[ First Message Last | Table of Contents | <- Digest -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
msg | Sender | lines | Subject |
1 | PDoncaster@aol.com | 17 | Re: Re: Diff Damage |
2 | "Niel J. P. Fagan" [NF@o | 11 | Re: Speedo cable end. |
3 | Easton Trevor [TEASTON@D | 22 | Differentials and Broken Bolts |
4 | "Jens Vesterdahl" [jve@p | 23 | LR speedometers ... |
5 | DONOHUEPE@aol.com | 7 | Request |
6 | [@lucent.lucent.com | 9 | test, pls ignore |
7 | "Bobeck, David R." [dbob | 13 | Re: Differentials and Broken Bolts |
8 | "Gene Sparks" [galleryg@ | 20 | Off road video Free offer |
9 | "Bobeck, David R." [dbob | 14 | Re: test, pls ignore |
10 | Jeremy Bartlett [bartlet | 22 | Re: SII fuel gauge |
11 | Rick Grant [rgrant@cadvi | 29 | Re: SII fuel gauge |
12 | Rick Grant [rgrant@cadvi | 23 | Re: SII fuel gauge |
13 | ecrover@midcoast.com (Mi | 39 | Re: SII fuel gauge |
14 | lopezba@atnet.at | 48 | Re: Bores |
15 | jouster@rocket.com (John | 20 | fuel gauge polarity |
16 | Russell U Wilson [ruwst+ | 16 | Re: test, pls ignore |
17 | "John P. Casteel" [jcast | 25 | Re: Series Database |
18 | Daryl Webb [dwebb@waite. | 21 | Re: test, pls ignore |
19 | "Hugh Grierson" [Hugh.Gr | 14 | Re: Transmission noise |
20 | "Gene Sparks" [galleryg@ | 11 | 800 # for Pathfinder Video |
21 | James Wolf [J.Wolf@world | 35 | Master cylinders/silicon brake fluid |
22 | rover@pinn.net (Alexande | 18 | Re: Crack kills |
23 | jouster@rocket.com (John | 34 | a satisfied SBF user |
24 | Jeff & Laura Kessler [lm | 32 | 1973 88" SIII LR |
25 | Franz.Parzefall@lrz.tu-m | 19 | off for 2 weeks |
26 | marsden@digicon-egr.co.u | 28 | Re: fuel gauge polarity |
From: PDoncaster@aol.com Date: Thu, 12 Sep 1996 09:46:19 -0400 Subject: Re: Re: Diff Damage >immeadiately pull the diffs and replace the bolts. The advice was particular >to SIII. Does anyone know if this a common problem? Is there a reason it is [ truncated by lro-digester (was 7 lines)] >David Cockey >Rochester, MI The diff. on my IIa busted last week. When I opened it up, I found all 10 bolts sheared, and the ring gear (?) completely free. Peter Doncaster '64 IIa 88" ------------------------------[ <- Message 2 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 960913 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Niel J. P. Fagan" <NF@orc.soton.ac.uk> Date: Thu, 12 Sep 1996 13:29:47 GMT Subject: Re: Speedo cable end. Having just replaced mine, square at both ends, 30mins total time taken, it is a series 1 after all !Rgds Niel Views expressed are personal and not those of the University, unless otherwise & expressly stated. ------------------------------[ <- Message 3 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 960913 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Easton Trevor <TEASTON@DQC2.DOFASCO.CA> Subject: Differentials and Broken Bolts Date: Thu, 12 Sep 96 10:11:00 DST I too have sufferred the broken crown wheel mounting bolt problem including the schrapnel through the casing symptom. There was a thread some while back that mentioned a factory bulletin about replacing these bolts after a half shaft had broken. It appears that the strength ratio between half shafts and the ring of bolts is very close to 1:1 and the overload of half shaft fracture is sufficient to yield the bolts which then become loose and vibrate out . My crown wheel had all remaining bolts loose two in the axle casing and one gone completely. The failure happened on a dark rainy night and being unable to locate the source of the load bag I drove Miss Golightly the 12 miles to home, in true Land Rover Tradition, she made it with no further problems. later I found the gaping (1/2") hole in the casing and absence of oil. At least I didn't pollute all in one spot. ------------------------------[ <- Message 4 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 960913 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 96 15:17:56 From: "Jens Vesterdahl" <jve@phaseone.dk> Subject: LR speedometers ... Hi all. This summer I hauled 6 friends to the Skanderborg Festival as usual. This time we had a new guy with with us and apparently he hadn't been in a LR before (his usual means of transportation is a Yamaha motorcycle). After an hour of driving he asked me: "Is there a speedometer in this car?" Maybe I should have suspected something here, but as the kind and friendly person I am, I said: "Yes". Then he simply said: "Why?" (The car was filled with laughter here) That had me thinking for several seconds before I came up with a reasonable answer: "If there wasn't, there would be a hole in the dashboard!!" It's nice to have things looked at from a different point of view, isn't it? Happy Rovering Jens "SloMo" Vesterdahl Copenhagen, Denmark ------------------------------[ <- Message 5 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 960913 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: DONOHUEPE@aol.com Date: Thu, 12 Sep 1996 10:23:03 -0400 Subject: Request get faq a ------------------------------[ <- Message 6 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 960913 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: <@lucent.lucent.com:ben@bell-labs.com> Date: Thu, 12 Sep 1996 10:26:07 -0400 Subject: test, pls ignore testing, testing.. can anybody hear me.. Jeep is the best.. anybody there? ------------------------------[ <- Message 7 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 960913 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 96 10:30:43 EST From: "Bobeck, David R." <dbobeck@inetgate.ushmm.org> Subject: Re: Differentials and Broken Bolts Trevor writes... >>>The failure happened on a dark rainy night and being unable to locate the source of the load bag...snip.... Pardon my lack of knowledge, but what is a "load bag"? Dave "did you check in the ARB locker?" B. ------------------------------[ <- Message 8 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 960913 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Gene Sparks" <galleryg@techline.com> Subject: Off road video Free offer Date: Thu, 12 Sep 1996 08:10:42 -0700 I saw an ad in last months 4wd magazine for the Nissan Pathfinder offering a free Pathfinder on safari video so for laughs I ordered it. I received it yesterday and it was interesting to see that they are trying to copy LR at every turn. British accents and all. The video showed the PF in a variety of driving situations that any standard car could drive with lots of exciting music and scenery. WOW I was impressed ROTFL. But what was great was a free offer that came with the video. If you test drive a PF they will send you at no cost a pair of Bushnell Binoculars $54.95 value. And to top it all off the video is sent in a nice zippered canvas bag that I'm sure many of you could find a use for. If anyone on the list needs some binoculars and some cheap entertainment, here's your ticket. Gene USS Disco ------------------------------[ <- Message 9 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 960913 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 96 11:36:22 EST From: "Bobeck, David R." <dbobeck@inetgate.ushmm.org> Subject: Re: test, pls ignore >>>>testing, testing.. can anybody hear me.. Jeep is the best.. anybody there? You wanted a response, I take it? Why don't Land Rover owners go on the J**p list and write these kind of things? Because we are secure in our vehicles' superiority, and the Land-Rover legend speaks for itself... Dave "Yes I read the "test" messages" B. ------------------------------[ <- Message 10 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 960913 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 1996 08:46:09 -0700 From: Jeremy Bartlett <bartlett@slip.net> Subject: Re: SII fuel gauge > > The fuel gauge on my SII has never worked since I bought it. It always > > reads 1/4 full when the key is turned, full or empty. I've run out of ideas [ truncated by lro-digester (was 7 lines)] > > which I take to mean that the wire isn't broken and current is flowing. > It does sound like the gauge rather than the wires or the sender. Try extra cleaning of all the contacts. I had a problem with my unit reading when I was rebuilding Mathilda. What solved it was very carefully polishing of both the ground contact for the sender and the spade contact for the guage wire. I initially only cleaned them off with degreaser etc. but after polishing (0000 steel wool and dremel tool) the resistance at the contacts drastically decreased and the system worked. cheers, Jeremy ------------------------------[ <- Message 11 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 960913 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 1996 10:24:31 -0600 From: Rick Grant <rgrant@cadvision.com> Subject: Re: SII fuel gauge At 09:45 AM 12/09/96 BST, Richard Marsden, wrote > I had an intermittent >gauge problem when I bought mine, and ended up going over the whole curcuit >from gauge to sender (complicated by a changeover switch). I'll be doing that Richard. I've received some excellent advice on how to track this down but you raise a point about polarity that has been mentioned by a couple of people who have heard, but not verified, that the sender won't work if the polarity of the vehicle has been changed. When I did the changeover I took advice from both Rovers North and Paul Safari Components that the fuel sensor system needed no modification. As I said in my original post, the gauge exhibited the same behaviour before the changeover. I really shouldn't be speculating without doing a bunch of tests but, in your experience, is polarity a potential problem here? Rick Grant 1959, SII "VORIZO" rgrant@cadvision.com http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/cobracom Cobra Media Communications. Calgary, Canada ------------------------------[ <- Message 12 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 960913 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 1996 10:30:41 -0600 From: Rick Grant <rgrant@cadvision.com> Subject: Re: SII fuel gauge At 08:46 AM 12/09/96 -0700, Jeremy Bartlett, wrote I had a problem with my unit reading when I was rebuilding Mathilda. What >solved it was very carefully polishing of both the ground contact for >the sender and the spade contact for the guage wire. Well that's the simplest thing that's been suggested so far so it'll be the first I try. What has me a little worried is the fact that Lucas is supposedly just about the world's largest supplier of fuel sensor systems for airliners. Rick Grant 1959, SII "VORIZO" rgrant@cadvision.com http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/cobracom Cobra Media Communications. Calgary, Canada ------------------------------[ <- Message 13 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 960913 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 1996 13:01:55 -0500 From: ecrover@midcoast.com (Mike Smith) Subject: Re: SII fuel gauge >At 09:45 AM 12/09/96 BST, Richard Marsden, wrote >> I had an intermittent [ truncated by lro-digester (was 14 lines)] >polarity a potential problem here? > Rick Grant Dear All, YES, polarity is a problem... they should have told you that!!! If you have a stock SII with a positive earth system, all is well, you'll just have to seek out what part has let you down, and replace or repair it. If you have changed to a neg. earth system, you them must change to a neg. earth fuel gauge system. Only a few things get messed up when you go Neg. earth, and the fuel gauge and ammeter are a few of them *ammeter is easy though, just reverse the wires*. The fuel gauge system will have to be changed to a neg. earth type, as if you were doing an alternator conversion, same sort of problems apply. You should find the sender, gauge, and voltage stabilizer from later model, and install that, as the new system runs on reduced voltage of about 7 or 8 volts, not 12. In the SII gauge cluster, if you want to keep it, you'll have to grind away some of the cluster housing to fit the new neg. earth fuel gauge. The locating pins are the same, but the body of the gauge is bigger and requires that material from cluster be removed. It works though, and unless your freinds are really quick, no one will ever notice you made the switch. Our you can change the whole thing to the later style gauge cluster. * but that brings up even more needed changes!* Any problems, email me directly, and I'll explain it better. From: Mike Smith East Coast Rover Co. 207.594.8086 21 Tolman Road *Rt. 90* 207.594.8120 fax Warren, Maine 04864 ecrover@midcoast.com Land Rover Service, Sales, Restoration, and More Series Coil Chassis Specialists ------------------------------[ <- Message 14 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 960913 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 1996 19:51:26 +0200 From: lopezba@atnet.at Subject: Re: Bores Steve MARGOLIS <sim1@cornell.edu> wanted to know the difference between siamese-bore and spread-bore two litre engines. Basically it is like this: Rover found out that the 1.6 litre engine of the 80" model was not up to all the abuse it was getting from its users, so they bored it out to two litres. This became the standard engine of the 80" in 1952. For structural reasons, however, the cylinders in this engine were not placed equidistant, but cylinders one and two as well as cylinders three and four sat close to each other, while there was a larger distance between cylinders two and three. Thus, siamese-bore - two pairs of "Siamese twin" cylinders. While this larger engine provided a lot more torque at lower revs, it was not so good at cooling, since there was no space for water passages between the twin cylinders. Eventually, in 1955, Rover switched to a somewhat redesigned engine with equal spacing between the cylinders, and therefore improved cooling, which was called spread-bore. This was actually two-thirds of their six cylinder for their better saloon cars. I think the easiest way to tell which engine it is is by looking at the exhaust manifold; the siamese-bore also has twinned inlet pipes, while the spread-bore engine's is more evenly spaced. The 2.25 that was used later, btw, is a totally different design from both the 1.6 and the two 2 litre engines, which are closely related. Not that there is much chance to see a real siamese-bore engine outside the UK any more... BTW, Steve, could you send details of your 107 S/W, and maybe some fotos, to my favourite L-R person in the UK? He has a 107" S/W as his daily driver, and repairs and restores S 1's. He is also trying to set up a Ten-Seater Register. L. Stafford Dovey 173/4 Acre Rd. Carlton nr. Newmarket Suffolk CB8 9LF He got me some used spare parts for mine that I would have thought impossible (only about 240 107" S/W were ever sold in the UK). Regards Peter Hirsch SI 107in S/W Vienna, Austria (officially 1,000 years old this November 1) ------------------------------[ <- Message 15 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 960913 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 1996 11:05:24 -0700 From: jouster@rocket.com (John Ousterhout) Subject: fuel gauge polarity Rick Grant asks: >by a couple of people who have heard, but not verified, that the sender >won't work if the polarity of the vehicle has been changed. snip >tests but, in your experience, is polarity a potential problem here? The II-A (and presumably the III) gages are not magnetically nor electrically polarized. (They ARE magnetic and electrical, which is slightly different). When you change battery polarity, the fuel gage will continue working as it did before. Mine did. When I replaced the fuel tank with the later style sender, I discovered that it was not compatible with the indicator; a different problem. '64 109 diesel 5-door (Safari-SoGoody) jouster@earth.rocket.com (John Ousterhout) ------------------------------[ <- Message 16 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 960913 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 1996 14:04:29 -0400 (EDT) From: Russell U Wilson <ruwst+@pitt.edu> Subject: Re: test, pls ignore On Thu, 12 Sep 1996 ben@bell-labs.com wrote: > testing, testing.. can anybody hear me.. > Jeep is the best..vehicle in the world to get stuck in. [ truncated by lro-digester (was 6 lines)] > Jeep is the best..vehicle in the world to get stuck in. > anybody there? With a Land Rover that can pull me out??? Russ W. > testing, testing.. can anybody hear me.. ------------------------------[ <- Message 17 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 960913 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 1996 16:32:58 -0500 From: "John P. Casteel" <jcasteel@mindspring.com> Subject: Re: Series Database Dixon Kenner wrote: > What constitutes a parts vehicle? What percentage of garbage do > you really need to be holding onto when the rest is the most > worthless junk lying around (and if it is to far gone for even me > to use, I'll guarantee it is probably worthless... though I do know > people worse than me around here...) Hi Dixon, thanks for the info. A Parts car is one that you could still rob even one more part from. Destroyed either means that it has been hauled off to the dump or should be. I am trying (slowly) to track down all cars in North America. Though I have found that this is not the way to do it. One question that I wish I had asked up front is mileage. I will send out a private mailing to all respondants to get that information. Might be fun to see the average mileage for our cars. I have to get to the book store or library to read up on some of the people that you asked me about (in you unanswered E-mails to me.) So, I haven't forgotten them. They are on a back burner. cheers, jc ------------------------------[ <- Message 18 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 960913 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Daryl Webb <dwebb@waite.adelaide.edu.au> Subject: Re: test, pls ignore Date: Fri, 13 Sep 1996 07:59:05 +0930 (CST) > testing, testing.. can anybody hear me.. > Jeep is the best.. > anybody there? Hi Jan, Mailer problems ???? Hows the V8 109? P.S. I did get your message about the 4.4L, I'm still trying to avoid selling it....... cheers -- Daryl Webb (dwebb@waite.adelaide.edu.au) ------------------------------[ <- Message 19 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 960913 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Hugh Grierson" <Hugh.Grierson@trimble.co.nz> Date: Fri, 13 Sep 1996 12:23:54 +1200 Subject: Re: Transmission noise > \>Well, not exactly...reverse for forward facing hills, 1st for > \>backward ones. Not exactly likely to roll uphill...also you can > Um. How does the direction of the gear decide which way you'll roll? Yeah. Everyone knows it only depends on which hemisphere you're in. -- hugh.grierson@trimble.co.nz ------------------------------[ <- Message 20 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 960913 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Gene Sparks" <galleryg@techline.com> Subject: 800 # for Pathfinder Video Date: Thu, 12 Sep 1996 18:30:34 -0700 Due to an overwhelming response about the PF video and free offer here is the # for all 800 946 8632 Gene USS Disco ------------------------------[ <- Message 21 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 960913 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: James Wolf <J.Wolf@worldnet.att.net> Subject: Master cylinders/silicon brake fluid Date: Fri, 13 Sep 1996 02:04:34 +0000 Hi Ho Lads ! I have been looking into several things on the brake system of my 1966 109 SIIa s/w (under restoration). The first is having the master cylinders sleeved. The fellow from Oz a short time ago said he used stainless steel. However, the owner of a Virginia old car restoration co. said he uses only brass and has for about 30 years. Any one have any experience with these two materials? Cost is about the same as purchasing new. They come back ready to install. The second deals with silicon brake fluid (hereafter called SBF). The owner of this co.sent me reprints from the Jan-Feb 1994 issue of "Octagon" the American MGB Assoc. According to this article SBF isn't recommended for hydraulic clutches. This is due to the amount of air. The DOT 5 fluid absorbs. Any comments from SBF users? For the brakes it seems to be OK, although there can be slightly mushy feel to the pedal, but not necessarily. The second article comes from the October 1993 issue of "British Car". This one says that SBF has about three times the amount of dissolved air as glycol ie.15% v/s 5%. Again they say more pedal travel is required for braking. Now to something slightly different. They go on about the rubber bits ie.3 used: neoprene for brake hoses , and EPDM rubber and SBR rubber used in the seals. They say that swelling must occur in either type of brake fluid. SBF works OK with modern FPDM rubber, but causes SBR rubber to soften and swell too much causing failure of brake system. I would appreciate feed back from Landy owners that are using SBF. Pros and cons? What kind of rubber is used in our brake and clutch systems? EPDM or SBR? Who could tell us? Anyone from Girling on the Digest? Thanks, Jim Wolf 1966 109 SIIa s/w (Vicky) Portsmouth, Virginia, USA ------------------------------[ <- Message 22 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 960913 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 1996 22:24:13 -0400 From: rover@pinn.net (Alexander P. Grice) Subject: Re: Crack kills >>>I noted a small fracture on the exhaust manifold Lemme guess...from the rear topmost bolt hole (or vicinity) extending downwards towards the front of the vehicle. Now, was the "heat shield" fitted? *----"Jeep may be famous, LAND-ROVER is Legendary"----* | A. P. (Sandy) Grice | | Rover Owners' Association of Virginia, Ltd. | | 1633 Melrose Parkway, Norfolk, VA 23508-1730 | | E-mail: rover@pinn.net Phone: 757-622-7054 (Day) | | 757-423-4898 (Evenings) FAX: 757-622-7056 | | | *---1972 Series III 88"------1996 Discovery SE-7(m)---* ------------------------------[ <- Message 23 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 960913 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 1996 19:49:55 -0700 From: jouster@rocket.com (John Ousterhout) Subject: a satisfied SBF user Jim Wolf asks about Silicone Brake Fluid. FWIW, here's my .02c: First of all, I got several gallons very cheaply at a time I needed to rebuild my brakes (again). I've been using it in my '64 109 (single reservoir, unboosted) with absolutely no problems for three years now (45,000 miles). It shares the reservoir with the clutch. However, I did some homework first, that indicated the SBF was not as good a lubricant, therefore requiring silicone grease be used on all the pistons. This I did by rebuilding all cylinders with fresh rubber parts at once (no honing), smearing liberal amounts of the grease inside the cylinders and on the pistons, including the rubber bits. The lines were flushed with alcohol and blown out with air. Bleeding was normal (pun accepted). I have had good pedal since. Last year I checked the cylinders and found the grease still in place, with a little dirt only coating the surface, not mixed in. I occasionally find water floating in the top of the reservoir, which I remove by dipping a towel in it. I've heard and believe that the problem with our Girling systems has to do with condensation and absorbtion of water into the fluid, which allows hydrolysis and galvanic action to attack the dissimilar metals in the lower parts of the brake system, where the water collects. As I recall, the handbook suggests changing (drain and refill, not just topping off) every two years (if memory is accurate) when using Girling. I think this would also adequately protect from galvanic effects. With (expensive) SBF, the water floats to the top, with (cheap) Girling, it sinks to the bottom, to the wheel cylinders. If and when I run out of cheap SBF, I will change back to Girling, and change it annually. '64 109 diesel 5-door (Safari-SoGoody) jouster@earth.rocket.com (John Ousterhout) ------------------------------[ <- Message 24 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 960913 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 1996 23:09:33 -0500 (EST) From: Jeff & Laura Kessler <lmkessler@srnet.com> Subject: 1973 88" SIII LR This was shorted when I first forwarded it so I will try again. Date: Tue, 10 Sep 1996 21:17:38 -0400 X-Sender: garymead@mail.microserve.net From: "Gary F. Mead" <garymead@mail.microserve.net> Subject: 1973 88" SIII LR I got to test drive a series III today. What a differance from my 89 RR Person wants to sell it for $10.5K I am interested, but It has had some frame work runs nice. How does one judge the quality of a series ??? What does one look for good or bad? has soft top, hard top,2.2 l petrol no overdrive, new tires 78 k miles, new paint, rear seats, looks real nice I know that this is for range rovers and the like, but I see that many of you own Series vehicles Any help would be appreciated thanks gary mead 89 RR Jeff Kessler 1988 Range Rover Newport NH USA 603-863-7883 lmkessler@srnet.com ------------------------------[ <- Message 25 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 960913 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Franz.Parzefall@lrz.tu-muenchen.de Subject: off for 2 weeks Date: Fri, 13 Sep 1996 09:16:15 +0200 (METDST) Hi folks, if anyone misses my dumb questions and comments, I'm off to Corsica (la Corse) for 2 weeks of hopefully sunny climbing. Cheers, Franz --------------------------------------------------------------- Franz Parzefall tbr1102@sunmail.lrz-muenchen.de _______ [____|\_\== [_-__|__|_-] Brumml, exmil. 1989 Land Rover 110 2.5D ___.._(0)..._.(0)__..- ------------------------------[ <- Message 26 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 960913 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: marsden@digicon-egr.co.uk (Richard Marsden) Subject: Re: fuel gauge polarity Date: Fri, 13 Sep 96 9:16:42 BST > Rick Grant asks: >by a couple of people who have heard, but not verified, > that the sender [ truncated by lro-digester (was 12 lines)] > working as it did before. Mine did. When I replaced the fuel tank with the > later style sender, I discovered that it was not compatible with the > indicator; a different problem. The III temp. gauge sitting in my window sill is polarity sensitive, and I *thought* I saw a polarity marking on the back of my fuel gauge (could be wrong though). Thinking it through, and assuming the voltage stabiliser is correct, then all you *should* need to change is the gauge - swap the terminals if its polarised. If not, you don't need to. The sender should be okay, unless its got a protection diode or something in it (from what I remember, they "vanilla" potentiometers, so no problem). You can't swap the terminals of the sender, of course! :-) If the problem was there before the polarity change, wouldn't this indicate that the polarity wasn't the main problem? Richard (ex-Gurkha SIII 109 FFR) ------------------------------[ <- Message 27 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 960913 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
END OF LAND ROVER OWNER DIGEST Input: messages 26 lines 977 [forwarded 72 whitespace 231] Output: lines 755 [content 413 forwarded 46 (cut 26) whitespace 215] Land Rover Owner Subscription Information: * All new subscription requests are via the digest. * In addition so subscribing and unsubscribing, the Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) file and the last month of daily digests may be retrieved (by mail) from majordomo@Land-Rover.Team.Net Useful commands for this are 'index lro-digest' which returns a list of files available, as well as 'get lro-digest <filename>', etc. World Wide Web Sites start at http://www.Land-Rover.Team.Net/~majordom/lr/pages.html (shadow) http://www.Senie.com/billc/lr/pages.html If majordomo barfs at something, and you're convinced he should have understood what you sent him, contact majordomo-owner@Land-Rover.Team.Net -B[ First Message | Table of Contents | <- Digest 960913 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Back | Forward | |
---|---|---|
Photos & text Copyright 1990-2011 Bill Caloccia, All rights reserved. Digest Messages Copyright 1990-2011 by the original poster or/and Bill Caloccia, All rights reserved.
|