[ First Message Last | Table of Contents | <- Digest -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
msg | Sender | lines | Subject |
1 | "Mark Gehlhausen" [Gehl@ | 10 | Grease Revisited |
2 | ASFCO@aol.com | 14 | Re: Wiper Locations? |
3 | Iwan Vosloo [ivosloo@cs. | 17 | Oil pressure |
4 | wleacock@pipeline.com | 21 | Shimmy |
5 | Michel Bertrand [mbertra | 43 | Re: LR in Hydro projects |
6 | "Adams, Bill" [badams@us | 13 | Re: Oil pressure |
7 | wleacock@pipeline.com | 46 | 24 V conversion |
8 | Michel Bertrand [mbertra | 20 | Tie-rod end and exhaust system... |
9 | Dixon Kenner [dkenner@em | 10 | Re: Capstans |
10 | "LT J Jackson" [lt_j_jac | 27 | Re- Alternate Alternators |
11 | finchm@sky2.bskyb.com | 14 | change of address |
12 | "Benjamin G. Newman,MD" | 10 | Nigel@ Lancaster University |
13 | Tim Harincar [harincar@c | 22 | Re: Land Rovers in US market |
14 | Tim Harincar [harincar@c | 15 | Grey market 110 sighting in minneapolis |
15 | "Brian Hanson/EW/BNL" [B | 17 | Re: Land Rovers in US market |
16 | Alan_Richer/CAM/Lotus@lo | 28 | Re: Land Rovers in US market |
17 | Alan_Richer/CAM/Lotus@lo | 17 | Re: Breathers, brakes, and gearboxes |
18 | Martin Eglitis [Martin_E | 27 | Re: Land Rovers in US market |
19 | "Brian Hanson/EW/BNL" [B | 19 | Re: Land Rovers in US market |
20 | marsden@digicon-egr.co.u | 19 | Re: Breathers, brakes, and gearboxes |
21 | Adrian Redmond [channel6 | 33 | Re: Oil pressure |
22 | debrown@srp.gov | 22 | PAP |
23 | Phairoj Phatsorpinyosaku | 17 | Discovery Mpi on FIRE!! |
24 | Andy Woodward [azw@aber. | 21 | Land Cruisers |
25 | Andy Woodward [azw@aber. | 2 | [not specified] |
26 | Michel Bertrand [mbertra | 57 | Re: Land Rovers in US market |
27 | "G. Mugele" [mewgull@ix. | 37 | [not specified] |
28 | David W Scott [birddog@a | 9 | headlights |
29 | debrown@srp.gov | 39 | 109 available in Arizona |
30 | Alan_Richer/CAM/Lotus@lo | 25 | Re: headlights |
31 | Land_Rovers@learnlink.em | 15 | Re: Oil pressure |
32 | Land_Rovers@learnlink.em | 43 | frame galvanizing ? |
33 | David Place [dplace@mb.s | 15 | Re: sick starters and dead batteries |
34 | SPYDERS@aol.com | 25 | Brake lights on 110 |
35 | Leland J Roys [roys@hpke | 31 | Def-90 Spark Timing? |
36 | N4PTK@InfoAve.Net | 23 | Re: sick starters and dead batteries |
37 | "Beckett, Ron" [rbeckett | 108 | FW: Word 6 Virus Alert |
38 | Uncle Roger [sinasohn@cr | 18 | Cheap RR in Montreal? (Was: Land Rovers in US market) |
39 | frank01@postoffice.ptd.n | 31 | Re: Land Rovers in US market |
40 | Tony Yates [a.yates@bom. | 18 | Re: Land Rovers in US market |
41 | Hank Rutherford [ruthrfr | 11 | Replacement keys;Re: Mark Gehlhausen |
42 | rover@pinn.net (Alexande | 25 | Past histories |
43 | "Beckett, Ron" [rbeckett | 20 | What if Spartacus had a Piper Cub... |
44 | "Brian Cramer" [defender | 47 | Re: Def-90 Spark Timing? |
45 | ericz@cloud9.net | 33 | Re: headlights |
46 | ericz@cloud9.net | 79 | Re: Land Rovers In US Market |
47 | ericz@cloud9.net | 26 | Re: Door Seals??? |
48 | Franck & Naida Ergas [er | 7 | ARB front bumpers |
49 | Franz Parzefall [franz@m | 30 | Re: sick starters and dead batteries |
50 | Dean Cording [dean@holly | 20 | Re: PAP |
From: "Mark Gehlhausen" <Gehl@sphinx.crane.navy.mil> Date: Wed, 26 Feb 1997 06:56:33 -500 Subject: Grease Revisited Last week, we covered dielectric grease and red rubber grease. This week, I would like to know the purposes for: a) silicone grease and b) Lubriplate. Mark ------------------------------[ <- Message 2 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970227 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: ASFCO@aol.com Date: Wed, 26 Feb 1997 07:34:57 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: Wiper Locations? Keith; Sounds like these holes you are talking about are for washer jets...since you already have the holes...I would fit a couple of jets and a washer/pump under the bonnet. Rgds Steve Bradke 72 Series lll 88 68 Series lla 88 96 Discovery ------------------------------[ <- Message 3 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970227 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 1997 15:06:23 +0200 From: Iwan Vosloo <ivosloo@cs.up.ac.za> Subject: Oil pressure All, I would like to know from people with 2.25 diesels what their oil pressure is: a) idling-cold engine b) while cruising at your normal cruising speed c) idling-engine warm (It was silly of me to fit a guage...something new to worry about.) - Iwan Vosloo ( '75 SIII 88" Diesel ) ------------------------------[ <- Message 4 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970227 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: wleacock@pipeline.com Date: Wed, 26 Feb 1997 08:34:46 -0500 Subject: Shimmy >From: Clare & Lee Dunkelber >Subject: Shake and Shimmy (noncommercial) >Just got a '91 Range Rover. Now that I've got it home, I notice a shake >and a shimmy in the steering, but mostly only between 63-67 mph. It comes >and goes fom quiet ride, back to quiet ride. Most likely the panhard rod bushes, also check the track rod ends and the steering arm to power steering connection, these often come loose. It is unlikely to be the bushes in the axles, these tend to show up as direction changes when power is applied or un applied without changing the steering wheel position. Bill Leacock Limey in exile 89 RR; 67 - 109 and early 88. ------------------------------[ <- Message 5 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970227 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 1997 08:41:25 -0500 From: Michel Bertrand <mbertran@interlinx.qc.ca> Subject: Re: LR in Hydro projects Funny coincidence, In the 50's, 60's and early 70's, there was a major hydro-electricity project in the James Bay area (Hudson's Bay). From what I could understand, they ordered over 300 Land Rovers to help survey the geography and the building process. All were equipped with Koenig winch, extra heater, LHD or RHD (who cares, there weren't any roads...) The keys were left in the ignition, and whoever needed one just picked one up and drove away. It was a govermental project, so there was a lot of spare parts due to unlimited budgets. Today, there are still a few running in that area (from what I have heard), there is also a guy up there who rebuilds them for fun (Must be the only Series LR enthusiast living so close to the pole) -again, from what I have heard- Most of them were buried with a bunch of equipment when the project was over. Some found their way down south on a few truck beds and were restored and sold by a fanatic of the time (P Lemieux). A guy in Abitibi presently has 10 or 12 Ser III from the project as he intends to do some off-roading tourism in that area. He was also lucky enough to buy the rest of the spare parts that stayed in a barn for so long. There were engines, transmissions, winches, etc... still in crates and the original oily wrapping. The guy got a real bargain. Could be part of the trip that is planned for next summer to try and find some relatives to our landies. Apelerinage, maybe? Looks like Land Rovers have something to do with big construction projects... Salutations, Michel Bertrand ______ Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada, / __ / \ 1963 109 PU (Rudolph) | Lucas | 1968 109 SW (in the works) | Inside | 1973 88 SW (21st century project) \ / \______/ ------------------------------[ <- Message 6 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970227 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 1997 8:47:35 -0500 From: "Adams, Bill" <badams@usia.gov> Subject: Re: Oil pressure Idling cold...45 psi cruising....55-60 psi warm idle....55 psi Bill Adams 3D Artist/Animator '66 Land Rover S2A 109 Diesel Station Wagon: "Practicing the ancient oriental art of ren-ching" ------------------------------[ <- Message 7 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970227 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: wleacock@pipeline.com Date: Wed, 26 Feb 1997 08:53:08 -0500 Subject: 24 V conversion From: "Benjamin G. Newman,MD" <medone@iag.net> Subject: 24 Volts I have a strong interest in buying`an ex-Mod in great condition but it has a 24 volt system. What are the advantages and disavantages of this system? What would a place like RN charge to change to a 12 volt system. Response :- The advantages are great starting and lots of current for welding, lights, radios etc. Note well the ignition coil and circuit is 12 volt. The disadvantages are:- Expensive and hard to find parts ( relatively easy to find in the UK at ex military parts dealers ) high power loss due to the big alternator. ( 2. 4 kW = 3 horse power ) Heavier components ( extra battery, heavy alternator ) Difficulty finding 24 v accessories, so complicated wiring systems needed. An expensive conversion by Rovers North, ( or any Rover shop,) because they will charge you full price for lots of parts which can be more easily and cheaply sourced elsewhere, and lots of labour for making a simple job look difficult. The conversion is not difficult. ( it can't be I have done several, and I am a mechanical engineer, not electrical ) I had an article published last year in the Ottawa Valley newsletter with details of the necessary work Need to change, starter, alternator, fuel tank senders, light bulbs, heater motor ( optional ) wiper motor. starter solenoid, flasher can and perhaps a few other miscellanous bits. It is NOT necessary to change the wiring harness, only a few wires to change in the charging circuit. My advise, run the 24 volt until you have problems, in the meantime start collecting the parts for a conversion. Bill Leacock Limey in exile 89 RR; 67 - 109 and early 88. ------------------------------[ <- Message 8 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970227 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 1997 08:55:28 -0500 From: Michel Bertrand <mbertran@interlinx.qc.ca> Subject: Tie-rod end and exhaust system... Thank you all for giving me tips on the tie-rod ends. It is very appreciated. I would also like to thank you those (especially Richard) who helped in my exhaust system setup. Looks like there are two different setups for the Ser III, early and late, and of course, I had the wrong one... A bient=F4t, Michel Bertrand ______ Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada, / __ / \ 1963 109 PU (Rudolph) | Lucas | 1968 109 SW (in the works) | Inside | 1973 88 SW (21st century project) \ / \______/ ------------------------------[ <- Message 9 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970227 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 1997 09:19:22 -0500 (EST) From: Dixon Kenner <dkenner@emr1.NRCan.gc.ca> Subject: Re: Capstans On Tue, 25 Feb 1997, Alexander P. Grice wrote: > It should be on the FAQ by now, right Dixon? ;-) Cheers In the right directory, not linked though... Soon... :-) ------------------------------[ <- Message 10 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970227 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: 26 Feb 1997 09:40:40 -0400 From: "LT J Jackson" <lt_j_jackson@unixlink.uscga.edu> Subject: Re- Alternate Alternators Sandy Grice asked about the mods needed to fit the 90A Delco into my SIII: First, please call me Jeff; my e-mail title is LT because the sysadmin types say it must be so, not because I'm a certifiable DSM-IV narcissistic personality (though my wife and the 900 cadets here may beg to differ.) For my alternator swap -- ten minutes with a hacksaw and it fit real nicely (that could be the thematic statement for any number of my engineering efforts). I don't want to draw the ire of the list, but I'm much more of a pragmatist than a purist. Don't worry, I have no intention of buying a Dormobile, though they are very cool. The two pronged alternator mount needed about 3/16" removed from the front prong. The alternator was fairly over-engineered for a GM product (easy, Bill) - a stout 3/8" of the bracket remained when I was done hacking away, and it's shown no evidence of cracking. Belt alignment was perfect. Regards, Jeff Jackson 73 SIII 88" daily driver 6? SIIA 88" probably a parts car ------------------------------[ <- Message 11 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970227 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: finchm@sky2.bskyb.com Date: Wed, 26 Feb 1997 14:42:23 +0000 Subject: change of address Hi all My email address has changed from finchm@sky2.bskyb.com to finchm@sky3.bskyb.com it's only the number that has changed from a 2 to a 3. Yours mark finch So remember the new address is finchm@sky3.bskyb.com. ------------------------------[ <- Message 12 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970227 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 1997 09:53:44 -0500 From: "Benjamin G. Newman,MD" <medone@iag.net> Subject: Nigel@ Lancaster University Nigel You are the fellow I am trying to contact.I am still interested in the dash boards you want to sell. I lost your address. If you are out there please contact me, Regards Benjamin ------------------------------[ <- Message 13 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970227 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Tim Harincar <harincar@camworks.com> Subject: Re: Land Rovers in US market Date: Wed, 26 Feb 1997 09:19:02 -0600 > At least Land Rover seems to have learned from their mistakes and is > treating the North American market seriously. Um, I beg to differ with that. These limited production, high end, every = option or nothing vehicles are hardly intended to gain any type of = market share. They are high end vehicles for the high end market. Talk = to me when I can get a stripped D90 for $22K (or whatever the current = cost is). Or a nice D110 pick-up. Or any one of the other variants that = are made but can't buy here. Hell, I don't care whether they import them = or not, but at least let us special order one... Tim --- tim harincar harincar@camworks.com Camworks, minneapolis, mn ------------------------------[ <- Message 14 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970227 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Tim Harincar <harincar@camworks.com> Subject: Grey market 110 sighting in minneapolis Date: Wed, 26 Feb 1997 09:20:49 -0600 Yesterday heading south out of Minneapolis on 35W I saw a red 110 SW, no roll cage, and a white painted roof. Anybody know who owns that...? Tim --- tim harincar harincar@camworks.com Camworks, minneapolis, mn ------------------------------[ <- Message 15 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970227 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 97 11:24:00 est From: "Brian Hanson/EW/BNL" <Brian_Hanson/EW/BNL_at_BLNOTESMAIL@blwn0009.bausch.com> Subject: Re: Land Rovers in US market >Um, I beg to differ with that. These limited production, high end, every option or nothing >vehicles are hardly intended to gain any type of market share. They are high end vehicles >for the high end market. Talk to me when I can get a stripped D90 for $22K (or whatever the >current cost is). Or a nice D110 pick-up. Or any one of the other variants that are made >but.can't buy here. Hell, I don't care whether they import them or not, but at least let us >special order one... But that's what the American market wants. Have you looked at the offerings from Toyota, Nissan, Lexus, Honda, etc. They're all fully loaded outrageously priced vehicles. LR is just cashing in on this trend. And I've seen a tonne of Discoverys on the road so they are doing something right. ------------------------------[ <- Message 16 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970227 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Alan_Richer/CAM/Lotus@lotus.com Date: Wed, 26 Feb 1997 10:45:57 -0400 Subject: Re: Land Rovers in US market Brian Hanson remarked: But that's what the American market wants. Have you looked at the offerings from Toyota, Nissan, Lexus, Honda, etc. They're all fully loaded outrageously priced vehicles. LR is just cashing in on this trend. And I've seen a tonne of Discoverys on the road so they are doing something right. Nope - not all by a long shot. Take a look on your average dealer lot for the pickup and 4 x 4 crowd and a lot of the available vehicles are modestly optioned, typically air and a trim package. Take a good look at what's running around the highways for pickups and the like - not the poseur/soccer mom crowd. Most pickups are modestly optioned working vehicles, with the sparkly high-end ones being the commuter/see-previous-commentary types. These are two distinct market segments - those who want a truck to use as a truck, and the poseurs. ajr ------------------------------[ <- Message 17 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970227 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Alan_Richer/CAM/Lotus@lotus.com Date: Wed, 26 Feb 1997 11:00:37 -0400 Subject: Re: Breathers, brakes, and gearboxes Re: Gnarled bits in the 4WD casing? Did you find the oil-slinger that's supposed to be on the shaft (looks like 2 metal straps, bolted around the shaft)? If you didn't, I'll lay odds that's what's gone to grass..... Other than that, i'd suspect strongly the brass bushing in the end of the front output shaft being bad and allowing the shaft to flop... aj"ICK!"r ------------------------------[ <- Message 18 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970227 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 1997 11:07:32 -0500 From: Martin Eglitis <Martin_Eglitis@nih.gov> Subject: Re: Land Rovers in US market Alan Richter, Responding to Brian Hanson remarked: >But that's what the American market wants. Have you looked at the >offerings from Toyota, Nissan, Lexus, Honda, etc. They're all fully loaded [ truncated by lro-digester (was 21 lines)] >>truck, and the poseurs. >> ajr I think it's a little more complicated than comparing LR to the low-end pick-up segment of the market. LR is a European-based manufacturer, and if you look at what Europe imports to the US it is exclusively the high-end product. Why? Most likely manufacturing costs and recovery of investment. Volvo makes a lot of cars other than 740s and 850s, but those are the only ones with which it can make a satisfactory profit in the US. The margins for European manufacturers are just too small to allow import of stripped vehicles. Even the Japanese have become less stripped as their costs have escalated. Witness the rise of Korea as a producer of low-end wheels for the NA market. You can gripe that you can't get a stripped D90 in NA, but it isn't strictly because that is not what LR wants to import. Wants and can are 2 different things, and market forces (read profit margin) dictates what LR can import. As has been pointed out, LR must be doing something right because in 2 yr sales in the US have become a sizeable fraction of total production. You know Herr BMW can't be too unhappy about that!! ------------------------------[ <- Message 19 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970227 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 97 12:29:00 est From: "Brian Hanson/EW/BNL" <Brian_Hanson/EW/BNL_at_BLNOTESMAIL@blwn0009.bausch.com> Subject: Re: Land Rovers in US market >Nope - not all by a long shot. Take a look on your average dealer lot for the pickup and 4 x >4 crowd and a lot of the available vehicles are modestly optioned, typically air and a trim >package. >Take a good look at what's running around the highways for pickups and the like - not the >poseur/soccer mom crowd. >Most pickups are modestly optioned working vehicles, with the sparkly high-end ones being >the commuter/see-previous-commentary types. >These are two distinct market segments - those who want a truck to use as a truck, and the >poseurs. >ajr Yes, I definately agree about the two segments. Unfortunately, where I live, the poseur crowd wins out. You can't find a strip down truck.(Well, you can, but it takes a lot of looking and dealers aren't that helpful because they don't make as much.) ------------------------------[ <- Message 20 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970227 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: marsden@digicon-egr.co.uk (Richard Marsden) Subject: Re: Breathers, brakes, and gearboxes Date: Wed, 26 Feb 97 16:31:24 GMT > Re: Gnarled bits in the 4WD casing? > Did you find the oil-slinger that's supposed to be on the shaft (looks like > 2 metal straps, bolted around the shaft)? Yep, the oil-splasher,thingy was bolted on quite fine. The marks would have been between the splasher and the dog clutch. Wondering if it was the fork that caused them? > If you didn't, I'll lay odds that's what's gone to grass..... > Other than that, i'd suspect strongly the brass bushing in the end of the [ truncated by lro-digester (was 9 lines)] > front output shaft being bad and allowing the shaft to flop... > aj"ICK!"r ------------------------------[ <- Message 21 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970227 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 1997 17:39:12 -0800 From: Adrian Redmond <channel6@post2.tele.dk> Subject: Re: Oil pressure My 109 shows the following - Idling cold - 50 psi, Cruising - 65-70 psi, idling warm 60 psi. My 88 shows about 5 psi less on all counts - could be the enigines, could be the meters - both are rebored and overhauled 88 in 1990 109 in 1995. hope this helps. (Check that your oil pressure meter circuit is fed from the instruments stabilised power supply which is located on the back of the fuel/temp meter panel in the dash - otherwise your readings will be affected by the varying voltage of your alternator/battery) -- Adrian Redmond --------------------------------------------------- CHANNEL 6 TELEVISION DENMARK (Adrian Redmond) Foerlevvej 6 Mesing DK-8660 Skanderborg Denmark --------------------------------------------------- telephone (office) +45 86 57 22 66 telephone (home) +45 86 57 22 64 telefacsimile / data +45 76 57 24 46 mobile GSM (EFP unit) +45 40 74 75 64 mobile GSM (admin) +45 40 50 22 66 mobile NMT +45 30 86 75 66 e-mail channel6@post2.tele.dk HoTMaiL (www.e-mail) channel6denmark@hotmail.com --------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------[ <- Message 22 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970227 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: debrown@srp.gov Date: 26 Feb 97 09:46:49 MST Subject: PAP FROM: David Brown Internet: debrown@srp.gov Computer Graphics Specialist ~ S.R.P. ~ AM/FM - Graphic Records PAB219 (602)236-3544 - Pager:6486 External (602)275-2508 #6486 Hello all... Just had an idea, Would PAP (Perforated Aluminum Plate) be a good roof rack floor material? Seems that if you're going to carry it around with you that maybe you should use it for something useful, no? Dave (thinking too hard Today) Brown P.S. Anyone come up with a good (inexpensive) source? Habit is the best of servants, #=======# _____l___ or the worst of masters. |__|__|__\___ //__/__|__\___ - Nathaniel Emmens | _| | |_ |} \__ - ____ - _|} - "(_)""""""(_)" (_) (_) ------------------------------[ <- Message 23 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970227 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 00:08:57 +0700 From: Phairoj Phatsorpinyosakul <cnxpphts@cmu.chiangmai.ac.th> Subject: Discovery Mpi on FIRE!! Hi LR fans, Has anyone experienced or heard about the Discovery Mpi caugh fire without obvious reason?!! There are serveral reports of Mpi caugh fire in Thailand and still, the distributor has not come up with a solution. Your advise would be very important for many of the Mpi owners here in Thailand. Cheerio, Phairoj. '94 Disco Mpi '92 730i ------------------------------[ <- Message 24 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970227 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Andy Woodward <azw@aber.ac.uk> Date: Wed, 26 Feb 1997 18:23:31 +0000 Subject: Land Cruisers >>Toyota rarely push the pedigree of the LC and how Thiess Bros >>imported them for their contract work on the Snowy Mountains Hydro [ truncated by lro-digester (was 14 lines)] >(correct me if anyone knows better, but this is what came out of >it), there were only a handful of Tojos used, towards the end of the >project, with SI LandRovers being the main vehicle. The way I heard it is that farmers in the outback choose LCs over LRs, cos if you''re nearest habitation is 100 miles away, you need something that is stone-reliable. I was under the impression that LR are no longer flavour of teh month. The disadvantage to em is that where LRs flex over prolonged abuse in really rough terrain, LCs snap. This might be more important to construction crews.... .. ------------------------------[ <- Message 25 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970227 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
------------------------------[ <- Message 26 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970227 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 1997 12:35:26 -0500 From: Michel Bertrand <mbertran@interlinx.qc.ca> Subject: Re: Land Rovers in US market At 11:07 97-02-26 -0500, you wrote: >I think it's a little more complicated than comparing LR to the low-end -pick-up segment of the market. LR is a European-based manufacturer, and if >you look at what Europe imports to the US it is exclusively the high-end -product. - Well, over here in Canada, there is a german car manufacturer that offers low-end cars. Volkswagen. You can even go to the dealer and buy one that only has the driver's seat, 4-speed manual, no trim at all, for pizza-delivery purpose. I think that it is more of a question of attitude from the big chief overseas. In Canada, they're not selling the Defender anymore. Why? It doesn't suit the needs of the market. Why couldn't Solihull offer a stripped-down Defender for pizza-delivery purposes in the backroads? They could, and they would make money out of it, but they make more money out of a fully-equipped vehicle. That's just too bad. The basic defender would certainly reduce the gizmo-Defender sales, therefore, less profit, unless the number of vehicles sold is greater. Even if you bring a standard Defender close to the price of a top-end T-J, I am not convinced that the sales would go up. Land Rover doesn't have a good reputation over here where reliability is a must. You don't want to be left on the side of a dark and lonely road at night with a dead engine when it's -40 outside. Montreal new Range Rover Owners, in average, don't keep their vehicles for more than two years. After that, it goes back to the dealer which will end up sold at an auction for 20,000$. RR owners (and maybe Disco, time will tell) sell their trucks as soon as the warranty expires, which doesn't quite happen with Suburbans and others. Very few manufacturers are able to sell a new vehicle every two years to the same chap. The profit margin is even bigger. Customers who will buy basic Defenders will probably keep them a long time, (if they don't die frozen on the side of the road), thus not buying one once every two years. There is a market for basic-Defenders, but LR opted for the high-end market. It is a question of strategy. Might not like it, but do I have a choice? Hmmm, this is 1997... 1997-15= 1982... I could bring a Stage I in and park at Decarie Motors, leaking oil... Salutations, Michel Bertrand ______ Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada, / __ / \ 1963 109 PU (Rudolph) | Lucas | 1968 109 SW (in the works) | Inside | 1973 88 SW (21st century project) \ / \______/ ------------------------------[ <- Message 27 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970227 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Subject: Re: What if Spartacus had a Piper Cub... Date: Wed, 26 Feb 97 11:11:12 -0800 From: "G. Mugele" <mewgull@ix.netcom.com> >FWIW Gerry, a 69 Bronco listed at $2945 with hardtop (they had enough power >where they didn't need a 4 spd.) [ truncated by lro-digester (was 23 lines)] >desirable thing now-a-days, back then most yanks figured you shouldn't have >to fix 'em, at least for awhile and besides 'all' vehicles built in the >60's were easy to repair. Joe, Here's your chance to see what gets cut...just compare this direct response with the edited version that comes through LRO. I think that you thought the prices you quoted were contradictory to what I said; not so. You confirmed. The Bronco with a top @ $2945 came with a bench seat, crappy street tires. three speed, etc. By the time you got the good seats, reasonable tires, tax license, dealer prep, undercoating and all the other crap it was *more* than a LR. I priced them *all* in the spring of '69. And in the '60s I rarely looked at any detroit iron. The only small 4WD cheaper than a LR equipped the same way as the " 88 Deluxe Hardtop" was the Land Bruiser and it was only about $150 less. If you only look at base price I'd agree that the LR appears to cost more...but the base price has as much in common with what you pay for your Buick as a Nascar Stocker has in common with it. I always price new cars by comparing the number that will go on the check, that is the only real number. I agree with you numbers, I disagree with your conclusion. I was not rich when I bought that Land Rover, far from it. Newly married and trying to save for a downpayment on a house, I didn't have money to add to a new truck to make it as good off-road as the LR would be stock from the dealer. A friend bought a new CJ5 the month before, I think with a V8, softop, HD suspension, 4-speed, etc. The options are what really cost you. His out the door price was $3800 and then he immediatedly went out and got new wheels and tires. Within a year he had close to $5000 into his Jeep and never seemed to be able to go anywhere I couldn't. :-) ------------------------------[ <- Message 28 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970227 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: David W Scott <birddog@atl.mindspring.com> Subject: headlights Date: Wed, 26 Feb 1997 15:58:23 -0600 Prince Charles the 11a needs some new headlight bulbs. I saw a halogen = set for 80 bucks for the pair. Anyone know of a cheaper alternative? = Have a great day, birddog ------------------------------[ <- Message 29 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970227 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: debrown@srp.gov Date: 26 Feb 97 15:00:35 MST Subject: 109 available in Arizona FROM: David Brown Internet: debrown@srp.gov Computer Graphics Specialist ~ S.R.P. ~ AM/FM - Graphic Records PAB219 (602)236-3544 - Pager:6486 External (602)275-2508 #6486 At the risk of competing against myself, (I plan to sell my 109 sometime this year) I thought I'd let the internet community know of a 109 for sale in Scottsdale Arizona. (Pima and Shey area) 1964 109 5-door safari top, good body, good frame, rebuilt engine 2.5 years ago, no overdrive, dover blue. Full length roof rack (with front overhang) Has "Trooper" seats, but the guy has the orig. seats (need upholstery) Headliner is "out" (I assume gone, or torn) everything works except the handbrake. (big surprise, eh?) Claims to have been in Africa for 25 years, then Newport Beach for 5. Asking $8800 obo. Call (602) 256-8969 for the owner. If you buy it, please "remember me" in some way. ;-) ($$ works nicely!) (If you don't "remember me" I'll call down curses from the prince of darkness that we all submit to: Lucas!!) ;-) Dave (trying to get positive "rover carma") Brown P.S. If you miss out on this one, mine will be available at near this price in the not too distant future. I'll post a blatant advertisement at that time... (Mine's a '70 with extra frame and many parts.) Habit is the best of servants, #=======# _____l___ or the worst of masters. |__|__|__\___ //__/__|__\___ - Nathaniel Emmens | _| | |_ |} \__ - ____ - _|} - "(_)""""""(_)" (_) (_) ------------------------------[ <- Message 30 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970227 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Alan_Richer/CAM/Lotus@lotus.com Date: Wed, 26 Feb 1997 17:47:28 -0400 Subject: Re: headlights Re: 80 bucks a pair for halogens: Not on MY truck.....8*) Mr. Churchill is happily running halogen sealed beams from Sylvania. They work great, drop right in in place of the original sealed beams, and run about $10 each. This, I realize, is not a solution for the British Rover folks, but the American ones were built with sealed beams and not the bulb/reflector combo of the UK type machines. They work well but do have to be carefully adjusted because of the closeness of the bulbs on the front of a IIa. That, and I get into an argument with the subhuman at safety inspection every year because Mr. Churchill doesn't match his chalkboard for headlight aiming... aj"Helluva lot brighter than stock, they are..."r ------------------------------[ <- Message 31 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970227 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Land_Rovers@learnlink.emory.edu (Jack Walter) Date: Wed, 26 Feb 1997 17:58:27 -0500 Subject: Re: Oil pressure oil pressure readings for my diesel 2.25l as follows - cold - idling about 30-35psi - cruising 50psi hot - idling about 15-20psi -cruising 40-45psi I have a Stewart Warner mechanical 60psi oil pressure gage hooked up to the oil filter tap point - i have sound when the gage starts to drop below 10 psi at idle it's time to add a quart of castrol (10w-30 winter, 10w-40 summer) currently ave about 120,000 miles on this rebuild Jack Walter ------------------------------[ <- Message 32 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970227 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Land_Rovers@learnlink.emory.edu (Jack Walter) Date: Wed, 26 Feb 1997 18:29:32 -0500 Subject: frame galvanizing ? I am currently restoring my treasured 1967 88 and am trying to ensure that it will be around for many future generations to enjoy. The original frame is in exceptionally good shape ( the original chalk marks from the factory assembly line are still quite visible). I had to make a small repair to the rear crossmember where a PO had welded on a Large trailer hitch but other than that it's nearly perfect. i have had the grill panel and firewall e-coated which should ensure their longevity but I am thinking that galvanizing would be more appropriate for long term preservation of the chassis. Some other Land Rover owners have related experiences with galvanizers that bring to mind several questions: Do additional drain/access holes have to be drilled into the box sections to allow full penetration of the zinc bath to prevent the frame rusting from the inside out? If true - where are the best locations and size for these additional holes? - Somebody I talked to said that the galvanizer they took their chassis to had torched some very irregularly shaped holes in the bottom of their chassis box sections for this purpose. Which would be the best orientation for the frame to go into the galvanizing bath (given that the tanks are big enough- right side up, inverted, sideways, nose up, or tail up?) Does all of the paint have to be removed from the frame before going to the galvanizer's or does the pre-coat bath remove the existing paint sufficiently well? What temperature galvanizing bath is best - apparently there are several degrees of hot dip galvanizing up to (I think) 600deg F which might cause the frame to warp. I would appreciate any insights or experiences that other list members might care to share with me on this subject. Thanks, Jack Walter ------------------------------[ <- Message 33 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970227 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 1997 17:48:56 -0800 From: David Place <dplace@mb.sympatico.ca> Subject: Re: sick starters and dead batteries Joe Schaefer wrote: > At 09:45 26-02-97 +0100, you wrote: > >Hi folks, [ truncated by lro-digester (was 15 lines)] > So far as batteries go IMHO get the biggest, meanest, largest CCA rated , > *heaviest* battery you can fit in. > -jj I can't believe you started with only a 42 AH battery. Mine is 800!! AH and you need this for a winch or for cold weather starting. Dave VE4PN ------------------------------[ <- Message 34 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970227 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: SPYDERS@aol.com Date: Wed, 26 Feb 1997 20:11:11 -0500 (EST) Subject: Brake lights on 110 Here's a new one to me... When I press down slowly and gently on the brake pedal, the lights don't go on, even after the pedal is being pressed down hard. When I press down slightly quicker, the lights come on. It seems more related to the speed at which I press the pedal, not so much the final pressure. I discovered this phenomenon when creeping back towards the garage wall and slowly pressing the brake pedal. I use the size of their cones of light on the wall to help judge remaining distance... There is now a sticker on the wall saying "Your Skid Stops HERE" ;) Please send me an e-mail (direct, or cc: me) if you have any ideas on the prince of no light's latest prank. I've fixed the one that turned off brake lights in the rain... that was also an interesting one... hmmmm... who's that tailgating in the rain? thanks, pat. ------------------------------[ <- Message 35 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970227 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Leland J Roys <roys@hpkel13.cup.hp.com> Subject: Def-90 Spark Timing? Date: Wed, 26 Feb 97 17:36:38 PST Hi, I have another question. I am trying to do the spark timing for my 1994 Def-90. I just ordered the shop manual from Atlantic British, it does not go into much detail on how to do the timing. My question is, I can see the timing mark on the crakshaft pulley (I think they called it the torsional damper or something), it has TDC (Top dead center) marked in the middle, and tic marks on each side, with 1/2 at each end of the tic marks. What does the 1/2 mean? The book says I need to time it to 5 degrees before TDC, which mark is 5 degrees? Also, the book says that I need to idle the truck at less than 750 RPM for the test. Do I need to buy a RPM meter, or can I just look at the RPM tach guage?, I am going to buy the strobe timing light, but I wasn't sure if I needed to spend 50$ on the RMP meter as well? This is pretty new to me, I have never done ignition timing before, so any advise would be appreciated. Thanks, Leland Roys 1994 Defender-90 roys@cup.hp.com ------------------------------[ <- Message 36 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970227 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: N4PTK@InfoAve.Net Date: Wed, 26 Feb 1997 21:01:55 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: sick starters and dead batteries > Are you sure it wasn't just a bad ground? One thing everyone needs to be careful about, and that is using the battery cables purchased at most auto parts stores. They are rated at 12 volts BUT they are marginal to say the least. When you replace cables, BE SURE TO GET HEAVY DUTY CABLES. Many auto parts stores (I know NAPA has them) carry a line of heavy cables they sell mainly to truckers. They are 1 gauge with heavy neopreme insulation. This is especially good advice for any of you that might have 6 volt systems. The cables have to carry twice as much amperage at 6 volts as they do 12 volts to do the same amount of work. This is also true in going from 12 volts to 24 volts. Hence, you could get by with lighter cables at 24 volts. As inexpensive as cables are, though, I wouldn't want to. Larry n4ptk@infoave.net ------------------------------[ <- Message 37 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970227 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Beckett, Ron" <rbeckett@nibupad.telstra.com.au> Subject: FW: Word 6 Virus Alert Date: Thu, 27 Feb 97 12:33:00 EST All, For your Information and action as necessary. I wouldn't like to see everyone on the Lists having problems. Ron Beckett ===================== Please note - new Word 6 virus alert. In essence the following summaries how to identify the virus & how to deal with it ***************************** Warning: If you receive a message with the following subject or banner: "You have GOT to read this!", do NOT execute its attachment. Delete the entire message. **************************** The following has been distributed to all mail users in our company by our Corporate Security people. "Late last week McAfee announced they have discovered a new macro virus called "FunShare". Once a computer is infected with FunShare, it will attempt to send the current (infected) document to three recipients from the users address list in MS-Mail (see the details attached below). This virus represents a significant risk to the company, and if it gains a foot-hold in the organisation, it may be difficult to eliminate. The major threats from this virus include: the unintentional mailing of sensitive information to people randomly selected from user's address lists (even where external to the company), and the clogging of the corporate e-mail system with virus invoked e-mail." ======================= http://www.mcafee.com/support/techdocs/vinfo/share.html This macro virus spreads by infecting Word documents in Update DAT File Microsoft Word versions 6.x and 7.x on Windows and Macintosh platforms. The virus consists of these macro names: AutoExec autoOpen FileClose FileExit FileOpen FileSave FileTemplates ShareTheFun ToolsMacro in infected documents. The virus becomes active by using the Auto and System macros shown above. Indications of Infection There is a 1 in 4 chance, after the virus has infected of doing the following activity: First, the macro virus will save a copy of itself. Then it will check to see if you are running Microsoft Mail. If so, the virus will find 3 random people in your mail list and send a copy of the infected document with the following subject: "You have GOT to read this!" If MSWord is launched to read this attached file, the receiver will become infected and above process will begin again. Warning: If you receive a message with the following subject or banner: "You have GOT to read this!", do not execute its attachment. Delete the entire message. Do not attempt to look at the macros. Both the Tools|Macro and File|Templates will activate the virus. The macro FileSave is copied to the Global Template file NORMAL.DOT. Once this has occurred, any new document opened will be infected. Method of Infection Macro viruses spread by having one or more macros in a document. Opening or closing the document or any activity which invokes the viral macros, activates the virus. When the macro is activated, it copies itself and any other macros it needs, sometimes to the global macro file NORMAL.DOT. If they are stored in NORMAL.DOT they are available in all open documents. At this point, the macro viruses try to spread themselves to other documents. Macro viruses spread easily through e-mail packages. The ability of these packages to send and quickly launch documents can infect hundreds of users at a time. Documents are much more mobile than executable files, passing from machine to machine as different people, write, edit or access them. Macro viruses can therefore spread very quickly through business offices and corporations. Virus Information Discovery Date February, 1997 Origin Unknown Length Not Applicable Type Macro Virus Prevalence Common ------------------------------[ <- Message 38 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970227 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 1997 18:16:20 -0800 (PST) From: Uncle Roger <sinasohn@crl.com> Subject: Cheap RR in Montreal? (Was: Land Rovers in US market) At 12:35 PM 2/26/97 -0500, you wrote: >more than two years. After that, it goes back to the dealer which will end >up sold at an auction for 20,000$. RR owners (and maybe Disco, time will Are you saying I could pick up a 2 yr old RR in Montreal for C$20K? That might be worth a flight out that way! --------------------------------------------------------------------- O- Uncle Roger "There is pleasure pure in being mad sinasohn@crl.com that none but madmen know." Roger Louis Sinasohn & Associates San Francisco, California http://www.crl.com/~sinasohn/ ------------------------------[ <- Message 39 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970227 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 1997 18:19:43 -0800 (PST) From: frank01@postoffice.ptd.net (Frank W.C.) Subject: Re: Land Rovers in US market I grew up with Land Rovers. We used them on our farm to haul manure wagons, for hunting, and getting to work in miserable weather. I have a series IIa sitting in my barn waiting for future restoration.(a relic) I like to look at it, dust it off, and reminisce about good times in the PA woods when my father, brother, uncle and I hauled out whitetail deer from some of the worst conditions imaginable. My primary vehicle is a Mercedes E220. For off road I purchased a Jeep Cherokee. Why? It has roll up windows, a 5 speed manual, no accessory crap and costs about 17 grand. I don't give a damn if it gets a scratch on it. Why can't I buy a LR like my father's 88? My "sport utility vehicle" doesn't need power steering, leather seats, auto trans, air, a cd changer, or luxury etc.! It needs Jeep basics and the ability to bust through the PA woods (deer in tow) without worrying about scratching that $45,000 finish. Wake up, Solihull! When you come up with another sensible vehiche, I'll become a Land Rover advocate again. Frank [ truncated by lro-digester (was 34 lines)] >truck, and the poseurs. > ajr ------------------------------[ <- Message 40 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970227 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 09:45:48 +0700 From: Tony Yates <a.yates@bom.gov.au> Subject: Re: Land Rovers in US market >Why can't I buy a LR like my father's 88? My "sport utility vehicle" >doesn't need power steering, leather seats, auto trans, air, a cd changer, >or luxury etc.! It needs Jeep basics and the ability to bust through the PA >woods (deer in tow) without worrying about scratching that $45,000 finish. In Australia you can buy a basic Tdi 110 Defender, with plastic seats, 3-door or 5-door wagon, or cab/chassis, only standard 'option' being aircon, which is more or less essential here, basic colours (white and green are all I have seen). BUT - they still cost AU$45,000 ! Cheers. Tony. ------------------------------[ <- Message 41 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970227 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 1997 21:56:08 -0500 (EST) From: Hank Rutherford <ruthrfrd@borg.com> Subject: Replacement keys;Re: Mark Gehlhausen Mark, this is a repeat of a message I mailed two days ago; In the British Marque News there is an ad for keys cut to match the code on your ignition switch. The name is Pete Groh in Maryland: his number is 410-758-2352 . Good Luck Ruthrfrd@borg.com ------------------------------[ <- Message 42 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970227 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 1997 22:06:45 -0500 From: rover@pinn.net (Alexander P. Grice) Subject: Past histories Brian Hanson wrote: >At least Land Rover seems to have learned from their mistakes and is >treating the North American market seriously. It's about time. I never ceased to be amazed at the string of bone-headed decisions British (ps) Leyland made, yet somehow the marque survived. The decision to abandon the NA market in '74 has to be the ultimate...at a time they could have *owned* the market with a little thought. This was at a time, as Dave Barry put it in this weekend's column, "the motto of Detroit automakers was 'we're doing all we can to make you buy foreign.'" Cheers *----"Jeep may be famous, LAND-ROVER is Legendary"----* | A. P. (Sandy) Grice | | Rover Owners' Association of Virginia, Ltd. | | 1633 Melrose Parkway, Norfolk, VA 23508-1730 | | E-mail: rover@pinn.net Phone: 757-622-7054 (Day) | | 757-423-4898 (Evenings) FAX: 757-622-7056 | | | *---1972 Series III 88"------1996 Discovery SE-7(m)---* ------------------------------[ <- Message 43 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970227 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Beckett, Ron" <rbeckett@nibupad.telstra.com.au> Subject: What if Spartacus had a Piper Cub... Date: Thu, 27 Feb 97 14:42:00 EST Bill Adams wrote" >If only, if only.... >If only they were LESS MONEY way back when, folks would have bought them. >Sheesh, it's not marketing, it's money! >Hey, if only I were higher paid, I could afford a new one now. Bill, I thought you were a 3D Artist/Animator Can't you make your own money? Regards, Ron Beckett ------------------------------[ <- Message 44 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970227 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 1997 22:57:24 -0500 From: "Brian Cramer" <defender@uscom.com> Subject: Re: Def-90 Spark Timing? Leland, The last mark is 12 degrees. I used the tach in the instrument cluster. Don't forget to disconnect the line on the distributor vacuum advance. Cheers, Brian Cramer 888-434-4678 office 609-273-9708 home '94 D90 (LRNA #1251) '90 RR County '73 SIII swb At 05:36 PM 2/26/97 PST, you wrote: >Hi, [ truncated by lro-digester (was 6 lines)] >Hi, >I have another question. I am trying to do the spark timing for my 1994 Def-90. >I just ordered the shop manual from Atlantic British, it does not go into >much detail on how to do the timing. >My question is, I can see the timing mark on the crakshaft pulley (I think they >called it the torsional damper or something), it has TDC (Top dead center) >marked in the middle, and tic marks on each side, with 1/2 at each end of the >tic marks. What does the 1/2 mean? The book says I need to time it to 5 degrees >before TDC, which mark is 5 degrees? >Also, the book says that I need to idle the truck at less than 750 RPM for >tic marks. What does the 1/2 mean? The book says I need to time it to 5 the >test. Do I need to buy a RPM meter, or can I just look at the RPM tach guage?, >I am going to buy the strobe timing light, but I wasn't sure if I needed to >spend 50$ on the RMP meter as well? [ truncated by lro-digester (was 12 lines)] >1994 Defender-90 >roys@cup.hp.com ------------------------------[ <- Message 45 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970227 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: ericz@cloud9.net Date: Wed, 26 Feb 1997 23:53:43 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: headlights On Wed, 26 Feb 1997, Alan_Richer/CAM/Lotus@lotus.com wrote: >Re: 80 bucks a pair for halogens: >Mr. Churchill is happily running halogen sealed beams >from Sylvania. They work great, drop right in in place of [ truncated by lro-digester (was 6 lines)] >but the American ones were built with sealed beams and >not the bulb/reflector combo of the UK type machines. On any non-military Rover I've ever seen, they run standard 7" round bulbs. These can be replaced easily with either sealed beams as Al suggests (non-halogen versions probably stock) or you can go with an H4 type setup. This is a reflector/lens unit the same size as the sealed beam with a removable bulb. The bulb usually comes standard as 60w/55w (high beam/low beam) but can be replaced (with proper wiring upgrades such as relays) with up to 130w/90w. Cost ranges from $40 a side for a brand-name such as Hella to $20 for various knock-offs. The usual caveats about aiming still apply, though. BTW, if you're looking for such bulbs, etc. e-mail me directly. Rgds, _______________________________________________________________________ Eric Zipkin Bedford, NY USA * ericz@cloud9.net * www.cloud9.net/~ericz SIII 109" V8 Hardtop * SII 109" SW (since new) * '63 Triumph Spitfire SIIA 88" (project car) * '67 Mini-Moke * '94 Car Trailer: "NOT FOR HIRE" ------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------[ <- Message 46 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970227 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: ericz@cloud9.net Date: Wed, 26 Feb 1997 23:53:57 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: Land Rovers In US Market On Tue, 25 Feb 1997, Dixon Kenner <dkenner@emr1.NRCan.gc.ca> wrote: >On Tue, 25 Feb 1997 DONOHUEPE@aol.com wrote: LR was part of a larger entity. That entity was far more >interested in selling MGB's, Triumphs and Marina's et al into the North >American market. This larger entity, BL, was really to blame for LR's failure in the US market. In all the ways suggested by Dixon, BL was a machine that was hopelessly out of sync with the times. They compensated in the US market by trying to force retailers to handle the entire line, not just those that were selling well. There are a couple interesting court cases from the era that deal with this issue. >> Land Rover could have been a major player in the US 4x4 market. The product >> was not the problem, management was. What was it about the corporate system >> in the UK which defied success? The corporate system defined the product. Indeed, the production lines were taken up producing the profitable LR....so what if they couldn't sell them in any great numbers in the states? A lot. As any modern car maker has learnt (painfully, from the Japanese) you have to have either no presence in the US market (really stupid considering the size) or a substantial one that provides sufficient service outlets. This did not exist at any time in the history of LR in the states. As an example, my father bought his 109" in 1959 mainly for the reason that it was well supported in Africa, where it was to be used. He wanted to be able to bring the vehicle into a shop and have it serviced without any major headaches. No American or Japanese product could offer that at the time. In 1972, he took another trip in South America and opted for a Dodge van. Dodge dealers existed in all the major cities of South America and he had no mechanical troubles that couldn't be handled locally. The next year he took the same vehicle to Africa and discovered the inroads the Japanese had made. LRs were scarce and the only Dodge parts available were leftovers from WWII! Land Rover had the U.S. product they needed in 1971! The Range Rover. From what I understand, much of the concept for the vehicle was derived from the contemporary Bronco. The Rangie was simple, rugged, had the power and higher level of comfort to compete with American Iron, but was never introduced into the country until it became a luxury vehicle. Same with the Stage One...its technology was available with the advent of the Rangie and it would have made an ideal product for the U.S. market. Naturally, that product that should and could have been produced in 1971 wasn't built until more than eight years later! Quality control cannot be cured by technology, and this is where BL finally killed itself once and for all. We all know the stories and no matter what was done to the design, this had to be cured....has it? I dunno. Today, LR is forced by economic realities of the modern auto market to move upscale. You can't sell large numbers of vehicles in any market without extensive dealer and widespread public support. Neither exists for Land Rover. Luxury vehicles have a higher margin and attract a more centralized market (really, in how many areas of the U.S. do people regularly buy $30k cars?) Allowing profit without such a large capital investment is the only way for a small auto maker to survive. I can't say that I like it though, I'd love to be able to buy a Landie in somewhat of the same way I might buy a Ford pickup. One that I wasn't afraid to work hard for several years and all the while be certian I had dealer support and a new one available when this one was shot. The Landie still has a superior design for many tasks. It is smaller but just as rugged and has an economy of space and adaptability that is still not equalled. Ok, off soapbox.... Rgds, _______________________________________________________________________ Eric Zipkin Bedford, NY USA * ericz@cloud9.net * www.cloud9.net/~ericz SIII 109" V8 Hardtop * SII 109" SW (since new) * '63 Triumph Spitfire SIIA 88" (project car) * '67 Mini-Moke * '94 Car Trailer: "NOT FOR HIRE" ------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------[ <- Message 47 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970227 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: ericz@cloud9.net Date: Wed, 26 Feb 1997 23:54:01 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: Door Seals??? On 16 Feb 97, lenny@fof.coracle.com (Lenny Warren) wrote: > >closed-cell neoprene foam laminated with Cordura fabric glued to the roof. >Only [ truncated by lro-digester (was 8 lines)] >Now, that sounds EXCELLENT! How did you go about it? I'm definetly >interested!! Works really nice...the problem is adhesive. The first version (which is coming apart now) was assembled with water-soluble contact cement. The last time I used the chemical stuff and the vapours nearly killed me for a few weeks after installation. The problem with the water-based cement is that it doesn't stick too well. I'm going back to the old, carcinogenic, stuff as soon as I get a chance. Rgds, _______________________________________________________________________ Eric Zipkin Bedford, NY USA * ericz@cloud9.net * www.cloud9.net/~ericz SIII 109" V8 Hardtop * SII 109" SW (since new) * '63 Triumph Spitfire SIIA 88" (project car) * '67 Mini-Moke * '94 Car Trailer: "NOT FOR HIRE" ------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------[ <- Message 48 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970227 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 1997 22:43:23 -0800 From: Franck & Naida Ergas <ergas@pacbell.net> Subject: ARB front bumpers I'm looking for an ARB front bumper with a winch (new or used). Where can i find one? '89 Range Rover ------------------------------[ <- Message 49 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970227 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Franz Parzefall <franz@max.physiol.med.tu-muenchen.de> Subject: Re: sick starters and dead batteries Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 08:14:28 +0100 (MET) Dave, | I can't believe you started with only a 42 AH battery. Mine is 800!! AH Hm! Sounds odd. I never saw a that big battery. Perhaps yours is 800 Wh which would be 67 Ah if it is 12V. | and you need this for a winch or for cold weather starting. Couldn't afford a winch yet, but a friend may build a mechanical capstan winch for me. BTW. After hooking the battery to the loader for a good day, Brumml fired right up yesterday evening. Maybe I just had turn the light switch to far and the convoy light drained the battery - Another backdraw of exMOD vehicles. Think I'll take the bulb out, soon. Keep the oily side down, Franz --------------------------------------------------------------- Franz Parzefall franz@physiol.med.tu-muenchen.de http://www.physiol.med.tu-muenchen.de/~franz _______ [____|\_\== [_-__|__|_-] Brumml, exmil. 1989 Land Rover 110 2.5D ___.._(0)..._.(0)__..- ------------------------------[ <- Message 50 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970227 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 19:24:30 +1100 (EST) From: Dean Cording <dean@holly.cbr.aspect.com.au> Subject: Re: PAP On 26 Feb 1997 debrown@srp.gov wrote: > Hello all... Just had an idea, Would PAP (Perforated Aluminum Plate) be > a good roof rack floor material? Seems that if you're going to carry it > around with you that maybe you should use it for something useful, no? Execpt that every time you became stuck you would have to unpack the roof rack. Dean ============================================================================= Dean Cording ASPECT Computing P/L 86 Northbourne Ave Dean.Cording@aspect.com.au (Work) Canberra, ACT, 2601, AUSTRALIA Dean@holly.aspect.com.au (Private) ACN. 005 083 670 ------------------------------[ <- Message 51 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970227 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
END OF LAND ROVER OWNER DIGEST Input: messages 49 lines 2171 [forwarded 214 whitespace 513] Output: lines 1611 [content 992 forwarded 106 (cut 108) whitespace 460][ First Message | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970227 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Back | Forward | |
---|---|---|
Photos & text Copyright 1990-2011 Bill Caloccia, All rights reserved. Digest Messages Copyright 1990-2011 by the original poster or/and Bill Caloccia, All rights reserved.
|