[ First Message Last | Table of Contents | <- Digest -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
msg | Sender | lines | Subject |
1 | Alan_Richer/CAM/Lotus@lo | 39 | Re: Dot4 |
2 | "Chris Dillard"[cdillard | 21 | Tires and Body Roll ! Any connection? |
3 | Adrian Redmond [channel6 | 45 | Re: Tires and Body Roll ! Any connection? |
4 | Nick Fankhauser [nickf@c | 35 | re: DOT4 (more on brake fluid) |
5 | David Kurzman [kurzman@i | 15 | Marvel Mystery Oil |
6 | SPYDERS [SPYDERS@aol.com | 26 | Re: Tires and Body Roll ! Any connection? |
7 | kiotee@mcn.net (Roy Cald | 18 | Re: ECR stealing *my* thunder! |
8 | Marc Rengers [mr@grant.m | 26 | [not specified] |
9 | john cranfield [john.cra | 9 | Re: Lockers |
10 | Russ Wilson [rwilson@usa | 19 | Re: Lockers |
11 | Uncle Roger [sinasohn@ri | 35 | Re: Land Rover Buyer's Kit |
12 | john cranfield [john.cra | 24 | Re: Lockers |
13 | "Christopher H. Dow" [do | 31 | Re: Land Rover Buyer's Kit |
14 | David L Glaser [dlglaser | 46 | Turbo Diesel Conversion |
15 | "William L. Leacock" [wl | 12 | axle |
16 | Tom Spoto [tspoto@az.com | 33 | Re: axle |
17 | Adrian Redmond [12140723 | 27 | Re: axle |
18 | Russ Wilson [rwilson@usa | 26 | Re: Lockers |
19 | Tom Spoto [tspoto@az.com | 10 | Re: Axle |
20 | "William S. Kowalski" [7 | 37 | IIA Transmission question |
21 | rover@pinn.net (Alexande | 44 | Girling and other fluids |
22 | rover@pinn.net (Alexande | 32 | Oil's well that end well |
23 | David Cockey [dcockey@ti | 23 | Re: Marvel Mystery Oil |
24 | David Cockey [dcockey@ti | 24 | Re: Land Rover Buyer's Kit |
25 | BarrieWyLR [BarrieWyLR@a | 11 | Re: Lockers |
26 | Granville Pool [gpool@pa | 16 | Re: Land Rover Buyer's Kit-Spam |
27 | Granville Pool [gpool@pa | 22 | Re: Land Rover Buyer's Kit |
28 | CIrvin1258 [CIrvin1258@a | 24 | Re: Turbo Diesel Conversion |
29 | "Richard Marsden"[rmarsd | 39 | Re: ECR stealing *my* thunder! |
30 | Duncan Phillips [dunk@iv | 21 | Re: What a wonderful tool!! |
31 | Paul Oxley [paul@adventu | 32 | Minamalism, was Re: ECR stealing *my* thunder! |
32 | Alan_Richer/CAM/Lotus@lo | 15 | Re: Turbo Diesel Conversion |
From: Alan_Richer/CAM/Lotus@lotus.com Date: Sun, 7 Dec 1997 09:35:43 -0500 Subject: Re: Dot4 Russ W. said: juice >of the gods.... the other stuff will rot your rubber inards on the whole >brake system.. And Tom disagreed: >Another chapter from the book of urban myths. But to each their own I >suppose. I must agree with Russ - and this is NOT friend of a friend, but personal experience. A few months back, I needed some DOT4 fuid and the parts house I got my Castrol from was closed for inventory. I went to the local Auto Palace and bought some Gunk DOT4 - a national name brand. Within 3 weeks I ended up rebuilding my rear brake cylinders, clutch slave and master - all of whom had had their seals dissolved by the foreign DOT4. The reason for this (and this is not a UL) is that DOT4 may be DOT spec and NOT BE GIRLING SPEC - in other words, it may have other ingredients in it that are not to the strict glycol formula that Girling recommends for the natural rubber in these and other brit vehicles. Not myth - fact. I learned this the hard way, after phone calls and some info from the manufacturers. Some DOT4s might work - but after a total system flush and repair I won't use anything but. aj"Be careful with substitutes!"r ------------------------------[ <- Message 2 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 971208 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Chris Dillard"<cdillard@Aholdusa.com> Date: Sun, 7 Dec 1997 11:08:04 -0500 Subject: Tires and Body Roll ! Any connection? Just last week I replaced all four tires on my 91 RR county and after I picked it up from the tire place it seemed to have more body roll around corners that it did before replacing the stock tires. I put the new michelin 205/80/r16 (which supercedes the old stock tire) on. I thought that at first it might just be the fact that they had too much air but after deflating to about 40psi it still seemed to have more roll than before. I called my buddy to ask about factory psi settings and they said 28psi front and 36psi rear. This seemed awfully low. Has anyone had any similar experience and if so, what was the remedy or was there one? (just live with it) Chris 91 RR County e-mail: cdillard@aholdusa.com ------------------------------[ <- Message 3 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 971208 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Sun, 07 Dec 1997 17:30:25 +0100 From: Adrian Redmond <channel6@post2.tele.dk> Subject: Re: Tires and Body Roll ! Any connection? Hi Chris, I have also suspected the standard pressures being too low - it always seems that the tires are "bulging" at the bottom - however I have checked this many times and the 28/36 for a 109 and 28/32 for a 88 seem comon words of wisdom from other owners. In the winter I drop mine as low as 18psi - to get a better grip on the ice and snow, but I think inner tubes are necessary for this game. As for the roll, my only guess is that new tires are more supple - the wire mesh isn't work hardened and the rubber isn't hardened by frost and sunlight - but that's just a guess. I have also noticed that new tires, on the same pressures, seem more "spongy". I think that this is a point for debate on the list - others might clarify this issue - of course there are those over the pond who would naturally ask "what sort of air are you using" as theirs may be a little more spongy to begin with? :-) Lets see what the collective oracle comes up with - I'd love to hear the real answer myself. Adrian Redmond --------------------------------------------------- CHANNEL 6 TELEVISION DENMARK (Adrian Redmond) Foerlevvej 6 Mesing DK-8660 Skanderborg Denmark --------------------------------------------------- telephone (office) +45 86 57 22 66 telephone (home) +45 86 57 22 64 telefacsimile / data +45 86 57 24 46 mobile GSM (EFP unit) +45 40 74 75 64 mobile GSM (admin) +45 40 54 22 66 mobile NMT +45 30 86 75 66 e-mail channel6@post2.tele.dk HoTMaiL (www.e-mail) channel6denmark@hotmail.com --------------------------------------------------- Visit our homepages! www.channel6.dk --------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------[ <- Message 4 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 971208 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Sun, 7 Dec 1997 12:04:14 -0500 (EST) From: Nick Fankhauser <nickf@co.wayne.in.us> Subject: re: DOT4 (more on brake fluid) >I don't mind so much, but it would be nice >to get the proper stuff. Can't seem to find it anywhere here. >Con Seitl You can order Girling fluid from Rovers North- Costs an arm & a leg, but still a lot less than silicone and cheaper than ordering brake parts. Many other brands really do damage Girling brake components- They don't crumble away or anything dramatic- just start leaking sooner than they should. It is also true that silicone won't hurt them however... In fact many products designed to protect rubber contain silicone, so I'm using the silicone to avoid water problems. A quick note about obtaining silicone fluid- when I tried to buy it from a local "speed shop", they gave me "racing brake fluid", which has a really high boiling point and doesn't compress a bit. They didn't understand that I was in it for the non-hydrophyllic aspect, and thought they were doing me a favor by giving me a "better" high performance product. So... read the ingredient labels and make sure you're really getting what you want. I later found that most NAPA stores stock it. One more thing- you still shouldn't get it on your paint- while silicone doesn't ruin your paint job like regular brake fluid, it does soak in & keep new paint from ever sticking to that spot again. -NickF Nick Fankhauser |Wayne County Information Systems Department NickF@co.wayne.in.us | http://www.co.wayne.in.us/wayneco http://www.infocom.com/~nickf ------------------------------[ <- Message 5 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 971208 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Sun, 07 Dec 1997 12:09:54 From: David Kurzman <kurzman@ix.netcom.com> Subject: Marvel Mystery Oil I had one of those Ampco upper engine oil vapor lubricators on my old 88 to help cope with the lack of lead in the gas. Now I've got another 88 and was wondering if I could just dump some Marvel Mystery oil in with the gas to help stave off the valve recession. This L-R is a '66 88 2.25 gas model and the head has never been converted. It has 160,000 miles on it and seems to be in fine shape. But the last 10 years have only seen about 10,000 miles added to the milage so I was thinking about some prevent. maint. Any idea how much M.M. oil should be added to about 5-8 gallons of gas? Or should I just not worry about and pull the head when I have to? Best, Dave in Va. ------------------------------[ <- Message 6 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 971208 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: SPYDERS <SPYDERS@aol.com> Date: Sun, 7 Dec 1997 12:16:37 EST Subject: Re: Tires and Body Roll ! Any connection? In a message dated 12/7/97 11:11:47 AM, you wrote: >I thought >that at first it might just be the fact that they had too much air but >after deflating to about 40psi it still seemed to have more roll than >before. I called my buddy to ask about factory psi settings and they said >28psi front and 36psi rear. This seemed awfully low. My 110 has similar pressures in the tires now, (they may be 28/38 or 28/40) and it seems to work fine. Initially, I thought the 28-front seemed too low, but apparently it isn't. When I ran the rears at lower pressures, I noticed bizarre cornering, with a mushier rolling motion and vague turn-in. Thw sidewalls also scuffed quite a bit. When I lowered the front pressure too much, the sidewall corners got scratched and scuffed. Maybe it has to do with there being no anti-roll bar up front (sway bar), more than with the weight distribution... pat 93 110 ------------------------------[ <- Message 7 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 971208 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Sun, 07 Dec 1997 11:34:16 -1000 From: kiotee@mcn.net (Roy Caldwell) Subject: Re: ECR stealing *my* thunder! >P.S., The brits did make computers -- Anyone remember the Sinclair ZX81? Or >Amstrad (I've got two Amstrads (and another coming from Oz) in my collection >and would love a Sinclair QL!) >--------------------------------------------------------------------- O- >Uncle Roger "There is pleasure pure in being mad >roger@sinasohn.com that none but madmen know." [ truncated by list-digester (was 14 lines)] >San Francisco, California http://www.crl.com/~sinasohn/ >Uncle, I have a Sinclair ZX81 with the expanded memory and all of the documentation because I built it. You want it? Let me know. Roy Rovers aren't the only thigns I have built!!!! ------------------------------[ <- Message 8 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 971208 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Subject: Re: What a wonderful tool!! Date: Sun, 7 Dec 97 19:43:20 +0100 From: Marc Rengers <mr@grant.media-gn.nl> Is that really oil under your engine-bay? (look at http://Gawain.soc.staffs.ac.uk/~cmtdmp/play/lrover/misc/landy.jpg) I hope so, otherwise check if there's still oil in the places oil should be (and leaking from......) Marc Rengers mr@grant.media-gn.nl Westeremden, Holland http://minerva.media-gn.nl/landrover Tel: (+31) 0596-551334 Pager: (+31) 06-59111461 #=====# #=========# #=========# |___|__\___ |_______|__\___ |_______|__\___ | _ | |_ |} | _ | |_ |} | _ | |_ |} "(_)""""(_)" ""(_)"""""""(_)" ""(_)"""""""(_)" 1977 88" III 2.25 1987 110" 300 TDi 1968 109" 2.25 petrol 23-67-XB diesel VS-GG-16 petrol unknown reg. was a StaWag (RH-12-PF) soon with the 2.5 n/a diesel SOLD !!! and 2.5 n/a diesel and with coil-sprungs also subscribed to LAND ROVER Owner International (great magazine) ------------------------------[ <- Message 9 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 971208 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Sun, 07 Dec 1997 15:01:04 -0400 From: john cranfield <john.cranfield@ns.sympatico.ca> Subject: Re: Lockers I have just put a Detroit locker in the rear of my 109 witha salisbury axle. It was easy to install. the difference is almost unbelievable in the mud and snow. It cost $319.00 US from Reider Racing at 313 946 1330. John and Muddy( who is now muddier than ever) ------------------------------[ <- Message 10 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 971208 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Sun, 7 Dec 1997 16:30:25 -0500 (EST) From: Russ Wilson <rwilson@usaor.net> Subject: Re: Lockers >I have just put a Detroit locker in the rear of my 109 witha salisbury >axle. It was easy to install. the difference is almost unbelievable in >the mud and snow. It cost $319.00 US from Reider Racing at 313 946 1330. > John and Muddy( who is now muddier than ever) John and Muddy, Does the regular rover axle use the same type of locker? I guess a better way to ask this is to say... If I were to get a locker and upgrade later to a Salisbury would I need to buy a new locker as well?? Russ Wilson Leslie Bittner Fort Pitt Land Rover Group Pittsburgh, Pa. ------------------------------[ <- Message 11 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 971208 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Sun, 7 Dec 1997 16:23:25 -0600 (CST) From: Uncle Roger <sinasohn@ricochet.net> Subject: Re: Land Rover Buyer's Kit At 10:44 PM 12/5/97 -0800, you wrote: >Would you mind explaining the Corn Flakes thing? I don't get it. Charles Kellogg, who recently spammed the LRO list with his "buyer's guide" ad owns British Northwest LR. Based on my experience with him when I was a new and naive LRO, I have a very low opinion of him, his business practices, and his general sanity. Because of the similarity of his last name with that of a certain midwest cereal manufacturer, someone gave him the nickname "Corn Flakes", which, IMO, is doubly apt because of the connotation of corn (as in corny) and flake. Basically, I wouldn't sell him a sack of sh*t for a million bucks, let alone buy anything from him. >[Granny mentioned Corn Flakes in an OOB conversation we were having today, and OOB = Out Of Body? >BTW, In case the non-NADA or NADA-but-not-west-coast people haven't gotten this >yet, British Northwest is not reeeeal popurlar in these (N. Cal to Seattle) >parts. There are those who seem to think he's not such a bad guy, and probably isn't the devil incarnate, but I wouldn't be surprised if they were really closet j**p owners... 8^) Uncle Roger "There is pleasure pure in being mad roger@sinasohn.com that none but madmen know." Roger Louis Sinasohn & Associates San Francisco, California http://www.crl.com/~sinasohn/ ------------------------------[ <- Message 12 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 971208 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Sun, 07 Dec 1997 19:00:43 -0400 From: john cranfield <john.cranfield@ns.sympatico.ca> Subject: Re: Lockers Russ Wilson wrote: > >I have just put a Detroit locker in the rear of my 109 witha salisbury > >axle. It was easy to install. the difference is almost unbelievable in > [ truncated by lro-lite (was 6 lines)] > >the mud and snow. It cost $319.00 US from Reider Racing at 313 946 1330. > > John and Muddy( who is now muddier than ever) > John and Muddy, Does the regular rover axle use the same type of locker? I [ truncated by list-digester (was 17 lines)] > Fort Pitt Land Rover Group > Pittsburgh, Pa. In a word yes. The Salisbury is built inthe same style as a Dana 60 or a GMC 12 bolt in that the pinion and the carrier bearings are fitted into the axle casing unlike the Rover unit which is of the "third member" type. None of components interchange between the Rover axle and the Salisbury. Too bad for your plans though John and Muddy ( who was born with a Salisbury) ------------------------------[ <- Message 13 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 971208 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Sun, 07 Dec 1997 15:10:33 -0800 From: "Christopher H. Dow" <dow@thelen.org> Subject: Re: Land Rover Buyer's Kit Uncle Roger wrote: > >Would you mind explaining the Corn Flakes thing? I don't get it. > Charles Kellogg, who recently spammed the LRO list with his "buyer's guide" 8< > Because of the similarity of his last name with that of a certain midwest > cereal manufacturer, someone gave him the nickname "Corn Flakes", which, > IMO, is doubly apt because of the connotation of corn (as in corny) and > flake. I finally figured that out. Bob B. sent mail this morning claiming credit for the nickname. Nice work, Bob. By the way, one of the (cereal) Kellogg brothers was a serious nut case. He inspired the fabulous book and mediocre movie The Road To Wellsville. > >[Granny mentioned Corn Flakes in an OOB conversation we were having today, and > OOB = Out Of Body? Out of band. My big problem with "Corn Flakes" was that he was the only parts souce my stepfather could find when he owned a '62 IIA hard top. Eventually, my stepfather sold the car due to frustration with Corn Flakes. This was several years before we became LROs. C ------------------------------[ <- Message 14 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 971208 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Sun, 07 Dec 1997 18:28:27 -0500 From: David L Glaser <dlglaser@wam.umd.edu> Subject: Turbo Diesel Conversion I'm trying to save up some money for a 88". Hopefully i'll have enough to buy one this summer. Anyway, I've been thinking alot about which model to buy. I've always wanted a 88". with a hardtop for winter/fall and a softop for spring/summer. but I can't decide if i want a diesel or petrol. i like the diesel for its lack of engine electrics (thus less effected by water), high tourque, and good mpgs. But its slow speed (compaired to the petrol) scares me a bit. So, I've thought about a few solutions for better performance. I could replace the 2.25 with a 2.5. That would give me a few extra hp. But, I was thinking of a turbo conversion. That would give the performance (even possibly better!) of the petrol, but with all of the advantages of the diesel. Janspeed in England offers a turbo kit for the 2.25/2.5. So, I'm considering that. But, would the exhaust and intake manifold from the 2.5 TD fit a 2.5 or 2.25 NA? That way I could purchase second hand parts, for a relatively cheap conversion. Also, were diesels ever offically imported into the US? All of the diesels i've seen in the US were imported privately. thanks David Glaser '94 Discovery "La Ruta Maya #6" '94 Discovery, Teal ------------------------------[ <- Message 15 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 971208 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Sun, 07 Dec 1997 18:46:38 -0500 From: "William L. Leacock" <wleacock@pipeline.com> Subject: axle Jim, it appears that your front ax;e casing may be bent, the symptoms you describe are typical. Casings bend relatively easily on the long half shafy side. Some careful welding of a reinforcing piece may help to pull it back in shape, but is is probably simpler, whilst you have it in pieces to change it. Bill Leacock ( Limey in exile ) 88 and 109 LR's and 89 RR ------------------------------[ <- Message 16 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 971208 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Sun, 7 Dec 1997 17:03:30 -0800 (PST) From: Tom Spoto <tspoto@az.com> Subject: Re: axle On Sun, 7 Dec 1997, William L. Leacock wrote: > Jim, it appears that your front ax;e casing may be bent, the symptoms you > describe are typical. Casings bend relatively easily on the long half shafy > side. > Some careful welding of a reinforcing piece may help to pull it back in > shape, but is is probably simpler, whilst you have it in pieces to change it. > Bill Leacock ( Limey in exile ) [ truncated by list-digester (was 11 lines)] > Bill Leacock ( Limey in exile ) > 88 and 109 LR's and 89 RR When I purchased the Rover that became my daily driver, it had a jerking reaction to engaging the front drive shaft. When I went looked at the axle it had pieces of 3/8" flat bar welded to the left side of the axle. I figured bent axle housing. Went to take the axle apart and found the axleshafts very difficult to remove. finally pried them out. Removed the Diff and found a 1/8" steel plate in place of the large gasket. My axleshaft were way out of line. A new housing and all is right. Still have no idea why the 1/8" shim was there. There was a dent in the case that would have allowed the ring gear to rub on the case but it would be simple to pound it out. Thats my STOP (Stupid Previous Owner Trick) Tom Spoto '67' 88" Canvas top, I'm working on putting it back on the road '72' 88" Truck Cab, The daily driver '72' 88" Parts Source Hit by logging truck, one day I'll put it right ------------------------------[ <- Message 17 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 971208 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Mon, 08 Dec 1997 02:13:35 +0100 From: Adrian Redmond <121407237875@tele.dk> Subject: Re: axle I have one of those "specially reinforced axles" now I know why!!! Luckily I don't have a problem with it so it seems that, in this instance, the SPOT worked. But I had not realised that that was the reason! thanks! Adrian Redmond --------------------------------------------------- CHANNEL 6 TELEVISION DENMARK (Adrian Redmond) Foerlevvej 6 Mesing DK-8660 Skanderborg Denmark --------------------------------------------------- telephone (office) +45 86 57 22 66 telephone (home) +45 86 57 22 64 telefacsimile / data +45 76 57 24 46 mobile GSM (EFP unit) +45 40 74 75 64 mobile GSM (admin) +45 40 50 22 66 mobile NMT +45 30 86 75 66 e-mail channel6@post2.tele.dk HoTMaiL (www.e-mail) channel6denmark@hotmail.com --------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------[ <- Message 18 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 971208 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Sun, 7 Dec 1997 21:01:29 -0500 (EST) From: Russ Wilson <rwilson@usaor.net> Subject: Re: Lockers >Russ Wilson wrote: >> >I have just put a Detroit locker in the rear of my 109 witha salisbury >> >axle. It was easy to install. the difference is almost unbelievable in > [ truncated by lro-lite (was 17 lines)] >> Leslie Bittner >> Fort Pitt Land Rover Group >> Pittsburgh, Pa. [ truncated by list-digester (was 18 lines)] > Too bad for your plans though > John and Muddy ( who was born with a Salisbury) Thanks for the info... I guess the long term upgrade plan for a locker will now include a Salisbury axle as well... From what I have head there is nothing that does more to improve off-road performance than a locker...keep everyone posted on the long term performance of the piece. Russ Wilson Leslie Bittner Fort Pitt Land Rover Group Pittsburgh, Pa. ------------------------------[ <- Message 19 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 971208 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Sun, 7 Dec 1997 18:52:31 -0800 (PST) From: Tom Spoto <tspoto@az.com> Subject: Re: Axle > simple to pound it out. Thats my STOP (Stupid Previous Owner Trick) That should have been SPOT not STOP my apologies. Tom Spoto ------------------------------[ <- Message 20 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 971208 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Sun, 7 Dec 1997 22:33:01 -0500 From: "William S. Kowalski" <70252.1204@compuserve.com> Subject: IIA Transmission question I know there are a few answers or helpfull comments out there in Rover Land: The transmission in my everday driver '67 109" IIA developed a problem of being unable to shift on the go from first to second, but can start up in second gear ok, but as soon as letting up on the gas, to shift into third, a horrible ($$$$) gear against gear noise occurs. So, pulled the transmission, dissasembled, and found trouble with the layshaft integral shoulder holding second gear in place, missing. In fact, the split ring (2 pieces) and the ten small pieces from the layshaft shoulder came out when I drained the gearbox oil. I can't believe one of the pieces didn't get in between the meshing gears and cause real $$$$$$$ problems as I was still driving the vehicle! The gear noise ($$$$) was caused by the second gear freely going against the reverse idler assembly. According to the various service manuals, etc. there have been two designs to hold the second gear in place, (1) the split ring, and (2) raised integral shaft. I get the feeling the design of locating the angle cut second gear with lots of thrust, is a weak point in the design. First question, do I buy a new layshaft and wait for the problem to develope again in thirty years, or is there a way to re-machine the current layshaft for a retainer clip to hold the split ring? A retainer ring, on the other hand, may not be strong enough to hold the pressure presented by the angle cut second gear, and fail soon. Second question, have my shifting techniques, or habits, caused the failure? Has anyone else experienced the above problem?? Bill Kowalski Chicago, Illinois '67 LR 109" IIA '63 Austin-Healey BJ-7 '53 RR Bentley "R" ------------------------------[ <- Message 21 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 971208 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Sun, 7 Dec 1997 22:46:02 -0500 (EST) From: rover@pinn.net (Alexander P. Grice) Subject: Girling and other fluids Following the thread on brake fluids, Mike Johnson wrote: >Another chapter from the book of urban myths.... I dunno, Mike. It depends upon how old your rubbers are. ;-) British wheel cylinder and master seals used to be made of *natural* rubber. For these, only Girling "Crimson" or the later Castrol "LMA" would work. These are glycol (vegetable) based, vs. petroleum-based American fluids. I believe DOT 3 = glycol, DOT 4 = glycol + petroleum ether, DOT 5 = silicone. Petroleum based fluids *will* consume natural rubber seals - like in less than a week. However, about a dozen or more years ago, the British switched to neoprene/hypalon for brake parts, whereas US-made seals have been neoprene since the ealry or mid-1960's. There are also compatibility problems. (What happens when you mix LMA and silicone? Cold fusion? I dunno. You're just not supposed to do it.) But you want an absolutely clean system when you make the switch to silicone. I removed all cylinder pistons/seals, drained the master, then filled it with 95% isopropanol. After pumping through the lines, they were blown dry with compressed air. Silicone won't rot seals, but then I won't swell them, either. Some of the earlier Lockheed systems were designed so that the rubber seals *should* swell; use silicone and the seals will leak. Still, silicone is the best way to go...save for the expense of the fluid. When I rebuilt the system several years ago, the total cost (save for the fluid at $7/pint) was <$22. $17 for the dual master kit, American-made piston seals at $.50 apiece from the local brake shop. I washed (dish washing soap, *not* brake cleaner) and reused the dust caps. Cheers *---"Jeep may be famous, LAND-ROVER is Legendary"----* | A. P. (Sandy) Grice | | Rover Owners' Association of Virginia, Ltd. | | "The oldest Rover-marque club in the Americas" | | 1633 Melrose Parkway, Norfolk, VA 23508-1730 | | E-mail: rover@pinn.net Phone: 757-622-7054 (Day) | | 757-423-4898 (Evenings) FAX: 757-622-7056 | | | *---1972 Series III 88"-----1996 Discovery SE-7(m)---* ------------------------------[ <- Message 22 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 971208 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Sun, 7 Dec 1997 22:45:58 -0500 (EST) From: rover@pinn.net (Alexander P. Grice) Subject: Oil's well that end well Gavin Smith wrote: >My O/D makes oil!!!! I suspect the the transfer vox is pressurizing and >blowing oil into the O/D (seeing as the transfer doesn't have a breather) Interesting. Verrrry interesting. My T-box fills at the O/D's expense. The O/D is uphill from the oil level in the T-box, so I don't see how oil can run up hill - but then again, laws of physics don't always apply to these vehicles.... I've put an axle breather on the T-box in the hopes that over pressure after a long hot drive would vent and not send oil out the back. (When I see spots on the rear window, it's time to open the fill plug and drain off the excess.) Now that I think about it, once the vehicle cools down and a vacuum is created, it's liable to pull from the O/D, since there isn't the jostling of ball bearing in the axle breather to break the vacuum. Looks like it's time for that breather tube.... *---"Jeep may be famous, LAND-ROVER is Legendary"----* | A. P. (Sandy) Grice | | Rover Owners' Association of Virginia, Ltd. | | "The oldest Rover-marque club in the Americas" | | 1633 Melrose Parkway, Norfolk, VA 23508-1730 | | E-mail: rover@pinn.net Phone: 757-622-7054 (Day) | | 757-423-4898 (Evenings) FAX: 757-622-7056 | | | *---1972 Series III 88"-----1996 Discovery SE-7(m)---* ------------------------------[ <- Message 23 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 971208 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Sun, 07 Dec 1997 22:50:00 -0500 From: David Cockey <dcockey@tir.com> Subject: Re: Marvel Mystery Oil David Kurzman wrote: > I had one of those Ampco upper engine oil vapor lubricators on my > old 88 to help cope with the lack of lead in the gas. Now I've got > another > 88 and was wondering if I could just dump some Marvel Mystery oil in > with > the gas to help stave off the valve recession..... Any idea how much > M.M. oil should be added to about 5-8 gallons of gas? As far as I know Marvel Mystery oil is contains hydrocarbons but no metals. Leaded gasoline protects against valve seat recession because a thin coating of a lead based compound forms on the valve seat. I don't think adding just hydrocarbons to the fuel will do any good. The lead "substitues" I've seen for valve seat protection contain manganese. Regards, David Cockey ------------------------------[ <- Message 24 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 971208 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Sun, 07 Dec 1997 23:15:33 -0500 From: David Cockey <dcockey@tir.com> Subject: Re: Land Rover Buyer's Kit Uncle Roger wrote about BNW: > There are those who seem to think he's not such a bad guy, and > probably > isn't the devil incarnate, but I wouldn't be surprised if they were > really > closet j**p owners... 8^) I've ordered some parts with no problems though you need to check prices. When I was first interested in LRs and called with a few questions, I was amused to hear some of the claims. Does anyone know of a good flat fender Jeep for sale? Regards, David Cockey '60 SII 88 SW '60 SII 88 PU Former owner of a '64 CJ5 ------------------------------[ <- Message 25 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 971208 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: BarrieWyLR <BarrieWyLR@aol.com> Date: Sun, 7 Dec 1997 23:15:56 EST Subject: Re: Lockers Bill Davis at 801-486-5049 should be able to help you out. He put a KAM air locker in my SII. Tell him I said hi. Be Happy Barrie ------------------------------[ <- Message 26 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 971208 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Sun, 07 Dec 1997 21:09:43 -0800 From: Granville Pool <gpool@pacific.net> Subject: Re: Land Rover Buyer's Kit-Spam Pat wrote: >HEY, NORTHWORST, IN FAIRNESS TO THOSE THAT HAVE RECEIVED THIS IN THE PAST, Pat and all others who are trying to get a message to Charlie (Chas. Kellogg, dba BNWLR) via this list >>> He's *not* a member. Yes, his posting is *Pure Spam* and no one who knows him will be greatly surprised. Cheers, Granny ------------------------------[ <- Message 27 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 971208 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Sun, 07 Dec 1997 21:27:25 -0800 From: Granville Pool <gpool@pacific.net> Subject: Re: Land Rover Buyer's Kit Chris, >By the way, one of the (cereal) Kellogg brothers was a serious nut case. He >inspired the fabulous book and mediocre movie The Road To Wellsville. He got all the fame and his brother was the one who came up with the enduring product. All the more to favor the comparison with Charlie. >My big problem with "Corn Flakes" was that he was the only parts souce my >stepfather could find when he owned a '62 IIA hard top. Eventually, my >stepfather sold the car due to frustration with Corn Flakes. This was several >years before we became LROs. You see? Granny ------------------------------[ <- Message 28 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 971208 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: CIrvin1258 <CIrvin1258@aol.com> Date: Mon, 8 Dec 1997 01:33:12 EST Subject: Re: Turbo Diesel Conversion "Also, were diesels ever imported into the country officially?" Nope. For some reason that seems to have alot to do with cubic inches, Rover only imported/imports petrol power, to the USA. Folks here tend to think that gasoline is best. It is - sometimes, but when you're making a very sudden river crossing (as in "Gee, that water was never there before..."), the diesel won't short out it's ignition wires! They aren't THAT slow, either. I can get mine upto 75mph on a good day, and can cruise at 65-70 all the time. I only bog down, when hitting the right grade. I'd like to do a turbo conversion myself, but I think I'll just save my pennies, and get a Tdi engine. That is, if I can ever save any pennies! Charles ------------------------------[ <- Message 29 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 971208 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Richard Marsden"<rmarsden@digicon-egr.co.uk> Date: Mon, 8 Dec 1997 08:51:47 +0000 Subject: Re: ECR stealing *my* thunder! The Sinclair Z88 is still around - I still use mine. In fact, I used it yesterday. Still a very practical portable computer. How many *true* laptops can run off batteries for 22 hours, and weigh less than a kilo? Also, it only cost me 50 quid for "as new" condition! :-) Fine for a notepad, although it also handles spreadsheets, Basic, Assembler,etc,etc. Richard (ex-Gurkha SIII 109 FFR) SPYDERS@aol.com on 12/06/97 01:35:31 PM Please respond to lro@playground.sun.com cc: (bcc: Richard Marsden/EAME/VDGC) Subject: Re: ECR stealing *my* thunder! In a message dated 12/6/97 3:45:26 AM, you wrote: >P.S., The brits did make computers -- Anyone remember the Sinclair ZX81? Or >Amstrad (I've got two Amstrads (and another coming from Oz) in my collection >and would love a Sinclair QL!) Not only do I remember them, but I had to use them as well. We were taught on the Sinclair "Zed-Exes", then moved up to the *big, fast* Amstrad. I thought I'd left it all behind when I see the ECU on my rover, it looks suspiciously like a black Sinclair without the (cassette) tape drive... pat 93 110 ------------------------------[ <- Message 30 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 971208 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Mon, 08 Dec 1997 09:44:07 +0000 From: Duncan Phillips <dunk@ivanhoe.soc.staffs.ac.uk> Subject: Re: What a wonderful tool!! At 19:43 07/12/97 +0100, you wrote: >Is that really oil under your engine-bay? >(look at >http://Gawain.soc.staffs.ac.uk/~cmtdmp/play/lrover/misc/landy.jpg) >I hope so, otherwise check if there's still oil in the places oil should >be (and leaking from......) No, at the time the pic was taken, the water pump needed replacing, so it's only water/coolant. I do however have a very slow oil leak where the main crankshaft oil seal is on it's way out - I can live with it at the moment!! ******************************* Duncan Phillips 1980 SWB SIII 'Evie' http://Gawain.soc.staffs.ac.uk/~cmtdmp/play/lrover/ ******************************* ------------------------------[ <- Message 31 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 971208 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Mon, 08 Dec 1997 13:34:40 +0200 From: Paul Oxley <paul@adventures.co.za> Subject: Minamalism, was Re: ECR stealing *my* thunder! Richard Marsden wrote: > The Sinclair Z88 is still around - I still use mine. In fact, I used it > yesterday. Still a very practical portable computer. > How many *true* laptops can run off batteries for 22 hours, and weigh less > than a kilo? > Also, it only cost me 50 quid for "as new" condition! :-) > Fine for a notepad, although it also handles spreadsheets, Basic, > Assembler,etc,etc. [ truncated by list-digester (was 10 lines)] > Assembler,etc,etc. > Richard (ex-Gurkha SIII 109 FFR) And I'm going to attempt a complete engine overhaul on the 2a using only my Leatherman :-) I guess it's feasible, but WHY??? Regards Paul Oxley AfricanAdrenalin, your online African adventure specialists http://AfricanAdrenalin.co.za & http://AfricanAdrenalin.com into Africa adventures, your African adventure webzine http://Adventures.co.za BTW, Richard, who'd ever have though the All Blacks could be stopped.... ------------------------------[ <- Message 32 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 971208 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Alan_Richer/CAM/Lotus@lotus.com Date: Mon, 8 Dec 1997 06:43:06 -0500 Subject: Re: Turbo Diesel Conversion Clirvin adds that Rovers with Dieseld were never imported by Rover. Sorry to disappoint you - not true. My 109 was originally a Diesel, and I have his original manufacturing sheet and such. It quite clearly points him into the port of Boston, and lists him as made for Rover NA. ajr ------------------------------[ <- Message 33 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 971208 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
END OF * LIST DIGEST Input: messages 32 lines 1423 [forwarded 144 whitespace 362] Output: lines 1090 [content 551 forwarded 114 (cut 30) whitespace 332][ First Message | Table of Contents | <- Digest 971208 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Back | Forward | |
---|---|---|
Photos & text Copyright 1990-2011 Bill Caloccia, All rights reserved. Digest Messages Copyright 1990-2011 by the original poster or/and Bill Caloccia, All rights reserved.
|