[ First Message Last | Table of Contents | <- Digest -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
msg | Sender | lines | Subject |
1 | Peter Kutschera [peter@z | 45 | Gearbox desaster in the Alps |
2 | WJMcD@aol.com | 22 | And Whilst We're on the Subject... |
3 | Franz Parzefall [franz@m | 21 | Re: Gearbox desaster in the Alps |
4 | Franz Parzefall [franz@m | 9 | Re: Gearbox desaster in the Alps |
5 | SPYDERS@aol.com | 23 | Re: Heated Front Windscreens |
6 | "Hatcher,KD,NAT31,HATCHE | 46 | SIII 2.25 Petrol - Help with water pump vomiting |
7 | "T. Stevenson" [gbfv08@u | 24 | Re: Front Salisbury's and Rear Steps |
8 | marsden@digicon-egr.co.u | 28 | Re: SIII 2.25 Petrol - Help with water pump vomiting |
9 | marsden@digicon-egr.co.u | 28 | Re: Front Salisbury's and Rear Steps |
10 | Michel Bertrand [mbertra | 30 | Re: PTO Winch & Overdrive |
11 | marsden@digicon-egr.co.u | 15 | Re: Front Salisbury's and Rear Steps |
12 | "LT J Jackson" [lt_j_jac | 19 | Wading Into the Plug Issue |
13 | ericz@cloud9.net | 22 | Re: Car Transport |
14 | johnsonm@borg.com (myk) | 21 | Re: Charging problems!! |
15 | NADdMD@aol.com | 37 | Re: Charging problems!! |
16 | Land_Rovers@learnlink.em | 16 | Re: Market value of used winches |
17 | nobile@up.spin.it | 11 | ATF |
18 | Geir Aarnes [geira@namda | 6 | [not specified] |
19 | Simon Ward-Hastelow [sim | 27 | [not specified] |
20 | Clayton Kirkwood [kirkwo | 13 | bfg tires |
21 | "William L. Leacock" [wl | 15 | [not specified] |
22 | SPYDERS@aol.com | 27 | Re: bfg tires |
23 | cmw@tiac.net (cmw) | 28 | Sighting -Boston |
24 | Jeremy Bartlett [bartlet | 29 | Re: bfg tires |
25 | Jeremy Bartlett [bartlet | 21 | Aluminum PSP (PAP) Trivia (Camel Trophy) |
26 | David L Glaser [dlglaser | 16 | Re: bfg tires |
27 | fhyap@ix.netcom.com (Fra | 28 | Re: bfg tires |
28 | Ben Mitchell [benha@data | 24 | Re: Aluminum PSP (PAP) Trivia (Camel Trophy) |
29 | Benjamin Allan Smith (Pe | 20 | [not specified] |
30 | rover@pinn.net (Alexande | 29 | Filters |
31 | Hudson29@aol.com | 44 | Year of Manu. L. Plates, Cal. |
32 | "Tom Walsh" [tomw@best.c | 27 | Re: Aluminum PSP (PAP) Trivia (Camel Trophy) |
33 | Benjamin Allan Smith (Pe | 27 | [not specified] |
34 | Solihull@aol.com | 18 | Re: Filters |
35 | Solihull@aol.com | 20 | Re: PTO Winch & Overdrive |
36 | CIrvin1258@aol.com | 40 | Re: Year of Manu. L. Plates, Cal. |
37 | "FHYap" [FHYap@ix.netcom | 11 | Re: bfg tires |
38 | "FHYap" [FHYap@ix.netcom | 17 | Re: Year of Manu. L. Plates, Cal. |
39 | David L Glaser [dlglaser | 15 | Re: bfg tires |
40 | David L Glaser [dlglaser | 25 | Re: Conversion/hybrid question |
41 | "JAMES PAPPAS" [roverhea | 16 | address change |
42 | Matthew Loxton [matthewl | 29 | Trip to Tanzania, any comments? |
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 1997 13:56:31 +0200 From: Peter Kutschera <peter@zditf2.arcs.ac.at> Subject: Gearbox desaster in the Alps Hello to all out there! I spent a week with my family and our LR (SIIA 109 SW Diesel) in the Alps When driving uphill in 2nd high the gearbox decided to emulate a coffee grinder. A quick test resulted in: 2nd emulates coffee grinder 3rd emulates coffee grinder 1st emulates idle reverse emulates idle 4th works ! Fine! So it wasn't necessary to roll down about 2km from the hill to our lodging without engine braking. 4rd low was fine. The evening saw me 'fishing' with a magnet in the gearbox. There I found one part of this split ring holding the gearwheels (2nd, 3rd) on the layshaft in the correct position. Any (cheap) ideas why 1st and reverse don't work???? Let me know. After finding out the price for being towed home I did it myself with 4rd only. I used 4rd low to drive away and switched at about 20 km/h to high (I have free wheel hubs, so it wasn't necessary to remove the front probshaft). I never realized that I can use 4rd from 20 to 100km/h (ok, 85 most times). Only up the Semmering needed 4rd low. I needed 4 hours for 330 km. Most was highway but there where some parts where it wasn't possible to overtake (e.g. up the Semmering). Sorry if you where behind me. The next weekends well see me stripping the gearbox. Anyone with a working but unneeded SII gearbox around vienna? Happy rovering Peter -- Signature: Cogito ergo sum....I think.... Homepage: http://zditr1.arcs.ac.at/~peter Landrover: http://zditr1.arcs.ac.at/~peter/LR ------------------------------[ <- Message 2 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970403 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: WJMcD@aol.com Date: Wed, 2 Apr 1997 07:11:44 -0500 (EST) Subject: And Whilst We're on the Subject... Now that I've decided to violate my all original landie with a GM motor, I'll have a 2.6 for sale in parts or whole. Anyone interested? As I no longer have a boat to anchor, I have no use for it. Lord knows it has value. I've spent the last 3 months looking for a 2.6 and pricing parts. Again, for those who haven't been keeping up. It's a euro six with a cracked case, chipped crank and broken rod in cylinder six. Any takers? Bill McDonald 301.277.4321 '69 109" Safari- "Beauty" soon to be defiled by the "Beast" '66 MGB- Mom and Dad's Blue Car '93 VW Eurovan- "Box o' Kids" '96 VW Passat VR6- "Mom's Car that Dad had to Buy Because He Bough the Stupid Land Rover with the Bad Motor and Mom Refuses to Drive the Eurovan" ' ------------------------------[ <- Message 3 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970403 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Franz Parzefall <franz@max.physiol.med.tu-muenchen.de> Subject: Re: Gearbox desaster in the Alps Date: Wed, 2 Apr 1997 14:15:25 +0200 (MET DST) hallo peter, | When driving uphill in 2nd high the gearbox decided to emulate a coffee | grinder. A quick test resulted in: [ truncated by list-digester (was 7 lines)] | reverse emulates idle | 4th works ! oh! sch...! klingt ja nicht fein. viel spass beim zerlegen. du hast die zahnradkiste doch erst gemacht oder? leider keine konstruktiven ratschl"age. servus, franz Franz Parzefall franz@physiol.med.tu-muenchen.de http://www.physiol.med.tu-muenchen.de/~franz ------------------------------[ <- Message 4 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970403 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Franz Parzefall <franz@max.physiol.med.tu-muenchen.de> Subject: Re: Gearbox desaster in the Alps Date: Wed, 2 Apr 1997 14:20:21 +0200 (MET DST) Oups! Sorry, the Germany message was intended to go to Peter directly. Franz Parzefall franz@physiol.med.tu-muenchen.de http://www.physiol.med.tu-muenchen.de/~franz ------------------------------[ <- Message 5 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970403 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: SPYDERS@aol.com Date: Wed, 2 Apr 1997 07:26:02 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: Heated Front Windscreens In a message dated 4/2/97 3:42:40 AM, you wrote: >So if >anyone is interested in electricaly heated front glass for his >90/110/Defender please contact me directly at 100770.1655@Compuserve.com. >They have those very fine wires like the new Discos or BMW's which are >almost invisible. OK, so the front screen has those ultra fine wires, (my 110 has the heated screen) so why don't they do the rear door glass and the small windows either side of the rear door like that? I've seen wires on the rear side glass of RRs, but was puzzled by their not being connected to leads on both sides (to finish the electrical circuit). Perhaps too many wires in glass would look & feel like a toaster oven if too much voltage was applied? pat 93 110 ------------------------------[ <- Message 6 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970403 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Hatcher,KD,NAT31,HATCHED3 M" <HATCHED3@BTLIP47.BT.CO.UK> Subject: SIII 2.25 Petrol - Help with water pump vomiting Date: Wed, 2 Apr 1997 13:43:00 -0000 Hi All, I have a curious problem with my SIII (1980) 2.25 petrol SWB. I am unable to convince it to keep the water in the cooling system. I'm sure this isn't unique and I challenge anyone out there to come up with an answer! Here's what I have done: (1) On the first overheating and discharge of water on the ground (out the water pump overflow port) I checked the thermostat - it opened around 90 Celsius so I know it is working OK and not a thermostat problem (re-assembled and re-sealed). (2) Drained the heater matrix and put a hose pipe on it to flush the whole system through for about 20 minutes. Mucho water is seen coming out of the top of the radiator where I had put a temporary pipe on. I reconnect everything up and run the system so that some heat is felt from the heater (but not much). I also left the radiator cap off whilst running it up so that any air-locks can work their way through. After doing this for another 20 minutes, I switch off ... closely followed by about 1/2 a gallon of water going on the ground again (out the water pump overflow port). (3) Presumed the pump was worn out and so replaced the water pump. On examination of the old pump with a local LR company, they said the pump insert was worn out. On replacement of the new water pump I repeated step (2). And again water keep coming out on the ground out the new pumps' overflow. Ok, now I don't want to really have to go through this all over again as it took ages to replace the pump. So, has anyone seen this "water vomiting" before? Have I missed something here? Regards to all, Darren Hatcher Work: hatched3@boat.bt.com Voice:(01473)644786 Fax:(01473)643019 ------------------------------[ <- Message 7 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970403 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 1997 13:56:04 +0100 (BST) From: "T. Stevenson" <gbfv08@udcf.gla.ac.uk> Subject: Re: Front Salisbury's and Rear Steps Richard writes: >Just phoned Paddock's up for various bits. "can I have a drain plug for a >front Salisbury". Of course, they don't exist. Doh! Don't 101s have a front Salisbury diff? They certainly have a peculiar front axle, with the swivels being an integral part of the axle casing. >Re. Rear steps. Has anyone tried fitting a rear step to a military x-member? >The potential problem is the NATO tow hitch and the NATO trailer socket. Dixon-Bate make a good rear twin step (fixed, but well enough out of the way) which will fit between the x-member and the NATO hitch. Tom ________________________________________________________________________ Thomas D.I. Stevenson gbfv08@udcf.gla.ac.uk SNL Mussel Project Tel: 01475 530581 University Marine Biological Station, Millport Fax: 01475 530601 Isle of Cumbrae, Scotland KA28 OEG http://www.gla.ac.uk/Acad/Marine ------------------------------[ <- Message 8 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970403 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: marsden@digicon-egr.co.uk (Richard Marsden) Subject: Re: SIII 2.25 Petrol - Help with water pump vomiting Date: Wed, 2 Apr 97 13:59:57 BST I've heard it said that you'd "expect the temperaure to increase a little when you switch the engine off" (by my father in fact). Not sure why, but I guess the water pump has stopped, so the water has more time to heat up. With my super-sensitive temp. gauge (temporary for a year, but accurate to 0.1 degrees celsius! I do see a small increase in temp. - a few degrees, perhaps 5 at the very most). Also, if you run the radiator without the cap on, it won't pressurise, therefore it will boil at a lower temp. than its meant to. Perhaps the cap needs replacing? Just some suggestions. It does sound odd. Richard (ex-Gurkha SIII 109 FFR) > New ! Improved ! http://www.Land-Rover.Team.Net/ [ truncated by list-digester (was 46 lines)] > Work: hatched3@boat.bt.com > Voice:(01473)644786 Fax:(01473)643019 ------------------------------[ <- Message 9 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970403 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: marsden@digicon-egr.co.uk (Richard Marsden) Subject: Re: Front Salisbury's and Rear Steps Date: Wed, 2 Apr 97 14:02:40 BST > Richard writes: > >Just phoned Paddock's up for various bits. "can I have a drain plug for a > >front Salisbury". Of course, they don't exist. Doh! > Don't 101s have a front Salisbury diff? They certainly have a > peculiar front axle, with the swivels being an integral part of the axle casing. No idea. Can't even afford a 101, let alone have room for one! :-) (but when I'm rich...) > >Re. Rear steps. Has anyone tried fitting a rear step to a military x-member? > >The potential problem is the NATO tow hitch and the NATO trailer socket. > Dixon-Bate make a good rear twin step (fixed, but well enough out of > the way) which will fit between the x-member and the NATO hitch. Does it accound for the trailer socket? Is this the one Paddocks have in their catalogue (not sure of the manufacturer)? I don't mind a fixed one, but I think a side one should perhaps be flip-down. Cheers, Richard (ex-Gurkha SIII 109 with-nearly-complete-main-gearbox) ------------------------------[ <- Message 10 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970403 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 1997 08:12:05 -0500 From: Michel Bertrand <mbertran@interlinx.qc.ca> Subject: Re: PTO Winch & Overdrive At 21:28 97-04-01 -0800, you wrote: >It's my understanding that driving a PTO winch is precisely the purpose of >a bottom PTO as it only has output forward and in more or less the position -of a more typical PTO designed for a winch. I have a parts diagram of one >around here somewhere. I've always lusted for one of those--what LRO >hasn't? Understand they're pretty nearly unobtainium. - >Granny >Redwood Valley - >Granny - I have the "Optional Equipment PArts Catalogue" dated Feb 1965 here and The bottom Power-take-off unit exits rearwards. Was there a different unit available that was exiting forward? Michel Bertrand ______ Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada, / __ / \ 1963 109 PU (Rudolph) | Lucas | 1968 109 SW (in the works) | Inside | 1973 88 SW (21st century project) \ / \______/ ------------------------------[ <- Message 11 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970403 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: marsden@digicon-egr.co.uk (Richard Marsden) Subject: Re: Front Salisbury's and Rear Steps Date: Wed, 2 Apr 97 14:37:52 BST > Richard of the Gurkha writes: > > Also, maybe need front steps, although I'm fine, but the passenger side [ truncated by list-digester (was 6 lines)] > passenger side step only when new or nearly new. It won't look odd > unless someone is using a mirror to examine both sides at once. True, I guess. Richard (ex-Gurkha SIII 109 FFR with a nearly complete 'box) ------------------------------[ <- Message 12 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970403 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: 2 Apr 1997 08:49:02 -0400 From: "LT J Jackson" <lt_j_jackson@unixlink.uscga.edu> Subject: Wading Into the Plug Issue In reference to the recent posts about the mysterious wading plug and its use, I noticed that the primary purpose was never mentioned: If you're doing pre-registration battle with the DOT/MOT/DMV types and you live in one of those states/provinces/prefectures where the inspection is a thinly disguised mechanism for removing paid-for vehicles from our roadways, the wading plug is a brilliant device for (very) temporarily hiding your rear main seal leak from the inspectors. I actually put mine in while laying on my back in the DMV parking lot, and passed the inspection (my second attempt). What caused me to fail the first attempt? "Oil leak". Jeff Jackson 73 SIII 88 ------------------------------[ <- Message 13 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970403 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: ericz@cloud9.net Date: Wed, 2 Apr 1997 09:00:27 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: Car Transport On Mon, 31 Mar 1997, johnsonm@borg.com (myk) wrote: >New ! Improved ! http://www.Land-Rover.Team.Net/ >Ben, I hear that Zippy's towing service is pretty good. And Cheap! [ truncated by list-digester (was 6 lines)] >New ! Improved ! http://www.Land-Rover.Team.Net/ >Ben, I hear that Zippy's towing service is pretty good. And Cheap! Only if you can find me a C-130 and you pay the fuel. I'll kick in the flying free! :) Rgds, _______________________________________________________________________ Eric Zipkin Bedford, NY USA * ericz@cloud9.net * www.cloud9.net/~ericz SIII 109" V8 Hardtop * SII 109" SW (since new) * '63 Triumph Spitfire SIIA 88" (project car) * '67 Mini-Moke * '94 Car Trailer: "NOT FOR HIRE" ------------------------------[ <- Message 14 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970403 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 1997 09:00:47 -0500 From: johnsonm@borg.com (myk) Subject: Re: Charging problems!! I think you hit the nail on the head... This is exactly what happened when my alt/voltage reg failed. My lights had never been so bright, and my wipers worked on low ( which they never did b4) setting. Then nothing worked, Ahh the Prince of Darkness stikes again. Mike Johnson <SNIP> >The only thing I can think of is that while at highwaymy speeds the newly [ truncated by list-digester (was 10 lines)] >becauase this is what goes to the charge warning lamp to turn it off and >on. Hence my theory that maybe the dynamo blew out!? 74 SIII 88 (Chester) 73 SIII 88 (Jezebel) everyone's gettin some http://www.borg.com/~johnsonm ------------------------------[ <- Message 15 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970403 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: NADdMD@aol.com Date: Wed, 2 Apr 1997 11:13:12 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: Charging problems!! In a message dated 97-04-02 10:43:46 EST, you write: << I think you hit the nail on the head... This is exactly what happened when my alt/voltage reg failed. My lights had never been so bright, and my wipers worked on low ( which they never did b4) setting. Then nothing worked, Ahh the Prince of Darkness stikes again. Mike Johnson <SNIP> >The only thing I can think of is that while at highwaymy speeds the newly [ truncated by lro-lite (was 10 lines)] >becauase this is what goes to the charge warning lamp to turn it off and >on. Hence my theory that maybe the dynamo blew out!? >> The other possibility is that the wiring harness to the dynamo was run in a way that allowed it to flap back against the exhaust manifold, melt and short across. I had a short in my harness there, replaced both the dynamo and VR with no change in the charge light status and finally found a small spot on the harness that looked a little misshapen. Upon dissection, I found a lot of melted insulation under the black wrap in this area, hence the short. In my case, the meltdown may have come from a bad VR allowing the dynamo to overload the circuit since I couldn't get that area to reach back to the exhaust manifold, but in theory... Good luck, Nate NADdMD@aol.com <A HREF="http://members.aol.com/naddmd/first.htm">Blue Brick Ro ver Page</A> ------------------------------[ <- Message 16 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970403 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Land_Rovers@learnlink.emory.edu (Sean P. Murphy) Date: Wed, 2 Apr 1997 12:40:09 -0500 Subject: Re: Market value of used winches trowe@cdr.wisc.edu,Internet writes: >FWIW I paid $450-500 new for my 8274 in 1974 or 5. >I supose, like most things, it's worth what the market will bear. >(ever priced '80's Star Wars toys?) I'd happily trade some 80's Star Wars toys for a winch. <GRIN> -- Sean P. Murphy - Project Director - (404)/727-2398 Voice Emory University - ITD/LearnLink - (404)/727-2282 FAX ------------------------------[ <- Message 17 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970403 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: nobile@up.spin.it Date: Wed, 2 Apr 1997 20:06:07 +0200 (METDST) Subject: ATF I am facing a problem about ATF to grade M2C 33 F for main gearbox of my 90. Here in the island of Crete (GR) they seem only have ATF to Dexron II D. Does anybody know if it is suitable to LT 77 main gearbox as for power steering? Regards Albert Nobile nobile@up.spin.it ------------------------------[ <- Message 18 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970403 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Geir Aarnes <geira@namdalsnett.no> Date: Wed, 2 Apr 1997 20:48:02 +0200 which geira@namdalsnett.no ------------------------------[ <- Message 19 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970403 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Subject: Re: Forward: News Browser: Tag Items/Land-Rover, Land Rover, So Date: Wed, 2 Apr 97 22:10:25 +0100 From: Simon Ward-Hastelow <simon.110.v8@dial.pipex.com> ><<<In a related press release, Solihull has announced plans to extend the >policy of lowering prices for their "Genuine Parts" for Series vehicles. The >pricing changes will continue to affect parts for the popular Series III >vehicles I'm not ure about the rest of this orignal posting being an April Fool Joke but this bit COULD be right. I visited my local LR franchise dealer for parts for my 110 the other day and they have a big promotion running for GENUINE Series 111 parts, the also had a price list stating '1000 reasons for buying Genuine parts' and listed 1000 parts prices for S3 bits, posters were plastered all over the place to do with the promotion and the prices did seem very competitive but that would depend on where you usually source your bits. However the Landrover policy of restricting supply of bits to non-franchise dealers could hike prices in the long run - I called four places from LROI for various bits and they all quoted EXACTLY the same price and delivery times - say goodbye to fair trade and market competition. Simon Ward-Hastelow '85 110 V8 ------------------------------[ <- Message 20 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970403 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 02 Apr 1997 12:54:59 -0800 From: Clayton Kirkwood <kirkwood@kirkwood-desk.fm.intel.com> Subject: bfg tires Hi, Sorry for the cross post and maybe it is common knowledge, but I just went surfing to the bfgoodrich page and found out that they no longer make tires. That is now handled by uniroyal goodrich tire company. Did I miss out on something???? Clayton ------------------------------[ <- Message 21 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970403 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 1997 17:09:49 -0500 (EST) From: "William L. Leacock" <wleacock@pipeline.com> From: David Place S Has anyone ever taken the centre metal piece out of the IIA window and gone with one piece of glass right across like the newer version? This mod is quite popular in the UK, usually accompanied by the addition of a third windscreen wiper to clean the middle bit. I have one here in western NY. Bill Leacock Limey in exile 89 RR; 67 - 109 and early 88. ------------------------------[ <- Message 22 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970403 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: SPYDERS@aol.com Date: Wed, 2 Apr 1997 18:21:53 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: bfg tires In a message dated 4/2/97 6:12:51 PM, you wrote: >but I just went >surfing to the bfgoodrich page and found out that they no longer make tires. >That is now handled by uniroyal goodrich tire company. Did I miss out on >something???? In the Philippines, we got "Sime Darby" tires (for passenger cars and light trucks) which are identical, in tread pattern at least, to those available here in the US. Speaking of BFG, Which tires do/did NAS D90s come with? I've seen some with chunky Mud Terrains and some (mostly 90SWs) with All Terrains. Was there an option or was it model-year-to-model-year? Are they tubed? My 110 will soon be needing new rubber and will probably be looking for the stock-from-the-factory Michelins; no real complaints from me on them. (Some non-lr poeple think they're a bit skinny (7.50x16).) Are they available in the US? Haven't really seen them around. pat 93 "on slicks" 110 ------------------------------[ <- Message 23 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970403 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 1997 18:34:10 -0500 (EST) From: cmw@tiac.net (cmw) Subject: Sighting -Boston Hello everyone. Just this last Friday I chanced upon a nice looking Limestone 88" near Boston. It was right up the block from Dali's in Sommerville (my and my GF's favorite rest., great Spanish food) Anybody I know? Just (finally) got footwells! AB has them for $45 for the pair -in stock if you hurry. Tip for the day: Remove window glass before welding any portion of a door frame! :-> Chris ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Christopher Weinbeck Office Logic, Inc. V (508) 392-0288 _______ 7 Littleton Road F (508) 692-0897 |__][_[_\__ Westford, MA 01886 Computerization for |___\_|_]__] the healthcare (o) (o) '69 109" RHD OD 2.6 Dormobile professional Ask me about East Coast Rover Co. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ------------------------------[ <- Message 24 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970403 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 02 Apr 1997 16:17:39 -0800 From: Jeremy Bartlett <bartlett@slip.net> Subject: Re: bfg tires SPYDERS@aol.com wrote: > snip > Speaking of BFG, Which tires do/did NAS D90s come with? I've seen some with > chunky Mud Terrains and some (mostly 90SWs) with All Terrains. Was there an > option or was it model-year-to-model-year? '94 Muds - '95 and on ATs > Are they tubed? No > My 110 will soon > be needing new rubber and will probably be looking for the > stock-from-the-factory Michelins; no real complaints from me on them. (Some > non-lr poeple think they're a bit skinny (7.50x16).) Are they available in > the US? Haven't really seen them around. I'm not sure what type they are so I don't know. But most tire types or a close equivalent can be found. The toughest seems to be the XCLs and related. cheers, Jeremy ------------------------------[ <- Message 25 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970403 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 02 Apr 1997 16:21:10 -0800 From: Jeremy Bartlett <bartlett@slip.net> Subject: Aluminum PSP (PAP) Trivia (Camel Trophy) I noticed in the latest LRO in one of the full page photo spreads that the Camel Trophy vehicles are no longer carrying PAP and have switched over to hefty sand ladders. I just though I'd pass that on since a while ago I was trying to track down some PAP and there was a discussion by a number of people regarding it. In my search I couldn't locate any source in either the UK or US including some of the expedition suppliers (Slavin, Mantec, etc.). Seems like the world supply has dried up. cheers, Jeremy ------------------------------[ <- Message 26 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970403 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 02 Apr 1997 19:57:06 -0500 From: David L Glaser <dlglaser@wam.umd.edu> Subject: Re: bfg tires '94 Defender 90s came with BFG Mud Terrains. '95 on, came/comes with All Terrains. Though I've seen a few early '95 which came with Mud Terrains. The All & Mud Terrains are run tubeless on aloys. But I'm pretty sure they can be installed with tubes on standard LR rims. i've seen some 110s with Mud Terains. The tyres which came standard on NAS Defender 110s were XCLs. They are hard to comeby in the US, but I think they can be special ordered. Rover On, David L Glaser '94 La Ruta Maya Discovery #6 ------------------------------[ <- Message 27 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970403 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 1997 18:59:43 -0600 (CST) From: fhyap@ix.netcom.com (Franklin H. Yap) Subject: Re: bfg tires You wrote: > My 110 will soon >be needing new rubber and will probably be looking for the >stock-from-the-factory Michelins; no real complaints from me on them. (Some >non-lr poeple think they're a bit skinny (7.50x16).) Are they available in >the US? Haven't really seen them around. >be needing new rubber and will probably be looking for the Michelin XCLs 7.50x16 are available fom Safari Gard. They were on sale earlier this year at reasonable prices. I think at least 2 people on the mendo_recce list bought them. I am not sure if they are running them tubed. (BTW, did they come with the unobtainium Michelin tubes?) They will not be suitable for on-road use. The Michelin 4x4s that came with the D110 are not available in the US and I am not sure if they are still being made. Even if they were, I would not get them as replacements. You have many readily available choices in 235/85R16 (or larger). Frank ------------------------------[ <- Message 28 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970403 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 02 Apr 1997 16:48:55 -0800 From: Ben Mitchell <benha@datatools.com> Subject: Re: Aluminum PSP (PAP) Trivia (Camel Trophy) Hmmm... As I understand things (don't keep tabs on the CT too closely) this year's CT is in a much drier climate where the traction problems are more likely to be sand. In years past, mud was the issue. Ladders don't work in mud cause they don't have enough surface area. PAP works better. So it may just be that they've chosen equipment more suitable to the anticipated conditions, rather than found the alternatives unavailable. After all, they've got all the funds and equipment they'd need to manufacture whatever they want to take along even if they can't find it ready made...so it's unlikely they went to ladders because they couldn't get a superior product... -Ben -- Ben Mitchell Voice: (415) 842-9274 DataTools, Inc. Fax: (415) 842-9162 3340 Hillview Ave. mailto:benha@datatools.com Palo Alto, Ca 94304 http://www.datatools.com ------------------------------[ <- Message 29 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970403 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Subject: Re: Aluminum PSP (PAP) Trivia (Camel Trophy) Date: Wed, 02 Apr 1997 17:02:16 -0800 From: Benjamin Allan Smith (Pencom) <Benjamin.Smith@sv.sc.philips.com> In message <199704030102.PAA27896@unix.off-road.com>you write: > is in a much drier climate where the traction problems are more likely to be > sand. In years past, mud was the issue. Ladders don't work in mud cause the > don't have enough surface area. PAP works better. So it may just be that > they've chosen equipment more suitable to the anticipated conditions, rather > than found the alternatives unavailable. Ladders also have the additional feature of being able to be used as short bridges, where as PAP and PSP have no intrinsic strength. Personally I have 2 lengths of PSP and have stopped bringing them on trips because other available materials filled that function. Ben Benjamin Allan Smith Benjamin.Smith@sv.sc.philips.com Pencom Systems Administration---> EDS/Philips 1972 Land Rover SIII 88 ------------------------------[ <- Message 30 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970403 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 1997 21:13:17 -0500 From: rover@pinn.net (Alexander P. Grice) Subject: Filters John Tackley writes with problems/questions about fuel filters. The simplest/cheapest is to replace the OEM metal filter with a generic filter that is in essence a heavy-wall glass tube. Abailable in 1/4, 5/16 and 3/8 inlet/outlet sizes, it comes with three replaceable filter inserts. Cost? About $3.98. Placed just ahead of the carb, the glass allows you to diagnose fuel delivery problems at a glance. On a related issue, I would like to replace the gauze filter on the bottom of the pickup tube in the tank. Last time I had it out, the filter had vanished: not trace of it in the tank, with the tube as clean as if it had been dipped in acid. Several trips to various auto parts stores have failed to locate a generic "sock" to fit the tube. All are purpouse-built for various other marques. Any ideas (other than making one out of bronze mesh - which didn't turn out so well)? Cheers *----"Jeep may be famous, LAND-ROVER is Legendary"----* | A. P. (Sandy) Grice | | Rover Owners' Association of Virginia, Ltd. | | 1633 Melrose Parkway, Norfolk, VA 23508-1730 | | E-mail: rover@pinn.net Phone: 757-622-7054 (Day) | | 757-423-4898 (Evenings) FAX: 757-622-7056 | | | *---1972 Series III 88"------1996 Discovery SE-7(m)---* ------------------------------[ <- Message 31 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970403 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Hudson29@aol.com Date: Wed, 2 Apr 1997 21:24:36 -0500 (EST) Subject: Year of Manu. L. Plates, Cal. One of our LRO listers e-mailed me about a problem he is having with keeping his "original" plates on a 1960 Land Rover that he had purchased as an unregistered vehicle. It had been unregistered since 1982, and the DMV's computer does not go back nearly that far. He suggested other "Left Coast" owners might have similar problems. California's greedy public sector has encouraged the DMV to take some very Draconian attitudes towards their victims. Just for example, they just doubled the non operation fee without notice, with their own paperwork still asking for the old fee. If you send them what they ask for, you will be fined! I see two problem with this case. The first is lapsed registration. My suggestion is to join the AAA. They can run interference with the DMV for you on most matters. They are knowledgeable, polite & efficient. If they can not solve your problem, get a copy of Hemmings Motor News and get a hold of one of the advertisers that specializes in these (title & registration) matters. Sometimes they can get your title registered with another state (often Alabama) and then you can transfer back into California without trouble. These are for-a-fee services. The other problem is retaining your "original" plate. By that I take you to mean the "black" plate you probably have on your car now. While that plate has been with your car for many years, it is not the original. In 1960, California issued yellow plates with black letters. In 1963, everybody was forced to get new plates. The Year of Manufacture program does NOT cover "black" '63 and later plates. I don't know how you can save your "black" plates. Once you fail to keep continuous registration, you lose them as far as I know. Perhaps someone else on the list has a suggestion. Have you considered an original set of 1960 plates? They can be found at any old car swap meet or from license plate specialists. Again, see Hemmings. Under the Year of Manufacture program, you CAN get plates on your Landie that are really authentic. They will cost you a $10. per year premium, and a certain ordeal to get them set up. AAA can not help you with this, at least not yet. I don't believe that they will need your old "black" plates, as they should be off the computer by now. Paul O'Neil '71 IIA 88 SW, (still unchristened but I have several good possibilities) Hudson29@aol.com ------------------------------[ <- Message 32 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970403 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Tom Walsh" <tomw@best.com> Date: Wed, 2 Apr 1997 18:12:40 +0000 Subject: Re: Aluminum PSP (PAP) Trivia (Camel Trophy) > In message <199704030102.PAA27896@unix.off-road.com>you write: > > is in a much drier climate where the traction problems are more likely to be [ truncated by list-digester (was 10 lines)] > Ladders also have the additional feature of being able to be > used as short bridges, where as PAP and PSP have no intrinsic strength. We sure coulda used two weeks ago! :) Tomw > Personally I have 2 lengths of PSP and have stopped bringing them on trips > because other available materials filled that function. [ truncated by list-digester (was 9 lines)] > Benjamin Allan Smith Benjamin.Smith@sv.sc.philips.com > Pencom Systems Administration---> EDS/Philips 1972 Land Rover SIII 88 ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------* Fluent Networks "Intelligent Networking Solutions" tomw@best.com 95 LR Disco "The Light Brigade" http://www.fluentnet.com *---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------* ------------------------------[ <- Message 33 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970403 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Subject: Re: Aluminum PSP (PAP) Trivia (Camel Trophy) Date: Wed, 02 Apr 1997 18:39:56 -0800 From: Benjamin Allan Smith (Pencom) <Benjamin.Smith@sv.sc.philips.com> In message <199704030233.QAA00324@unix.off-road.com>you write: > > Ladders also have the additional feature of being able to be > > used as short bridges, where as PAP and PSP have no intrinsic strength. > We sure coulda used two weeks ago! :) Yes, that was one of the few cases that I regretted not bringing the PSP. (For those not there we had a motorcycle trail that was just wide enough to get a SIII 88 through (mine) without too much trouble, but a Disco being 4 inches wider and longer proved to me much harder--as in 10+ hours. The problem was that the downhill side of the trail was too soft for a vehicle's weight and it was a long ways down hill if the Rovers slid/rolled. (Which came close a few times...) BTW, if you don't care about the weight, I've found that PSP is usually findable in scrap yards near US military bases or at base auctions. I bought mine at scrap iron prices ($0.10/lb). PSP weights about twice what PAP does and is harder to unbend. But much cheeper than the $200 that RN wants to charge for PAP. Ben Benjamin Allan Smith Benjamin.Smith@sv.sc.philips.com Pencom Systems Administration---> EDS/Philips 1972 Land Rover SIII 88 ------------------------------[ <- Message 34 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970403 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Solihull@aol.com Date: Wed, 2 Apr 1997 22:16:01 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: Filters The fuel pickup 'sock' for VW beetles is the right size for our LRs. just fold around the tube as far up as it will go and solder it on. Tie wire or a small hose clamp would work, too. I'll try to get the VW part number and report back. Cheers!! John Dillingham in Woodstock, GA KF4NAS LROA #1095 73 s3 swb 25902676b DD "Pansy" 72 s3 swb 25900502a rusted, in suspended animation Looking for a P5 project, well, OK, or a P6 or another SD1 Vintage Rover Service--Since 1994, just about a couple dozen satisfied customers!! ------------------------------[ <- Message 35 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970403 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Solihull@aol.com Date: Wed, 2 Apr 1997 22:19:27 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: PTO Winch & Overdrive >>I have the "Optional Equipment PArts Catalogue" dated Feb 1965 here... Michel, could I talk you into photocopying that and sending me a copy? Others on the list would probably be interested, as well. I would make it worth your while. Maybe you could scan it into a file? Cheers!! John Dillingham in Woodstock, GA KF4NAS LROA #1095 73 s3 swb 25902676b DD "Pansy" 72 s3 swb 25900502a rusted, in suspended animation Looking for a P5 project, well, OK, or a P6 or another SD1 Vintage Rover Service--Since 1994, just about a couple dozen satisfied customers!! ------------------------------[ <- Message 36 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970403 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: CIrvin1258@aol.com Date: Wed, 2 Apr 1997 23:00:20 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: Year of Manu. L. Plates, Cal. ...Yes you can keep your black plates in California! So long as they're clearly legible, you can keeep them for as long as you wish to. They simply tell you that you can't, because: A) They want your money, and B) The states' constabulary prefers the reflective plates, because they're easier to read at night. Any questions - go to the local DMV office, and buy yourself a copy of the "Vehicle Code" book. It costs $3.00, and has compressed forms of the vehicle code, health and safety, penal, utilities, tax, and several other codes in it as well...well worth it. (It's gotten me out of many a traffic ticket) As far as putting them on other vehicles goes, I'm not sure what the cutoff is. Last vehicle code book I read had no cutoff point for them, but this could have changed. However, if you have a '60's car, that is currently out of the system (you can call the local DMV office, and tell them "I'm looking at this car that's for sale, but it's not registered...can you check the VIN number, and tell me if it's in your system?". They may balk at you, but they're required BY LAW to help you. They don't have to tell you who it belongs to, but they have to tell you if it's in the system, if it's stolen,tickets,etc., and they don't ask your name, either), and if it's not in the system, simply buy a set of the desired plates from a reputable source, and when registering the car, use the desired plate number on the paperwork! (yes, you CAN buy license plates at swap meets, but make sure the seller guarantees that they're clear in the DMV system) Usual disclaimers apply. Charles Irvin British Airways Cargo/LAX (when I don't have a sprained foot) 1962 SIIA 109 3dr Diesel 1959 SII 88 Petrol ------------------------------[ <- Message 37 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970403 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "FHYap" <FHYap@ix.netcom.com> Subject: Re: bfg tires Date: Wed, 2 Apr 1997 20:28:28 -0800 > The tyres which came standard on NAS Defender 110s were XCLs. No. They are Michelin X 4x4. Frank ------------------------------[ <- Message 38 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970403 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "FHYap" <FHYap@ix.netcom.com> Subject: Re: Year of Manu. L. Plates, Cal. Date: Wed, 2 Apr 1997 20:20:21 -0800 > California's greedy public sector has encouraged the DMV to take some very > Draconian attitudes towards their victims. Just for example, they just > doubled the non operation fee without notice, with their own paperwork still > asking for the old fee. If you send them what they ask for, you will be > fined! When did this take place? I recently sent in a non-op. Frank ------------------------------[ <- Message 39 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970403 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Thu, 03 Apr 1997 01:35:05 -0500 From: David L Glaser <dlglaser@wam.umd.edu> Subject: Re: bfg tires > > The tyres which came standard on NAS Defender 110s were XCLs. > No. They are Michelin X 4x4. oops, sorry for the mistake. whats the difference between X & XCL? Their tread pattern looks almost identical. XCLs are used on the Camel Trophy, right? Rover On, David L Glaser '94 La Ruta Maya Discovery #6 dlglaser@wam.umd.edu '94 Discovery, Teal ------------------------------[ <- Message 40 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970403 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Thu, 03 Apr 1997 02:15:23 -0500 From: David L Glaser <dlglaser@wam.umd.edu> Subject: Re: Conversion/hybrid question If you keep the old VIN and registration which says the Rover is over 25 years you can probably get away with it. From what I've been told, the age of the drivetrain is what determines the age of the car, not the body work. There are plenty of people who import LRs with new leaf-sprung frames so you could probably get away with putting a coil frame on. Its important to have all the proper paper work. Another thing is that it comes down to luck. If the Customes offical suspects something is not "kosher" you will have very hard time getting it into the country. Rover On, David L Glaser '94 La Ruta Maya Discovery #6 dlglaser@wam.umd.edu '94 Discovery, Teal Simon Ward-Hastelow wrote: > New ! Improved ! http://www.Land-Rover.Team.Net/ > Just a quick question to USA Landrover drivers. I know its very nearly [ truncated by list-digester (was 17 lines)] > Simon Ward-Hastelow > '85 110 V8 ------------------------------[ <- Message 41 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970403 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 97 14:12:53 UT From: "JAMES PAPPAS" <roverhead@msn.com> Subject: address change To all of my friends: At least temporarily (trying to convert my phone service for local access) my email is: roverhead@msn.com thanks for all the mail sent that I never got, IDT!! Cheers jim ------------------------------[ <- Message 42 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970403 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Matthew Loxton <matthewl@dinet.co.za> Subject: Trip to Tanzania, any comments? Date: Thu, 3 Apr 1997 10:35:40 +-200 Please excuse the cross posting, but I need feedback on road conditions, = fuel stops etc. In August we plan to visit Ifakara (aprox S 7deg 30' E 32deg) and = Nachingwea. At the same time we will take in the mandatory sights, = Ngorogor crater, Serengeti, Olduvia Gorge, Kilamanjaro, Lake Victoria. The route I am thinking of is from Pretoria, cross to Botswana at Parr's = Halt, Francistown, Nata, Cross into Zambia at the Kasangula Ferry, = Lusaka, Lilongwe, up to Mbeya, Iringa, Ifakara. Then after looking at the work my Father did fifty years back on the = agricultural projects, up to Ngorogoro, Serengeti, Olduvia, Lake Vic. = Then reverse out and head east to Moshi (Kilimanjaro), down to Dar Es = Salaam, Port Lindi (see where my sister was born), Natchingwea (more = agriculture), Songea, Mbeya, and then back down to ZA maybe via Zim, or = again through Botswana. Any comments on border issues, bandits, roads, and especially fuel stops = will be appreciated. We will be going in the S-III and a Tdi Defender = 110. Maybe also a brace of Rangies, and a solitary diesel Land Cruiser. Cheers Matthew ------------------------------[ <- Message 43 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970403 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
END OF * LIST DIGEST Input: messages 42 lines 1674 [forwarded 190 whitespace 365] Output: lines 1224 [content 715 forwarded 111 (cut 79) whitespace 335][ First Message | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970403 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Back | Forward | |
---|---|---|
Photos & text Copyright 1990-2011 Bill Caloccia, All rights reserved. Digest Messages Copyright 1990-2011 by the original poster or/and Bill Caloccia, All rights reserved.
|