[ First Message Last | Table of Contents | <- Digest -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
msg | Sender | lines | Subject |
1 | CarDoctor@gnn.com (Rober | 19 | Re: 109 Brake bleeding |
2 | "Adams, Bill" [badams@us | 29 | Re: Rubicon Trail, Transmission Noise, and Mr. Lucas |
3 | "John C. White, III" [jc | 20 | Re: Vinyl stickers |
4 | "Terje Krogdahl" [terje@ | 25 | Re: The head came off! |
5 | "Bobeck, David R." [dbob | 16 | Re: Series III Brakes |
6 | whastelow@atlas.co.uk (S | 23 | Kenlowe fan fitting question? |
7 | whastelow@atlas.co.uk (S | 35 | thank, was 110 fuel tank question |
8 | M.J.Rooth@lboro.ac.uk (M | 18 | Re: Series III Brakes |
9 | "Bobeck, David R." [dbob | 22 | Re[2]: Rubicon Trail, Transmission Noise, and Mr. Lucas |
10 | "Bobeck, David R." [dbob | 17 | Re[2]: Series III Brakes |
11 | Alan Richer/CAM/Lotus [A | 5 | Re: Re[2]: Rubicon Trail, Transmission Noise, and Mr. Lucas |
12 | "Steve Reddock" [steve_r | 36 | 2.25 coolant pipe |
13 | marsden@digicon-egr.co.u | 26 | Re: Kenlowe fan fitting question? |
14 | M.J.Rooth@lboro.ac.uk (M | 16 | Re[2]: Series III Brakes |
15 | eheite@dmv.com (Ned Heit | 23 | Air Tools? |
16 | "Tom Rowe" [WI.Center.fo | 24 | Re: Driveshaft phase |
17 | Andy Woodward [azw@aber. | 18 | Series III Brakes |
18 | "Mr Ian Stuart" [Ian.Stu | 39 | Re: Series III Brakes |
19 | "Bobeck, David R." [dbob | 39 | Re[2]: Replacing bushes ala LRW |
20 | Alan Richer/CAM/Lotus [A | 5 | Re: Series III Brakes |
21 | Ray Harder [ccray@showme | 62 | Bye-bye, VWs! (fwd) |
22 | "Niel J. P. Fagan" [NF@o | 19 | Re: NO BRAKES |
23 | "Neil Jason Steinhagen" | 27 | Rear Wheels/tires |
24 | "Mugele, Gerry" [Gerry.M | 33 | Re: Report from Portland |
25 | "Tom Rowe" [WI.Center.fo | 21 | 88 shocks |
26 | "Benjamin G. Newman,MD" | 36 | Re: The Land Rover Owner Daily Digest |
27 | Darrell.Fremont@uni.edu | 12 | 88 shocks reply |
28 | Inkornoink@aol.com | 15 | Re: BRITISH CAR SHOW -- ILLINOIS ?? |
29 | "Mark Talbot" [Land_Rove | 18 | 3 Day off-road trip |
30 | Gregspitz@aol.com | 10 | Re: BRITISH CAR SHOW -- ILLINOIS ?? |
31 | harincar@internet.mdms.c | 16 | Re: 88 shocks |
32 | "Tom Rowe" [WI.Center.fo | 19 | Re: 88 shocks reply |
33 | "Tom Rowe" [WI.Center.fo | 16 | Re: BRITISH CAR SHOW -- ILLINOIS ?? |
34 | GNBull3@aol.com | 20 | Re: 2.25 coolant pipe |
35 | Wdcockey@aol.com | 20 | Re: riv-nut quandary... |
36 | kirkwood@strider.fm.inte | 46 | smog check II and LRs |
37 | Solihull@aol.com | 10 | Re: Bye-bye, VWs! (fwd) |
38 | twakeman@scruznet.com (T | 16 | non-LR /Guinness steak pie |
39 | Jeff & Laura Kessler [lm | 31 | British Invasion in VT |
40 | bb@olivetti.dk (Bent Boh | 22 | RE: thank, was 110 fuel tank question |
41 | marsden@digicon-egr.co.u | 22 | Re: Al and Steel |
42 | marsden@digicon-egr.co.u | 24 | Re: 2.25 coolant pipe |
43 | Daryl Webb [dwebb@waite. | 51 | Re: V8 - Engine |
44 | Daryl Webb [dwebb@waite. | 49 | Re: Diffs |
Date: Tue, 03 Sep 1996 06:27:36 From: CarDoctor@gnn.com (Robert Davis) Subject: Re: 109 Brake bleeding Hi All, In my situation all of the hoses were replaced with the slaves & the rear backing plate were upgraded to the newer style. When clamping off the rear hose no pedal is found if it is clamped off at the chassie end. The fact that the brakes don't pump up seems to show that the master if at fault. Rob Davis_Chicago Failure is not an option Not on my watch....... 1971 (88) Treeweaver 1965 (109SW) OX 1968 (109 three door) Dad's toy (only the caretaker) ------------------------------[ <- Message 2 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 960905 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 96 8:09:01 -0400 From: "Adams, Bill" <badams@usia.gov> Subject: Re: Rubicon Trail, Transmission Noise, and Mr. Lucas I guess you understand it all now. The endless repairs, the noise, the ungodly seats, the leaks, and the strange electrical system. Now your friends know too. Too bad it cost them 30 grand a pop. I'll bet they LOOK real good while engaged in the act of getting stuck or breaking things. Your story is not uncommon. For the last 40-odd years Rovers have been quietly going about the business of getting you there and back again. OK so you wasted your tranny brake. That was your fault for not checking that the driver knew what he was doing. Next time you'll know better. Small price to pay, but the truck got you home didn't it? Those Toys can't make that claim. Tranny knock may be anything from a bad U-joint to a wasted bearing caused by the orange-hot brake. The lights might be a bad ground. Check for short circuits first, a wire may have worn off its insulation. Your body damage is minimal. You can remove the galvanized cappings and the rivets and spot welds associated with that area and using a hammer and body dolly, simply knock them back flat. Then pop rivet everything back in place. If they are more or less cosmetic, some choose to leave them as battle scars. Bill Adams 3D Artist/Animator ------------------------------[ <- Message 3 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 960905 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 1996 05:38:03 -0700 (PDT) From: "John C. White, III" <jcwhite3@well.com> Subject: Re: Vinyl stickers Hi Bruce! As I said upon seeing it in Portland, I want one. It looks terrific and is a good way to make other LROs aware of The Lists. Cheers! John At 15:11 03.09.96 -0700, Bruce Curtis wrote: >Hi all, had a racing buddy of mine (who just happens to have a vinyl >printing machine) make up some reverse vinyl window stickers (i.e. for [ truncated by lro-digester (was 39 lines)] >SunSoft, Internet Engineering http://www.badrc.org/~brutus >2550 Garcia Ave, MS MPK17-202 (415)786-5147 >Mountain View, CA 94043-1100 FAX:(415)786-5896 ------------------------------[ <- Message 4 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 960905 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Terje Krogdahl" <terje@multix.no> Date: Wed, 4 Sep 1996 14:37:09 +0200 Subject: Re: The head came off! Dixon wrote: > > Speaking of fibre gaskets missing some holes, my engine has a small > > overheating problem after my rebuild... is there a way to figure out > > wether I have a gasket with missing holes? No? Thought so. > Apart from removing the head and comparing? Nope... Well, maybe. > Was the gasket a genuine one circa a couple years ago in mfg.? Original, yes, but not old. I guess it's ok. Well, I'll just get some cooler water for my cooling system :) TK 1972 SIII 88" 2.25 petrol -- **--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**-- Terje Krogdahl Multix A/S Phone +47 2206 2600 E-Mail: terje@multix.no Lilleakerveien 31 Fax +47 2206 2626 support@multix.no N-0283 OSLO, Norway Support +47 2206 2628 ------------------------------[ <- Message 5 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 960905 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 04 Sep 96 09:08:58 EST From: "Bobeck, David R." <dbobeck@inetgate.ushmm.org> Subject: Re: Series III Brakes >>>>The first press of the pedal applies the brakes after considerable travel. If I press them a second time they are beautifully firm with no sponginess at all......snip..... >>>>Does anyone have any ideas. Have you looked at the shoes? It sounds like they are worn. Either that or your return springs are on wrong. If you can hold them firm then there's nothing wrong with the hydraulic part. Dave B. ------------------------------[ <- Message 6 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 960905 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 1996 14:12:49 +0100 From: whastelow@atlas.co.uk (Simon Ward-Hastelow) Subject: Kenlowe fan fitting question? I have been GIVEN a Kenlowe fan for my 110 V8 (new and unused) Lucky boy! but I do not have the relevant fitting instructions. If someone has instructions and would be willing to lend them to me or fax a copy, I would be very grateful thanks _*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_ Simon Ward-Hastelow Orpington, Kent, U.K. whastelow@atlas.co.uk _*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_ ------------------------------[ <- Message 7 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 960905 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 1996 14:12:57 +0100 From: whastelow@atlas.co.uk (Simon Ward-Hastelow) Subject: thank, was 110 fuel tank question Thanks to all those who responded to my post regarding a leaking fuel tank on my 110. I've ordered a new one after some difficulty and much phoning around, and will be treating the rust trap before fitting. Someone may be interested to know that the early V8 110 tank is the same as the diesel version but the design changed in 1985 to put the fuel pump in the tank, mine is external. Somehow this alteration resulted in my tank costing DOUBLE the later version! but at 120 pounds (inc delivery) it wasn't too bad. next on the list is leaking swivel pin housing and replacement discs on front (will probably go to vented) WILL IT EVER END??!! see ya _*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_ Simon Ward-Hastelow Orpington, Kent, U.K. whastelow@atlas.co.uk _*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_ ------------------------------[ <- Message 8 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 960905 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 1996 14:12:12 +0000 From: M.J.Rooth@lboro.ac.uk (Mike Rooth) Subject: Re: Series III Brakes The first press of the pedal applies the brakes after considerable travel. If I press them a second time they are beautifully firm with no sponginess at >all......snip..... >>>>>Does anyone have any ideas. Have you looked at the shoes? It sounds like they are worn. Either that or your return springs are on wrong. If you can hold them firm then there's nothing wrong with the hydraulic part. >Dave B. How about they just need adjusting? Mike Rooth ------------------------------[ <- Message 9 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 960905 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 04 Sep 96 09:19:02 EST From: "Bobeck, David R." <dbobeck@inetgate.ushmm.org> Subject: Re[2]: Rubicon Trail, Transmission Noise, and Mr. Lucas >>>>Tranny knock may be anything from a bad U-joint to a wasted bearing caused by the orange-hot brake. Probably caused by the brake shoes rubbing against the drum. Make sure that the linkage hasn't been jammed into place by a rock. Also you may have broken a return spring when you ran it at 60 with the brake on. I did some towing this winter and backe dup in low reverse with the brake on. One of the springs gave up unbeknownst to me, which resulted in tranny knock that made me think my gearbox was exploding. Happened more after a long highway run, where the shoe had been rubbing and getting hot, and hence expanding. Removing the entire mechanism and placing all the parts in an old bucket, and then bolting the drum back on was the perfect cure. Cheers Dave B. Artist/Nice Guy ------------------------------[ <- Message 10 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 960905 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 04 Sep 96 09:25:19 EST From: "Bobeck, David R." <dbobeck@inetgate.ushmm.org> Subject: Re[2]: Series III Brakes u looked at the shoes? It sounds like they are worn. Either that or your >>>>How about they just need adjusting? Mike Rooth I just have one word for you, Mike... "hesaidhealreadytriedthatmate" Dave B. young whippersnapper ------------------------------[ <- Message 11 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 960905 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Alan Richer/CAM/Lotus <Alan_Richer/CAM/Lotus.LOTUS@crd.lotus.com> Date: 4 Sep 96 9:27:14 EDT Subject: Re: Re[2]: Rubicon Trail, Transmission Noise, and Mr. Lucas ------------------------------[ <- Message 12 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 960905 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 04 Sep 1996 09:29:06 EDT From: "Steve Reddock" <steve_reddock@uk.xyratex.com> Subject: 2.25 coolant pipe Hi all, Back in the old days when I had a 2.25 petrol lump I was always confused by a "spare" pipe which ran from the rear of the exhaust manifold side of the block to nowhere. Actually it curved forwards & sat on the chassis rail. A few inches short of the rad there was a bevel gear stuffed in it to seal the end. The pipe was about 1.5 - 2 inches diameter and filled with coolant. It stuck out at 90 degrees to the block, a little above the starter motor. Does anybody have any ideas what it was and if it should have gone anywhere? The vehicle is a 1973 series III lightweight, but the engine was the pale blue shade to indicate a military replacement at some time. I could never find a sensible explanation for it. There were (are) lots of round holes in the bulkhead, floor, seat base suggesting pipes entering the body. Could it be extra heating in an arctic vehicle? It only had the (useless) lightweight heater in it when I had it. It also had a few civilian owners, some of whom were quite adventurous, one was even moderately skilled (I can tell who did which piece of work depending on the level of bodge!). Cheers, Steve Steve Reddock, Xyratex | "NEVER QUESTION AN Ext.(01705) 486363 x4450 | ENGINEER'S OPINION, IBMMAIL (GBXYR96P) | YOU THUNDERING MORON !" Steve_Reddock@uk.xyratex.com | - Dogbert 1996 ------------------------------[ <- Message 13 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 960905 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: marsden@digicon-egr.co.uk (Richard Marsden) Subject: Re: Kenlowe fan fitting question? Date: Wed, 4 Sep 96 14:35:46 BST Its the standard fan is it? The instructions are pretty generic. Eg. mine is 24V 12", but the instructions cover 12V/24V +earth, -earth, and probably different fan sizes too. If they sound okay, can send a p/copy in the post (if I can find them ...). I ended up having bad engine trouble, and fitting needing doing urgently, so I ended up with a garage "oh, wire that up too, could you?". Richard (ex-Gurkha SIII 109 FFR) PS: A suspiciously similar SIII on the Gurkha Prog. on TV on Beeb2 lastnight. A bit tidier too, but I tihnk I prefer my hardtop rather than the Prince-Phillip-Mobile option... > I have been GIVEN a Kenlowe fan for my 110 V8 (new and unused) Lucky boy! [ truncated by lro-digester (was 26 lines)] > Orpington, Kent, U.K. > whastelow@atlas.co.uk > _*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_ ------------------------------[ <- Message 14 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 960905 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 1996 14:36:01 +0000 From: M.J.Rooth@lboro.ac.uk (Mike Rooth) Subject: Re[2]: Series III Brakes >>>>>How about they just need adjusting? >Mike Rooth [ truncated by lro-digester (was 6 lines)] >I just have one word for you, Mike... >"hesaidhealreadytriedthatmate" Meandmybiggob.Just goes to show you should never jump in on the first day back off leave....... >young whippersnapper Yeah...All fifty-four years of whippersnapper.Nice thought,though:-) Mike ------------------------------[ <- Message 15 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 960905 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 1996 09:41:58 -0100 From: eheite@dmv.com (Ned Heite) Subject: Air Tools? A gadget-freak acquaintance was helping me rebuild the winch mount on my 88 the other day. I had bought a piece of heavyweight angle, and wasn't looking forward to hacksawing it. Instead, we went over to his house, where the whole shop is run on compressed air. I was familiar with air-powered wrenches and air hammers that the Amish carpenters use, but this fellow was a complete compressed-air nut. He used an air-driven cutoff saw on my angle iron, and showed me a range of other air tools. Got me thinking. Could one set up an air-powered field kit on a Land Rover? Air-driven chain saws? Air-driven winches? Air-driven trash pumps? PTO-driven compressors? 12v compressors? I know you can store compressed air for field use, but it has a finite life. Any experiences? _______ |___|__\__== | _ | | --] Ned Heite, Camden, DE 19934 <DARWIN>< =(O)-----(O)= " " ------------------------------[ <- Message 16 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 960905 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Tom Rowe" <WI.Center.for.Dairy.Research@calshp.cals.wisc.edu> Date: Wed, 4 Sep 1996 08:54:57 -6 Subject: Re: Driveshaft phase > Theoretically, then, you could put a Cardan type joint on both shafts and it > wouldn't make a difference what the input or output angles are, no? Even then, I think there would be limits > Seems thats > why there is one on the front of the Stage One, couldn't get the axle and front > output to line up properly. But yes, that's why they are used. There is an optimal range for the angle that you want a regular LR type driveshaft to operate in. Tom Rowe UW-Madison Center for Dairy Research Madison,WI, USA 608-265-6194, Fax:608-262-1578 trowe@aae.wisc.edu Four wheel drive allows you to get stuck in places even more inaccessible. ------------------------------[ <- Message 17 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 960905 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Andy Woodward <azw@aber.ac.uk> Date: Wed, 4 Sep 1996 14:50:47 +0000 Subject: Series III Brakes >My 109 Series III Station Wagon has brakes (non-servo, single system) >that are driving me crazy! The first press of the pedal applies the [ truncated by lro-digester (was 8 lines)] >to no effect. My next obvious step is the master cylinder, a step I'm > hoping to avoid. Does anyone have any ideas. This sounds EXACTLY lik the problem I had when teh garage put the shoe springs on wrong - see my earlier post. Check the springs are on as per manual. Putting em on so both springs went between both shoes (normal in most other vehicles) produced just what you describe! ------------------------------[ <- Message 18 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 960905 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Mr Ian Stuart" <Ian.Stuart@ed.ac.uk> Date: Wed, 4 Sep 1996 15:08:49 +0000 Subject: Re: Series III Brakes Quoting Andy Woodward, from 4 Sep 96 > >My 109 Series III Station Wagon has brakes (non-servo, single system) > >that are driving me crazy! The first press of the pedal applies the... Three things: 1) are the brake shoes on the right-way round? 2) is one brake contaminated with oil? My 109 rear shoes are springed as follows: top spring: -||||---------||||- sits on the outermost holes, *behind* the shoes and below the cylinder bottom spring: ---||||||||||||||||||||||||--- sits on the upper/outermost holes, *behind* the shoes and above the pivot point. As you said, clamping the rear flexihose gave good, solid brakes. With this in mind, how can the master-cylinder be at fault? I replaced the wheel-cylinders and didn't cure the problem. I bleed 1 liter of fluid through the system and didn't cure the problem. I adjusted the brakes for hours and couldn't cure the problem. I put on an old set of brake shoes & bingo! My guess is the problem lies with contaminated shoes! ----** Ian Stuart (Computing Officer) +44 31 650 6205 Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, Edinburgh University. <http://www.vet.ed.ac.uk/> or <http://www.tardis.ed.ac.uk/~kiz/> However strong my opinions are, they are mine and no-one elses. ------------------------------[ <- Message 19 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 960905 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 04 Sep 96 10:17:54 EST From: "Bobeck, David R." <dbobeck@inetgate.ushmm.org> Subject: Re[2]: Replacing bushes ala LRW I have to agree with Dave, the Green Truck sounds and rides great. That's "Green Car"... Thanks for the compliments. I couldn't have doen it (at least not so quickly) without the help of Colonel Smith and several others -hey Bill- and most of all my good friend John who is 72 and lives across thge street from the garage. John was an airplane mechanic during WWII, and proved to be a valuable helper in the shop. He always knew what tool to use to do some awkward job that I didn't have the "real" tool for, like using a seal puller to remove the 3rd gear snap ring on the gearbox mainshaft. It was sometimes frustrating when he couldn't hear me or got in the way, but all ni all he made being stuck in the garage for the entire summer at least bearable. I told him I'd take him up to College PArk airport to sse some of the old planes... >>>>I had the privilege (....oh, please.:-)....) >>>>of helping Dave get things mostly buttoned up on Saturday. Dave has done a great job of getting a truck back together that was "vandalized" by five of us in April. Buggers really mixed up the old bolts, too...:-) >>>> I would have apprehension in doing a frame over by myself, where I knew where everything came off and was supposed to go back on. Apprehension???!!! Nah. I would say it was more like sheer mortification...watching itgo to pices in a matter of hours... >>>>My hat's off to ya Dave. Tanks! The real test is to see how long it lasts...shhhh! ------------------------------[ <- Message 20 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 960905 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Alan Richer/CAM/Lotus <Alan_Richer/CAM/Lotus.LOTUS@crd.lotus.com> Date: 4 Sep 96 11:07:29 EDT Subject: Re: Series III Brakes ------------------------------[ <- Message 21 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 960905 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 1996 10:09:38 -0500 (CDT) From: Ray Harder <ccray@showme.missouri.edu> Subject: Bye-bye, VWs! (fwd) if i hadn't found land rovers first, i would be a breadloaf owner. with a good editor, the following post could be changed from vw to lr. hope this cross-posting doesn't offend anyone cause i think it is appropriate and certainly fits... Sincerely, Ray Harder ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Tue, 3 Sep 1996 14:58:11 -0500 (CDT) From: "Joseph F. Fournier II" <jfourni@COMP.UARK.EDU> Cc: jwalker@UA1VM.UA.EDU Subject: Bye-bye, VWs! That's it! I've had it! I'm through with volkswagens for good! I've sold the '71! (Gave the guy a good deal, too!) I'm finished with these Volkswagens! They're supposed to be so economical and sensible, but we all spend our weekends pampering them...tweaking this, adjusting that, painting this, looking for this part or that. "Oh man! I've just GOT to have that $300 AM radio! And those semaphores! Hey, don't look at me like that; I'll get something that uses semaphores someday..." You're all a bunch of VW addicts. You know your m-codes by heart. You can rattle off the toll-free numbers of parts dealers in four or five states. You know the location of every part on your bus. You can spot an idle adjustment screw in a box of miscellaneous parts from 8 feet away...and you can tell if it's still good by looking at it. You go slowly up hills and wear heavy clothes to keep warm in the winter. I know some of you have gas heaters, but even those of you who do will crawl under your bus in the snow to check your valves (and now you're thinking "but I heard a bad noise in there"). Face it, man! You're junkies. You couldn't quit even if you wanted to! Your bus is the monkey on your back---hmmm...maybe that's why so many of you like that druggie music. You've all got a vdubaddiction! Not me! I CAN QUIT ANYTIME I WANT TO. I don't NEED VWs. I don't have to succumb to the peer pressure. I'm my own man! I can drive a Buick with pride. There! I said it: BUICK! Buick! buick. Come to think of it, you all need someone like me around to keep you from killing yourselves with this insane addition! Look at what almost happened to Bob Hufford. "I can do it, man. Just one more bus. Okay, so a cherry 23-window deluxe...but just one, man." All this and THE MAN is already breathin' down his back! NO INOPERABLE VEHICLES, Bob! You guys really DO need help. Okay, I'll go out slowly. I'll go ahead and pick up that '67 camper I looked at last Friday. But I'm doing it for you guys. I don't *need* this bus. I can quit *anytime* I want to. I'm not an addict! You guys, you need help, though. Hey, bustender, pass me that 13mm wrench. 8) Joe P.S. I know where there's a '62 Sundial camper for $400 (maybe $350) if anyone needs a fix. ------------------------------[ <- Message 22 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 960905 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Niel J. P. Fagan" <NF@orc.soton.ac.uk> Date: Wed, 4 Sep 1996 15:59:50 GMT Subject: Re: NO BRAKES Have a look (as already suggested) at the top return spring, it should be on ONE shoe (leading) and a post on the back plate. If on both it pulls the trailing shoe in (without adjuster to hold it out) thus no brakes. (This is for SINGLE double ended cylinder brakes, NOT twin cylinder double leading with two adjuster types). RAV4 as described by my Naval commander friend, (a suzuki 410 driver no less) a bloody girlys car, (suitable for cat lovers perhaps ;-) . Rgds Niel Views expressed are personal and not those of the University, unless otherwise & expressly stated. ------------------------------[ <- Message 23 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 960905 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Neil Jason Steinhagen" <njsteinh@eos.ncsu.edu> Date: Wed, 4 Sep 1996 12:05:56 -0400 Subject: Rear Wheels/tires After doing much research for a landy (i.e. spending many late nights looking at catalogs and Land Rover World Magazine while my wife tells me to put that 'stupid' magazine down), I have noticed that on some early SIIA's and SIII the rear wheels look like mail J**p with the wheels indented about 6 inches, (please forgive me for the comparison) while others fill the wheel well very well. Is this simply due to wheel/tire combinations, or are the axle lengths different. I much more prefer the filled look, buy don't want to sacrifice wheel articulation. And I loved the Rubicon story. Would've loved to see the Jeeper's faces! My brother in-law swears that his '94 Cherokee could run circles around a landy. I can't wait to get mine! Thanks a bunch for the expert knowledge! Neil Steinhagen -- Neil Jason Steinhagen ------------------------------[ <- Message 24 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 960905 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Mugele, Gerry" <Gerry.Mugele@wellsfargo.com> Subject: Re: Report from Portland Date: Wed, 04 Sep 96 09:23:00 PDT Ben says: > '95 Defender 90 Stn Wgn 4 showed up at Portland. True... Ed: the Blue SW with the Safari Guard bumpers. Michael McKeag's Stella and Peat (the two of them looking too much alike for Stephanie's tastes) And then Sunday morning over at the 'off road course' I talked to Jeffrey Wong and saw his white D90 SW. Sorry Ben, I don't recall the number but it was in the high 400s. He bought it in March. So we had 1% of 'em there... Gerry *** Don't worry about temptation, as you grow older, it starts avoiding you. ************************************************************** _/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/ _/ Gerry Mugele (Mugeleg@wellsfargo.com) _/ _/ Glen Ellen, California (415) 477-3952 _/ _/ "Gooey" '72 SIII 88 _/ _/ "Peat" '95 D90 SW (364/500) _/ _/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/ ************************************************************** ------------------------------[ <- Message 25 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 960905 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Tom Rowe" <WI.Center.for.Dairy.Research@calshp.cals.wisc.edu> Date: Wed, 4 Sep 1996 13:02:16 -6 Subject: 88 shocks I need to get some shocks for the front of my 88. I have Rancho's on the rear and they seem to have been fine. Does anyone know if the shocks Rancho makes for the 88 front are available in the US? And if they aren't, what will fit? I seem to recall that the Toyoto truck shocks would, but I can't remember for sure, or the PN. Any other heavy duty shock recommendations? Tom Rowe UW-Madison Center for Dairy Research Madison,WI, USA 608-265-6194, Fax:608-262-1578 trowe@aae.wisc.edu Four wheel drive allows you to get stuck in places even more inaccessible. ------------------------------[ <- Message 26 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 960905 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 04 Sep 1996 14:54:34 -0500 From: "Benjamin G. Newman,MD" <medone@iag.net> Subject: Re: The Land Rover Owner Daily Digest Fellow LROs: I am having a significant problem with my 1966 NADA wagon. I have recently had my neighbor replace the original booster pump that had gone out of whack. I got a rebuilt Bendix booster from Robert Davis with a rebuilt master cylinder, brake shoes, caliber and the associated pipes. Though this is an NADA wagon, I have removed the 6-cylinder engine an have replaced it with a Turner rebuilt 4-cylinder 2.5 liter petrol. However, the braking system is still the original. The problem that we are having is, for some reason, the brake fluid relief mechanism does not work. After a few minutes of running the vehicle, the brake fluid warms up, the pedal becomes stiff because of the expansion of the brake fluid, and the wheels, upon touching them after a few braking attempts, get too hot to touch with the naked hand. Despite repeated adjustments and bleeding the system, nothing seems to help. My mechanic friend contacted Mr. Davis, who said that this braking mechanism does not work well sometimes because of water getting into the booster pump.. I am wondering if someone could recommend some otpions here because, at present, my intentions would be just to bypass the booster system -- hopefully Mr. Davis will take it back -- and just not have a booster system which would (as I understand it) only make the pedal pressure requirement a little higher, but would not effect the safety of the braking process. As always, I would be most appreciative to hear comments of fellow-Rover owners. Benjamin G. Newman, M.D. ------------------------------[ <- Message 27 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 960905 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Darrell.Fremont@uni.edu Date: Wed, 04 Sep 1996 14:16:23 -0600 (cst) Subject: 88 shocks reply i got my ranchos through western auto. took a week to order in. they work great. darrell fremont 73 88sw "peggy" http://www.uni.edu/cet/STAFF/Fremont ------------------------------[ <- Message 28 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 960905 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Inkornoink@aol.com Date: Wed, 4 Sep 1996 15:58:23 -0400 Subject: Re: BRITISH CAR SHOW -- ILLINOIS ?? is there a british car event in northern illionis this weekend? if you know, can you please e-mail me details? thanks in advance, Hank Gregory 1990 RRC 1966 109 SW ------------------------------[ <- Message 29 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 960905 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 96 20:05:47 UT From: "Mark Talbot" <Land_Rover@msn.com> Subject: 3 Day off-road trip All, I have been itching for a while to do a 2-3 day trip into the wilds of upstate New Hampshire / Vermont. I have yet to really plan something, but I have been studying some maps and there are a ton of routes up there. My neighbour is from that area (Lancaster) and he knows of miles of routes that could be used. I would like to do a long weekend trip Friday evening to Sunday PM, camping out, campfire type stuff. Is there anyone out there up for such a trip ???? Mark ------------------------------[ <- Message 30 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 960905 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Gregspitz@aol.com Date: Wed, 4 Sep 1996 16:21:02 -0400 Subject: Re: BRITISH CAR SHOW -- ILLINOIS ?? British Car Festival on Sun. Sept 8 and Oakton Community College at the Des Plaines Campus. 9-4...come early for registration. For more info call the British Car Union 847-885-7789. Reg fee is $15. I will be there with MY DFNDR...1995 Black D90. ------------------------------[ <- Message 31 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 960905 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: harincar@internet.mdms.com Date: Wed, 4 Sep 1996 15:02:03 -0500 Subject: Re: 88 shocks Rancho RS5000s are available in the US for LRs. i have a full set all the way around on mine. part #s are 5163 for the front for 88s. Tim --- tim harincar harincar@mooregs.com '66 IIa 88 SW ------------------------------[ <- Message 32 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 960905 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Tom Rowe" <WI.Center.for.Dairy.Research@calshp.cals.wisc.edu> Date: Wed, 4 Sep 1996 15:48:19 -6 Subject: Re: 88 shocks reply > i got my ranchos through western auto. took a week to order in. > they work great. What are the part numbers for the front? Tom Rowe UW-Madison Center for Dairy Research Madison,WI, USA 608-265-6194, Fax:608-262-1578 trowe@aae.wisc.edu Four wheel drive allows you to get stuck in places even more inaccessible. ------------------------------[ <- Message 33 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 960905 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Tom Rowe" <WI.Center.for.Dairy.Research@calshp.cals.wisc.edu> Date: Wed, 4 Sep 1996 15:47:32 -6 Subject: Re: BRITISH CAR SHOW -- ILLINOIS ?? Anyone else besides me going from the Madison - Milwaukee area? Tom Rowe UW-Madison Center for Dairy Research Madison,WI, USA 608-265-6194, Fax:608-262-1578 trowe@aae.wisc.edu Four wheel drive allows you to get stuck in places even more inaccessible. ------------------------------[ <- Message 34 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 960905 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: GNBull3@aol.com Date: Wed, 4 Sep 1996 17:01:23 -0400 Subject: Re: 2.25 coolant pipe >Back in the old days when I had a 2.25 petrol lump I was >always confused >by a "spare" pipe which ran from the rear of the exhaust >manifold side >of the block to nowhere. Actually it curved forwards & sat on >the >chassis rail. A few inches short of the rad there was a bevel >gear >stuffed in it to seal the end. Sounds like someone attached a hose or pipe to block coolant drain tap, which sits behind the manifold. Is the tap drain still in place, i.e. the little valve you open and close to let the fluid out of the block. It's kind of a bear to get at and spills anti freeze all over the place so maybe somebody just ran a line from the tap to a more convenient location. Just an idea. George Bull 61 SII 109 SW ------------------------------[ <- Message 35 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 960905 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Wdcockey@aol.com Date: Wed, 4 Sep 1996 17:03:27 -0400 Subject: Re: riv-nut quandary... David Mercer suggests: >Take a bolt the same size as the riv-nut, with a nut screwed on the bolt = >insert the bolt in to the riv-nut screwing it in so thread is just = >coming out the back, tighten the nut up to the riv-nut put a socket or = >wrench on the bolt, and a wrench on the nut, turn the nut clockwise that = >should make the riv-nut compress. good luck! Tried that before and the one problem is the rivnut may turn with the nut. To avoid this put either a one size larger nut with threads drilled to clear bolt, or a length of metal with clearnance hole for bolt between nut and riv-nut. Then with one of three hands hold this nut/metal piece while also holding bolt and tightening nut. David Cockey ------------------------------[ <- Message 36 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 960905 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: kirkwood@strider.fm.intel.com (Clayton Kirkwood) Date: Wed, 4 Sep 1996 17:04:03 -0700 Subject: smog check II and LRs Hopefully good news to allay many of your concerns. I just got off the phone with the Smog Check folks here in California after a long chat with a fine person about the affects of Smog Check II. Vehicles must only meet the emissions requirements for the specific engine model and year. All of the engine parts related to emissions must be original equipment or optionally available or have a certification from the ARB (or some other body). Being a 1966 import my new 109 need only have a PCV system. It only needs to meet the 1966 standards. For engine swaps, the replacement engine must be of the same year or later and has the same requirements for components as above: what was available for the model year of the engine. It is not possible to put alternative components on even if the tailpipe emissions are better than the engine model/year requirements. He agrees this is most likely political as it doesn't make any sense whatsoever. The hipe about gross polluters and confiscation/crushing is truly hipe. He has never heard of a confiscation for emissions reasons and supposedly, a new bill has been passed which overrides any wording to suggest this kind of action. Gross polluters are gross polluters for the engine and year in question. So I could have a new 95 engine which doesn't meet the 95 emissions standards and it would be a gross polluter even if the actual output is considerably less than a 66 engine. Even though a 66 is putting out a lot of emissions, if it is under the gross polluter level for 66 it is ok. I think this is probably good news for those of us in California who had concerns about what SCII really meant. The truly unfortunate part is that we can't improve the emissions for a particular engine by putting an "illegal" part on such as fuel injection. -- Clayton R. Kirkwood, FM1-58, 916 356-5838 ------------------------------[ <- Message 37 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 960905 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Solihull@aol.com Date: Wed, 4 Sep 1996 22:23:49 -0400 Subject: Re: Bye-bye, VWs! (fwd) Hmmmmmm, Ray, do you think you could help me find that $350 bus. Its been a long time between type IIs, I need a break from the Rovers. I know the S3's not done yet, but are any of them ever really <done>?? Even EvanD103 still needs bits for his 88.... ------------------------------[ <- Message 38 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 960905 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 1996 19:37:58 -0700 From: twakeman@scruznet.com (TeriAnn Wakeman) Subject: non-LR /Guinness steak pie Sorry for the non-Land Rover posting I'm looking for a good recipe for Guinness steak pie. I had it a few times on my recent UK trip & liked it. There is something in it beyond overcooked steak and Guinness under a pie crust. Anyone have a good recipe to share????? TeriAnn twakeman@scruznet.com ------------------------------[ <- Message 39 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 960905 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 1996 22:42:45 -0500 (EST) From: Jeff & Laura Kessler <lmkessler@srnet.com> Subject: British Invasion in VT On 31 Aug 96 info about contact persons was posted to the LRO list by Stephen Margolisfor about the British Invasion in Stowe VT on 20-22 Sept 96. I called for info today and learned that they are expecting 550 to 600 British vehicles there and the deadline for registering to park/display your British auto is now 10 Sept 96 (was the 1st). Cost is $35 and as I was told the goodys they give you is worth at least that. Manufacturers attending include LRNA, Jaguar and RR (as in Rolls Royce). Stephen's message states "Among the classes of vehicles are Class R: Land Rover, and Class S: Land Rover and Range Rover (Current Series). For more information, contact one of the event coordinators: Michael Gaetano, "Ravenwood," 6 Pendulum Place, Hopkinton, MA 07148-2658 (508) 435-8007 (home) or (617) 237-4950 (work) mailto:maainc@world.std.com or Christopher Francis, c/o Ye Olde England Inne, The Mountain Road, Stowe, VT 05672 (802) 253-2106." BTW, I spoke with Chris Francis who is on his 2nd Range Rover, a 4.0SE. Jeff Kessler 1988 Range Rover Newport NH USA 603-863-7883 ------------------------------[ <- Message 40 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 960905 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: bb@olivetti.dk (Bent Bohlers) Subject: RE: thank, was 110 fuel tank question Date: Thu, 5 Sep 1996 08:58:20 +-200 Simon Ward-Hastelow[SMTP:whastelow@atlas.co.uk] wrote: Someone may be interested to know that the early V8 110 tank is the same as the diesel version but the design changed in 1985 to put the fuel pump in the tank, mine is external. Wrong, I have also mounted a diesel tank instead of the petrol, but I ordered a petrol. It works, but the difference is the air-out that is connected to the filler cap. On the petrol it is in the middle of the tanktop, on the diesel it is in the right side. This gives a strange behavior in my 110", when I fill the tank 100%, petrol is sendt out in the top of the filler stud. Best regards Bent Boehlers ------------------------------[ <- Message 41 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 960905 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: marsden@digicon-egr.co.uk (Richard Marsden) Subject: Re: Al and Steel Date: Thu, 5 Sep 96 8:46:53 BST Al is more reactive than Fe. >From what I remember, the lumps of Zn (also more reactive than Fe) are put on boats below the water line, so that the Zn corrodes rather than the Fe. K Na Ca Mg Al Zn Fe Pb H etc. (KNA-CA-My Granny At London Zoo Not FEeling ********) Richard > *** Resending note of 04/09/96 11:04 > Adny asked: [ truncated by lro-digester (was 23 lines)] > University of Dundee. Tel +44 (0)1382 344227 Fax +44 (0)1382 322318 > **************************************************************************************** ------------------------------[ <- Message 42 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 960905 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: marsden@digicon-egr.co.uk (Richard Marsden) Subject: Re: 2.25 coolant pipe Date: Thu, 5 Sep 96 8:56:59 BST > Sounds like someone attached a hose or pipe to block coolant drain tap, which > sits behind the manifold. Is the tap drain still in place, i.e. the little > valve you open and close to let the fluid out of the block. It's kind of a > bear to get at and spills anti freeze all over the place so maybe somebody Anti-freeze? You've got anti-freeze? LuXURY!!! :-) Yes, its nasty to get at - just below the exhaust manifold, so with a hot engine... Mine's getting a bit bu***red - probably the armoury of tools myself and the PO used to get it out, so I've just gone and ordered a replacement. L4 for a little bit of brass! I also have a hose that comes out of the cylinder head, at the rear, on the manifold side. This goes to the heater. I've just had to replace that hose. Richard (ex-Gurkha SIII 109 FFR) PS: When I get my temp. gauges sorted, and the drain tap replaced, I *will* have anti-freeze in there! ------------------------------[ <- Message 43 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 960905 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Daryl Webb <dwebb@waite.adelaide.edu.au> Subject: Re: V8 - Engine Date: Thu, 29 Aug 1996 09:37:33 +0930 (CST) Dieter Bothe: > 1. I find in the database of a petrol-station that the V8 engines runs with > "normal" 91 octane fuel unleaded. Can anybody confirm this? This has been covered here before. ISTR that the 8.13 CR motor will happily run mid 80's octane fuel. As for using unleaded... Well I and others do, but the conventional wisdom is that it wasnt until the mid - late 80's that rover got the metalurgy right, and that prior to this time accelerated wear when using unleaded is likely (and frequently observed) > 2. At the moment our baby takes around 20 litres of fuel per 100 km. This seems to be much, because she doesn't grow any more. What experiences made other V8-Parents? Sorry thats about the norm for mine too, frequently worse, I have friends with a new motor who are reporting ~ 15 - 16L/100K on long runs. > 3. I know there have been some discussion, but maybe somebody could give me a > summerize of how to reduce this extensive fuel-consuming (remember in > Germany 1 litre fuel costs about 1$) I sympathise, my normal daily commute uses up ~ 19% of my pre tax income The price we pay I guess. :-( Have you removed the restrictors behind the Carbs ? This is supposed to help. Is the cam OK, they have a tendancy to chew cams and lifters (Mine are totally US :-( Otherwise its a $$$'s thing, Higher compression seems to helps a lot (D110, with the same engine/g/box set-up but the 9.35 CR motor regularly get 15 - 16 L/100K) This is the motor in my friends stage 1. You can play with cams etc I guess. If the motor is in good condition (unlike mine) a good dyno (rolling road) tune including carb adjustment would probably be the first line of attack. Cheers -- Daryl Webb (dwebb@waite.adelaide.edu.au) ------------------------------[ <- Message 44 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 960905 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Daryl Webb <dwebb@waite.adelaide.edu.au> Subject: Re: Diffs Date: Thu, 29 Aug 1996 12:45:16 +0930 (CST) Steve Rochna asks: > Has anybody had any experience with positive locking diffs of detroit > lockers? After a few calls I talked to a company that said they had [ truncated by lro-digester (was 6 lines)] > stories, words of wisdom, etc... > Thanks. Steve Rochna '72 SIII 88 1st point, on an 88" no way. the manual for the original series 1 detroit locker (no-spin) did not recomend fitment to any vehicle with a wheelbase less than 110". Unless the ones you are talking about are *much* more progressive, the steering effect will be horrific. a series 1 locker is quite noticable in a 109 and makes the vehicle very twitchy as axles cam in and out. The new positive locking diffs may be a lot better, but make sure you get a "dissatisfaction" guarantee in case the 88" becomes undrivable. 2nd point. With an 88" you would need to be *very* gentle on the throttle as the ratcheting action is hard on axles splines and flanges., i've seen a salisbury axle snapped cleanly on a locker equiped vehicle (the owner was hard on the gas leaving a slippery road side (lots of wheel spin) and the axle snapped when it made contact with the tarmac (couldnt dump torque to the other axle). the splines and flanges certainly get a harder time with a locker. On a stock rover diff, which after all is not renowned for its un-breakability, you would want to keep all these things in the back of your mind when driving. On the plus side a locker does inspire confidence once you get used to the handling quirks (in a 109 at least) and makes rock-crawling hill climbing much nicer, they also make side hills a bit scarier. Of course this is just my opinion, and may be purely fanciful, as always YMMV. cheers -- Daryl Webb (dwebb@waite.adelaide.edu.au) ------------------------------[ <- Message 45 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 960905 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
END OF LAND ROVER OWNER DIGEST Input: messages 44 lines 1843 [forwarded 163 whitespace 480] Output: lines 1357 [content 772 forwarded 79 (cut 84) whitespace 445] Land Rover Owner Subscription Information: * All new subscription requests are via the digest. * In addition so subscribing and unsubscribing, the Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) file and the last month of daily digests may be retrieved (by mail) from majordomo@Land-Rover.Team.Net Useful commands for this are 'index lro-digest' which returns a list of files available, as well as 'get lro-digest <filename>', etc. World Wide Web Sites start at http://www.Land-Rover.Team.Net/~majordom/lr/pages.html (shadow) http://www.Senie.com/billc/lr/pages.html If majordomo barfs at something, and you're convinced he should have understood what you sent him, contact majordomo-owner@Land-Rover.Team.Net -B[ First Message | Table of Contents | <- Digest 960905 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Back | Forward | |
---|---|---|
Photos & text Copyright 1990-2011 Bill Caloccia, All rights reserved. Digest Messages Copyright 1990-2011 by the original poster or/and Bill Caloccia, All rights reserved.
|