L-R Mailing Lists 1948-1998 Land Rover's 50th Anniversary

Land Rover Owner Message Digest Contents


[ First Message Last | Table of Contents | <- Digest -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]

The Land Rover Owner Daily Digest

Send Submissions Land-Rover-Owner@Land-Rover.Team.Net

msgSender linesSubject
1 "Clayton Kirkwood" [kirk9RE: Australian Shepherds
2 "C. Marin Faure" [faurec27Re: Throwing Out The Throwout Bearing
3 MRogers315@aol.com 70V8 Camshaft replaced
4 "Richard Clarke"[Richard28to re-core or not to re-core - that is the question
5 GElam30092@aol.com 25ANARC 50th at Greek Peak
6 "Richard Marsden" [rmars20little test


------------------------------ [ Message 1 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980803 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]

From: "Clayton Kirkwood" <kirkwood@garlic.com>
Date: Sun, 2 Aug 1998 07:04:22 -0700
Subject: RE: Australian Shepherds

Kelpie is an alternative name for the Australian Cattle Dog.

CrK

------------------------------
[ <- Message 2 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980803 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]

From: "C. Marin Faure" <faurecm@halcyon.com>
Date: Sun, 2 Aug 1998 11:20:08 -0700
Subject: Re: Throwing Out The Throwout Bearing

From: "bill.di" <bill.di@mci2000.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Jul 1998 18:18:48 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Throwing Out The Throwout Bearing

>Anyone ever replaced the clutch throwout bearing without complete removal of
the engine/transmission?

I've been out of the country on assignment for a week, so you may already
have an answer.  But my answer is yes, and I've done it.  You obviously
have to disconnect the transmission/transfer case unit (which means
disconnecting the fore and aft drivelines and parking brake linkage) and
sliding it back, but you can change the entire clutch in this manner
without having to remove any major components from the vehicle.

________________________
C. Marin Faure
  (original owner)
  1973 Land Rover Series III-88
  1991 Range Rover Vogue SE
   Seattle, WA

------------------------------
[ <- Message 3 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980803 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]

From: MRogers315@aol.com
Date: Sun, 2 Aug 1998 18:09:27 EDT
Subject: V8 Camshaft replaced

Well I have done it.
 
With a lot of help and advice from Chris and his team at RPI (I did the deed
myself but at his workshop) the hybrid now has a nice new 3.9 camshaft,
followers, oil pump, timing chain and gears.

The job took me a full nine hours. About a third was stripping down, a third
cleaning up, and a third re-building. Everything came apart with no trouble,
even removing the front pulley was easy with a trick the RPI boys showed me
using an old fanbelt. You put it around the main pulley and water pump pulley
allowing the slack to get caught back into the main pulley, this jams
everthing up allowing the bolt to be undone with a bloody great bar on a 3/4
drive socket. Once out the old cam showed tremendos wear with three lobes 50%
gone and most showing serious surface breakdown. All the followers were
dished. The timing chain had enough slack to allow the cam to turn 2 or 3
degrees out of sync from the mainshaft. Whilst the oil pump base was too badly
scored to be re-faced. 

Cleaning everything up took longer than expected even with a gunk tank
available. Paint stripper is RPIs favorite weapon in removing all the tar from
the inside of the timing case and a very good job it does (my level of
acceptable exterior engine part cleanlines was far below that expected at RPI
but I could see no point in polishing up the alli casings only to get them
covered in crap next time out) The oil pump chambers in the front casing
required a lot of carefull smoothing before the new rotors would rotate
smoothly.

Re-assembly was straightforward with a lot of help from Holly, Chris's engine
builder. Basicly Holly would set me one task at a time only stepping in to
stop me going ahead too far in the wrong area, like attempting to re-fitt
fiddly bits around the carbs before the rocker covers were on (might drop bits
down inside the engine, wrists firmly slapped).

The only problem encountered was discovering that the base of the radiator had
rusted away and fell apart when I removed it. A good second hand rad was soon
found from the graveyard behind the workshop.

Once everthing was put back together and filled with liquids the engine
started straight away, but sounded like a bag of nuts. I switched off straight
away thinking something was very wrong, only to be told by Holly that this was
quite normal untill the new cam followers pumped up with oil. Once re-started
and run at about 1000 RPM for a few minites things started to quieten down
untill eventually the engine was the quietest I have ever known it.

Out onto the road (having been told that camshafts do not require running in)
it was time to see what difference a hard days work had made. Well it seems to
go a little quicker, it certainly revs higher without complaining, the
acceleration is noticably faster. On a piece of road I have used for years to
judge vehicle improvements the acceleration from standing test between two
fixed points achived 5 MPH more than the hybrid has managed before. Chris
insists that I will not see any real improvements without re-jetting the carbs
to suite the new cam, but I am well pleased, and look forward to improved fuel
consumption as well.

And the costs (all in UK pounds) 
Camshaft 3.9 EFi O/E Rover, 45.00
Tappetts 39.00 a set.
Timing chain set 28.00
Oil pump base 42.00
(all supplied by RPI of course)

Mike Rogers
Lightweight/Range Rover hybrid
+ Rolling RR chassis (awaiting the right body)

------------------------------
[ <- Message 4 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980803 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]

From: "Richard Clarke"<Richard.Clarke@nre.vic.gov.au>
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 1998 10:48:38 +1000
Subject: to re-core or not to re-core - that is the question

From: "Wolfe, Charles" <CWolfe@smdc.org>
Date: Sat, 1 Aug 1998 11:09:03 -0500
Subject: Radiator replace or recore?  Keeping it cool!
In preparation for my new Turner, I took the radiator to my 59 II 109
into the shop.  It had seemingly been working fine.  I wanted to have it
cleaned, flushed, checked and painted.  After they clean it, they said
it was totally shot full of holes.  They said they could have it recored
with exactly the same core, same dimensions, 5 tube and repainted for
$300.00 USD (they would use the same top and bottom tanks)
I could by a replacement radiator (series II, 3 tube) for about the same
price as having my existing radiator reuilt with a 5 tube.
What would you all recommend?
cwolfe

not only does the four cylinder one have more cores but it also holds
significantly more water

the top and bottom tanks should (almost) last for ever so there is no risk
in using them again (if ok)

don't even think about going with the later one - get the old one re-cored

------------------------------
[ <- Message 5 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980803 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]

From: GElam30092@aol.com
Date: Sun, 2 Aug 1998 22:12:42 EDT
Subject: ANARC 50th at Greek Peak

Just got home from Greek Peak.  I had it reasonably easy ... first class via
Delta and those friendly but crowded skies.

The event was excellent.  ALL of the organizing clubs deserve a huge "Thank
You" for getting it done and setting the standard for all future US Land
Rover-only events.  I believe the final count was slightly over 320 Land
Rovers.  There were Land Rovers of every description, size, color and power
configurations.  From Tdi's to Chevy V-8 with everything in between.  

The best part was putting faces to names and e-mail addresses.  The
unfortunate part was that it was impossible to meet everyone at such a large
event.  

I leave the exploits of the various events to those who drove and deserve to
tell their story!

Later...
Gerry Elam
PHX AZ

------------------------------
[ <- Message 6 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980803 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]

From: "Richard Marsden" <rmarsden@digicon-egr.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 1998 09:09:31 +0100
Subject: little test

Thought I'd gone?

Yes I have unsubscribed, this is just a test to make sure I have.
I actual unsubscribed on Friday, but I still kept getting stuff - the
unsubscribes went for approval...
Think I've actually gone this time...

You can see how someone who isn't particularly Internet-aware, has trouble
and starts groaning to
the list!!

No need to reply,etc,etc.

Richard (ex-Gurkha SIII 109 FFR)

------------------------------
[ <- Message 7 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980803 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]

  END OF * LIST DIGEST 
 Input:  messages 6 lines 307 [forwarded 2 whitespace 0]
 Output: lines 257 [content 194  forwarded 2 (cut  0) whitespace 0]

This has been the last portion of the lro-digest-ltd

If you would like to unsubscribe from this service contact
Majordomo@Land-Rover.Team.Net and request 'unsubscribe lro-digest-ltd'

The lro-digest-ltd is the same content as the lro-digest, but it is split
into a number of smaller pieces which are limited in size to 400 lines.

This is to allow access by users whose mail servers may not allow larger
messages (typicaly over 30KB).

Today's multipart digest is composed of the following portions:

   lines   chars	portions
[ First Message | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980803 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]


Digest Messages Copyright 1990-1999 by the original poster or/and
Empire Rover Owners Society, All rights reserved.

Photos & text Copyright 1990-1999 Bill Caloccia, All rights reserved.

Empire/LRO List of charges for Empire/LRO Policies against the distribution of unsolicited commercial e-mail (aka SPAM).
Empire/LRO fees for the distribution of unsolicited commercial e-mail (aka SPAM).
Frequently Asked Questions


<--Back

HOME

TOP

Forward -->

height=31 width=88 alt="Made with Macintosh" border=0>

Powered by Sun