??? It is about 300-400lb/ft of torque - NO WAY!! You will trash everything in no time at all. Do not even think about it ;-) john - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 38 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980823 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
END OF * LIST DIGEST Input: messages 37 lines 0 [forwarded 71 whitespace 0] Output: lines 985 [content 807 forwarded 64 (cut 7) whitespace 0][ First Message | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980823 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Digest Messages Copyright 1990-1999 by the original poster or/and Empire Rover Owners Society, All rights reserved. Photos & text Copyright 1990-1999 Bill Caloccia, All rights reserved. Empire/LRO List of charges for Empire/LRO Policies
against the distribution of unsolicited commercial e-mail (aka SPAM).
|
![]() |
|||
<--Back |
HOME |
TOP |
Forward --> |
|