[ First Message Last | Table of Contents | <- Digest -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
msg | Sender | lines | Subject |
1 | eheite@dmv.com (Ned Heit | 20 | annoying rattles |
2 | Elwyn York [Elwyny@mails | 12 | Re: Join |
3 | Loz [Loz@loz.softnet.co. | 24 | Re: SIII brake woes |
4 | ecrover@midcoast.com (Mi | 20 | 107 SW wanted |
5 | "Huub Pennings" [hps@fs1 | 27 | Springs-Rebuilding |
6 | Alan_Richer@motorcity2.l | 10 | Re: Springs-Rebuilding |
7 | FOSTERLOHR [FOSTERLOHR@a | 20 | RE: Stage One V8 Exhaust Manifold |
8 | gruno@att.net.hk (Keith | 20 | Re: Rag tops |
9 | debrown@srp.gov | 30 | Re: Chewy bits in gearbox |
10 | "Peter Hope" [shdwrvr@er | 17 | Series Vehicles in Hawai'i? |
11 | M.J.Rooth@lboro.ac.uk (M | 13 | Re: Rag tops |
12 | dbobeck@inetgate.ushmm.o | 17 | Re: Impending journey |
13 | Loz [Loz@loz.softnet.co. | 23 | Re: Parabolic Springs! |
14 | Loz [Loz@loz.softnet.co. | 18 | Re: Join |
15 | Thomas Spoto [tspoto@az. | 66 | Re: Join |
16 | Thomas Spoto [tspoto@az. | 13 | Re: Join |
17 | "james howington" [jphow | 40 | Re: Join |
18 | ivosloo@cs.up.ac.za | 24 | Re: 88" and sideshafts after 1980 |
19 | Steve Fullwood [ansdf@TT | 22 | GUNK |
20 | Alan_Richer@motorcity2.l | 38 | Re: GUNK |
21 | Paul Quin [Paul_Quin@pml | 25 | RE: GUNK |
22 | Loz [Loz@loz.softnet.co. | 27 | Re: GUNK |
23 | Frankelson [Frankelson@a | 19 | Re: Parabolic Springs! |
24 | Frankelson [Frankelson@a | 20 | Re: Stage One V8 Exhaust Manifold |
25 | Frankelson [Frankelson@a | 27 | Re: GUNK |
26 | Alan_Richer@motorcity2.l | 14 | Re: GUNK |
27 | SPYDERS [SPYDERS@aol.com | 26 | Re: GUNK |
28 | Rick Grant [rgrant@cadvi | 28 | Re: GUNK |
29 | SPYDERS [SPYDERS@aol.com | 22 | Re: Simple Green |
30 | "\"Mr. Mike\" Passaretti | 22 | Door top (and bottom) treatments... |
31 | SPYDERS [SPYDERS@aol.com | 19 | Defender : Human ratio |
32 | Scott Wilson [swilson@sc | 36 | RE: Simple Green |
33 | Wayne Haight [whaight@ha | 28 | Re: Defender : Human ratio |
34 | "William L. Leacock" [wl | 11 | Chewy bits |
35 | "William L. Leacock" [wl | 21 | Whining sound |
36 | "Peter M. Kaskan" [pmk11 | 16 | Removing Al Spot Welds |
37 | Frankelson [Frankelson@a | 19 | Re: GUNK |
38 | Paul Quin [Paul_Quin@pml | 11 | RE: Removing Al Spot Welds |
39 | gruno@att.net.hk (Keith | 27 | Re: Rag tops |
40 | Rick Grant [rgrant@cadvi | 29 | Re: GUNK |
41 | gruno@att.net.hk (Keith | 23 | Re: GUNK |
42 | "Luis Gutierrez" [lgutie | 18 | I prefer LRs to PCs |
43 | Frankelson [Frankelson@a | 18 | Re: Defender : Human ratio |
44 | SPYDERS [SPYDERS@aol.com | 17 | Not an LR, probably a Gypsy... |
45 | Frankelson [Frankelson@a | 18 | Re: GUNK |
46 | Frankelson [Frankelson@a | 19 | Re: I prefer LRs to PCs |
47 | Cameron Sear [cameron.se | 15 | High Strung... |
48 | Frankelson [Frankelson@a | 18 | Re: High Strung... |
49 | "Luis Gutierrez" [lgutie | 37 | Re: I prefer LRs to PCs |
50 | "John C. Hinkle" [defend | 8 | Re: High Strung... |
51 | "Ben Brand" [ben_brand@h | 5 | unsubscribe |
52 | SPYDERS [SPYDERS@aol.com | 24 | Re: High Strung... |
53 | Huw Jones [desrads@btint | 13 | s3 brake woes |
54 | "Mark Talbot" [rangerove | 19 | Weekend off-road in NH and VT |
55 | "Art Bitterman" [artbitt | 43 | update on paint job |
56 | "K. John Wood" [jwrover@ | 22 | Re: Impending journey |
57 | "MARY THOMSON" [denthoms | 41 | Re: the saga continues |
58 | "MARY THOMSON" [denthoms | 19 | Re: I prefer LRs to PCs |
59 | Russ Wilson [rwilson@usa | 17 | Re: update on paint job |
60 | Jarvis 64 [Jarvis64@aol. | 18 | Re: Simple Green |
61 | Jarvis 64 [Jarvis64@aol. | 22 | squeaky brakes |
62 | David Cockey [dcockey@ti | 17 | Re: Removing Al Spot Welds |
63 | David Cockey [dcockey@ti | 23 | Re: High Strung... |
64 | Rick Grant [rgrant@cadvi | 24 | Re: squeaky brakes |
65 | "d.h.lowe" [dhlowe@idire | 36 | Re: Stage One V8 Exhaust Manifold |
66 | "=?iso-8859-1?Q?Bj=F8rnu | 19 | Re: High Strung... |
67 | gruno@att.net.hk (Keith | 24 | Re: update on paint job |
68 | Frankelson [Frankelson@a | 16 | Re: I prefer LRs to PCs |
69 | Frankelson [Frankelson@a | 22 | Re: update on paint job |
70 | M.J.Rooth@lboro.ac.uk (M | 12 | Re: 88" and sideshafts after 1980 |
From: eheite@dmv.com (Ned Heite) Date: Wed, 20 May 1998 07:26:28 -0500 Subject: annoying rattles Adrian Redmond wrote: >travelling between 70 and 85 kph, otherwise quiet as a bell. Quiet as a bell, eh? Driving 70-85 kph? What were you driving? Thought you were an all-Rover fleet. Check the badge. _____ ___(_____) |Baby the\ |1969 Land\_===__ | ___Rover ___|o |_/ . \______/ . || ___\_/________\_/____________________________________________ Ned Heite, Camden, DE http://home.dmv.com/~eheite/index.html ------------------------------[ <- Message 2 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980521 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Elwyn York <Elwyny@mailshuttle.com> Date: Wed, 20 May 1998 12:22:25 +0100 Subject: Re: Join At 09:18 20/05/98 +0200, you wrote: >Join Well Said EY ------------------------------[ <- Message 3 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980521 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Loz <Loz@loz.softnet.co.uk> Date: Wed, 20 May 1998 11:15:19 +0100 Subject: Re: SIII brake woes I'd also give the whole system a thorough inch by inch check. I had a similar problem once, traced it eventually to a tiny, I mean tiny, crack in one of the pipes. Loz Terje Krogdahl wrote: > On Wed, 20 May 1998, jkramer wrote: > > > I suspect the problem could be in the master cylinder, but can the > > > master cylinder be faulty without leaking? > > It sure can! The presure can leak back into the container (tank) at the > > master cylinder.I've had some trouble with this. > Ugh. I guess it's master cylinder overhaul time again... Was afraid > of that. [ truncated by list-digester (was 21 lines)] > http://www.land.rover.no > 1972 SIII 88" 2.25 petrol ------------------------------[ <- Message 4 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980521 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: ecrover@midcoast.com (Mike Smith) Date: Wed, 20 May 1998 09:22:31 -0400 Subject: 107 SW wanted Dear all, I am looking for a 107 Station Wagon project for restoration. As original as possible, left hand drive would be nice, but knowing that they are hard to find I'm not going to be too picky. If anyone can point me in the right direction, or has one for sale I'd appreciate an email. Email me direct please as I am not on the list. Thanks, and have a great day! From: EAST COAST ROVER CO. *Land Rover and Vintage 4X4 Specialists* 21 Tolman Road, Warren, ME (USA) 04864 207.594.8086 phone 207.594.8120 fax http://www.eastcoastrover.com ------------------------------[ <- Message 5 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980521 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Huub Pennings" <hps@fs1-kfih.azr.nl> Date: Wed, 20 May 1998 16:44:49 +0100 Subject: Springs-Rebuilding Hello all, Is there anyone out there who can shed some light on the rebuilding feasability of petrol springs up to diesel standerds?? In my rebuilding process I have got two front springsets available, one diesel, heavily rusted (11 layers), and one petrol set(nine layers) in good shape. Since I am rebuilding with the diesel engine I am wondering if I could "improve" the petrol set by adding extra spring blades. Should I add long or short ones, inbetween, under or ontop of the petrol blades? Regards, Huub Pennings e-mail adress Pennings@kfih.azr.nl ------------------------------[ <- Message 6 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980521 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Alan_Richer@motorcity2.lotus.com Date: Wed, 20 May 1998 10:50:59 -0400 Subject: Re: Springs-Rebuilding Seems to me that just adding 2 to fit from the Diesel stack would carry the mail here.... Alan ------------------------------[ <- Message 7 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980521 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: FOSTERLOHR <FOSTERLOHR@aol.com> Date: Wed, 20 May 1998 11:24:13 EDT Subject: RE: Stage One V8 Exhaust Manifold I'm in need of a new (Right Hand) Exhaust manifold for my Stage One V8 109. Mine's cracked and the Rover# is ERC2995. The problem is that nobody has any record of that number existing. The engine is a non-detoxed version, so just about anything should work. I'm looking for an inexpensive (I hope) solution to my problem. Has anybody had any luck with using a Buick manifold on the Rover V8? Regards, Ted Lohr Reply to: FOSTERLOHR@AOL.COM Ex-Saudi Stage One v8 109 ------------------------------[ <- Message 8 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980521 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: gruno@att.net.hk (Keith Addison) Date: Wed, 20 May 1998 23:29:07 +0800 (HKT) Subject: Re: Rag tops Hi Frank >Dunno why we loves 'em. but we loves 'em. Yes, we does, dammit. Or love/hate, with a near-equal passion... I have to be careful what I say, she's parked just outside the open door 10 ft away and might hear, but I know she can't read. All best Keith Lantau Island Hong Kong 1973 Series III Military Lightweight ------------------------------[ <- Message 9 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980521 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: debrown@srp.gov Date: 20 May 98 08:38:15 MST Subject: Re: Chewy bits in gearbox From: David Brown - Graphics Specialist ~SRP~ E-mail: debrown@srp.gov PAB219 (602)236-3544 - Pager:6486 External (602)275-2508 #6486 Pers. E-mail: rovernut@hotmail.com Lloyd, Maybe if you used something thin, like atf (Automatic Transmission Fluid) and filled it to the top, shook, rattled, rotated, etc... you may bet most of it. But sure as Murphy, (Murphey's law - a "guarantee" of sorts!) there'll be that one bit that is stuck in a corner, the one that will decide to come loose and chew things up at the least opportune moment! What are the chewy bits a part of? Don't you want to replace this part??? Don't you have to open it up anyway to replace it? Unless you're just going to try passing it off to some unsuspecting poor soul, I wouldn't do it. And if this *is* your plan... have you heard of bad charma??? Dave Brown Never give up your life for #=======# _____l___ anything that death can take |__|__|__\___ //__|__|__\___ away. -annonymous __\ _ | _| | |_ |} \__ - ____ - _|} O---O "(_)""""""(_)" (_) (_) ------------------------------[ <- Message 10 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980521 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Peter Hope" <shdwrvr@erols.com> Date: Wed, 20 May 1998 11:40:45 -0400 Subject: Series Vehicles in Hawai'i? Greetings, We have just been notified of a pending move to Hawai'i (SO is USN) and I was wondering if any on the list are on Ohau? I have heard horror stories about vehicle rust ont he islands and was wondering if the are any series vehicles wandering about in paradise. If so do they come for sale often? Any tips on where to look on the web for 4xvehicles for sale in HI (other then yahoo)? We should be arriving sometime in September. Many Thnaks Pete Hope ps. Anyone got a house w/garage for rent near Pearl? ------------------------------[ <- Message 11 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980521 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: M.J.Rooth@lboro.ac.uk (Mike Rooth) Date: Wed, 20 May 1998 16:45:36 +0000 Subject: Re: Rag tops I have to >be careful what I say, she's parked just outside the open door 10 ft away >and might hear, but I know she can't read. Want to bet? Nigel's Disease has many transmogrifications......... Mike Rooth ------------------------------[ <- Message 12 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980521 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: dbobeck@inetgate.ushmm.org Date: Wed, 20 May 98 11:19:32 EST Subject: Re: Impending journey >>19-21 June: OVLR Bday Party see ya there >>9 July: NJ to Wash. D.C. we can hit the happening spots in DC and get you good and hung over for your journey south... later DaveB ------------------------------[ <- Message 13 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980521 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Loz <Loz@loz.softnet.co.uk> Date: Wed, 20 May 1998 13:19:51 +0100 Subject: Re: Parabolic Springs! Anybody know of a UK supplier (and price) of these. Sounds like I gotta have some!!! Loz Frankelson wrote: > In a message dated 18/05/98 15:44:53, you write: > << Call me a softie, but for my money parabolics are the way to go. >> > alright, yer a softie...... :-)> > A friend of mine has parabolics and swears by them rather than at them as with > the old style. I've driven in it (Ser 11) and it's at least as pleasant as my > own 110 with HD coils. [ truncated by list-digester (was 14 lines)] > best cheers > Frank ------------------------------[ <- Message 14 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980521 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
[digester: Removing section of: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------EEBC2984AEF64F23386CDAEF" ] From: Loz <Loz@loz.softnet.co.uk> Date: Wed, 20 May 1998 13:23:37 +0100 Subject: Re: Join What? Elwyn York wrote: > At 09:18 20/05/98 +0200, you wrote: > >Join > Well Said > EY --------------EEBC2984AEF64F23386CDAEF [ Original post was HTML ] [digester: Removing section of: Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii ] ------------------------------[ <- Message 15 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980521 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Thomas Spoto <tspoto@az.com> Date: Wed, 20 May 1998 09:27:43 -0700 Subject: Re: Join -I pasted this in for you to read. To get it I addressed to: majordomo@land-rover.team.net Luck. >>>> info **** info: unknown list ''. >>>> info **** Help for Majordomo: This is Brent Chapman's "Majordomo" mailing list manager, version 1.93. In the description below items contained in []'s are optional. When providing the item, do not include the []'s around it. It understands the following commands: subscribe <list> [<address>] Subscribe yourself (or <address> if specified) to the named <list>. unsubscribe <list> [<address>] Unsubscribe yourself (or <address> if specified) from the named <list>. get <list> <filename> Get a file related to <list>. index <list> Return an index of files you can "get" for <list>. which [<address>] Find out which lists you (or <address> if specified) are on. who <list> Find out who is on the named <list>. info <list> Retrieve the general introductory information for the named <list>. lists Show the lists served by this Majordomo server. help Retrieve this message. end Stop processing commands (useful if your mailer adds a signature). Commands should be sent in the body of an email message to "Majordomo". Commands in the "Subject:" line NOT processed. If you have any questions or problems, please contact "Majordomo-Owner". Charles Kerr wrote: > Join ------------------------------[ <- Message 16 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980521 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Thomas Spoto <tspoto@az.com> Date: Wed, 20 May 1998 09:28:56 -0700 Subject: Re: Join My apologies to the list my previous sending should have gone to only one. Tom Spoto Charles Kerr wrote: > Join ------------------------------[ <- Message 17 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980521 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "james howington" <jphowington@hotmail.com> Date: Wed, 20 May 1998 09:30:47 PDT Subject: Re: Join >From owner-lro@playground.sun.com Wed May 20 09:27:33 1998 >Received: from localhost (daemon@localhost) > by playground.sun.com (8.9.0+Sun/8.9.0) with SMTP id JAA22829; > Wed, 20 May 1998 09:25:30 -0700 (PDT) >Received: by Land-Rover.Team.Net (bulk_mailer v1.3); Wed, 20 May 1998 09:25:26 -0700 >Date: Wed, 20 May 1998 09:27:43 -0700 >From: Thomas Spoto <tspoto@az.com> >Reply-To: lro@playground.sun.com >To: lro@playground.sun.com >X-To: lro@playground.sun.com >Subject: Re: Join >Message-ID: <bulk.22814.19980520092526@Land-Rover.Team.Net> [ truncated by list-digester (was 58 lines)] > end > Stop processing commands (useful if your mailer adds a signature). >Commands should be sent in the body of an email message to >"Majordomo". >Commands in the "Subject:" line NOT processed. >If you have any questions or problems, please contact >"Majordomo-Owner". >Subject: Re: Join >Message-ID: <bulk.22814.19980520092526@Land-Rover.Team.Net> [ truncated by list-digester (was 15 lines)] >> Join >> ** 'lro' mailing list information from 'majordomo@Land-Rover.Team.Net' > ** 'lro' mailing list information from >"Majordomo". 'majordomo@Land-Rover.Team.Net' > ** 'lro' mailing list information from thank you ------------------------------[ <- Message 18 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980521 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: ivosloo@cs.up.ac.za Date: Wed, 20 May 1998 18:42:03 +0000 Subject: Re: 88" and sideshafts after 1980 Mike, > >I would like to know what the experiences of you people are with > these > >sideshafts. If they really are stronger, they seem to be the > easiest > >way to cure any SII or SIII88" sideshaft problems... > I rather suspect that that was when they altered the number of > splines [ truncated by list-digester (was 10 lines)] > anything > earlier. the story I was told was that they only changed the number of splines on the outside - which is easy to handle: just put new flanges on. - Iwan Vosloo ( 1975 SIII 88" Diesel ) ------------------------------[ <- Message 19 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980521 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Steve Fullwood <ansdf@TTACS.TTU.EDU> Date: Wed, 20 May 1998 12:13:05 -0500 Subject: GUNK All, I know that rovers are supposed to have oil and grease all over. But I was wondering what the best safe degreasing agent? I have about 1/2-3/4 inch of 18 year old grease and dir on the engine and tranny. Also if I use a high pressure sprayer can water enter where the shifter forks enter the transmission? The gunk is impeding the movement of the lever. Also on the cleaning of the transmission with desiel can you do the diffs and the axles also? What are the drawbacks to the desiel cleaning. Should I flush with alot of EP90? Thanks in advance. Steve Fullwood 61' SII/IIA 88" Basic Lubbock, Texas ------------------------------[ <- Message 20 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980521 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Alan_Richer@motorcity2.lotus.com Date: Wed, 20 May 1998 13:02:59 -0400 Subject: Re: GUNK Re: Degreasing: My own favorite is a water-soluble degreaser (a la Simple Green) in a spray bottle , kept WELL AWAY from aluminum, and a long-handled stiff bristle brush. Remove bonnet - remove high-tension leads and bag over the carburettor and the distributor. Spray the crap out of the engine with the degreaser and work it into the scunge with the brush. Hose it off with a strong jet of water. Lather. Rinse. Repeat. I'm not thrilled with pressure washers - they take off paint and that water jet can get places you do NOT want it. The scrub brush and degreaser method's more labor-intensiver but easier on the car and the Universe in general. Re: Internal flushing: Unless you've got problems just change the oil - if you warm up the assembly (tranny and the like) first it'll take the vast majority of the gunk with it. If this is part of a resto. I'd consider dropping the diffs and looking inside the casings. The seals are most-likely bad anyway - change 'em and swab out the inside of the casings at the same time. With the tranny, change the gasket at the bottom of the transfer case and clean it out at the same time. If the tranny plug's not full of shavings, odds are the inside of the transmission's OK too. Refill it , run it awhile, then refill it again. That'll clear it fine. aj"Anal-retentive, ME?"r ------------------------------[ <- Message 21 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980521 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Paul Quin <Paul_Quin@pml.com> Date: Wed, 20 May 1998 10:05:21 -0700 Subject: RE: GUNK The best cleaning agent that I have used is high pressure _steam_ . Not to be confused with just a high pressure water wash. A good professional steam cleaning will remove all of the gunk and is about as environmentally friendly as you can get as it just uses good old H2O. Steam cleaning also has the added benefit of drying almost as soon as it hits the metal, leaving your undersides clean and dry. I've tried most of the heavy duty degreasers in a can or bottle with about the same results, they all seam to remove most of the grease but leave a film of slime behind. My 2¢ worth... Paul Quin 1961 Series II 88 http://www.geocities.com/MotorCity/Garage/4954/ Victoria, BC Canada ------------------------------[ <- Message 22 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980521 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Loz <Loz@loz.softnet.co.uk> Date: Wed, 20 May 1998 18:18:26 +0100 Subject: Re: GUNK For what it's worth, there is a product in the UK for removing this stuff, perhaps the same stuff is available on the other side of the pond? Ironically it's called "GUNK". Accompanied with a strong hose jet, it should get rid of most of the crap. Regards Loz Steve Fullwood wrote: > All, > I know that rovers are supposed to have oil and grease all over. But I was > wondering what the best safe degreasing agent? I have about 1/2-3/4 inch > of 18 year old grease and dir on the engine and tranny. Also if I use a > high pressure sprayer can water enter where the shifter forks enter the > transmission? The gunk is impeding the movement of the lever. Also on the > cleaning of the transmission with desiel can you do the diffs and the axles [ truncated by list-digester (was 17 lines)] > 61' SII/IIA 88" Basic > Lubbock, Texas ------------------------------[ <- Message 23 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980521 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Frankelson <Frankelson@aol.com> Date: Wed, 20 May 1998 13:48:42 EDT Subject: Re: Parabolic Springs! In a message dated 20/05/98 17:06:49, you write: << Anybody know of a UK supplier (and price) of these. Sounds like I gotta have some!!! Loz >> it's Chris Perfect Components, Tel/Fax 01570 423206. best cheers Frank ------------------------------[ <- Message 24 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980521 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Frankelson <Frankelson@aol.com> Date: Wed, 20 May 1998 13:48:35 EDT Subject: Re: Stage One V8 Exhaust Manifold In a message dated 20/05/98 16:27:02, you write: << 'm in need of a new (Right Hand) Exhaust manifold for my Stage One V8 109. Mine's cracked and the Rover# is ERC2995. The problem is that nobody has any record of that number existing. >> Ted, I've got part no ERC 7174 for left hand drive (ERC 7176 right hand drive) in my parts book. Try your dealer on that. best cheers Frank ------------------------------[ <- Message 25 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980521 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Frankelson <Frankelson@aol.com> Date: Wed, 20 May 1998 13:48:44 EDT Subject: Re: GUNK In a message dated 20/05/98 17:58:34, you write: << know that rovers are supposed to have oil and grease all over. But I was wondering what the best safe degreasing agent? I have about 1/2-3/4 inch of 18 year old grease and dir on the engine and tranny. Also if I use a high pressure sprayer can water enter where the shifter forks enter the transmission? The gunk is impeding the movement of the lever. Also on the cleaning of the transmission with desiel can you do the diffs and the axles also? What are the drawbacks to the desiel cleaning. Should I flush with alot of EP90? Thanks in advance. >> Talk about coincidence. In the Uk we use a degreaser called 'Gunk' (!) spray or brush it on, leave fifteen mins then wash off with ordinary hose. You MUST have a similar product in the States, surely?? best cheers Frank ------------------------------[ <- Message 26 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980521 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Alan_Richer@motorcity2.lotus.com Date: Wed, 20 May 1998 13:46:23 -0400 Subject: Re: GUNK The spray-can stuff called GUNK is basically Diesel in a spray can. I've never had a lot of luck with it - it tends to leave the "slime" on parts as an earlir poster mentioned. To each his own, though - if you've had good luck with it more power to you. ajr ------------------------------[ <- Message 27 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980521 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: SPYDERS <SPYDERS@aol.com> Date: Wed, 20 May 1998 14:17:44 EDT Subject: Re: GUNK In a message dated 5/20/98 1:51:17 PM, you wrote: >The spray-can stuff called GUNK is basically Diesel in a spray can. I've >never had a lot of luck with it - it tends to leave the "slime" on parts as >an earlir poster mentioned. In the Philippines, where anything-in-a-can-except-for-spam(tm) is expensive, the service station attendants sponge diesel fuel over the engine and bay, followed by * real steam*; it seemed to work good, without leaving slime or film on the surface. The problem is in finding steam, many confuse hot pressure washers for steam... also, I've only seen this procedure done on diesel engined vehicles... Gunk's "Engine-Brite" ought to be findable at most auto parts places and even in some supermarkets' auto sections. I haven't had good results with it on rough aluminum castings like tranny, x-fer case... but it worked ok on the (painted) engine block. pat 93 110 ------------------------------[ <- Message 28 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980521 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Rick Grant <rgrant@cadvision.com> Date: Wed, 20 May 1998 12:20:41 -0600 Subject: Re: GUNK At 12:13 PM 20/05/98 -0500, Steve Fullwood, wrote >I know that rovers are supposed to have oil and grease all over. But I was >wondering what the best safe degreasing agent? I also vote for Simple Green. Apart from the fact that it works as advertised, it is also non-toxic, non-mutagenic, and non-carcinogenic. If using full strength, the best technique is to spray the grease laden area with water, then the Simple Green, wait several minutes and scrub around with a brush, rinse off with water and repeat if necessary. Apart from steam cleaning this is the best thing going. Rick Grant 1959, SII "VORIZO" rgrant@cadvision.com www.cadvision.com/rgrant Cobra Media Communications. Calgary, Canada Aboriginal and International Relief Issues ------------------------------[ <- Message 29 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980521 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: SPYDERS <SPYDERS@aol.com> Date: Wed, 20 May 1998 14:37:35 EDT Subject: Re: Simple Green >Apart from steam cleaning this is the best thing going. Except that it is a corrosive substance... There's a soap called Mirachem 750 that I try to get sample bottles of from a local distributor, it is enzyme- based (?) and is one of the few soaps approved by Pratt & Whitney for use in and around their turbines for cleaning purposes, being organic and non- corrosive. I was turned on to it by Mako Marine who use it on their boats post-mold to remove release agents and waxes... if someone really wants to try this, let me know and I'll see what I can do about snagging a bottle or two. (It is only sold in 55gal drums afaik). I also used to use 409, until I found out how corrosive that is when left on bare aluminum... won't even go into Windex... oh well, can't beat good ol' H20 & elbow grease it seems... --pat. ------------------------------[ <- Message 30 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980521 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "\"Mr. Mike\" Passaretti" <passaretti@sol.med.ge.com> Date: Wed, 20 May 1998 13:59:47 -0500 Subject: Door top (and bottom) treatments... OK, so I'm the proud new owner of a '72 Ex-MOD 109" rag-top. I was looking for a hardtop, but this one fell into my lap and it seemed like a good deal. On thing that _is_ wrong with it is that the LH door top is shot. The RH one is OK, but needs some work. Both bottoms show some rust (and a few holes), but nothing majorly structural yet. I have a set of new tops (they came with the vehicle). I've seen some messages fly by about peeling the aluminum off of these and stripping and galvanizing the frames. I've also heard (from the Rovers North catalogue) that Defender door tops fit just fine and are all aluminum. I went by the local LR dealer, and what do you know, they're right. Of course, the cost with glazing, seals, etc. would be >$600 a side, so I'm thinking the originals will do just fine if I treat them right. Is there a particular galvanizing treatment that is the "right" one for this application? The local shop offered several options and is not very Rover aware. -MM ------------------------------[ <- Message 31 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980521 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: SPYDERS <SPYDERS@aol.com> Date: Wed, 20 May 1998 15:01:32 EDT Subject: Defender : Human ratio I was on the Island of Lanai (in Hawaii) and saw 12 Defenders in two days. There's one other defender, but I didn't see it as it was in a closed garage. I also saw 1 109. The defenders I saw ranged from a 110, 94 D90, 95 SWs a bunch of 97 autos, and one Willow Green SW... Now here's the ratio bit: there poulation of Lanai Island is 2,500. divided by the number of rovers I saw, comes to one for every 192 people there... probably not the densest, but given the location, quite a feat. It is kinda bizarre to see that on an islnd where the airport doesn't have an x-ray, there is no traffic light, only about 12 miles of paved road (lots of dirt roads...) and gas costs around $1.90 ish per gallon... one can imagine my surprise at seeing *one* D90, then going down the road a bit and seeing one of the Willow Green ones... --pat. ------------------------------[ <- Message 32 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980521 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Scott Wilson <swilson@scratchstudio.com> Date: Wed, 20 May 1998 15:03:59 -0400 Subject: RE: Simple Green > There's a soap called Mirachem 750 > that I try to get sample bottles of from a local distributor, it is enzyme- > based (?) and is one of the few soaps approved by Pratt & Whitney for use in > and around their turbines for cleaning purposes, being organic and non- > corrosive. I was turned on to it by Mako Marine who use it on their boats > post-mold to remove release agents and waxes... if someone really wants to try > this, let me know and I'll see what I can do about snagging a bottle or two. > (It is only sold in 55gal drums afaik). Except that benzene is also an organic substance, but I can't think of much good that it does for people, so is carbon monoxide, antifreeze, etc... Chances are if it's only available in 55 gallon drums and for use around turbines, then it's not gonna do much for the environment. Sure, that's an overgeneralization, but when it's a choice between tracking down a steam bath or borrowing a sprayer full of some-no-telling-what, then I'd have to go for the steam. I just say this cause I worked for a defense contractor for a while, and the chemicals that the Air Force uses to clean their jets are highly controlled, and most have been outlawed, so they have to regulate the use of what surplus cleaning agents that they have. Of course, I guess if rover-owners were worried about the oil/gas/etc getteing into the environment, then there wouldn't be any rover owners. =:) -Scott (unfortunately, still looking for my first rover.) ------------------------------[ <- Message 33 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980521 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Wayne Haight <whaight@hawaii.edu> Date: Wed, 20 May 1998 06:45:06 -1000 Subject: Re: Defender : Human ratio The reason there are so many Defenders on Lanai is this: there are two expensive hotels (Koele Lodge and Manele Bay Hotel) on Lanai that cater to well heeled guests. Since driving on Lanai is mostly off-road there is now a company who rents Defenders to the well-heeled guests. Thus the Defenders were brought in by the rental company. A friend of mine on Oahu and myself are quietly waiting for them to go out of business, and offer the vehicles for sale, so we can get them for pennies on the dollar (Right, dream on). Just yesterday we were dreaming about buying the company once it files for bankruptcy, shipping the vehicles to Oahu, keeping the best ones for ourselves, and selling the rest. It might happen ( yeah, and monkeys might fly out my butt). SPYDERS wrote: > I was on the Island of Lanai (in Hawaii) and saw 12 Defenders in two > > days. -- Wayne R. Haight Senior Fisheries Research Specialist Joint Institute for Marine and Atmospheric Research 2570 Dole Street Honolulu, Hawaii 96822 ------------------------------[ <- Message 34 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980521 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "William L. Leacock" <wleacock@pipeline.com> Date: Wed, 20 May 1998 16:53:04 -0400 Subject: Chewy bits Lloyd, i would suggest that a good detergent oil would be a safer method of cleaning the internals of your gearbox, they used to make flushing oils, a ten weight, do they still ? Bill Leacock ( Limey in exile ) NY USA. 88 and 109 LR's and 89 RR ------------------------------[ <- Message 35 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980521 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "William L. Leacock" <wleacock@pipeline.com> Date: Wed, 20 May 1998 17:02:28 -0400 Subject: Whining sound Peter, I have had experience of a loud whing from the gearbox after changing a transfer box and also after removing an over drive. The output gear on the rear of the gearbox mainshaft was the culprit in both cases, they are helical gears and should normally run quiet, however there could be some strange wear characteristics at work here. I have found that changing the gear solved the problem. There are of course plenty of other sources, differentials are a prime candidate if the tooth clearance is not adjusted properly, or if the oil level is low, It is also possible that you have a defective bearing. Who rebuilt the transfer box when the new gears were fitted. ? Is the output bearing clearance correct, it is easy to overtightren the taper roller bearing adjustment at the transfer box output Bill Leacock ( Limey in exile ) NY USA. 88 and 109 LR's and 89 RR ------------------------------[ <- Message 36 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980521 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Peter M. Kaskan" <pmk11@cornell.edu> Date: Wed, 20 May 1998 17:04:30 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Removing Al Spot Welds How do I undo the spot welds on my LR bed? ----------------------- Peter M. Kaskan Uris Hall 231 Dept. Of Psychology Cornell University 607-255-3382 pmk11@cornell.edu ----------------------- ------------------------------[ <- Message 37 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980521 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Frankelson <Frankelson@aol.com> Date: Wed, 20 May 1998 17:05:49 EDT Subject: Re: GUNK In a message dated 20/05/98 19:22:30, you write: << I also vote for Simple Green. Apart from the fact that it works as advertised, it is also non-toxic, non-mutagenic, and non-carcinogenic. >> This does sound kinda nice, does anyone know if it, or anything similar, is available in the UK.? I can't get out to look for it myself for a couple of weeks and it would be useful to know what to ask for. TIA best cheers Frank ------------------------------[ <- Message 38 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980521 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Paul Quin <Paul_Quin@pml.com> Date: Wed, 20 May 1998 14:06:04 -0700 Subject: RE: Removing Al Spot Welds With steel, most people just drill them out. Maybe there's a better technique for Aluminium? Anybody? Paul in Victoria. ------------------------------[ <- Message 39 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980521 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: gruno@att.net.hk (Keith Addison) Date: Thu, 21 May 1998 05:24:06 +0800 (HKT) Subject: Re: Rag tops > I have to >>be careful what I say, she's parked just outside the open door 10 ft away >>and might hear, but I know she can't read. >Want to bet? Nigel's Disease has many transmogrifications......... >Mike Rooth Damn, I did have a bit of a sinking feeling when I wrote that. No, I don't want to bet - I've long suspected the beast can read my mind, if not my screen. Mike, I hate to ask, but what is Nigel's Disease? If you think ignorance might be bliss, don't tell me, I'm currently not an entirely happy person, me and the dog just returned from two hours spent ripping bits out of a long-dead 24V lightweight lying in a rice paddy a few miles away and I'm covered in mud, WD40, rust and mosquito repellent (which didn't work), as well as the usual measure of blood, so have mercy! All best Keith Addison Lantau Island Hong Kong 1973 Series III Military Lightweight ------------------------------[ <- Message 40 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980521 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Rick Grant <rgrant@cadvision.com> Date: Wed, 20 May 1998 15:31:58 -0600 Subject: Re: GUNK At 05:05 PM 20/05/98 EDT, Frankelson, wrote >This does sound kinda nice, does anyone know if it, or anything similar, is >available in the UK.? I would think it is. I just had a look on their web page at URL http://www.simplegreen.com/ and a European distributor is listed in their FAQ page. There's quite a bit of information about the stuff on that page but on a quick read through I didn't see anything about aluminum. I haven't noticed any problem with the stuff on aluminum but perhaps I wasn't letting it sit long enough. I'm going to try a longer test on some scrap and see what happens. Rick Grant 1959, SII "VORIZO" rgrant@cadvision.com www.cadvision.com/rgrant Cobra Media Communications. Calgary, Canada Aboriginal and International Relief Issues ------------------------------[ <- Message 41 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980521 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: gruno@att.net.hk (Keith Addison) Date: Thu, 21 May 1998 05:34:41 +0800 (HKT) Subject: Re: GUNK Steve Fullwood wrote: >I know that rovers are supposed to have oil and grease all over. But I was >wondering what the best safe degreasing agent? A marine engineering company recommended Aquabreak PX made by Unitor Chemicals Inc., "the best heavy-duty degreaser we've found". It should be available from US marine supply companies. I haven't tried it, I haven't managed to find any here in Hong Kong yet. I don't know what it's made of or how "safe" it is. All best Keith Addison Lantau Island Hong Kong 1973 Series III Military Lightweight ------------------------------[ <- Message 42 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980521 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Luis Gutierrez" <lgutierr2@hotmail.com> Date: Wed, 20 May 1998 14:45:12 PDT Subject: I prefer LRs to PCs I'm back. When I got to the office on monday I began checking mail and then -zap- the whole thing stopped. The internet server of the office went dead. I have been cut-off from the world for three days. And its not working yet. I had to subscribe via hotmail to keep in touch. Still Nobody knows what is happening with the damn thing. This list-thing is kind of an addiction, and I dont have my LR yet, maybe this weekend. BTW, I saw the other day a truck parked in an old house garage very similar to a SI, but it had a badge that read "AUSTIN" Does anyone know anything about this 4x4s. Do they have any relation to our aluminum friends? ------------------------------[ <- Message 43 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980521 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Frankelson <Frankelson@aol.com> Date: Wed, 20 May 1998 18:04:18 EDT Subject: Re: Defender : Human ratio In a message dated 20/05/98 20:38:16, you write: << (Right, dream on). Just yesterday we were dreaming about buying the company >> All together now, sing: 'You gotta have a dream, if you don't have a dream, how you gonna have a dream come true? Happy talk, keep talking happy talk' that part of the world wasn't it? best cheers Frank ------------------------------[ <- Message 44 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980521 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: SPYDERS <SPYDERS@aol.com> Date: Wed, 20 May 1998 18:17:37 EDT Subject: Not an LR, probably a Gypsy... In a message dated 5/20/98 5:46:54 PM, you wrote: >BTW, I saw the other day a truck parked in an old house garage very >similar to a SI, but it had a badge that read "AUSTIN" >Does anyone know anything about this 4x4s. Do they have any relation to >our aluminum friends? It probably is a Gypsy. My dad speaks highly of them, but he owns a LR, go figure. --pat (whose dad rode up scottish mountains on exeat in them) parsons ------------------------------[ <- Message 45 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980521 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Frankelson <Frankelson@aol.com> Date: Wed, 20 May 1998 18:18:43 EDT Subject: Re: GUNK In a message dated 20/05/98 22:34:05, you write: << and a European distributor is listed in their FAQ page. >> Rick Thank U I'll have a look for myself best cheers Frank ------------------------------[ <- Message 46 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980521 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Frankelson <Frankelson@aol.com> Date: Wed, 20 May 1998 18:18:45 EDT Subject: Re: I prefer LRs to PCs In a message dated 20/05/98 22:46:54, you write: << similar to a SI, but it had a badge that read "AUSTIN" >> should be an Austin Gypsy, Austin's attempt at the Land Rover market many moons ago. There's a flourishing club in the UK but they never really sold many. You know about the Austin Champ another 4by which had a Rolls Royce engine do you? best cheers Frank ------------------------------[ <- Message 47 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980521 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Cameron Sear <cameron.sear@bne.com.au> Date: Thu, 21 May 1998 08:28:03 +1000 Subject: High Strung... I've seen a few rovers with tightly strung wire between the corner of their bullbars and roofrack. What is the purose of this? Confused... Cameron Sear 67 LWB http://members.tripod.com/~csear ------------------------------[ <- Message 48 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980521 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Frankelson <Frankelson@aol.com> Date: Wed, 20 May 1998 18:32:04 EDT Subject: Re: High Strung... In a message dated 20/05/98 23:26:44, you write: << I've seen a few rovers with tightly strung wire between the corner of their bullbars and roofrack. What is the purose of this? >> overhanging branches off trees slide up the wires and over the roof instead of taking out a windscreen. best cheers Frank ------------------------------[ <- Message 49 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980521 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Luis Gutierrez" <lgutierr2@hotmail.com> Date: Wed, 20 May 1998 15:33:37 PDT Subject: Re: I prefer LRs to PCs Never heard of any "Austin Champ". Could that be one? >From owner-lro@playground.sun.com Wed May 20 15:20:44 1998 >Received: from localhost (daemon@localhost) > by playground.sun.com (8.9.0+Sun/8.9.0) with SMTP id PAA01576; > Wed, 20 May 1998 15:19:16 -0700 (PDT) >Received: by Land-Rover.Team.Net (bulk_mailer v1.3); Wed, 20 May 1998 15:19:10 -0700 >From: Frankelson <Frankelson@aol.com> >Date: Wed, 20 May 1998 18:18:45 EDT >Reply-To: lro@playground.sun.com >To: lro@playground.sun.com >X-To: lro@playground.sun.com >Subject: Re: I prefer LRs to PCs >Message-ID: <bulk.1554.19980520151910@Land-Rover.Team.Net> [ truncated by list-digester (was 13 lines)] ><< similar to a SI, but it had a badge that read "AUSTIN" >> >should be an Austin Gypsy, Austin's attempt at the Land Rover market many >moons ago. >There's a flourishing club in the UK but they never really sold many. >You know about the Austin Champ another 4by which had a Rolls Royce engine do >you? >best cheers >Frank > ** 'lro' mailing list information from >X-To: lro@playground.sun.com >Subject: Re: I prefer LRs to PCs 'majordomo@Land-Rover.Team.Net' >you? ------------------------------[ <- Message 50 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980521 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "John C. Hinkle" <defender110@email.msn.com> Date: Wed, 20 May 1998 17:47:02 -0500 Subject: Re: High Strung... Deflects tree limbs so they won't hit the windshield. Chris Hinkle ------------------------------[ <- Message 51 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980521 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Ben Brand" <ben_brand@hotmail.com> Date: Wed, 20 May 1998 15:44:34 PDT Subject: unsubscribe ------------------------------[ <- Message 52 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980521 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: SPYDERS <SPYDERS@aol.com> Date: Wed, 20 May 1998 18:45:39 EDT Subject: Re: High Strung... In a message dated 5/20/98 6:26:44 PM, you wrote: >I've seen a few rovers with tightly strung wire between the corner of their >bullbars and roofrack. >What is the purose of this? >Confused... These were developed by SafariGuide, a company that made stick deflectors and stuff. As mentioned they deflect twigs and stuff away from the windscreen, but they can also be used to call game. Tighten one tighter than the other, then pluck with both hands; the resonance of LWB land rovers has been known to attract bull elephants, hence their popularity with people going on safari. Elephant populations have dropped dramatically since LR left the african market... ;-) Twang away... --pat. ------------------------------[ <- Message 53 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980521 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Huw Jones <desrads@btinternet.com> Date: Mon, 27 Aug 1956 22:55:05 +0000 Subject: s3 brake woes Terje, I had a similar problem with my IIa, caused by the brake shoes being maladjusted so that they were 'leaning over' and wearing the drums more on the outside. Total cure with skimmed drums & oversize linings with correct adjustment of the supporting strut in the middle of the shoes- after endless frustration. All spoiled by an oil leak almost immediately! Good Luck Huw Jones ------------------------------[ <- Message 54 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980521 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Mark Talbot" <rangerover@top.monad.net> Date: Wed, 20 May 1998 19:44:50 -0400 Subject: Weekend off-road in NH and VT I'm have been asked by a few people to arrange a weekend off-road trip covering trails in NH and VT. I certainly know of enough trails in NH but will need help in VT. The idea was put to me that we have a weekend event. Start on Friday Evening with a night drive over easy green lanes. Camp Friday evening. Off-road all day Saturday and head to VT. Bar-B-Q Saturday evening. Sunday off-road in VT. Vehicles limited to 10. Is thought mid to late August well after the 50th in Cortland. Anyone interested ?? e-mail me back ------------------------------[ <- Message 55 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980521 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
[digester: Removing section of: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; ] From: "Art Bitterman" <artbitt@rmi.net> Date: Wed, 20 May 1998 18:00:27 -0600 Subject: update on paint job charset="iso-8859-1" Hi all! I posted a message asking for help on the brush/roller paint job on = "The Beast" about a week ago-thought I'd give you all an update. I'm taking the guys from the FT Pitt groups advice (Sorry can't find = your name right now!!!) and leaving well enough alone-I'll soon have a = coat of mud on it anyway!!! Whilst I had it down for painting, I also stripped out the cab and = repainted it also. Rewired the dash/instrument panel (the PO and ok,I'll = admit it,me, had made a bodge of the wiring!!) Put a layer of = soundproofing/thermal insulation down and covered it with carpet. I can = actually hear the radio now at speed (odd term for a Series!!!) on the = interstate!!! Sprayed the floor in cargo area with pickup bed liner material-this = ought to stop the "stuff" in the back from sliding around. Painted = bonnet and tops of wings flat black to stop the sun's glare. All in all I'm happy I quess! My neighbors like it-it's just that I know = where the mistakes are and they jump out to me.From 10 feet away you = can't see the brush marks--quess I'll just take off my bifocals when = approaching it and put 'em back on when ready to drive away!!! Thanks for all your advice!!! Art Bitterman Gunsmith !960 SII 88" (rhd) "The Beast" Trinidad,Colorado "Jack of all Trades,Master of Some!" ------=_NextPart_000_0009_01BD8419.2BFD20A0 [ Original post was HTML ] [digester: Removing section of: Content-Type: text/html; ] ------------------------------[ <- Message 56 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980521 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "K. John Wood" <jwrover@colo-net.com> Date: Thu, 21 May 1998 06:25:58 -0600 Subject: Re: Impending journey Hey!!! Come to the Solihull Society National Rally... June 25 -28 1998 Steamboat Springs, CO About 2.5 Hours ...make that 3.5 in a 109..Believe me I know!! >From Evergreen...in a NW direction... It would be great to have you...PS all the sreies vehicles from Evergreen will be there! Your's John Wood www.solihullsociety.org ------------------------------[ <- Message 57 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980521 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "MARY THOMSON" <denthomson@sprint.ca> Date: Wed, 20 May 1998 21:55:57 -0400 Subject: Re: the saga continues Now / Now - I am very (Quote). disappointed. There was no mention of the proud owners of these fine works of art. Not only that there was no description of the of the fine works of art these proud owners own. So I don't think it was very nice of Michael to come back and put a name of the proud owner of a very big dog to my story. There is nothing left to say. I am lost for words. (ROO) ---------- > From: d.h.lowe <dhlowe@idirect.com> > To: lro@playground.sun.com > Subject: Re: the saga continues > Date: Tuesday, May 19, 1998 9:41 AM > I know, I know but what can you do.Wait until Ottawa I will use him for > wheel grip. In the meantime I am training my little puppy to cock his leg on > his wheels. Talk about galvanic corrosion..Larry phoned ,he is moving north > east from San Diego after spending a few days in the Baha .He spoke to Brett > and told him about losing oil from his front swivel housing..........seems > he had lost a bolt from the bottom bearing pin !!!!!! the other three were > also loose..... no lock tabs I guess. Last week he had to remove his rear > diff to tighten the ring gear bolts. BUT he came out with the classic > comment that he is having a good time ....."but I am disappointed in the > truck"........Its never the owner, always the vehicle........Boy oh boy is > he in for a royal slagging when he gets back. > Michael Fredette wrote: > > Dave Lowe, > > Looks like "Mary" is at it again, more veiled insults. Dirty > [ truncated by lro-lite (was 10 lines)] > wheel grip. In the meantime I am training my little puppy to cock his leg ------------------------------[ <- Message 58 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980521 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "MARY THOMSON" <denthomson@sprint.ca> Date: Wed, 20 May 1998 21:58:07 -0400 Subject: Re: I prefer LRs to PCs Austin Champ ---------- > From: Luis Gutierrez <lgutierr2@hotmail.com> > To: lro@playground.sun.com > Subject: I prefer LRs to PCs > Date: Wednesday, May 20, 1998 5:45 PM > I'm back. > When I got to the office on monday I began checking mail and then -zap- > the whole thing stopped. The internet server of the office went dead. I [ truncated by list-digester (was 20 lines)] > Does anyone know anything about this 4x4s. Do they have any relation to > our aluminum friends? ------------------------------[ <- Message 59 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980521 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Russ Wilson <rwilson@usaor.net> Date: Wed, 20 May 1998 22:01:24 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: update on paint job >I'm taking the guys from the FT Pitt groups advice (Sorry can't find = >your name right now!!!) and leaving well enough alone-I'll soon have a = >coat of mud on it anyway!!! Glad to hear it!!! I'll soon be in your area?? I'm moving to Evergreen in 3 weeks. See you at a Solihull Society meeting sometime soon.. Russ Wilson Leslie Bittner Fort Pitt Land Rover Group Pittsburgh, Pa. ------------------------------[ <- Message 60 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980521 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Jarvis 64 <Jarvis64@aol.com> Date: Wed, 20 May 1998 22:45:46 EDT Subject: Re: Simple Green Try using Marine Clean, made by the POR 15 folks. It's about $15 for a gallon. I just used it to clean my Salisbury axle prior to installation and it does an amazing job, is organic (I believe--haven't gotten the bottle out of my friend's garage yet so can't check it), and leaves NO residue once you rinse it off. Bill Rice 64 109 SW PS--thanks for all the invites for my trip--anyone want to do a leg w/ me? ------------------------------[ <- Message 61 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980521 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Jarvis 64 <Jarvis64@aol.com> Date: Wed, 20 May 1998 22:46:29 EDT Subject: squeaky brakes Hi everybody, Just put new front brake drums on and apparently I failed to get out all that sticky anti-rust stuff prior to installation. Soon had high-volume screech that embarassed me at large intersections. Took drums off last night, sanded (very fine grit) inside of drums gently, scuffed brake shoes up, cleaned everything off w/ brake cleaner. Didn't work for long, although right away it seemed to have been a success, but now they're still squealing. Has that stuff contaminated my shoes permanently? Are new shoes the only answer? Thanks for any sage advice. Bill ------------------------------[ <- Message 62 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980521 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: David Cockey <dcockey@tir.com> Date: Wed, 20 May 1998 22:51:07 -0400 Subject: Re: Removing Al Spot Welds Spot welds can be drilled out with a twist drill, but if you want to minimize damage to the second layer use a "spot weld bit" which Eastwoods among others sell. It allows the pieces to be plug welded back together if desired. Regards, David Cockey Peter M. Kaskan wrote: > How do I undo the spot welds on my LR bed? ------------------------------[ <- Message 63 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980521 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: David Cockey <dcockey@tir.com> Date: Wed, 20 May 1998 22:55:42 -0400 Subject: Re: High Strung... And slice flesh off bones if a pedestrian or cyclist hits them. Years ago I slide into the forestay of a sailboat when it ran aground, and the stay neatly sliced 3" gash in my knee. I hate to think what could happen if someone running wires had a collision (even low speed) with a cyclist or pedestrian. Take them off when operating on the public road. There aren't any tree limbs to protect against there. Regards, David Cockey > << I've seen a few rovers with tightly strung wire between the corner > of their > bullbars and roofrack. > What is the purose of this? > overhanging branches off trees slide up the wires and over the roof > instead > of taking out a windscreen. ------------------------------[ <- Message 64 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980521 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Rick Grant <rgrant@cadvision.com> Date: Wed, 20 May 1998 21:47:44 -0600 Subject: Re: squeaky brakes At 10:46 PM 20/05/98 EDT, Jarvis 64, wrote >sticky anti-rust stuff prior to installation. Soon had high-volume screech >that embarassed me at large intersections. I hate to sound like I work for the company, which I do not, but Simple Green is terrific for cleaning that anti-rust stuff off. (I also rave about WD40) Rick Grant 1959, SII "VORIZO" rgrant@cadvision.com www.cadvision.com/rgrant Cobra Media Communications. Calgary, Canada Aboriginal and International Relief Issues ------------------------------[ <- Message 65 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980521 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "d.h.lowe" <dhlowe@idirect.com> Date: Wed, 20 May 1998 12:04:20 -0400 Subject: Re: Stage One V8 Exhaust Manifold Have to disagree. I have just been through my microfiche and find the following..............Vehicles built to ECE 15.03 standard....Left hand drive ONLY. use part no.7176 for the right hand manifold and 7174 for the left hand manifold. Detoxed engines up to engine no. 11G00855 use part no.ERC4720 for the right hand manifold and ERC3101 for the non detoxed right hand manifold. The left hand manifold is ERC3482 These are all 109 V8 numbers. The Range Rover manifolds up to Oct 1985 are ERC5925 right hand and ERC5069 left hand for engines 11D. 15D. 16D. 17D. 19D. 20D. 21D.................Detoxed engines 355,359 suffix A,B use 611520 r.h. and also ERC3101 r.h the left hand is ERC5069 .........Australia vehicles ,engines 398 suffix F. use ERC2994 r.h. and ERC2992 l.h. .........I have been through later R.R, 110, and 90 ( which have another large list of manifolds) and cannot find a 2995 If your manifold is the plain rounded type with a centre outlet pointing straight down and no heater box you might try a SDI car manifold. > << 'm in need of a new (Right Hand) Exhaust manifold for my Stage One V8 109. > Mine's cracked and the Rover# is ERC2995. The problem is that nobody has any > record of that number existing. >> > Ted, > I've got part no ERC 7174 for left hand drive (ERC 7176 right hand drive) in > my parts book. Try your dealer on that. [ truncated by list-digester (was 12 lines)] > best cheers > Frank ------------------------------[ <- Message 66 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980521 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "=?iso-8859-1?Q?Bj=F8rnung_Jensen?=" <bjjen13b@online.no> Date: Thu, 21 May 1998 07:27:51 +0200 Subject: Re: High Strung... They are also a potential lethal in even minor impacts with pedestrians. I would suggest taking them off when back on public roads. Bjørnung Jensen Norway << I've seen a few rovers with tightly strung wire between the corner of their bullbars and roofrack. What is the purose of this? >> overhanging branches off trees slide up the wires and over the roof instead of taking out a windscreen. ------------------------------[ <- Message 67 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980521 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: gruno@att.net.hk (Keith Addison) Date: Thu, 21 May 1998 14:43:09 +0800 (HKT) Subject: Re: update on paint job Hi Art Radio? Gosh - and you can hear it? >Put a layer of = >soundproofing/thermal insulation down and covered it with carpet. What sort of soundproofing/thermal insulation did you use? I can take the din, but my beast gets damn hot down there on the floor round the gearbox housing (is that a standard ailment??) and it's going to be downright unpleasant come midsummer. All best Keith Addison Lantau Island Hong Kong 1973 Series III Military Lightweight ------------------------------[ <- Message 68 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980521 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Frankelson <Frankelson@aol.com> Date: Thu, 21 May 1998 03:07:15 EDT Subject: Re: I prefer LRs to PCs In a message dated 20/05/98 23:35:32, you write: << Never heard of any "Austin Champ". Could that be one? >> Yr first mailing said it looked like a Ser 1, that's the Austin Gypsy. The Champ looked more Jeep-like. best cheers Frank ------------------------------[ <- Message 69 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980521 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Frankelson <Frankelson@aol.com> Date: Thu, 21 May 1998 03:07:25 EDT Subject: Re: update on paint job In a message dated 21/05/98 01:08:17, you write: << All in all I'm happy I quess! My neighbors like it-it's just that I know = where the mistakes are and they jump out to me.From 10 feet away you = can't see the brush marks >> You got better eyesight than me. Takes me and a friend two and a half hours to paint my 110 and you can't see the brush marks from six feet away. Or are we just more skillful and artistic :-)> best cheers Frank PS did my trailler the other week, 27 minutes from picking the brush up (6ft x 4ft all metal) ------------------------------[ <- Message 70 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980521 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: M.J.Rooth@lboro.ac.uk (Mike Rooth) Date: Thu, 21 May 1998 10:44:45 +0000 Subject: Re: 88" and sideshafts after 1980 the story I was told was that they only changed the number of splines on >the outside - which is easy to handle: just put new flanges on. Would that it were that simple.But I'm deeply suspicious that its not. These things never are.Anyone with a late S111 who's had the halfshafts out? Mike Rooth ------------------------------[ <- Message 71 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980521 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
END OF * LIST DIGEST Input: messages 70 lines 3048 [forwarded 323 whitespace 0] Output: lines 1963 [content 1649 forwarded 215 (cut 108) whitespace 0][ First Message | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980521 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Digest Messages Copyright 1990-1999 by the original poster or/and Empire Rover Owners Society, All rights reserved. Photos & text Copyright 1990-1999 Bill Caloccia, All rights reserved. Empire/LRO List of charges for Empire/LRO Policies
against the distribution of unsolicited commercial e-mail (aka SPAM).
|
![]() |
|||
<--Back |
HOME |
TOP |
Forward --> |
|