[ First Message Last | Table of Contents | <- Digest -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: SPYDERS@aol.com Date: Fri, 17 Jul 1998 07:07:14 EDT Subject: RE: Diconnecting the headlights/ rephraseing the question. In a message dated 7/16/98 9:45:51 PM, you wrote: in halogen headlights. Prepare for a large barrage of questions.>> I switched from stock sealed beam headlights (US) to Hella H-4 Halogens. Aside from having a better bulb in them, you can see that the lens is of better quality and the light pattern is more even. I would highly recommend them. Turn them off before you dunk the car in water, because they do run hotter than normal candles, and will crack if suddenly immersed in cool water. You also get a choice of bulbs to put in, but if you want big illumination, make sure your wires won't melt. I also ran a 10ga power supply to some 30A relays for the lamps, using the original headlight wires as triggers, that way the lamps don't draw power through the switch, probably not a huge issue on the 110, but maybe more of one on a 2 fuse setup. --pat. ------------------------------[ <- Message 2 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980718 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Jett.Hogger@prodigy.com (MR JOHN M ROSSI) Date: Fri, 17 Jul 1998 07:54:39, -0500 Subject: Should I paint a new galvanised frame? Hello Joe. I would leave it alone or maybe clear coat it. Did you have your frame done in knoxville? I live in Flintstone, ga. Just south of chattanooga. And would did it cost to have the frame done? Do you have the name, address, and phone of the company? Thanks John ____ John Rossi ------------------------------[ <- Message 3 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980718 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Adrian Redmond <channel6@post2.tele.dk> Date: Fri, 17 Jul 1998 13:43:20 +0200 Subject: Re: A Leak of Rovers. How about "A cloud of land Rovers" Adrian Redmond CHANNEL 6 TELEVISION DENMARK (Adrian Redmond) Foerlevvej 6 Mesing DK-8660 Skanderborg Denmark telephone (office) +45 86 57 22 66 telephone (home) +45 86 57 22 64 telefacsimile / data +45 86 57 24 46 mobile GSM (EFP unit) +45 40 74 75 64 mobile GSM (admin) +45 40 54 22 66 mobile NMT +45 30 86 75 66 e-mail channel6@post2.tele.dk Visit our homepages! www.channel6.dk ------------------------------[ <- Message 4 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980718 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Alan_Richer@motorcity2.lotus.com Date: Fri, 17 Jul 1998 07:58:56 -0400 Subject: Re: Should I paint a new galvanised frame? Painting a frame: Depends - if you want it to look original - go ahead and do it. Etch the silly thing with vinegar before you do, though - most paints don't stick well to galvanizing. Does it actually need to be painted - I'd say no. Galvanizing in itself is a good protectant. Waxoyl - why not? Won't hurt anything... Just don't jam the frame on rocks and break the zinc coating and you'll do fine. ajr ------------------------------[ <- Message 5 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980718 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Alan_Richer@motorcity2.lotus.com Date: Fri, 17 Jul 1998 08:03:48 -0400 Subject: Re: A Cloud?? of Rovers. Dunno about that one.... Somehow, I always picture clouds as light and fluffy - a Rover is about as light and fluffy as a brick souffle.... A Menace of Rovers, maybe.....8*) ajr ------------------------------[ <- Message 6 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980718 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Richard Marsden" <rmarsden@digicon-egr.co.uk> Date: Fri, 17 Jul 1998 13:13:22 +0100 Subject: Re: A Cloud?? of Rovers. All this talk of springs.... A Wallow of Rovers? Alan_Richer@motorcity2.lotus.com on 07/17/98 01:03:48 PM Please respond to lro@playground.sun.com cc: (bcc: Richard Marsden/EAME/VDGC) Subject: Re: A Cloud?? of Rovers. Dunno about that one.... Somehow, I always picture clouds as light and fluffy - a Rover is about as light and fluffy as a brick souffle.... A Menace of Rovers, maybe.....8*) ajr ------------------------------[ <- Message 7 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980718 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: TeriAnn Wakeman <twakeman@cruzers.com> Date: Fri, 17 Jul 98 05:24:34 -0700 Subject: Re: Hoisting the engine. Where to wrap chain or connect to engine? >So what is the best way to hoist it? Where should I anchor my chains or >wrap the chains? Never done this before. If your engine is complete there should be metal plates at each end of your head that have slot shaped holes in them. These are lifting rings. You need a length of chain with hooks. A common alternative for engines missing the lifting plates is to use the head bolts. You need to take a large dia chain, round out the last link with a punch. Put a flat asher between the bolt head and the chain link then tighten down the bolt. If the bolt sticks up, it can bend under the weight of the engine. TeriAnn Wakeman The Green Rover, rebuilt and Santa Cruz, California and maintained using parts from twakeman@cruzers.com British Pacific 800-554-4133 http://www.cruzers.com/~twakeman Walk in harmony with the earth and all her creatures and you will create beauty wherever you go. ------------------------------[ <- Message 8 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980718 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Wolfe, Charles" <CWolfe@smdc.org> Date: Fri, 17 Jul 1998 07:40:19 -0500 Subject: H4s(90/145) vs Vision Plus (60/55) I am going Halogen. After discussing the matter with local law enforcement, it appears that the state of Minnesota does not have a wattage limit. Therefore it appears that H4s (90/145) are legal. What are your recommendations: H4s (90/145) or Rover North Hella Vison Plus (60/55). Any problems with going with the higher wattage H4s? I assume (and my local state trooper agrees) that if I am legal and licensed in MN, that a state with a wattage limit cannot issue a citation for the H4s as I drive through their state. What are your collective thoughts on this matter? Thanks. cwolfe ------------------------------[ <- Message 9 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980718 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: MRogers315@aol.com Date: Fri, 17 Jul 1998 09:21:29 EDT Subject: Re-A few questions from a newbie Kevin asked; Could I use one to pull a trailer, i.e. a trailer with an MGB race car on it? No problem, so long as the combined weight fits within your local vehicle/trailer regs. I have towed a large vehicle trailer plus Range Rover load with a 2 1/4 petrol Lightweight. It would not go very fast but felt safe and stopping was no problem. Is it possible to drop the famous Rover aluminum V-8 into a Series? Again no problem, this is a very popular conversion here in the UK. Many companies make conversion plates to couple the V8 to both ser 11 and 111 gearboxes. The power can be a little too much for the drive train if driven with a heavy right foot, but many have been driven for years with this conversion with only the odd broken half shaft in Rover axles. The later 109s of course have a Sailsbury rear axle which will cope much better. The brakes can easily be upgraded to cope with the extra speed of a V8 in earlier 88s by using later 109 parts. Fitting 3.9 diff's from the Range Rover will improve highway speeds, and strenghthen the drive train, whilst retaining standard half shafts, unfortuanatly these cannot be used in the Sailsbury axles. The ser 11 gearbox seems to handle the extra power better than the ser111. If a series Land Rover with a Rover V8 is what you fancy then go for it, it could turn out to be much more fun than the MG, and at much safer speeds. I get all the motoring thrills I need at walking pace or less, but it is still great sport to leave boy racers in hot hatches standing at the lights now and again. Even more fun to do it to them again at the next set (this trick works best in the wet). Mike Rogers Lightweight/Range Rover hybrid (with Rover V8) ------------------------------[ <- Message 10 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980718 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Richard Clarke"<Richard.Clarke@nre.vic.gov.au> ------------------------------[ <- Message 11 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980718 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Jarvis64@aol.com Date: Fri, 17 Jul 1998 09:21:33 EDT Subject: 6000 miles in 3 weeks (kind of wordy) Hi everybody, Long time no read. Doggone, you people write a lot. I've spent the last several hours trying to catch up on my e-mail, and so far have made it as far as 26 June. I now live in Columbus, GA, and my phone number here (not that any of you ever had my old number, but . . .) is (706)-569-8493. Please give me a call if you are cruising through and want to chat/ visit/ sleep on my floor. For those of you who care, here is the Readers' Digest version of my trip: For those who don't, just hit the "previous" arrow on your screen now and move on to something REALLY interesting, like whether or not 110 axles are strong enough to propel a series vehicle in 2WD. 18 June: Left Watertown and drove to Ottawa w/ a friend who's dating a girl up there (on the Quebec side). Went to an awful trendy bar w/ about 75% males in attendance (and NO it wasn't one of those bars) until entirely too late in the evening. Slept at a friend of his girlfriend's apt. 19 June: Woke late, went out, ate dinner, out to bar. back home w/ Captain Excitement and his girlfriend by midnight, at which point I announced that I was off to the rally. Drove back into town, hung around until last call (had ONE PINT, for those of you shocked at any drunken driving implications of that sentence), and left for the BDay Party. Arrived at 4, having consumed two large cups of coffee. Attempted to wrap up in my poncho on the grass next to my Rover until I gave up at 6:30, having donated several pints to the local mosquito population. 19-21 June: Did the Rally thing. Best darn LR event I've ever been to. Perhaps some offset rims would make Mrs. Merdle a bit more stable on side slopes . . . 21 June: Leave Rally; drive to Kingston for dinner at the Brewing Company. My favorite place for a pint. Had to say goodbye. Then off to Watertown to get the last few things from my apt. Cleared it out about 11:30 and then drove to Buffalo and got a hotel room. 22 June: Drove to Grandparents' house just north of Columbus, Ohio. Trip uneventful 23 June: Check all my gear oil levels and grease U-joints. Leave Ohio at 9; arrive St. Louis MO at 4:30. Stay there for a few days for some good friends' wedding. Put in a 160 degree thermostat to try to combat high temps while driving at 65mph for long periods. Recieved DeLUXE seat bottom for MY side of the car, cause my butt wasn't going to hold out for the trip on my old "looks like a cushion but you'll really be sitting on plywood" SIIA seat. Had to drive to UPS depot to pick it up since Eric "extension 231 at AB" Riston thinks "Lora" and "Flora" are indistinguishable. But I didn't mind once I placed my hindquarters on that luxurious piece of vinyl heaven. Maybe someday I'll treat my occaisonal passenger to that kind of comfort. 28 June: Leave St. Louis at 6 a.m. for Evergreen CO, intending to stop somewhere in KS. Just kept driving, though. 880 miles in a dismal 17.5 hours. Sorry to have skipped generous invite in Manhattan KS, but just got in a groove and couldn't stop. 29 June: Disassemble/reassemble FR Warn hub w/ fresh RTV. Leak stopped. Topped off all oils. Leaned carb mixture 1/2 turn and advanced timing for altitude. Note both rear hubs leaking down interior of brake backplates (maybe should've put new distance pieces on when i put new seals on the Salisbury prior to install. eh?) but contamination not going on shoes, so no worries (as our annoying waiter at Outback steakhouse said the other night right before I strangled him). 30 June: meet Jim Hall and go do some great off-roading in CO between South Park (like the TV show I guess) and Breckenridge. Beautiful. Intermittent overheating problems, exacerbated by altitude which causes water to boil even sooner. 1 July: go offroad with Jim again, this time vic. Central City. Jim suffers flat tire. Mrs. Merdle just overheats. Encounter two vehicles slid off the trail on pretty bad sideslopes. Guy w/ Bronco and NO CLUE (later in day I asked him if he had a snatch block and he said "a what?") winches them to safety. Jim and I lead the way for clueless Bronco man and another guy in a mid-80s Land Cruiser through the darn deep snow drift that stymied the others. Granted, we shoveled and towed and rammed our way through, but we made it. I was pretty skittish due to my recent flop over on a sideslope, but I guess it's just good therapy to be terrified. 2 July: No significant Rover activity. Went to Boulder w/ the non-Rover owner I was staying w/ and spotted a SIIA Bugeye 88" w/ California plates. Very nice. Anyone on the list own it? 3 July: Did my stupid human trick again: Drive 880 miles in a series vehicle in one day. Took only 15 hours this time because it was premeditated stupidity and therefore far more efficient. 4 July: 400 or so miles back to Ohio and Grandma's cookin'. Put US flag on the snorkel of my British made vehicle to celebrate. 5 July: Normal maintenance. 6 July: 500 miles to parents' house in NJ. Never had to take her out of overdrive across PA. Noticed tendency for engine to hiccup, like not getting gas when at low rpm w/ lots of wellie (like when getting back on the highway). 7 July: Drive to Jeff Meyer's house in Queens (lots of tolls) to pick up tailgate from him. Had lunch w/ his parents and a nice visit, though Jeff was off slaving over a hot laptop at the extreme end of LI, so I didn't get to see him. Decide to remedy hiccup. New sparkplugs. Can't find gapper tool. Buy tool. Take plugs back out and gap them. New air and fuel filter. Now running on 3 cylinders. Try to back into garage at dad's house. Nasty, nasty clacking sound suddenly eminates from engine. Shut it down. Replace all plug wires (probably cause of 3-cylinder syndrome). Dad starts her up while I peer anxiously under the hood. Noise cures itself. Install new electric fan, much to the relief of OVLR members who had to listen to my other one at the BDay party. Hope to cure overheating problem w/ this. 8 July: Drive from NJ to Wash DC. Spend time w/ my sister, friends from college, DaveB and Spenny on the 9th. 10 July: Drive to friend's house in Madison VA. Engine still running pretty hot on highway. 11 July: Go off-roading w/ DaveB up some trail Charlie from RN assures him goes to the top of some mountain. Many hours w/ chainsaw, machete, and muscles get us nowhere. We go swimming and back to friend's house for dinner. 12 July: Drive to Charlotte, NC, stopping for 1) a huge, huge wreck on 64, and 2) to pick up a 109 soft top in Richmond from David. Lot farther to Charlotte than I thought. Arrive at 1:30 a.m., unable to think. 13 July: Leave Charlotte, drive to Columbus GA. Lot farther than I though. Arrive at 9:30 p.m. unable to think. So that's it--6000 miles of joy. Good to be back amongst you all. Somebody from SOLAROS give me a call, or e-mail me your phone number, seeing as how AOL helpfully erased all my mail from before I left. Bill Rice Mrs. "wow it's hot down here" Merdle ------------------------------[ <- Message 12 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980718 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Jarvis64@aol.com Date: Fri, 17 Jul 1998 09:21:42 EDT Subject: 3 vs. 4 tube radiator Hi everyone, My 109 is running hot (200-210 degrees) on the highway when it's hot out and I'm driving 60-65 mph (w/ o/d.) I have a Pontiac 2.5l in there, so I'll keep my question general. How much difference in cooling ability is there between the SIIA (4 tube, I've been led to believe) and the newer SIII radiators? I replaced my old SIIA rad. (had to run 25% antifreeze, 25% water, 50% stop leak) w/ a nice new SIII rad this spring and now she gets too hot. On road isn't really bad, around town is fine--around 180, but off road going up prolonged hills (like in CO and VA) she just had to be shut down for about 5 min. once she got to 210 or else she'd get too hot. Would a 4 tube rad help this. How 'bout an oil cooler (easy to fit to the GM engine)? Thanks for any input you all can give to my predicament. Please be gentle with the "if you weren't an apostate you wouldn't be in this fix" comments. Bill Rice ------------------------------[ <- Message 13 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980718 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Russ Wilson <rwwilson@mho.net> Date: Fri, 17 Jul 1998 07:38:49 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: ** 1989 RANGE ROVER FOR SALE ** >***1989 RANGE ROVER FOR SALE*** >White with Sorrell beige leather, excellent condition inside and out, never >off road, new tires around, 103k miles, no leaks, brushbar, lamp guards, CD >changer, rust free upper tailgate, sunroof. Email for photos. I'd like to >sell this truck by months end. and maybe you will if you let people know where you are.... I'm looking for a used RR myself. Russ Wilson Leslie Bittner ------------------------------[ <- Message 14 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980718 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "A. P. \"Sandy\" Grice" <rover@pinn.net> Date: Fri, 17 Jul 1998 10:54:12 -0400 Subject: Battery Advice Adrian Redmond <channel6@post2.tele.dk> wrote: >So what does the combined wisdom of the list have to say about battery >maintenance? Here's a thread which can run a few days eh? >Whats the opinion/experience on the best way to bring a fair battery >back to excellent - and to keep it that way? The major cause of battery demise is "sulfation" a build-up of lead sulfide "sponge" on the plates. I've used this cadmium solution (*very* poisonous stuff) called "VX-6" from JC Whitless, though I've seen similar stuff in auto parts stores. One day, my battery was flat dead. Added the VX-6 (which, at the time I thought was snake oil) stuff and used the hand crank to get to work. 10 min later and a half a block from work, I ran out of gas in the middle of an intersection. In that brief 10 min., the battery built up enough power so I could use the starter to crawl me out of the intersection. Cheers *----jeep may be famous, LAND-ROVER is Legendary----* | | | A. P. ("Sandy") Grice | | Rover Owners' Association of Virginia, Ltd. | | Association of North American Rover Clubs | | 1633 Melrose Pkwy., Norfolk, VA 23508-1730 | |(O)757-622-7054, (H)757-423-4898, FAX 757-622-7056 | *----1972 Series III------1996 Discovery SE-7(m)----* ------------------------------[ <- Message 15 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980718 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "A. P. \"Sandy\" Grice" <rover@pinn.net> Date: Fri, 17 Jul 1998 10:54:14 -0400 Subject: Gauges "Wolfe, Charles" <CWolfe@smdc.org> wrote: >ANybody have any smith Oilpressure guages (mechanical)? I really could >use one. I am also interested in good tachometer for rover. >If anyone finds some good guages there, oil pressure, circular ampmeter, >or tachometer, I would be interested. Thanks Get to the flea market of the nearest British auto show. Bought a used gauge at Bowie for $5 and the original Smith's fitting kit for $10. Most vendors will have dozens of used guages. Touble is, I now need a 1/4" male BST to 1/8" male BST union to hook it up...at *that* is unavailable on this continent.... *----jeep may be famous, LAND-ROVER is Legendary----* | | | A. P. ("Sandy") Grice | | Rover Owners' Association of Virginia, Ltd. | | Association of North American Rover Clubs | | 1633 Melrose Pkwy., Norfolk, VA 23508-1730 | |(O)757-622-7054, (H)757-423-4898, FAX 757-622-7056 | *----1972 Series III------1996 Discovery SE-7(m)----* ------------------------------[ <- Message 16 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980718 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Luis Manuel Gutierrez" <lgutierr@jccr.co.cr> Date: Fri, 17 Jul 1998 08:51:27 -0500 Subject: RE: Freelander and defenders to US A BMW diesel? I doubt that would be a minus. My experince with with BMW diesels tells me that those are incredible engines. Incredibly agile, and very powerfull, but when it comes to self repairing... better get a PhD for it. Lic. LUIS MANUEL GUTIERREZ CHACON Jose Cartellone Construcciones Civiles S.A. E-mail: lgutierr@jccr.co.cr Tel: (506) 296 2743 Fax: (506) 296 2744 -----Mensaje original----- De: John C. Hinkle <defender110@email.msn.com> Para: lro@playground.sun.com <lro@playground.sun.com> Fecha: Jueves 16 de Julio de 1998 08:04 PM Asunto: Freelander and defenders to US >If they bring defenders into the US in 2001, they won't look like they do >now. >They will have front and side airbags. Probably unibody construction and the >bumpers will be plastic and rounded, sort of like a Lexus. And a 300 Tdi >engine, I doubt it - probably a BMW diesel. Still want one? >Chris Hinkle ------------------------------[ <- Message 17 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980718 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Tackley, John" <jtackley.dit@state.va.us> Date: Fri, 17 Jul 1998 10:56:58 -0400 Subject: RE: Breather alternative Me thinks a calendar would be more accurate... > including a VDO 2-1/16"Clock that would fit that blank third hole in > the dash > panel....hhmmmm........ > ...do I really wanna know how long it takes to get to Greek Peak, or > how > long my feet have been baking, in my SIII ? >> > No, but you could use it to guage performance by measuring [ truncated by list-digester (was 12 lines)] > acceleration... ;-) > --pat. ------------------------------[ <- Message 18 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980718 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: CIrvin1258@aol.com Date: Fri, 17 Jul 1998 11:43:59 EDT Subject: Re: Freelander and defenders to US/BMW diesel Hey - for those of you that don't know, BMW is running a diesel-powered race car, in the European Touring Car class VERY COMPETITEVELY! They have been, for at least the last 2-3 years. Very impressive. Charles ------------------------------[ <- Message 19 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980718 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Faure, Marin" <Marin.Faure@PSS.Boeing.com> Date: Fri, 17 Jul 1998 09:39:21 -0700 Subject: Re. Freelanders come to America While the Freelander was designed from the outset to appeal to the North American market (that's why there is, or will be, a V-6 engine option), waiting another 2-3 years to introduce it doesn't seem to make a lot of sense. Land Rover timed the market very well, introducing the Freelander at a time when buyers are much more interested in car-like 4wds instead of larger, truck-like 4wds. Toyota RAV4s and the like are selling very well in the UK, as is the Jeep Grand Cherokee which gets consistently high marks for on-pavement handling. Vehicles like the Mercedes ML320, Honda CRV, etc., are becoming more popular by the day as SUVs are being used for the same purposes as station wagons were in the past. Off-road capabilities are irrelevant to the majority of today's SUV buyers, although I guess it's nice to brag about your new vehicle's theoretical capabilities to your neighbor. But the truth of the matter is that a very tiny percentage of the 4wds sold today every leave the pavement. >From a marketing perspective, I would think the time to be putting the Freelander in North American showrooms is now, not a couple of years down the road. Who knows what people will want then. I personally have no interest in the Freelander, although having seen a lot of them in the UK during a vacation in May I was surprised to see they are considerably larger and more roomy than photographs imply. But I would think that LRNA would be making every effort to get the vehicles in here NOW rather than wait and take the chance that the market has become a) saturated and b) moved on to something else. LRNA should have been working with Land Rover from the outset to make sure the Freelander met US specs from day one. Then they would have been in a position to take advantage of the vehicle's appeal at a time when the demand was the highest. Maybe things won't change that much in a couple of years, but you never know... __________________ C. Marin Faure faurecm@halcyon.com marin.faure@boeing.com (original owner) 1973 Land Rover Series III-88 1991 Range Rover Vogue SE ------------------------------[ <- Message 20 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980718 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "David and Cynthia Walker" <wahooadv@earthlink.net> Date: Fri, 17 Jul 1998 10:03:09 -0700 Subject: Re: H4s(90/145) vs Vision Plus (60/55) I use H4's - 90/150s and I love them - of course, I have an earlier breakfast with sealed beams in it. (yes, that means I have 4 headlights) Just some thoughts though - if you have a generator, you will run out of battery power during the night! Also - you will constantly be flashed and you will make no friends in anyone you follow with those bright bulbs. I run H4's in the wings (open highway and off road - or when I wish to melt incoming traffic :-) I run sealed beams - much more friendly - in the breakfast. The best of both worlds Cheers David Full-time father of a 3.5 year old 1970 Land Rover IIA, 88" - "BEAN TOAD" S/V KALAKALA, Ingrid 38, ketch - our home wahooadv@earthlink.net ------------------------------[ <- Message 21 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980718 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: GElam30092@aol.com Date: Fri, 17 Jul 1998 13:25:40 EDT Subject: Group of LR's?? <<BTW, What DOES one call a group of Rovers - a leak?>> Actually, the AZLRO mail list has used something similar to this for a couple of years. We call our various groups puddles as follows: "The thing which is AZLRO is a very decentralized, informal collection of people who own and drive any kind of Land Rovers. This is NOT a club and does not hold meetings. There are no dues and no officers. AZLRO currently has "Puddles" (if you've owned any kind Land Rover for a while you know what a puddle is) in Tucson, the Phoenix area and Flagstaff. " Cheers, Gerry Elam PHX AZ USA '73 Series III "Tigger" (daily driver until it hits 110 F / 43 C) '64 Series IIA Dormobile "Humpty Dumpty" (currently in pieces) '95 Disco "Great White" ------------------------------[ <- Message 22 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980718 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Faure, Marin" <Marin.Faure@PSS.Boeing.com> Date: Fri, 17 Jul 1998 10:32:01 -0700 Subject: Defenders back to the US Land Rover has been threatening to re-design the Defender for years. The current version, which is simply an update of the old Series models, is VERY expensive to produce. I've visited the assembly line in Solihull, and it's like watching people put together a bunch of Revell models. The body panels are actually attached to "sprues" for painting and transportation within the factory, and the assembly process is very labor-intensive. At one point, Land Rover was seriously considering ending Defender production once and for all, and using the Discovery as a platform for utility bodies like pickups, crew-cabs, panel vans, etc. I don't know what made them change their mind; perhaps the military had a lot to do with it. But reducing manufacturing costs will be a large factor in the re-design process, and will likely lead to some "radical" changes. The little bit of information I've gotten from people I know in England who are in the commercial vehicle trade indicates that a re-designed Defender would be quite a bit different than the vehicle we know by that name today. While this is largely speculation, of course, people I know who have reason in the course of their profession to talk to Land Rover folks tell me that a re-designed Defender may likely have: frameless, unibody construction of steel rather than aluminum; wide use of plastic to reduce weight (grills, bumpers, interior components, etc.); a car-like interior; independent suspension heavier than but similar to the Freelander's as this gives better handling and ride on roads; a narrow range of engine options to reduce manufacturing costs (possibly the 5-cylinder "Storm" diesel and some sort of BMW-based petrol engine, probably not the current Rover V-8 which will most likely be gone by then). The Defender's popularity as a farm/utility vehicle (except in the US where it's marketed as a status toy) will probably influence the company to maintain reasonably strong construction, good ground clearance, and a chassis that can accept a variety of utility bodies. The restrictions on off-road driving are increasing every year, particularly in the UK and western Europe, and customer interest in, and need for, heavy-duty, off-road capabilities is decreasing. Farmers in the UK use Land Rovers more for their carrying and towing capabilities than for their 4wd capabilities. They aren't driving the rocks of Moab, they just need to get out of the mud occasionally. So my friends speculate that the re-designed Defender's 4wd capabilities will be simplified, perhaps a stronger and more capable version of the system that's in the Freelander. They're betting that the 2-speed transfer case will be a thing of the past, although the Defender will still retain the ability to crawl around in a slow and "torquey" mode. But regardless of what Land Rover decides to do, there is one thing you can bet on. Whatever is sent to the US will be expensive as hell. LRNA has been brilliant in its marketing strategy starting with the Range Rover in 1987, and they have pretty much trained US buyers to willingly cough up big bucks for anything with the Land Rover badge on it. Someone mentioned they may bring in the Defender 130 crew-cab, assuming there still is such an animal in the lineup come then. I'd be willing to bet that it will cost at least $60K in 1998 dollars if they do. Being as how you'll be able to buy an equivalent, full-size US pickup for not much more than half that amount, Land Rovers will continue to be recreational vehicles for the wealthy as opposed to a practical solution for the tradesman who needs a working truck. That's really too bad, for as someone who's used a Land Rover as a working vehicle for years, I can attest to the fact that they do a very, very good job. __________________ C. Marin Faure faurecm@halcyon.com marin.faure@boeing.com (original owner) 1973 Land Rover Series III-88 1991 Range Rover Vogue SE ------------------------------[ <- Message 23 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980718 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
[digester: Removing section of: Content-Type: multipart/mixed; ] From: "Ray Burton" <Ray_Burton@usairways.com> Date: Fri, 17 Jul 1998 13:32:38 -0400 Subject: Re: Group of LR's?? Content-Disposition: inline Gerry, Will you be attending the grand event at Greek Peak near Courtland NY? Hopefully you can get your Dormobile restored soon. Ray Burton (Embedded image moved GElam30092@aol.com to file: 07/17/98 01:25 PM pic32629.pcx) Please respond to lro@playground.sun.com cc: (bcc: Ray Burton/VEN/USAIR) Subject: Group of LR's?? <<BTW, What DOES one call a group of Rovers - a leak?>> Actually, the AZLRO mail list has used something similar to this for a couple of years. We call our various groups puddles as follows: "The thing which is AZLRO is a very decentralized, informal collection of people who own and drive any kind of Land Rovers. This is NOT a club and does not hold meetings. There are no dues and no officers. AZLRO currently has "Puddles" (if you've owned any kind Land Rover for a while you know what a puddle is) in Tucson, the Phoenix area and Flagstaff. " Cheers, Gerry Elam PHX AZ USA '73 Series III "Tigger" (daily driver until it hits 110 F / 43 C) '64 Series IIA Dormobile "Humpty Dumpty" (currently in pieces) '95 Disco "Great White" --0__=ufflRujIiPuZ8jtwZykWeMjnQaJ0d9VFMMBKOJD2CaxP9r0HFU8ggSgG ------------------------------[ <- Message 24 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980718 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: GElam30092@aol.com Date: Fri, 17 Jul 1998 13:36:26 EDT Subject: 110's in the US? I just returned from a short vacation in Brazil and a business trip in Monterrey Mexico. Didn't spot any LR's in Mexico but saw 5 LR's in Brazil. All were white 110's and every one was a diesel! At the time I was thinking, "it's not fair" but then, life never is. I guess if I don't buy any more LR's between now and 2002(?), I might be able to afford a new 110 if and when they hit the shores. Nah.... it'll never have the classic styling and lines of my Dormobile. Unless I convert it to a Dormobile. Now there's a thought. Speaking of which, it'll probably take me 'till then to get HD like I want it! Yes, I anticipate asking a lot of stupid questions here starting in the next couple o' months. Too damn hot to work outside here now. It has hit at least 115 degrees/ 46 degree Celsius for the last couple of days. Dry heat my ass. When it's that hot, the humidity means nothing! The plan is to park it inside my little 2-car garage when it cools down a little and start the project this fall. Should be fun! Later... Gerry Elam PHX AZ USA '73 Series III "Tigger" (daily driver until it hits 110 F / 43 C) '64 Series IIA Dormobile "HD" (Humpty Dumpty, currently in pieces) '95 Disco "Great White" ------------------------------[ <- Message 25 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980718 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: GElam30092@aol.com Date: Fri, 17 Jul 1998 13:43:23 EDT Subject: Names? << So now what do you call a Rover that doesn't leak and sits level?>> Empty? Out of oil? Gerry Elam PHX AZ ------------------------------[ <- Message 26 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980718 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: William S Kowalski <70252.1204@compuserve.com> Date: Fri, 17 Jul 1998 14:29:46 -0400 Subject: Re: 3 vs. 4 tube radiator Hi Bill: We met at the OVLA Birthday party and you were discussing your "HOT" engine then. As I mentioned, you need a Land-Rover fan cowling between the radiator and engine and normal engine driven fan blade extending into the cowl, then throw out the electric fan and your problems will go away like magic. Bill Kowalski Chicago, Illinois '67 L-R IIA 109" SW ( Doesn't run HOT) '63 Austin-Healey "BJ-7" (Runs HOT in parades) '53 RR Bentley "R" ( Doesn't run HOT in parades or at 80 mph and this puppy is for sale) ------------------------------[ <- Message 27 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980718 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: SPYDERS@aol.com Date: Fri, 17 Jul 1998 16:22:42 EDT Subject: Re: RE: Freelander and defenders to US In a message dated 7/17/98 10:58:33 AM, you wrote: <<A BMW diesel? I doubt that would be a minus. My experince with with BMW diesels tells me that those are incredible engines. Incredibly agile, and very powerfull, but when it comes to self repairing... better get a PhD for it.>> So, why'd LR take it out of the RR in favor of the VM from italy? Apparently it was a good diesel in cars, but didn't take well to the RR... --pat. ------------------------------[ <- Message 28 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980718 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Paul Quin <Paul_Quin@pml.com> Date: Fri, 17 Jul 1998 13:50:00 -0700 Subject: Solex Spindle Size Does anybody know the exact size (diameter) of the throttle spindle on a Solex? A shop just down the road from me will put bushings in my leaky Solex but they only have a few sizes to work with... Tx. Paul Quin 1961 Series II 88 Victoria, BC Canada http://www.geocities.com/MotorCity/Garage/4954/ ------------------------------[ <- Message 29 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980718 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Brian Cramer <defender@uscom.com> Date: Fri, 17 Jul 1998 17:19:12 -0400 Subject: Re: ** 1989 RANGE ROVER FOR SALE ** Sorry about that Chief! I'm located in Southern New Jersey, just East of Philadelphia. Brian At 10:38 AM 7/17/98 , you wrote: >>***1989 RANGE ROVER FOR SALE*** >>White with Sorrell beige leather, excellent condition inside and out, never > [ truncated by lro-lite (was 6 lines)] >>changer, rust free upper tailgate, sunroof. Email for photos. I'd like to >>sell this truck by months end. >and maybe you will if you let people know where you are.... I'm looking >for a used RR myself. [ truncated by list-digester (was 17 lines)] >Russ Wilson >Leslie Bittner ------------------------------[ <- Message 30 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980718 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "William L. Leacock" <wleacock@pipeline.com> Date: Fri, 17 Jul 1998 17:32:28 -0400 Subject: Headlight disconnect Charles: on a ser 2 and 2A the headlight wires pass through the back of the headlamp bowl, follow the wires to the underside of the bonnet ( hood release mechanism, you will find that the wires are held in spring clips, pull out the wires and you will then find the standard Lucas, bullet connnectors. The ground wire is a bullet connector in a clip which is screwewd to the underside of the panel. After this the healdight wires can be pulled out of the sides of the front panel permitting its removal. This assumes that the wiring was not modified by the PO who changed the headlights from bulbs to sealed beam units. Bill Leacock ( Limey in exile ) NY USA. 88 and 109 LR's and 89 RR ------------------------------[ <- Message 31 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980718 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Ian Harper/Donna-Claire McLeod <tantramar@golden.net> Date: Fri, 17 Jul 1998 18:34:19 +0000 Subject: Weber correction jet Weber Questions.... The PO had put a bolt in the top of the carb where the correction jet goes, so it idled beautifully (with Full choke) but did little else....stalled when I put the gas to her.... I took it out and put a jet in, now it runs rrrrrich (with no choke) lotsa smoke in the garage, lost the back wall at one point! Question is...what size jet goes in the correction tube? I have a 240, 170 and a 160. Pointers Welcome!! Cheers, Ian PS What is it's official function?, as it's not adjustable....is it like the idler jet in a Zenith? -- Ian Harper/Donna Claire McLeod http://www.golden.net/~tantramar Tantramar House Bed and Breakfast Stratford, Ontario Phone(519) 273-7771 Fax (519) 273-3993 ------------------------------[ <- Message 32 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980718 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Wolfe, Charles" <CWolfe@smdc.org> Date: Fri, 17 Jul 1998 17:40:06 -0500 Subject: Name that switch/relay! So the old engine is out! Out with the old and in with the Turner. Yehah, we're having fun. I ordered a replacement wiring harness and I am going to put in a set of Hella's vision Plus headlights. So what is the wiring relay/ switch which is directly above the starter switch solenoid and directly below the fuse box? It has three wires on it connecting to two points. It is attached to the firewall by a bracket and appears to use to have some form of cable (old heater adjust maybe?) underneath it but on the same bracket. cwolfe ------------------------------[ <- Message 33 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980718 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Paul Quin <Paul_Quin@pml.com> Date: Fri, 17 Jul 1998 15:55:40 -0700 Subject: Carburation Principles - was - Weber correction jet Ian had some questions about jets & carburation. Here is another cut & past from http://www.autosite.com/garage/encyclop/tocdoc.asp Start of Past: VI. Carburetion A. Carburetion Theory for Better Troubleshooting Big, small, simple or complex, all carburetors share the same basic operating principles. If you make the effort to get a firm grasp of those principles, you'll be able to diagnose any specimen you happen to encounter even if it's unfamiliar. Essentials Knowledge of some simple physics is a necessary foundation. To begin with, only gasoline vapor will burn, so fuel must change its state from a liquid to a gas at some point or the engine won't run, and to do this it must absorb enough heat to boil. You may wonder how gasoline can boil when both the engine and the air are cold. The answer is reduced pressure. Just as water boils at a lower temperature on a mountain top than it does at sea level because there's less atmospheric pressure bearing down on it, so the vacuum in the carburetor's venturi and intake manifold causes fuel vaporization to occur when very little heat is present. The boiling point is reduced so that the fine atomized droplets that are sprayed into the intake stream vaporize from the latent heat in the air, no matter how little that might be. Of course, until the engine has warmed itself up, only a small portion of the available gasoline actually turns to vapor, which makes a very rich mixture as provided by the choke necessary. Ratio Air/fuel ratio is expressed in terms of weight, so a 15:1 ratio means 15 pounds of air to one pound of gasoline (by volume, that would be about 2,000 gallons of air to one gallon of fuel). The ideal "stoichiometric" ratio in which exactly the right amount of air is present to burn the fuel is actually 14.7:1, but maintaining such perfection requires the use of an oxygen or lambda (the Greek letter that has come to represent the ideal blend) sensor and electronically-controlled feedback or closed loop mixture adjustment, a subject covered in other sections of this encyclopedia. Any ratio from about 8:1 to 18:1 will fire dependably. In the former, there'll be more gasoline present than is needed, so all the air will be used up while much of the fuel will find nothing to combine with (it will be pumped raw into the exhaust system). In the latter lean mixture, there's more air present than is necessary to burn the fuel, so all the gasoline will be used up. It's important to realize that the actual reaction (the rapid oxidation of the fuel) always occurs at the 14.7:1 ratio regardless of the mixture that's actually supplied by the carburetor. Venturi action Whenever air passes through a tube, a pressure drop occurs, and this is the principle that moves fuel into the throat of a carburetor. But since the strength of the vacuum is directly proportional to the speed of the air column, some kind of boost is needed at low rpm, and that's the reason for the venturi. By placing a restriction in the throat, the air is forced to move faster and an extra pressure drop is created allowing atmospheric pressure on the fuel in the bowl to push enough through the nozzle to permit the engine to run. Vaporization is also enhanced. The above should help you understand the following explanations of the six systems found in almost every carburetor. Reservoir All the gasoline an engine uses makes an intermediate stop in the bowl, which supplies the idle, cruising, and power circuits, and the accelerator pump. A needle-and-seat valve and float arrangement keeps the bowl from over-filling when the engine is not using all the fuel the pump supplies. It may not seem that a bit of plastic or a tiny metal pontoon would have the buoyancy necessary to shut down the pump's considerable pressure, but it's affixed to a lever in such a way that it has plenty of mechanical advantage and can push the needle into its seat hard enough to do the job easily. At idle Since there's very little air passing through the venturi at idle, not enough vacuum is generated to move the fuel through the cruising system, so the idle circuit has to take over. This comprises a port below the throttle plate where there's plenty of vacuum, a passage from the bowl, and an adjustment screw. The velocity of the incoming air is low with the throttle almost closed, so the passage to the port usually has air bleed or emulsion holes in it to aid in atomizing the gasoline (it would be difficult to get a solid stream to vaporize). Some carburetors have idle air jets so that the throttle plates can close completely, somewhat similar to the idle air bypass of a typical fuel injection system. Hot air is relatively thin, so when the temperature is very high not enough air molecules are getting around the throttle plates at idle to make the proper blend. To eliminate the excessive richness this would cause, some carburetors have a hot idle compensator, which is simply an air passage that bypasses the throttle plates whenever a temperature-sensitive bimetal valve opens. Other fuel passages are needed to provide a smooth transition from idle to moderate rpm, and these are called transfer or off-idle ports or slots. They are positioned higher up in the barrel than the idle port and are progressively uncovered and exposed to vacuum as the throttle plate opens. They generally get fuel from the same tube as the idle port, but are not affected by the mixture screw. Cruise and stomp The next circuit to come into action is the main cruising system. This is a nozzle that sprays gasoline into the part of the venturi or venturis where the highest vacuum is present. It gets its supply of fuel in an amount controlled by the diameter of the main jet. This circuit works constantly at steady speeds and is calibrated for good gasoline mileage. Whenever the driver asks the engine to provide all the power possible by pushing the accelerator pedal to the floor, thus opening the throttle plate all the way, too much air enters the engine for the cruising circuit to handle. The mixture would lean out and output would be severely limited. So, the aptly-named power circuit is activated. This can be either a separate fuel valve or a metering or step-up rod that normally blocks some of the main jet's flow, but is pulled up out of the way by linkage or a spring when extra fuel is needed (the rod may be held down against a spring by a vacuum piston, then rise when the vacuum drop that occurs at wide open throttle reduces the force on the piston). Lag eliminator The circuits mentioned so far would be sufficient if the engine were only asked to run at a constant speed or to accelerate very gradually. That, however, is not the way cars are driven. The throttle is often opened too rapidly for the above systems to be able to keep up. The sudden blast of air would cause the engine to stumble or stall before enough fuel could be moved into the intake stream to provide a burnable mixture. The accelerator pump is what adapts the carburetor to the realities of the highway. It squirts an extra charge of gasoline into the intake stream whenever the throttle is opened, and, since it works mechanically, does so before the engine gets a chance to choke on too much plain air. It's an ordinary pump with one-way inlet and outlet valves and an air bleed, weight, or spring set-up to eliminate the possibility of fuel escaping from its nozzle because of vacuum. Super rich Finally, there's the choke, a device that gets the engine started even when it's too cold for the proper amount of gasoline to vaporize. By closing off the mouth of the carburetor so the manifold vacuum present during cranking causes a great deal of fuel to flow out of the bowl into the throat, enough vapor is available to allow the engine to fire. Once running, the powerplant starts producing sufficient vacuum to act on the diaphragm or piston of the choke pull-off mechanism, opening the choke enough to permit an adequate amount of air to enter the manifold for fast idle and cruising operation. As the engine warms up, a calibrated coil of flat metal that's connected to the choke plate expands from the heat of exhaust or coolant or an electrical element. Gradually, this expansion opens the choke until air flow is no longer restricted. End past. Paul Quin Victoria. ------------------------------[ <- Message 34 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980718 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Russ Wilson <rwwilson@mho.net> Date: Fri, 17 Jul 1998 16:02:17 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: Weber correction jet >Question is...what size jet goes in the correction tube? I have a 240, >170 and a 160. Adjust for altitude... Ontario is at what 500 or so ft. above sea level?? Call any parts supplier..British Bulldog, Rovers North or whoever and ask them for the correct jet.. then play with your plugs which are probably screwed now, and then get your timing set. good luck Russ Wilson Leslie Bittner ------------------------------[ <- Message 35 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980718 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Jarvis64@aol.com Date: Fri, 17 Jul 1998 19:29:48 EDT Subject: Re: Breather alternative John, I wouldn't bother spending $10 on new breathers that aren't even raised. Just get 1/4" pipe fittings w/ the 1/8 NPT thread on the other end, some clear 1/4" hose from Home Depot (or fuel line, which costs more and you can't see contamination bubbling up in), and some 1/4 " in-line fuel filters and make your own raised breathers for about the same cost. No water will get in if the end of the tube's not in the water. Plus this allows the axle to suck air in when rapidly cooled (immersed in a pond, for instance), which isn't a problem for most of Summit's customers, but which is for us. If the axle can't suck air in as it cools, it will develop a vacuum inside and possibly suck water in through your hub or pinion seals. So go w/ the raised breather. bill rice ------------------------------[ <- Message 36 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980718 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: DONOHUEPE@aol.com Date: Fri, 17 Jul 1998 19:29:55 EDT Subject: NAS Freelander An Open Letter to: Dr. Walter Hasselkus Rover Group Chairman and Chief Executive Solihull UK Sehr Geehrte Herr Doktor Hasselkus: Now that the needs of the broader North American public are to be met in 2001 with the Land Rover Freelander, when will you have a product to meet the needs of the traditional Land Rover fanatics who have historically been Land Rover customers in North America? These are the loyal customers who bought Defenders, who liked and bought the old series machines and who would today cheerfully buy these rugged and utilitarian machines if only they were available in this market. Especially if they were available at reasonable prices. My choice would be a double cab pickup with V8, 5 speed manual transmission and without the absurd exterior roll cage. Sadly these, along with the rest of the Defenders, are not available here. Must I dream forever, or will Land Rover have something to offer? Sincerely, Paul Donohue For 22 years a Land Rover owner. Denver Colorado CC: The LRO Digest ------------------------------[ <- Message 37 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980718 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Jarvis64@aol.com Date: Fri, 17 Jul 1998 19:29:43 EDT Subject: Re: POR neophyte - again! I just caught up to the 16th's e-mail. I think you need to strip paint off, then etch, then POR-15. That's what I did on my Salisbury before slinging it under Mrs. M. and it worked just fine--although I'll be able to tell you how well it worked in a few years. Actually I didn't strip the paint; there just wasn't any on there. But that acid etcher is really mild; caused no apparent change in any surface I sprayed it on. Bill Rice ------------------------------[ <- Message 38 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980718 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Jarvis64@aol.com Date: Fri, 17 Jul 1998 19:30:10 EDT Subject: Re: Re: 3 vs. 4 tube radiator Bill (Kowalski that is), Thanks for answering my query. I did get rid of the elec. fan that I had on there during the BDay Party. Put in another electric fan, but mounted behind the rad, and w/ more than 2x the cfm rating of the earlier elec. fan., which I suspect was acting more as a radiator muff on the highway than a fan. This new fan pushes all kinds of air back at the engine, and my problems are not at low speed (except off-road on long steep hills) or in traffic, as I assume they would be if the problem were lack of a fan shroud. She used to run hot w/ the old radiator, but nothing like this, although I never pushed it this hard then either. My question remains: is the 3 tube radiator more efficient than the 4-tube, and therefore needing fewer tubes, or did LR just decide that the 4-tube was overkill and that a three tube design would suffice? Anyone else experience temp. changes when switching from 4-3 tube or back? Also folks, don't forget that I don't have a Rover engine. Pontiac 2.5l--driving excitement until you overheat. Thanks folks, Bill Rice ------------------------------[ <- Message 39 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980718 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Luis Manuel Gutierrez" <lgutierr@jccr.co.cr> Date: Fri, 17 Jul 1998 17:52:14 -0500 Subject: RE: RE: Freelander and defenders to US Could be. As Charles said, BMW is even running on diesels on Grand Touring class races. And they do very well, but it's a completely different task there. At least they have the technology to do well. The real outcome, thats another story. History will tell. Lic. LUIS MANUEL GUTIERREZ CHACON Jose Cartellone Construcciones Civiles S.A. E-mail: lgutierr@jccr.co.cr Tel: (506) 296 2743 Fax: (506) 296 2744 -----Mensaje original----- De: SPYDERS@aol.com <SPYDERS@aol.com> Para: lro@playground.sun.com <lro@playground.sun.com> Fecha: Viernes 17 de Julio de 1998 02:37 PM Asunto: Re: RE: Freelander and defenders to US >In a message dated 7/17/98 10:58:33 AM, you wrote: ><<A BMW diesel? >I doubt that would be a minus. >My experince with with BMW diesels tells me that those are incredible >engines. >Incredibly agile, and very powerfull, but when it comes to self repairing... >better get a PhD for it.>> >So, why'd LR take it out of the RR in favor of the VM from italy? >I doubt that would be a minus. Apparently >it was a good diesel in cars, but didn't take well to the RR... >--pat. >I doubt that would be a minus. >My experince with with BMW diesels tells me that those are incredible ------------------------------[ <- Message 40 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980718 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Russ Burns <burns@ismi.net> Date: Fri, 17 Jul 1998 21:06:42 -0400 Subject: Re: NAS Freelander Dr. Walter Hasselkus, I have to agree with Paul. I have three Landrovers, 1991 Range Rover, 1994 Defender 90, and a 1995 Defender 90 SW. As I am getting into the ranching business, I am looking at getting another vehicle to pull trailers, and haul feed. The best fit for me is a four door 1 ton diesel pickup. If Land Rover were to offer such a vehicle, based on the over-design it was famous for , instead of the "fuel efficent" (light weight) trucks available in the US, I would make Land Rover my choice. I have no use for a $60K truck that cannot be worked. Russ Burns At 07:29 PM 7/17/98 EDT, DONOHUEPE@aol.com wrote: >An Open Letter to: >Dr. Walter Hasselkus >Rover Group Chairman and Chief Executive >Solihull UK >Sehr Geehrte Herr Doktor Hasselkus: [ truncated by list-digester (was 34 lines)] >Denver Colorado >CC: The LRO Digest ------------------------------[ <- Message 41 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980718 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "d.h.lowe" <dhlowe@idirect.com> Date: Fri, 17 Jul 1998 10:08:41 -0400 Subject: Re: A Cloud?? of Rovers. How does a "Slick of Rovers " sound. Richard Marsden wrote: > All this talk of springs.... > A Wallow of Rovers? > Alan_Richer@motorcity2.lotus.com on 07/17/98 01:03:48 PM > Please respond to lro@playground.sun.com > To: lro@playground.sun.com [ truncated by list-digester (was 23 lines)] > A Menace of Rovers, maybe.....8*) > ajr ------------------------------[ <- Message 42 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980718 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "David and Cynthia Walker" <wahooadv@earthlink.net> Date: Fri, 17 Jul 1998 19:32:12 -0700 Subject: Re: Breather alternative Just to add - no water will get in the filter, even if they are underwater...... if you mount the hose to the carb side of the filter. I run the rear remote breather behind the OD, on the front side of the frame. Bill, I followed this the last time you posted it and wanted to compliment you on a great, simple, functional idea. Cheers David Full-time father of a 3.5 year old 1970 Land Rover IIA, 88" - "BEAN TOAD" S/V KALAKALA, Ingrid 38, ketch - our home wahooadv@earthlink.net ------------------------------[ <- Message 43 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980718 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: car4doc <car4doc@concentric.net> Date: Fri, 17 Jul 1998 21:51:07 -0500 Subject: Re: Hoisting the engine. Where to wrap chain or connect to engine? Hi All, Well I am sure I should know this but I will ask for advise anyway. I am doing a frame over on a 109 regular.(Dad's Toy) The new frame is rolling & I want to lift the old engine & trans in to the new frame from the old frame. I have new mounts ready & now I wonder if I can or should lift the engine & trans as a unit. Any one done this? Regards, Rob Davis_Chicago ------------------------------[ <- Message 44 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980718 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "David and Cynthia Walker" <wahooadv@earthlink.net> Date: Fri, 17 Jul 1998 19:48:56 -0700 Subject: LEAK Hey, I like these divergent comments every so often. It saves me from putting a Weber jetted, tuned Rochester carb on my LR. Does not quite leave enough time to drain the oil and install grease in my hubs - no time at all for lockers or V8 swaps. Without these questions, I would place my shoes on backwards (brake shoes) and wish I had a high performance, high MPG diesel for my LR. What do you guys think of high speed piston return springs? Heard they might help on the hill climbs :-) I like "Leak of Land Rovers" best the 5 - white 110's in Brazil would be a "Pod" however. Cheers David Full-time father of a 3.5 year old 1970 Land Rover IIA, 88" - "BEAN TOAD" S/V KALAKALA, Ingrid 38, ketch - our home wahooadv@earthlink.net ------------------------------[ <- Message 45 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980718 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Jeremy Bartlett <bartlett@slip.net> Date: Fri, 17 Jul 1998 21:29:23 -0700 Subject: Re: Re. Freelanders come to America Faure, Marin wrote: > waiting another 2-3 years to introduce it doesn't seem to make a lot of > sense. (snip) From a marketing perspective, I would think the time to be > putting the > Freelander in North American showrooms is now I agree with all you wrote but I think there's another perspective:Profit. Land Rover doesn't make that much money on the US market. Once you take the warranty costs into account (reputedly the highest of any market), LR's margin in the US is just that... marginal. So I suspect there's minimal pressure on LR to send a new vehicle to the US (not something they've ever really done). Imagine the problems (reputation and financial) they'd have if ramping up Freelander production led to the problems they had with the early NAS Discoveries. I suspect they've had some time to asess Freelander quality and are now willing to commit to the NAS market. This isn't too surprising as there were a number of people guessing that this kind of time frame would be when it would come to the US. I'm not terribly interested in the Freelander myself either, although I agree that it seems like LR is missing the peak of the US market. Jeremy ------------------------------[ <- Message 46 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980718 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: CIrvin1258@aol.com Date: Sat, 18 Jul 1998 02:39:48 EDT Subject: Re: Freelander and defenders to US I doubt very much, that Defender would be drastically changed from what it is now, simply because of military contracts: to completely change their design just for one market (not to mention, the risk of not doing very well), and possibly lose military contracts, could be disasterous! The only real fear, is price. LRNA knows all too well, that anything they bring into the U.S. market, will sell - it's just a matter of what WE are willing to pay. Warranties aren't so much of a problem to them, as are import tarriffs (which nearly double the selling prices from the outset) It's bad enough, they have to convert their U.K. selling prices into dollars (approx 1.65 times the U.K. selling price), but tarriffs can jack up the price that much more = used NAS D-110's for $40k plus (not so much because of the collectability factor)...I like D-110's very much, but I'm NOT paying that much for a used one! (and as I have refused to pay 5 figures on the list for a used RR, I got one for $8500) And I would NEVER (unless I hit the lottery - big time) pay more than $25 - 35k for a 130 Tdi no matter how badly I wanted one - IT IS NOT A RANGE ROVER! This is the problem they face, and not being forced by U.S. regs, to install side-mounted air bags, though the cost of doing that has stalled them. Add to that, the past history of BL, and their rep for selling junk in this market, and they can understandably be nervous. They have no fear of competition, because they know that they have a following here (it doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure this out, when their dealers are beginning to service Series trucks again, and half the perspective customers are asking "Can we see the model that has the tire sitting on the hood?"!), and they have had record sales here. Here in Los Angeles, I CANNOT go a single day, without seeing AT LEAST a dozen Discos, 5-10 Range Rovers, and 4-8 D-90's...it's just like the heyday of the Brit car invasion all over again! (and I live in a middle-class neighborhood) This, after just 4 years ago, when I could go a week, and the only MGB I'd see, was the one I was driving! But, they have to decide wether or not to commit to this market, and it appears they're going to give it the college try, and it's about bloody time! You gotta take your hats off to them for that. Charles P.S. Now...if only we could get Renault to import the Clio Williams, and Peugeot to sneak in a few 205 T16's... Naw...how 'bout a MG 6R4... ------------------------------[ <- Message 47 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980718 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Wolfe, Charles" <CWolfe@smdc.org> Date: Sat, 18 Jul 1998 01:36:30 -0500 Subject: Nissan LD28 diesels and other HP diesels in the states So my engine is out and I am getting ready to buy a turner. Got to top off the penny jar and finish rewiring and doing chassis maintanence. I read all those folks form across the ocean and below the equator who have replaced there 2.25 with high performance diesels. I wish I had the opportunity to check some out. Are there good diesel replacements that are easy to fit available in the states? What is this 5 bearing 2.5 diesel I hear about? Is the increased torque and hp and fuel efficiency worth the noise? Can you tolerate the dBs for eight hours of cruising at 60 - 65 mph? Is the Nissan availabe in the states and is it a good replacement? I am leaning toward the turner petrol because: it is a rover, it will bolt right in and it will be relatively quiet. However, I would like to hear the arguments for the use of a good diesel engine in a series vehicle here in the states, cwolfe ------------------------------[ <- Message 48 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980718 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: CIrvin1258@aol.com Date: Sat, 18 Jul 1998 02:46:46 EDT Subject: Re: Nissan LD28 diesels and other HP diesels in the states My .02 cents worth: I took my 109 diesel on a 2000-mile trip around Nevada last September, and the worst noise I got, was from my tires! To me, it's only noisier at idle: at speed, it sounds pretty much the same as a 2.25 petrol. Charles ------------------------------[ <- Message 49 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980718 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Tony Chapman <Tony@archap.demon.co.uk> Date: Thu, 16 Jul 1998 08:58:58 +0100 Subject: Re: New steering relay moves in the cross member In message <bulk.13044.19980713144031@Land-Rover.Team.Net>, David Hope <davidjhope@email.msn.com> writes >I recently checked over my steering components and noticed that there is >some play in the bottom of the steering relay. When I moved the wheels I >can see the base of the relay move from side to side. >The relay came from British Pacific and is fitted to an after market front >frame piece which came from DAP. I suppose that the hole in the relacement >frame piece is simply too large in diameter. Does anyone have ideas about [ truncated by list-digester (was 16 lines)] >David Hope >64 llA I have the same problem. My relay is a genuine LR product and is fitted to a new Marsland galvanised chassis. I tighten the bolts up every so often but over time the relay works loose. I'd be interested in any ideas on how to cure this. -- Tony Chapman ------------------------------[ <- Message 50 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980718 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
END OF * LIST DIGEST Input: messages 48 lines 2535 [forwarded 161 whitespace 0] Output: lines 1810 [content 1618 forwarded 99 (cut 62) whitespace 0][ First Message | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980718 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Digest Messages Copyright 1990-1999 by the original poster or/and Empire Rover Owners Society, All rights reserved. Photos & text Copyright 1990-1999 Bill Caloccia, All rights reserved. Empire/LRO List of charges for Empire/LRO Policies
against the distribution of unsolicited commercial e-mail (aka SPAM).
|
![]() |
|||
<--Back |
HOME |
TOP |
Forward --> |
|