[ First Message Last | Table of Contents | <- Digest -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
msg | Sender | lines | Subject |
1 | "Mark Gehlhausen" [Gehl@ | 20 | Assorted Questions |
2 | "Mark Gehlhausen" [Gehl@ | 9 | "Iron Duke" A Worthy Choice? |
3 | Alan_Richer/CAM/Lotus@lo | 14 | Re: "Iron Duke" A Worthy Choice? |
4 | Adrian Redmond [channel6 | 34 | Re: Diesel Oil pressure - what now |
5 | Adrian Redmond [channel6 | 37 | Re: Diesel oil pressure - forgot something |
6 | Alan_Richer/CAM/Lotus@lo | 18 | Re: Diesel oil pressure - Slippery references |
7 | Jonathan Watmough [jonw@ | 16 | Re: The Land Rover Owner Daily Digest |
8 | Jonathan Watmough [jonw@ | 16 | Re: The Land Rover Owner Daily Digest |
9 | Iwan Vosloo [ivosloo@cs. | 20 | Oil pressure guages (was: Re: Diesel oil pressure - forgot something) |
10 | "Adams, Bill" [badams@us | 15 | Oil pressure, or lack of it... |
11 | twakeman@scruznet.com (T | 18 | Re: "Iron Duke" A Worthy Choice? |
12 | dbobeck@ushmm.org | 13 | Re: SIII Clutch troubles on the way? |
13 | tchris@smart1.net (velar | 41 | Re: D90 SW |
14 | Keith Mohlenhoff [krm@nj | 13 | Interior spare tire holder |
15 | hstin@cts.com (Henry Sti | 18 | Series III |
16 | "Tom Gross [ESRI-Redland | 43 | Re: California smog and imported vehicles. |
17 | Adrian Redmond [channel6 | 64 | Help! 88" SIII Petrol in care! |
18 | kloeppej@ccmail.orst.edu | 50 | D09 SW Rear mud flap installation?????? |
19 | Peter Kutschera [peter@z | 17 | Re: sick starters and dead batteries |
20 | "G. Mugele" [mewgull@ix. | 20 | [not specified] |
21 | "G. Mugele" [mewgull@ix. | 31 | [not specified] |
22 | "Paul Gussack" [pcg@tenn | 22 | Chris Weinbeck (Registration) |
23 | "Mark Gehlhausen" [Gehl@ | 13 | Re: Assorted Questions |
24 | "Mark Gehlhausen" [Gehl@ | 13 | Re: Assorted Questions |
25 | Land_Rovers@learnlink.em | 17 | Re: Assorted Questions |
26 | Land_Rovers@learnlink.em | 19 | Re: "Iron Duke" A Worthy Choice? |
27 | frank01@postoffice.ptd.n | 21 | Re: Land Rovers in US market |
28 | Boris Brecelj [boris.bre | 25 | RE: Roof Racks |
29 | Ian Harper/Donna-Claire | 20 | Painting Birmabright |
30 | "neil warburton" [neilwa | 14 | "Storm" The facts |
31 | "Beckett, Ron" [rbeckett | 32 | Lizards 1, Highlanders 0 (Amended) |
32 | David Cockey [dcockey@ti | 23 | Re: Series III |
33 | Uncle Roger [sinasohn@cr | 30 | Re: Re[2]: First contact with strange life forms... |
34 | john hess [jfhess@wheel. | 41 | EPA answers? HAH! |
35 | "Charles F. Proctor" [Ch | 24 | RE: Used Scotty's adaptor wanted |
36 | NADdMD@aol.com | 31 | I HAVE HAD IT (valve removal) |
37 | twakeman@scruznet.com (T | 47 | Re: Painting Birmabright |
38 | twakeman@scruznet.com (T | 23 | Re: IIA Panel Key Question |
39 | "Charles F. Proctor" [Ch | 40 | RE: Permission for posting |
40 | "Beckett, Ron" [rbeckett | 37 | CB40 Highlander |
41 | Uncle Roger [sinasohn@cr | 18 | Re: "Iron Duke" A Worthy Choice? |
42 | Ketil Kirkerud [ketilk@a | 40 | Re: I HAVE HAD IT (valve removal) |
43 | Ketil Kirkerud [ketilk@a | 13 | [not specified] |
44 | marsden@digicon-egr.co.u | 13 | Re: CB40 Highlander |
45 | Ross [fax.rescue@hunterl | 40 | Re: Land Rovers in US market |
From: "Mark Gehlhausen" <Gehl@sphinx.crane.navy.mil> Date: Mon, 3 Mar 1997 06:57:15 -500 Subject: Assorted Questions LR List, What can I find out from the following Comm. No. 24414566B. Does a 109 IIA pickup have a fixed cab/bed bulkhead. I always thought this to be an unboltable panel, but I saw one that looks quite permanent. It was not vertical but slanted forward at the bottom. It appeared the galvanized bed top trim wrapped around the front of the bed. Is there a LR with such a removable panel? Tires fitted: Front: LT245/75R16 M+S LoadC Rear: LT235/85R16 (Cooper Discoverers) I like a narrow tall tire. Can anyone recommend either of the two above tires? Thanks! Mark ------------------------------[ <- Message 2 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970304 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Mark Gehlhausen" <Gehl@sphinx.crane.navy.mil> Date: Mon, 3 Mar 1997 07:47:20 -500 Subject: "Iron Duke" A Worthy Choice? Is the "ron Duke" 4 cylinder engine a good replacement choice for a 109? I believe this is a GM/Pontiac unit? Given that lack of originality is not an issue, what other engines should I consider? Mark ------------------------------[ <- Message 3 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970304 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Alan_Richer/CAM/Lotus@lotus.com Date: Mon, 3 Mar 1997 07:58:40 -0400 Subject: Re: "Iron Duke" A Worthy Choice? >From what i've heard, it's damn near a marriage made in heaven. More power, easily available parts, and drops on the stock mounts with the right adapter ring. Not my cup of tea, but if you want to swap out that Godawful Mercedes Diesel thing you've been on about, it's the way to go. aj"My .02 worth..."r ------------------------------[ <- Message 4 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970304 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Mon, 03 Mar 1997 14:06:30 -0800 From: Adrian Redmond <channel6@post2.tele.dk> Subject: Re: Diesel Oil pressure - what now Iwan Vosloo wrote: > All, > the response to my question about oil pressure in different situations [ truncated by lro-digester (was 31 lines)] > Me 40-45 45 15 > - Iwan Vosloo > ( '75 SIII 88" Diesel ) Glad you raised the question Iwan! I don't know the answer either, so I am looking forward to the hopefully forthcoming replies and theories! Maybe you should just drive? Dunno, always nice to know the answer - if there is one? Good luck - keep us posted! -- Adrian Redmond --------------------------------------------------- CHANNEL 6 TELEVISION DENMARK (Adrian Redmond) Foerlevvej 6 Mesing DK-8660 Skanderborg Denmark --------------------------------------------------- telephone (office) +45 86 57 22 66 telephone (home) +45 86 57 22 64 telefacsimile / data +45 76 57 24 46 mobile GSM (EFP unit) +45 40 74 75 64 mobile GSM (admin) +45 40 50 22 66 mobile NMT +45 30 86 75 66 e-mail channel6@post2.tele.dk HoTMaiL (www.e-mail) channel6denmark@hotmail.com --------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------[ <- Message 5 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970304 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Mon, 03 Mar 1997 14:10:37 -0800 From: Adrian Redmond <channel6@post2.tele.dk> Subject: Re: Diesel oil pressure - forgot something Mike Rooth wrote: > but I just noticed something. Jack & my oil pressures behaved more or > less the same and was lower than the others. But I just remembered that [ truncated by lro-digester (was 19 lines)] > Cheers > Mike Rooth My 88 has an original Smiths electrical oil pressure guage - the 109 has an aftermarket (Equus) electrical guage. This could be a difference between electrical and mechanical measurement - as the electrical sensor could change resistance when it gets warm (which presumably it does, being beside the motor?) Could also be that the voltage stabilisor doesn't (stabilise)? Any thoughts anyone? -- Adrian Redmond --------------------------------------------------- CHANNEL 6 TELEVISION DENMARK (Adrian Redmond) Foerlevvej 6 Mesing DK-8660 Skanderborg Denmark --------------------------------------------------- telephone (office) +45 86 57 22 66 telephone (home) +45 86 57 22 64 telefacsimile / data +45 76 57 24 46 mobile GSM (EFP unit) +45 40 74 75 64 mobile GSM (admin) +45 40 50 22 66 mobile NMT +45 30 86 75 66 e-mail channel6@post2.tele.dk HoTMaiL (www.e-mail) channel6denmark@hotmail.com --------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------[ <- Message 6 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970304 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Alan_Richer/CAM/Lotus@lotus.com Date: Mon, 3 Mar 1997 08:14:27 -0400 Subject: Re: Diesel oil pressure - Slippery references When confronted by a situation like this, it's oftentimes my habit to go find a stable reference that isn't indebted to Joe Lucas or the like. What 'd recommend here if anyone is concerned overly by this is to go find a garage with a test gauge, check THAT with compressed air, then hook the thing up and see what it reads against the original gauge. Been there, done this...bought a liquid-filled gauge specifically for this type of task, as a matter of fact. For the $25 in gauge and fittings it was worth it to have a portable reference. aj"I love standards.....8*) "r ------------------------------[ <- Message 7 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970304 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Mon, 03 Mar 1997 13:08:50 +0000 From: Jonathan Watmough <jonw@aberdeen.geoquest.slb.com> Subject: Re: The Land Rover Owner Daily Digest unsubscribe lro-digest -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Jonathan Watmough - Project Support Engineer IIII PPPPPP MMM MMM Integrated Project Management Division II PP PP MM M M MM Schlumberger E.P.S. (UK) Ltd II PP PP MM M MM Schlumberger House, Minto Avenue, II PPPPP MM MM Altens, Aberdeen, UK. II PP MM MM Tel: +44-1224-423596 Fax: +44-1224-423501 IIII PPPP MMMM MMMM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------[ <- Message 8 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970304 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Mon, 03 Mar 1997 13:08:50 +0000 From: Jonathan Watmough <jonw@aberdeen.geoquest.slb.com> Subject: Re: The Land Rover Owner Daily Digest unsubscribe lro-digest -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Jonathan Watmough - Project Support Engineer IIII PPPPPP MMM MMM Integrated Project Management Division II PP PP MM M M MM Schlumberger E.P.S. (UK) Ltd II PP PP MM M MM Schlumberger House, Minto Avenue, II PPPPP MM MM Altens, Aberdeen, UK. II PP MM MM Tel: +44-1224-423596 Fax: +44-1224-423501 IIII PPPP MMMM MMMM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------[ <- Message 9 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970304 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Mon, 03 Mar 1997 16:14:53 +0200 From: Iwan Vosloo <ivosloo@cs.up.ac.za> Subject: Oil pressure guages (was: Re: Diesel oil pressure - forgot something) Mike Rooth asked: > Personally I would rather trust a mechanical gauge than an > electrical one,but I wasnt aware that Land Rover fitted a > pressure gauge as standard.Was this an original fitment? I believe the Smiths electrical guages are original equipment (fitted to export models like mine?). However I have removed mine when it stopped working and fitted an aftermarket mechanical one because so many people would also "rather trust a mechanical guage". All the fittings needed to fit the smiths guage's sensor as well as the oil pressure light sensor are standard equipment too. - Iwan Vosloo ( '75 SIII 88" Diesel ) ------------------------------[ <- Message 10 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970304 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 1997 9:26:39 -0500 From: "Adams, Bill" <badams@usia.gov> Subject: Oil pressure, or lack of it... I can't imagine that the difference between mechanical and electric guages would result in such a great disparity. Mine is mechanical BTW. I would suspect that you have a wussy relief spring or at the worst, worn out vanes. In any case, it's easy enough to drop the pan and remove the oil pump for repair, a weekend project at worst. Bill Adams 3D Artist/Animator '66 Land Rover S2A 109 Diesel Station Wagon: "Practicing the ancient oriental art of ren-ching" ------------------------------[ <- Message 11 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970304 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 1997 06:49:15 -0800 From: twakeman@scruznet.com (TeriAnn Wakeman) Subject: Re: "Iron Duke" A Worthy Choice? At 7:47 AM 3/3/97 -0500, Mark Gehlhausen wrote: >Is the "ron Duke" 4 cylinder engine a good replacement choice for a >109? Well that depends upon what you want. The Chevy 4 is lighter than the Land Rover 2-1/4L petrol. It has more power and gets better petrol milage. And you do not need to modify your frame or engine bay. With Scotty's adaptor its about the easiest swap that you can make. Of course the purists would hate it and say you should have purchased a Blazer. TeriAnn Wakeman "Large format photographers look Santa Cruz California at the world upside down and twakeman@scruznet.com backwards" ------------------------------[ <- Message 12 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970304 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: dbobeck@ushmm.org Date: Mon, 03 Mar 97 09:46:41 EST Subject: Re: SIII Clutch troubles on the way? >>yesterday my clutch suddenly started behaving weird: >>It still drives though and the problem does not seem to be increasing. Check the nuts on the pushrod in the master cylinder, they may have come loose. DaveB. ------------------------------[ <- Message 13 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970304 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: tchris@smart1.net (velardi, Theron) Subject: Re: D90 SW Date: Mon, 3 Mar 1997 09:41:54 -0500 Yes if anyone happens to come across a 1997 Def. 90 in yellow or white in New England I'd apreceate word of it! thank Chris ---------- > From: Beckett, Ron <rbeckett@nibupad.telstra.com.au> > To: Land Rover Network <lro@playground.sun.com>; RRO List [ truncated by lro-digester (was 8 lines)] > Date: Monday, March 03, 1997 10:27 PM > Boy, If David thought this was clutter, I'd hate to think what he thought > about my mistake in posting the virus info. How long did it take to down > load Keiths message? 1 second, 10 seconds, 30 seconds? It was less than > 1000 characters long. Some signature files of pix of Landies etc are nearly > as long. I usually call in from home to my company's mail server to get > this mail. For me that is a trunk call. Not a cheap or, in some countries, > free local call. > It doesn't worry me about these entries. I live 10,000 miles away so I <rro@playground.sun.com> am > certainly not going to go for a spin in them (I'd like to). > Unlike Australia, Defenders are somewhat thinner on the ground in the USA <rro@playground.sun.com> so > if one becomes available there just may be a buyer on the list who is > looking. Keep 'em coming, Keith. [ truncated by lro-digester (was 16 lines)] > >On Fri, 28 Feb 1997, Keith W. Cooper wrote: > >> There is a beautiful brand new Red '97 D90 Station Wagon sitting on our > >> local Land Rover dealer's lot. Just for kicks, I took it for a spin > [ truncated by lro-digester (was 30 lines)] ------------------------------[ <- Message 14 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970304 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Mon, 03 Mar 1997 09:50:38 -0500 From: Keith Mohlenhoff <krm@nj.paradyne.com> Subject: Interior spare tire holder Mail Delivery Subsystem wrote: > The original message was received at Sun, 2 Mar 1997 17:31:50 -0500 > Hello; > I have installed a fold and tumble seat in my 88" using [ truncated by lro-digester (was 17 lines)] > 63 IIA 109 2.25D 5 Door SW > 71 IIA 88 2.25P 3 Door HT ------------------------------[ <- Message 15 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970304 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 1997 07:43:05 -0800 (PST) From: hstin@cts.com (Henry Stinson) Subject: Series III Hello, Can anyone direct me in my search for a Series III 109 3 door with tropical roof? I would prefer a petrol model that has been rebuilt using a new Galvanized frame. I am presently in San Diego CA so one already smogged and in state would be preferable. It appears the Series 3 109's were never imported by Rover for the US market. Can anyone on the list tell me the number of Series III 109's in the US? I am more interested in a vehicles condition then its rarity. Is a Salisbury axle conversion common on IIA 109's? I would be interested in such a vehicle also. Thanks in advance for any direction! Henry Stinson hstin@cts.com ------------------------------[ <- Message 16 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970304 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 1997 09:13:37 -0800 From: "Tom Gross [ESRI-Redlands]" <tgross@esri.com> Subject: Re: California smog and imported vehicles. Hello, I just wanted to clarify my statement about Calif smog tests. I see that my fellow Dormobiler, John Hess, thought I might be saying that a vehicle imported into Calif had to meet CURRENT standards. That's not so. They only have to meet the standards for the year of the vehicle. So, a 1967 vehicle has to meet the '67 emissions standards, which as John says are 700 max ppm for HC. I forget what they are for CO. A tune up, oil change and screwing the idle mixture down to just richer than a lean miss should suffice for most. I can even get my '68 VW with a 2400 cc engine to pass, and I have to put all the original smog equipment on it. I just had my '67 NADA tested. John is correct in saying that there were no standards in the smog test computer for '67 6-cyl Land Rovers, but that there were for 1968. There are two parts to a Calif smog test. One, the vehicle has to meet a visual inspection. That means that all the smog equipment listed for it must be present. Whether or not it works is not usually determined by the inspector. It just has to be physically present. Second, the vehicle has to meet the emissions standards for that year. All this is dependent on the person you take it to for the test. Calif tests are done by licensed mechanics at private garages. Sometimes they fail to notice that something is missing, but usually they are strict about the visual test. If they cannot find the specs for a vehicle, then you might have to take it to a referee station. These folks are very picky, but they usually will only look to see that equipment is present. For instance, when I took my VW to the referee, it was trying to idle along with the single barrel carb and its 280 degree cam. They still passed it. For John and future tests, I'd suggest doing what a former owner of my Rover did. Put a small catalytic converter in the exhaust system. I don't think inspectors care if you have too much smog stuff, besides they aren't going to be looking for something underneath the car that isn't on the specs. Mine passed with a HydroCarbon reading of about 150 ppm, and I'm still trying to figure out how to make that SU carb work right. Tom Gross ------------------------------[ <- Message 17 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970304 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Mon, 03 Mar 1997 18:30:50 -0800 From: Adrian Redmond <channel6@post2.tele.dk> Subject: Help! 88" SIII Petrol in care! Hi, I've got a rover-lodger at present - a somewhat decrepid but running 1973 SIII Petrol 88". It's owner, my friend took it from denmark to iceland, decided to stay there another year, but wanted to avoid the problems of permanent import, so a few days ago it arrived in a container and is now in care! All my understanding (!) of Land Rovers is based on diesel 2,25 SIII, so I was curious when I opened the bonnet - "Where's the motor?" I cried "what THAT?" I added. "Isn't there something missing?" I couldn't resist to wonder. Maybe the petrol version is so spacious, but I was surprised. Talking of Petrol - Eskild (that's it's name) drinks more petrol standing in a car park, than in the outside lane of the motorway - so i decided to check the tank ot this weekend. Same as the diesel - a tin box, double skinned at the bottom, with a fine sandwich of Icelandic lava dust and rust between the skins - seperated the two, and found the holes.... lots of them.... the tank was serving as some sort of filter for removing rust from the påetrol, before spewing the filtered octane into the gutter. Solved that, rebuilt the tank, liberal coats of "Chemical metal" and rust paint, black paint, and the trusty silicone mastic before fitting tank again. Repainted the frame around the tank, a few outriggers, and for good measure painted the front end while I was waiting for the rest to dry. A complete attack of shipfitters disease set in, now its well on the way to a rebuild! But I need some advice about tuning the petrol engine before I start it up again - what is the best method for tuning the solex (square casting) carb, and what else should I check. I'm not running Eskild in ready for Paris Dakar or LeMans, just want to keep him in good, albeit rusty form, for the next year - give him a run now and again, and keep him well. Can any petrol owners offer any words of advice. And where is the motor? :-) Thanks - apologies for the long-winded outburst but petrol is new to me! -- Adrian Redmond --------------------------------------------------- CHANNEL 6 TELEVISION DENMARK (Adrian Redmond) Foerlevvej 6 Mesing DK-8660 Skanderborg Denmark --------------------------------------------------- telephone (office) +45 86 57 22 66 telephone (home) +45 86 57 22 64 telefacsimile / data +45 76 57 24 46 mobile GSM (EFP unit) +45 40 74 75 64 mobile GSM (admin) +45 40 50 22 66 mobile NMT +45 30 86 75 66 e-mail channel6@post2.tele.dk HoTMaiL (www.e-mail) channel6denmark@hotmail.com --------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------[ <- Message 18 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970304 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 1997 09:33:27 -0800 From: kloeppej@ccmail.orst.edu (John A. Kloepper) Subject: D09 SW Rear mud flap installation?????? I purchased a set of mud flaps for my D90. The fronts went on No sweat, partially because they came with instructions and hardware. The rear flaps although they look like a real no-brainer are causing me some concern. Because they came as individual components and not a kit like the fronts were I am with out mounting hardware or instructions. I can live with out the hardware but the lack of instruction worries me. I need a slight clue as to how to mount them to my vehicle. There are 5 holes drilled in the mounting bracket as well as a slot in the end of the bracket. Three of the holes are for attaching the actual flap to the bracket. It looks like the hole on the end which is actually drilled through an angled piece welded onto the bracket lines up with a hole in the frame. In addition it looks like the slot at the opposite end of the bracket fits over a ridge made between the black plastic wheel guard and the body. That's all I can figure out. It still leaves the mysterious other hole to be accounted for. I hope that hole plays some role in all of this as I am concerned about the movement of the bracket wearing on the body where it fits into the slot of the bracket. One last thing. If I've hit the nail on the head and this is all there is to mounting the bracket then what is the correct way to mount the bracket to the frame? It doesn't look like the hole in the frame is threaded. Would the best way to go be to thread that hole or to drive a rivnut in there? Any help is appreciated. -John ********************************************************************** John A. Kloepper Tele: 541.737.4039 3.1X CNA-CNE / 4.1X CNA Fax: 541.737.3462 Network Administrator Pager: 541.507.0335 College of Engineering E-Mail: kloeppej@ccmail.orst.edu Covell Hall 101 E-Mail: kloeppej@engr.orst.edu Oregon State University E-Mail: kloeppej@ucs.orst.edu Corvallis Oregon 97331 URL= HTTP://www.engr.orst.edu/~kloeppej "What the large print giveth the small print taketh away" ********************************************************************** ------------------------------[ <- Message 19 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970304 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 1997 19:21:33 +0100 From: Peter Kutschera <peter@zditf2.arcs.ac.at> Subject: Re: sick starters and dead batteries Hi Franz! I have 100Ah under the seat and with the turn of a key I can add another 88 Ah to help myself starting on a cold (below -10 C) morning. Works great. Peter -- Signature: Cogito ergo sum....I think.... Homepage: http://zditr1.arcs.ac.at/~peter Landrover: http://zditr1.arcs.ac.at/~peter/LR ------------------------------[ <- Message 20 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970304 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Subject: Re: Assorted Questions Date: Mon, 3 Mar 97 10:36:53 -0800 From: "G. Mugele" <mewgull@ix.netcom.com> Mark asked: >Does a 109 IIA pickup have a fixed cab/bed bulkhead. Yes as do all the 88's. The 4-door, of course, does not. I find it very handy in my Series III for attaching tie-downs and stacking cargo against it, particularly off-road. My D90 lacks this and I miss it. Gerry 95' D90 364/500 'Peat' 72' Series II 88 'Gooey' Cheers, Gerry Mugele Peat -'95 D90 SW 364/500 Gooey -'72 Series III 88 *** All things being equal, fat people use more soap. ------------------------------[ <- Message 21 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970304 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Subject: Re: California smog and imported vehicles. Date: Mon, 3 Mar 97 10:48:23 -0800 From: "G. Mugele" <mewgull@ix.netcom.com> Tom Gross had much to say about Calif Smog... And to enlighten the crowd here. There has been some discussion on this on the Mendo-Recce list. Everything Tom and John say is correct. However there is currently a bill in committee in the Calif Legislature...it needs your support! SB42 introduced by Quintin Kopp (yes, *that* Quintin Kopp) will revise the current smog testing requirements. Vehicles whose *model year* is 25 years old or older will be exempt from testing beginning 1 January 1998. The bill is now in committee and has no listed opposition so it looks good for passage. This means or antique hardware can still be driven in California. The unknown here is what this means to vintage vehicles coming in from other states or countries. Please, Californians, write or email your state senators. Gerry 95' D90 364/500 'Peat' 72' Series II 88 'Gooey' Cheers, Gerry Mugele Peat -'95 D90 SW 364/500 Gooey -'72 Series III 88 *** All things being equal, fat people use more soap. ------------------------------[ <- Message 22 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970304 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 1997 11:10:18 -0800 (PST) From: "Paul Gussack" <pcg@tennis.org> Subject: Chris Weinbeck (Registration) Chris, I had similar difficulty when I tried to get my rover registered in Tenn. (I finally ended up going to a tag and title office where they collect foreign license plates-they were so interested in getting one of my GB plates they didn't give me to much flack). I did have to sign an affidavit stating that to my knowledge all the information I presented was accurate. Maybe your tag and title has a similar arrangment. Eric Zipkin mentioned that GA has an easier process, and involves a little buying and selling arrangement here in the states. I would wonder about tax though as GA is fairly steep. If you need help let me know as I have family in GA. Eric may have more details. Paul G SIII SWB "Grendal" ------------------------------[ <- Message 23 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970304 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Mark Gehlhausen" <Gehl@sphinx.crane.navy.mil> Date: Mon, 3 Mar 1997 14:20:34 -500 Subject: Re: Assorted Questions Gerry, Thanks for your comments. I have always heard that all LRs are just overgrown meccano kits, so I assumed that the bulkhead was just bolted in. When I looked at one closely, it appeared rather, well, permanent. I often transport sails and spars, so I want all the length I can get. What a bummer. Mark ------------------------------[ <- Message 24 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970304 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Mark Gehlhausen" <Gehl@sphinx.crane.navy.mil> Date: Mon, 3 Mar 1997 14:20:34 -500 Subject: Re: Assorted Questions Gerry, Thanks for your comments. I have always heard that all LRs are just overgrown meccano kits, so I assumed that the bulkhead was just bolted in. When I looked at one closely, it appeared rather, well, permanent. I often transport sails and spars, so I want all the length I can get. What a bummer. Mark ------------------------------[ <- Message 25 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970304 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Land_Rovers@learnlink.emory.edu (Jack Walter) Date: Mon, 3 Mar 1997 17:02:57 -0500 Subject: Re: Assorted Questions the bulkhead on the 109 two doors is non-removable just as on the 88" series- this bulkhead is replaced by a 1" diameter tubular steel bar on the 109 station wagons to support the front seat backs. I have seen people trim the bulkead in hardtop 88's and 109's in order to accomodate reclining seats. you might also look at the late model D-90's to see how they eliminate the bulkhead. Ive seen the cooper tires and they look pretty good - don't know how they wear but the 235/85 is a good size for Land Rovers-you should have the same size at both ends though or your transfer case will suffer if you put it in 4wd. ------------------------------[ <- Message 26 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970304 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Land_Rovers@learnlink.emory.edu (Jack Walter) Date: Mon, 3 Mar 1997 17:12:19 -0500 Subject: Re: "Iron Duke" A Worthy Choice? Robert Davis in Norfolk Va is transplanting the marine (MercCruiser) version of this engine into Land Rovers- Much better fit with less clearance problems than the chevy six and it can be VERY fast - I drove one of Robert's conversions at the VA rally and I was impressed - looked almost stock too. Lots of parts available for this engine - Pontiac offered a performance parts catalog full of goodies for this motor when they were selling the Fiero (Barbie Ferrari) and many Chevy V-8 parts will migrate (valve train, rods, pistons, etc..) If you gotta swap - this is a good choice (much better than the dodge slant six I saw in a 109 SW at one of Steve Johnson's rallies) and nowhere near as bad at causing clearance problems as a V-8 or Chevy six conversion. ------------------------------[ <- Message 27 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970304 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 1997 18:18:16 -0800 (PST) From: frank01@postoffice.ptd.net (Frank W.C.) Subject: Re: Land Rovers in US market Ron, Sorry to hear about the gun-grabbers in your nation. I guess it isn't the hunter's paradise I thought it would be. Must stick to good old USA. And Africa. Keep those Land Rovers running though. Frank P.S. What's your benevolent Aussie gov. going to do when they can't stop the drug crazed criminals like we have in Philadelphia. A virus?? I hope it never happens! For God's sake amd yours. 1969 red Ser. IIa [ truncated by lro-digester (was 38 lines)] >series Tojos also rusting out there. >Ron (suitably chastened about posting the Word 6 virus messge) Beckett ------------------------------[ <- Message 28 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970304 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Boris Brecelj <boris.brecelj@kiss.uni-lj.si> Subject: RE: Roof Racks Date: Wed, 26 Feb 1997 17:50:33 +0100 ---------- From: Geoffrey Reynolds[SMTP:reynoldsg@tfn.com] Sent: 19. februar 1997 16:02 Subject: Roof Racks I'm seriously considering options 1, 4, and 5, but am currently leaning toward the ARB rack (option 4). I would appreciate any advice from others out there, especially if there's an option I have not listed (Thule and Yakima rack systems aren't options :)). Did you ever consider to have it custom built. I had mine custom built = from stainless steel and it was cheaper than anything else available on = market. around 450$ for full length D90 and it is modular, I can remove front, = rear, left or right side... Boris ------------------------------[ <- Message 29 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970304 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Mon, 03 Mar 1997 17:22:48 +0000 From: Ian Harper/Donna-Claire McLeod <tantramar@golden.net> Subject: Painting Birmabright Is there any disadvantage to not painting the Birmabright and leaving it silver? I'm refurbishing my S1 and it looks so nice (the parts that have the paint off already) and also that way I don't have to commit to a colour!!! Is it more likely to corrode without paint, or is it purely cosmetic. And, if I do take off all the paint, can I damage the aluminum by taking it off woth a wire brush(on a drill)? Also, the top of the rad is a beautiful brass colour now that it's stripped down, and I'd like to leave it like that....... -- Ian Harper/Donna Claire McLeod http://www.golden.net/~tantramar Tantramar House Bed and Breakfast Stratford, Ontario Phone(519) 273-7771 Fax (519) 273-3993 ------------------------------[ <- Message 30 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970304 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "neil warburton" <neilwarburton@enterprise.net> Subject: "Storm" The facts Date: Mon, 3 Mar 1997 21:07:01 -0000 Hi All. Well for Mark Ritter's information I know for a fact that the Storm engine is a totaly new unit being designed in house at Solihull.If he thinks he know more than someone that is working on the project I won't bother to post anymore news on it. I will just leave it to him. Yours Disapointedly Wrecker ------------------------------[ <- Message 31 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970304 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Beckett, Ron" <rbeckett@nibupad.telstra.com.au> Subject: Lizards 1, Highlanders 0 (Amended) Date: Tue, 04 Mar 97 10:47:00 EST OOPS! my comment should have read : "Our Australian goannas AREN'T quite as big!" Sorry if I've given a false impression of the size of our goannas. Ron From: Daniel McDonough wrote: >If those lizards are anything like what I have in my front yard >(see http://www.cs.unm.edu/~mcdonoug), I would want to run off >the highway too! By heck, I've had a look and I would, too! Our Australian goannas are quite as big! Regards, Ron Beckett Editor, Hillman Owners Club of Australia Newsletter '87 Range Rover '71 Hillman Hunter Royal 660 (See pix at http://www.brigadoon.com/~craigb/hillman/hunter.html '67 Hillman Gazelle ------------------------------[ <- Message 32 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970304 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Mon, 03 Mar 1997 19:10:58 -0500 From: David Cockey <dcockey@tir.com> Subject: Re: Series III > Can anyone direct me in my search for a Series III 109 3 door with > tropical roof? I would prefer a petrol model that has been rebuilt using a [ truncated by lro-digester (was 8 lines)] > condition then its rarity. Is a Salisbury axle conversion common on IIA > 109's? I would be interested in such a vehicle also. After the NADA 109s in '67 only 88s were exported to the US. Since SIIIs are not yet 25 years old, the only SIII 109s legally in the US would be any imported as grey-market vehicles prior to '91 or so. An excellent source of information is the "Frequently Asked Questions" at: http://www.off-road.com/LR_FAQ/ For sale and wanted listings at "The Land Rover Exchange" at: http://www.lrx.com/ Also check with LR specialists who usually know of LRs for sale. Regards, David Cockey ------------------------------[ <- Message 33 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970304 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 1997 19:13:03 -0800 (PST) From: Uncle Roger <sinasohn@crl.com> Subject: Re: Re[2]: First contact with strange life forms... At 08:09 AM 2/28/97 -0400, you wrote: >Re: 5-year-old: >Do yourself a favor......don't. Oh, I don't know... >Speaking as one who tried that trick more than > once, you'll either never get to pay attention to > what's going on, or the 5-year-old will be driving >off in someone's 88 when you're not paying >attention.....8*) Took my 2-yr-old niece to the LR photo shoot a week ago. She had a blast. She got to sit in Brad Blevins' Sagecoach and "drive" a "landwover". She got to play with (and keep -- I let it roll off the roof of Rachel's car and busted the winch) one of my toy Land Rovers. She got to meet lots of new people; She had a blast. Of course, she's completely LR crazy and always wants to "see landwover?" Her poor parents... 8^) --------------------------------------------------------------------- O- Uncle Roger "There is pleasure pure in being mad sinasohn@crl.com that none but madmen know." Roger Louis Sinasohn & Associates San Francisco, California http://www.crl.com/~sinasohn/ ------------------------------[ <- Message 34 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970304 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 1997 20:07:36 -0700 From: john hess <jfhess@wheel.dcn.davis.ca.us> Subject: EPA answers? HAH! about a BMW diesel in a rover, Sandy Grice surmised: anything more complicated than dropping the damned thing in. Then again, > we're dealing with Auntie Rover with their legendary upper management.... that was commented on: It's not quite that simple. Vehicles are "EPA-approved", powertrains are not and to muddle the picture more, I add: Actually, it's not THAT simple. In California, An ENGINE has to be EPA approved to put in an emissions controlled automobile. Emissions controlled automobile being slang for a "car". But that includes Land Rovers and light trucks (which includes full size ford and chevy trucks) but excludes BIG trucks and commercial delivery type trucks. Thus, the nissan diesel and iveco diesel and mitsubishi diesels are approved for delivery trucks, but not for putting in your rover. Important note: just because your car/truck/land rover doesn't need a smog certificate every two years doesn't mean that you can LEGALLY put any engine you want into in. You still are supposed to put in unapproved engines. I have spoken to a few LRNA folks and have yet to get anyone of them to say anything positive about a diesel coming to the US. OTOH, I have emailed with a man living in the US who received a letter from solihull saying that LR (UK) was working on a kit to put 300 tdis in discoveries and it would be ready in oct 1996. Also, in speaking to CA officials, they don't know what engines are approved! Don't know, can't tell. They fully expect that if I want to change an engine, I will check with the manufacturer and get a letter saying the engine is approved. oh well. That's all I know. John F Hess 1968 Land Rover Dormobile "Elvis" jfhess@wheel.dcn.davis.ca.us 1984 Mazda GLC "Mazda box" dormobile homepage: 1960 swb pu "Stubby" (actually Katherine's) http://wheel.dcn.davis.ca.us/~jfhess/homepage.html ------------------------------[ <- Message 35 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970304 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 97 00:15:20 UT From: "Charles F. Proctor" <CharlesFProctor@msn.com> Subject: RE: Used Scotty's adaptor wanted Call me with your tel # and when I speak to Robert Davis in VA next time , I'll ask him if he has one - I just sold one. Charlie 508-987-2626 ---------- From: car4doc Sent: Sunday, March 02, 1997 11:15 AM Subject: Used Scotty's adaptor wanted Hi All, I know that this is like looking for a used Overdrive. However some LR's go from modified back to stock. Someone may have what I am looking for. I am looking for a used Scottys adaptor which would help my project to install a larger engine on a budget. If you have one please let me know what you want for it off of the list. Thanks for the help. -- Rob Davis_chicago ------------------------------[ <- Message 36 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970304 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: NADdMD@aol.com Date: Mon, 3 Mar 1997 23:05:20 -0500 (EST) Subject: I HAVE HAD IT (valve removal) THAT'S IT I'VE HAD IT!!! I have tried for a week to remove the old valves from the head. The f***in' inner collarette halves won't come free from the outer ring (little ring on exhaust and big ring on the intake side). I have tried carb cleaner, WD-40, cleaning with petrol on a cloth.... tonight I tried compressing the spring and tapping with a punch around the outer ring AND I ENDED UP BENDING MY F***ING VALVE SPRING COMPRESSOR! I was about to cut the upper bits off with the reciprocating saw (how I spell relief) when the thought of safety wear vaguely entered my mind. Should I wear: a. safety goggles b. full face motorcycle helmet c. kevlar vest d. catcher's cup e. all the above Has anyone out there had to resort to this and is there all that much pressure left on the valve springs? Itchin' to pull the trigger... Nate NADdMD@aol.com ------------------------------[ <- Message 37 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970304 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 1997 20:12:12 -0800 From: twakeman@scruznet.com (TeriAnn Wakeman) Subject: Re: Painting Birmabright At 5:22 PM 3/3/97 +0000, Ian Harper/Donna-Claire McLeod wrote: >Is there any disadvantage to not painting the Birmabright and leaving it >silver? It does oxidize, and may get the white powder cancerous type oxidation. You best bet is to go to your local FBO and get the silver metal finish that they put on unpainted aluminum skinned aircraft. It wil look good and protect the metal. > I'm refurbishing my S1 and it looks so nice (the parts that >have the paint off already) and also that way I don't have to commit to >a colour!!! You will need to keep paint on the bulkhead and breakfast. > Is it more likely to corrode without paint, yes > And, if I do take off all the paint, can I damage the >aluminum by taking it off woth a wire brush(on a drill)? Yes. The metal is very soft and you will be making deep scratches that can not be covered over by paint. You will ether need to sand off a lot of the surface or or skim the body. If your original paint is not too bad you do not want to remove it. Its tougher than any paint that you will replace it with and makes a good base coat to be painted over. I had to remove mine because there was a LOT of bondo and in '81 someone walked the entire driver's side of my 109 with a propane tourch while it was parked at work. >Also, the top of the rad is a beautiful brass colour now that it's >stripped down, and I'd like to leave it like that....... >a colour!!! Brass oxidises very quickly and looks bad. Eastwood makes a clear paint designed to go over polished metal. It works very good in warm weather. TeriAnn Wakeman "Large format photographers look Santa Cruz California at the world upside down and twakeman@scruznet.com backwards" ------------------------------[ <- Message 38 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970304 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 1997 20:12:36 -0800 From: twakeman@scruznet.com (TeriAnn Wakeman) Subject: Re: IIA Panel Key Question At 7:38 AM 2/25/97 -0500, Mark Gehlhausen wrote: >Thanks TeriAnn. Thought I was having a bad dream with that RN page. >A second panel question. The combo key/lamp switch is my favorite LR [ truncated by lro-digester (was 7 lines)] >sure the original key had more character. Do you know what it looked >like? Was it solid brass? Where can I get the real McCoy? Mark Mine arre just rectangular handled plated brass. I recently got new tumblers with keys & they were the same basic type. >PS. Have you ever drunk from the Lombardi Spring tap on Route 92 >near Half Moon Bay? >part, but my key is a duplicate rustable steel "Curtis UN18" type. I'm No but I've passed it many a time TeriAnn Wakeman "Large format photographers look Santa Cruz California at the world upside down and twakeman@scruznet.com backwards" ------------------------------[ <- Message 39 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970304 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 97 00:22:35 UT From: "Charles F. Proctor" <CharlesFProctor@msn.com> Subject: RE: Permission for posting why not set up a special board for advertisements - I like them also why not a board for D90/110 and another for RR and another for Series vehicles - I got 3689 unread messages in my computer - I will never read them. Charlie Proctor ---------- From: William Caloccia Sent: Sunday, March 02, 1997 10:42 PM Subject: RE: Permission for posting To Gene Sparks: Please do NOT post more info about your business to the list, as if you do, then others will be obliged to, and that isn't the purpose for this list. Please do feel free to include your return e-mail address (the last I have is "Gene Sparks" <galleryg@techline.com>) and the pointer to your businesses web pages in your posts (last I have is: www.techline.com/~galleryg/rhino.htm ) both of which were missing from your last message (It kind of defeats the purpose of a signature file to have a bunch of garbage characters and not have the real goods - keep it simple :-) Cheers, Bill Caloccia wpc@Caloccia.Net http://www.Caloccia.Net/wpc/ R http://www.Land-Rover.Team.Net/~majordom/lr/ R 1 3 2wd H D +--|--| o | L 3 Land Rovers First 2 4 4wd L | 2 because '63 SIIa RHD 88" H 1 Land Rovers Last 793-PTA '90 RR County ------------------------------[ <- Message 40 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970304 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Beckett, Ron" <rbeckett@nibupad.telstra.com.au> Subject: CB40 Highlander Date: Tue, 04 Mar 97 16:33:00 EST Below is the text of a news item in the latest issue of the Aussie mag "wheels" Land Rover is joining the rapidly growing compact 4wd sector currently dominated by Toyota's RAV4 - with the launch of its new Highlander. Codenamed CB40 during development, Highlander will be launched to the world in July, reaching Australia in February 1998. The five-door version is booked for Australian duty, but local execs are still weighing up the viability of the three-door model. If it does come here, the removable hardtop and optional soft-top will help it compete against the image-is-all Wrangler. The Highlander will be offered in a range of specifications with engines pulled from the Rover passenger car parts bin. They include the 86kW 1.8 litre four, the 2.5 litre KV6 and a 2.0 litre diesel. Land Rover say that price will not be a competing factor, meaning it will cost more than its competitors. Instead heavy emphasis will be placed on technological advancement and a wealth of features over its rivals - which will include the all-new Mercedes-Benz M-class (formerly AAV) when it arrives in late 1998. Prices of the three-tiered model range should stretch from A$40,000 to A$60,000 ------------------------------[ <- Message 41 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970304 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 1997 22:16:54 -0800 From: Uncle Roger <sinasohn@crl.com> Subject: Re: "Iron Duke" A Worthy Choice? At 07:47 AM 3/3/97 -500, you wrote: >Is the "ron Duke" 4 cylinder engine a good replacement choice for a >109? I believe this is a GM/Pontiac unit? Given that lack of originality >is not an issue, what other engines should I consider? Mark I sure hope it is. Scotty's putting one in my 109". 8^) --------------------------------------------------------------------- O- Uncle Roger "There is pleasure pure in being mad sinasohn@crl.com that none but madmen know." Roger Louis Sinasohn & Associates San Francisco, California http://www.crl.com/~sinasohn/ ------------------------------[ <- Message 42 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970304 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 1997 09:34:03 +0100 (MET) From: Ketil Kirkerud <ketilk@a.sol.no> Subject: Re: I HAVE HAD IT (valve removal) From: NADdMD@aol.com THAT'S IT I'VE HAD IT!!! [tale about stubborn valves snipped ] I was about to cut the upper bits off with the reciprocating saw (how I spell relief) when the thought of safety wear vaguely entered my mind. Should I wear: a. safety goggles b. full face motorcycle helmet c. kevlar vest d. catcher's cup e. all the above Has anyone out there had to resort to this and is there all that much pressure left on the valve springs? Yes, there is most probably a lot of pressure in the springs. Before you try anything drastical - try this : The first time i did my valves, they were extremely stubborn. The tip I got, which worked very well, was to put the head on a table, with a piece of wood (or similar) under the valve head. From the top, use a socket (I'd guess that a 21mm or so is appropriate), and hit the socket with a good-sized hammer. This should loosen up the collets. ______ | | | | <- socket || || -- -- --||-- || <- top of valve ------------------------------[ <- Message 43 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970304 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Cyl. head |-----------| | || | | ------ | <- valve head _________| /----\ |______________ \----/ <- piece of wood, to keep valve from moving. Regards, ---Ketil Kirkerud (1979 109" SW, 21/4 Petrol) ------------------------------[ <- Message 44 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970304 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: marsden@digicon-egr.co.uk (Richard Marsden) Subject: Re: CB40 Highlander Date: Tue, 4 Mar 97 8:50:18 GMT So "Highlander" is now the official name for the CB40? I wonder what that company in the UK that refurbishes (+adds options,trim,etc) SIIIs will do. Its main product is called the "Highlander" and has Defender style graphics saying so... Richard ------------------------------[ <- Message 45 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970304 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Tue, 04 Mar 1997 21:01:27 +1000 From: Ross <fax.rescue@hunterlink.net.au> Subject: Re: Land Rovers in US market Frank W.C. wrote: > Ron, > Sorry to hear about the gun-grabbers in your nation. I guess it isn't the [ truncated by lro-digester (was 7 lines)] > the drug crazed criminals like we have in Philadelphia. A virus?? I hope it > never happens! For God's sake amd yours. xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxREPLYxxxxxxxxxxxxx Has happened. AIDS virus is there (and here) already, right? It has always been illegal in Aust to have pistols and fully automatics and machine guns. (If I was a cynic, I would mention our guys being sent to 'The Vietnam Problem' in '65 with WW2 rifles, and after a while being given M-16A's by 173 Airborne...) What has changed is the disprepancys between the 8 States different rules. EG when I brought a lever action as a 18 year old that was Ok, the owner paid a licence fee, a single fee even if you owned heaps of rifles.. When I moved interstate I had to register the rifles numbers, not me. The massacre person used a totally illegal semi auto mil cal assault weapon, unregistered, costing AUD4000+ . So now they're coordinating the states laws, no more semis period- not BB, not .22, not shotgun, etc. Bolts and levers are okay and so are leveraction .357 carbines etc. So are leverd shotguns and pumps. On the subject of deadly weapons, I have seen vehicles on the road so full of rust (hack TLC's, Nissans et al) and so vague and brakeless (hack Landies) that they're rolling massacre material. Same problem between states: in Queensland I am sure Iron oxide chassis etc is legal, while in the ACT (similar to D.C.) vehicle inspection is chapter and verse. In all states Volvo cars are unsanctioned at all, so excitement abounds. All the above is standard fare for our 'Sickty Minutes' TV shows which run all the above stories endlessly. Seriously though, they should confiscate all the guns and issue shining Penn Game fishing reels or outboards or something. Ross, in The United States Of Australia. PS New Land-Rover SWB canvas for sale. ------------------------------[ <- Message 46 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970304 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
END OF LAND ROVER OWNER DIGEST Input: messages 44 lines 1980 [forwarded 213 whitespace 453] Output: lines 1431 [content 903 forwarded 98 (cut 115) whitespace 398][ First Message | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970304 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Back | Forward | |
---|---|---|
Photos & text Copyright 1990-2011 Bill Caloccia, All rights reserved. Digest Messages Copyright 1990-2011 by the original poster or/and Bill Caloccia, All rights reserved.
|