[ First Message Last | Table of Contents | <- Digest -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 1997 07:04:59 -0500 From: Michel Bertrand <mbertran@interlinx.qc.ca> Subject: Re: dual line brakes conversion tutorial (long) >involved/cost? Vehicle is a `63 SIIa 88". Thanks in Advance, Rick Hello Rick, Been there, done that, (twice) If you still have the original system, it consists of: Brake master cylinder with one line coming in from the reservoir and one line going out to the 5-way junction on the passenger-side(near the footbox) on the frame. Clutch master cylinder with one line coming in from the reservoir and one line going out to the clutch slave cylinder The idea is to find yourself a used brake servo and brake master cylinder with the pedal box and also a clutch master cylinder and pedal box, all from a Ser III 88". If you could find a Ser III inlet Manifold, that would also be good, if not, you can arrange something (that's for the vaccumm that you will need to operate the booster). If you have to use the original clutch assembly, you will have to find a way to put a plug in the reservoir outlet hole (for the brakes) so that you don't have brake fluid going all over the place. The Ser III brake master cylinder has an integral reservoir, so you don't need the remote one anymore. The Ser III clutch master cylinder also has an integral reservoir, so if you go that route, you can chuck out the remote reservoir, which is probably rusty, anyway. To replace the clutch master cylinder, I think that you have to remove the wing (It is a LHD, right?) Anyway, it will be easier to cut out the wing once it is removed. You have to cut out the wing cos' the booster has a 9" diameter and the wing is in the way. The master cylinder, with the reservoir, is also longer and higher than the original. It is better to find yourself a Ser III wing somewhere and to have a big piece of cardboard to carve yourself a model. We will start with the wing. Once you have the pattern drawn on the cardboard, put in on the wing and draw on the wing where the wing should normally end in order for the booster and MC to be clear. Then, with your chalk, or pencil, trace a similar line one inch closer to the engine bay on the wing, following exactly the same curves and such. You should now have two parralells (sp) lines on your wing. This is done in order to avoid having any sharp edges on the wing. With a pair of sheetmetal scissors, or pliers, cut along the line which is closest to the engine bay. Than, at every inch or so, make a perpedicular cut starting from that fresh edge you just did going towards the line that you first draw. It should look like something like this: _____________________ | | | | | | | | | | | Then with a pair of large nose wise-grips, gently fold down every single tab along the line, like if it was a miniature brake (sp?). Use bodyshop tools in order to make a nice job. You are done with the wing. Now, the clutch master cylinder: Remove the old pedal box assembly after disconecting the pipes and put the new one in. It should be a straight fit. Reconnect the line and bleed the clutch. Now, the brake master cylinder: Remove the lines, and the whole pedal bracket assembly. Chuck it out. Cut the hole in the footwell for the pedal arm so that it fits. Put the new pedal assembly in. Up to now, it is really easy. Again, it is a straight fit.Now it is time to have fun with the brake lines. The brake line closest to the bulkhead goes to the rear and the one farthest from the bulkhead goes to the front. You will use the 5-junction piece for the rear brakes and brake-light switch. Bring that line from the MC to the junction box. From there, don't touch the line going to the rear, you won't need to replace it. There is one outlet for the brake light switch will will remain intact. The others was used to go the the front wheels. You need to find a plug that will fit in order to block and seal that outlet. (You can use a dead brake-light switch). You now have your rear brakes connected. For the front brakes, you will need a 3-way junction as seen in the rear, on top of the axle casing, bolted on the frame. I found mine at the local bolt and nut specialist, with the right threads. It was much cheaper. Bring a line from the MC to the 3-way junction and two lines from there to the wheels. Now, you have your front brakes connected. Now you need to connect your servo with some kind of vaccum gizmo. Some carbs, like the Weber, if I remember correctly, have a provided oultet in order to install a vaccum pipe from there to the booster. If not, you have three choices: 1) Install a Ser III inlet manifold which has the hole and gizmo factory-installed 2) Drill and tap a hole in your inlet manifold (Don't forget to remove the carb so you can pick-up all the fine metal particles which have dropped in the manifold before it goes in the engine) 3) Install an electric vaccum pump. Saves a little bit of Horse power, but noisy and it vibrates alot. There is a copper-pipe, about 5/16 in diameter that goes from the manifold to a rubber hose (you can find the right size at any auto-part, just get 12" of fuel line of the correct dia) which is connected to the booster. Bleed the brakes. Voila, power assisted brakes. You realize that it is two sepearte systems, that if you break a line in the rear, you will still have front brakes, and vice-versa. Hope this helps, and if you have any questions, don't hesitate to e-mail me. Done it twice, and double-braking since, Michel Bertrand ______ Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada, / __ / \ 1963 109 PU (Rudolph) | Lucas | 1968 109 SW (in the works) | Inside | 1973 88 SW (21st century project) \ / \______/ ------------------------------[ <- Message 2 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970306 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: NADdMD@aol.com Date: Wed, 5 Mar 1997 08:18:32 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: painting prep? In a message dated 97-03-04 22:21:17 EST, you write: << Hi all, Yes I know painting has been covered , but is there a special process for prime coating bare alum. so it doesn`t peel. >> Hi Rick, There is an etching primer that you can use. It is nasty stuff but works great. Sherwin-Williams off Joppa (near Loch Raven Blvd) carries it and can give you excellent tips on use. Nate NADdMD@aol.com ------------------------------[ <- Message 3 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970306 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Roland Klein <klein@bond.net> Subject: Birmabrite painting Date: Wed, 05 Mar 97 08:33:10 PST Does anyone know the material spec for the aluminum used in the body panels, and whether it is clad or unclad? I am thinking it's not clad. In any case, I believe a chemical conversion coating process is helpfull if you remove paint to the bare metal, (I think it's called alodine). Also, steel wool will have the same effect as wire brushes WRT imbedding micro particles of steel into the aluminum, resulting in galvanic corrosion. Roland Klein 1968 Series IIA 88" Station Wagon ------------------------------[ <- Message 4 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970306 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 1997 8:23:03 -0500 From: "Adams, Bill" <badams@usia.gov> Subject: Re: painting prep? Rick, go to the boat store and buy a quart of self etching primer. Z-Spar, Petit, Interlux, et. al. make a version. Brush, roller, or spray application. Bill Adams 3D Artist/Animator '66 Land Rover S2A 109 Diesel Station Wagon: "Practicing the ancient oriental art of ren-ching" ------------------------------[ <- Message 5 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970306 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Alan_Richer/CAM/Lotus@lotus.com Date: Wed, 5 Mar 1997 08:25:47 -0400 Subject: Anybody need a '58 Series II station-wagon door? (Boston, MA. My latest project (a 67 88 of dubious reliability but loads of character) arrived on my doorstep sporting the driver's door off a 58 Series II Station Wagon. It's a great door, but I'd rather have the type the old boy was originally fitted with. For the uninitiated, the Series II (not IIa) Station Wagons had front doors that were one-piece, with no detatchable door top. As the 109 SW wasn't designed to have its roof removed, this made a lot of sense, making for a more rigid assembly. However, it doesn't have a place in my scheme of things. i'd like to trade it even for a IIa door and door top - email condition. Delivery/pickup/meet you in the middle is eminently possible, so don't be afraid to ask Al Richer ------------------------------[ <- Message 6 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970306 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Ron Franklin" <oldhaven@mail.biddeford.com> Date: Wed, 5 Mar 1997 08:52:21 -0500 Subject: Re: Anybody need a '58 Series II station-wagon door? (Boston, M On 5 Mar 97 at 8:25, Alan_Richer/CAM/Lotus@lotus.c wrote: My latest project (a 67 88 of dubious reliability but loads of character) arrived on my doorstep sporting the driver's door off a 58 Series II Station Wagon. It's a great door, but I'd rather have the type the old boy was originally fitted with. For the uninitiated, the Series II (not IIa) Station Wagons had front doors that were one-piece, with no detatchable door top. As the 109 SW wasn't designed to have its roof removed, this made a lot of sense, making for a more rigid assembly. @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ Not only station wagons had one piece doors, as my '59 SII pickup with removeable cab top has them. I'm not sure of the reason for them, though they went away quickly even in the SII models. I would guess they were the first version of the new body with the nice hips, but the ability to remove the door tops as in SI's was a nice feature missed by all and they were brought back. Does anyone out there know the whole story? Ron Franklin '59 109 w/one piece doors '60 88 w/two piece doors '65 88 w/doors falling to pieces Bowdoin, Maine, USA ------------------------------[ <- Message 7 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970306 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 1997 8:51:23 -0500 From: "Adams, Bill" <badams@usia.gov> Subject: Enquiring minds want to know... The Kirkwood household is all abuzz regarding things Rover... As to the overdrive question, it depends on what your driving needs are. An overdrive helps on the highway considerably and is highly recommended if that is the major portion of your mileage. They are useless off-road. Used ones are rare and new ones, when available, run in the range of $700. Switching to 16" wheels and tires helps in your quest for speed. As far as I know, there isn't an exchange gear for the T-box, rather a higher diff ratio. I think it's possible to build a stump-pulling highway rocket, but consider the costs and engineering. Replace the shocks if they are wet with fluid, rusting away or otherwise obviously unserviceable. Bushings are easily replaced if that's the problem. Springs that have gone bye-bye are also easily diagnosed. Splaying or flattening of the leaves, rust damage, broken leaves and the like are sure signs. The bent spring plate you mention will not adversely affect the performance of the truck, but if the springs need replacing, a new one is in order. If you replace springs, consider polyurethane bushings. On the issue of seat belts, don't use friggin' velcro. There are seatbelt mounting kits available which will safely mount on the truck. Others have used aftermarket generic kits from Whitney. The roll cage idea makes the most sense from a safety standpoint, as the belts can be permanently mounted to something that goes straight to the frame. Bill Adams 3D Artist/Animator '66 Land Rover S2A 109 Diesel Station Wagon: "Practicing the ancient oriental art of ren-ching" ------------------------------[ <- Message 8 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970306 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Andy Woodward <azw@aber.ac.uk> Date: Wed, 5 Mar 1997 14:48:58 +0000 Subject: Proper Chassis Paint >Does anyone out there know the type and make of paint that Land-Rover >applies to their frames at the factory? If not, what is the closest >quality paint that will replicate it? You dont want to do >that<............. ------------------------------[ <- Message 9 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970306 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 1997 08:56:02 -0500 From: Nick Fankhauser <nickf@co.wayne.in.us> Subject: Re: SIII gearbox in a SIIA ?? Peter- regarding ajr's suggestion that you swap bell housings- Sounds like a good idea, but while doing it, look out for the hidden gotcha that got me this weekend. I was doing a bell housing swap between two series IIa trannys because one was cracked. Both were identical externally, but the layshaft bearing (and shaft, of course) was smaller in the older transmission. I was swapping between a suffix "A", and suffix "B" it turns out. The story is humorous in retrospect-- I spent about 4 hours dismantling both bell housings, and had everything transferred *except* the layshaft bearing when I discovered my mistake. After stewing for a bit, I decided the cracked housing was still strong enough to function safely, transferred everything *back* and reassembled the tranny with the original cracked suffix "B" housing. (3 more hours). So I basically spent my Sunday accomplishing nothing with a great deal of effort. Monday morning, a set of brake parts arrives from Rovers North with a bargain sales flyer for odd parts in the box....listing a suffix B bell housing for $20. -NickF ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Nick Fankhauser | Wayne County Information Systems Department NickF@co.wayne.in.us | http://co.wayne.in.us/wayneco ------------------------------[ <- Message 10 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970306 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Alan_Richer/CAM/Lotus@lotus.com Date: Wed, 5 Mar 1997 09:10:18 -0400 Subject: Re: Proper Chassis Paint RustOleum? What's wrong with RustOleum? Rustoelum Satin Black, applied over a proper basecoat, is quite close to the original paint I've seen, at least for an easily-available paint here in the USA. I had the distinct joy of painting Spencer Norcross' new galvanized frame before we installed it. The beast received an acid wash, 3 coats of primer and 3 coats of black - looked quite nice, and except where he's bashed it on rocks, has held up well. There are better coatings, but satin black is satin black, and unless ou're building a concours machine, it'll do fine. ajr ------------------------------[ <- Message 11 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970306 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Subject: Re: Bright Works Rovers Date: Wed, 05 Mar 1997 10:00:52 -0500 From: William Caloccia <caloccia@openmarket.com> There is one of the unpainted 90" display models at the Heritage Motor Centre. Photo at: http://www2.land-rover.team.net/HMC/hmc-90-croc.html ------------------------------[ <- Message 12 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970306 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 1997 07:09:15 -0800 From: twakeman@scruznet.com (TeriAnn Wakeman) Subject: Re: dual line brakes conversion tutorial (long) At 7:04 AM 3/5/97 -0500, Michel Bertrand wrote: I have a couple of comments on this from my own experience. >The idea is to find yourself a used brake servo and brake master cylinder >with the pedal box and also a clutch master cylinder and pedal box, all from >a Ser III 88". ; As far as I know Rover did not change the clutch pedal assy. If you look at them, they look the same. I personally have fitted a series III master cylinder to an early IIA pedal assy and have used it for a few years. One thing I forgot to mention in my reply and Michael forgot to mention is the rear wing mounting flange. There is an 'L' shaped bracket attached to the bulkhead. You will need to cut the inner half of the flange off for the clutch master cylinder to fit. You will have one mounting hole left. >You will use the 5-junction piece for the rear brakes and brake-light >switch. Bring that line from the MC to the junction box. From there, don't ;touch the line going to the rear, you won't need to replace it. There is one >outlet for the brake light switch will will remain intact. The others was >used to go the the front wheels. You need to find a plug that will fit in ;order to block and seal that outlet. (You can use a dead brake-light switch). ; We differ here. Since you have a single line going from your master cylinder and a single line going to the rear, you completely remove the 5 way. Remember, there is a brake light switch on the new brake pedal assembly. Just run a pair of wires from the old brake harness connectors to the new brake light switch. ALSO I have lost my brakes twice in my Land Rover from rust pin hole leaks. This is an excellent time to examine your line and renew it if it shows any signs of rust spots. >For the front brakes, you will need a 3-way junction as seen in the rear, on >top of the axle casing, bolted on the frame. I found mine at the local bolt >and nut specialist, with the right threads. It was much cheaper. ; You need to be aware that British and US brake line connectors ARE NOT COMPATIBLE. They use the same diameter and thread but the British fittings have a long nose before the threads. If you thread a British male fitting into a US female fitting only a few threads will be holding it together. If you do it the other way. the male fitting will be threaded all the way in without properly seating the flair. Use US fittings with US fittings and British fittings with British fittings. (Rovers North carries tube fittings, Eastwood carries the proper flairing tools if you want to make your own tubing) >1) Install a Ser III inlet manifold which has the hole and gizmo >factory-installed Unstead of a series II gizmo, I used a street elbow and slid on hose fitting from my local parts store. It works fine. TeriAnn Wakeman "Large format photographers look Santa Cruz California at the world upside down and twakeman@scruznet.com backwards" ------------------------------[ <- Message 13 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970306 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "John J. Tackley" <jtackley.dit@state.va.us> Date: Wed, 5 Mar 1997 10:21:24 -500 Subject: Ownership "Quique Salavert".......re: Land Rover 88 Super, he said, " The fact is that I'm interested in one that owns a neighbour..." ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Were truer words ever spoken ??? *** John J. Tackley, Richmond, VA *** * '74 SIII 88" "Gen. Lee" * * '81 300SD * * '89 FLHS "OINK" (That'l do, pig) * ------------------------------[ <- Message 14 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970306 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 05 Mar 1997 17:53:21 +0200 From: Paul Oxley <paul@adventures.co.za> Subject: Re: Anybody need a '58 Series II station-wagon door? (Boston, MA. Alan_Richer/CAM/Lotus@lotus.com wrote: > For the uninitiated, the Series II (not IIa) Station Wagons had front doors > that were one-piece, with no detatchable door top. As the 109 SW wasn't > designed to have its roof removed, > Al Richer Hi Al, Was this phenomenon an North American-market only thing (single piece doors on the SII SW), 'cos I haven't heard of or come across this before. Ya live 'n learn... Regards Paul Oxley http://www.adventures.co.za ------------------------------[ <- Message 15 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970306 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "John J. Tackley" <jtackley.dit@state.va.us> Date: Wed, 5 Mar 1997 10:57:36 -500 Subject: seat belts Clayton: I recently found that front seat belts from a mid '80s Saab 4 dr is the near identical unit to the LR ones, the only difference being that they needs a vertical orientation, rather than the 45 degree orientation that the LR mounting provides. Easily accomplished by fabricating a steel plate bent in the proper angles to mount to either the rear bulkhead or the tub capping. The bulkhead is the preferred location ( use 4 grade 8 bolts, with a steel backing plate) as the belt bends along its 'flat' axis when passing thru the shoulder bracket. When mounted to the cappings, it must bend along the edge axis, which doesn't work at all. For a 4 point harness you could use the old static belts by mounting a second plate to the bulkhead behind the right shoulder as an attachment point for the static belt. A little creative snipping and sewing ( and maybe a little velcro, too) and voila, a two piece, 4 point harness, utilizing the center seat belt mounting points for the right side driver harness. Each would 'hook' seperately, but would be quite functional, I should think. ( hey, this is not a bad idea. think I'll put those old static belts to good use this way.) Good Luck. *** John J. Tackley, Richmond, VA *** * '74 SIII 88" "Gen. Lee" * * '81 300SD * * '89 FLHS "OINK" (That'l do, pig) * ------------------------------[ <- Message 16 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970306 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Alan_Richer/CAM/Lotus@lotus.com Date: Wed, 5 Mar 1997 11:12:32 -0400 Subject: Re: Anybody need a '58 Series II station-wagon door? (Boston, MA. Near as I know (and this is hearsay from LROI) these doors were used on the Series II 109 SW, though someone on the list mentioned that their II 2-door also had them. I heard about them as part of the Series II restoration that LROI was doing a year or so ago - their 109 had them. As they're in the UK, it leads me to believe that this was just one of those bright ideas that got dumped quick... aj"But I still don't have a replacement!"r ------------------------------[ <- Message 17 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970306 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Alan_Richer/CAM/Lotus@lotus.com Date: Wed, 5 Mar 1997 11:17:39 -0400 Subject: Re: seat belts When I bought Mr. Churchill, all he had was lap belts. This was NOT going to do. I ended up buying the Rover mounts for my pickup cab and fitting him with inertia-reels from a Suzuki Samurai. The reels bolted right up, needing only to have the belt turned about in the top swivel bit. The buckles needed to come from a compatible Japanese thingy, as the Suzuki anchors were too short to work in the Rover aplication. I think a Mazda pickup provided them... The sad bit was that the Suzuki I got them out of had obviously never had its belts used at all...and there was a large smash in the middle of the windshield... aj"The belts were unfortunately brand-new..."r ------------------------------[ <- Message 18 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970306 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 1997 08:26:45 -0800 (PST) From: gpool@pacific.net (Granville Pool) Subject: Re: Anybody need a '58 Series II station-wagon door? (Boston, MA. Alan Richer wrote: > For the uninitiated, the Series II (not IIa) Station Wagons had front doors >that were one-piece, with no detatchable door top. As the 109 SW wasn't >designed to have its roof removed, Paul Oxley wrote: >Was this phenomenon an North American-market only thing (single piece >doors on the SII SW), 'cos I haven't heard of or come across this >before. Ya live 'n learn... I've had numerous Series II 88s and found that ones with plain hardtops and tailgates, as well as station wagons, were fitted with either one-piece or two-piece doors. My first Land-Rover was a '59 88" hardtop which had one-piece doors. Then (after a few IIAs) I had a very original '58 88" hardtop which had one-piece doors. I currently have a '60 88" station wagon which has two-piece doors (although it was apparently in Africa so presumably not a U.S. specification vehicle). I also have a SII 88" hardtop parts vehicle with two-piece doors (no, they aren't usable, Al; their frames are all rusted). I must say that the one-piece doors fit much better (more snugly) at the top and are therefore much less prone to air (and water) leaks and rattles. But it gets hotter than blue blazes where I live so it's nice to be able to take the door tops off, even if I'm not taking the roof off. Granville "Granny" Pool Redwood Valley, CA, USA '73 SIII 88 (the Snark) ------------------------------[ <- Message 19 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970306 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 1997 08:53:18 -0800 From: "Tom Gross [ESRI-Redlands]" <tgross@esri.com> Subject: Re: overdrives for my wife's 59 88 Swapping for lower gear ratios??!! I'd suggest that even if you could do this that you should not do it. Land Rover axle shafts are not known for extreme strength. I've twisted off more than one. A lower gear ratio seems to be a recipe for bending, twisting, wrenching and generally causing havoc with the rest of the drive train. Just use low range and take it easy. If you really do need lower gears than 1st-low, I'd consider walking. It would probably be a lot faster and more comfortable. Tom Gross tgross@esri.com ------------------------------[ <- Message 20 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970306 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 05 Mar 1997 18:38:37 +0200 From: Paul Oxley <paul@adventures.co.za> Subject: Re: Anybody need a '58 Series II station-wagon door? (Boston, MA. Granville Pool wrote: > I must say that the one-piece doors fit much better (more snugly) at the top Granville "Granny" Pool > Redwood Valley, CA, USA > '73 SIII 88 (the Snark) Granville (I'd feel odd calling you "Granny") and others, A couple of guys locally have started turning out replacement door tops for series vehicles. These replacement tops are steel instead of tin with ally foil wrapping and are much more solid (also much heavier so their effect on the door hinges must be quite devastating), but they also make for a much more rigid unit which seals far more efficiently and lasts much longer. The units are very well made and are fully galvanised. I had to patch up a couple of SIII door tpops last year and if had known of these replacements would definately have used them. Regards Paul Oxley http://www.adventures.co.za BTW: My neighbour has turned and milled up a couple of side shafts to experiment with. His theory is that if he machines them flat along their length they will be inclined to flex rather than twist off. What does the list think, has anyone tried anything similar before? ------------------------------[ <- Message 21 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970306 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 1997 08:46:46 -0800 From: Uncle Roger <sinasohn@crl.com> Subject: Webbery Granville -- If you have some spare time, (I know you have tons! 8^) could you take a look at some new web pages I've been working on for the LROA? Any suggestions, criticisms, etc. you've got would be greatly appreciated. (I've not had much luck getting feedback from the LROA officers.) Here's the message I sent them most recently: Oh, the URL would help, eh? It's <http://www.crl.com/~sinasohn/newlroa/index.htm>. It's not open to the public yet, though. Thanks! --------------------------------- Here's the status of the new web pages as of 3/4/97. Nick and I discussed picking a date for rollout, perhaps to coincide with the next AW? Anyway, here's what's there, and its status: Office General Info -- Sketchy, but there. I'd like to put up some more info, and maybe some more historical stuff. Officers/Vol -- Need some info about officers, and I may be missing some volunteers. Business Plan -- As taken from Michael Carradine's pages. Org Outline -- As taken from MC's pages. Art/Incorp -- As taken from MC's pages. Clubhouse Membership -- Sketchy, but mostly complete. Charter clubs -- **Fake Data** Made it up just to see the layout. Other Clubs -- Complete. Please let me know if you hear of new pages. Bulletin Board Trips/Events -- **Fake Data** Wording may need some work. Lemme know. FS/T/W -- **Fake Data** Check the layout and wording. Vendor LIst -- Real data, per Brad. Sorted by State/City/Name. May need some cleanup? Library Workhorse -- There, with sample Spr'93 to see layout. More info? Wishful Think -- Need to scan images. Workshop Equip Library -- What do we have, what are our plans? Contact? Media Library -- What do we have, what are our plans? Contact? Lounge Member Direct -- **Fake Data** Need to get real data, images. Resources -- Needs organization. I've checked every link (in the past week) except the miniatures and GPS links. This could really use some work in organization and finding additional links. What needs to be checked on all pages: Accuracy -- Make sure what I've written is true/real. (Except for fake data) Grammar -- Check my spelling and grammar. Layout -- Is the layout and formatting acceptable? Wording -- Am I saying things right? Or am I opening us up for lawsuits? Overall -- Is the look and feel acceptable? The metaphors? Etc? Please don't worry about telling me it looks great; I already think so, and my ego is plenty big as it is. Please *DO* tell me what sucks, stinks, or looks stupid. I promise my feelings won't be hurt; in fact, I love (constructive) criticism. Standards: I've tried to implement some consistancy across the site. For each page, the title consists of "LROA", a space, two hyphens ("--"), another space, and the name of the page (as in "General Info"). On the page itself, a level 1 heading of "The Land Rover Owners Association" is centered, followed by a level 2 heading of the name of the page. Next is a horizontal rule, and a level 2 heading with a description of what the page is about. All of this is centered. I'd like to use a graphic for the level 1 heading, in the same font as the logo (Oracle/StarTrek). I'd also like to put the LROA logo (in the NA map) to the left of all that. I'd also like to come up with a color scheme, but my artistic talents are rather limited. Same for a background. So, if anyone has suggestions for either, please let me know. I must admit I'm not real fond of images (logos) as backgrounds (like the OVLR pages) as they often make the text hard to read. If done right, however, they're okay. So, perhaps the LROA in the NA map would be good. And if anyone has any suggestions for keywords for the meta tag for Altavista et al to search on, please let me know. Thanks in advance! --------------------------------------------------------------------- O- Uncle Roger "There is pleasure pure in being mad sinasohn@crl.com that none but madmen know." Roger Louis Sinasohn & Associates San Francisco, California http://www.crl.com/~sinasohn/ ------------------------------[ <- Message 22 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970306 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 1997 08:49:57 -0800 (PST) From: gpool@pacific.net (Granville Pool) Subject: Custom door tops (was Re: Anybody need ... door?) Paul Oxley wrote: >A couple of guys locally have started turning out replacement door tops >for series vehicles. These replacement tops are steel instead of tin [ truncated by list-digester (was 8 lines)] >galvanised. I had to patch up a couple of SIII door tpops last year and >if had known of these replacements would definately have used them. I hope that anyone going to the trouble of making custom door-tops will be using the double-sliding D-90 still windows, instead of the very annoying fixed-front-panel Series style! Granny ------------------------------[ <- Message 23 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970306 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 1997 19:23:54 -0500 (EST) From: Dixon Kenner <dkenner@emr1.NRCan.gc.ca> Subject: IDAR (Land Rover Identification Programme) After a bit of a hiatus the RoverWeb IDAR programme is again working. For those who do remember, IDAR can be found at http://www.off-road.com/RoverWeb/IDAR/ For those who are new, here is a brief overview... While searching for something to do for Jan's final project for his Artificial Intelligence class,he noticed that Ben was busy getting the RoverWeb up and running. Jan glanced thru one the FAQ pages and realized that it was hard to figure out what kind of Land Rover he was looking at. In other words, there were many more kinds of Land Rovers than he had previously realized. So here was the idea for his final project: Build an Expert System that would ask questions and figure out what kind of Land Rover the user was looking at. Of course, he didn't want to type the answers to the various questions, and wanted to put it on the Web to help Ben out. Currently the database contains 12 Land Rovers. These are most everything except the Discovery, Forward Control, and Range Rover models (we hope to add these later...) There are 10 questions which are asked, unless a single match is made earlier. This Expert system (ES) is specially setup to handle "Don't Know" answers, in the event that a good answer can't be determined. This has proven to be one of its best features, in case one is looking at a photo or running the ES from memory and can't remember a specific. The question pages also show which Land Rover match so far, and provides a way to "Backtrack" to a previous question, which is useful for exploring the ES's knowledge base. Try it out... :-) ------------------------------[ <- Message 24 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970306 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 05 Mar 1997 18:57:48 +0200 From: Paul Oxley <paul@adventures.co.za> Subject: Re: Custom door tops (was Re: Anybody need ... door?) Granville Pool wrote: > Paul Oxley wrote: > >A couple of guys locally have started turning out replacement door tops [ truncated by list-digester (was 15 lines)] > fixed-front-panel Series style! > Granny Ummm...I suppose its a matter of opinion, the fixed-front-panel ensures that you don't get whacked through the face every time you drive too close to a branch. These door tops I'm referring to are just bare frames. You put your own window channel and glass in, so you should be able to set them up to slide either way. Regards Paul Oxley http://www.adventures.co.za ------------------------------[ <- Message 25 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970306 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: NADdMD@aol.com Date: Wed, 5 Mar 1997 12:09:19 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: seat belts In a message dated 97-03-05 11:31:50 EST, you write: << I ended up buying the Rover mounts for my pickup cab and fitting him with inertia-reels from a Suzuki Samurai. The reels bolted right up, needing only to have the belt turned about in the top swivel bit. The buckles needed to come from a compatible Japanese thingy, as the Suzuki anchors were too short to work in the Rover aplication. I think a Mazda pickup provided them... >> Hi Al, Do the Suzuki inertia reels mount vertically? I'm looking for something I could mount to the rollcage in the Summer (vertical poles) and to the mounting bolt on the side of the hard top in Winter (again a vertical mounting). Something with an angled pull would be a bit of a pain. Nate NADdMD@aol.com ------------------------------[ <- Message 26 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970306 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 05 Mar 1997 09:11:16 -0800 From: jouster@redm.primextech.com (John Ousterhout) Subject: machined side shafts? Paul Oxley writes (snip): >BTW: My neighbour has turned and milled up a couple of side shafts to >experiment with. His theory is that if he machines them flat along their >length they will be inclined to flex rather than twist off. What does >the list think, has anyone tried anything similar before? Please explain further. Are you refering to axles? If so, do you mean he is putting a flat strip down the side of the axle shaft? This will tend to cause it to split lengthwise, although perhaps at higher stresses than necessary to cause "normal" breakage (I'd have to analyze it). If you mean he is keeping the diameter constant, then it will break (if it breaks) at the beginning of the splines. The axles DO flex and twist, probably more than we imagine. Generally, anything that interupts the surface of the axle will cause some form of stress concentration. To avoid this at the splines, the axles are fatter there. It almost works. Changing to many smaller splines also reduces the stress concentration, although the 21-spline (if that's the correct number) shafts I've seen were slightly larger in diameter, which is an even better solution to breaking axles. Keep us appraised of his success. JohnO ------------------------------[ <- Message 27 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970306 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 1997 09:16:05 -0800 From: Uncle Roger <sinasohn@crl.com> Subject: Re: Webbery At 08:46 AM 3/5/97 -0800, Uncle Roger wrote: >Granville -- If you have some spare time, (I know you have tons! 8^) could >you take a look at some new web pages I've been working on for the LROA? Ack! Sorry folks! That was supposed to go to Granville only! Please disregard the whole thing! Sorry! --------------------------------------------------------------------- O- Uncle Roger "There is pleasure pure in being mad sinasohn@crl.com that none but madmen know." Roger Louis Sinasohn & Associates San Francisco, California http://www.crl.com/~sinasohn/ ------------------------------[ <- Message 28 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970306 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 05 Mar 1997 09:20:38 -0800 From: jouster@redm.primextech.com (John Ousterhout) Subject: vertical inertia reels Nate, et al: I'm using the inertia seatbelts from a Dodge Ramcharger (their small pickup). They mount vertically, and the buckle is on the end of a steel cable, making it easy to connect to the chassis in a convenient position. It also has a "tilt" lock that can be annoying because you can't pull the belt out if the vehicle is tilted too far. OTOH, it holds you quite well if you already have it on and the vehicle tilts. JohnO ------------------------------[ <- Message 29 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970306 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: NADdMD@aol.com Date: Wed, 5 Mar 1997 12:23:01 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: vertical inertia reels In a message dated 97-03-05 12:21:36 EST, you write: << Nate, et al: I'm using the inertia seatbelts from a Dodge Ramcharger (their small pickup). They mount vertically, and the buckle is on the end of a steel cable, making it easy to connect to the chassis in a convenient position. It also has a "tilt" lock that can be annoying because you can't pull the belt out if the vehicle is tilted too far. OTOH, it holds you quite well if you already have it on and the vehicle tilts. JohnO >> Thanks for the info! I'm gonna check them out. Nate ------------------------------[ <- Message 30 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970306 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Alan_Richer/CAM/Lotus@lotus.com Date: Wed, 5 Mar 1997 12:25:25 -0400 Subject: Re: seat belts Re: vertical mounting: Not sure what you mean, but the reel exit is straight up, with a bolt through the bottom into a bracket paralleling the doorpost. Take a look at the pickup diagram for seatbelts in the RN catalogue... ajr ------------------------------[ <- Message 31 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970306 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: C.J.Short@ste0418.wins.icl.co.uk Date: Wed, 5 Mar 1997 17:39:55 +0000 Subject: RE: Custom door tops (was Re: Anybody need ... door?) Who and where are these local chaps and how much are they selling these windows for? Are they making centre windows for LWB Station Wagons also? Very interested so any further info will be gratefully received. Thanks. CJS (LWB SIII SW) ------------------------------[ <- Message 32 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970306 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 1997 12:28:45 -0800 From: Uncle Roger <sinasohn@crl.com> Subject: Re: Anybody need a '58 Series II station-wagon door? (Boston, M At 08:52 AM 3/5/97 -0500, you wrote: >Ron Franklin >'59 109 w/one piece doors >'60 88 w/two piece doors FWIW, my '59 109" has two piece doors. --------------------------------------------------------------------- O- Uncle Roger "There is pleasure pure in being mad sinasohn@crl.com that none but madmen know." Roger Louis Sinasohn & Associates San Francisco, California http://www.crl.com/~sinasohn/ ------------------------------[ <- Message 33 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970306 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: ASFCO@worldnet.att.net Subject: Dual brake system Date: Wed, 5 Mar 1997 19:52:28 +0000 Could someone please foreward that rather long post regarding the dual brake system to me.. Everything in the in box was lost here thanks Rgds Steve Bradke 96 Discovery WA2GMC 72 S lll 88 (For Sale) 68 S lla 88 ------------------------------[ <- Message 34 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970306 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 05 Mar 1997 17:41:53 -0500 From: "Benjamin G. Newman,MD" <medone@iag.net> Subject: East Coast Rover..........here we go again!!!....delete now if not interested Dear Henry Stinson, I can't write anything about ECR because I am taking them to Court. Benjamin G. Newman ------------------------------[ <- Message 35 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970306 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: LSheeley@aol.com Date: Wed, 5 Mar 1997 18:04:17 -0500 (EST) Subject: Defender 110 Long-term Porsche nut takes on recent Anglophile leanings. I have owned a 60 356B Porsche for many years and my college junior son has a 59 we are restoring. In October my wife and I took a 9-day 25th wedding anniversary trip to England and Scotland and I now have a fresh appreciation for British cars. We are going back to Scotland next year for 2 weeks. While I owned a 66 MGB in college, I never thought I would be thinking about buying a British car. I bought a monograming sewing machine to do hats, shirts, etc. last year to do VW and Porsche events and dragged son along for help. We next tried British Car shows and had a ball. He decided a Land Rover would be the thing to drive. Now he has his 87 924S Porsche for sale and wants a Defender. He wants 1990 to 92 with AC, sunroof, green, blue or red, left-hand drive. A local car buyer/seller told us there is a guy in Washington DC who imports late model 110 Defenders from the mother country. Does anyone know a name, address, phone number, etc. for this guy? Mom says she will spring for up to $10--$12,000 including the proceeds from the sale of the 924S to buy the Defender and get her only child into a bigger, safer car. Anybody out there got the answer? Lynn Sheeley Knoxville, Tennessee Leaning toward Anglo-phile D.B.A. Lynn's ABCs--custom car clothes for the discriminating car nut. ------------------------------[ <- Message 36 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970306 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: WJMcD@aol.com Date: Wed, 5 Mar 1997 18:23:52 -0500 (EST) Subject: Surrender After 6 month of attempting to join the ranks of the LRO, I am surrendering. Some of you may have read my sad tale of purchasing my '69 109' back in October, only to have the layshaft break in two, then the motor succomb to a broken rod and cracked block. I have driven the vehicle a total of 5 hours. That was the length of the trip from the docks in Virginia to my home. Since, it has sat in my drive mocking me with each passing day. I've been unable to acquire a replacement motor at a cost I can afford and therefore,have decided to sell the lump for what I can get. Actually, she's a beauty, saving the whole under her bonnet (only to be rivaled by the one under mine). I'd be interested in any offers out there. Email for more info. Tearfully, Bill McDonald Soon to be a short lived former LRO ------------------------------[ <- Message 37 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970306 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 1997 19:31:35 -0500 (EST) From: cmw@tiac.net (Christopher Weinbeck) Subject: Just do it??? This has got to be a joke, right?? >Subject: Re: East Coast Rover Co. >Don`t open this can of worms, everyone`s finally stopped posting negative [ truncated by list-digester (was 6 lines)] >thing emails :-( ). Just do it and tell us how it goes. > Rgds, Rick "Just do it"??? Good idea, don't ask for advice before spending $5000+. "[T]ell us how it goes"?? What, so people can complain about "posting negative comments"??? I think that's rather inconsistant. I just finished posting PRIVATELY to two people who requested information. But, since I'm here I will mention that, despite promises made here I still have recieved NOTHING from East Coast Rover Co. Chris ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Christopher Weinbeck Office Logic, Inc. V (508) 392-0288 _______ 7 Littleton Road F (508) 692-0897 |__][_[_\__ Westford, MA 01886 Computerization for |___\_|_]__] the healthcare (o) (o) '69 109" RHD OD 2.6 Dormobile professional Ask me about East Coast Rover Co. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ------------------------------[ <- Message 38 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970306 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 05 Mar 1997 15:46:21 -0900 From: "Deanna D. Sitter" <lani@Alaska.NET> Subject: low transfercase gears Clayton Kirkwood asked about lower t-case gears for his '59 88. Actually the earlier Rovers have a very respectable 2.888:1 low range reduction. Starting with the suffix C gearboxes, which I believe started about '64 or '65, the low range was changed to 2.35:1. However, the earlier transmissions have a less desireable 2.996:1 first gear as opposed to the 3.6:1 first gear in the suffix C and later transmissions. Sooo....If an early T-case is mated to a later Tranny the overall reduction in first gear low range will change from aprox. 40.7: to just under 49:1, plus the lower first gear is nicer for general drivability in high range. It's an easy upgrade if your replacing a gearbox on an earlier Rover and have several to choose from. If you have a later IIA or III all you need to find is a Suffix B intermediate gear and a Suffix A or B low gear to swap into your existing T-case. Tim Sitter Peters Creek, AK. ------------------------------[ <- Message 39 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970306 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 1997 17:17:38 -0800 (PST) From: "James M. Davis" <jamesd@baker.cnw.com> Subject: For Sale 1966 IIA 109 3dr For Sale: 1966 IIA 109 3dr. 26,000 miles since frame off. Professionally rebuilt. All genuine L.R. parts. Gas engine rebuilt, .020 oversize pistons, rings, new oil pump, bearings, cam, water pump, valves ground. New starter, generator, fuel pump, distributor, rebuilt solex carb. Frame has 3 new outriggers, and new galvanized rear member, 4 new H/D springs. Front axle rebuilt, new swivel balls and king pins. New rear diff and axles. New brakes, including lines. New Fairey O/D. Full length hard top. Body straight and in primer. $8900. Jim Davis Seattle 206-782-8599 ------------------------------[ <- Message 40 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970306 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 1997 20:31:56 -0500 (EST) From: rovah@agate.net (John Cassidy) Subject: Downeast Land Rover Club accepting memberships Just a quick note to those I don't have on my mailing list... The Downeast Land Rover Club invites all Land Rover owners to join! We are a club that will be serving owners/enthusiasts mainly in Maine and New Hampshire. Please refer to the URL for the club page in my signature for more information! Cheers! John John Cassidy Bangor, Maine USA The Downeast Rover Club, <http://www.agate.net/~rovah/> X0 of the V(irtual)MFA 509th COUGARS/Flying GSC's F/A-18 Hornet game 2 Wheels: Ducati M900, Velocette Thruxton, Moto Morini 350S 4 Wheels: 1995 Discovery, 1987 Range Rover-"Smedley," 1966 Series IIA 88", 1974 Series III 88"-"SWAMBO" ------------------------------[ <- Message 41 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970306 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: BAnder4294@aol.com Date: Wed, 5 Mar 1997 22:12:00 -0500 (EST) Subject: Take Me off the list!!! Where did all this come from? Please send no more e-mails to this address. ------------------------------[ <- Message 42 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970306 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 05 Mar 1997 22:12:26 -0500 From: Shaun Oriold <Soriold@worldchat.com> Subject: Re: Defender 110 LSheeley@aol.com wrote: > Long-term Porsche nut takes on recent Anglophile leanings. I have owned a 60 > 356B Porsche for many years and my college junior son has a 59 we are [ truncated by list-digester (was 29 lines)] > Knoxville, Tennessee > Leaning toward Anglo-phile > D.B.A. Lynn's ABCs--custom car clothes for the discriminating car nut. What are you asking for the porsche? and what condition is it in? ------------------------------[ <- Message 43 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970306 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: NADdMD@aol.com Date: Wed, 5 Mar 1997 22:56:37 -0500 (EST) Subject: How do you tell if it's any good? Hi all, 1. Tappets and rollers: How do you tell if they're still good? 2. Tappet guides: Same question 3. Intake valves still look pretty good. How do I tell if they are? What's all this about grinding valves? 4. Can I just reuse the collarettes and retaining collars? 5. What IS the airspeed velocity of an unladen (assume African) swallow? Nate NADdMD@aol.com ------------------------------[ <- Message 44 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970306 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: BigAlSk8r@aol.com Date: Wed, 5 Mar 1997 22:58:19 -0500 (EST) Subject: LIFTING SERIES & DEFENDER WIND SCREEN HOWDY ! I'M NEW TO THE LIST AND TO THIS INTER NET THING BUT REALY ENJOY IT SO FAR , I HOPE YOU WILL BEAR W/ME AS I HAVE A FEW QUESTIONS REGUARDING SUSPENSION LIFT AS I WOULD LIKE AN EXTRA INCH OR TWO BETWEEN BELLE'S CROSS MEMBERS AND THOSE NASTY HARD THINGS, I'M CURRENTLY RUNNING 30 X 9.5 TIRES AND DONT CARE TO CHANGE TIRES/LOW GEAR RATIO ANY FURTHER {i.e. 7.5 X 16 TIRES } ANY SUGGESTIONS ? ALSO , I NEVER HEARD IF A DEFENDER WIND SCREEN WOULD WORK ON A SERIES , I'M VERY INTERESTED IN FINDING OUT AS I HAVE AN OLD TICKFORD SOFT TOP OFF MY NEIGBORS D-90 W/THE 2 REAR SECTIONS OF THE CAGE . SORRY IF THIS IS REDUNDANT , IF SO YOU CAN E-MAIL ME @ BIGALSK8R@AOL.COM THANKS , ALLAN 73'' S.3 88'' - "BELLE" AND 66" S.2 109" - "MATILDA" ------------------------------[ <- Message 45 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970306 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 05 Mar 1997 22:14:20 -0600 From: Grant Gryska <grant@mcs.net> Subject: Re: LIFTING SERIES & DEFENDER WIND SCREEN Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sorry, I am not sure. Thanks, Grant@mcs.net ------------13C228F2607D0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit ------------------------------[ <- Message 46 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970306 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Thu, 06 Mar 1997 06:48:12 +0200 From: Paul Oxley <paul@adventures.co.za> Subject: Re: Custom door tops (was Re: Anybody need ... door?) C.J.Short@ste0418.wins.icl.co.uk wrote: > Who and where are these local chaps and how much are they > selling these windows for? Are they making centre windows for [ truncated by list-digester (was 6 lines)] > LWB Station Wagons also? Very interested so any further info > will be gratefully received. Thanks. CJS (LWB SIII SW) Have a look at my web address. Local for me is South Africa. If this is stll a proposition for you I'll be glad to find out. Regards Paul Oxley http://www.adventures.co.za ------------------------------[ <- Message 47 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970306 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Thu, 06 Mar 1997 00:26:48 -0500 From: David Cockey <dcockey@tir.com> Subject: Re: Defender 110 Hope springs eternal. Father writes of son: > He wants 1990 to 92 with AC, sunroof, green, blue or red, left-hand drive. D110 was only sold in US in '93. Land Rovers (and any other vehicle not originally intended for the US market) have to be 25 years old to be legally imported. The very few exceptions won't apply. Check the LR FAQ, Part V at: http://www.off-road.com/LR_FAQ/ for an excellent discussion on importing LRs by Bill C. ------------------------------[ <- Message 48 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970306 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 1997 23:55:34 -0300 From: rover1@sky.net (Steve Paustian) Subject: Re: East Coast Rover Co. >>Hello >> Has anyone had any experience (good or bad) with the East Coast [ truncated by list-digester (was 14 lines)] >D90 SW >Keep the oily side down Jeez... I thought you guys woulda been all over this one, everyone had enough ECR bashing for awhile? Mr. Stinson, I've heard good and bad about East Coast Rover Co., mostly bad as of late, but I have no firsthand knowledge of them. They used to be on this list and were a great help in answering some technical questions and gave good sound advice. They had a couple of unhappy customers and everybody was talking about that for awhile. One day they unsubscribe from the list and I haven't heard much since then. Never pet a burning dog. Steve Paustian Flatland Rover Society ------------------------------[ <- Message 49 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970306 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 1997 00:04:27 -0300 From: rover1@sky.net (Steve Paustian) Subject: Re: LIFTING SERIES & DEFENDER WIND SCREEN >HOWDY ! I'M NEW TO THE LIST AND TO THIS INTER NET THING BUT REALY ENJOY IT SO >FAR , I HOPE YOU WILL BEAR W/ME AS I HAVE A FEW QUESTIONS REGUARDING [ truncated by list-digester (was 12 lines)] >THIS IS REDUNDANT , IF SO YOU CAN E-MAIL ME @ BIGALSK8R@AOL.COM THANKS , > ALLAN 73'' S.3 88'' - "BELLE" AND 66" S.2 109" - "MATILDA" To quote The Firesign Theatre: My friend say don't hear you, he can shout. or was that Cheech and Chong? Never pet a burning dog. Steve Paustian Flatland Rover Society ------------------------------[ <- Message 50 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970306 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 05 Mar 1997 22:12:01 -0800 From: Thomas Spoto <tspoto@az.com> Subject: Re: LIFTING SERIES & DEFENDER WIND SCREEN BigAlSk8r@aol.com wrote: > HOWDY ! I'M NEW TO THE LIST AND TO THIS INTER NET THING BUT REALY ENJOY IT SO > FAR , I HOPE YOU WILL BEAR W/ME AS I HAVE A FEW QUESTIONS REGUARDING [ truncated by list-digester (was 12 lines)] > THIS IS REDUNDANT , IF SO YOU CAN E-MAIL ME @ BIGALSK8R@AOL.COM THANKS , > ALLAN 73'' S.3 88'' - "BELLE" AND 66" S.2 109" - "MATILDA" Allan, Since you're new to "THIS INTER NET THING" one thing you might want to know is, leaving your keyboard in the Caps Lock position is considered bad form. It's referred to as shouting and is used for emphasis on a particular point. As far as suspension lifts go I have to beg off on that one. Both of mine run stock suspension. 30 x 9.50 x 15 on the 72 and 7.00R 15 on the 67. Tom 2 x 72 88's daily driver and it's friend 1 x 67 88 in the family since May 1975 mine from June 1976 ------------------------------[ <- Message 51 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970306 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 05 Mar 1997 22:26:28 -0500 From: David L Glaser <dlglaser@wam.umd.edu> Subject: Re: LIFTING SERIES & DEFENDER WIND SCREEN First let me say Hello to everyone. I'm new on the List, this is actually my first posting. I don'y know of any lift kits for Series LRs, but I read in an issue of LRW magazine that for a little extra lift (.75") you can use springs and shackels from a 109 High Capacity PU. But be warned, since the HC PU was designed to carry heavy loads it will give a very rough ride. The Defender windscreen should be a direct bolt-on. David L Glaser dlglaser@wam.umd.edu 1994 Discovery (La Ruta Maya #6) 1994 Teal Discovery ------------------------------[ <- Message 52 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970306 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Thu, 06 Mar 1997 08:36:25 +0200 From: Paul Oxley <paul@adventures.co.za> Subject: New Landy/BMW combo (the lunatics have taken over the asylum) Ya heard it here first! This mornings Star newspaper carries the report (scanned at hi-res for you at http://www.adventures.co.za/landy/news.htm , I hope you can read it) of the launch in SA of the Defender range equipped with the "new" BM 2.8 6cyl. Some "high"lights "maximum power is up from 100kW to 142kW over the V8, while there's an "improvement" [my emphasis] in torque from 253Nmat 2500r/min to 280Nm at 3950r/min." And so endeth the service. Friends are requested to send donations to the Preserve The Old Series Vehicles Fund in lieu of flowers. Regards Paul Oxley http://www.adventures.co.za ------------------------------[ <- Message 53 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970306 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Thu, 06 Mar 1997 08:48:04 +0200 From: Paul Oxley <paul@adventures.co.za> Subject: Re: East Coast Rover..........here we go again!!!....delete now if not interested Benjamin G. Newman,MD wrote: > Dear Henry Stinson, > I can't write anything about ECR because I am taking them to Court. > Benjamin G. Newman Look bud, I'm sure you're a very nice guy, but please don't post your dirty linen to the whole list if you only intend Henry Stinson to read it. I'm sure this will prompt a defensive response from ECR, and there we go again... Regards Paul Oxley http://www.adventures.co.za ------------------------------[ <- Message 54 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970306 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Subject: DEFENDER WIND SCREEN Date: Thu, 6 Mar 97 00:45:10 -0800 From: "G. Mugele" <mewgull@ix.netcom.com> David Glaser said: >The Defender windscreen should be a direct bolt-on. I believe this was in response to a query about using a Defender windscreen on a Series LR. Unless I'm misunderstanding the question, this is not a direct bolt-on nad not likely to work very well. The Defender windscreen is about 3 or 4 inches taller than the Series. One local chap (San Francisco Bay Area) has a nice modification to his late IIa. He has removed the center divider and uses a single pane for the whole frame. Even better: it maintains the original LR beauty and aerodynamic integrity :-) Cheers, Gerry Mugele Peat -'95 D90 SW 364/500 Gooey -'72 Series III 88 *** We face insuperable opportunities. --Pogo ------------------------------[ <- Message 55 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970306 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Thu, 06 Mar 1997 10:56:54 +0200 From: Paul Oxley <paul@adventures.co.za> Subject: Re: DEFENDER WIND SCREEN G. Mugele wrote: > David Glaser said: > >The Defender windscreen should be a direct bolt-on. [ truncated by list-digester (was 20 lines)] > Gooey -'72 Series III 88 > *** We face insuperable opportunities. --Pogo I agree, without extensive mods to the front of the roof it won't fit at all! The old two pane windscreen has a very distinct advantage also. If a stone smashes a pane its less than half the cost and effort to replace a single pane. Smaller panes are by definition stronger and more resistant to cracking from rattling and twisting than a single, big windscreen is. Etc, etc. Regards Paul Oxley http://www.adventures.co.za ------------------------------[ <- Message 56 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970306 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Thu, 06 Mar 1997 11:21:34 +0100 From: u930369@studbo.hit.no (Oystein Barane) subscribe list ------------------------------[ <- Message 57 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970306 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
END OF * LIST DIGEST Input: messages 56 lines 2324 [forwarded 178 whitespace 558] Output: lines 1720 [content 1018 forwarded 92 (cut 86) whitespace 525][ First Message | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970306 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Back | Forward | |
---|---|---|
Photos & text Copyright 1990-2011 Bill Caloccia, All rights reserved. Digest Messages Copyright 1990-2011 by the original poster or/and Bill Caloccia, All rights reserved.
|