[ First Message Last | Table of Contents | <- Digest -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 1998 15:13:31 +0200 From: wrm@ccii.co.za (Wouter de Waal) Subject: Re: Anyone try/have Metrinch tools? Hi John & all >about ready to change the channel when I see it is actually about tools so >I watch it. This tool is called the metrinch and it has both sockets and >spanner wrenches that have lobes (cam action) that hit the sides of hex >head instead of the corners. The claim is made that this enables a wrench >to grip both metric and english and rounded hex heads. I bought a little socket set from Gedore (local manufacturer, good price/performance ratio). They licenced the metrinch pattern. They work well, not excellently but well. There's more play in the socket (i.e. from loosening to fastening could be 15 degrees or so) which stands to reason, and that's a bit of a pain when ratcheting ('cause you effectively lose that bit of ratchet, except if you hold the socket still with your other hand, not always possible) but it works for me. Fits BSF and 2BA too :-) W ------------------------------[ <- Message 2 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980123 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 1998 09:15:44 -0600 From: nlamon1@tiger.lsuiss.ocs.lsu.edu Subject: WANTED: SII-A BULKHEAD straight, rebuildable I am seeking a SII-A Bulkhead to put in orignal condition then swap for the one I have. The Upper Section must be free of bondo and internal rusting, but the Lower Section can have the "usual" rust problems, just so long as it is factory straight. If you have one, please contact me at <nlamon1@tiger.lsu.edu>. Thanks, NL3 -- ------------------------------[ <- Message 3 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980123 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 1998 17:31:14 +0200 (EET) From: "R. Wade Hughes" <hughes@trshp.trs.ntc.nokia.com> Subject: Re: LWB Hoop Arrangement Could somebody tell me how the LWB hoods fasten to the windshield or bulkhead? I ask this because I purchased via the phone the 3 hoops and crossmembers for about US$20 from a guy here in Finland, who placed an ad in the bi-weekly trader paper here. Thus I presume I have everything I need for a 3/4 hood, but what above my head? I don't have a truck cab. What do you call the piece(s) I need above doors & windscreen to fasten a full hood? Can one roll back the part above the front seats with a full hood? What are my options? Excuse my naivete, as I've never seen up close a hood on a LR in my life! R. Wade Hughes Integration Engineer, Network Management Systems NTC, Nokia Group Valimotie 1, 2nd Floor 82 Pontiac GP 267 V8 T-Roof (in Canada) 00045 Helsinki, Finland 70 Land Rover SIIA Petrol Hardtop "Zenith" Tel. (358-9)-511-6332 73 Citroen 2CV (6-engine) Red "Zéphyr" Fax: (358-9)-511-63310 Net: hughes@trshp.ntc.nokia.com (Unix) or: wade.hughes@ntc.nokia.com (MS Mail) ------------------------------[ <- Message 4 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980123 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Huub Pennings" <HPS@fs1-kfih.azr.nl> Date: Thu, 22 Jan 1998 17:13:48 +0100 Subject: Re: WANTED: SII-A BULKHEAD straight, rebuildable Hello NL3 WHERE ARE YOU Regards, Huub Pennings e-mail adress Pennings@kfih.azr.nl ------------------------------[ <- Message 5 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980123 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Alain-Jean PARES" <InfoDyne@wanadoo.fr> Subject: Re: LWB Hoop Arrangement Date: Thu, 22 Jan 1998 17:20:34 +0100 >R. Wade Hughes >Integration Engineer, Network Management Systems >NTC, Nokia Group >Valimotie 1, 2nd Floor 82 Pontiac GP 267 V8 T-Roof (in Canada) >00045 Helsinki, Finland 70 Land Rover SIIA Petrol Hardtop "Zenith" >Tel. (358-9)-511-6332 73 Citroen 2CV (6-engine) Red "Zéphyr" Is your 2CV with a 6 cyl engine ? If yes it should be faster than the one I own... and sure faster than my 88D :-) Alain-Jean PARES 88 D Series III Bourron-Marlotte, FRANCE ------------------------------[ <- Message 6 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980123 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Faure, Marin" <Marin.Faure@PSS.Boeing.com> Subject: re: Towing with an 88" Date: Thu, 22 Jan 1998 09:05:23 -0800 Date: Wed, 21 Jan 1998 10:24:51 -0600 From: "\"Mr. Mike\" Passaretti" <passaretti@sol.med.ge.com> Subject: Towing with an 88" OK, so a serious question. A friend of mine tells me that if I want to tow my TR-4 (trailered) behind anything I should look for a longer wheelbase than his D90 has because (in his words) his trailer often ends up "wagging the dog" and he thinks it's a function of the wheelbase of the tow vehicle and the distance between the hitch attachment and the trailer wheels. Any comments from the veterans out there with SWB series tow vehicles? Back in the early 1980s I used to tow a 17' wooden, outboard runabout with my Series III-88. I would guess that the boat and trailer weighed about 2,000 pounds. I towed it several hundred miles into British Columbia on a couple of occasions, and to and from Puget Sound launching ramps on numerous occasions. The greatest problem I found was in braking when going down hills. The Land Rover's drum brakes just weren't up to the job and faded rapidly when I brought the vehicle to a stop at the bottom of a hill. I don't recall any handling problems at all. However, my speeds were pretty low. I doubt I ever exceeded 45 mph. The overdrive had been removed from the vehicle during this period for repair, and I don't believe in working an engine hard, so I never exceeded 3,000 rpm. At these low highway speeds, handling with a trailer was not a problem. If you force the vehicle to cruise at speeds of 55-60 mph, I wouldn't be surprised if you begin to experience instability with a trailer, but it will depend on the balance of the trailer, tongue weight, and so forth. But in general, a short wheelbase vehicle is not as stable as a long wheelbase vehicle when it comes to towing. I currently tow our heavy 17' fishing boat (total weight about 3,000 lbs) with either a Ford F-250 Supercab pickup or our 1991 Range Rover. The Range Rover does an excellent job despite its wheelbase being considerably shorter than the pickup's. The tracking is rock solid, even downhill or when decelerating or braking. If you have a properly balanced trailer setup, an 88 or 90 Land Rover should do okay IF you keep the speeds down, especially going downhill. The D90 has more powerful brakes than a Series Land Rover, but things could easily get out of hand if you let the speed build up too high. __________________ C. Marin Faure faurecm@halcyon.com marin.faure@boeing.com (original owner) 1973 Land Rover Series III-88 1991 Range Rover Vogue SE ------------------------------[ <- Message 7 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980123 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: reynoldsg@tfn.com Date: Thu, 22 Jan 1998 11:57:33 -0500 Subject: Re: No Help for Chinese LR Owner rwilson@usaor.net wrote: > reynoldsg@tfn.com wrote: >>Posts like this are completely inappropriate. > Are you the supreme authority on what is appropriate?? > I thought not. Does "IMO" need to be appended to everything I write? I don't think it should be required, as it should be understood. As far as I'm concerned the response was completely inappropriate IMO. >> Would you say what you wrote to the Chinese LR Owner in person? > I probably would, but I'm a bit of a smart ass anyway. Obviously. It must win you lots of friends... >> 1995 Beluga Black Discovery >> Rovers North Roof Rack >> 4 Hella Rallye 4000's >> 1 Hella Work Light > Perhaps you should spend more time wiring up some more lights to > your 1995 Beluga Black Discovery with the Rovers North Roof Rack and > less time worring about what other people think or say. Perhaps some people on the list should spend more time thinking about what they say before they say it... Obviously you're worrying about what I say because I don't agree with you - it works both ways. > Have a nice day :) I shall. It's obvious to me that there is a certain faction on this list that doesn't give a damn who they offend and feel that since they've been around the list for a while they don't need to be considerate to others. Well that's fine, but you're bound to offend, piss off and perhaps most importantly ruin the Land Rover experience for some people and quite frankly that sucks. I've had enough of this crap and will be unsubscribing from the LRO list. I've been reading this list out of interest and it's no longer interesting to me. The RRO list seems to have much less of this drivel. As to the follow up posts that say good riddance, you're just serving to prove my point. Jeff Reynolds 1995 Beluga Black Discovery Rovers North Roof Rack 4 Hella Rallye 4000's 1 Hella Work Lamp ------------------------------[ <- Message 8 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980123 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "K. John Wood" <jwrover@colo-net.com> Subject: Re: WANTED: SII-A Bulkhead: straight, rebuildable Date: Wed, 14 Jan 1998 13:27:18 -0700 If you are anywhere near colorado,usa on March 14 1998 head to Boulder, CO There is going to be a Land Rovere garage sale. Plenty of Bulkheads!!! Yours' John Wood ---------- > From: nlamon1@tiger.lsuiss.ocs.lsu.edu > To: lro@playground.sun.com > Subject: WANTED: SII-A Bulkhead: straight, rebuildable > Date: Wednesday, January 21, 1998 5:02 AM > I am looking for a SII-A Bulkhead to put into "as new" condition then, [ truncated by list-digester (was 12 lines)] > down the road, swap for the one I have. > Do you have a SII-A Bulkhead? The Upper Section must be free of bondo and > internal rusting, but the Lower Section can have the "usual" rust > problems, just so long as it is factory straight. I'm located in south > Louisiana (U.S.A.), so the closer you are to me the better, as shipping > costs add up fast. > If you have one, or know of one's location, please contact me via e-mail > <nlamon1@tiger.lsu.edu> . > Thanks [ truncated by list-digester (was 11 lines)] > Neil > -- ------------------------------[ <- Message 9 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980123 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "FHYap" <FHYap@ix.netcom.com> Subject: Re: No Help for Chinese LR Owner (NO LR CONTENT) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 1998 09:40:32 -0800 > God, you sniveling winer, just grow a thicker skin, and a sense of > humor while your at it. I've got my fingers connected to my brain, and one > of them is waiving at you right now. The original post was FUNNY, quit > being such a spineless, politically correct, cowardly wimp. Just like the previous f*gg*t joke, what is FUNNY to you may not be so to others. Frank ------------------------------[ <- Message 10 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980123 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 1998 19:44:49 +0200 (EET) From: "R. Wade Hughes" <hughes@trshp.trs.ntc.nokia.com> Subject: Re: LWB Hoop Arrangement In my message about hoods, the bulkhead I referred to was the one behind the seats...Isn't the front one the "breakfast"? Getting hungry, no chinese breakfasts please.. (I see the list is getting nasty again) R. Wade Hughes Integration Engineer, Network Management Systems NTC, Nokia Group Valimotie 1, 2nd Floor 82 Pontiac GP 267 V8 T-Roof (in Canada) 00045 Helsinki, Finland 70 Land Rover SIIA Petrol Hardtop "Zenith" Tel. (358-9)-511-6332 73 Citroen 2CV (6-engine) Red "Zéphyr" Fax: (358-9)-511-63310 Net: hughes@trshp.ntc.nokia.com (Unix) or: wade.hughes@ntc.nokia.com (MS Mail) ------------------------------[ <- Message 11 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980123 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Bob Watson <bobw@microsoft.com> Subject: Re: Ramsey Winches Date: Thu, 22 Jan 1998 09:47:20 -0800 I had a Ramsey PRO 8000 on my Jeep (for $350, I couldn't say no) and currently have a Warn XD 9000 on the Disco. I'd say, in a nutshell, you get what you pay for. If you plan on using the winch for the occasional (I mean once or twice a year) pull, then the Ramsey is fine. If you are going to give it a regular (i.e. more than monthly) workout, the Ramsey will start having problems much sooner than the Warn. The Warn is much more durably constructed and has better remote control accessories (Handle, connector, etc.) The Ramsey remote is hard to use with gloves and the plug was always intermittent on mine. The Ramsey has a plastic gear box and "shifter" while the Warn is all metal. It's not that Ramsey doesn't make other quality winches, it's just that their "low end" is lower than Warn's and is priced accordingly. One thing to note if you do buy a Ramsey, is that you should spend the extra money and get new cables. My installation kit came with only 1 battery cable and the ground was to be through the frame (not a good idea). You should install the winch with at least #2 AWG cables (bigger is better, of course) for pos and neg terminals and connect both terminals on the winch directly to the battery. Of course after you've done all this, you might as well have bought the Warn winch. Happy Trails! -- Bob W. '95 Disco ------------------------------[ <- Message 12 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980123 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Paul Quin <Paul_Quin@pml.com> Subject: RE: LWB Hoop Arrangement Date: Thu, 22 Jan 1998 09:57:19 -0800 Mr. Hughes writes: >In my message about hoods, the bulkhead I referred to was the one behind the seats...Isn't the front one the "breakfast"? < The breakfast is the bit that holds up the radiator & headlights (on older Series II's) The official Land Rover name for the dash is 'Dash Panel' but it is more commonly referred to as the 'Bulkhead' I think that the bulkhead behind the seats is commonly referred to as "The Bulkhead Behind the Seats" Anybody? Paul Quin 1961 Series II under construction - now with a new improved rust free Limestone bulkhead. Victoria, BC Canada >-----Original Message----- >From: R. Wade Hughes [SMTP:hughes@trshp.trs.ntc.nokia.com] >Sent: Thursday, January 22, 1998 9:45 AM >To: lro@playground.sun.com >Subject: Re: LWB Hoop Arrangement [ truncated by list-digester (was 14 lines)] >(I see the list is getting nasty again) >------------------------------------------------------------------------= >R. Wade Hughes >Integration Engineer, Network Management Systems >NTC, Nokia Group >Valimotie 1, 2nd Floor 82 Pontiac GP 267 V8 T-Roof (in = Canada) >00045 Helsinki, Finland 70 Land Rover SIIA Petrol Hardtop = "Zenith" >Tel. (358-9)-511-6332 73 Citroen 2CV (6-engine) Red = "Z=E9phyr" >Fax: (358-9)-511-63310 >Net: hughes@trshp.ntc.nokia.com (Unix) > or: wade.hughes@ntc.nokia.com (MS Mail) >------------------------------------------------------------------------= >Fax: (358-9)-511-63310 ------------------------------[ <- Message 13 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980123 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 1998 08:20:28 -1000 From: Faye and Peter Ogilvie <ogilvi@hgea.org> Subject: Re: No Help for Chinese LR Owner I am glad the list was split between the effete snobs in their beluga black, never been off road, enough lights for the super bowl, newbie rovers and the rest of us. This list is for those of us who need or want to give info on keeping their series rover's functioning and improving them and anecdotes about driving and living with the series rover. It seems that every time some one says something that does not fit into the tree hugging, animal rights, socialist, race quota view of the world, we have one of these individuals getting their jockey shorts in a wedgee and storming off. I don't agree with their warped view of the world but if they own a series rover, I'll still pull and help them if I see them stopped beside the road. I'll still be on this list fighting the fight of keeping my series rover on the road forever. As far as the Chinese rr owner was concerned. The lesson of the response was right on (buy one of these new rovers and you better not have to ask how much and where to get it serviced). The mock pigeon english was definitely racially insensitive and offensive. Give me insensitive and offensive any day to some uptight, upscale yuppie trying to be PC, however. Having said that, I think it would have been better just to shunt the guy from china over to the snob list or to send him where he really needed to go (lrna), without comment. Feel sorry for the guy with his super complex toy in the hinterlands of china, however he put himself there. It wasn't polite to kick him while he was down. The purpose of this list is to disseminate information. That also includes opinions as well as technical information. Personally I think it would be better to do it in a civil manner without going out of your way to offend, however. I won't unsubscribe, I'll laugh at the cat fry threads, and read the pigeon english diatribes, though not with whole hearted approval. We need to have the warts as well as the jewels of series ownership pointed out, just consider whether your comments will improve ours and/or a posters knowledge and enjoyment of their machine. Incidentally, you really want to be flamed, say something bad about a series III or d90 on the RN bulletin board. You will find some people of extremely strong conviction who have absolutely no sense of humor. Aloha Peter. >It's obvious to me that there is a certain faction on this list that >doesn't give a damn who they offend and feel that since they've been >around the list for a while they don't need to be considerate to >others. Well that's fine, but you're bound to offend, piss off and >perhaps most importantly ruin the Land Rover experience for some >people and quite frankly that sucks. I've had enough of this crap and >will be unsubscribing from the LRO list. I've been reading this list [ truncated by list-digester (was 21 lines)] >4 Hella Rallye 4000's >1 Hella Work Lamp ------------------------------[ <- Message 14 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980123 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 1998 08:30:17 -1000 From: Faye and Peter Ogilvie <ogilvi@hgea.org> Subject: RE: Landrover technical descriptions >Mr. Hughes writes: >I think that the bulkhead behind the seats is commonly referred to as >"The Bulkhead Behind the Seats" Thankyou Paul. Mr. Johnson and Mr. Webster would be proud of your contribution to the clarity of terms pertaining to the land rover. Now for the real reason for the post: How did the radiator shell/grill come to be known as the breakfast. Was it the time honored tradition of cooking your morning 'bangers' on the rover grill over an open fire????? Aloha Peter ------------------------------[ <- Message 15 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980123 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Paul Quin <Paul_Quin@pml.com> Subject: Dr. Johnson / Hawaii Five O Date: Thu, 22 Jan 1998 10:39:45 -0800 Peter from Hawaii writes: >Thankyou Paul. Mr. Johnson and Mr. Webster would be proud of your contribution to the clarity of terms pertaining to the land rover.< Hey, that's DOCTOR Johnson! Speaking of Hawaii, a moment of silence for the late Jack Lord. "Book 'em Danno!" Paul. >-----Original Message----- >From: Faye and Peter Ogilvie [SMTP:ogilvi@hgea.org] >Sent: Thursday, January 22, 1998 10:30 AM >To: lro@playground.sun.com >Subject: RE: Landrover technical descriptions [ truncated by list-digester (was 23 lines)] >cooking your morning 'bangers' on the rover grill over an open fire????? >Aloha Peter ------------------------------[ <- Message 16 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980123 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 98 14:07:00 EST From: Jesse Easudes <jessee@FRC2.FRC.RI.CMU.EDU> Subject: breakfast? "the radiator shell/grill came to be known as the breakfast" not sure how this came to be but following with the same logic, shouldn't the bulkhead be called the lunch, with the bulkhead behind the seat being called the dinner? Made some kind of sense to me. Jesse Easudes '60 88 with truck cab and 3/4 canvas rhd, lovely (4wheel lucas) '73 Triumph Daytona (two wheel lucas) Pittsburgh, PA ------------------------------[ <- Message 17 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980123 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Subject: Re:No Help for Chinese LR Owner Date: Thu, 22 Jan 1998 11:15:19 -0800 (PST) From: "Michael Fredette" <mfredett@ichips.intel.com> Jeff opines again, Perhaps some people on the list should spend more time thinking about what they say before they say it... Obviously you're worrying about what I say because I don't agree with you - it works both ways. ******* No, it's just that most of us on this list are not about to fall for the whole PC line of watching every damn thing we say for fear of, God Forbid, OFFENDING someone. Only one other person took your side, while I got 40+ posts to me saying "BRAVO, enough PC bullshit" ********** It's obvious to me that there is a certain faction on this list that doesn't give a damn who they offend and feel that since they've been around the list for a while they don't need to be considerate to others. ************ Exactly, we have the advanced trait of a sense of humor. And are able to appreciate a HARMLESS, repeat HARMLESS, joke poking fun at the lousy grammar of a Chinese guy. *********************** Well that's fine, but you're bound to offend, piss off and perhaps most importantly ruin the Land Rover experience for some people and quite frankly that sucks. I've had enough of this crap and will be unsubscribing from the LRO list. I've been reading this list out of interest and it's no longer interesting to me. The RRO list seems to have much less of this drivel. As to the follow up posts that say good riddance, you're just serving to prove my point. ******************* So be it, and good riddance. You notice that only the US has fallen for the ridiculous PC line forbiding any poking fun at any group for any reason. The UK folk, and the Aussies seem to get it, it's funny. *******************' Yes, the original post was funny but your response wasn't. I don't tend to be politically correct, but I do try to be considerate to other people. *************** How on earth you can make that asinine statement I'll never know. Your WHOLE MAIL is PC drivel. I'll say it again, GROW A THICKER SKIN and a SENSE OF HUMOR. People, and groups of people, are funny. There is nothing in the least harmfull at having a good laugh at people and all the various idiosyncracies we have. And if you want to make a nice joke about me or the rest of us offensive oafs on the list, be my guest, I've even got the sense of humor to be able to laugh at myself too, imagine that. **************** As to being "a spineless, cowardly wimp" I STRONGLY doubt you'd say that to me in person. **************** Sure I would, with a SMILE on my face too. Because you're funny. Sad but funny. Come over to Portland for the ALL BRITISH FIELD MEET in Sept over Labor Day. I'll even take you for a ride in the 101FC on the jungle course. In the mean time, go back to the RRO list, polish that passel of Hella's on your Disco, and comiserate with the rest of the cowardly, spineless, PC wimps over all us offensive assholes here on the Leaf Sprung list. **************** Warmest regards Yeah right. Jeff Reynolds ****************** No really, Warmest regards. If you ever do grow that sense of humor, come on back to the list. My well developed sense of humor also prevents me from getting offended and carrying a grudge in addition to being able to appreciate good harmless fun. Mike ------------------------------[ <- Message 18 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980123 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Subject: No Help for Chinese (last Time) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 1998 14:20:50 -0800 (PST) From: "Michael Fredette" <mfredett@ichips.intel.com> So does that make you right? Of course not. Did I imply that I'm right? Again, no. I have my opinion and happen to disagree with yours. So be it. ******* Well LA DE DA ********* If the Chinese guy read it, I have a hunch he would be hurt - thus no longer harmless. Don't you at least see my point???? Oh I forgot - it was funny so it's OK. ************* Well, I have several Chinese friends who would not be "hurt", would see the humor, know the spirit in which it was given, and laugh. ************* Well, it CAN be funny. I didn't find the post funny, though few people accuse me of not having a sense of humor. To me something is especially funny if it doesn't offend anyone - it really is possible. I saw humor in the poor grammar in the original post. However, I didn't have to resort to pointing it out to the whole world. Those of us with a real sense of humor got our laughs out of the original post and left it at that. In other words, I'm as !PC as the next guy, but I don't try to offend people in the process. *************** Uh, well no, it was the second post poking fun that we were all laughing at. If you were offended, so what. We are still going to enjoy ourselves. Yes, at the expense of the Chinese guy. Though as I said, most of the CHinese guys I know would lagh as well. ***************** Call it what you want, but very few people who know me would accuse me of being PC, though it wouldn't be the worst thing to be accused of... I'll say it again, GROW A THICKER SKIN and a SENSE OF HUMOR. You mean adapt to YOUR sense of humor - no thanks. * ***** No chowderhead, I don't give a rat's rear end what you think is funny. We all thought it ws funny. We don't ask you to "adapt to our sense of humor", since that would be against your sanctimonious worries of offending anyone. But BY GAWD don't you try to tell us to conform to your narrow definition if humor either. If you don't like us, shut up and go away. Gee wiz. ******************** Actually there is. Remember Chris Farley? He was constantly being laughed at by people because of his appearance. I doubt if that had nothing to do with his drug/alcohol problems and eventual death. ******************* Ok, now I'm on the ground howling. CHRIS FARLEY!!! Where/how the hell did he get dragged into this. But OK, since you bring him up, Chris Farley was an idiot. An idiot who couldn't handle success, who drank and drugged himself to death. Period. He was laughed at for his appearance, but HIS SENSE OF HUMOR, allowed him to turn that to his advantage, and make millions doing movies and standup around the country, ALL BASED ON MAKING FUN OF HIMSELF. He was able to laugh at himself. Get it. The fact that he's dead is stricktly due his inability to be an adult about dealing with those millions. But he's dead, so let's not shead crocodile tears over an idiot shall we. ********************** Perhaps I should flood the LRO list with questions about cupholders and CD players while I'm at it. ************************** Go ahead, I'm sure you'll make lots of friends that way. ********************** There appears to be lots of animosity toward coil sprung owners on the LRO list - I just don't understand why. **************** Because we're all insensitive, offensive assholes, remember........who don't give a damn how many Hella's we have. Or roof racks, CD changers, cruise controls, cup holders and check engine lights. It's all just poser stuff to us. ***************** You obviosly have a problem with the signature that I attach to my LR related email. Having that signature has actually resulted in a number of people asking me how I went about wiring up the lights. I've also had some questions on my level of satisfaction with the Rover North rack. I've made a few new friends along the way. That's why I include that info in my signature. Yeah, it's probably a little corney, but most people on the 2 lists include at least some information on their Rovers in their signatures. At least I don't have a 30 line signature complete with ASCII drawings, or include the entire previous message after my post as an attachment, or include binary attachments (other than those imposed by the crappy cc:Mail system I'm stuck with for now). My well developed sense of humor also prevents me from getting offended and carrying a grudge in addition to being able to appreciate good harmless fun. Your "well developed sense of humor..." is now a contributing factor to one former LRO reader being pissed and slightly less interested in eventually owning a Series Rover. Yup - that's hilarious... **************************** Aw poor baby. Good Lord, how old are you 6? Just go away and polish your Hella's, don't write back, we're all growing weary of debating you on points you insist on showing your silly PC narrow minded attitudes on. Come to Portland and I'll drive the 101 over your Disco and put you out of our misery. :^) ------------------------------[ <- Message 19 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980123 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 1998 21:20:26 From: James Wolf <J.Wolf@worldnet.att.net> Subject: Mr. AH SO, Chinese Landy man. > Ah, Mr. Chinese LR Owner, you fall for Imperialist rip off too many > time. Your car not real. It is impostor of highest order and > [ truncated by lro-lite (was 6 lines)] > lemon-law; but china have no law at all so you out of luck. ><additional drivel snipped> > Posts like this are completely inappropriate. Would you say what you > wrote to the Chinese LR Owner in person? I don't think so. Next time [ truncated by list-digester (was 19 lines)] > being such a spineless, politically correct, cowardly wimp. >Warmest regards HEAR HEAR! IF THEY CAN'T TAKE A JOKE THEN SCREW 'EM. Jim Wolf ------------------------------[ <- Message 20 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980123 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 1998 22:21:56 -0500 From: Garret Scott <scottgs@usit.net> Subject: Re: Towing with an 88" - My experience Ok, a serious answer: There IS truth to what your friend says. I once towed an Alfa Romeo GTV-6 about 250 miles on the interstate from the *local* dealer in Atlanta back home to Knoxville, Tennesse with my 88 air-portable. It was hair raising experience. Both for me, and the other drivers on the road. We did not use a tandem trialer, but one of those which you drive the rear wheels up on, leaving the vehicle facing backwards with the front wheels on the ground (for a rear wheel drive vehicle anyway). The combination was stable only at certian speeds. And stopping was VERY scary. If I hadn't been Young and Dumb, I wouldn't have done it. And I will NEVER do that again. Like the saying goes, you need the right tool for the job. A short, underpowered, underbraked 88" Land Rover is NOT the tool for the job. That is what they make Trucks for, like say a 110, or a pickup, or rolloff or a semi etc. You must be SAFE, and the simple decisions we make in cases like this can, if poorly made, turn into major long-lasting problems for our lives. Keep in mind that most rental companies will tell you anything, and rent you anything to make a buck. As the Drivers, we are the captian of the ship, and it is ultimatly our responsibility to be safe. On the otherhand, if your just going across town a short distance, or slowly off-road or something, and you are careful, you should be fine. I've towed more vehicles than I can count, more miles that I can possibly remember, with an 88 Land Rover off-road, at slower speeds. Just remember, Momentum = Mass times velocity Squared I know I sound like an Arrogant, know it all As***le, but I have done it, I've been there. Somehow I got lucky and sqeeked through. Now I love Land Rovers, and want to help other owners if I can. Good Luck, Garret Scott scottgs@usit.net ------------------------------[ <- Message 21 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980123 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 1998 22:33:18 -0500 From: Garret Scott <scottgs@usit.net> Subject: Re: Ramsey Winches John and Muddy, I have had a Ramsey DC200 for 15 years now on my '88. It's the best winch I have ever had. Industructible. Far tougher than my old Warn 8274. The DC200 is however an industrial, 10,500lb rated, Worm gear winch with a 470:1 gear ratio, and 11" wide drum. I've used it underwater, upside down, everyway I can think of. Back in the summer of '83, I once pulled 47 vehicles out of the Mud in a single weekend with it and my Land Rover. I have had to replace the cable 3 times, repainted it twice, and replaced the brake pads once. The REP 8000 on the otherhand, well I've honestly never used one, but I have heard from multiple sources that they are pure Junk. Ramsey parts are easy to get in the USA. And they will send you a service manual for free if you need it. I have had very good experience with the company and the dealers. Garret Scott scottgs@usit.net ------------------------------[ <- Message 22 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980123 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 1998 22:56:54 -0500 From: rover@pinn.net (Alexander P. Grice) Subject: Winches Chris Dillard wrote with questions about the Ramsey REP8000 winch. I'm not positive, but I don't think that the REP series fits 'generic' winch mounts. The SafariGard and I believe the ARB have 'industry standard' mounting holes/patterns that fit most all models of Superwinch, Warn, MileMarker and Ramsey *except* for the REP series. Cheers *---"Jeep may be famous, LAND-ROVER is Legendary"----* | A. P. (Sandy) Grice | | Rover Owners' Association of Virginia, Ltd. | | "The oldest Rover-marque club in the Americas" | | 1633 Melrose Parkway, Norfolk, VA 23508-1730 | | E-mail: rover@pinn.net Phone: 757-622-7054 (Day) | | 757-423-4898 (Evenings) FAX: 757-622-7056 | | | *---1972 Series III 88"-----1996 Discovery SE-7(m)---* ------------------------------[ <- Message 23 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980123 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 1998 22:36:56 -0600 From: car4doc <car4doc@concentric.net> Subject: 101 kits for sale?? Hi All, In the Jan. Rover Works MAG is an ad for a UK company offering 101's in crates which I am guessing were for Government issues. Is it at all possible to import these to the US even as privite Property toys?? I would love to have a 101 just to play with & in some civil defence areas DOT are not an issue. Seen any HIGH loaders with plates in storm cleanups? Like most people I want a 101 amblance or radio van to convert to a camper. Can any one import these trucks at all?? Regards, RobDavis_chicago ------------------------------[ <- Message 24 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980123 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Tom Dixon" <tomd@clear.net.nz> Subject: Ace ventura pet detective and rovers Date: Fri, 23 Jan 1998 21:33:33 +1300 Kai ora.... Watched a movie on the tele last night called "Ace ventura pet detective" if you have not seen it, it is well worth watching. Main vehicles are landrovers and what this guy does to it is bloody amazing. Talk about greenlane driving. this would bring tears to any tree huggers eyes. He does some amazing parking in it. totaling destroying it in the end. The high light for me was when the "Ace" gets this elephant to tip a toyota wagon on its side, justice for all I thought. If you have not seen the movie I recommend get it on video and enjoy Cheers.... Tom Dixon ZL2UPG 79 series 3 lbw (in many pieces) tomd@clear.net.nz ------------------------------[ <- Message 25 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980123 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Andy Phillips <AnPi@norsk-data.co.uk> Subject: RE: 101 kits for sale?? Date: Fri, 23 Jan 1998 09:31:25 -0000 Rob, I'm sorry I don't have an answer for you but being in the UK I am extremely interested in a 101 in crates. The last time I saw an add they sold out on the first day! Can you tell me where I can find out more info please? If the price is right I might buy one straight away. I have heard on this list that if you don't plan on taking the vehicle out on the public roads or property it won't be of any interest to the inspectors and DOT in general. Look in the archive for references to importing 110s from the UK or Europe. Cheers, Andy. > -----Original Message----- > From: car4doc [SMTP:car4doc@concentric.net] > Sent: Friday, January 23, 1998 4:37 AM > To: lro@playground.sun.com > Subject: 101 kits for sale?? [ truncated by list-digester (was 22 lines)] > Regards, > RobDavis_chicago ------------------------------[ <- Message 26 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980123 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 1998 10:55:24 +0000 From: M.J.Rooth@lboro.ac.uk (Mike Rooth) Subject: Re: Towing with an 88" - My experience >Like the saying goes, you need the right tool for the job. A short, >underpowered, underbraked 88" Land Rover is NOT the tool for the job. I hear what you say,Garret,but I dont entirely agree.Over here(UK) the 88" is the tool of preference for towing.I've only ever seen one 109" dragging a horsebox.And it didnt look too happy.I've seen a good many 110's pulling caravans,but then again,they arent what you'd call heavy. I've pulled horses with my diesel 11A 88",and while I cant say that, at the outset,at least,I enjoyed it,at least it didnt feel dangerous. The horsebox was,of course,braked.We use "overrun" brakes.That is to say,when the tug brakes,the towbar cup on the trailer is compressed rearwards on a spring and operates mechanical brakes on all four trailer wheels.I believe you people use a different system? I submit that towing horses is perhaps the acid test of both tug,and driver. (Comments,Nate?)The load isnt necessarily stable(pun NOT intended)depending on the individual animal/animals,you cant go fast,and you must never *never* make hurried alterations in speed or direction.You must anticipate way,way in advance.You *can* go balls to the wall if you want,but you'll probably never get those horses to load ever again,at best.At worst,you could arrive to find a ton of quivering horseflesh collapsed on the trailer floor.I've seen it happen. I reckon if you apply these principles to a "static" load you wont go far wrong.Nice steady speed,no sudden alterations in course or speed,a properly loaded and maintained trailer,and a little applied common sense and you'll be OK. Having said all this,I dont want to put myself forward as a towing "expert". I'm not.I know a lady who tows with her 88" S111 most weekends,and who really *is* an expert,except she'd never admit it.She had a thoroughbred mare that was a dreadful traveller from the word go,and yet through sheer good driving on her part,that horse *always* loaded,and arrived relatively unstressed. And to watch her reverse the rig into a space three inches wider than the trailer,at speed(empty,of course) is a delight.Mind you,give her a half mile wide space and shell be faffing about all day:-) Just my twopennorth,worth what you paid for it.... Mike Rooth ------------------------------[ <- Message 27 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980123 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 1998 12:54:45 +0300 (EET) From: Semih Bingol <semih@leo.ee.hun.edu.tr> Subject: Re:No Help for Chinese LR Owner Go easy fellas, another person on Jeff's side, just to let you know. Semih Bingol 74 SIII SWB ------------------------------[ <- Message 28 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980123 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 1998 11:08:46 +0000 From: M.J.Rooth@lboro.ac.uk (Mike Rooth) Subject: Re: Mr. AH SO, Chinese Landy man. being such a spineless, politically correct, cowardly wimp. >>Warmest regards >HEAR HEAR! IF THEY CAN'T TAKE A JOKE THEN SCREW 'EM. >Jim Wolf Gentlemen,please. It would seem to be much less stress to the psyche,on occasions such as this,to adopt the English attitude.If there is something you dislike... Ignore it.It will go away. Cheers Mike Rooth ------------------------------[ <- Message 29 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980123 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
END OF * LIST DIGEST Input: messages 28 lines 1491 [forwarded 180 whitespace 0] Output: lines 1143 [content 976 forwarded 114 (cut 66) whitespace 0][ First Message | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980123 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Back | Forward | |
---|---|---|
Photos & text Copyright 1990-2011 Bill Caloccia, All rights reserved. Digest Messages Copyright 1990-2011 by the original poster or/and Bill Caloccia, All rights reserved.
|