[ First Message Last | Table of Contents | <- Digest -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
msg | Sender | lines | Subject |
1 | Jarvis 64 [Jarvis64@aol. | 17 | CBs |
2 | eheite@dmv.com (Ned Heit | 24 | winch danger |
3 | Alan_Richer@motorcity2.l | 28 | Re: CBs |
4 | Peter Goundry [peterg@ai | 13 | $30k for a 101!! Wow, |
5 | "Ron Beckett" [hillman@b | 13 | 530 Landies at Cooma |
6 | David Scheidt [david@inf | 15 | Re: CBs |
7 | Dave Haynes [David.Hayne | 47 | Recovery Points |
8 | mark.luker@virgin.net (m | 13 | Information For UK Listers. |
9 | "Hubert J. Greenbaum" [h | 46 | AKA: guru@manhole..... I'm back!! |
10 | Solihull [Solihull@aol.c | 23 | Re: Removing tranny from engine |
11 | Solihull [Solihull@aol.c | 21 | Re: 2.5 into 2/3 will go |
12 | Adrian Redmond [channel6 | 42 | Painting SIII engine block |
13 | NADdMD [NADdMD@aol.com> | 25 | Re: Painting SIII engine block |
14 | jimfoo@uswest.net | 12 | 2.25 Petrol Woes :-( |
15 | Craig Morgan [C.Morgan@s | 80 | Re: Recovery Points |
16 | M.J.Rooth@lboro.ac.uk (M | 16 | Re: Painting SIII engine block |
17 | AKBLACKLEY [AKBLACKLEY@a | 11 | Petrol Woes (wont run) |
18 | TeriAnn Wakeman [twakema | 134 | Re: 2.25 Petrol Woes :-( |
19 | TeriAnn Wakeman [twakema | 84 | Re: CBs |
20 | "Peter M. Kaskan" [pmk11 | 46 | Any trouble with UK parts distributors? |
21 | NADdMD [NADdMD@aol.com> | 18 | Re: 2.25 Petrol Woes :-( |
22 | "Dr R.D.Thomson" [rthoms | 11 | parts suppliers in UK |
23 | Jeremy Bartlett [bartlet | 53 | Re: Any trouble with UK parts distributors? |
24 | Paul Quin [Paul_Quin@pml | 13 | Rolls Royce again? (No LR) |
25 | "Chris Dillard"[cdillard | 16 | Re: Rolls Royce again? (No LR) |
26 | =?us-ascii?Q?Douglas_Boh | 11 | RE: Rolls Royce again? (No LR) |
27 | Adrian Redmond [channel6 | 21 | Re: Painting SIII engine block |
28 | "Clark, Patrick D." [Cla | 7 | RE: Rolls Royce again? (No LR) |
29 | "Clark, Patrick D." [Cla | 7 | RE: Rolls Royce again? (No LR) |
30 | Jarvis 64 [Jarvis64@aol. | 17 | Re: Re: Any trouble with UK parts distributors? |
31 | NADdMD [NADdMD@aol.com> | 31 | Transferbox low gear question |
32 | "Con P. Seitl" [seitl@ns | 83 | Petrol Woes, cont...... |
33 | "John C. Hinkle" [defend | 10 | Re: Transferbox low gear question |
34 | "MARY THOMSON" [denthoms | 27 | Re: 101' prices |
35 | David Cockey [dcockey@ti | 29 | Re: Any trouble with UK parts distributors? |
36 | David Cockey [dcockey@ti | 19 | Re: Rolls Royce again? (LR content) |
37 | "d.h.lowe" [dhlowe@idire | 23 | Re: 101' prices |
38 | eheite@dmv.com (Ned Heit | 23 | acquisitions |
39 | "d.h.lowe" [dhlowe@idire | 20 | Re: Painting SIII engine block |
40 | CIrvin1258 [CIrvin1258@a | 30 | Re: Any trouble with UK parts distributors? |
41 | "Said Geoffrey at MITTS" | 23 | RE:Re: 2.25 to 2.5 or 2.6L Diesel |
42 | Rovergo [Rovergo@aol.com | 12 | 2 dead holes |
43 | "Richard Marsden"[rmarsd | 27 | Re: Rolls Royce again? (No LR) |
44 | "Con P. Seitl" [seitl@ns | 19 | Re: 2 dead holes |
45 | Alan_Richer@motorcity2.l | 14 | Re: Transferbox low gear question |
From: Jarvis 64 <Jarvis64@aol.com> Date: Thu, 7 May 1998 07:27:02 EDT Subject: CBs Hi everyone, I reckon I ought to buy a CB before my journeys/rallys this summer. Anyone have any strong opinions on brands to look for/avoid? Should I just buy a cheapie @ WalMart? Thanks for any input. Bill Rice Watertown (5 weeks here left) NY 64 109 SW ------------------------------[ <- Message 2 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980508 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: eheite@dmv.com (Ned Heite) Date: Thu, 7 May 1998 07:31:01 -0500 Subject: winch danger Cut-off switches are a good idea for any working vehicle whenever the power must be left on while people are not in the car. When I rewired Baby this winter, the winch controller was moved to the dashbord (cheap kit from Superwinch) and a cut-off switch was installed on the breakfast. The cut-off switch is a standard part from the auto supply, but SWMBO has a sign shop, so she made Baby a red plate labelled "Kill Switch" so that it can be found in emergencies when I may not be able to help. The switch mounts next to the battery, so minimum rearrangement of the wiring was necessary. _____ ___(_____) |Baby the\ Most problems in life have a single right |1969 Land\_===__ solution and a single wrong solution, only | ___Rover ___|o one of which may involve duct tape. |_/ . \______/ . || ___\_/________\_/________________________________________________ Ned Heite, Camden, DE http://home.dmv.com/~eheite/index.html ------------------------------[ <- Message 3 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980508 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Alan_Richer@motorcity2.lotus.com Date: Thu, 7 May 1998 07:31:40 -0400 Subject: Re: CBs Where to buy? Personal opinion, the nearest flea market/pawnshop. I've never bought a new one of these, but I usually do insist on an on-air test. The one Mr. Churchill presently sports was made in the late 1970s, and gets used because it fits the connectors and mount of my 2-meter transciever perfectly. This way, I can swap antenna masts and rigs for whatever I want to be doing with little effort. I've also never paid more than $10 for one. Cheap, me? Damn straight. 8*) I have a personal taste for older units - in comparison with the new el-cheapos, the noise rejection and receiver sensitivity seems better. This isn't measured, of course, but more Mk. 3 hairy eyeball opinion from listening to too many receivers for too many years. Pity you're not closer - I probably have 2 or 3 units lurking around my garage.... Alan R. ------------------------------[ <- Message 4 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980508 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Peter Goundry <peterg@aircast.com> Date: Thu, 7 May 1998 08:03:06 -0400 Subject: $30k for a 101!! Wow, To true Bill, dropped by Blanchards in March and they had a beautiful 101 EFR for sale for 3000 pounds. Only the year was wrong, to young! If anybody has $30,000 to spare for a 101, I will go to England to get one for them (and one for myself gratis) Peter Goundry 67 GS109" IIA, 73 Lightweight, 97 D90 #127 ------------------------------[ <- Message 5 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980508 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Ron Beckett" <hillman@bigpond.com> Date: Thu, 7 May 1998 22:35:54 +1000 Subject: 530 Landies at Cooma Check the photo at http://4wd.sofcom.com/News/1998/980410.Cooma1.html for the image of all those Landies. Ron ------------------------------[ <- Message 6 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980508 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: David Scheidt <david@infocom.com> Date: Thu, 7 May 1998 07:52:38 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: CBs On Thu, 7 May 1998 Alan_Richer@motorcity2.lotus.com wrote: > Personal opinion, the nearest flea market/pawnshop. I've never bought a new This is probably the way to go. However, if it is important to you, Uniden still makes some CBs that can be used with positive earth systems. I have a 510 -I think- which can do that. David ------------------------------[ <- Message 7 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980508 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Dave Haynes <David.Haynes@roke.co.uk> Date: Thu, 07 May 1998 13:52:02 +0100 Subject: Recovery Points Craig Morgan asked about recovery points and rear towing gear. I've got David Bowyers front hi-lift adapters fitted and I'm very happy with them. I've had my rangie pulled out of some very sticky clay mud on Salisbury Plain this weekend with no problems or signs of strain. They also work very well with the hi-lift and 90/110 nose adapter. The only problem I had with fitting was finding a bolt to pick up the panhard rod carrier on the nearside. The adapter fits each side with three holes - the 2 bumper mounts and the panhard rod mounting (which is of course only fitted on one side). I used M10 x 120mm 8.8 High Tensile. I intend to replace the bumper bolts with HT bolts as well when time permits. The holes in the adapters for the bumper bolts seemed too large to me, but it hasn't moved under jacking so I guess its OK. I also have the DB rear hi-lift adapter plate, which bolts under the tow-ball. I've not used it in anger but it looks strong enough to me to take some serious abuse. My Rangie had the 4 position towbar fitted when I bought it, two bolt through the chassis and two stays forward to the chassis pick up points. I removed the whole lot, cut the drop plate in half and re-fitted it using new bolts. The stays have the same M10 at the front (cos I bought a box and they are the right size) but I've only used M8 where the stays meet the drop plate (also cos thats what fitted). I recovered a hybrid up a steep incline (and also pulled it back onto its wheels at one stage) last weekend and the bar shows no sign of strain. Since the bottom of the drop plate is now raised by 3 inches or thereabouts, its a lot less inclide to bang on the deck or do plough impressions now. The lack of bracing at the bottom of the plate doesnt seem to cause a problem, though I couldn't claim to have tested the front or the back to the limits. The chassis pick up points at the back are substantial, so you might also consider making up something similar to the DB front units. That would allow you to have a better angle than even my shortened towbar allows. THINKS - 'Hmm, a bobtail would be even better. I wonder if...........' Cheers Dave ------------------------------[ <- Message 8 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980508 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: mark.luker@virgin.net (mark.luker@virgin.net) Date: Thu, 7 May 1998 13:59:20 +0100 Subject: Information For UK Listers. For any listers in the UK, who arn't already aware. On BBC2's TOP GEAR this evening @ 8:30, there is a bit on Landrover's 50th. Just so you don't miss it. Mark. ------------------------------[ <- Message 9 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980508 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Hubert J. Greenbaum" <hubie@neo.lrun.com> Date: Thu, 7 May 1998 09:18:32 -0400 Subject: AKA: guru@manhole..... I'm back!! Greetings all, Well after a LONG 10 months, Ive finally got my life and e-mail sorted out enough to re-subscribe to the list ;-))). Greetings and salutations to any "old-timers" who may remember me and "Baldrick" (SIII FFR 109). Just a quick testament to the strength of the old LR's, I managed to drive Baldrick from Baltimore to NE Ohio on two cylinders (I knew something would go wrong as I was too well prepaired ;-) ). I picked him up from the dock in baltimore, checked the lights and everything worked so far, pushed in the hazard switch and it stuck on (shorted switch). Bad omen of the things to come ;-). So disconnected the swich and also lost the turn signals in the process ;-). Drove out of the parking lot and the engine started missing a cylinder, cue instant panic ;-). Stop and check some things but no appearant indication of whats wrong. So off we go, more than a little nervous about the 400 mile drive ahead. All's well till the Penn. mountains, start going up and about the time I get to the top I loose another cylinder. Start going down and picking up speed (going up was a 25-35 MPH affair) and the third cyl. came back online long enough to get me started back up the next hill where the process of loosing the 2'nd cyl would begin again ;-(. About 50 miles from the Ohio border I lost the 2'nd cyl for good ;-( To make a long story short, fearing two burnt valves, I pulled the spark plug from #4 only to have the "innards" of the plug fall into my hand, talk about instant relief. Seems what was happening was that with #4 dead, the unburned mixture from there would foul #3 out when I put a load on the engine and it would clear when I went downhill. Anyway, true to form, He got me home!!! As an aside, if Richard Marsden(?) is still on the list, did you ever get your SIII up and running? Also does anybody know if BRLRC has any "doins" during the week? I had these visions of becoming involved with the club untill I got a job where I only work on the weekend ;-(((. Anyway sorry for the rambling and if anybody here sees an OD green 109 tooling down the road in the vicinity of Akron Oh, gimme a wave ;-)) Cheers, Todd ------------------------------[ <- Message 10 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980508 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Solihull <Solihull@aol.com> Date: Thu, 7 May 1998 10:32:17 EDT Subject: Re: Removing tranny from engine If rust has caused the input shaft to seize on the clutch disc, you would have this problem. Remove the shifter and undo the clutch pressure plate bolts so it's loose too. Problem is, if the disc is seized to the flywheel or presplate, too, that'll still be a bear. Hang in there! See you this summer in GA! Cheers!! John Dillingham near Canton, GA KF4NAS LROA #1095 73 s3 swb 25902676b DD "Pansy" 72 s3 swb 25900502a rusted, in suspended animation Looking for a P5 project, well, OK, or a P6 or another SD1 Vintage Rover Service, since 1994, where we say: Land Rovers for Agriculture! Land Rovers for Industry! Land Rovers for Recreation! Land Rovers forever!! D.V. ------------------------------[ <- Message 11 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980508 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Solihull <Solihull@aol.com> Date: Thu, 7 May 1998 10:35:03 EDT Subject: Re: 2.5 into 2/3 will go I put a 2.5 gas in a IIa a few months ago. Only had to ever-so-lightly ream the holes out for the slightly beefier bellhousing studs. It was to a s3 bellhousing, tho. Cheers!! John Dillingham near Canton, GA KF4NAS LROA #1095 73 s3 swb 25902676b DD "Pansy" 72 s3 swb 25900502a rusted, in suspended animation Looking for a P5 project, well, OK, or a P6 or another SD1 Vintage Rover Service, since 1994, where we say: Land Rovers for Agriculture! Land Rovers for Industry! Land Rovers for Recreation! Land Rovers forever!! D.V. ------------------------------[ <- Message 12 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980508 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Adrian Redmond <channel6@post2.tele.dk> Date: Thu, 07 May 1998 16:31:34 +0200 Subject: Painting SIII engine block What does the book of experience say about painting engine blocks? I have a completly naked frame and motor at the moment, so the paint job will be easy, before the new firewall is fitted. My engine is originally a yukky pastel green (which i am sure has an official name). I am not worried about originality, I just want a clean, light glossy cover, which can withstand the heat and make it easy to clean and find oil leaks. What type of paint is recommended? Names and part numbers are not a lot of use, as (besides Hammerite) there are few foreign paints on the market here in Denmark - so i am looking for advice about paint types - does it need to be high temperature paint, or will "ordinary" mechanics enamel gloss do the job? Has anyone tried using hammerite for the engine block - my local farm implement workshop has a nice shade of green on stock - will Hammerite be OK? Words of wisdom from the University of Life warmly welcomed... Adrian Redmond CHANNEL 6 TELEVISION DENMARK (Adrian Redmond) Foerlevvej 6 Mesing DK-8660 Skanderborg Denmark telephone (office) +45 86 57 22 66 telephone (home) +45 86 57 22 64 telefacsimile / data +45 86 57 24 46 mobile GSM (EFP unit) +45 40 74 75 64 mobile GSM (admin) +45 40 54 22 66 mobile NMT +45 30 86 75 66 e-mail channel6@post2.tele.dk Visit our homepages! www.channel6.dk ------------------------------[ <- Message 13 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980508 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: NADdMD <NADdMD@aol.com> Date: Thu, 7 May 1998 11:11:11 EDT Subject: Re: Painting SIII engine block In a message dated 5/7/98 11:05:15 AM Eastern Daylight Time, channel6@post2.tele.dk writes: << What type of paint is recommended? Names and part numbers are not a lot of use, as (besides Hammerite) there are few foreign paints on the market here in Denmark - so i am looking for advice about paint types - does it need to be high temperature paint, or will "ordinary" mechanics enamel gloss do the job? >> Here in rural US of A, most auto parts stores carry various colors of engine paint, which is a high temperature paint that also tends to resist oil, petrol, vibration and expansion of surfaces. I have actually used it on a stove which I wanted to repaint as well. (white gloss) Before painting, mask off the mating surfaces and orifices. BTW, my new engine is Buick green (kinda bluish-green) Nate ------------------------------[ <- Message 14 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980508 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: jimfoo@uswest.net Date: Thu, 07 May 1998 09:37:51 -0700 Subject: 2.25 Petrol Woes :-( Have you checked or replaced your plug wires lately? Are the valves adjusted properly? I've had problems because of both of these, although they weren't on my rover. Good luck. Jim Hall jimfoo@uswest.net '66 88 pickup, now wearing it's soft top ------------------------------[ <- Message 15 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980508 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Craig Morgan <C.Morgan@soc.staffs.ac.uk> Date: Thu, 07 May 1998 16:38:46 +0100 Subject: Re: Recovery Points At 13:52 07/05/98 +0100, you wrote: >Craig Morgan asked about recovery points and rear towing gear. >I've got David Bowyers front hi-lift adapters fitted and I'm very happy >with them. I've had my rangie pulled out of some very sticky clay mud on >Salisbury Plain this weekend with no problems or signs of strain. They >also work very well with the hi-lift and 90/110 nose adapter. Sounds good ... looks like two of these just got added to the proverbial upgrade list ... I've got the nose adapter on order any way. >The only problem I had with fitting was finding a bolt to pick up the >panhard rod carrier on the nearside. The adapter fits each side with >three holes - the 2 bumper mounts and the panhard rod mounting (which >is of course only fitted on one side). I used M10 x 120mm 8.8 High >Tensile. I intend to replace the bumper bolts with HT bolts as well when >time permits. The holes in the adapters for the bumper bolts seemed too >large to me, but it hasn't moved under jacking so I guess its OK. So what did you do on the near side then ... only two bolts (!) or have you drilled out a mount on the chassis? >I also have the DB rear hi-lift adapter plate, which bolts under the >tow-ball. I've not used it in anger but it looks strong enough to me >to take some serious abuse. My Rangie had the 4 position towbar fitted >when I bought it, two bolt through the chassis and two stays forward to >the chassis pick up points. I removed the whole lot, cut the drop plate >in half and re-fitted it using new bolts. The stays have the same M10 at >the front (cos I bought a box and they are the right size) but I've only [ truncated by list-digester (was 15 lines)] >doesnt seem to cause a problem, though I couldn't claim to have tested >the front or the back to the limits. Mines the four bolt setup as well, I've considered shortening the drop plate, which has the advantage of the increased clearance with some remaining protection for the tail - but I can't help feeling that dropping it off might not be a better proposition. Last Sunday, I spent two hours recovering a RR pick-up up a long, very steep incline, burning out rubber on the rear tyres and warming up the rear axle nicely ... not a sign of stress on the current hitch, which is bl**dy amazingly strong! >The chassis pick up points at the back are substantial, so you might >also consider making up something similar to the DB front units. That >would allow you to have a better angle than even my shortened towbar >allows. I was thinking more along these lines to be honest, I took a look at the rear hitch adapter and was'nt sure that I really wanted to be lifting (but more importantly - casting the vehicle) via the tow hitch mount. I have visions of catching the hi-lift somewhere with the tow ball and ending up in a mess. >THINKS - 'Hmm, a bobtail would be even better. I wonder if...........' Don't want to go halves do you ;-) I've been toying with the idea of a bob-tail, maybe pick-up, for a few months (years really!), what with hammering the road car, etc. Having chatted to a few guys at Sundays event who romped around in a few old hammered RR pick-ups, I like it even more. The simple approach of an earlier RR would also be nice, my '90/91 RR is a bit too techie when something goes wrong ... Having glanced through this months LRW in my lunchtime (five bobtails on test!), the hankering is just getting worse ... now how can I sneak another RR past SWMBO's nose! >Cheers >Dave >would allow you to have a better angle than even my shortened towbar >allows. Thanks for the feedback ... Craig ------------------------------[ <- Message 16 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980508 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: M.J.Rooth@lboro.ac.uk (Mike Rooth) Date: Thu, 7 May 1998 16:51:31 +0000 Subject: Re: Painting SIII engine block My engine is originally a yukky pastel green (which i am sure has an >official name). Probably Yukky Pastel Green.....:-) Has anyone tried using hammerite for the engine block - my local farm implement workshop has a nice shade of green on stock - will Hammerite >be OK? I wouldnt use Hammerite,since it isnt oil or fuel proof,only waterproof. As Nate says,you need a heat resistant enamel of some sort. Mike Rooth ------------------------------[ <- Message 17 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980508 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: AKBLACKLEY <AKBLACKLEY@aol.com> Date: Thu, 7 May 1998 11:56:49 EDT Subject: Petrol Woes (wont run) Sounds like an ignition problem. The bad distributor cap is the most obvious. Check the points for evidence of grounding or arching, and be sure that the points are properly isolated at the mounting post. Also, if not correctly installed, the arched spring on the points can contact metal and ground out the points when the advance mechanism starts to work. Cheers, Andy Blackley ------------------------------[ <- Message 18 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980508 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: TeriAnn Wakeman <twakeman@cruzers.com> Date: Thu, 7 May 98 08:59:45 -0700 Subject: Re: 2.25 Petrol Woes :-( ;>The facts: 1964 petrol, recon head w/hardened seats ;> Zenith rebuilt carb, good exhaust and intake manifold ;> new cap,good coil, new rotor button, points and cond and plugs ;>The problem: It will not run very good ;> On start up, it will fire on the very first turn but only running ;>a few cylinders. Isolated the non-firing cyls as #1 and 2. Short #3 or 4 ;>and it drops rpm, but no change when shorting out 1 or 2. No difference ;>in rpm even when we took off the leads to both 1&2 at the same time. So, ;>we hooked them up again, brought up the revs to about 2000 and pulled the ;>leads off 3 , then 4. It ran, but not good. Drop in revs killed the ;>engine. Checked for fire in all leads, good. Changed plugs, cap, ;>switched wires, no difference. Compression test and all's well, about 150 ;>in each cyl. Vacuum leak, only a tiny bit around throttle shaft, made a ;>difference of about 100 rpm's with propane. After all tests were done, we ;>still ended up with an engine that only wants to run on 3 and 4. ;> Pleeeeezzze, any ideas??? Welllll Lets see. For a cylinder to fire it needs: - The piston going up & down - Enough compression to suck an air fuel mixture in, push exhaust out and to compress the air fuel mixture - Intake and exhaust valves opening and sealing at the right times - An air fuel mixture of a correct ratio pulled in on the intake stroke - A good strong point of ignition at the correct time Diagnosing the problem is a matter of checking each of these items to make sure that they function properly. I'm bothered by the mention that the problem is in two adjacent cylinders. This feels significant. There is a piece of information missing that could be significant. How did the problem appear? Did you do a valve job and now it doesn't work? Did you do a tuneup and now it doesn't work? Did it just happen as you were using the car after the reconditioned head was installed and you have added the tune up parts to fix the problem? Knowing the circumstances of how the symptoms appeared affect guesses as to who the lightly suspects are. For instance I have installed new parts that were faulty. Things like a genuine Land Rover flexible hose that had a crimp that closed off the hose inside and a distributor cap with a center spring missing so it did not ride against the rotor. You say that you have ran a compression check and everything was OK. did you do this with all the spark plugs out, or with one out and the other three in. There might be a piece of head gasket missing between cylinders 1 & 2. If you just installed the head something may have prevented a proper torque up front on the head. The front of the head is awfully close to the water pump. I once had a clearance problem there prevent a good head torque. If you ran your compression check with all the plugs out and all cylinders were close, compression is probably not the problem. If you have just placed the head on the engine, I would be tempted to pull the valve cover and have a friend turn the engine over with the crank while I watched the valves. This would be more easily done with the spark plugs out. Watch the intake and exhausts to make sure that they are acting like the others and that the open and closed heights look the same as the others. It could be that you might not have found the tappet socket with the 1 & 2 exhaust push rods. Or maybe something happened to cause the push rods to get bent. It never hurts to adjust the valves. You might have a valve adjusted too tight to close properly. So if you have assured yourself that you have proper compression across all cylinders and that your intake & exhaust valves look like they are opening and closing correctly look at the spark. Pull the #1 spark plug and connect it to the spark plug wire. Hold the plug at the thick rubber wire connector using an insulated tool. There are special plastic pliers for doing this. If you use the wrong tool you will get a shock. Place the plug next to the engine while turning the engine. You should see a strong blue spark between the plug and engine. If you do not get a spark or it is a yellow colour you have a problem in the ignition circuit. Oh you should check to make sure that the ground strap between the engine and frame is in place and has good connections. Engines have preformed poorly just because they did not have a good return path for th electricity. You did not mention replacing plug wires. It is possible that your front two plug wires have problems. Or there may be a problem getting electricity from the rotor through the cap contacts to the wires. Do this again for your #2 plug. You can use a known good cylinder for comparison. A way to cheat is to take the car to a shop and have them put it on a scope. They can tell you the condition of your ignition system in just a few minutes. If you have good compression, working valves, good strong blue sparks, the problem could be the fuel system. A partially clogged fuel system can behave remarkably like a ignition system problem. There was one time I spent all my spare time for a week futzing around with points and timing to try to cure what I KNEW to be an ignition caused problem. It cured itself instantly when I changed the fuel filter. One piece of information that you didn't mention was how the spark gap of the plugs looked. They can tell you a lot. Anyway, I think I have given you enough to keep diagnosing your problem. Just look carefully at each thing that needs to be at the cylinder for it to work properly. You will find it. Good luck TeriAnn Wakeman I subscribe to several high volume mail Santa Cruz, California Lists and do not read every posting. twakeman@cruzers.com If you send me direct mail, please start www.cruzers.com/~twakeman subject with TW- so I will know to read it. "How can life grant us the boon of living..unless we dare" Amelia Earhart 1898-1937 ------------------------------[ <- Message 19 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980508 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: TeriAnn Wakeman <twakeman@cruzers.com> Date: Thu, 7 May 98 08:59:38 -0700 Subject: Re: CBs ;>I reckon I ought to buy a CB before my journeys/rallys this summer. ;>Anyone have any strong opinions on brands to look for/avoid? ;>Should I just buy a cheapie @ WalMart? Hi Bill I am not a CB expert but I love to put my US$ 0.02 in ;*) When I went shopping I picked a CB capable of receiving the weather channels. This automatically put me in the mid range point. I use the weather channel each morning on trips when I'm in receiving distance of a weather transmitter. It seems that what you connect to a CD and how you do it may be more important than which brand you purchase. The itsy bitsy speaker inside the tiny radio case is difficult for me to understand. I installed a 5 X7 inch external voice speaker. It made a real improvement for me. There are a bunch of different kinds of antennas. Each have their advantages and disadvantages. You might browse through a book on CBs to find out that the tradeoffs are before you invest. I went with the long whip antenna. It can double as a flag pole in the dunes (as if a 5200 pound mobile home belongs in the sand dunes). Where you mount the antenna makes a difference. The body of the car acts as a ground plane and affects your antenna's receiving pattern. I mounted my antenna on the rear so that it would be least likely to be damaged by brush. My longest reception and transmitting distance is to the rear of the car. So if I want to communicate as far as possible, I point the car away from the direction I want to speak. Also this put my antenna and wire as far away from the engine as I could get it. Spark gaps are excellent transmitters on all frequencies. On the recent Border to Border trip I have someone mention that his radio only seemed to work properly when the engine was off. The antenna was mounted via an 'L' bracket to a windscreen base bolt. They neatly routed the antenna wire inside the engine compartment alongside the coil and through the bulkhead. I suggested that the ignition was the source of their static and that they could do a quick fix by rerouting the wire through a scuttle vent. It helped a great deal making the radio usable, but they still had to keep the squelch level up higher than I did and missed some of the weaker group conversations. The antenna needs to be tuned for maximum performance. With some antennas you adjust the length of the antenna buy cutting the tip off. On the long whip antenna, you do it by adjusting th length of the wire going between the antenna and the CB. You can by a meter, use it once & put it away until you get a new radio or new antenna or have a CD shop adjust it for you. It cost me less to have a CD shop tune mine then to purchase a meter. They added about 3 feet additional cable to tune it. On the border to border run, I was one of the cars that relayed messages from cars a distance away to some of my neighbor cars. On the other hand, I sometimes overloaded the receiver of a car right next to mine so they received a garbled transmission from me. You also want to make sure that you have a good electrical ground and power input for the radio. My alternator output voltage is higher than my battery voltage. I know I get out a lot stronger with the engine running than I do with the engine off. Whatever you choose if it works properly you get a new dimension to your trips being able to converse with others in your group. Anyway, that's my US$ 0.02 worth Take care! TeriAnn Wakeman I subscribe to several high volume mail Santa Cruz, California Lists and do not read every posting. twakeman@cruzers.com If you send me direct mail, please start www.cruzers.com/~twakeman subject with TW- so I will know to read it. "How can life grant us the boon of living..unless we dare" Amelia Earhart 1898-1937 ------------------------------[ <- Message 20 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980508 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Peter M. Kaskan" <pmk11@cornell.edu> Date: Thu, 7 May 1998 12:02:36 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Any trouble with UK parts distributors? Hi All - (Sorry if you get two copies - and if it's redundant) I'm planning on ordering some parts from the UK and having them sent to the US (NY). I've briefly checked the archives for prior related comments - but haven't seen much in the way of bad experiences. Are there any dealers I should watch out for? It sounds like people have had good luck with Craddocks and Blanchards. I'm looking into ordering: Front end bearings, bushings and seals (Should these be "original LR parts"? What dealers sell "original LR parts?" Is there a better aftermarket option?) Right rear quarter panel for 88in Ex-MoD - no fuel filler hole (1965 IIA) Rear panels Correct rivets for reassembly of 88in bed Full hoop set w/canvas Military pick and shovel w/brackets and hardware, and jerry can Do any of you know if I will be saving money on these things - after shipping and import taxes? I've checked around in the US and have been unable to find the military rear quarter panel - anybody out there have one? A few last questions - what does glazed and unglazed mean wrt body panels - is it just sprayed with primer? Do the workshop manuals have the micrometer dimentions of LR parts? Thanks in advance - reply to me directly if you think it isn't relevant to the others. Peter (there will soon be a LR in my basement) Kaskan ----------------------- Peter M. Kaskan Uris Hall 231 Dept. Of Psychology Cornell University 607-255-3382 pmk11@cornell.edu ----------------------- ------------------------------[ <- Message 21 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980508 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: NADdMD <NADdMD@aol.com> Date: Thu, 7 May 1998 12:12:23 EDT Subject: Re: 2.25 Petrol Woes :-( In a message dated 5/7/98 12:04:37 PM Eastern Daylight Time, teriann talks about testing sparkplug wires and holding them: << If you use the wrong tool you will get a shock. >> DAMN STRAIGHT! Working on my old Willys Jeepster, I held the cap in my hand, fired it up and shocked the hell out of myself. Small tear in the old insulation AWAY from the boot was still close enough to get me. I think my heart has been converted to negative earth now. Nate ------------------------------[ <- Message 22 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980508 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Dr R.D.Thomson" <rthomson@mech.gla.ac.uk> Date: Thu, 07 May 1998 17:11:07 +0100 Subject: parts suppliers in UK We've had good mail-order relations with AEW Paddock of Matlock. Ron Thomson Glasgow Uni Staff LR Club http:/www.mech.gla.ac.uk/~rthomson/guslrc ------------------------------[ <- Message 23 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980508 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Jeremy Bartlett <bartlett@slip.net> Date: Thu, 07 May 1998 09:23:43 -0700 Subject: Re: Any trouble with UK parts distributors? Peter M. Kaskan wrote: > I'm planning on ordering some parts from the UK (snip) Are there > any dealers I should watch out for? I've had excellent experience with Dingocroft and tend to go straight to themnow without getting alternative quotes from others. They've been very helpful and price competitive. I sometimes request quotes for all 3 of the following Genuine, Original Equipment Manufacture ("genuine without the LR label"), Aftermarket If you want parts quickly consider air freight rather than UPS or equivalent. I recently placed an order using air freight and it showed up quicker than the last one I placed using UPS and at about 1/3 the shipping cost. Using either surface or air freight for a significant number of parts will mean clearing customs and dealing with brokers. In my several experiences this has been extremeley straight forward but time consuming, but I live near a port city so I don't know how that might differ if you don't. > Do any of you know if I will be saving money on these things - after > shipping and import taxes? My cost savings have varied from 1/3 to close to 0 over both dealer and RNprices. Typically I'd say you're looking at saving between 25% and 50% depending on shipping choices and quantities. As an example I work at a LR dealership and get an employee discount (cost +10%). Even with that the cost of bushings was literally 1/3 from the UK! Most of my parts come from the UK. > Do the workshop manuals have the micrometer dimentions of LR > parts? Some of them (engine components mostly). cheers Jeremy ------------------------------[ <- Message 24 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980508 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Paul Quin <Paul_Quin@pml.com> Date: Thu, 7 May 1998 11:01:41 -0700 Subject: Rolls Royce again? (No LR) Hmm, just heard on CBC that Vickers has conditionally accepted an offer from VW for the purchase of Rolls-Royce! Guess Bavarian Motor Works couldn't dig up enough cash! Land Rover must be costing them too much :-) Paul in Victoria. ------------------------------[ <- Message 25 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980508 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Chris Dillard"<cdillard@Aholdusa.com> Date: Thu, 7 May 1998 14:20:06 -0400 Subject: Re: Rolls Royce again? (No LR) Speaking of buyouts and mergers, did anyone see on CBS last night the story about Chrysler and Dailer-Benz merging? Any thoughts? Cheers, Christopher Dillard Database Administrator Phone: 864-987-8633 BONUSCARD Marketing Fax: 864-675-5456 Ahold USA (BI-LO Inc.) E-Mail:cdillard@aholdusa.com Greenville SC USA ------------------------------[ <- Message 26 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980508 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: =?us-ascii?Q?Douglas_Bohme?= <schailey@uscom.com> Date: Thu, 7 May 1998 14:42:07 -0400 Subject: RE: Rolls Royce again? (No LR) A high priced yuppie-mobile with cab forward design? Douglas Boehme '95 Red D90 #2767 "Fritz" schailey@uscom.com ------------------------------[ <- Message 27 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980508 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Adrian Redmond <channel6@post2.tele.dk> Date: Thu, 07 May 1998 21:41:58 +0200 Subject: Re: Painting SIII engine block Exactly how HOT does a SIII diesel 2,25 ltr motorblock get? 200°C? or higher? Adrian Redmond CHANNEL 6 TELEVISION DENMARK (Adrian Redmond) Foerlevvej 6 Mesing DK-8660 Skanderborg Denmark telephone (office) +45 86 57 22 66 telephone (home) +45 86 57 22 64 telefacsimile / data +45 86 57 24 46 mobile GSM (EFP unit) +45 40 74 75 64 mobile GSM (admin) +45 40 54 22 66 mobile NMT +45 30 86 75 66 e-mail channel6@post2.tele.dk Visit our homepages! www.channel6.dk ------------------------------[ <- Message 28 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980508 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Clark, Patrick D." <Clark_PD@pillsburylaw.com> Date: Thu, 7 May 1998 14:56:50 -0700 Subject: RE: Rolls Royce again? (No LR) Gremlins for $50,000.00 ------------------------------[ <- Message 29 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980508 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Clark, Patrick D." <Clark_PD@pillsburylaw.com> Date: Thu, 7 May 1998 14:57:43 -0700 Subject: RE: Rolls Royce again? (No LR) right...sorry....these Gremlins..... ------------------------------[ <- Message 30 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980508 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Jarvis 64 <Jarvis64@aol.com> Date: Thu, 7 May 1998 20:19:17 EDT Subject: Re: Re: Any trouble with UK parts distributors? Peter, I recently thought about ordering some parts from the UK. I e-mailed Famous 4x4 and they were very prompt and helpful. However, the estimated shipping cost they quoted me was so high (70 pounds for tailgate alone, and 120 pounds for tailgate and 109 hoopset) that it completely negated any savings I would've gotten on the parts. So I didn't do it and am still looking on this side of the Atlantic. Bill Rice Watertown NY 64 109SW ------------------------------[ <- Message 31 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980508 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: NADdMD <NADdMD@aol.com> Date: Thu, 7 May 1998 20:55:18 EDT Subject: Transferbox low gear question Hi all, Just found an embarrassing mistake: After reassembling the transferbox and output shaft housing, I have now found that the low gear on the output shaft (straight cut gear with the groove for the selector fork) has 3 teeth which have some pitting rust on them--no chips or wear marks just rust like where they were out of the oil for a while (maybe 3 years). I talked with RN who said, probably should replace because you will never know when they might go since the hardened surface is missing there. Then I called British Bulldog (I can never get hold of BP) who said, wouldn't worry about it. Transfer boxes are very tough and the straight cut low gear was never intended to be all that quiet. If it's not chipped or obviously worn, don't change it, that's a very tough gear that gives very little problem. Obviously, I would rather just let it go--particularly since low range only gets used 10-12 times a year. I don't mind a little (even alot) extra noise but I don't want to have to get into the box again in the next 5-10 years for a broken gear. Anybody else have experience with this? Nate ------------------------------[ <- Message 32 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980508 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Con P. Seitl" <seitl@ns.sympatico.ca> Date: Thu, 07 May 1998 20:56:34 -0700 Subject: Petrol Woes, cont...... Hi all! Gotta thank all those that responded to my query. I'll try to answer all those questions in one post. Jim Hall asks if I "replaced the wires lately or adjusted the valves." The valves are/were adjusted properly, and also backed them off a bit to make sure that there was plenty of free space to see if one was sticking, hence the compression test. Also, the wires were switched from back to front to see if maybe there was a wire problem, but it still worked 'exactly the same' Andy Blackley asks about the dist. cap, and whether the points are properly isolated. The cap was an old one, then switched to another used one, then switched to a new one, and the end result was no change. However, grounding of the points was not checked, and that will be the first order of business on Saturday. ( Would it only affect certain pistons ?) Alan Richer asks about the compression test done without plugs in (yes). and yes, the wires were on correctly. ( It was the first thing we checked 3 weeks ago.)Also, the valve cover came off after frustration set in, and everything seems to be working properly. One of the things I did was to hold down the valve spring with a screwdriver while it was running and the cylinder on 3 & 4 died respectively, as was expected, but no difference was had on 1 & 2, which we knew wasn't firing anyway. Is gas getting to 1 & 2 ? I think so. The intake manifold was replaced with a good one (the old one was cracked), and one of the tests we did was to rev the engine up and pull #3 wire,(it dropped in RPM) and then #4 was pulled, it dropped further in RPM, coughed a little, but kept on running but badly.(We looked a each other and figured Dixon ain't got nothin on this baby, she's running on 2 dead cylinders and 2 disconnected ones!) Peter Kaskan asks if this is a new problem with my daily driver or if there's play in the dissy shaft. The LR we are trying to resurrect is an old beater my friend bought because he's tired of sitting shotgun in mine. The engine ran bad from the outset. The head was cracked, so another head was reconed at UAP, hardened seats etc, lapped and installed with new head gasket. ( I wasn't there for that part, so I don't know how it was torqued) The carb was no good, so a Zenith was redone and installed, as was a fuel pump. ( it works great) There is no oil in the coolant, or vice versa. The dissy was from a donor vehicle, and there is no play in it. As far as there being a blockage in the intake, I dunno, can't see it happening in this case as a good one was put on there with new gaskets. And TeriAnn takes the time to write me an essay! Hey, why don't you just saddle up and make one of those neat trips up our way, maybe fix an engine or so while your here! So here goes: Most of your questions to me are answered by now. At the start, with this crappy running engine, a trip was made in the woods with some other LR's. It preformed pretty damn good as far as mud and terrain was concerned, only running on a few cylinders. (We didn't start to look at making it run better until after the trip). That's when we started with the redone head, carb etc. Now, if the engine problem can be sorted out, he's going to finish rebuilding the Rover to make it street legal. My thoughts were that the problem was electrical, but with the strong fire at all cylinders I'm not so sure. That's why we tried different coils and changed the wires around, to see if we could isolate it. Now, I'm thinking that maybe there might be a connection between Pos and Neg ground. Maybe this thing was Pos and all the wiring was changed to Neg by the PO. The PO was the kinda guy that would use a hammer and spike to put a wing back on a bird to fix it, so anything is possible. Another thought was the valve train, but the compression tests ruled that out. Cracked block?, the compression test should also show that, but as another test to do would be a leak-down test. I got the tester, so I might as well try a test on the weekend. You mention bad fuel filters. Ok, could be a problem, as I know that there is water in there somewhere, (I can see droplets in the inline) and he's been running the LR with a rag stuffed in the fill pipe. We'll start the weekend with a five gallon jug of fresh gas and new fuel filters so as to bypass the fuel tank. My question is though, why would it only create a problem with #'s 1&2 cylinders? By all acccounts, this engine should run pretty good, so it is really baffling. We'll try the ideas provided, and hopefully this LR will soon be making ruts again. Thanks all !! Muchly appreciated!! PS. The Rover was officially named last weekend by its owner. The only printable name that came out was "Reject". So I guess you could say it's alive, barely. Con Seitl 1973 III 88 "Pig" ------------------------------[ <- Message 33 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980508 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "John C. Hinkle" <defender110@email.msn.com> Date: Thu, 7 May 1998 20:04:42 -0500 Subject: Re: Transferbox low gear question Send David Ashcroft a query. He runs Auto Conversions in the UK. Email info@autoconv.com Chris Hinkle ------------------------------[ <- Message 34 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980508 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "MARY THOMSON" <denthomson@sprint.ca> Date: Thu, 7 May 1998 21:43:58 -0400 Subject: Re: 101' prices Who would want a 101. If you can get them to go that in it's self is a challenge, and the ones that I have seen get stuck in parking lots and get washed down little streams. Or was that a big stream, and a wet parking lot. ---------- > From: William L. Leacock <wleacock@pipeline.com> > To: lro@playground.sun.com > Subject: 101' prices > Date: Wednesday, May 06, 1998 9:25 PM > $30k for a 101!! Wow, > 101's can be purchased in the UK for between $5000 and $10,000 , LRW and [ truncated by list-digester (was 11 lines)] > LROI are full of ads for them. shipping in a container will cost a few > thousand, I was quoted $4k for a 20 foot from the UK to my door in NY. Nice > business if you can get it !! > Bill Leacock ( Limey in exile ) NY USA. > 88 and 109 LR's and 89 RR > Date: Wednesday, May 06, 1998 9:25 PM ------------------------------[ <- Message 35 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980508 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: David Cockey <dcockey@tir.com> Date: Thu, 07 May 1998 21:47:07 -0400 Subject: Re: Any trouble with UK parts distributors? Peter M. Kaskan wrote: > rear quarter panel - anybody out there have one? A few last questions > - > what does glazed and unglazed mean wrt body panels - is it just > sprayed > with primer? Do the workshop manuals have the micrometer dimentions of > LR > parts? Glazed means with glass installed, unglazed means without for panels with windows. The LR workshop manuals have dimensions needed during the maintenance operations, including checking critical parts for wear. The SII/SIIA manuals include metric equivalents. The LR manuals are the most complete and thorough, though not perfect. But if you plan to do your own maintenance invest in a set along with the relevant parts book. The parts book illustrations are worthwhile just to understand what you're getting into, and when you need to order parts being able to specify a part number is very valuable. Regards, David Cockey ------------------------------[ <- Message 36 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980508 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: David Cockey <dcockey@tir.com> Date: Thu, 07 May 1998 21:57:33 -0400 Subject: Re: Rolls Royce again? (LR content) Chris Dillard wrote: > Speaking of buyouts and mergers, did anyone see on CBS last night the > story > about Chrysler and Dailer-Benz merging? Any thoughts? Jeep could become much stronger in Europe with assistance from Daimler, and seriously affect LR sales. However, getting the two organizations working together with their vastly different cultures will take concerted effort. Regards, David Cockey ------------------------------[ <- Message 37 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980508 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "d.h.lowe" <dhlowe@idirect.com> Date: Thu, 07 May 1998 10:39:01 -0400 Subject: Re: 101' prices You whining immigrants are all the same. Jealous thats what..........and it was a very deep river that our resident water baby got stuck in.. John C. you will not believe what Aqua Man Tollefson did on his recent trip out West. A story to put Calabogie in the shade. We will save it for the 50th. and yes it was a very slippy parking lot. MARY THOMSON wrote: > Who would want a 101. If you can get them to go that in it's self is a > challenge, and the ones that I have seen get stuck in parking lots and get > washed down little streams. Or was that a big stream, and a wet parking > lot. > ---------- > > From: William L. Leacock <wleacock@pipeline.com> > > To: lro@playground.sun.com [ truncated by list-digester (was 16 lines)] > > Bill Leacock ( Limey in exile ) NY USA. > [ truncated by lro-lite (was 7 lines)] ------------------------------[ <- Message 38 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980508 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: eheite@dmv.com (Ned Heite) Date: Thu, 7 May 1998 22:56:13 -0500 Subject: acquisitions The BBC World Service business correspondent was bubbling smugly Thursday morning about all the Germanic business logic behind automotive mega-mergers, smugly comparing the Chrysler-J**p-Daimler-Benz-Unimog merger and the takeover of Rolls Royce and Rover by that nasty little German motorbike company. As a consolation prize, the BBC commentator said, at least Volkswagen got Skoda! Were they equating Rover with Skoda and J**p? Anyway, before the day was out, it was announced that VW had bought Rolls after all, with a sweetened offer. _____ ___(_____) |Baby the\ Most problems in life have a single right |1969 Land\_===__ solution and a single wrong solution, only | ___Rover ___|o one of which may involve duct tape. |_/ . \______/ . || ___\_/________\_/________________________________________________ Ned Heite, Camden, DE http://home.dmv.com/~eheite/index.html ------------------------------[ <- Message 39 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980508 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "d.h.lowe" <dhlowe@idirect.com> Date: Thu, 07 May 1998 10:58:07 -0400 Subject: Re: Painting SIII engine block We use Detroit Diesel Alpine Green which is almost identical to the Military colour. Lasts O.K and makes it easier to keep the thing clean. Adrian Redmond wrote: > What does the book of experience say about painting engine blocks? > I have a completly naked frame and motor at the moment, so the paint job > will be easy, before the new firewall is fitted. > My engine is originally a yukky pastel green (which i am sure has an > official name). > I am not worried about originality, I just want a clean, light glossy [ truncated by list-digester (was 36 lines)] > e-mail channel6@post2.tele.dk > Visit our homepages! www.channel6.dk ------------------------------[ <- Message 40 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980508 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: CIrvin1258 <CIrvin1258@aol.com> Date: Fri, 8 May 1998 01:34:40 EDT Subject: Re: Any trouble with UK parts distributors? I usually deal with Paddock, though the young lady that used to take care of me (Victoria) isn't there anymore, and the folks working without her, still seem to be learning the ropes! They do try, though, and their prices are good. I emailed Famous 4 once, and it took them 3 weeks to answer! By that time, I already had received the parts from Paddock! I've heard good things about Blanchard, and I'd guess that they're the ones to talk to, if you have an ex-MOD truck, and their prices are great. Always remember: Ask if the parts are genuine or aftermarket, and if possible, choose a supplier near London...the farther away from London, the more expensive shipping can be to the USA (I once had some parts FedExed from Ripspeed, and it was CHEAPER than having parts UPSed from Paddock!). Also - if the shipment is UNDER $400.00 in value, there's no duty, and if it's over $400, then it's .02%. Make sure that everybody understands how the parts will be shipped (I.E. UPS, FedEx, air cargo, etc.), as my S-3 tranny that I just got, was supposed to be sent air freight, and consigned to myself DIRECTLY. What ended up happening, is that the shipment was send as a consol, to a freight forwarder!. It ended up costing me another $65.00. Charles ------------------------------[ <- Message 41 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980508 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Said Geoffrey at MITTS" <Geoffrey.Said@magnet.mt> Date: Fri, 8 May 1998 07:53:29 +0100 Subject: RE:Re: 2.25 to 2.5 or 2.6L Diesel But it can be fitted. Here in Malta we fit also the Turbo diesel and if am not mistaken even the TDI engine in a Series III. Thanks Geoffrey Elwyn York: >To: Adrian Redmond <channel6@post2.tele.dk> >Ok, I checked with a freind. Basically the answer is NO. The 2.5L D will >NOT fit into a series 2/3 motor, as the Bellhousing on the g/box is the >wrong shape. There may be other changes as well but as i have never tried >it i dont know. >2nd. There is a company in "Preens Edy" in Shropshire, called "Phillips" [ truncated by list-digester (was 19 lines)] >Landrover S3 Lightweight >Elwyny@mailshuttle.com ------------------------------[ <- Message 42 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980508 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Rovergo <Rovergo@aol.com> Date: Fri, 8 May 1998 03:11:05 EDT Subject: 2 dead holes Con, does your rover have brake booster? if so could be vacume leak in servo. with stock rover plumbing this affects 1-2 most and at idle would be worst is also hard to locate servo leak with propane as leak would most likly be in peddle box around pushrod. Pat Young 65 11a 88 rhd. ------------------------------[ <- Message 43 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980508 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Richard Marsden"<rmarsden@digicon-egr.co.uk> Date: Fri, 8 May 1998 08:21:40 +0100 Subject: Re: Rolls Royce again? (No LR) Now that's interesting, I heard that on the radio today, but not the VW-RR thing... Richard (ex-Gurkha SIII 109 FFR) cdillard@aholdusa.com on 05/07/98 07:20:06 PM Please respond to lro@playground.sun.com cc: (bcc: Richard Marsden/EAME/VDGC) Subject: Re: Rolls Royce again? (No LR) Speaking of buyouts and mergers, did anyone see on CBS last night the story about Chrysler and Dailer-Benz merging? Any thoughts? Cheers, Christopher Dillard Database Administrator Phone: 864-987-8633 BONUSCARD Marketing Fax: 864-675-5456 Ahold USA (BI-LO Inc.) E-Mail:cdillard@aholdusa.com Greenville SC USA ------------------------------[ <- Message 44 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980508 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Con P. Seitl" <seitl@ns.sympatico.ca> Date: Fri, 08 May 1998 05:48:42 -0700 Subject: Re: 2 dead holes Rovergo wrote: > Con, does your rover have brake booster? if so could be vacume leak in servo. > with stock rover plumbing this affects 1-2 most and at idle would be worst is > also hard to locate servo leak with propane as leak would most likly be in > peddle box around pushrod.. It's a 1964, no servo unit. Although the intake manifold is off a Series III, we made sure that extra port was well sealed. The intake was thoroughly checked before installation, but it was visual, not pressure tested.(if you can do such a thing) Con Seitl 1973 III 88 "Pig" ------------------------------[ <- Message 45 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980508 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Alan_Richer@motorcity2.lotus.com Date: Fri, 8 May 1998 06:46:33 -0400 Subject: Re: Transferbox low gear question Re: Swap it or tolerate it: Tolerate it. Rust pitting is no nightmare, even though not the greatest thing due to potential stress fractures. Thetransfer case is simple to disassemble/reassemble in the truck anyway... ajr ------------------------------[ <- Message 46 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980508 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
END OF * LIST DIGEST Input: messages 45 lines 2113 [forwarded 161 whitespace 0] Output: lines 1516 [content 1320 forwarded 104 (cut 57) whitespace 0][ First Message | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980508 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Digest Messages Copyright 1990-1999 by the original poster or/and Empire Rover Owners Society, All rights reserved. Photos & text Copyright 1990-1999 Bill Caloccia, All rights reserved. Empire/LRO List of charges for Empire/LRO Policies
against the distribution of unsolicited commercial e-mail (aka SPAM).
|
![]() |
|||
<--Back |
HOME |
TOP |
Forward --> |
|