[ First Message Last | Table of Contents | <- Digest -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
msg | Sender | lines | Subject |
1 | Ross [fax.rescue@hunterl | 15 | Re: 1959 88" Series 2 newbie |
2 | JDolan2109@aol.com | 15 | Re: starter lube... |
3 | lroshop@idirect.com | 19 | Re: It has srrived at last! '97 Disco V8i ES Auto, What a beauty |
4 | car4doc [car4doc@concent | 23 | For sale !971 '88' |
5 | Hank_Lapa@signalcorp.com | 22 | Poly Bushings for 109s |
6 | marsden@digicon-egr.co.u | 26 | Mainshaft woes |
7 | marsden@digicon-egr.co.u | 28 | Front Salisbury's and Rear Steps |
8 | dbobeck@ushmm.org | 17 | Re: Poly Bushings for 109s |
9 | Ray Harder [ccray@showme | 21 | Re: hale-bopp and the pathfinder binoculars... |
10 | twakeman@scruznet.com (T | 25 | Re: supplier experience -P.A.Blanchard |
11 | "Paul Gussack" [pcg@tenn | 15 | Sight unseen |
12 | Thomas Spoto [tspoto@az. | 29 | Re: Parcel Post was - supplier experience -P.A.Blanchard |
13 | "John J. Tackley" [John. | 54 | Fuel filters |
14 | Hudson29@aol.com | 28 | Registering UK Plates |
15 | John Cassidy [rovah@agat | 26 | [not specified] |
16 | Dixon Kenner [dkenner@nr | 10 | Maple Syrup Rally (OVLR) |
17 | Lee Levitt [wheelman@sho | 18 | Re: |
18 | Simon Ward-Hastelow [sim | 14 | [not specified] |
19 | "Herman L. Stude" [herma | 24 | Tie Rod ends |
20 | Jeremy Bartlett [bartlet | 16 | Re: Land-Rover conquers the world |
21 | Clayton Kirkwood [kirkwo | 18 | Re: |
22 | Kevin Girling [lroshop@i | 14 | Land Rover Owner International |
23 | Dixon Kenner [dkenner@nr | 14 | Re: Land-Rover conquers the world |
24 | Simon Ward-Hastelow [sim | 21 | [not specified] |
25 | Jeremy Bartlett [bartlet | 28 | LR Market Research Questionaire |
26 | Lee Levitt [wheelman@sho | 24 | Re: |
27 | debrown@srp.gov | 59 | 109 LR |
28 | "William L. Leacock" [wl | 12 | Webber 2 barrel |
29 | NADdMD@aol.com | 14 | Re: 109 LR |
30 | SPYDERS@aol.com | 40 | Forward: News Browser: Tag Items/Land-Rover, Land Rover, Solihull, Defender/ |
31 | SPYDERS@aol.com | 40 | Forward: News Browser: Tag Items/Land-Rover, Land Rover, Solihull, Defender/ |
32 | David Cockey [dcockey@ti | 15 | Re: Front Salisbury's and Rear Steps |
33 | David Cockey [dcockey@ti | 13 | Re: Forward: News Browser: Tag Items/Land-Rover, Land Rover, Solihull, Defender/ |
34 | "Keith W. Cooper" [kwcoo | 49 | [not specified] |
35 | jouster@red.prmx.com (Jo | 17 | Re: Webber 2 barrel |
36 | jouster@red.prmx.com (Jo | 16 | Re: Charging problems!! |
37 | David L Glaser [dlglaser | 10 | Re: Forward: News Browser: Tag Items/Land-Rover, Land Rover, Solihull, Defender/ |
38 | David L Glaser [dlglaser | 13 | PTO Winch & Overdrive |
39 | David Cockey [dcockey@ti | 19 | Re: PTO Winch & Overdrive |
40 | Granville Pool [gpool@pa | 27 | Re: PTO Winch & Overdrive |
41 | David Place [dplace@mb.s | 8 | jWindow treatment |
42 | MOKE67@aol.com | 11 | RRO Digest |
43 | Don MacDonald [don@direc | 20 | Re: jWindow treatment |
44 | Alain Hoffmann [AlainHof | 21 | Heated Front Windscreens |
45 | "Davies, Scott" [sdavies | 21 | RE: jWindow treatment |
46 | "Jim Farmery" [farmer_j@ | 20 | Series III Land Rover Purchase |
47 | Andy Woodward [azw@aber. | 16 | Re: A few queries about my new SIII. |
48 | Andy Woodward [azw@aber. | 24 | A few queries about my new SIII. |
49 | "Davies, Scott" [sdavies | 28 | RE: Series III Land Rover Purchase |
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 1997 20:39:32 +1000 From: Ross <fax.rescue@hunterlink.net.au> Subject: Re: 1959 88" Series 2 newbie אופיר נאהרי wrote: > Have fun with your new toy. > I conidered a '59 lwb but I'm still busy with my s2A 88" . [ truncated by list-digester (was 15 lines)] > [ truncated by lro-lite (was 21 lines)] > > web- http://users.hunterlink.net.au/~derf/swb/index.html > > 'Castrol' and '_________' -Australian Ex-Military Land-Rovers CXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Hello, how are you. Where are you up to on your 2A SWB? RF ------------------------------[ <- Message 2 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970402 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: JDolan2109@aol.com Date: Tue, 1 Apr 1997 07:26:17 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: starter lube... Con Seitl wrote- "I use graphite, comes in a tube..." Yeah, I know about that stuff. With the pencil, you can merely "scribble" the soft graphite/lead onto the necessary surfaces. Besides, the stuff in a tube you have to buy, a pencil you can borrow... see 'ya *in* the old road... jim '61 88" w/OD, 1 Bbl weber, 16's, hubs (econobox?) "Nicky" LR....quite possibly one of the best machines yet devised! ------------------------------[ <- Message 3 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970402 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: lroshop@idirect.com Date: Tue, 1 Apr 1997 07:39:55 +0000 Subject: Re: It has srrived at last! '97 Disco V8i ES Auto, What a beauty > Subject: It has srrived at last! '97 Disco V8i ES Auto, What a beauty!!! > New ! Improved ! http://www.Land-Rover.Team.Net/ > Hi fellow Land Rover Owners [ truncated by list-digester (was 8 lines)] > Hi fellow Land Rover Owners > As you may remember I had a dud Discovery TDi ES Auto. Congratulations and enjoy it. I had a similar experience in Canada with a 95 Discovery which LR replaced with a 96 SE7. Just goes to show when things get really bad LR do look after their customers. Kevin Girling LRO SHOP (NORTH AMERICA) ------------------------------[ <- Message 4 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970402 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Tue, 01 Apr 1997 06:19:19 -0600 From: car4doc <car4doc@concentric.net> Subject: For sale !971 '88' Hi All, This was in the chicago tribune car ads. 1971 Land Rover Short Wheel Base, 44k miles 4 cylinder, 4 speed, Exrtas include: overdrive, free wheel hubs, Factory duel fuel tanks, New lead free head, clutch, zenith carb, Stainless steel exhaust, exhaust manifold, breaklines, battery, & tires. $8500.00 call Mike Cacioppo 847-432-8224 Becuse it is in my area I went to look & found it to be a clean good driving '88' with a sound frame. Paint was original. I know several people were looking for LR's eariler so I hope this helps someone. Regards Rob davis_chicago ------------------------------[ <- Message 5 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970402 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 1997 08:12:10 -0500 From: Hank_Lapa@signalcorp.com (Hank Lapa) Subject: Poly Bushings for 109s All, Something I didn't know and only found out "the hard way" -- It seems replacement galvanized frames are all made to Series III standard. This means that the bushing holes for the front end of 109-in frames are larger than for the back, something not true for older 109s. So if you order a replacement 109 frame and a set of poly bushes, be sure that you get the larger, 109-specific bushes for the front end to avoid work stoppage. My source for poly bushes does not stock the correct ones (seems a bit absurd as they sell both 109-in frames and poly bushes!!) so is getting them from the UK -- 1-3 weeks, no promises. Hank 1960 Long Station Wagon 1997 Short Station Wagon ------------------------------[ <- Message 6 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970402 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: marsden@digicon-egr.co.uk (Richard Marsden) Subject: Mainshaft woes Date: Tue, 1 Apr 97 14:20:18 BST Finally found the problem. Dave Bobeck gave some suggestions. They covered things that were okay, but got me thinking in the right direction (Dave: I have emailed you a couple of times this morning, but your mail keeps bouncing). The mainshaft was in the rear bearing properly. The bearing was seated correctly in the housing, and the housing the case. I'd also had two previous attempts at getting the bearing on properly. Oh well. Other minor problems (like leaving stray parts in the 3rd synchro (doh!) ), but I managed to make a lot of progress yesterday. Now have two large chunks, and awaiting a few minor parts. Hopefully it goes back this weekend. Two boxes of Guinness are currently sitting in the garage if someone would like to claim them in return for a bit of heavy lifting and the like. Cheers, Richard (ex-Gurkha SIII 109 FFR - motion RSN, honest!) ------------------------------[ <- Message 7 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970402 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: marsden@digicon-egr.co.uk (Richard Marsden) Subject: Front Salisbury's and Rear Steps Date: Tue, 1 Apr 97 14:30:05 BST Hi all! Going through my email, I saw one mentioning Front Salisbury's and the usual thing being only rear Salisbury's. Didn't pay any attention to it, and assumed that as mine was mil., I had Salisbury's front and back... Just phoned Paddock's up for various bits. "can I have a drain plug for a front Salisbury". Of course, they don't exist. Doh! So it wasn't just my imagination that the rear took more oil! I understood the Salisbury had a different ratio. Does this mean that my front rover diff. has a different ratio to the norm.? Re. Rear steps. Has anyone tried fitting a rear step to a military x-member? The potential problem is the NATO tow hitch and the NATO trailer socket. I use the tow-hitch. I don't use the socket yet, but would like to keep it. Any recommendations? Also, maybe need front steps, although I'm fine, but the passenger side could do with one, and it would look odd with a step on one side! Richard (ex-Gurkha SIII 109 FFR) ------------------------------[ <- Message 8 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970402 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: dbobeck@ushmm.org Date: Tue, 01 Apr 97 09:02:06 EST Subject: Re: Poly Bushings for 109s > My source for poly bushes does not stock the correct ones (seems a >bit absurd as they sell both 109-in frames and poly bushes!!) so is >getting them from the UK -- 1-3 weeks, no promises. Hank- try British Pacific, I got my polybushes from them. They're made by Old Man Emu, and I'm quite hqappy with 'em. Don't know if the have what you need though. Cheers daveB ------------------------------[ <- Message 9 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970402 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 1997 08:22:16 -0600 (CST) From: Ray Harder <ccray@showme.missouri.edu> Subject: Re: hale-bopp and the pathfinder binoculars... On Tue, 1 Apr 1997, David L Glaser wrote: > Subject: Re: hale-bopp and the pathfinder binoculars... > For those who got free binoculars from Nissan, [ truncated by list-digester (was 13 lines)] > David L Glaser '94 La Ruta Maya Discovery #6 > dlglaser@wam.umd.edu '94 Disco, Teal i saw an identical pair (without the pathfinder sticker) at the spring bass pro shop (you got to see it to believe it) for $49.00. the brand is a good one, but i can't remember... (age 50 factor) the binocs have a speed focus lever that i really like. Sincerely, Ray Harder ------------------------------[ <- Message 10 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970402 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 1997 06:52:29 -0800 From: twakeman@scruznet.com (TeriAnn Wakeman) Subject: Re: supplier experience -P.A.Blanchard At 11:11 PM 3/31/97 -0500, David Cockey wrote: > Has anyone tried checking a gearbox or axle yet? ; >Regards, >David Cockey ; No but last July I checked: exhaust manifold, 2 windscreens, a glazed door top, new snorkle kit,a new fuel tank outrigger, a tent shower, a Coverall Europe rear car tent, and a big pile of misc parts including new pedal rubber, new hub dust covers, seals, lock washers, shovel and pickaxe mounting brackets & more. I was on my way home from Billing '96 TeriAnn Wakeman For personal mail, please start subject line Santa Cruz California with TW. I belong to 4 high volume mail lists twakeman@scruznet.com and do not read a lot of threads..Thanks Medium & large format photography, 1960 Land Rover 109, 1961 Triumph TR3A ------------------------------[ <- Message 11 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970402 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 1997 07:41:03 -0800 (PST) From: "Paul Gussack" <pcg@tennis.org> Subject: Sight unseen After seeing my SIII and being cursed with a minivan from hell my father bought a new red Disco. Having instructed my mother to wave at all rover owners so as not to be dubbed a snob, she proceeds to wave enthusiasticlly at a series owner while driving to the market. He does not respond but just looks at her curiously. It was only a few short miles later that she realized she was in the Supra. Best intentions and plans laid aside. Wave on Paul G SIII SWB "Grendal" ------------------------------[ <- Message 12 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970402 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Tue, 01 Apr 1997 07:45:40 -0800 From: Thomas Spoto <tspoto@az.com> Subject: Re: Parcel Post was - supplier experience -P.A.Blanchard David Cockey wrote: > New ! Improved ! http://www.Land-Rover.Team.Net/ > TeriAnn Wakeman wrote: [ truncated by list-digester (was 14 lines)] > Only once have I had to pay duty, and then there was a $5 fee for the > post office to collect it. PA Blanchard claims parcel post loses > shipments on a regular basis, but I haven't had a problem. ....Cut.... In the past when I worked overseas I mailed packages home on a regular basis. I never paid duty (something to do with the way the laws are written and the declared value, ymmv) and always received my parcels. A tailgate for my 67 IIA cost US$30.00 to mail from Darwin, Australia to Bellingham, Washington, USA. I almost always mailed using surface rates. The parts would take a month or so but are usually already there by the time I would get back. Tom Spoto 1 x 67 IIA 88 with parts from a few foreign wrecking yards (breakers) 2 x 72 III 88's some parts procured that way Nothing like crawling under a wrecked Rover for some parts in the Northern Territories and hoping there is'nt a Brown Snake in residence. ------------------------------[ <- Message 13 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970402 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "John J. Tackley" <John.Tackley@state.va.us> Date: Tue, 1 Apr 1997 11:49:47 -5 Subject: Fuel filters Had a fuel related problem last wknd. After a 20 mile run I shut my SIII off to do a 10 min. errand. Upon restart, it ran for a few hundred feet and died when the float bowl ran dry. Seemed like classic vapour lock. So... Disconnect carb fuel inlet hose, crank, no squirt. OK Remove metal canister fuel filter mounted just ahead of carb, right over the HOT exh. manifold, crank, no squirt. OH man..... Disconnect fuel hose from fuel pump outlet, crank, no squirt. DAMN.. Disconnnect fuel inlet hose to pump, fuel flows from the line, pull pump handle a few strokes, no suction. WTF? (OK, truth time. I rebuilt the pump a few weeks ago, so I naturally figure one of the new pump valves or diaphram is bad.) So... Take out 6 screws in fuel pump and remove pump top and sediment bowl. A little rust in the bowl (which is actually good compared to a LOT of rust, which is rather normal) but diaphram and valves are OK. Next. Re-assemble fuel pump and fuel lines. Buy a gallon of Windscreen Washer Fluid, $.99.(Why? you're thinking) read on Pour out washer fluid. Buy a gallon of gas and pump it into my new spare $.99 gas container. Dispense most of the gallon into the tank, just to move some fuel in there around a bit, in case some trash / rust is blocking up the screen. Pour a little fuel into the pump outlet hose to prime, and re-connect to carb. Hand pump a few strokes. Crank. Starts immediately and has run fine ever since. No that's not exactly correct. It runs much better than it did, in fact much better than it EVER did. So here's the thing. WHY ? The only thing different is now there is no fuel filter in the fuel line. I figure some trash blocked the screen in the tank and when I disconnected the pump inlet hose, thereby releasing the vacuum in the line, the offending trash / rust fell off the screen. Or pouring in a little fuel to stir the tank did it. I would drain and clean the tank, but it's apparently aftermarket by the PO and has no drain plug. Whatever... What I would like some input about is fuel filters. Other LRO's out there, What's your experience with fuel filters on petrol Series LRs? Apparently mine ( metal canister, generic, cheap filters...and I've changed several ) were restrictive, causing a degree of fuel starvation. My SIII now runs smoother, starts easier, has less sluggish acceleration (how can I call it brisk, after all ) and I get another 10, yes I said TEN MPH ! Comments ??? *'73 Land Rover SIII-88 - "Gen. Lee"* *'81 300SD - 170k miles* "Hiway Limo" *'89 H-D FLHS - "Oink" "That'l do pig"* *'92 F-150 Flare Side "Tow-er" ------------------------------[ <- Message 14 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970402 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Hudson29@aol.com Date: Tue, 1 Apr 1997 12:27:30 -0500 (EST) Subject: Registering UK Plates Having just done battle with the Forces Of Evil (FOE) down at the Department of Motor Vehicles here in the People's Republic of California last Friday, I seriously doubt UK plates would get past their long, thin, officious noses. The program here is call "Year Of Manufacture" and is open to pre 1963 vehicles. There are a variety of little "character tests" that they put you through, requiring much added expense, new appointments, always with fresh inquisitors asking the same questions as the last person asked. Also the rules are, of course, secret, and probably arbitrary. A couple of pointers: bring your old plates to turn in, bring proof of insurance, also expect several appointments. No one there knows anything about the program, supervisors will be called and manuals will be gone through. You will be treated as a troublemaker. They will inspect your plates minutely. If they don't correspond to their interpretation of the book, your out. Only California plates will be accepted. I emerged from my ordeal with the FOE with '26, '29 & '39 plates successfully got through, and I feel a good deal more noble & virtuous (and poorer) for the experience. Paul O'Neil '71 IIA 88 SW, (still unchristened but I have several good possibilities) Hudson29@aol.com ------------------------------[ <- Message 15 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970402 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 1997 13:09:45 -0500 (EST) From: John Cassidy <rovah@agate.net> Happy April Fools! I wanted to share a prank that might work on your spouse or significant other! :-) I had a friend call my home and leave and message on my answering machine that he was calling from one of the parts suppliers I use to verify a fax order for an amount over $3,000! He said that it was their policy to verbally confirm all fax orders over $1,000... Well, money issues(and Rovers) can push my wife's buttons so to speak, and she proceeded to grill me as to how we were going to pay for this, and that we didn't have the money....It's a speech I've heard before, but not with this kind of passion! ;-) My friend came home with me from work to have lunch, so that he could witness this first hand. We all had a good laugh about it! My wife then asked what I could spend $3,000 on mail order, and I replied I could do that without opening the catalog! ;-) Cheers! John John Cassidy Bangor, Maine USA XO of the VMFA 509th COUGARS The Downeast Land Rover Club: http://www.agate.com/~rovah/ 2 Wheels: Ducati M900, Velocette Thruxton, Moto Morini 350S 4 Wheels: 1995 Discovery, 1987 Range Rover(Smedley), 1966 Series IIA(Pondoro), 1974 Series III(Swambo) ------------------------------[ <- Message 16 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970402 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 1997 13:50:51 -0500 (EST) From: Dixon Kenner <dkenner@nrn1.NRCan.gc.ca> Subject: Maple Syrup Rally (OVLR) Delayed until next weekend (Apr. 13th). Sap is not running, we got snow yesterday, still more than three feet in the woods. (trivia. Quebec produces 90% of Canadian production, 80% of world production) ------------------------------[ <- Message 17 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970402 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Tue, 01 Apr 1997 14:15:29 -0500 From: Lee Levitt <wheelman@shore.net> Subject: Re: At 01:09 PM 4/1/97 -0500, John Cassidy wrote: >Happy April Fools! I wanted to share a prank that might work on your >spouse or significant other! :-) I had a friend call my home and leave and >message on my answering machine that he was calling from one of the parts >suppliers I use to verify a fax order for an amount over $3,000! He said >that it was their policy to verbally confirm all fax orders over $1,000... I'd consider doing that but my wife might retaliate in kind...by ordering her own batch of goodies! Let's be careful out there boys. Lee ------------------------------[ <- Message 18 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970402 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Subject: Land-Rover conquers the world Date: Tue, 1 Apr 97 20:16:26 -0000 From: Simon Ward-Hastelow <simon.110.v8@dial.pipex.com> A report in today's 'London Evening Standard' newspaper states that it is now official that at least one Landrover has been sold to every country in the world since 1948 (it does not say whether its the same Landrover being sold hundreds of times) and Landrover also claims that at least 70 per cent of them (1.6million) are still around (probably in workshops awaiting restoration) These figures do not include Range Rovers or Discoverys. Simon Ward-Hastelow '85 110 V8 ------------------------------[ <- Message 19 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970402 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Tue, 01 Apr 1997 14:21:54 -0600 From: "Herman L. Stude" <hermans@krts.com> Subject: Tie Rod ends Dear All; Upon doing my weekly fluid check when I got down to the swivels I noticed that my steering dampener was disconnected at the end that attaches to the steering rod. The bolt had been sheared off, and when I grabbed the rod to check for any play...there was lots. How does one trash a NEW dampener and two tie rod ends without knowing it. I guess there was that bachelor's party driving around in the sand dunes of South Texas. I guess I'll have to upgrade and get some greasable tie rod ends and another new dampener. I had a LR dampener, should I look into Rancho, Old Man Emu, Bilstein, etc.? Comments and suggestions greatly appreciated. Herman SIII 88 1973 ------------------------------[ <- Message 20 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970402 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Tue, 01 Apr 1997 12:26:18 -0800 From: Jeremy Bartlett <bartlett@slip.net> Subject: Re: Land-Rover conquers the world Simon Ward-Hastelow wrote: snip > A report in today's 'London Evening Standard' newspaper states that it is > now official that at least one Landrover has been sold to every country > in the world since 1948 Is this the same lot that reported the CKD D90s ? :) cheers Jeremy ------------------------------[ <- Message 21 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970402 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Tue, 01 Apr 1997 12:24:35 -0800 From: Clayton Kirkwood <kirkwood@kirkwood-desk.fm.intel.com> Subject: Re: At 02:15 PM 4/1/97 -0500, Lee Levitt wrote: >At 01:09 PM 4/1/97 -0500, John Cassidy wrote: >>Happy April Fools! I wanted to share a prank that might work on your [ truncated by list-digester (was 14 lines)] >her own batch of goodies! >Let's be careful out there boys. >Lee Hey, if her own batch of goodies are LR parts then go for it, $3000+. Yeah!! Clayton ------------------------------[ <- Message 22 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970402 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 1997 15:56:31 -0500 From: Kevin Girling <lroshop@idirect.com> Subject: Land Rover Owner International LROI are changing the look of the magazine. Some changes, probably the first of a number of planned changes or improvements were in the April issue. LROI is keen to receive feedback from readers with opinions or comments on content and style. Please respond to lroshop@idirect.com. Thank you. A reminder: anyone with event information for North America wishing a mention on the LROI information line please email us at lroshop@idirect.com ------------------------------[ <- Message 23 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970402 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 1997 16:01:09 -0500 (EST) From: Dixon Kenner <dkenner@nrn1.NRCan.gc.ca> Subject: Re: Land-Rover conquers the world On Tue, 1 Apr 1997, Simon Ward-Hastelow wrote: > A report in today's 'London Evening Standard' newspaper states that it is > now official that at least one Landrover has been sold to every country > in the world since 1948 But Albania is in the dregs just about now. Must be old news unless one sold during the pyramid schemes and they just sold one to North Korea ------------------------------[ <- Message 24 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970402 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Subject: Re: Land-Rover conquers the world Date: Tue, 1 Apr 97 22:04:23 +0100 From: Simon Ward-Hastelow <simon.110.v8@dial.pipex.com> >> A report in today's 'London Evening Standard' newspaper states that it is >> now official that at least one Landrover has been sold to every country >> in the world since 1948 >Is this the same lot that reported the CKD D90s ? :) I'm not going to fall for something like that too easily again! this time I checked the details first befor relaying the news. I work for Associated Newspapers that prints the London Evening Standard so was easy to check up. Its quite a big article accompanied by a couple of good pictures one showing about 15 Military D90s in convoy, the other showing Winston Churchill alongside a series 1 or 11 (no UKE 80) I cannot tell which because the whole vehicle cannot be seen and it has a few 'different' fittings perhaps it was a government/royal 'special' simon ------------------------------[ <- Message 25 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970402 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Tue, 01 Apr 1997 12:39:27 -0800 From: Jeremy Bartlett <bartlett@slip.net> Subject: LR Market Research Questionaire I received an independent marketing questionaire yesterday which I found quite amusing. Although it relates to the D90 I'm sure some of you fellow Series owners will also find it amusing. Among the questions was a section "Problems with Your Vehicle" with the following instructions : "Review the list and indicate any problems that have DEVELOPED in the last 12 months with your vehicle. Explain these problems in detail below." Listed with boxes for problem noticed and problem serviced boxers were: Dents/Dings Chips/Scratches in Paint Paint not Shiny or Glossy Enough Sort of makes you wonder what kind of responses get in the "detailed below" section. cheers, Jeremy ------------------------------[ <- Message 26 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970402 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Tue, 01 Apr 1997 15:37:59 -0500 From: Lee Levitt <wheelman@shore.net> Subject: Re: At 12:24 PM 4/1/97 -0800, Clayton Kirkwood wrote: >if her own batch of goodies are LR parts then go for it, $3000+. Yeah!! I think LR parts are higher on my wish list than on hers. I'd find a new Subzero fridge in the kitchen...with new Seimatic cabinets to match...and you know this will be her oneupmanship...I spend 3K, she spends 30K. Wonder if Subzeros leak 15-50 on the floor. <GRIN> Lee ************************************************************* Lee Levitt mailto:wheelman@shore.net Webmaster, NeedhamOnline.com - <http://www.NeedhamOnline.com> ListOwner, ComputerReseller Mailing List - <http://www.magicpub.com/ComputerReseller> For help with smilies and acronyms, check out <http://www.magicpub.com/netprimer> ************************************************************* ------------------------------[ <- Message 27 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970402 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: debrown@srp.gov Date: 01 Apr 97 14:36:09 MST Subject: 109 LR FROM: David Brown Internet: debrown@srp.gov Computer Graphics Specialist ~ S.R.P. ~ AM/FM - Graphic Records PAB219 (602)236-3544 - Pager:6486 External (602)275-2508 #6486 John, In response to some of your questions... Of course they can be used as a daily driver. Many people on the list(s) (there are several Land Rover lists) drive them every day. I used my 109 as a daily driver for around 6 to 9 months, and have only recently started using my Acura (had loaned it to a friend). As a daily driver, though, it may require a bit of maintenance. As they "all" leak, (short of taking special precautions to seal them up) you must keep up with checking the fluids. There are even those who own ONLY the Land Rover. I'm curious... why do you want a Series III? Most seek the II or IIa and shy away from the III's. I think the III's don't hold up as well in the dash, as they become dry-rotted and crumble apart, whereas the II's have metal dash's and will last for "eternity." Which brings me to this: I have a 1970 IIa 109 Station Wagon, 11 passenger, dual heater, tropical top that is in "very good" (a relative term) condition. It is all original, and runs well. The only "problem area" with mine is the frame is rusty. However, I have a complete spare frame that I was going to use for it and do a frame-up restoration. I bought all new seals, (gearbox, hubs, axle, swivel balls, etc...) mud flaps, 1 new swivel ball, brakes, speedometer cable (speedometer doesn't work), shifter rubbers, and many many more parts to restore it with. Now, I'm betting married in less than 3 weeks, selling two homes (hers and mine) and have come to the conclusion that there is no way I'll have the time I need to restore her. (the 109, not my fiancee!) ;-) I have probably over $8500 invested into it and would be willing to let her go for no less than that. Kind-of hate to drop to the "bottom line" right off, but I don't have the time nor inclination to dicker at this time. As I said, it runs well, and in fact, I flew to New York state to buy it, drove it to the Atlantic coast, back through Canada, and home to Phoenix Arizona about two years ago. I believe that this would be worth around twice this much once restored... all you need to add is "love." ;-) Let me know what you think. I'll be replacing the brakes, swivel ball, and some of the seals before I officially offer it for sale, but since you advertised that you're looking... Dave Brown I count him braver who overcomes #=======# _____l___ his desires than him who conquers |__|__|__\___ //__/__|__\___ his enemies; for the hardest victory | _| | |_ |} \__ - ____ - _|} is the victory over self. -Aristotle "(_)""""""(_)" (_) (_) ------------------------------[ <- Message 28 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970402 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 1997 16:55:15 -0500 (EST) From: "William L. Leacock" <wleacock@pipeline.com> Subject: Webber 2 barrel What is the concensus on the advantages ( if any ) and disadvantages ( besides the cost ) of fitting a 2 barrel webber to a 2.25 litre Land rover petrol engine ? What kind ogf performance ( ha ha ) is achieved ) ? How adversely is the fuel consumption affected ? Bill Leacock Limey in exile 89 RR; 67 - 109 and early 88. ------------------------------[ <- Message 29 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970402 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: NADdMD@aol.com Date: Tue, 1 Apr 1997 17:41:30 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: 109 LR In a message dated 97-04-01 17:33:21 EST, you write: << I'm betting married in less than 3 weeks >> Probably a better term than getting married. Nate (some of us win the bet, too) ------------------------------[ <- Message 30 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970402 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: SPYDERS@aol.com Date: Tue, 1 Apr 1997 17:45:35 -0500 (EST) Subject: Forward: News Browser: Tag Items/Land-Rover, Land Rover, Solihull, Defender/ Thought you guys would be interested... <<<Solihull, England: (Reuters) Land Rover's German parent BMW is set to announce the unveiling of the next vehicle platform to be produced by the legendary builder of four wheel drive vehicles. BMW and Land Rover are keen to capitalize on the "Retro-mobile" styles which are gaining in sales world-wide. This move was only finalized after BMW realized a profit with their Z3 Roadster and Land Rover acknowledged the tie between the legend of their "Series" vehicles and the success of the current "Defender" line.>>> <<<Land Rover will construct a Defender chassis-based vehicle which will incorporate a GRP/Poly-composite body with a no frills interior. "We feel the current Defender line to be a bit "too plush" as they say on Sloane Street. This is as a direct result of input from the American Market, and we feel we have neglected the true users of our product, namely Welsh sheep farmers and the Military. We wish to produce a true off road vehicle..." The same source indicated that the development of the new platform was spurred by the successful contracts of the military's "Wolf" version.>>> <<<In a related press release, Solihull has announced plans to extend the policy of lowering prices for their "Genuine Parts" for Series vehicles. The pricing changes will continue to affect parts for the popular Series III vehicles and will be expanded to include the Series I vehicles, which are nearing their 50th Anniversaries soon. The company does not plan to reduce parts prices for the Series II line, saying "they were a weak seller, weak performer and generally sub-standard. If you recall the car, the Series II's and IIa's are our equivalent of the Marina. Terribly bland." The same unnamed source indicated that parts for those vehicles would remain higher in cost to maintain quality in line with recent EC legislation.>>> Cool, when do we get the plastic rovers? Jim (Allen), any ideas on what'll be powering it? Eric (Zipkin), Any ideas on how many tow-points it'll have? pat. 93 "plush" 110 ------------------------------[ <- Message 31 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970402 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: SPYDERS@aol.com Date: Tue, 1 Apr 1997 17:47:06 -0500 (EST) Subject: Forward: News Browser: Tag Items/Land-Rover, Land Rover, Solihull, Defender/ Thought you guys would be interested... <<<Solihull, England: (Reuters) Land Rover's German parent BMW is set to announce the unveiling of the next vehicle platform to be produced by the legendary builder of four wheel drive vehicles. BMW and Land Rover are keen to capitalize on the "Retro-mobile" styles which are gaining in sales world-wide. This move was only finalized after BMW realized a profit with their Z3 Roadster and Land Rover acknowledged the tie between the legend of their "Series" vehicles and the success of the current "Defender" line.>>> <<<Land Rover will construct a Defender chassis-based vehicle which will incorporate a GRP/Poly-composite body with a no frills interior. "We feel the current Defender line to be a bit "too plush" as they say on Sloane Street. This is as a direct result of input from the American Market, and we feel we have neglected the true users of our product, namely Welsh sheep farmers and the Military. We wish to produce a true off road vehicle..." The same source indicated that the development of the new platform was spurred by the successful contracts of the military's "Wolf" version.>>> <<<In a related press release, Solihull has announced plans to extend the policy of lowering prices for their "Genuine Parts" for Series vehicles. The pricing changes will continue to affect parts for the popular Series III vehicles and will be expanded to include the Series I vehicles, which are nearing their 50th Anniversaries soon. The company does not plan to reduce parts prices for the Series II line, saying "they were a weak seller, weak performer and generally sub-standard. If you recall the car, the Series II's and IIa's are our equivalent of the Marina. Terribly bland." The same unnamed source indicated that parts for those vehicles would remain higher in cost to maintain quality in line with recent EC legislation.>>> Cool, when do we get the plastic rovers? Jim (Allen), any ideas on what'll be powering it? Eric (Zipkin), Any ideas on how many tow-points it'll have? pat. 93 "plush" 110 ------------------------------[ <- Message 32 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970402 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Tue, 01 Apr 1997 18:41:52 -0500 From: David Cockey <dcockey@tir.com> Subject: Re: Front Salisbury's and Rear Steps Richard of the Gurkha writes: > Also, maybe need front steps, although I'm fine, but the passenger side > could do with one, and it would look odd with a step on one side! One of our SII 88s has distinct evidence of having been fitted with a passenger side step only when new or nearly new. It won't look odd unless someone is using a mirror to examine both sides at once. Regards, David Cockey ------------------------------[ <- Message 33 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970402 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Tue, 01 Apr 1997 18:47:46 -0500 From: David Cockey <dcockey@tir.com> Subject: Re: Forward: News Browser: Tag Items/Land-Rover, Land Rover, Solihull, Defender/ Today is 1 April. SPYDERS@aol.com wrote: > Thought you guys would be interested... > <<<Solihull, England: (Reuters) [ truncated by list-digester (was 31 lines)] > Cool, when do we get the plastic rovers? Jim (Allen), any ideas on what'll be > powering it? Eric (Zipkin), Any ideas on how many tow-points it'll have? ------------------------------[ <- Message 34 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970402 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Subject: Charging problems!! Date: Tue, 1 Apr 97 18:57:17 -0600 From: "Keith W. Cooper" <kwcooper@aristotle.net> This week I finished the complete replacement of my '65 SIIA's wiring harness and dynamo rebuild. Everything worked beautifully and just like it was new. For the first time since I bought it, the old ammeter was registering amps and all the electrics worked like a charm, UNTIL...... I decided to go for a spin and got out on the highway and topped the speed out at the usual 50mph and suddenly, the charging warning light came on and the ammeter went to zero. The engine still ran fine (its a diesel and really doesn't even need the electrics except to get it started) so I drove on home. Well, as may be the case on your rover, the charging light (that light on the bottome left side of the instrument panel) is only supposed to come on when it registers no amps from the dynamo. When current begins to flow from the dynamo the lamp is no longer grounded and therefore goes out. Like just after you start the engine and rev it up some. I checked the dynamo connections and they were still intact, no fuses were blown and no wires inside the instrument panel or elsewhere that I could find had come loose. The only thing I can think of is that while at highwaymy speeds the newly rebuilt dynamo, which would easily max out the ammeter to the 30+ mark with the slightest rev in the engine, could have generated too much amperage and blown something, like itself or maybe the voltage regulator thing. I held a test-lamp up to the jumper connection (the smaller of the two connections) on the dynamo with the engine running and it did not show current, and I think there is supposed to be some current here, becauase this is what goes to the charge warning lamp to turn it off and on. Hence my theory that maybe the dynamo blew out!? Tomorrow, I will take the dynamo out and have it tested by the shop that rebuilt it. But in the meantime, does anyone have any tips or suggestions? Thanks Keith W. Cooper,MD ----------------------------------------------------------------------- * Dept. of Family and Community Medicine - UAMS * * co-founder - "Arkansas Land Rover Association" * * 1965 Series IIA 88" Diesel - "Buford" * * 1996 Discovery SE * * Visit my page at - http://www.aristotle.net/~kwcooper/LRV.html * ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------[ <- Message 35 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970402 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Tue, 01 Apr 1997 19:24:50 -0800 From: jouster@red.prmx.com (John Ousterhout) Subject: Re: Webber 2 barrel Having driven Donk, a 109 with stock engine, before and after adding a 2-bbl Weber, I will attest that it makes an obvious difference in acceleration and ability to maintain highway speeds (60mph up grades that slowed it to 50 before). With the Fairey overdrive it could cruise at 70, if the wind wasn't too strong. It also increases fuel consumption, though not too much (dropping from around 16+ to 14-mpg, highway). One drawback is that it seemed to be rather "cold-blooded", requiring choke again even after sitting for only minutes. Perhaps in hotter regions it would not be so. Off-road, they guzzle fuel, relatively speaking. Donk got about 4mpg where I got 6 in my 109 w/single bbl Weber. Power is not free, how much can you afford? JohnO 109 diesel (60mph absolute top speed) ------------------------------[ <- Message 36 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970402 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Tue, 01 Apr 1997 19:34:58 -0800 From: jouster@red.prmx.com (John Ousterhout) Subject: Re: Charging problems!! I'm still using the stock 30amp ammeter with my 65 amp Delco alternator. It rarely maxes-out for more than a few seconds right after starting, and seems to do no harm (about 9 years now). I have lately been having some ignition switch problems, which I consider normal wear after 465,000 miles. JohnO >This week I finished the complete replacement of my '65 SIIA's wiring >harness and dynamo rebuild. Everything worked beautifully and just like [ truncated by list-digester (was 49 lines)] >* Visit my page at - http://www.aristotle.net/~kwcooper/LRV.html * > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------[ <- Message 37 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970402 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Tue, 01 Apr 1997 22:02:35 -0500 From: David L Glaser <dlglaser@wam.umd.edu> Subject: Re: Forward: News Browser: Tag Items/Land-Rover, Land Rover, Solihull, Defender/ Is this an April fools joke like the CKD Defenders? Rover On, David L Glaser '94 La Ruta Maya Discover #6 dlglaser@wam.umd.edu '94 Discovery, Teal ------------------------------[ <- Message 38 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970402 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Tue, 01 Apr 1997 23:35:56 -0500 From: David L Glaser <dlglaser@wam.umd.edu> Subject: PTO Winch & Overdrive Is there anyway of mounting both a PTO winch & overdrive? I don't own a series LR at the moment, though I'm planning to buy one soon. Rover On, David l Glaser '94 La Ruta Maya Discovery #6 dlglaser@wam.umd.edu '94 Discovery, Teal ------------------------------[ <- Message 39 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970402 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 02 Apr 1997 00:05:04 -0500 From: David Cockey <dcockey@tir.com> Subject: Re: PTO Winch & Overdrive David L Glaser wrote: > Is there anyway of mounting both a PTO winch & overdrive? > I don't own a series LR at the moment, though I'm planning to buy one > soon. Several ways: 1) Use a end of crankshaft driven PTO winch. 2) Stretch the definition of PTO and use a hydraulic winch with a bottom PTO driven pump or belt driven pump. 3) Find a way to drive the winch from the bottom PTO, feasibility undetermined. David Cockey SII Pickup w/ overdrive and capstan winch ------------------------------[ <- Message 40 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970402 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Tue, 01 Apr 1997 21:28:12 -0800 From: Granville Pool <gpool@pacific.net> Subject: Re: PTO Winch & Overdrive David L Glaser wrote: >> Is there anyway of mounting both a PTO winch & overdrive? >> I don't own a series LR at the moment, though I'm planning to buy one >> soon. David Cockey wrote: >Several ways: >1) Use a end of crankshaft driven PTO winch. [ truncated by list-digester (was 6 lines)] >3) Find a way to drive the winch from the bottom PTO, feasibility >undetermined. It's my understanding that driving a PTO winch is precisely the purpose of a bottom PTO as it only has output forward and in more or less the position of a more typical PTO designed for a winch. I have a parts diagram of one around here somewhere. I've always lusted for one of those--what LRO hasn't? Understand they're pretty nearly unobtainium. Granny Redwood Valley ------------------------------[ <- Message 41 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970402 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 1997 22:10:55 -0800 From: David Place <dplace@mb.sympatico.ca> Subject: jWindow treatment Has anyone ever taken the centre metal piece out of the IIA window and gone with one piece of glass right across like the newer version? Dave VE4PN ------------------------------[ <- Message 42 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970402 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: MOKE67@aol.com Date: Wed, 2 Apr 1997 00:51:16 -0500 (EST) Subject: RRO Digest Greetings from Chicago to all. Is the RRO digest still around? I've tried a couple of different was to sign on with no luck. If it's up and running, what is the proper sign on format? Thanks for any help Rich Range (as in Range Rover) WB9SFG ------------------------------[ <- Message 43 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970402 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 1997 22:45:20 -0800 (PST) From: Don MacDonald <don@direct.ca> Subject: Re: jWindow treatment Yes, I've seen this done. Works fine. BUT, It's cheaper to replace one small sheet of glass than to replace the whole thing. Later, Don >Has anyone ever taken the centre metal piece out of the IIA window and >gone with one piece of glass right across like the newer version? >Dave VE4PN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Don MacDonald <don@direct.ca> <http://mypage.direct.ca/d/don> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------[ <- Message 44 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970402 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 1997 02:07:28 -0500 From: Alain Hoffmann <AlainHoffmann@compuserve.com> Subject: Heated Front Windscreens This is not an commercial advertisement. We are ordering heated front Windscreens at an english manufacturer. Only drawback is he will only start producing them if we take at least 5. So if anyone is interested in electricaly heated front glass for his 90/110/Defender please contact me directly at 100770.1655@Compuserve.com. They have those very fine wires like the new Discos or BMW's which are almost invisible. Oh yes, the price will be around 150 £ (British) + SHIPPING/HANDLING from here (Luxembourg, Europe) to your home. BTW, anyone interested in heated mirrors for 90/110's? Work great in cold or rainy weather. ---ALAIN--- ------------------------------[ <- Message 45 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970402 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Davies, Scott" <sdavies@monetpost.stdavids.ncr.com> Subject: RE: jWindow treatment Date: Wed, 02 Apr 97 08:57:00 PST I seem to remember reading somewhere that there was a problem with the glass cracking due to the bodywork flexing. The rounded corners on 90 and 110 screens was to cure this problem. As someone else already pointed out it's cheaper to replace the glass for half the screen. Scott Davies '85 110 2.5D HT ---------- From: David Place Subject: jWindow treatment Date: 31 March 1997 22:10 Has anyone ever taken the centre metal piece out of the IIA window and gone with one piece of glass right across like the newer version? Dave VE4PN ------------------------------[ <- Message 46 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970402 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Jim Farmery" <farmer_j@pace2.pace.co.uk> Date: Wed, 2 Apr 1997 10:32:56 GMT Subject: Series III Land Rover Purchase I am about to purchase my first Land Rover, a series III W reg, diesel with a 2.5ltr engine for stlg2000 stlg. I am considering a vehicle check from the AA - costing stlg160 - does this cover chassis condition ? Is it worth it ? I do not want tp parted from my hard earned cash only to find that I need a new chassis in two years (Or weeks !) I am buying it from an Authorised LR Dealer - does this give me any security ? Finally two more questions - How does the 2.5ltr engine perform - would I be wise to fit an overdrive ?, it has damage to the rear panel behind the wheel including a small hole - how do I patch it ?. Thanks He's painting his car with a paint brush !!! ------------------------------[ <- Message 47 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970402 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Andy Woodward <azw@aber.ac.uk> Date: Wed, 2 Apr 1997 10:56:42 +0000 Subject: Re: A few queries about my new SIII. >Lenny, >Welcome to the list, it's good to have some more Scottish based [ truncated by list-digester (was 9 lines)] >ground clearance off-road. Against: a. Depending on the engine you >have, acceleration (never a strong point) will become diabolical. If Erm. I was under the impression that the 16 inch rims fittted as standard in th UK were teh same for teh SWB and the LWB? So you could simply drop 7.50s onto teh stock rims. Am I mistaken on this? ------------------------------[ <- Message 48 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970402 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Andy Woodward <azw@aber.ac.uk> Date: Wed, 2 Apr 1997 10:56:42 +0000 Subject: A few queries about my new SIII. >I have 6.00 x 16 Avon Traction Mileage tyres, on SWB rims. What >pressure should they be at????? I vaguely remember 35 front and !!45!! rear - for fully loaded and 35 rear for unladen. >If I wanted to change to radials with a road bias, would I be better >getting LWB rims, or just road tyres to fit these rims??? (All the >tyres are good, and I canna afford to change them now!) Yoiu can fit 205R16 radials or even 7.50s to the stock rims. I went for teh 205s and the tyre life sshot up to 40-50k from 15k! But you can only get M&S pattern tyres in this size - no pure road patterns :( So I am trying to wear all my 205s out at teh same time, then I change to 7.50s (the speedo will need a new drve gear cos of teh taller tyre profile) cos then I have the choice of everything from dumper tyres to pure road-rib pattern truck tyres. Go for teh 7.50s cos you can get any type of tyre you wwant. ------------------------------[ <- Message 49 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970402 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Davies, Scott" <sdavies@monetpost.stdavids.ncr.com> Subject: RE: Series III Land Rover Purchase Date: Wed, 02 Apr 97 11:17:00 PST >I am about to purchase my first Land Rover, a series III W reg, >diesel with a 2.5ltr engine for stlg2000 stlg. [ truncated by list-digester (was 6 lines)] >parted from my hard earned cash only to find that I need a new >chassis in two years (Or weeks !) The AA check should cover the chassis, if your still worried crawl underneath yourself armed with a sturdy screwdriver and start poking around. Poke and bang it hard, if it's sound you won't do it any harm. >I am buying it from an Authorised LR Dealer - does this give me any >security ? Would you trust ANY used car salesman ? :-) >it has damage to the rear >panel behind the wheel including a small hole - how do I patch it ?. I used chemical metal ( an epoxy filler) on mine, but the purists will hate you for this approach. >He's painting his car with a paint brush !!! My friend's sIII was brush painted and looked quite good. Scott Davies '85 110 2.5D HT ------------------------------[ <- Message 50 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970402 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
END OF * LIST DIGEST Input: messages 49 lines 1889 [forwarded 222 whitespace 412] Output: lines 1361 [content 853 forwarded 97 (cut 125) whitespace 376][ First Message | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970402 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Back | Forward | |
---|---|---|
Photos & text Copyright 1990-2011 Bill Caloccia, All rights reserved. Digest Messages Copyright 1990-2011 by the original poster or/and Bill Caloccia, All rights reserved.
|