[ First Message Last | Table of Contents | <- Digest -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
msg | Sender | lines | Subject |
1 | "David Booth" [dbooth@in | 20 | For sale |
2 | William S Kowalski [7025 | 39 | Mid-Atlantic Rally |
3 | jory bell [jory@mit.edu> | 20 | Re: Good News...Bad News |
4 | rhodesia@juno.com (Chris | 29 | [not specified] |
5 | Paul Hanson ["HANSONPA@" | 11 | A Desiel Question |
6 | EvanD103@aol.com | 30 | Re: Coolant leak/hole in my head |
7 | faurecm@halcyon.com (C. | 46 | Re: 3.9 and 4.0 engines |
8 | rovah@agate.net (John Ca | 42 | Zenith Carb.Troubles |
9 | gpool@pacific.net (Granv | 32 | Re: Zenith Carb.Troubles |
10 | Jeremy J Bartlett [Bartl | 28 | 110 Oil Pressure Guage Operation - D90 Add On? |
From: "David Booth" <dbooth@innotts.co.uk> Subject: For sale Date: Sat, 12 Oct 1996 12:43:06 +0100 That`s it I give up, its up for sale. I look at it and don`t have an idea what needs doing! So if anyone wants it, they are quite welcome to take it off my hand`s.(for a price) For sale 1972 diesel lightweight for more detail email me direct at dbooth@innotts.co.uk I live in Nottingham UK (east midlands) ------------------------------[ <- Message 2 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 961013 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: 12 Oct 96 08:49:24 EDT From: William S Kowalski <70252.1204@CompuServe.COM> Subject: Mid-Atlantic Rally Since returning to Chicago from Penlan Farm, Buckingham County, Virginia, I haven't seen too many comments posted about the Rally. We want to go on record and say we had a GREAT time. Sandy, his hard working wife, family and all the ROAV members should be thanked for putting on the successful event. These things don't happen over night, it takes a lot of planning, experience and consideration for the people attending the event. We are planning to return next year; the 830 mile, 1 1/2 day trip (one way) was well worth the 2 days at the farm. And, our '67 109" IIA (Grasshopper) ran flawlessly. Upon leaving Sunday, we stopped at a roadside flea market in Fork Union and came across a Coleman cat heater; could have used it to keep the tent warm, but we now have it for next year. I took about 300 photos fo the trip, including the trip there and back, the people, the LR, and the dogs ( No dogs please----?) If anyone needs a photo of something, let me know. The showing of "The Gods-----" on Sat nite was a nice touch, even though I've seen it before, the flick seemed to have a new meaning (?) when parked with 132 other LR! I'm sure the theater lawn was well oiled for the winter. My only suggestion would be either a posted list of people attending or a big introduction ( I hate nametags, too) so we can meet the faces of the names we continue to see on the Digest, etc. A job well done!!!!!!!!!!1 Bill Kowalski Hinsdale, Illinois USA '67 LR 109" IIA '63 Austin -Healey BJ-7 '53 RR Bentley "R" (The last two stayed home, maybe next year) PS: Sandy, when do I receive my club membership infor I paid for with my Rally Registration, I want to attend the regular meetings! ------------------------------[ <- Message 3 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 961013 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Sat, 12 Oct 1996 13:56:16 -0700 From: jory bell <jory@mit.edu> Subject: Re: Good News...Bad News :over her Bronco II until I popped the question. She agreed to take a ride in :one...much progress! Then, she said that I could get one!!!!! Yaaahoooo!!! : This is the Bad News...I was shot down at the last minute. But the bad news :leads into the good news...I'm going to be a DAD!!!! ( This accounts for the :newly aquired income.) Our first of course. I'm still in school and will :graduate in '98. I'm in the Navy too, and upon graduation, I'll get about a :$4000 bonus, so guess where that's going. If it's a boy, I'll definately be :getting one! I have to teach my son the truths about 4X4's...ya see, I grew up :in J**ps. But I have since been cured of my brainwashing! I'd say it would be just as important (if not more so) if your progeny was a girl (unless you're one of those tailhook folks ;) ::jory ------------------------------[ <- Message 4 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 961013 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Sat, 12 Oct 1996 10:48:52 PST Subject: Re: Yet still another 88" for sale in AZ From: rhodesia@juno.com (Chris R. Whitehead) On Fri, 11 Oct 1996 09:52:29 -0400 GElam30092@aol.com writes: >Chris writes "If you are still interested I ahve an acquaintance who >has a [ truncated by lro-digester (was 19 lines)] >price kept me from purchasing it. Chris, what's he asking ? >Gerry E. >PHX AZ Gerry, He is asking about 10,000, but that of course is negotiable. actually if you want a Land Rover that is in great condition and won't need almost anything done to it then this is a good buy. I bought mine for 4400 and have had to put another 5000 into it to get it all fixed up. He has a saying that goes you can buy a cheap Land Rover and fix it up, or you can buy a good redone one, but both ways you are going to spend around 10,000 by the time you are finished. For a vehicle that has seating and trim in the original style Rhino cloth (all had to be hand made or colored), with a frame up restoration, great paint job that will last a good 10-15 years and still look like new, and a limited warranty that Marty is prepared to offer. Cheers Chris ------------------------------[ <- Message 5 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 961013 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Sat, 12 Oct 1996 17:13:29 -0500 From: Paul Hanson <"HANSONPA@"@mail.milwaukee.k12.wi.us> Subject: A Desiel Question Are the Land Rover 2.5 Desiel engines in the ser.111 88 Land Rovers suppose to be THAT noisy? I recently picked up a restored LR with this engine and I could not believe that it could EVER be so loud. If so, what in "tarnation" can be done to lessen the DBs? Thanks! Paul Hanson [ "Rover-un-works" and Renewed Trad. Victim]. ------------------------------[ <- Message 6 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 961013 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: EvanD103@aol.com Date: Sat, 12 Oct 1996 20:09:52 -0400 Subject: Re: Coolant leak/hole in my head A few days ago I posted the observation that now that my transfer box is fairly quiet the headgasket on my '73 Ser III 2.25l petrol engine had started to seep at the rear. Further examination disclosed that the seep was from the core plug at the back of the head, not from the head gasket. In retrospect I probably should have brushed it clean and smeared on some epoxy, but I thought I'd do it right. Off came the head, and out came the plug. It takes a few seconds to type that, but all afternoon to get that plug out. I thought it was a thin steel plug that would pop out with a large screw driver after driving the end through. But no, this sucker was a half inch thick aluminum plug screwed into the head, then ground off flush. I got it out, but not without damaging the threads in the head - they're pretty screwed up, no pun intended. In fact they look a bit like the interupted threads in the breech of a cannon. That's what happens when you drill twenty small holes near the outer surface of a plug to try to convince it to let go! To make a long story short, I'll need to seal the new plug with something more than teflon tape or gasket sealant. I was thinking of using epoxy (JB Weld is the trade name), but wonder if it can stand the heat, which would be approximatly that of boiling water I suppose. Any thoughts? Sincerely, erik Erik van Dyck Stone Mountain, Georgia ------------------------------[ <- Message 7 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 961013 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Sat, 12 Oct 1996 18:40:36 -0700 From: faurecm@halcyon.com (C. Marin Faure) Subject: Re: 3.9 and 4.0 engines A question was asked about the relationship between the 3.9 and 4.0 litre V-8 engines. I'm pretty sure they both actually have the same displacement. However, there are a number of differences in the engines themselves. The 3.9 is the final iteration of the original Buick V-8, which I believe started out at 3.5 litres. Thus the Rover 3500. Along the way, the engine gained some more displacement, electronic ignition, computer controlled fuel injection, and some other improvements, but the 3.9 was basically the same as the original. The 3.5-3.9 engines are great. But when Rover stroked it out a' la TVR to make the 4.2 litre engine that was put in the US-spec Range Rover County LWB, the engine's reputation went downhill fast. From everything I've heard from mechanics and owners, the 4.2 is a bad engine. The problem is that the block, bushings, bearings, and crank were not really strong enough to take the extra power. The result is an engine that is prone to head gasket problems, oil leaks, and can generally be a pain in the butt. In short, if you have a 1993-1994 County LWB with the 4.2 engine you might do well to think about trading it in while it's still running reasonably well. The County LWB also has the first generation, trouble-prone, air suspension, but that's another story. Rover solved the problems of the 4.2 by considerably redesigning the inside of the engine, including beefing up some of the internal structure, going to a heavier crank, and improving the bushings and bearings. The result was the basic engine that is used for both the 4.0 and 4.6 Range Rovers, and, I assume, the 4.0 Discovery and Defender as well. Although the engines are relatively new, my friends in England tell me it they are proving to be great performers, and both versions seem to be every bit as reliable as the original 3.9 engine, if not more so. The 4.0 gets better fuel mileage, but the 4.6 has considerably more usable power. In its original form, the Buick V-8 (which was actually derived from the aluminum BMW V-8 that powered their 507) tends to torque or twist its block under very high power loads. The reason it has been so successful in sports cars like the Morgan and TVR is because the cars themselves were so light. I would imagine that with the beefed up block and internal components, specialists can now get even more power out of the Rover V-8. Marin Faure 1973 LR Series III 88 1991 RR Vogue SE ------------------------------[ <- Message 8 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 961013 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Sat, 12 Oct 1996 22:32:12 -0400 (EDT) From: rovah@agate.net (John Cassidy) Subject: Zenith Carb.Troubles I rebuilt the Zenith carb on my Series III the other day because it seemed responsible for the poor running. Problem is, it's no better now! The symptoms are poor idle and "bogging down" with acceleration. When looking into the carb, the gas seems to be sporadically spraying out instead of a nice steady flow. This has necessitated running with the choke on a couple of times. Of course, now the plugs are fouled! The fuel mixture screw on the carb is having no effect on idle speed. On rebuilding the unit, all seemed well except for a tear in the "economy valve" on the top half. The spring that was supposed to be under the cover was also missing. Thought this might be the problem, but apparently not! Interesting that the accelerator pump piston did not "drop free," as was noted in two texts I consulted. I couldn't budge it! There is a small ball valve at the opposite end of the accelerator pump from the piston and it was moving freely. All passages were cleaned and blown out with compressed air. Float height was set. I'm thinking that the accelerator pump piston is the root of all the problems(especially since I replaced everything else!). Any of you experienced carb technicians recognize the problem!? In case anybody is wondering, points, rotor, and condensor are new and set, timing is roughly set, valve clearances set, new spark plugs with correct gap. Cleaned fuel bowl and replaced in-line filter. Tonight on the way to a friend's house, the truck stalled and almost couldn't be started. I hobbled to his house and we found no spark in the distributor. Coil lead was fine. Had the old condensor and put it back in and she fired right back up! Glad I hung onto it! :-) Thanks for any help! I really want to start driving this thing daily-it's a lot of fun! Cheers! John John Cassidy Bangor, Maine USA 2 Wheels: Ducati M900, Velocette Thruxton, Moto Morini 350S 4 Wheels: 1995 Discovery, 1987 Range Rover, 1966 Series IIA 88", 1974 Series III 88" ------------------------------[ <- Message 9 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 961013 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Sat, 12 Oct 1996 20:22:12 -0700 From: gpool@pacific.net (Granville Pool) Subject: Re: Zenith Carb.Troubles John, > I rebuilt the Zenith carb on my Series III the other day because it >seemed responsible for the poor running. Problem is, it's no better now! I'm no carb guy so can't help much. But I learned something which surprised me about the Zenith carbs when I was trying to get my Series III with a new Zenith smogged and was told that the carb had to be rebuilt. I was shocked and very dubious that the shop was being straight with me. After the rebuild the shop guy said he'd had to epoxy a couple of the plugged passages which were leaking and causing extra fuel to be dumped in at idle. I passed smog but was still doubtful. But then I heard from Steve Hedke at British Pacific that he tears apart every new Zenith, before offering it for sale, and does this to it because it's a typical problem. Seems that the Zenith used on the Land-Rover 2.25-liter engine was designed for something else and so has some reduntant passages that have to be blocked for the Land-Rover application. And apparently Zenith does a sloppy job of this. This is probably not your problem but you might send your message to Steve at British Pacific <britpac@aol.com> and see what he says. He seems to know a lot about this carb. Hope this helps, Granny ------------------------------[ <- Message 10 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 961013 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Sat, 12 Oct 1996 20:42:33 -0700 From: Jeremy J Bartlett <Bartlett@slip.net> Subject: 110 Oil Pressure Guage Operation - D90 Add On? I'm hoping someone out there with a 110 can answer a question for me on the 110 oil pressure guage. I'm considering the feasibility of adding the 110 oil pressure guage to my D90 but can't quite get enough details out of the parts and shop manuals to assess the possibility of the operation (surprised ? :) ). None of the circuit diagrams include the guage (is it mechanical???), but the wiring harness parts show a connection and the parts catalogue includes a"lead link". As I make it out the guage is an electronic device hooked to an additional terminal near the oil filter which requires a transducer and additional "lead link". Apart from that it appear that it would be a straight swap in based on the 110 and 90 electrical wiring diagrams. Can anyone confirm this? TIA cheers, Jeremy ------------------------------[ <- Message 11 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 961013 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
END OF LAND ROVER OWNER DIGEST Input: messages 10 lines 443 [forwarded 24 whitespace 92] Output: lines 394 [content 244 forwarded 9 (cut 15) whitespace 85] Land Rover Owner Subscription Information: * All new subscription requests are via the digest. * In addition so subscribing and unsubscribing, the Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) file and the last month of daily digests may be retrieved (by mail) from majordomo@Land-Rover.Team.Net Useful commands for this are 'index lro-digest' which returns a list of files available, as well as 'get lro-digest <filename>', etc. World Wide Web Sites start at http://www.Land-Rover.Team.Net/~majordom/lr/pages.html (shadow) http://www.Senie.com/billc/lr/pages.html If majordomo barfs at something, and you're convinced he should have understood what you sent him, contact majordomo-owner@Land-Rover.Team.Net -B[ First Message | Table of Contents | <- Digest 961013 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Back | Forward | |
---|---|---|
Photos & text Copyright 1990-2011 Bill Caloccia, All rights reserved. Digest Messages Copyright 1990-2011 by the original poster or/and Bill Caloccia, All rights reserved.
|