[ First Message Last | Table of Contents | <- Digest -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Kathleen Hollington <kholling@nrn1.NRCan.gc.ca> Date: Thu, 9 Jul 1998 06:55:54 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Engine mount source? I unfortunately stripped the threads on on of the bolts on a brand new engine mount for my IIa. I moved it to the gearbox mount but I figure I'll have to change it (unless I can put a die on it and get some decent threads back on). Are there commonly available north american substitutes for these mounts, or are they specific to LR's? Thanks. -- Robert St-Louis -- OTTAWA/CANADA -- '68 IIA SWB LR -- kholling@nrn1.nrcan.gc.ca.NOSPAM (remove NOSPAM when replying) ------------------------------[ <- Message 2 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980710 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Kathleen Hollington <kholling@nrn1.NRCan.gc.ca> Date: Thu, 9 Jul 1998 06:59:47 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Any OVLR member with new wiring? I have a brand new wiring harness from British Pacific that I wish to install in my IIa (not much original wiring of any kind left in it), but I'm having a hard time figuring out what the different lenghts of wiring are, where to run what chunk through what hole, where to plug in the different connectors, etc. I have the schematics, some tip sheets from LR web sites, etc, but I'd like to see a LR which has had such a rewiring job, to give me ideas on getting started. Would any OVLR member in the Ottawa area have such a vehicle that I could take a look at sometime? Much appreciated, --Robert -- Robert St-Louis -- OTTAWA/CANADA -- '68 IIA SWB LR -- kholling@nrn1.nrcan.gc.ca.NOSPAM (remove NOSPAM when replying) ------------------------------[ <- Message 3 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980710 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Peter Goundry <peterg@aircast.com> Date: Thu, 9 Jul 1998 07:44:35 -0400 Subject: unsubscribe Unsubscribe lro-digest Cheers All, off to Billings tomorrow, with WCRC & R.O.V.E.R.S Peter Goundry 67 GS109" IIA, 73 Lightweight, 97 D90 #127 ------------------------------[ <- Message 4 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980710 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: TBache9248@aol.com Date: Thu, 9 Jul 1998 07:42:23 EDT Subject: No Subject ------------------------------[ <- Message 5 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980710 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Axel Pawlik <axelpawlik@tinet.ie> Date: Thu, 09 Jul 1998 11:19:29 +0100 Subject: Re: Fitting Seatbelts Adrian, >Easy to fit in a 109, where the inertia unit will fit between inside of >door post and tub bulkhead - but in an 88 the bulkhead sits 2½ inches >forward relative to a 109. >So where do I mount the inertia unit? How about on the other side of the >tub galvanised cross profile? I have fitted my new ones where the old ones (worn out) were, on "this side", forward, on the bulkhead. It sits just besides the backrest, the "flow" of the belt from inertia spool to shoulder bracket is not restrained. Seems to work fine. Only thing that's missing is the height adjustment :-) Axel ------------------------------[ <- Message 6 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980710 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: TBache9248@aol.com Date: Thu, 9 Jul 1998 07:49:55 EDT Subject: Alignment hi All, There is a very good reason to get your Rover pro-aligned. It is often called dogleg steering, crabbing, etc. "Set the toe and let 'er go" was long a motto, but not very good for back tires. You should get a 4 wheel alignment to established that both ends of the Rover are going in the same direction. Broken center bolts, springs, loose u-bolts all will allow the rear to track off-center. Not neccessary every year, but a good alignment on occasion will help spot troubles ahead and preserve expensive off-road tires. About the head with the broken bolt holes, if yours is an early S11 engine, I just may have a solid head that needs refurbishment for the cost of UPS, I also have a early short block that is going to the scrapper soon unless it is claimed and retrieved by the end of the month. Cleaning house. Tom Bache Avondale, PA ------------------------------[ <- Message 7 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980710 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Easton Trevor <Trevor_Easton@dofasco.ca> Date: Thu, 9 Jul 1998 08:42:00 -0400 Subject: More Whitworth -and springs and innuendo Reading a book about Gettyburg, I found out that the armies of the South used some Whitworth rifles. So this is the real reason they lost! (The Union troops had minie balls!!!!!) LR content. My new parabolics [ ;-) arrive tomorrow, any tips on installation? ------------------------------[ <- Message 8 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980710 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: TeriAnn Wakeman <twakeman@cruzers.com> Date: Thu, 9 Jul 98 06:51:14 -0700 Subject: Re: Broken Thermostat Housing--Do I Need a New Cylinder Head? >Tonight's work on the frame-off of my '60 SWB Petrol included removing the ;>outlet pipe from the cylinder head. I discovered that the front of the ;>cylinder head, where the third threaded hole is, was broken off some time in ;>the past twenty years or more since the vehicle was running. There is ;>slightly more than 50% of the threaded hole remaining, what with the front ;>half of the alloy surrounding the threaded hole missing. That sounds like an interesting story of a neophyte doing engine removal and replacement. <SNIP> ;> Should I just :>get another cylinder head and consider it well spent "peace of mind" money? :>Anybody have a fix they can recommend? Keith I would say check the head over VERY carefully for cracks & if it is crack free keep using it. You have the pressure of the coolant trying to push the parts off the block. Two bolts and two gaskets with a liberal coating RTV should more than be up to holding back 7 or 9 pounds of pressure. It has worked for you so far hasn't it?? Just don't over tighten the two remaining bolts. Cast iron is soft and threads are easily stripped. Then you will have to drill the holes out to the next size course thread and tap them. EXTRA CREDIT When you shave the head you will likely find interference between the back of the water pump housing and the front underside of the head. Check the clearance without the head gasket. A piece of light card board slid under the front of the head is what I use. If you do not have clearance, get a die grinder and cut some metal off the back of the water pump housing (You may want to drop a different head on the block one of these days). TeriAnn Wakeman The Green Rover, rebuilt and Santa Cruz, California and maintained using parts from twakeman@cruzers.com British Pacific 800-554-4133 http://www.cruzers.com/~twakeman Walk in harmony with the earth and all her creatures and you will create beauty wherever you go. ------------------------------[ <- Message 9 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980710 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Terje Krogdahl <tekr@nextel.no> Date: Thu, 9 Jul 1998 15:53:30 +0200 (MET DST) Subject: Re: front end alignment q's On Mon, 6 Jul 1998 Alan_Richer@motorcity2.lotus.com wrote: > There's only one alignment to set on a Rover - toe-in. This can be done Or toe-out, for the permanent 4WD crowd. The toe-in for the series Rovers is 1,2-2,4 mm (at least on SIII) measured at the horizontal centre-lin of the road wheels. I _think_ the same value applies for toe-out on the permanent 4WD vehicles. > with a tape measure, story stick, trammel points or any one of a dozen > different ways in your driveway. Easiest way is to have two pipes, one slightly thinner that fits inside the other one. Makes it (relatively) easy to find the difference. Terje Krogdahl Norwegian Land Rover Club http://www.land.rover.no 1972 SIII 88" 2.25 petrol ------------------------------[ <- Message 10 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980710 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Terje Krogdahl <tekr@nextel.no> Date: Thu, 9 Jul 1998 15:49:21 +0200 (MET DST) Subject: Re: Brake test lamp circuit On Mon, 6 Jul 1998, Adrian Redmond wrote: > An interesting explanation Terje! But the differential valve switch is > nylon, though there is a metal ball at the bottom which marries with the Interesting enough to be found on page 70-1 of the SIII Repair Operations Manual, Edition 4, part. no AKM3648 Here's an exact copy: ---------- --X----+ +---+ +---+ +----+ 3d |_._| |_._| |_._| | / 3a / 3b / 3c | | | | | gnd gnd gnd | | gnd --o \o--------------------+ 3d Description: 3. The warning light is in series circuit with one or more of the following warning indicator switches to provide a visual indication of brake lining wear, hydrauliv fluid leakage or servo vacuum loss, depending on the particular equipment provided on the vehicle:- a A servo mounted vacuum switch which indicates lack of vacuum assistance at the brake servo. b A pedal-box mounted pedal travel switch to give an indication of excess pedal travel caused by brake shoe wear or minor hydraulic leakage. c A chassis mounted pressure differential switch which indicates fluid leakage in the front or the rear brake hydraulic systems. d A dash mounted test switch which is push button operated. Failure of the bulb to illuminate on being tested could indicate a faulty bulb or earth connection. -------- > valve plunger - which itself "floats" in brake fluid - and the ball has > contact with the plunger all the time. So how does this switch make > contact to earth? This switch must be a normal switch, which makes > contact between both wires. No, it must not. If you consider the drawing of the valve on page 70-5, in section 70.15.41, BRAKE FAILURE SWITCH, Dual systems, overhaul, or even better, disassemble one, you'll find that the innermost part of the switch is indeed metal, and thus, it is grounded through the valve. The plunger runs through this metal part, and is grounded from it. If the (grounded) plunger is pushed into the switch, it makes contact with the dual connectors in the plastic part of the switch and grounds them. The plastic is there to make sure the connectors are not grounded all the time. Duh. I can't believe I actually typed the above description. I must have too much time on my hands today. And of course, I had the manual handy :-) Terje Krogdahl Norwegian Land Rover Club http://www.land.rover.no 1972 SIII 88" 2.25 petrol - thoroughly dissected and put back together ------------------------------[ <- Message 11 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980710 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Terje Krogdahl <tekr@nextel.no> Date: Thu, 9 Jul 1998 15:55:49 +0200 (MET DST) Subject: Re: Broken Thermostat Housing--Do I Need a New Cylinder Head? On Wed, 8 Jul 1998, Keith Cutler Family wrote: > I'd planned on reconditioning the cylinder head with new valve seats, a > shave to provide 8:1 compression, etc., but I'd hate to do that work if the > outlet pipe won't seal properly with 2 1/2 bolts worth of torque. I don't If only one bolt cannot be fitted, you may be able to get a good seal using two bolts and a generous amount of silicone on the joint surfaces. At least it has worked on my cylinder head for a year and a half now. Not exactly the recommended solution, but... Terje Krogdahl Norwegian Land Rover Club http://www.land.rover.no SIII 88" 2.25 petrol ------------------------------[ <- Message 12 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980710 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Lodelane@aol.com Date: Thu, 9 Jul 1998 11:15:49 EDT Subject: Re: More Whitworth -and springs and innuendo Much like "Puckell's Revenge", an early forerunner of the machine gun, developed by another Englishman. Had interchangable barrels. One barrel shot round balls to kill Christians and another cross shaped shot for infidels and heathens. Larry Smith Chester, VA ------------------------------[ <- Message 13 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980710 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "BROWN DAVID E (DAVE)" <debrown@srp.gov> Date: Thu, 9 Jul 1998 08:44:38 -0700 Subject: My experiences with BP Since everyone seems to be jumping on the bandwagon regarding BP, I thought I'd throw in my 2 cents... They have not only been some of the least expensive, but have probably the BEST customer service around ANYWHERE! I've had to have things shipped overnight, and they've done it happily. I've had to return parts, and they've done that happily. The latest item I priced with BP was a Mean Green high torque starter for my RR. I priced all the usual places, and found one that was $25 less than the next lowest price. Still pays to shop around... I think it was ECR that had the best price this time, it was on their www page as an Internet special. (Thanks to a tip from another list member!) I have had both good and not so good experiences with ordering overseas... 1st time was for around $2500 worth of miscellaneous "junk" for the various LR's, and it went perfectly! A small sum to customs, a small sum to the shipper (United airlines, I think) for paperwork (under $20) and that was it!!! My next overseas purchase was for a 4.6 short block, cam, and gaskets, and it also went well, but in addition to the usual customs fee, I had to pay $40 or so to a brokerage house. My most recent overseas purchase was for 2 axles (half shafts), some "lifting rings" clutch master and slave cylinder rebuild kits, brake adjuster cam repair kit, high output H4 bulbs, and a bonnet prop, (possibly a few more things, but not that much more). Not that large of an order, but I had to par over $100 to the importer broker. This pretty much wiped out any savings that I may have gained by ordering direct from the UK. I'd say, for large orders (get together in groups for one LARGE shipment) it's good to order from the UK. Otherwise, BP is usually the best price and always the best service! (And they have an "800" number!) Thanks for "listening" to my drivel... Dave Brown P.S. the "lifting rings" that I received were not the "D-ring" thing that mounts to the front bumper that I had expected... they were TINY little brackets with a hole in them that I presume attaches to the REAR bumper for lifting. No wonder they were such a great price!! Ah! You get what you pay for... but then, why pay more than you have to for the SAME thing??? ------------------------------[ <- Message 14 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980710 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Luis Manuel Gutierrez" <lgutierr@jccr.co.cr> Date: Thu, 9 Jul 1998 09:37:13 -0500 Subject: Brand New Range Rovers One of this days, as I was coming to the office (I wont say "to work") I decided to begin counting all the 1998 brand new Range Rovers I could find on my way. Its simply amazing. I was able to see 1.2 million dollars worth of rovers rolling around just on my way to the office. (This means 12 trucks, since they are worth something around 100.000 US$ with tax included). Is this number too high? I wish I had the money. ------------------------------[ <- Message 15 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980710 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Marc-Andre Leger <ma2@wefa.com> Date: Thu, 9 Jul 1998 11:50:43 -0400 Subject: RE: Brand New Range Rovers Now try counting Defenders... A D90 owner... / , | | /\ \|/ /\ | Marc-Andre Leger | |\\_;=._//| | Network Eng. | \." "./ | WEFA inc. | //^\ /^\\ | 800 Baldwin Tower | .'``",/ |0| |0| \,"``'. | Eddystone Pennsylvania | / , `'\.---./'` , \ | USA | /` /`\,."( )".,/`\ `\ | 19022 | /` ( '.'-.-'.' ) `\ | (610) 490-2763 | /"` "._ : _." `"\ | mailto:ma@wefa.com | `/.'`"=.,_``=``_,.="`'.\` | http://www.wefa.com | ) ( | http://www.leger.qc.ca | My roomate Tigger (the cat)|________________________| "Anyone who has never made a mistake has never tried anything new." Albert Einstein ------------------------------[ <- Message 16 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980710 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: M.J.Rooth@lboro.ac.uk (Mike Rooth) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 1998 16:49:52 +0000 Subject: Re: More Whitworth -and springs and innuendo >Much like "Puckell's Revenge", Sounds like a hardware version of Montezuma's Revenge.. Mike Rooth ------------------------------[ <- Message 17 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980710 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: MARCINKO3@aol.com Date: Thu, 9 Jul 1998 12:18:57 EDT Subject: Re: Brand New Range Rovers How about counting Discos that MEN are driving. ------------------------------[ <- Message 18 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980710 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Benjamin Smith <bens@psasolar.colltech.com> Date: Thu, 09 Jul 1998 11:22:18 -0500 Subject: Re: Brand New Range Rovers In message <bulk.9793.19980709091911@Land-Rover.Team.Net>you write: > How about counting Discos that MEN are driving. And your point is? I drove mine today. About 50% men, 50% women whenever I spot them in CA and in NJ. Ben -- Benjamin Smith "If I were running such a contest, I would Collective Technologies specifically eliminate any entries from Ben (a pencom company) involving driving the [Land] Rover anywhere. Land- : '72 Series III 88" He'd drive it up the Amazon Basin for a half -Rover: '94 Discovery 5-Spd can of Jolt and a stale cookie." --K. Archie ------------------------------[ <- Message 19 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980710 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: SPYDERS@aol.com Date: Thu, 9 Jul 1998 14:49:37 EDT Subject: Re: Brand New Range Rovers / M:F ratio In a message dated 7/9/98 12:21:32 PM, you wrote: >How about counting Discos that MEN are driving. Flamethrowers, ignite... ;-) We've seen a similar thread in the past, here's my useless .02: Here on Miami Beach, where the LR has a firm foothold as a toy/status thing (like Colorado ;-) ), on my daily walk from house to garage, I see on the street 2 D90s, 1 D90 SW, 1 RR (old body) & 1 4.6 HSE; that's before I start driving. Help, I'm surrounded... seriously, there are too many to even begin taking an interest in counting after I start driving around. All I have to do if I want to see 2 Discos and 3 RRs parked in a row is drive by the snooty deli or the fancy gym... I feel quite inconspicuous in the 110. I'd say the M:F ratio here on the beach is Defenders 5:1 (only seen 2 girls with them, and only one has my number :-( ) Discos 1:1 RRs 2:3 With child seats: Defenders 0% Discos 20-30% RRs 10% Now I pretty much look at every LR I see, whether parked or driving, and although not scientific, I'm pretty sure I'm not too far off for this community. --pat. ------------------------------[ <- Message 20 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980710 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Blair Gillespie" <blairg@fix.net> Date: Thu, 9 Jul 1998 13:43:54 -0700 Subject: LR Fraud - revisited List Members, After wading through some 2000 + messages that have piled up after the last couple of months I found this topic of some interest. I guess people are pretty fearless when sitting behind their computers. Writing things that if gone unnoticed will never be contested or refuted when not true. Doing business over the internet as well as doing it from opposite coasts does not make for an easy deal. It is true that I bought parts from Alex. We talked on the phone about the parts he had and what I wanted. I wanted the left wing, rear turn signals, and the plastic grill. The original part we talked about was the left wing. He said he wanted $150 for it. I thought it was a fair price and agreed sight unseen. I then called back later and added the plastic grill (SIII) and the rear turn signals for additional $55 . After a couple of days I sent the check of $150. I forgot that I had called back and asked for the additional parts.It also so happened that I addressed the envelope incorrectly and was returned back to me. I then sent it out again and was cashed by Alex. He then called and said that the check was for $150 and not for the total amount we had discussed. During this time I received the package from Alex. I sent him an email stating that I had received it and that the turn signals where broken during shipping. I still intended on paying the complete amount because of the fair price and he paid to ship the parts to me. I have a copy of the email I sent him with the time and date. After returning from vacation and some work related training we had a bunch of messages from him stating he wanted his money. Up until that point I thought he had been paid and sent an email that I thought it had been sent out and if it had not been I was going to send it. That was Sunday. On Monday I called my bank to see if it had cleared and it had not. I then sent a check . I called today to see if that check number had cleared and it did. During the last 11 years if owning Land Rovers I have bought, sold, traded, and given parts to people. Sometimes people have said that they were going to pay and have not, but for the most part things have gone well. I have also learned it is that the easiest way to send things is COD. So to make a short story long ,there was no LR FRAUD Alex got his money I got my parts and life goes on. Rover On, Blair ------------------------------[ <- Message 21 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980710 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: not_rrose@caltech.edu (Randy Rose) Date: Thu, 09 Jul 1998 20:49:03 GMT Subject: Re: 109 11" IIA brake ?'s Springs and adjusters- More?s On Mon, 6 Jul 1998 19:30:27 -0500, in mlist.lro you wrote: >I am trying to figure out how to put this brakes back together. Let me know if you still need help, as I am responding 2 days later. All spring should go on the inside, backing plate side of the shoes. I can pull out a set of used shoes and see if I can tell where the springs went. I can't tell you whick shoe is leading or trailing, as I have Series II type brakes with the adjuster at the bottom center. Shoe placement does make a difference for backing plates with front and read shoe adjusters. Randy If you E-mail me directly, remove the "not_" from the address ------------------------------[ <- Message 22 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980710 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: James Wolf <J.Wolf@worldnet.att.net> Date: Thu, 09 Jul 1998 17:52:53 Subject: water pump >Just curious, on the old SIII water pump, the fan hub is a square thing with >threaded bolt holes at the corners. In the rebuild kit, the hub is a disc >shaped piece instead. Bolt holes line up so it shouldn't be a problem putting >the fan on but I'm curious if SIII's (and late SIIa) originally had a square >fan hub. (My SII is a disc shaped hub but the pump housing is different and I >suspect things could have changed). >Nate >shaped piece instead. Bolt holes line up so it shouldn't be a problem My 1966 SIIa has the original water pump stuff in a box and it's square. The replacement kits that I have gotton over the years are also square. Hope this helps. Jim Wolf ------------------------------[ <- Message 23 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980710 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Faye and Peter Ogilvie <ogilvi@hgea.org> Date: Thu, 09 Jul 1998 12:05:08 Subject: Re: Horsepower I was messing around in http://www.cs.monash.edu.au/~lloyd/tildeLand-Rover/Engines/index.html#V8 and found some interesting facts on horspower ratings for various rover 4 cylinder engines. The 8 to 1 cr 2.25 has 81 horsepower while the 5 main engine which I thought was the same except for the bottom end only has 74 hp. Why would this be the case. Since I have 5 main bearing engine scheduled to go into my 109, I was hoping to have equal or greater horsepower than the 3 main engine it is replacing. What gives? The 2.5 gas engine claims 83 bhp while the N/A Diesel is 85 bhp. Strange that a diesel would have more horsepower than a gas engine especially since the diesel is not turbo charged. Anybody have any ideas why there are these seeming discrepancies on horspower outputs of the various engines. Aloha Peter ------------------------------[ <- Message 24 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980710 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: jimallen@onlinecol.com (Jim Allen) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 1998 15:16:49 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: Horsepower RE Horsepower; There are many ways to rate horsepower. The old 81hp figure was SAE Gross, which was a very generous interpretation. The later engines are rated to a more realistic SAE or DIN net. The 81 hp engine developes 65hp in a net rating scenario. The US switched over to SAE Net in '72 (look at '71 figures and then '72 and you will see a 15-25% drop at the stroke of a pen. Same engines - different tests. Jim Allen > I was messing around in >http://www.cs.monash.edu.au/~lloyd/tildeLand-Rover/Engines/index.html#V8 >and found some interesting facts on horspower ratings for various rover 4 >cylinder engines. > The 8 to 1 cr 2.25 has 81 horsepower while the 5 main engine which I >thought was the same except for the bottom end only has 74 hp. Why would >this be the case. Since I have 5 main bearing engine scheduled to go into [ truncated by list-digester (was 17 lines)] >horspower outputs of the various engines. >Aloha Peter ------------------------------[ <- Message 25 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980710 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Ian Vowles <Ian@modricusa.com> Date: Thu, 09 Jul 1998 17:28:59 -0600 Subject: Re: Original Paint Colors and Parabolic Springs Keith, Can you give me any details on how to contact Frank Jakos - I need to sort out all new springs / shocks / and wheels for my 66 SWB . I am in Pagosa Springs Colorado about 4 hours from Co Springs. Many thanks Ian Vowles At 10:06 AM 6/29/98 -0400, you wrote: > ---- you wrote: > ---- you wrote: >> My second question regards springs. My old ones are shot. Should I put on >> new LR 88" springs or non-original parabolics? >> new LR 88" springs or non-original parabolics? >I just returned from the Solihull Society Rally and had my first ride in a rover with Parabolic springs. I was very impressed with the ride on the pavement and the off-road action. The $ difference between parabolics and "regular" springs isn't a factor here in Colorado because shipping of "regular" springs will kill you and you can drive to Colorado Springs and buy your parabolics from Frank Jakos. Hope this helps. >I just returned from the Solihull Society Rally and had my first ride in a rover with Parabolic springs. I was very impressed with the ride on the pavement and the off-road action. The $ difference between parabolics and "regular" springs isn't a >Russ W. and the Pig >Russ W. and the Pig >Russ W. and the Pig >Russ W. and the Pig >Russ W. and the Pig >Russ W. and the Pig >Get free personalized email at http://email.lycos.com >Get free personalized email at http://email.lycos.com >Get free personalized email at http://email.lycos.com Ian Vowles, Modric<bold> </bold>Inc. National Headquarters, 86b Ranch Place, Pagosa Springs, Colorado 81147 , USA. Tel 970-731-4062 (1-800-739-0202) Email : Ian@modricusa.com Fax 970-731-4064 (1-800-813-2128) Email copy : Ian@modric.net ------------------------------[ <- Message 26 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980710 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: SPYDERS@aol.com Date: Thu, 9 Jul 1998 19:35:21 EDT Subject: Learning to drive in a LR Just came across this page. It is a story about a guy going offroad in Moab with Bill Burke & his tricked out D90 http://www.4x4now.com/bd0198.htm --pat. (MOAB=Must Order Another Bumper) ------------------------------[ <- Message 27 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980710 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: SPYDERS@aol.com Date: Thu, 9 Jul 1998 20:15:27 EDT Subject: Hammer Rivets (?) What are hammer rivets? How do they differ from normal (pop) rivets? Where on the body (the LR's body) are they used? I bought genuine bodycappings from LR, and on the same page of the parts book that the cappings were on, they listed rivets (an appropriate number below each steel part); so I went ahead and ordered the rivets, plus a few for extra. I get an e-mail from a former list member asking me if the person doing the replacement of the bodycappings is familiar with Hammer Rivets. I don't know, because the rivets I got from LR (Genuine LR Rivets, no less) look a hell of a lot like pop-rivets. Slightly lost here on my quest to replace body cappings. --pat. ------------------------------[ <- Message 28 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980710 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Jonathan Lee" <jonathan_lee@hrcc.on.ca> Date: Thu, 09 Jul 98 11:37:28 EST Subject: Re: Brand New Range Rovers Actually, very few people buy RRs. Nearly all of them are leased. What you saw represent about $12K a month in lease costs, not all that much when you think about it. ------------------------------[ <- Message 29 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980710 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "William L. Leacock" <wleacock@pipeline.com> Date: Thu, 09 Jul 1998 22:53:43 -0400 Subject: Injectors The nozzle valve must open at 135 atmospheres.when the proper spray pattern must be observed. Bill Leacock ( Limey in exile ) NY USA. 88 and 109 LR's and 89 RR ------------------------------[ <- Message 30 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980710 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "William L. Leacock" <wleacock@pipeline.com> Date: Thu, 09 Jul 1998 22:53:41 -0400 Subject: 6 cylinder Paul writes :- It remains a mystery why Land Rover did not produce a six cylinder version of the 2.286 four instead of destroking their much older, F head, 3 liter. They would then have had a decent 3.5 six which was just what the North American market needed. The 2.6 ( which is a 6 cyl based on the 1600 cc 4 cylinder ) was designed several years before the 3 litre which was based on the 2 litre 4 cylinder which preceded the 2.25 by a few years. Bill Leacock ( Limey in exile ) NY USA. 88 and 109 LR's and 89 RR ------------------------------[ <- Message 31 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980710 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: RoverNut@aol.com Date: Thu, 9 Jul 1998 22:55:07 EDT Subject: Re: LR Fraud - revisited As I mentioned in an earlier post to this list, Blair is correct, I eventually received the check on July 20th. It was for the correct amount and it did clear. Since it took over 90 days for me to receive it, I had accepted the fact that it was probably a lost cause and I would never receive my money, as many people would have under the circumstances when their phone calls were not returned. My post to the list had nothing to do with being "bold" behind the faceless internet, it was a heads-up to the list, not unlike ones that have saved me from making bad decisions in the past. I meant well. I think those who have known me as an active part of this list for the past 3 years would agree. I appologize to Blair once again for any remarks made construed as offensive and wish him the best. Sincerely, Alex Maiolo Hillsborough NC ------------------------------[ <- Message 32 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980710 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: jimfoo@uswest.net Date: Thu, 09 Jul 1998 21:15:34 -0700 Subject: Steamboat Rally & Bill Rice I have just finished adding some Steamboat Rally Pics and also a few of Bill Rice and I off road (for you OVLR people) to my web page. The address is: http://www.users.uswest.net/~jimfoo Jim Hall 1966 IIA 88" ------------------------------[ <- Message 33 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980710 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: MARCINKO3@aol.com Date: Fri, 10 Jul 1998 00:35:24 EDT Subject: Re: Brand New Range Rovers Sorry Ben, I have had two 96 Discos and two 97 Discos includeing an XD that was used in the Eco Challenge. I am a heavy off roader and these cars still stunn me with what they can do. However here in NC it seems that the ratiao of men to women Disco drivers is weighted to the other side. Didn't mean to step on any toes. Rover on... Steve Armada Off-Road LLC ------------------------------[ <- Message 34 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980710 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: David Scheidt <david@infocom.com> Date: Thu, 9 Jul 1998 23:39:41 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: Hammer Rivets (?) On Thu, 9 Jul 1998 SPYDERS@aol.com wrote: > What are hammer rivets? They are rivets which are deformed using a hammer and special die, instead of poping them in. I think they are sometimes called tinner's rivets. > Where on the body (the LR's body) are they used? On Series rovers, all over the place. Almost all the rivets on my IIA are tinners, the others are replacements. I don't know if there are any on that plushmobile of yours. Pop rivets are cheaper and much easier to install. David ------------------------------[ <- Message 35 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980710 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Terje Krogdahl <tekr@nextel.no> Date: Fri, 10 Jul 1998 10:10:05 +0200 (MET DST) Subject: Re: Brand New Range Rovers On Thu, 9 Jul 1998, Luis Manuel Gutierrez wrote: > trucks, since they are worth something around 100.000 US$ with tax If it's any comfort, a 4.6 HSE will set you back almost twice that amount here in Norway :-) Definitely including taxes... Terje Krogdahl Norwegian Land Rover Club http://www.land.rover.no 1972 SIII 88" 2.25 petrol ------------------------------[ <- Message 36 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980710 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Oliver_Gottlob@t-online.de (Oliver Gottlob) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 1998 08:29:53 +0100 Subject: Diesel Injectors Hello Martin, hello all, As far as I know the Pressure is 135 Bar (Sorry I´dont know this in PSI). But I think more importent is the spray pattern from the injectors. There must be a fine spray no drops coming from the injector. There are a small auxiliary and the main spray beam. bye Oli DG5DBV 1976 Landrover 109 Diesel (2,25l) "everyday transport" slow & smokey hpage: http://www.qsl.net/dg5dbv mailto:dg5dbv@qsl.net ------------------------------[ <- Message 37 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980710 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Saunders.Richard" <Richard.Saunders@haltoncollege.ac.uk> Date: Fri, 10 Jul 1998 09:49:22 +0100 Subject: RE: Hammer Rivets (?) Ar But Ar but Ar etc The Landrover pop rivets are very special as the blind end is capped off. This stops water entering down the stalk hole and thus entering the inside of the body of your LR and also stops the stub end of the stalk from dropping out and making mess etc. Hammer rivets require a set of rivet snap, these are used to form the head shape and require skill to make a neat job, that is why most people use pop rivets. Richard Saunders UK ------------------------------[ <- Message 38 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980710 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: M.J.Rooth@lboro.ac.uk (Mike Rooth) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 1998 10:58:19 +0000 Subject: RE: Hammer Rivets (?) >Hammer rivets require a set of rivet snap, these are used to form the head >shape and require skill to make a neat job, The rivets referred to are available in snap head & countersunk form, and in iron,aluminium,copper and brass (although these days,regrettably not *easily* available).Those used on the Land Rover are snapheads,the advantage of this type of rivet being that it can be removed with a cold chisel,by means of chiselling the round head off,and punching the rivet body out of the hole.A countersunk has to be drilled out. As used on the Rover,the head is *outside*,and is held in place by the snap,or dolly.This resembles a pin punch,with a hemispherical depression in its head (dont we all know the feeling?),and is used to preserve the shape of the head,while committing assault and battery on the other end with a ball pein hammer.Should you wish to form another snaphead on the other end,you will,of course need another snap,but only to finish off. If you look inside the rear end of a series hardtop roof,Land Rover didnt trouble themselves to finish off with any neat sort of head,just so long as the rivet was swelled enough in the hole to hold the joint tight. The technique is easy enough to learn.A dolly can be made by turning up a large "pin punch" in ordinary mild steel,countersinking (using a twist drill) a depression in the head,then whacking a suitable sized steel ball bearing into the hole,until the hole assumes a suitable shape. This will be the dolly.A snap is usually like unto it,but hardened. The hole should be *just* clearance,and when using,say, a 1/8" snaphead iron rivet,I usually cut the shank off so that about 3/16" sticks out on the inside.The head is rested in the dolly,and using the ball pein of the hammer(and in this case,with the dolly in the bench vice) the protruding shank is systematically clouted round the periphery of the shank,so that not only does the rivet swell into the hole,the head you are forming assumes the correct domed shape.You dont need a huge hammer,but conversely you dont need one that is too small,either.The weight of the hammer itself should do most of the damage.The job is then finished off by putting the snap over your rough(ish) domed shape and walloping it a time or two,until you've got the best finish you can get. The alternative is to countersink the hole,leave somewhat less of the shank sticking out,and hammer the shank into the countersink, still using the ball pein,then carefully filing over the job.An iron rivet in mild steel should then be invisible. To ensure that the two pieces of metal you are joining are closed well up,a rivet set will be used.This is yet another "pin punch" affair,but this time with a hole in the business end,clearance for the rivet shank.With the head in the dolly,the set is placed over the shank,and given a sharp blow with the hammer,effectively closing up the two pieces of metal to be joined. The problem with all this (and I have to say that I find rivetting a highly satisfying job on a model) is that as described,the work pieces are small enough to be held.On a large job,however,the dolly has to be held on the head somehow,by one operative,while another person works on the other end.How this could be achieved is problematic, to say the least.One possibility *may* be to hold the dolly in the chuck of an electric drill(not connected to the supply) to obtain sufficient constant pressure on the head to hold it in place,while the other bloke wallops the bejeezus out of the business end.After all,with an alloy rivet,the hammer blows dont need to be of Jawn Henry proportions.And if you arent bothered too much about the shape of the rivet inside,I cant see why this shouldnt work.(Bet someone else can though:-)) Pop rivets are certainly much easier. And if I'm teaching Granny to suck eggs,my apologies. Cheers Mike Rooth ------------------------------[ <- Message 39 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980710 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
END OF * LIST DIGEST Input: messages 38 lines 1596 [forwarded 81 whitespace 0] Output: lines 1141 [content 951 forwarded 72 (cut 9) whitespace 0][ First Message | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980710 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Digest Messages Copyright 1990-1999 by the original poster or/and Empire Rover Owners Society, All rights reserved. Photos & text Copyright 1990-1999 Bill Caloccia, All rights reserved. Empire/LRO List of charges for Empire/LRO Policies
against the distribution of unsolicited commercial e-mail (aka SPAM).
|
![]() |
|||
<--Back |
HOME |
TOP |
Forward --> |
|