[ First Message Last | Table of Contents | <- Digest -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
msg | Sender | lines | Subject |
1 | NADdMD@aol.com | 16 | Re: NRC7314 and NRC7315 |
2 | Terje Krogdahl [tekr@nex | 23 | Re: Broken teeth in gearbox (lt95) |
3 | Solihull [Solihull@aol.c | 20 | 109 body parts needed! |
4 | David L Glaser [dlglaser | 19 | Re: Land Rover 6-cyl engines |
5 | "LT J Jackson" [lt_j_jac | 24 | Re- Headliner |
6 | dbobeck@inetgate.ushmm.o | 27 | Re: Removing exhaust pipe bolts |
7 | David Russell [David_R@m | 60 | [not specified] |
8 | DEFENDER@ibm.net | 19 | for sale 2 (prices) |
9 | twakeman@scruznet.com (T | 19 | RE: Washboard caused damage |
10 | "Richard Marsden"[rmarsd | 37 | RE: Washboard caused damage |
11 | Franz Parzefall [franz@p | 23 | Re: Washboard caused damage |
12 | Steve Mace [steve@solwis | 38 | RE: Re- Headliner |
13 | SPYDERS [SPYDERS@aol.com | 31 | Re: Washboard damage/Threadlockers |
14 | Andy Phillips [AnPi@nors | 37 | RE: Washboard caused damage |
15 | "Richard Marsden"[rmarsd | 28 | Re: Washboard damage/Threadlockers |
16 | DEFENDER@ibm.net | 24 | [Fwd: TELLICO and Charlotte club] |
17 | Andy Phillips [AnPi@nors | 22 | RE: Washboard caused damage |
18 | "Richard Marsden"[rmarsd | 32 | RE: Washboard caused damage |
19 | "Richard Marsden"[rmarsd | 22 | Active Volume Controls |
20 | DEFENDER@ibm.net | 11 | Re: Active Volume Controls |
21 | SPYDERS [SPYDERS@aol.com | 43 | Re: RE: Washboard caused damage |
22 | SPYDERS [SPYDERS@aol.com | 34 | Re: Active Volume Controls (*not* a suggestion) |
23 | "Richard Marsden"[rmarsd | 72 | Re: Active Volume Controls (*not* a suggestion) |
24 | dbobeck@inetgate.ushmm.o | 18 | Re[2]: Active Volume Controls (*not* a suggestion) |
25 | Bob Watson [bobw@microso | 43 | RE: Car Wash Engine Problem |
26 | David Scheidt [david@mat | 21 | Radiator muffs |
27 | Paul Wakefield [pwakefie | 42 | Railco and ramblings |
28 | Paul Quin [Paul_Quin@pml | 15 | Out in the rain. |
29 | Paul Quin [Paul_Quin@pml | 32 | FW: Out in the rain. (2nd attempt) |
30 | "LT J Jackson" [lt_j_jac | 26 | Repair Manuals |
31 | Rick Grant [rgrant@cadvi | 19 | Removing exhaust fittings --thanks |
32 | Graham Furniss [graham@f | 64 | Re: Railco and ramblings |
33 | "Eyres, Richard RP" [Eyr | 36 | RE: Skid plates & rock sliders for SIII 88 |
34 | Doug Tully [dtully@ix.ne | 11 | Long Distance Hauling |
35 | CIrvin1258@aol.com | 17 | Re: Washboard caused damage |
36 | DEFENDER@ibm.net | 8 | ROAV WEB SITE? |
37 | tashworth@sonar.com (Tom | 22 | frame |
38 | Uncle Roger [sinasohn@ri | 36 | Re: Commuting in a Series |
39 | Uncle Roger [sinasohn@ri | 71 | Guns and Rovers (long and irrelevant) |
40 | "Vel N." [vel@mcs.net> | 17 | new exhaust |
41 | Jeff Goldman [roverboy@g | 26 | Defender front ends... |
42 | CIrvin1258@aol.com | 52 | Re: TeriAnn's concern |
43 | ASFCO@worldnet.att.net | 14 | Kenlowe Hot Start |
44 | Winn Bearden [wbearden@a | 29 | Re: Defender front ends... |
45 | rover@pinn.net (Alexande | 25 | Springs |
46 | Jeremy Bartlett [bartlet | 19 | Re: Broken teeth in gearbox (lt95) |
47 | Dean Meyer [Dean.Meyer@i | 30 | Re: frame |
48 | philippe.carchon@rug.ac. | 33 | few questions |
49 | "Davies, Scott" [sdavies | 18 | Re: Railco and ramblings |
50 | Duncan Phillips [dunk@iv | 46 | Re: Kenlowe Hot Start |
51 | David Scheidt [david@mat | 17 | Re: Kenlowe Hot Start |
52 | Graham Furniss [graham@f | 35 | Re: Railco and ramblings |
From: NADdMD@aol.com Date: Tue, 4 Nov 1997 07:04:19 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: NRC7314 and NRC7315 In a message dated 97-11-03 23:51:26 EST, you write: protection plates? They are kind of home made looking aluminum things bolted between the spring plate and spring. Anyone know what the heck they do? >> These are, I believe, the plates to protect the brake lines just before they enter the brake cylinders in the rear. Nate ------------------------------[ <- Message 2 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 971105 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 1997 13:40:20 +0100 (MET) From: Terje Krogdahl <tekr@nextel.no> Subject: Re: Broken teeth in gearbox (lt95) On Tue, 4 Nov 1997, Doug McPherson wrote: > Quite a bit of your basic small metal filings/flakes too. > They're silvery, not brass/yellow. Not much experience with the lt95 box, but: Using a magnet, try to find out if the silvery filings are steel or aluminum. Steel filings come from gears, shafts and bearings, while aluminum is usually from the gearbox casing, typically caused by bearings rotating in their seats in the casing... which is bad news. Just my .02 øre. TK Norwegian Land Rover Club www.land.rover.no 1972 SIII 88" 2.25 petrol ------------------------------[ <- Message 3 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 971105 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Solihull <Solihull@aol.com> Date: Tue, 4 Nov 1997 07:46:56 EST Subject: 109 body parts needed! I need a set of the 'tee' pieces for a 109 sw I'm reframing. I also have a need for a Scotty's adapter and chevy six. I haven't called any of the regular suppliers, thought I'd try the list first. The above are for two different 109s. Thanks!! Cheers!! John Dillingham in Woodstock, GA KF4NAS LROA #1095 73 s3 swb 25902676b DD "Pansy" 72 s3 swb 25900502a rusted, in suspended animation Looking for a P5 project, well, OK, or a P6 or another SD1 Vintage Rover Service--Since 1994, just about a couple dozen satisfied customers!! ------------------------------[ <- Message 4 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 971105 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Tue, 04 Nov 1997 07:58:17 -0500 From: David L Glaser <dlglaser@wam.umd.edu> Subject: Re: Land Rover 6-cyl engines > The NADA engine has the "Westlake head" which has the rocker arm > assembly which bolts to the top of the head and the and a seperate > longer bolt on intake manifold. The westlake head is the same as on >the 3.0 Rover car engine. So, is correct of me to assume that a 3.0 Rover head is a direct bolt-on to the 2.6 engine? So you could pretty much make your own NADA engine? > I am considering using a 3.0L engine to put in my > NADA 109 Safari Wagon which came without and engine and trans. Is this also a direct replacement? Would you know the HP and Torque of the 3.0 vs. 2.6 vs NADA 2.6? David Glaser ------------------------------[ <- Message 5 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 971105 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: 4 Nov 1997 08:15:00 -0400 From: "LT J Jackson" <lt_j_jackson@unixlink.uscga.edu> Subject: Re- Headliner Russ WIlson Wrote: Has anyone dealt with a company in the U.K. called "La Salle Inc"? They advertise in LRO for a one piece molded replacement headliner for a 90 that looks pretty nice in the picture. I have a shredded liner in the pig that needs to be totally replaced so I was thinking of giving tham a call to see if they make a model for a trop top 88 Russ: Pull up www.badgercoachworks.com. They make headliners for 88's, along with other trim parts. I just found them yesterday, and don't have a catalog yet so I can't give you prices. The web site has some good pictures of their products. They're in MA. Rgds, Jeff Jackson 73 SIII 88 (Camilla) Waterford, CT ------------------------------[ <- Message 6 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 971105 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: dbobeck@inetgate.ushmm.org Date: Tue, 04 Nov 97 08:29:22 EST Subject: Re: Removing exhaust pipe bolts >Any tips on how to safely remove the nuts holding the exhaust pipe to the >manifold? They're pretty heat corroded. Apart from wrapping them in rags >soaked in pentetrating oil for a day or so is there anything else that might >help? more heat, pb powerblaster penetrating oil, spray, heat, cool, spray, heat, cools spray, etc, etc... have fun!! later DaveB. Rick Grant 1959, SII "VORIZO" rgrant@cadvision.com www.cadvision.com/rgrant Cobra Media Communications. Calgary, Canada Aboriginal and International Relief Issues ------------------------------[ <- Message 7 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 971105 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Subject: re: Car Wash Engine Problem Date: Tue, 4 Nov 97 08:32:15 -0500 From: David Russell <David_R@mindspring.com> >From: RINGO JACK <RINGOJACK@aol.com> >Date: Mon, 3 Nov 1997 17:52:11 EST >Subject: Car Wash Engine Problem >I own a 96 Disco and have experienced engine trouble after a self done car >wash. I sprayed the engine off lightly with one of those high pressure >squirters but never applied full pressure, just gently washed it. Doesn't matter, if you got the ECU wet, you'll have this kind of = trouble. I can't remember where it's located but it _REALLY_ doesn't = like water. > When I >started it there was no problem, and I pulled out and drove for about 2 = miles >and then the RPM's started dropping when it was idle. Instead of being = idle >around 1000RPMS, it would drop to around 3-2 hundred RPM's and sputter Had the same problem after _splashing_ (see below) through mud = puddles at Mid-Atlantic. >blow out black smoke. No black smoke, however. >I thought this vehicle >could ford rivers?? The damn thing can't survive a car wash, so how can = it do >that?? It can, if done properly. First, max recommended depth, off the = showroom floor is 20". On the Sunday of Mid Atlantic we took our = Discovery off-road and up a stream (part of the trail, opened very = rarely). The water was over the door sills but we were going steadily = with a bow wave=8Bfast enough to keep water out but not so fast as to = splash water in. That's the trick. Electronics don't like water and = vehicles you see in pictures still running under water have been = heavily waterproofed. re: black smoke. You may want to ask the Coil-Sprung list if you = haven't already done so. Tell your friends SUBSCRIBE send a message = to: MajorDomo@Land-Rover.Team.Net with the text: subscribe cso-digest >Mark Roby >A concerned rover owner Cheers, David Russell http://www.mindspring.com/~david_r David_R@mindspring.com 1969 SIIA SWB (Pastel Green, 4-speed) 1997 SD (Oxford Blue, 5-speed) 1977 FJ40 (rust, 8-speed (hopefully still)) ------------------------------[ <- Message 8 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 971105 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: DEFENDER@ibm.net Date: Tue, 04 Nov 1997 08:38:58 -0500 Subject: for sale 2 (prices) I received an email requesting the prices for the items I listed earlier for sale. Here they are. Tuffy Centre console: sold Tuffy trunk $150.00 Set of 4 31X10.50 ridge runners on American racing wheels $400 I am on the SC/NC border. If anyone is interested, I am sure that some sort of shipping could be worked out. William PIttman 1997 D90 WAGON ------------------------------[ <- Message 9 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 971105 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 1997 06:19:06 -0800 From: twakeman@scruznet.com (TeriAnn Wakeman) Subject: RE: Washboard caused damage At 9:09 AM 11/4/97 +0000, Andy Phillips wrote: <snip> > However, I do find that a touch of superglue on any nuts etc that >I've just played with gives me peace of mind. My past experience with superglue is that it sticks well for a year or two then then stops sticking. I have used it to glue broken ornamental glass. After a year or so the part just falls off. TeriAnn Wakeman For personal mail, please start subject line Santa Cruz California with TW. I belong to 4 high volume mail lists twakeman@scruznet.com and do not read a lot of threads..Thanks "The box said 'Requires Windows 95, or better.' So I bought a Macintosh." ------------------------------[ <- Message 10 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 971105 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Richard Marsden"<rmarsden@digicon-egr.co.uk> Date: Tue, 4 Nov 1997 14:29:04 +0000 Subject: RE: Washboard caused damage Glues are complex things and you have to choose the glue for the job. Superglue is as good as useless on paper for instance. I've also tried the 2-part cyanoacrylite (sp) glues ("professional Superglue" if you like") and I can never get them to work! Superglue is excellent for what it was designed for - sticking skin together (surgery and first aid/Casualty applications). In which case, if it comes undone after 2 years, who cares? Richard (ex-Gurkha SIII 109 FFR epoxy-mobile) twakeman@scruznet.com on 11/04/97 02:19:06 PM Please respond to lro@playground.sun.com cc: (bcc: Richard Marsden/EAME/VDGC) Subject: RE: Washboard caused damage At 9:09 AM 11/4/97 +0000, Andy Phillips wrote: <snip> > However, I do find that a touch of superglue on any nuts etc that >I've just played with gives me peace of mind. My past experience with superglue is that it sticks well for a year or two then then stops sticking. I have used it to glue broken ornamental glass. After a year or so the part just falls off. TeriAnn Wakeman For personal mail, please start subject line Santa Cruz California with TW. I belong to 4 high volume mail lists twakeman@scruznet.com and do not read a lot of threads..Thanks "The box said 'Requires Windows 95, or better.' So I bought a Macintosh." ------------------------------[ <- Message 11 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 971105 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 1997 15:25:05 +0100 From: Franz Parzefall <franz@physiol.med.tu-muenchen.de> Subject: Re: Washboard caused damage On Tue, Nov 04, 1997 at 06:19:06AM -0800, TeriAnn Wakeman wrote: > My past experience with superglue is that it sticks well for a year or two > then then stops sticking. I have used it to glue broken ornamental glass. > After a year or so the part just falls off. May be superglue isn't the right stuff. Loctite make quite a range of products that are ment for securing nuts and bolts. A look in their catalog will probably help... just my .02DM Franz Franz Parzefall franz@physiol.med.tu-muenchen.de http://www.physiol.med.tu-muenchen.de/~franz _______ [____|\_\== [_-__|__|_-] Brumml, exmil. 1989 Land Rover 110 2.5D ___.._(0)..._.(0)__..- ------------------------------[ <- Message 12 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 971105 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 97 14:13:04 From: Steve Mace <steve@solwise.demon.co.uk> Subject: RE: Re- Headliner --- On 4 Nov 1997 08:15:00 -0400 LT J Jackson <lt_j_jackson@unixlink.uscga.edu> wrote: >Russ WIlson Wrote: >Has anyone dealt with a company in the U.K. called "La Salle Inc"? They >advertise in LRO for a one piece molded replacement headliner for a 90 that >looks pretty nice in the picture. I have a shredded liner in the pig that >needs to be totally replaced so I was thinking of giving tham a call to see >if they make a model for a trop top 88 [ truncated by list-digester (was 11 lines)] >if they make a model for a trop top 88 >Russ: -----------------End of Original Message----------------- I have both a full length roof lining and side linings for my 90 from La Salle. They are quite nice but I would say that they are a little difficult to fit - it's not easy to accurately cut the window cutouts and involves repeated "fitting, checking, taking out again, filing a bit more, refitting" like processes. Also the final fit is bit poor with some little-finger size gaps where the panels join. They are also not cheap. Overall they are okay though and I would not hesitate in getting them again for a future vehicle. Steve 1972 SIII LtWt 1993 D90 PS why do you call your LR the pig? It sounds so insulting! ------------------------------------- Name: Dr Steve Mace E-mail: steve@solwise.demon.co.uk www: http://www.demon.co.uk/solwise/ Tel: +44 1482 473899 Fax: +44 1482 472245 Date: 04/11/97 Time: 14:13:04 ------------------------------------- ------------------------------[ <- Message 13 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 971105 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: SPYDERS <SPYDERS@aol.com> Date: Tue, 4 Nov 1997 09:46:47 EST Subject: Re: Washboard damage/Threadlockers Instead of using superglue, which is too brittle as pointed out and experienced by some, why not use Loctite products which are designed for the job? There are several types for different applications, I forget their numbers, but here it is in general: Red- viscous liquid applied to threads prior to assembly; very strong hold Green- thin liquid which can be applied to previously assembled parts; removeable without extra force (personally, I'm not a big fan of applying threadlocker after the fact) Blue- standard threadlocker which is applied before assembly; removeable without extra force There are more, but with these three, your nuts & bolts ought to stay put. BTW, they also make a nice orange sealer which is recommended by porsche for their air-cooled engine case halves, which seal without gaskets. No connections, standard disclaimers, etc... oh yeah, none of them work on paper or skin lacerations ;-). pat 93 110 ------------------------------[ <- Message 14 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 971105 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Andy Phillips <AnPi@norsk-data.co.uk> Subject: RE: Washboard caused damage Date: Tue, 4 Nov 1997 14:49:15 -0000 Why did I quote superglue as a good product? I find that a year is probably the most I want to go without checking the nuts, bolts etc. in question. Mostly I like to undo them partially just to crack the seal of rust or grime that will later require some serious heat to break. The other nuts, bolts etc. require complete removal to clean them and the thread of all the rust/muck. If you've got a Land Rover in better condition than mine (quite likely actually!) then this may not fit in with your schedule and a more permanent approach will be required. I generally find that road conditions and mileage cause me to want to adjust just about everything after a while, the rest is riveted (by the manufacturer) and I hope I never have to adjust it! All nuts, bolts etc. on the inside are covered in paint which is elastic enough to resist vibration. My vehicle is bare inside at the moment so maybe I've got less to worry about with a simple 90 hardtop than most. I suspect that when I've finished fixing up the wee beastie I will have to look at a more permanent fix for vibration, for now I seem to be taking everything off and cleaning it . . . anyone use a longer lasting fix for this washboard effect? Does anyone know if superglue is affected by leaking oil at all? Suddenly I'm starting to worry . . . Andy. > -----Original Message----- > From: twakeman@scruznet.com [SMTP:twakeman@scruznet.com] > Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 1997 2:19 PM > To: lro@playground.sun.com > Subject: RE: Washboard caused damage [ truncated by list-digester (was 31 lines)] > "The box said 'Requires Windows 95, or better.' So I bought a > Macintosh." ------------------------------[ <- Message 15 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 971105 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Richard Marsden"<rmarsden@digicon-egr.co.uk> Date: Tue, 4 Nov 1997 14:55:27 +0000 Subject: Re: Washboard damage/Threadlockers >There are several types for different applications, I forget their numbers, >but here it is in general: >Red- viscous liquid applied to threads prior to assembly; very strong hold >Green- thin liquid which can be applied to previously assembled parts; >removeable without extra force (personally, I'm not a big fan of applying threadlocker after the >fact) >Blue- standard threadlocker which is applied before assembly; removeable >without extra force Ah! That explains a lot. I seem to use the blue (although I do have some red but I don't remember it being that viscous - possibly different sutff?) which does tend to come undone quite easily. I don't think I've had any blue-fastened stuff which have rattled loose. >No connections, standard disclaimers, etc... oh yeah, none of them work on >paper or skin lacerations ;-). Damm! That's where I've been going wrong! :-) Richard (ex-Gurkha SIII 109 FwR with blue bits & lots of orange gasket stuff) ------------------------------[ <- Message 16 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 971105 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: DEFENDER@ibm.net Date: Tue, 04 Nov 1997 09:53:44 -0500 Subject: [Fwd: TELLICO and Charlotte club] [digester: Removing section of: Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------5D7EBB5B8AA2F50B02A33B27" ] --------------5D7EBB5B8AA2F50B02A33B27 [digester: Removing section of: Content-Type: message/rfc822 ] Two questions: 1: I am curious how many of you live in the Charlotte area. I am working on forming a club here, North Carolina, and am trying to decide how much interaction I can expect. 2: Are any of you going to be going to Tellico on Thanksgiving? Please direct mail me if you are interested. William Pittman 1997 D90 WAGON --------------5D7EBB5B8AA2F50B02A33B27-- ------------------------------[ <- Message 17 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 971105 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Andy Phillips <AnPi@norsk-data.co.uk> Subject: RE: Washboard caused damage Date: Tue, 4 Nov 1997 14:53:30 -0000 I care!!! People begin to suspect you've had an accident with the superglue after the second night of seeing you leaning against the landrover pretending to be waiting for someone outside your own house. That and only ever waving to them with one hand . . . Andy. > -----Original Message----- > From: Richard Marsden [SMTP:rmarsden@digicon-egr.co.uk] > Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 1997 2:29 PM > To: lro@playground.sun.com > Subject: RE: Washboard caused damage [ truncated by list-digester (was 74 lines)] > "The box said 'Requires Windows 95, or better.' So I bought a > Macintosh." ------------------------------[ <- Message 18 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 971105 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Richard Marsden"<rmarsden@digicon-egr.co.uk> Date: Tue, 4 Nov 1997 15:04:08 +0000 Subject: RE: Washboard caused damage Ah, but that is what paint is for - an "escape hatch"! Hey, that's an idea! NATO green would look excellant with hand "holes" going through to the underlying Bronze Green, or Black Primer! :-) Richard (ex-Gurkha SIII 109 FwithR in var. cracked shades of NATO Green) AnPi@norsk-data.co.uk on 11/04/97 02:53:30 PM Please respond to lro@playground.sun.com cc: (bcc: Richard Marsden/EAME/VDGC) Subject: RE: Washboard caused damage I care!!! People begin to suspect you've had an accident with the superglue after the second night of seeing you leaning against the landrover pretending to be waiting for someone outside your own house. That and only ever waving to them with one hand . . . Andy. > -----Original Message----- > From: Richard Marsden [SMTP:rmarsden@digicon-egr.co.uk] [ truncated by lro-lite (was 74 lines)] > "The box said 'Requires Windows 95, or better.' So I bought a > Macintosh." ------------------------------[ <- Message 19 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 971105 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Richard Marsden"<rmarsden@digicon-egr.co.uk> Date: Tue, 4 Nov 1997 15:12:10 +0000 Subject: Active Volume Controls Well, I've had the radio fitted for about 2 days, and the inevitable battle between the truck and the radio is occurring. I can set the volume for "cruising" but then its far too loud for lights and junctions. There are the obvious solutions like a.) a decent radio [rather than a 2nd hand one]; and b.) a sound proofing kit. But, I have a feeling these will only be partial solutions. Anyone tried anything like active volume controls (I've seen it in a Vauxhall poshmobile, but it was more annoying than anything else); or even "anti sound" systems (eg. like Andy Green's helmet in ThrustSSC; or in Arthur C. Clarke's "Tales from the White Hart"). The latter strikes me as having some serious flaws, though. Richard (ex-Gurkha SIII 109 FwithR) ------------------------------[ <- Message 20 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 971105 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: DEFENDER@ibm.net Date: Tue, 04 Nov 1997 10:18:47 -0500 Subject: Re: Active Volume Controls I have dealt with this problem for years, in Jeeps. I just dealt with it. I do, however, know of some stereo guys that put in active controls and they liked them pretty well. On guy had his stereo hooked up to his cell phone as well as sound sensors. The volume would raise and lower based on his settings or when his cell phone rang. Pretty cool. ------------------------------[ <- Message 21 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 971105 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: SPYDERS <SPYDERS@aol.com> Date: Tue, 4 Nov 1997 10:23:16 EST Subject: Re: RE: Washboard caused damage In a message dated 11/4/97 9:52:22 AM, AnPi wrote: >Why did I quote superglue as a good product? I find that a year is >probably the most I want to go without checking the nuts, bolts etc. in >question. Mostly I like to undo them partially just to crack the seal of >rust or grime that will later require some serious heat to break. The >other nuts, bolts etc. require complete removal to clean them and the >thread of all the rust/muck. >If you've got a Land Rover in better >condition than mine (quite likely actually!) then this may not fit in >with your schedule and a more permanent approach will be required. I >generally find that road conditions and mileage cause me to want to >adjust just about everything after a while Even if you feel the need to undo and loosen and clean the nuts and bolts of your 90 before the year's up, a threadlocker will do more to protect them than superglue, the threadlocker actually being present within the threads. It creates an air-free environment within the threads (as we all know, there *isn't* a 100% interference between the nut and the bolt, allowing water, air and road salt to migrate within the threads). That anaerobic environment helps in preventing rust, corrosion, muck etc., from working its way into the threads; an added benefit to holding the fastener at the proper torque setting. If you are concerned with muck on exposed threads, use shorter bolts where possible. The threads that hang off a bolt don't contribute to the holding power, they just add weight (and grow muck). pat. 93 110 FWIW, Loosening and re-tightening bolts can be a bad thing where: there are gaskets that get "crushed" once and when pressure is lost, they have to be replaced; where bolts are designed to stretch to hold the proper torque; where ny-lock nuts are used (toss them out too)... (and if one doesn't have an accurate torque wrench to re-tighten). One would just end up buying a lot of seals, gaskets and ny-locks. ------------------------------[ <- Message 22 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 971105 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: SPYDERS <SPYDERS@aol.com> Date: Tue, 4 Nov 1997 10:48:27 EST Subject: Re: Active Volume Controls (*not* a suggestion) I'm thinking of a "Proximity/Orientation-Velocity-Enhancing- Receiver/Transmitter-Yeller Radio" unit. Also known as P.O.V.E.R.T.Y. Radio, it would require the user to (super)glue two metal transmitters to each ear, they would tell the radio unit which way the drivers head was turned and how near it is in relation to the speakers. The radio would recieve and respond to signals beamed out by the radioactive beacons and adjust the balance so each ear would recieve the same quantity of sound. The radio's super-speed- detector would monitor the central diff to judge speed and vary the volume accordingly, and if it is locked, realize that you are probably off-road and start making elephant and hyena noises intermittently. (If it detects massive amounts of wheel-spin, it will assume you are in the Camel Trophy and blare words of encouragement like "mash the throttle, the greek team's on our b*tt..." or "more mud for the cameras, we need to make this look difficult..." as well as the (whispered) "hey navigator, is this whole thing necessary?!") Of course, who could live without the cell phone hookup, which would *raise* the volume of wind coming through the window and the noise from the transfer case so that you can hang up with the real reason of not hearing anything. Also built in to the unit would be an interior radar range & mass detection unit that would automatically know when a mother in law was in the vehicle, in which seat too, and automatically feed white noise to that area periodically interrupted by "yes, of course I love your daughter..." and "feel free to pop in anytime, mum..." The benefit of the These days, it can be so hard to find the volume control on the space station radios fitted to cars... ;-) pat 93 not-Fitted-yet 110 ------------------------------[ <- Message 23 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 971105 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Richard Marsden"<rmarsden@digicon-egr.co.uk> Date: Tue, 4 Nov 1997 16:03:27 +0000 Subject: Re: Active Volume Controls (*not* a suggestion) :-) Have a 109" would mean I could have a simple system - no need to check the centre diff for speed! I think a lot of my problem is the lack of sound-proofing, and the crappy volume control on the radio I've got - a tiny little slider thingy. The poxy speakers (ex-Fiesta prototype) were glued in with epoxy :-) And the radio shelf is covered in "Buffalo" Hide... The *only* other thing I need, is to find my tape of "Ride of the Valkyries"... :-) No one's come up with a PC name for the radiator muff yet... Richard (ex-Gurkha SIII 109 FFR) SPYDERS@aol.com on 11/04/97 03:48:27 PM Please respond to lro@playground.sun.com cc: (bcc: Richard Marsden/EAME/VDGC) Subject: Re: Active Volume Controls (*not* a suggestion) I'm thinking of a "Proximity/Orientation-Velocity-Enhancing- Receiver/Transmitter-Yeller Radio" unit. Also known as P.O.V.E.R.T.Y. Radio, it would require the user to (super)glue two metal transmitters to each ear, they would tell the radio unit which way the drivers head was turned and how near it is in relation to the speakers. The radio would recieve and respond to signals beamed out by the radioactive beacons and adjust the balance so each ear would recieve the same quantity of sound. The radio's super-speed- detector would monitor the central diff to judge speed and vary the volume accordingly, and if it is locked, realize that you are probably off-road and start making elephant and hyena noises intermittently. (If it detects massive amounts of wheel-spin, it will assume you are in the Camel Trophy and blare words of encouragement like "mash the throttle, the greek team's on our b*tt..." or "more mud for the cameras, we need to make this look difficult..." as well as the (whispered) "hey navigator, is this whole thing necessary?!") Of course, who could live without the cell phone hookup, which would *raise* the volume of wind coming through the window and the noise from the transfer case so that you can hang up with the real reason of not hearing anything. Also built in to the unit would be an interior radar range & mass detection unit that would automatically know when a mother in law was in the vehicle, in which seat too, and automatically feed white noise to that area periodically interrupted by "yes, of course I love your daughter..." and "feel free to pop in anytime, mum..." The benefit of the These days, it can be so hard to find the volume control on the space station radios fitted to cars... ;-) pat 93 not-Fitted-yet 110 ------------------------------[ <- Message 24 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 971105 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: dbobeck@inetgate.ushmm.org Date: Tue, 04 Nov 97 11:16:23 EST Subject: Re[2]: Active Volume Controls (*not* a suggestion) >>No one's come up with a PC name for the radiator muff yet... no one wants to. We all LIKE using the word muff. 'muff said oops that was a typo... 'nuff said :) later DaveB. ------------------------------[ <- Message 25 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 971105 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Bob Watson <bobw@microsoft.com> Subject: RE: Car Wash Engine Problem Date: Tue, 4 Nov 1997 09:04:16 -0800 A couple of points: 1) what most likely happened is you got water in/on your distributor (or whatever that thing in the back of the engine that replaces the distributor is called) and were experiencing mis-fires. What I do with my Disco when washing the engine is to wash it first and let it dry (by washing the rest of the car) before trying to start it. If you can't wait, try wiping the HT leads and the distributor (or whatever) with a towel before starting the motor. Also as another poster suggested, make sure you didn't blow any connectors loose or apart while washing. 2) to keep from getting ribbed about washing your car, (god forbid should you ask a question about your air conditioning, sun roof or CD changer! :-) you might try the land rover e-mail listserv that caters to the later models a.k.a. "coil sprung" rovers by: SUBSCRIBE send a message to: MajorDomo@Land-Rover.Team.Net with the text: subscribe cso-digest and optionally UNSUBSCRIBE send a message to: MajorDomo@Land-Rover.Team.Net with the text: unsubscribe lro-digest Happy trails! -- Bob W. '95 Disco > -----Original Message----- > From: RINGO JACK <RINGOJACK@aol.com> > Date: Mon, 3 Nov 1997 17:52:11 EST > Subject: Car Wash Engine Problem > I own a 96 Disco and have experienced engine trouble after a self done > car > wash. I sprayed the engine off lightly with one of those high [ truncated by list-digester (was 30 lines)] > Mark Roby > A concerned rover owner ------------------------------[ <- Message 26 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 971105 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 1997 12:09:47 -0500 (EST) From: David Scheidt <david@math.earlham.edu> Subject: Radiator muffs Richard Mardsen asks about pc terms for rad muffs. What is the objection to cardboard box? In other news, I decided to stop putting off the tune up of my Siia. Needing a new set of spark plugs, I took out the number one plug to see what was there, closed the bonnet, and drove to the auto parts store. Having obtained replacement plugs, I drove home. On opening the bonnet, I relized that i had in fact just driven there and back with only three cylinders... I think I need to sleep more. David -------- David_Scheidt@math.earlham.edu yip yip yip yap yap yak yap yip *BANG* -- no terrier ------------------------------[ <- Message 27 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 971105 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Tue, 04 Nov 1997 18:12:54 From: Paul Wakefield <pwakefie@mail.esrin.esa.it> Subject: Railco and ramblings Hello all, Just thought I'd wade in with a few ramblings. I enjoyed the trailer page http://members.aol.com/cglaves/trailer/want.html immensely, but did feel a bit of an anorak ! robot1@juno.com (Mark Hardig) wrote )Subject: Railco bushes )Anyone out there know of what material Railco bushings are made? Also, is )it possible to replace them with bearings, or is this a needed wear item? )Mark Hardig I am also curious about the railco bush. I assume it is some form of nylon, but how resistant to damage is this item. I know the military enjoy testing LR's to destruction on their tank proving grounds, but I would naturally assume these bushes would explode, say after a good (few feet) jump and contact with the ground. Admittedly they were the 'replacement' for the timken-style bearing, but is it as reliable ? again I would surmise that the needle rollers could be pushed into the carrier given sufficient force, but would still function if needed to get out of the bush. (no pun intended) So, are these bushes a potential weakness on the front axle ? Is there a better aftermarket replacement e.g. from polybush. Richard asks )So, what is the politically correct name for a radiator muff? )Anyone out there know of what material Railco bushings are made? Also, is Radiator cowl ! (sorry, couldn't think of a witty pun here) Cheers, Paul. ------------------------------[ <- Message 28 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 971105 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Paul Quin <Paul_Quin@pml.com> Subject: Out in the rain. Date: Tue, 4 Nov 1997 10:23:53 -0800 >-----Original Message----- >From: Russ Wilson [SMTP:rwilson@usaor.net] > Paul wrote: >Last night with the help of two friends, I took the roof of >the Rover >>and pushed it into the garage. The BMW now sits out in the rain :-) [ truncated by list-digester (was 17 lines)] >for any Land Rover products that I've seen. (but I still love them:-) >Paul. ------------------------------[ <- Message 29 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 971105 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Paul Quin <Paul_Quin@pml.com> Subject: FW: Out in the rain. (2nd attempt) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 1997 10:31:24 -0800 Sometimes, the Major's auto-truncate function is REALLY annoying... What I was trying to say was: Paul wrote: >Last night with the help of two friends, I took the roof of the Rover >and pushed it into the garage. The BMW now sits out in the rain :-) Russ says: Good man!! That's were the Beemer belongs I agree. After 14 years of daily driving in a very wet climate, 220,000 + kms, the BMW has no signs of rust what so ever. Anywhere. Can't say that for any Land Rover products that I've seen. (but I still love them:-) Paul. >-----Original Message----- >From: Paul Quin >Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 1997 10:24 AM >To: lro@playground.sun.com >Subject: Out in the rain. [ truncated by list-digester (was 16 lines)] >>for any Land Rover products that I've seen. (but I still love them:-) >>Paul. ------------------------------[ <- Message 30 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 971105 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: 4 Nov 1997 14:30:42 -0400 From: "LT J Jackson" <lt_j_jackson@unixlink.uscga.edu> Subject: Repair Manuals A fellow at a gas station noticed my SIII last night, walked over and gave me a catalog for Portrayal Press. (Actually, he noticed me dragging the fuel hose through the passenger door, cross-car, to get at the aux tank, which no doubt looked like I was putting the final ingredient into my fertilizer bomb before heading off to trim the federal payroll). Portrayal is a niche marketer (er, an extreme niche marketer) which specializes in repair manuals for your Sherman battle tanks and exploded parts diagrams for your WWII-vintage M13B cart, hand, wheeled (one each). BUT - they also carry some land rover stuff. They advertise full factory repair manuals for SII, IIA and III (900 pages) for 99 dollars. This seems to be considerably less than the RN price for the big manuals (shock, disbelief). Portrayals web site is www.portrayal.com. Not much there, but the catalog order number is 973-579-5781. No connections, etc., just passing the word. Jeff Jackson 73 SIII 88 (Camilla) Waterford, CT ------------------------------[ <- Message 31 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 971105 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Tue, 04 Nov 1997 13:22:55 -0700 From: Rick Grant <rgrant@cadvision.com> Subject: Removing exhaust fittings --thanks Thanks for all the suggestions on removing the exhaust pipe fittings on my Sll. Got them all off with the help of a propane torch, hammer and wrench, lots of swearing and four hours of Land Rover yoga exercises. Rick Grant 1959, SII "VORIZO" rgrant@cadvision.com www.cadvision.com/rgrant Cobra Media Communications. Calgary, Canada Aboriginal and International Relief Issues ------------------------------[ <- Message 32 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 971105 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 1997 09:51:03 +1300 (NZDT) From: Graham Furniss <graham@forum8.co.nz> Subject: Re: Railco and ramblings Hi all, >robot1@juno.com (Mark Hardig) wrote >)Subject: Railco bushes >)Anyone out there know of what material Railco bushings are made? Also, is > [ truncated by lro-lite (was 6 lines)] >)it possible to replace them with bearings, or is this a needed wear item? >)Mark Hardig >I am also curious about the railco bush. I assume it is some form of nylon, [ truncated by list-digester (was 13 lines)] >assume these bushes would explode, say after a good (few feet) jump and >contact with the ground. Never seen it. >Admittedly they were the 'replacement' for the timken-style bearing, but is >it as reliable ? again I would surmise that the needle rollers could be >pushed into the carrier given sufficient force, but would still function if >needed to get out of the bush. (no pun intended) Very reliable. >So, are these bushes a potential weakness on the front axle ? >Is there a better aftermarket replacement e.g. from polybush. The railco bush it is in the top kingpin hole so it does not see most of the impact of a hard landing. The bush itself is a friction material rather like brake lining and is there to provide damping for the steering. This is in contrast to the coil sprung landrovers which use taper roller bearings for top and bottom and a hydraulic damper. It is not un-heared of to replace the railco bush with the same bearing as the lower one BUT you MUST fit a hydraulic damper to the steering or you get all sorts of funny vibrations :(. It can also be a bit difficult to get the bearing pre-load right with this set up. Personally, I ran railco bushes in our SI for 10 years without any problems and that vehicle was WELL used; fitted and forgotten. Plenty of hard landings in that time and passed WOF (saftey inspection) every 6 months without fail. >Richard asks >)So, what is the politically correct name for a radiator muff? >)Anyone out there know of what material Railco bushings are made? Also, is >Radiator cowl ! (sorry, couldn't think of a witty pun here) Rad Jacket? Goes with the Cable Tie perhaps? Cheers, Graham. ================================================================================ Graham Furniss graham@forum8.co.nz Senior Software Engineer/Dev & Opps Manager Ph (64)(3)365 3888 Forum 8 (NZ) Ltd. FAX (64)(3)377 9888 Christchurch New Zealand. ________________________________________________________________________________ "Hummm... Tricky!" Deep Thought in 'The Hitch Hikers Guide to the Galaxy' Douglas Adams ------------------------------[ <- Message 33 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 971105 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Eyres, Richard RP" <Eyres.Richard.RP@bhp.com.au> Subject: RE: Skid plates & rock sliders for SIII 88 Date: Wed, 5 Nov 1997 09:26:00 +1100 You wrote: I am considering designing & fabricating cost effective skid plates & rock sliders for my SIII 88 (I have checked out some prefab sources). Anyone with any experience regarding frame attachment points, etc., as I would prefer to use existing holes. I plan on taking some shots underneath . The welder I am dealing with thinks we can do the entire job (3 skid plates & 2 rock sliders) for around $ 300. No fancy metal like aluminum, just ventilated, painted steel plate for the skid plates. I am negotiating to keep the patterns too. Karen Sindir '74 SIII 88 "Red Rufy" ___ I'd be interested to hear how you get on, as skid plates and sliders are nearly at the top of my 'next to do' list As yet I've not really given any thought as to how, only that it is a good idea. My only thought on the sliders is that ideally they should be strong enough to use as hi lift jacking points. The bulkhead(firewall) to out rigger bolt suggests its self as an obvious attachment point, not sure about the other end though. Are you going to protect the tank too? TIA Richard. S3 SWB New Zealand ------------------------------[ <- Message 34 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 971105 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Tue, 04 Nov 1997 16:34:38 -0500 From: Doug Tully <dtully@ix.netcom.com> Subject: Long Distance Hauling I am intersted in buying a IIA in Colorado, but I live in New Jersey. Does anyone know a reputable and economic hauling company? Thanks -- Doug Tully dtully@ix.netcom.com ------------------------------[ <- Message 35 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 971105 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: CIrvin1258@aol.com Date: Tue, 4 Nov 1997 16:53:22 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: Washboard caused damage Usually, the first inclination when driving on a washboard road, is to drive slowly. I've found (from many years driving in the desert), that sometimes if you drive faster, usually about 30-40mph, while the bumps are still there, they aren't quite as harsh. I used to have a MGB-GT that I took on desert excursions on almost a weekly basis, and in the 4 years that I was taking it out there, I never had any problems with parts coming loose. I don't know if it was simply how tight everything was, or if it was my driving habits, or both, but I still haven't to this day, had any problems. Charles ------------------------------[ <- Message 36 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 971105 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: DEFENDER@ibm.net Date: Tue, 04 Nov 1997 17:08:17 -0500 Subject: ROAV WEB SITE? Does ROAV have a web site? If so, or if not, is there any information on the web concerning this years Mid Atlantic rally? ------------------------------[ <- Message 37 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 971105 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: tashworth@sonar.com (Tom Ashworth) Subject: frame Date: 04 Nov 1997 22:52:29 GMT Hi, I'm looking for a 1971 S III frame (used). Best, Tom Ashworth ************************************************************ The Sonar Group tel. 416-703-6800 fax. 416-703-6799 e-mail: staff@sonar.com ************************************************************ ------------------------------[ <- Message 38 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 971105 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 1997 18:04:34 -0600 (CST) From: Uncle Roger <sinasohn@ricochet.net> Subject: Re: Commuting in a Series At 10:45 AM 11/3/97 -0400, you wrote: >I just learned that due to a transfer I'll be making an 80 mile (rt) highway [...] >So, should I stick with the SIII, or start shopping for Hyundota beaterbox to >flog like one of Her Majesty's conscripts? My truck is dependable and I >think it could handle the job; it just needs the usual recurring (and Hi. My name is Roger. I'm a tree hugger, and I've commuted in a Land Rover. <gasp!> 8^) I did 35miles each way for a while a couple years back. No problems, really. Not good for the environment and all that, but I had a pretty easy route (hwy 280 from SF to Palo Alto) with little traffic (most of which was doing ~80mph.) I had a good engine, and was able to maintain 70mph for most of the way. It was fun, I sure enjoyed being in the land rover. On the downside, gas was expensive, and I didn't have a radio (or maybe I did, but just couldn't hear it?) so I did get a little weird. (You should hear my girlfriend's answering machine message -- I came up with it on the road...) Anyway, if $ (gas) are an issue, examine the cost of gas versus the cost of a cheap beater car. Also, depending on your vehicle's speed, consider also your time. Factor in your thoughts about the environment if applicable. As far as is it doable, sure. Of course, you'll have a hard time wiping the sh*t-eating grin off your face when you get to work. 8^) Uncle Roger "There is pleasure pure in being mad sinasohn@ricochet.net that none but madmen know." Roger Louis Sinasohn & Associates San Francisco, California http://www.crl.com/~sinasohn/ ------------------------------[ <- Message 39 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 971105 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 1997 18:05:04 -0600 (CST) From: Uncle Roger <sinasohn@ricochet.net> Subject: Guns and Rovers (long and irrelevant) At 07:46 PM 11/3/97 -0500, you wrote: >Gosh...I must have hit a sore spot here... I wasn't sure if I was going to respond to this, (and I'm still not sure if I'll send this or delete it) but since huge CoBOL programs take forever to compile on overloaded machines, here goes nothing... I too have been out that way a couple of times. One time I did bring my rifle (.22 bolt action marlin) but it was with the hope of sampling some of Brad Blevins' world famous rabbit stew. The other times I didn't. (And for the record, I'm an ultra-liberal tree-hugger, who loves guns; the only reason I only have two is because I'm broke.) For this outing, I agree with the sentiments of the organizers. There is no need for firearms on this run. Sure, it is a desolate area, and you may find yourself on your own, and your LR might even break down (does that ever happen? 8^). *BUT* you would not be left there. If you didn't turn up after an hour or two, the organizers, I'm sure, would start a search for any missing vehicles/people. So the need for protection is simply not there. As for carrying a firearm for protection in general, it simply doesn't make sense. Let's say your tooling along in the middle of nowhere, and you spot a vehicle sitting by the side of the road. Next to it is a guy in a lawn chair, with a shotgun across his lap. Would you stop? I don't think I would. So as a survival tool, it won't keep you alive in the long run. Now, let's say it's you sitting there, but you realize people don't stop to chat with guys holding shotguns, so you stow it in the vehicle, out of sight. Along comes a truck and two guys jump out, both holding guns. Your shotgun sure isn't gonna do you much good. Even if you're packing a .357 in a small-of-the-back holster, you're not going to be able to draw before they pull the trigger. Multiple times. What if they don't show hostility at all at first? You're all carrying concealed handguns. They're out to do you in, you're hoping they'll fix your truck (or whatever). Because they *know* they're going to draw, they'll draw faster than you *every time* because you have to react to their action. So the only way a gun will protect you is if you keep it out and ready. But then you won't get any assistance. (I doubt the good samaritan stuff applies to people carrying guns.) As for wild animals, getting inside the rover and closing the doors should take care of almost all animals. Any that are pissed off/determined enough to get into a closed Rover would only be pissed off more by any caliber bullet you're likely to carry. So, no, I'm not opposed to the idea of carrying a firearm in general, I do support the position of the desertpro thing in terms of carrying firearms, and I do think that carrying (or owning, for that matter) a firearm for self-protection is illogical. >I simply stated a fact: That area is VERY remote, you're lucky to find a call >box out there - IF there is a call box out there! That is true. However, it is completely irrelevant to the question of carrying a firearm. Uncle Roger "There is pleasure pure in being mad sinasohn@ricochet.net that none but madmen know." Roger Louis Sinasohn & Associates San Francisco, California http://www.crl.com/~sinasohn/ ------------------------------[ <- Message 40 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 971105 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Vel N." <vel@mcs.net> Subject: new exhaust Date: Tue, 4 Nov 1997 18:43:02 -0600 I'm being a bargain shopper, so my question is: Where do people buy their replacement exhaust systems from for their Series vehicles. (88"). And, how much should I expect to pay? Looking in the RN catalog, I'm guessing it's about $170+. Any other places with better prices for the same or better quality? Thanks. Vel ------------------------------[ <- Message 41 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 971105 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Tue, 04 Nov 1997 20:43:12 -0500 From: Jeff Goldman <roverboy@gis.net> Subject: Defender front ends... Does anyone know of a source for Defender style front ends (the grille, radiator panel, and wings) in the US or a reliable easy overseas source? For a conversion of a Series truck to a V8. Used is fine. Does anyone know if the Range Rover cooling systems fit the Defender radiator panel? In other words, is it possible to transfer the oil cooler radiator, the A/C condensor with fans, and cooling radiator with oil cooling tanks into the Defender style front end? For those that have dealt with hybrid conversions, does the Defender unit attach to the Range Rover chassis in the same way as in the Defender, or will I have to fabricate new mounts? Thanks... Jeff G. Boston, MA 1971 88" Series IIA Land Rover - needing frame 1990 Range Rover County - hybrid fodder (ask about parts) 1990 Eagle Talon TSi AWD - the anomaly, albeit a competently quick 4x4 1991 Range Rover Hunter - basically OME-ified ------------------------------[ <- Message 42 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 971105 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: CIrvin1258@aol.com Date: Tue, 4 Nov 1997 21:54:31 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: TeriAnn's concern Point well taken. However in my case, the Air Force has taught me well. I know all too well, the sound of bullets whizzing by (in civilian life, as well as in battlefield conditions), and it can be VERY disturbing indeed, as well as being stuck in an AC-130 that is being riddled by the same bullets! I served with the 1st Air Commando Wing from 1983-1987, and due to the nature of that units' activities, am not permitted to discuss much, but I can say that I've seen my share, and anybody that's been there long enough does walk away with the feeling that they won't be safe, unless they're carrying - it doesn't matter where they are. Only when they become familiar with places, do they ease up. It's not really delayed stress, but kind of. It's tough to explain, unless you've been there. It's kind of a combination of being required to carry for so long, that you don't feel right when you don't, coupled with the fact that you've been shot at so many times, that you "have to" carry something. In the end, I guess its simply the desire to hang around for a few more years, and being patriotic has nothing to do with it. During my trip to Nevada, I had both a shotgun, and a rifle with me, because I had planned on doing a little "plinking" when I was at Black Rock (Breedloves' web site said it was okay to target shoot there), and as it turned out, I never even took them out of my locker, I was so relaxed there! Your point is well taken though. I've seen too many yahoos at Kentucky Canyon (which is now closed) get drunk, and think that they're John Wayne, so I know what you mean. It makes us responsible people look bad. It is nice to have something there - just in case. After all, most law enforcement types generally take a dim view on people that carry baseball bats with them, when they obviously don't play the game! But, for those of you that have never held a gun in your life, do me a favor...stay clear - I like being alive! Also, for those of you planning to attend the LROA event, keep in mind - Nevada IS a class 3 firearms state, so if you do happen to see somebody off in the desert firing a machine gun, they are legal there (again, my point being that you never know what you'll find), as are grenades, silencers,destructive devices, etc. - provided that the bearer has a permit for them. I apologize to you too, TeriAnn. Charles Irvin Spectre Club member since 1983 British Airways Cargo/LAX 1959 SII 88 petrol 1962 SIIa 109 diesel ------------------------------[ <- Message 43 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 971105 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: ASFCO@worldnet.att.net Subject: Kenlowe Hot Start Date: Wed, 5 Nov 1997 03:43:19 +0000 Anyone on the list have direct experience with The Kenlowe Hot Start?? With the cold weather approaching I would be intrested in hearing about its performance and ease of installation TIA Rgds Steve Bradke 96 Discovery WA2GMC 72 S lll 88 (For Sale) 68 S lla 88 ------------------------------[ <- Message 44 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 971105 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 05 Nov 1997 22:51:54 +0900 From: Winn Bearden <wbearden@americus.net> Subject: Re: Defender front ends... Jeff Goldman wrote: > Does anyone know of a source for Defender style front ends (the grille, > radiator panel, and wings) in the US or a reliable easy overseas source? > For a conversion of a Series truck to a V8. Used is fine. > Does anyone know if the Range Rover cooling systems fit the Defender > radiator panel? In other words, is it possible to transfer the oil cooler > radiator, the A/C condensor with fans, and cooling radiator with oil [ truncated by list-digester (was 23 lines)] > 1990 Eagle Talon TSi AWD - the anomaly, albeit a competently quick 4x4 > 1991 Range Rover Hunter - basically OME-ified Jeff, My inbox got zapped a few weeks ago, but if I remember correctly, a company in the U.K. called APB Trading offers a Defender- style front clip for Series vehicles using Genuine Parts. I believe the price was 320 pounds plus shipping. email: apb@dircon.co.uk website: apb@dircon.co.uk As for Defender vs. RR chassis mounting, they are totally different. -- Winn Bearden P.O. Box 464 Americus, GA 31709 912-924-6513 (H) 912-928-4984 (CELL) ------------------------------[ <- Message 45 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 971105 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 1997 23:21:28 -0500 (EST) From: rover@pinn.net (Alexander P. Grice) Subject: Springs Nate wrote: >I may be wrong here, but I think the manual states to tighten the shackle >bolt to 60 or 65 ft-lbs.... I think they are referring to the lock nut, not the shackle plate. My advice on shackle plates came from the gurus at Rovers North. Think about it - what good are bushings if the shackle plats are drawn up tight against the sides of the springs? Might as well weld the buggers on and forget all that nuisance of replacing the bushings. cheers *---"Jeep may be famous, LAND-ROVER is Legendary"----* | A. P. (Sandy) Grice | | Rover Owners' Association of Virginia, Ltd. | | "The oldest Rover-marque club in the Americas" | | 1633 Melrose Parkway, Norfolk, VA 23508-1730 | | E-mail: rover@pinn.net Phone: 757-622-7054 (Day) | | 757-423-4898 (Evenings) FAX: 757-622-7056 | | | *---1972 Series III 88"-----1996 Discovery SE-7(m)---* ------------------------------[ <- Message 46 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 971105 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Tue, 04 Nov 1997 22:36:41 -0800 From: Jeremy Bartlett <bartlett@slip.net> Subject: Re: Broken teeth in gearbox (lt95) Doug McPherson wrote: > a) Terminal. Rebuild the box now. Don't even drive down the street. > b) Big problem. Going to need a rebuild soon, but keep driving for > now, its not going to cause any more problems. I'd say its' somewhere between a and b. If the teeth are seriously chipped/broken then you have the risk of further damage to the associated gears or worse the lodging of additional teeth into other gears or bearings. That will increase your eventual rebuild cost. cheers, Jeremy ------------------------------[ <- Message 47 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 971105 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Tue, 04 Nov 1997 23:43:24 -0500 From: Dean Meyer <Dean.Meyer@internord.net> Subject: Re: frame Tom I have one I'm willing to part with but it needs some work. $100. Dean Meyer 1964 Morris Mini Minor Traveller "Wanna see my woody?" - (Having the big snooze) 1966 Austin-Healey 3000 MK III "The moneypit from Vegas" - (Sealed in an Andy Warhol time capsule and buried in the yard) 1967 Austin-Healey Sprite MK III "The big block" - (95 BHP Swiftune Sports Tourer on the way from Longs Corner Farm!) 1974 Land Rover Series III 88" "Kinabalu" - (Where's all the bits?) Tom Ashworth wrote: > Hi, > I'm looking for a 1971 S III frame (used). > Best, > Tom Ashworth [ truncated by list-digester (was 17 lines)] > e-mail: staff@sonar.com > ************************************************************ ------------------------------[ <- Message 48 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 971105 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: philippe.carchon@rug.ac.be Date: Wed, 5 Nov 1997 09:44:50 +0100 Subject: few questions I've got a few questions for you: 1) my LW petrol 2.25 is smoking to when I'm starting, so probably those valve seals. Can these be so worn that they are destroying (the oil) my spark plugs ? (only on one cilinder). One of them is covered by oil. The car also consumes a lot of oil. What's a lot ? hmmm.... 1 liter/150 km or so... 2) I've replaced one U-joint on the front shaft 3 months ago. It's making noise again ('clung-clung') and you can move it when you touch it. Do I have to replace the whole shaft or is something else going on ? 3) since I have new tires (Billing 97) (7.50x16) I can drive faster but my Hi/Lo selector (the red one) shakes and makes an irritating noise. I know a LR isn't quit but this is really 90 % of my noises. I've fasten already a bold of the stick under the car but the problem isn't solved. Sugestions ? 4) I'm almost always running on LPG. When I change to petrol and I stop after driving, my solex starts to leak. It seems that the carb still recieves some fuel but the engin isn't consuming anymore. 5) I can go one but these were the most important... Philippe Carchon Ghent, Belgium '81 ffr lightweight. ir. Philippe Carchon Department of Applied Ecology and Environmental Biology University of Gent J. Plateaustraat 22, B-9000 Gent, Belgium Tel: ++32 9 264 37 76 / Fax:: ++32 9 264 41 99 E-mail: philippe.carchon@rug.ac.be ------------------------------[ <- Message 49 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 971105 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Davies, Scott" <sdavies@monetpost.stdavids.ncr.com> Subject: Re: Railco and ramblings Date: Wed, 05 Nov 97 08:52:00 PST >The railco bush it is in the top kingpin hole so it does not see most of the >impact of a hard landing. The bush itself is a friction material rather like >brake lining and is there to provide damping for the steering. This is in >contrast to the coil sprung landrovers which use taper roller bearings for >top and bottom and a hydraulic damper. Hmmn, my 110 has a railco bush at the top; last time I checked it had coil springs and a hydraulic steering damper:-) Scott Davies '85 110 2.5D HT ------------------------------[ <- Message 50 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 971105 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 05 Nov 1997 10:17:25 +0000 From: Duncan Phillips <dunk@ivanhoe.soc.staffs.ac.uk> Subject: Re: Kenlowe Hot Start At 03:43 AM 11/5/97 +0000, you wrote: >Anyone on the list have direct experience with The Kenlowe Hot Start?? With >the cold weather approaching I would be intrested in hearing about its >performance and ease of installation I fitted one to my 1980 SWB Petrol this summer (while it was warm weather and the unit was on special offer!!). On the performance side, I'd say it was quite good, on a frosty morning, having it plugged in for 20 mins gets the water temp (but not necessarily the block temp) up to around normal. I'm finding this particularly useful at the moment as I'm running on 3 cylinders instead of 4!! (the head's coming off at the weekend) so starting is difficult anyway. The unit is thermostatically controlled at about 85 degrees according to the docs, so there's no danger of blowing the radiator cap off. One point to be aware of though, is that you MUST have the heater controls set to hot, otherwise you'll only heat up the water in the heater, not the engine!! The installation wasn't too bad, basically it fits between the heater and the engine, replacing the hose that goes between the two. The main problems I found were where to mount the unit itself (I ended up mounting it below the radiator overflow reservoir) there are a number of plates supplied to fabricate brackets with. Other than that there were the pipe/cable runs: the pipe runs should be gentle downwards paths with no kinks or coils, etc. I made one mistake in that I THOUGHT I'd kept the power cable away from the exhaust manifold - NOT!!. Fortunately it's armoured heat resistant cable (it must be a common occurance) so only a bit of the outer sheathing melted!! Hope this helps I conclusion I'm glad I bought it!! ******************************* Duncan Phillips 1980 SWB SIII 'Evie' http://Gawain.soc.staffs.ac.uk/~cmtdmp/play/lrover/ ******************************* ------------------------------[ <- Message 51 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 971105 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 1997 06:31:52 -0500 (EST) From: David Scheidt <david@math.earlham.edu> Subject: Re: Kenlowe Hot Start I have something like this fitted to my SIIA. Unfortunatly, I cannot use it regularly, as I lack somewhere to put power lead. As the thing lives outside, I was wondering if anyone had any experiance with something not run by AC current. Like, a propane fired heater, or a 12VDC thing (which would of course require a second battery and split charge)? David -------- David_Scheidt@math.earlham.edu yip yip yip yap yap yak yap yip *BANG* -- no terrier ------------------------------[ <- Message 52 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 971105 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 1997 00:52:39 +1300 (NZDT) From: Graham Furniss <graham@forum8.co.nz> Subject: Re: Railco and ramblings >>The railco bush it is in the top kingpin hole so it does not see most of >the >>impact of a hard landing. The bush itself is a friction material rather >like >>brake lining and is there to provide damping for the steering. This is in >>contrast to the coil sprung landrovers which use taper roller bearings for >>top and bottom and a hydraulic damper. >Hmmn, my 110 has a railco bush at the top; last time I checked it had coil >springs and a hydraulic steering damper:-) Scott, I sit corrected :). I have not been inside many coiler front axles ( I own a '72 Range Rover ) and since so much of the coiler stuff is the same across the different models, I ass-umed the king pins were the same ;) . I didn't say the presence of railco bushes precluded a hydraulic damper, only that the absence required one, which I have been told it does (by someone who tried to do without). Cheers, Graham. ================================================================================ Graham Furniss graham@forum8.co.nz Senior Software Engineer/Dev & Opps Manager Ph (64)(3)365 3888 Forum 8 (NZ) Ltd. FAX (64)(3)377 9888 Christchurch New Zealand. ________________________________________________________________________________ "Hummm... Tricky!" Deep Thought in 'The Hitch Hikers Guide to the Galaxy' Douglas Adams ------------------------------[ <- Message 53 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 971105 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
END OF * LIST DIGEST Input: messages 52 lines 2605 [forwarded 347 whitespace 727] Output: lines 1960 [content 1123 forwarded 187 (cut 160) whitespace 639][ First Message | Table of Contents | <- Digest 971105 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Back | Forward | |
---|---|---|
Photos & text Copyright 1990-2011 Bill Caloccia, All rights reserved. Digest Messages Copyright 1990-2011 by the original poster or/and Bill Caloccia, All rights reserved.
|