[ First Message Last | Table of Contents | <- Digest -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Alan_Richer@motorcity2.lotus.com Date: Fri, 30 Jan 1998 05:04:25 -0500 Subject: Re: Ammeter range conversion / wire gauges for 12-volt service Peter, this isn't an easy thing to do - it takes steady hands and a fine touch. What I essentially did was to reduce the magnetic field inside the meter to reduce the vane movement. If you remove one of these meters from the triple-gauge, you'll see it's constructed essentially as I described - a wire loop and a magnetic vane. We're going to leave the vane alone, but the loop is fair game. The loop is anchored to the end pieces by a fork/split in the end pieces, which has the wire inserted into it and is then staked /resistance welded to hold the wire in place. Rather than go to all that trouble, I used a pair of dikes and cut the wire away from the end posts. I then sawed through the split in the mountings and filed away the old wire best I could, without disturbing the relation of the posts to the vane. A new piece of 12 AWG solid wire was then cut to fit between the posts WITHOUT A LOOP (essentially reducing the length of the wire by 2/3), placed between the forks and silver-soldered into place with a Micronox torch. Like I said, this ain't for the faint of heart - or those with caffiene shakes....8*) I tested it on a resistor bank, and my initial guess on what the calibration was to be was right - it ended up about X3 of the original. And for those objecting to pushing 60 amps through a 12 AWG wire - realize that 60 amps at 13.8 volts is only 828 watts - a 20-amp residential service at 115 volts is pushing 2.3KW through essentially the same wire. If you look at a GM harness you'll realize that the 12 AWG wire is not far off these alternators. Do the math - the wire cross-section and such is well within acceptable parameters. it would be better if it was stranded, but that would make a right proper mess of the magnetic field, wouldn't it? ajr/Mr. Churchill ------------------------------[ <- Message 2 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980131 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 1998 20:47:06 +0700 (ICT) From: "John M. Baker" <jbaker@ksc8.th.com> Subject: Installing Dist/Cam Gear (fwd) ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Thu, 29 Jan 1998 21:18:19 +0700 (ICT) From: "John M. Baker" <jbaker@ksc8.th.com> Subject: Installing Dist/Cam Gear (fwd) Posted below a few days ago and did not see any response. Would be very grateful to anyone who could answer my question (s) re timing. Thanks, John Baker Bangkok ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Mon, 26 Jan 1998 00:59:15 +0700 (ICT) From: "John M. Baker" <jbaker@ksc8.th.com> Subject: Installing Dist/Cam Gear Have another technical question here concerning the dist/cam gear and engine timing. Hope I am not disturbing any list subscribers with a technical question of this sort:) I have a 109 Station Wagon (1976) with the 2.25 petrol engine. I have the type of timing pointer which has three points, a gap, and then another point (as pictured on page 3.12 of the Haynes Service and Repair Manual). Under the installation procedure on pages 1.15 and 1.16 another timing point with three evenly spaced pointers is shown. Question is as follows: The Haynes book is really confusing as to where to line up the mark on the crankshaft pulley with which point on the timing pointer. In different sections it says use different pointers depending on the fuel you are using, in another it says it is dependent on the octane of fuel you are using, and in yet another it talks about LRs equipped with pollution control equipment! For starters, I have no pollution control equipment (Thailand). I am also not sure if I have an 8:1 or 7:1 head. I would appreciate any advice on which pointer I should line up with the pulley mark when installing the dist/cam gear. I should mention that I will probably be using 88 plus octane no lead fuel over here. Thanks in advance for any help! One more thing, I am now an expert on installing the dist/cam gear getting the hole to line up with the grub screw! Several tips I learned the hard way: 1. It is possible to drive the assembly in too deep and the hole in the bush will be too low for the grub screw. Knock it down slowly and feel for the hole with a small implement of some sort inserted through the grub screw hole. 2. If the bush is too tight in the bore you will never get it up again (the dist/cam gear assembly that is) if you make a mistake, and will have to remove the pan and oil pump to knock it back out. My original unit was a good slip fit, my new replacement was not. I used some very fine emery paper to smooth it down a bit to where it slipped in but did not move from side to side, which makes lining up the hole easier. 3. Inserting a wooden dowel into the shaft of the dist/cam gear allows you to easily remove it if you don't line the hole up right, which will almost certainly be the case a number of times, unless you are much luckier or smarter than I am! Once the grub screw is in you can wiggle the stick out. 4. If for any reason you decide to try to remove the c-clip inside, it will probably break (don't even ask why I know this!) Regards, John Baker Bangkok ------------------------------[ <- Message 3 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980131 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Alan_Richer@motorcity2.lotus.com Date: Fri, 30 Jan 1998 06:17:00 -0500 Subject: Re: Installing Dist/Cam Gear (fwd) Hohn, The basic settings are as follows(per the old manual) For a 7:1 engine running Premium fuel, 6 BTDC (third one back before the notch) Regular fuel calls for 3 BTDC Anything uglier than that - adjust it till it stops pinging....8*( If you're engine's new enough to have the pointer on the front cover, time it with a light at 800 RPM warm with the vacuum disconnected. For an 8:1 engine, manual calls for 6 ATDC and doesn't call out as much info on the octanes. Personally, I run 89 octane fuel in a 7:1 at about 9BTDC, adjusted at 800RPM with the vacuum to the distributor disconnected. The LR settings are conservative - Jim Allen's done plug chop tests and says that up to 10 or 12 degrees can sometimes be used. ajr/Mr. C. ------------------------------[ <- Message 4 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980131 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Tony Treace <atreace@HASimons.com> Subject: RE: Selectro hubs Date: Fri, 30 Jan 1998 06:23:35 -0800 > I'm going to be tearing into to front end of my '65 IIA and well, does > anyone have any tips on how to get past a set of selectro hubs? On mine, you just remove the two or three little screws on the side of the rotating cap to get at the castle nut on the front axle. > They look simple enough (relative to other makes of hub I've > dismantled) but > I haven't been able to locate any schematics or gasket kits for these > buggers. Any hints, tips, techniques, words of wisdom, advice, or > warnings would be greatly appreciated. Try British Bulldog at 888-874-3888. Their Fall 1997 flyer advertised Selectro hubs for $99.95/pair. Maybe they have rebuild kits as well. Hope this helps, Tony Treace atreace@hasimons.com 1967 109 SW 1951 80 HT ------------------------------[ <- Message 5 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980131 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 1998 09:31:35 -0500 From: ps4330@okc01.jccbi.gov (Peter Schauss x 2014) Subject: importing My son is currently studying at the Univeristy of Madrid and has suggested the possibility that we try to import a Land Rover. He says that they are quite common in Spain and thinks that we should be able to get one for a good price. >From my reading of the Land Rover web site, as well as the U.S. Customs Service site, it appears that if I get a 1973 or earlier with a diesel engine I should be able to bring it in and register it without any problems. Has anyone on the list actually done this? If so, I would be interested to hear how you did it. Thanks, Peter (do I realy need another British car?) Schauss ps4330@okc01.jccbi.gov schauss@worldnet.att.net 1963 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II 1980 MGB ------------------------------[ <- Message 6 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980131 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 1998 06:56:42 -0800 From: John Hong <jhong@best.com> Subject: OVLR Dork Tari Award snippy >It is to be painted, he continues: "BARBIE CORVETTE PINK" snippy >Pictures for all of us to view (and judge) will, no doubt, be posted at >some website like www.badtasterovercompetition.com. The prize for the >winner of this competition should be a tasteful velvet painting of Elvis. Connecticut Commie Yankee Man tips his feeble pinko plan! HAH! You're going to use a toy design esthetic and expect to win?!?! Against moi??? Why don't you just concede the title, don't waste the pink paint and consider donating it for the Clinton Presidential Library. Do you know where I was the last couple of days??? I was IN LAS VEGAS at the LIBERACE MUSEUM by personal invitation from the Curator! Do you even know what a sequin is? Or the role it can play in the automotive decorative vocabulary? Who do you think came up with the purple neon light under your car concept??? ahem... I am also consulting with the Hormel Corporation for their upcoming Performance Art Segment "Mary had a little lamb wham baaam thank you spam BLueCan i am..." As for the judging, apologies Paul Denver but I do believe this is the jurisdiction of the OVLR OTT committee. You wanna judge something, start your own contest. You an OVLR member or you wun of them commies two? As for your prize suggestion/offer...yeah right, "tasteful velvet"...sheesh, is that with or without UV paint?? NOw a lamb tongue or tuna eyeball sealed in resin for a paperweight...that's a prize! Scotty beam me up NOW! I am surrounded by commie pinko amateurs!!! ------------------------------[ <- Message 7 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980131 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: rovah@agate.net Date: Fri, 30 Jan 1998 10:01:00 -0500 (EST) Subject: Offer to post "how to" write ups.... Seems like lots of good advice on how to do certain projects lately. If anyone would like to have details and pics on a certain aspect of Rover care posted on the web, the DELRC would be happy to do it. Just e-mail me text and JPGs and I'll put it up. Alternator conversions, storage devices, routine service. Anything that seems to be a recurring theme on the internet list. I know that I do a lot better with visual information(pics and diagrams), than I do with a verbal/written description. Alan Richer helped me with some electrical problems over the net last year, but I still haven't dared return to the truck to hook the ammeter up! Guess I'll have to figure out how to break the weld holding the vice grips to the battery post first! ;-) Regards, John John Cassidy Bangor, Maine USA The Downeast Land Rover Club, <http://www.agate.net/~rovah/> X0 of the V(irtual)MFA 323th Cougars/Flying GSC's F/A-18 Hornet game 2 Wheels: Ducati M900, Velocette Thruxton, Moto Morini 350S 4 Wheels: 1998 Discovery-"Chukka", 1987 Range Rover-"Smedley," 1966 Series IIA 88", 1972 Series III 88"-"SWAMBO" ------------------------------[ <- Message 8 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980131 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: dbobeck@inetgate.ushmm.org Date: Fri, 30 Jan 98 08:43:04 EST Subject: Re[2]: 101 production (was US 25 year import rule) > Well when I talked to customs in Washington they told me that nothing >which was EX-MOD could be imported no matter what year it was. They >were very very clear about it as well. FYI Interesting. I'd like to see the documentation of that rule. Bet they can't produce it. Cheers Dave ------------------------------[ <- Message 9 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980131 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 1998 07:11:59 -0800 From: Todd_Wilson@ccmail.columbia.com (Todd Wilson) Subject: Hub ID With the talk of Selectro hub's going around I was curious if anyone could help identify the free wheel hubs on my truck. They are Cylindrical much like the rear axle hub on a domestic 3/4 ton truck. The face is flat and has two small circles diametrically opposed. Each of these has a screwdriver (coin) slot with an arrow on it. Turning each of these so the arrow points in locks the hub. Obviously, turning the arrows out unlocks the hub. I don't see any manufacturers name on the hub. thoughts or ideas??? tew ------------------------------[ <- Message 10 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980131 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 1998 09:22:15 -0800 From: Peter <nosimport@mailbag.com> Subject: Re: delco altenator Garret Scott wrote: > Perhaps my design criteria is different from other Rover owners. I want > my vehicle to be reliable. I want any changes or enhancements I make to > be designed properly. In the arena of electrical systems especially, I > want my Rover to be at least equal to how it was originally designed, if > not stronger. God knows, the Prince of Darkness has an easy enough time > like it is. But then on the other hand, some times you can go a long > way on a shoestring and a prayer. [ truncated by list-digester (was 11 lines)] > Garret Scott > Knoxville, TN (With 24 to 32 inches of snow in the Gatlinburg area) Garret, I couldn't agree more! I find that anal originality (while interesting) is contrary to the spirit of the Land Rover. One of the most desireable qualities of the Landie (at least what attracted me and many farmers and the Brit. & NATO military) is the in-field repairabilty and modifiability. I have lived in and worked from my '60 109. When the floor dimmer switch shorted and burned my sneakers (long story) I rewired with oil/waterproof 10ga. 8 bundle cable routed through the frame. Long time ago and still works. Did the (Ford) alternator conversion in '72...still works...etc,etc. Now I've got 4 of 'em and haul wood, manure, whatever.... great "Workhorses of the World". But, Everyone should enjoy them by whatever makes you smile. Cheers Peter '60 109 SW, 64 '88, '71 88,'73 88, & 1 ugly Champ! http://www.mailbag.com/users/nosimport/ ------------------------------[ <- Message 11 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980131 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Subject: Re: 101 production (was US 25 year import rule) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 1998 08:52:04 -0800 (PST) From: "Michael Fredette" <mfredett@ichips.intel.com> I looked at the ATF web site yesterday, and found a copy of the law governing import and export of military items (the title of the law says export only, but it covers import also, and ATF covers import only). It listed all kinds of restricted items, some obvious like nuclear weapons and destroyers, and others not so obvious. One class of items was military vehicles, and a quick look suggested a vehicle without gun mounts, etc., non-amphibious and unarmoured was not included in the restricted list. However, permission can be granted by ATF for many classes of restricted items, and an importer's license cost around $250/yr. Certain types of firearms and other weapons, goods furnished to foreign governments under military aid programs, and some other classes have blanket prohibitions. Also military goods from certain countries have blanket prohibitions, but the UK was not one of the countries. There were also several open letters to importers posted about changes to various regulations and how ATF was working to assist importers. One even announced that ATF now had an office dedicated to assisting importers of military goods. Regards, David Cockey In reference to the above check out http://members.aol.com/milveh/INDEX.html This is Lionheart Vehicles, and I purchased my 101 from Greg. No affiliation just a satisfied customer. The ATF rules are how they bring these vehicles in. ------------------------------[ <- Message 12 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980131 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Richard Marsden"<rmarsden@digicon-egr.co.uk> Date: Fri, 30 Jan 1998 17:00:36 +0000 Subject: Re: 101 production (was US 25 year import rule) > Also military goods from certain countries >have blanket prohibitions, but the UK was not one of the countries. Rather a good thing, considering the US Army drives Land Rovers, and the USAF flies British aircraft... Richard (ex-Gurkha SIII 109 FFR) ------------------------------[ <- Message 13 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980131 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 1998 12:06:45 -0500 From: "A. P. \"Sandy\" Grice" <rover@pinn.net> Subject: True colors Alan Richer wrote: >The point today is the paint and trim. >Pink. >Serious PINK. DAMN PINK. >BARBIE CORVETTE PINK, to be precise. Damn, Alan, you are one sick puppy! ;-) My 16 y.o. daughter wants a lightweight, but she wants it in CAMO! Cheers ------------------------------[ <- Message 14 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980131 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 1998 12:06:43 -0500 From: "A. P. \"Sandy\" Grice" <rover@pinn.net> Subject: Listing Martin Faure wrote: >Do all Series III's list slightly to the right and I've just never noticed it >during the past 25 years? 3) What might I have inadvertently done wrong when >installing the replacement springs back in the 1980s that has caused the >list? In a word: Yes. I've owned mine since new, and it has always listed, except the last time out, I swapped the springs, and now it lists to the *right*. It depends upon where you bought your springs last time. In the UK, driver and gas tank are on the same side, so "drivers" side springs have a greater arch. In the US, the two cancel each other, so Rovers North (and presumably other suppliers) sell only the "drivers" kind for both sides. Remember that when fitting spring shackles, you dont's want the shackle plate drawn up tight against the bush - it has to be able to move and do it's job....otherwise, the springs may get 'pre-loaded' and prone to an early demise. Cheers ------------------------------[ <- Message 15 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980131 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 1998 11:58:15 -0500 From: "Adams, Bill" <badams@usia.gov> Subject: Re: Hub ID I had these same hubs on my 54 and 55 Willys 4WD station wagons. I have no info on them, but they worked well enough for me. Cleaned and regreased them and had no trouble. Now the Super Hurricane 6,...THAT gave me trouble. Bill Adams 3D Artist/Animator '66 Land Rover S2A 109 Diesel Station Wagon, '81 Honda Goldwing 1100 Standard: "Practicing the ancient oriental art of ren-ching" ------------------------------[ <- Message 16 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980131 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 1998 12:06:46 -0500 From: "A. P. \"Sandy\" Grice" <rover@pinn.net> Subject: kill switches Mark wrote: > Has any one out there wired an electric fuel pump so it will stop if you >are involved in an accident . I believe all EFI vehicles ('95 and later RR, Disco's and Defenders) have just such a kill switch in the engine compartment. It also makes an effective de-mobilizer for anti-theft. Just rap it with a screw driver handle to trigger it and push the button to re-set it. Cheers ------------------------------[ <- Message 17 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980131 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Richard Marsden"<rmarsden@digicon-egr.co.uk> Date: Fri, 30 Jan 1998 17:08:52 +0000 Subject: Re: Listing Also, the main gearbox is off-centre. I only noticed this, when I realised my floor panels were different sizes. The gearbox is offset to the left. Hence, the engine must be off-centre too, although I've never really noticed it to be honest. To complicate your maths, I have two fuel tanks, and I'm skinny. :-) Richard (ex-Gurkha SIII 109 FFR) rover@pinn.net on 01/30/98 05:06:43 PM Please respond to lro@playground.sun.com cc: (bcc: Richard Marsden/EAME/VDGC) Subject: Listing Martin Faure wrote: >Do all Series III's list slightly to the right and I've just never noticed it >during the past 25 years? 3) What might I have inadvertently done wrong when >installing the replacement springs back in the 1980s that has caused the >list? In a word: Yes. I've owned mine since new, and it has always listed, except the last time out, I swapped the springs, and now it lists to the *right*. It depends upon where you bought your springs last time. In the UK, driver and gas tank are on the same side, so "drivers" side springs have a greater arch. In the US, the two cancel each other, so Rovers North (and presumably other suppliers) sell only the "drivers" kind for both sides. Remember that when fitting spring shackles, you dont's want the shackle plate drawn up tight against the bush - it has to be able to move and do it's job....otherwise, the springs may get 'pre-loaded' and prone to an early demise. Cheers ------------------------------[ <- Message 18 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980131 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 1998 13:14:42 -0400 From: john cranfield <john.cranfield@ns.sympatico.ca> Subject: Delco alternator Yesterday some mentioned a Demolition Derby site that has a page on wiring the Delco Alternator. Well sorry to say the writer has it wrong. The Field wire is the one that goes to the Idiot Light and is switched. The sensing wire should not go to a light as this would show the wrong voltage to the regulator resulting in over charging. This likely would not matter is the usual 10 min run of a Derby but for the longer periods that we attempt to run Land Rovers could cause a number of problems like boiled batteries and burned lights and toasted wiring. Not the best menu. I have been running a 110 amp Delco for many years with great success but I do not have the little ampmeter in the cluster rather I use an 80 amp add on gauge as well as a volt meter. John and Muddy ------------------------------[ <- Message 19 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980131 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Paul Quin <Paul_Quin@pml.com> Subject: RE: Listing Date: Fri, 30 Jan 1998 09:19:07 -0800 Most Land Rovers that I've seen seem to list away from what ever direction they were turning last. ;-) Paul. >-----Original Message----- >From: A. P. "Sandy" Grice [SMTP:rover@pinn.net] >Sent: Friday, January 30, 1998 9:07 AM >To: lro@playground.sun.com >Subject: Listing [ truncated by list-digester (was 26 lines)] >it's job....otherwise, the springs may get 'pre-loaded' and prone to an >early demise. Cheers ------------------------------[ <- Message 20 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980131 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Chris Dillard"<cdillard@Aholdusa.com> Date: Fri, 30 Jan 1998 12:30:07 -0500 FYI Just rec'd my Jerry cans from Lionheart Vehicles ($12 each) and they are what he said they are. I got 2 (shipping and all $36). When I opened one up it still had about 2qts of petrol in it. I guess this is a testament to the performance of the can. If UPS can ship it w/ gas inside and not reject the shipment It will handle almost any OR driving. There even that lovely Camo green. Just thought I would share. Chris 91 RR County G-ville SC __ __ __ |__|__|__| //__|__|__\___ \__ - ____ - _|} (_) (_) ------------------------------[ <- Message 21 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980131 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 1998 11:59:50 -0600 From: "Searle, Philip A. AP" <Philip.Searle@abbott.com> Subject: Mainshaft Nut tool web site :> The information on the mainshaft nut tool including the picture can now be :> found at <http://www.landrover.net/parts/transtool/> ::I'm having trouble reaching this site, anyone else, or is it just my :'puter? I can get as far as the link for "1/2 inch" and "hex nut", but :that's it :-( There is an error on the website, the links for the pictures have an extra period at the end of the I.P. address. Manually delete it in your browser's address box and then you can then see the pictures just fine. I looked at them yesterday, this is a very useful site, thanks to all concerned. Phil Searle '67 IIA 88" ------------------------------[ <- Message 22 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980131 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 1998 10:30:40 -0800 From: Michael Carradine <cs@landrover.net> Subject: Re: Mainshaft Nut tool web site At 11:59 AM 1/30/98, Searle, Philip A. <Philip.Searle@abbott.com> wrote: ::> The information on the mainshaft nut tool including the picture can ::> now be found at <http://www.landrover.net/parts/transtool/> : :There is an error on the website, the links for the pictures have an :extra period at the end of the I.P. address. Manually delete it in your :browser's address box and then you can then see the pictures just fine. : :I looked at them yesterday, this is a very useful site, thanks to all :concerned. Hmmm... the extra dots have been taken out and hopefully the page will load properly now. Thanks for the bug report! Odd how my Netscape 2.02 browser just ignored the error and loaded the page(?). -Michael 'on the hunt for other dots' Carradine ------------------------------[ <- Message 23 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980131 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: DONOHUEPE@aol.com Date: Fri, 30 Jan 1998 13:41:32 -0500 (EST) Subject: Electrical Question re: Electrical Question Jeff Jackson inquired about installing radios in his SIII 88 Luxury Edition. In addition to the fuzes recommended by aj "sparks R us" r, you might wish to consider using circuit breakers to protect your Stereo and CB installation. Small, thermal, pop-out breakers are inexpensive and readily available at Radio Shack, Parts America, and surplus electronic parts houses. These little breakers mount through a round hole and can usually be found in 10, 15, 20. 25 and 30 Amp. Breakers would save you the trouble of carrying spare fuzes. If you are a cheapskate scrounger, these breakers can often be found in old power strips. Don't let the magic smoke out of electronic devices or they won't work. Paul Donohue Formerly of the First Signal Brigade 1965 Land Rover Dormobile ------------------------------[ <- Message 24 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980131 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 1998 14:26:03 -0500 From: "Jeffrey A. Berg" <jberg@hearstnewmedia.com> Subject: re: Electrical Question Paul Donohue suggests using Circuit Breakers to protect electronic devices such as stereo's and CBs. My suggestion is...maybe. I've thought about replacing my aux. fuse blocks in FINSUP with breakers. However, if I were to do so (assuming you're not using some type of breaker intended for sensitive electronics--which will probably pop from the heat in the engine compartment alone!), I'd make sure that I still had an appropriate fuse for each device located as near to the device as possible. In this case it is my belief that the breaker would absorb any "incoming" surges--which along with mud/rain/vibration are probably responsible for most of the fuses blown in my engine compartment. However, my experience is that breakers generally have a bit more "slop" than fuses and will blow at approximately the same point as a "slow blow" fuse--or even a little later. If a short circuit is produced inside your electronic device, it might do itself quite a bit of damage before it manages to trip the circuit breaker. (Hell, in some cases it can catch on fire without blowing the fuse!) So leave a proper fuse in place near the device to reduce the possibility of damage from internal causes--and as an additional protection against a faulty breaker. Odds are you'll never replace this fuse, but it's better safe than sorry. Most marine electronics are wired in just this way--a power lead comes from the mains panel and feeds a single device or a cluster of instruments, but each device is protected by it's own fuse or built-in, "appropriate type" breaker. Do I hear a second? RoverOn! jab == Jeffrey A. Berg Macintosh Systems Consultant Phone (212) 649-2322 FAX (212) 957-8524 mailto:jberg@hearstnewmedia.com To report HNMC Macintosh problems use mailto:support@hearstnewmedia.com Remember, the subject line must include NMC MAC "Brief Description" ------------------------------[ <- Message 25 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980131 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 1998 14:34:01 -0500 From: "Jeffrey A. Berg" <jeff@purpleshark.com> Subject: Apologies to Paul Donohue (was re: Electrical Question) Upon careful rereading of Paul's message, I note that he initially suggested using breakers "in addition" to fuses--which is what I propose in my response to his suggestion to "use fuses". Obviously, he had the right idea to begin with even though I implied otherwise. Mea culpa, mea culpa, mea maxima culpa. Even while multi-tasking I will read all EMAIL carefully before responding... j "only 98 more times and I can go home" ab == Jeffrey A. Berg Purple Shark Media Rowayton, CT jeff@purpleshark.com ================== My garden is full of papayas and mangos. My dance card is filled with merengues and tangos. Taste for the good life, I can see it no other way. --Jimmy Buffett, Lone Palm (live version) ------------------------------[ <- Message 26 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980131 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 1998 14:59:26 -0500 From: Garret Scott <scottgs@usit.net> Subject: Re: Ammeter range conversion / wire gauges for 12-volt service / little LR contect Alan_Richer@motorcity2.lotus.com wrote: > -And for those objecting to pushing 60 amps through a 12 AWG wire - realize > -that 60 amps at 13.8 volts is only 828 watts - a 20-amp residential service > -at 115 volts is pushing 2.3KW through essentially the same wire. If you > -look at a GM harness you'll realize that the 12 AWG wire is not far off > -(and might be a bit heavier) than what they designed in as a feed wire for > -these alternators. The problem here is not how much power is conducted through the ammeter, but rather how much power is LOST in it. Sure, in a house, with a 115v power system, you can pass 2.3 kilowatts through a 12 gauge wire. But what does that have to do with the power loss in a 12 volt DC ammeter in a Land Rover? The power lost in the ammeter will nave nothing to do with system voltage. In this case, voltage it is no longer a factor in the equation. Think about it, how woul the ammeter ever know what the voltage in the system is? Is the Ammeter grounded? The problem in this discussison is that some of us are are missing something in basic electrical theory. Basically, that Power and Current are NOT the same thing. You are comparing apples and oranges. Basically the same problem Nicola Tesla solved years ago. The theory which allows high voltage AC power distribution systems to work, and which in the early years also quickly killed off Edison's 30 volt DC power systems. DC systems which could barely light a single light bulb because the wire was TOO SMALL. I I think most people don't realize that Tesla's work is responsible for our modern power systems ( I guess most don't really care). Edison did invent the light bulb, but also had major trouble understanding electrical theory for some years... For those that don't want to read any further: the bottom line is that the current handling capacity of a wire has nothing to do with the voltage. And a 12 gauge wire can only reliably handle 20 amps or so, whether at 12 volts, 24 volts or 120 volts. And the ammeter in a stock Series IIA Land Rover is only designed to handle about 30 amps maximum. Let's do the Math: Ohm's Law: Voltage = Current x Resistance Watt's Law: Power = Voltage x Current Solve for Power and we get: Power = Current squared x Resistance (You will notice that voltage cancels out and is not a factor in the equation) The resistance, or conductance of an electrical conductor only affects the current it can carry, not the voltage. You will note that in the USA, according to the National Electrical Code (NEC) it is illegal to install a utility power system with a 12 gauge wire to carry more than 20 amperes, regardless of voltage. The fact that the system could provide 2300 watts of power is irrelavent. You will also note that a residential electrical service-drop of #2 wire can handle 200 amps. But if it is installed underground, the same 200 amp circuit must use 4-0 wire. Much, much heavier gauge wire. Why? Because underground lines are not air-cooled like overhead ones. Just the same, the ammeter in a Land Rover dashboard is not likely to receive very good air-cooling. ->Do the math - the wire cross-section and such is well within acceptable ->parameters. it would be better if it was stranded, but that would make a ->right proper mess of the magnetic field, wouldn't it? I don't know of any parameters except an electrical heater perhaps, that say it is acceptable to send 60 amps through a 12 gauge wire. While we are on the subject, (More LR content here) this theory is also the reason that 24 volt electrical systems are preffered where heavy current is required in an automobile, such as a military Land Rover. By doubling the system voltage, you automatically double the power handling capacity without having to change the SIZE of the conductors. Neat huh? I do apologize to those readers that have little or no interest in electrical theory who have read this far. But on the other hand I just can't help but want all of us to have safe and reliable Land Rovers. Garret Scott Knoxville, TN (You will notice that voltage cancels out and is not a factor in the equation) ------------------------------[ <- Message 27 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980131 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 1998 16:03:59 -0500 (EST) From: PETER KASKAN <PKASKAN@clarku.edu> Subject: Transmission Problems 1. I was parking my '65IIA the other night - and the shift got stuck in the reverse position. I worked it out - but when I moved it across the neutral positions there was much more resistance than before. Also the springy-thing that keeps it from moving into the reverse position w/o force was broken or had come loose. My question was do they commonly break, or do they just come loose? If it's broken, can I repair it or do I have to buy a new one? ( Can I buy this part w/ a built in electrical switch for a reverse light? ) 1a. More recently, it got stuck in (I think) first, and felt just the same as the previous time. I worked it out again. It also seems that there is some remnant of the reverse gate, though the spring action is much weaker. 2. When I come down hills in third, letting the engine slow the car,it isn't long before it pops into neutral, helped by the bumpy roads. Is this an adjustment or is there a worn part in there? Thanks & Happy Rovering - Peter Kaskan 1965 Ex-MoD Series IIA (In ref. to prev. messages - Recently Imported from Englan to the US - running petrol in a non-converted head w/lead substitute) ------------------------------[ <- Message 28 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980131 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 1998 16:45:57 -0500 From: "A. P. \"Sandy\" Grice" <rover@pinn.net> Subject: 50th Anniversary Well, LRNA announced its "official" 50th celebration plans: a one day event at "the house" - Rover's Lanham HQ. This is scheduled for June 27th, (which conflicts with the DownEast event). Curiously, the same day that I received the press release from LRNA, I also got one from the Bowie British Car Day folks. Typically held the thrid weekend in June - around the 20th - it has been rescheduled for the 28th. Coincidence? I think not. Anyway, plans for a 'real' celebration are moving along. If you haven't already marked your calendar, reserve the weekend of July 31, August 1 & 2 for the largest gathering of Land Rovers ever in North America - by a factor of three or four. Bay State, Ottawa Valley and ROAV have joined forces to create the Association of North American Rover Clubs (ANARC) - the official sponsor of the event. News, schedules and other pertinent information will be posted on the web page as soon as we have them. The URL is: www.rover-clubs.org Cheers ------------------------------[ <- Message 29 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980131 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 1998 18:38:59 -0400 From: john cranfield <john.cranfield@ns.sympatico.ca> Subject: Re: Transmission Problems The ball on your shift lever is worn and popping out of position in the selector also the springs on the reverse lockout are weak(likely one is broken) and there is wear in the gearbox itself that allows it to come out of third. John and Muddy ------------------------------[ <- Message 30 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980131 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Alan_Richer@motorcity2.lotus.com Date: Fri, 30 Jan 1998 14:56:45 -0500 Subject: Re: Ammeter range conversion / wire gauges for 12-volt service / Garrett, believe what you wish - 25 years in the computer industry, most of it as a silicon and mechanical engineer, tell me otherwise. Theory is great - but you're not taking into account duty cycle or any of the real-world factors involved in this application. NEC is lovely for houses or commercial applications - but their specifications are rated to (if I remember my courses on this from centuries ago) 10-15% of absolute working (Notice working, not maximum!) currents for conductors at continuous duty. When I referred to working the math, I did not refer to the commercial electrical code. I was referring to the current-carrying capacity of conductors not arbitrary atandards. Voltage and total wattage DO matter - as do frequecy and a whole raft of other things. This is becoming tiresome - I don't feel like dragging out my texts and debating at this level. Do as you wish - I stand by my words and the designs I've put in production. ajr/Mr. Churchill left.... ------------------------------[ <- Message 31 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980131 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 1998 15:38:02 PST Subject: 50th Anniversary From: rover-on@juno.com (Land Rover) At 04:45 PM 1/30/98 -0500, A. P. \"Sandy\" Grice wrote: >Bay State, Ottawa Valley and ROAV have joined >forces to create the Association of North American Rover Clubs (ANARC) Shouldn't that be "Association of North American Land-Rover Clubs", or ANAL-RC ? -*- _____________________________________________________________________ You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail. Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com Or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866] ---------- > From: A. P. "Sandy" Grice <rover@pinn.net> > To: lro@playground.sun.com > Subject: 50th Anniversary > Date: Friday, January 30, 1998 2:45 PM > Well, LRNA announced its "official" 50th celebration plans: a one day event > at "the house" - Rover's Lanham HQ. This is scheduled for June 27th, > (which conflicts with the DownEast event). Curiously, the same day that I > received the press release from LRNA, I also got one from the Bowie British > Car Day folks. Typically held the thrid weekend in June - around the 20th > - it has been rescheduled for the 28th. Coincidence? I think not. > Anyway, plans for a 'real' celebration are moving along. If you haven't > already marked your calendar, reserve the weekend of July 31, August 1 & > Date: Friday, January 30, 1998 2:45 PM 2 > for the largest gathering of Land Rovers ever in North America - by a > factor of three or four. Bay State, Ottawa Valley and ROAV have joined > forces to create the Association of North American Rover Clubs (ANARC) - > the official sponsor of the event. News, schedules and other pertinent > information will be posted on the web page as soon as we have them. The > URL is: www.rover-clubs.org > Cheers ------------------------------[ <- Message 33 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980131 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: WJMcD@aol.com Date: Fri, 30 Jan 1998 20:12:11 EST Subject: Commercial (LRO) Content! I''ve have a 1969 109 for sale. She can be seen at http://member.aol.com/Beauty.html. This is a great opportunity to get a beautiful 109 (best year in my humble opinion) for a great price. Sorry for the commercial content. I've listed her everywhere else with no serious buyers. You could also call me. I'm in Washington DC 301.277.4321 Bill McDonald '87 Range Rover- in progress '69 109" '66 MGB ------------------------------[ <- Message 34 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980131 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 1998 17:31:56 -0800 From: Michael Carradine <mc@landrover.net> Subject: Re: Commercial (LRO) Content! At 08:12 PM 1/30/98 EST, WJMcD@aol.com wrote: :I''ve have a 1969 109 for sale. She can be seen at :http://member.aol.com/Beauty.html. This is a great opportunity to get a :beautiful 109 (best year in my humble opinion) for a great price. I believe the correct URL is: http://members.aol.com/WJMcD/Beauty.html ^^^^^^ -Michael ------------------------------[ <- Message 36 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980131 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Kevin Sellitti <Kevinsel@gte.net> Subject: RE: 101 production (was US 25 year import rule) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 1998 20:23:11 -0500 Check out this two site. It looks like this guy can bring any military = hardware into the U.S. He has old Soviet Fighters, Bombers, Tanks and = Jeeps for sale, Some Swedish Volvos too. Other tanks and armor lots of = trucks. He could probably get a 101 in for you. http://www.militaryimport.com/ I just checked their site. They started upgrading on 1/29 so right now = you can see any of the stuff they have. Disclaimer: I have no idea who they are I just found them in a search = engine. ---------- From: David Cockey[SMTP:dcockey@tir.com] Sent: Thursday, January 29, 1998 8:05 PM Subject: Re: 101 production (was US 25 year import rule) car4doc wrote: > Well when I talked to customs in Washington they told me that nothing > which was EX-MOD could be imported no matter what year it was. They > were very very clear about it as well. I looked at the ATF web site yesterday, and found a copy of the law governing import and export of military items (the title of the law says export only, but it covers import also, and ATF covers import only). It listed all kinds of restricted items, some obvious like nuclear weapons and destroyers, and others not so obvious. One class of items was military vehicles, and a quick look suggested a vehicle without gun mounts, etc., non-amphibious and unarmoured was not included in the restricted list. However, permission can be granted by ATF for many classes of restricted items, and an importer's license cost around $250/yr. Certain types of firearms and other weapons, goods furnished to foreign governments under military aid programs, and some other classes have blanket prohibitions. Also military goods from certain countries have blanket prohibitions, but the UK was not one of the countries. There were also several open letters to importers posted about changes to various regulations and how ATF was working to assist importers. One even announced that ATF now had an office dedicated to assisting importers of military goods. My experience with calling US Customs and asking about regulations is that the person answering the phone will probably give you whatever answer comes to mind, but most likely be conservative and say no if in any doubt. You need to find someone who actually has the regulations in front of them, and then you may have to ask questions about specific sections to get them to read the regulations. Regards, David Cockey ------------------------------[ <- Message 37 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980131 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: SPYDERS@aol.com Date: Fri, 30 Jan 1998 19:37:50 EST Subject: Re: 50th Anniversary In a message dated 1/30/98 7:01:33 PM, you wrote: >Sandy, >Sorry to disapoint you but I am planning that the National Rally will be >the LARGEST ROVER EVENT OF 1998. Also planned for the weekend of June 25- >27th. >Hope that you won't be upset that we are taking all of the rovers from your >little show :^).....HA HA! Going by the previous three 50th postings I've read... Your party dates don't seem to conflict with the ANARCist's dates at all, just LRNA's one day event on 6/27. The BIG event as planned by the clubs is 7/31-8/2 as was posted originally by owner-lro@playground.sun.com in his 50th Anniversary posting. pat. ------------------------------[ <- Message 39 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980131 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Allan Smith <smitha@candw.lc> Subject: Re: Bonnet mounted spare, now won't open... Date: Fri, 30 Jan 1998 22:23:00 -0300 Hi all - I'm just back from a month off the list while in Zim and SA, so no doubt missed some info on this. I have a '95 90 ROW spec Tdi in which the spring is quite capable of opening with a spare on the bonnet. LR supplied replacement bonnet release cables for this model because they were prone to failure. I fitted the replacement but I have to admit that there really wasn't any reason to do so. What I do recommend is pulling the cable out of it's sleeve and greasing it. Allan. ------------------------------[ <- Message 40 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980131 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 1998 19:37:51 -0800 From: "Andrew I. Dane" <aidane@mindspring.com> Subject: For Sale: 1993 Land Rover Defender 110 I am selling my 1993 Land Rover Defender 110 (#225/500). The vehicle has 61,000 miles and is in excellent condition (garaged). Asking price is $44,000. The vehicle is located in Chicago. If you (or any of your club members) is interested in discussing details, please contact me via reply e-mail (aidane@mindspring.com), telephone (773) 271-0808, or fax (773) 271-8524. Regards, Andy Dane ------------------------------[ <- Message 41 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980131 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 1998 22:37:51 -0600 From: car4doc <car4doc@concentric.net> Subject: Wanted dormobile front seats Hi All, Well I need the front seats for a Dormobile If anyone has some to sell. I have two rear seats with no middle seat. I am guessing this makes two beds one on each side when folded down. If any one can help me please email me off the list. Thanks again. Regards, Rob Davis_chicago ------------------------------[ <- Message 42 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980131 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: rovah@agate.net Date: Fri, 30 Jan 1998 23:47:53 -0500 (EST) Subject: FYI: Accomodation list for Winter Romp... Bruce Fowler asked me to pass along this list of area accomodations for those coming to the Winter Romp "from away." :-) Cheers! John Available Lodging for the 1998 Winter Romp > American Lodge 207-453-7111 > 31 Main Street > Fairfield, Me 04937 Rooms $37.45 Dub.Oup & up. > Holiday Inn 207-873-0111 > 375 Main Street > Waterville, ME 04901 Weekend Rates $49.00 Dub.Oup. & up. > Yankee Clipper Motel 207-338-2220 [ truncated by list-digester (was 35 lines)] > > Benton, ME 04901-4028 > ( 207)453-5074 John Cassidy Bangor, Maine USA The Downeast Land Rover Club, <http://www.agate.net/~rovah/> X0 of the V(irtual)MFA 323rd Cougars/Flying GSC's F/A-18 Hornet game <http://www.tstonramp.com/~kahuna/index.html> 2 Wheels: Ducati M900, Velocette Thruxton, Moto Morini 350S 4 Wheels: 1998 SE Discovery, 1987 Range Rover-"Smedley," 1966 Series IIA 88", 1972 Series III 88"-"SWAMBO" 1963 Unimog 404.1-S "The Caterpiller" ------------------------------[ <- Message 43 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980131 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 1998 00:55:51 -0800 From: "Con P. Seitl" <seitl@ns.sympatico.ca> Subject: Re: What's going on in the US? Poor Billy! Everyone's after his tail! So what if he's had a fling or two on the side, it's nobody's business. Men always get the short end of the stick when it comes to morals anyways, but if you stop to think, for every side trip there's always a woman there too! Recent poll taken on Wednesday , 2000 women were asked if they would sleep with Bill Clinton, and a whopping 79% said "never again!" ;-) Cheers Con Seitl 1973 III 88 "Pig" ------------------------------[ <- Message 44 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980131 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 1998 22:39:16 -0800 From: john hess <jfhess@dcn.davis.ca.us> Subject: dormie photos Hello, I recently had the pleasure of meeting Simon DeBues of the Dormobile Owners Club. When we met, he brought some photos from england of Land Rover Dormobiles (and one chevy corvair). I am having a few reproduced and am willing to supply copies to those want them. the photos will be of Land Rover Dormobiles interior/exterior. They are very old publicity shots from either Martin Walter or Land Rover (some of the photos are in a Martin Walter sales brochure I have). One shot is of a chevy corvair dormobile. I am spending $2.50 to have each negative made and $0.45 for each photo. I chose 8 to be redone. Exterior pose, a couple interior shots (one with Dormobile propane refrig and a couple of Barbara Toy picking up her Dormie from Martin Walter. (I assume most folks aren't interested in Ms. Toy so I'll leave those shots out.) Photos should be reprinted same size which is about 8x10. If you want a set, how about mailing me $5? Let me know if you want a set and I'll send you my address and confirm. cheers, John F Hess jfhess@wheel.dcn.davis.ca.us Land Rover Dormobile web pages: http://wheel.dcn.davis.ca.us/~jfhess/homepage.html 1968 Land Rover Dormobile "Elvis" 1960 swb pu "Stubby" (actually Katherine's), 1960 swb roadster "Slug" (Alex's) Slug needs everything, donations accepted ------------------------------[ <- Message 45 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980131 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
END OF * LIST DIGEST Input: messages 44 lines 2007 [forwarded 155 whitespace 0] Output: lines 1524 [content 1322 forwarded 107 (cut 48) whitespace 0][ First Message | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980131 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Digest Messages Copyright 1990-1999 by the original poster or/and Empire Rover Owners Society, All rights reserved. Photos & text Copyright 1990-1999 Bill Caloccia, All rights reserved. Empire/LRO List of charges for Empire/LRO Policies
against the distribution of unsolicited commercial e-mail (aka SPAM).
|
![]() |
|||
<--Back |
HOME |
TOP |
Forward --> |
|