[ First Message Last | Table of Contents | <- Digest -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
msg | Sender | lines | Subject |
1 | "Walter C. Swain" [wcswa | 35 | Re: Disco pricing redux |
2 | Lee Zeltzer [lzeltzer@is | 26 | 1995 D90 SW is a plushmobile! |
3 | Alan Richer/CAM/Lotus [A | 84 | Tutorial: Windshield Washers on an old Series vehicle...Why? Why |
4 | ecrover@midcoast.com (Mi | 42 | New and Old Rovers |
5 | Alan Richer/CAM/Lotus [A | 30 | Re: New and Old Rovers |
6 | jim@kidd.com (jnk) | 15 | Series II engine rebuild |
7 | "Robert Watson (CNA)" [a | 30 | RE: Range Rover Coil Wire |
8 | "Tom Rowe" [TROWE@AE.AGE | 21 | LRNA's disdain |
9 | "Robert Watson (CNA)" [a | 33 | RE: Why Buy a RR 4.0 SE |
10 | "Robert Watson (CNA)" [a | 35 | RE: Disco pricing redux |
11 | "Robert Watson (CNA)" [a | 11 | RE: LRNA's disdain |
12 | William Caloccia [calocc | 13 | [not specified] |
13 | "AMEDEO (Denver, CO)" [1 | 34 | Salesmen |
14 | "Tom Rowe" [TROWE@AE.AGE | 41 | Re: Salesmen |
15 | "Robert Watson (CNA)" [a | 49 | RE: Salesmen |
16 | "Francis J. Twarog" [ftw | 46 | Nice to be back |
17 | "William L. Leacock" [75 | 27 | Copy of: Half shafts |
18 | JEPurnell@aol.com | 56 | Re: Disco pricing redux and yuppies... |
19 | bcw6@cornell.edu (Braman | 14 | Tires for sale! (also need tire advice) |
20 | landrvr@blacdisc.com (Mi | 21 | Re: LRNA's disdain |
21 | jpappa01@interserv.com | 34 | Re: Errata |
Date: Tue, 26 Dec 1995 00:39:24 -0800 (PST) From: "Walter C. Swain" <wcswain@wheel.dcn.davis.ca.us> Subject: Re: Disco pricing redux On Tue, 26 Dec 1995, Alexander P. Grice wrote: Heavily snipped manual trannys and most *don't* want it. The local dealer has sold 40 Discos this year, only one of which has been a manual...and I'm trying to deal on the other...a black one. more snipping > I asked my source inside LRNA why a stripped Disco isn't offered...one with > crank up windows, manual everything, no anti-lock brakes, etc. The reply > (probably quoted out of some manual) is that the buying public didn't want > these...the public wanted the luxury. Sandy, I suspect that in the rarified atmosphere of what passes for reality at LRNA, the low percentage of 5 speeds they sell reinforces the idea that only luxury sells. The fact that the rest of the vehicle is loaded with gadgets is likely a non-factor in their thinking. A stripped vehicle with a diesel engine and (gasp) roll up windows would be perceived as undermining the cachet of luxury. As long as the plushmobiles are selling reasonably well, I don't believe you'll see real utility vehicles sold in North America. Hope I'm wrong. Walt Swain * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Walter C. Swain | wcswain@dcn.davis.ca.us * * Davis Community Network | 1988 Range Rover * * Davis, California | 1967 109 Series IIA Safari SW * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ------------------------------[ <- Message 2 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951227 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Lee Zeltzer <lzeltzer@isdnet.com> Subject: 1995 D90 SW is a plushmobile! Date: Tue, 26 Dec 1995 07:16:36 -0700 I convinced myself to do it. I picked up the Defender SW in Scottsdale = this weekend. After a jaunt through lower Phoenix I rolled down the = super slab to Tucson. No earplugs needed. The dual mode air conditioning is great; little levers under the = windshield, during the day when it's warm out here in Arizona, it blows = warm air, a night, it blows cold air; the blowing seems to stop at = traffic lights. Its amazing, can't wait for a our mild summers. You can = tell it's plush because it has two cup holders in a console with a = stereo that you can hear! Off road it's a Landrover, this weekend while others practiced pagan = rites at Christmas trees the rover and I explored river beds, no water, = just sand; this is the dry season. Next, snow in the White Mountains of central AZ. As was predicated by a some comments to my earlier posting my wife has = immediately offered me the Discovery she drives for this D90; no deal. Hope you all have a great holiday season. ------------------------------[ <- Message 3 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951227 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Alan Richer/CAM/Lotus <Alan_Richer/CAM/Lotus.LOTUS@crd.lotus.com> Date: 26 Dec 95 9:51:22 EST Subject: Tutorial: Windshield Washers on an old Series vehicle...Why? Why I know what you're thinking - Richer's lost it this time. Why would you want to put windshield squirters on a LAND-ROVER, for Heaven's sake? Actually, there's a lot of reasons to invest the 25 bucks and an hour or so of work. Keeping the windshield clean can be damn near impossible in northern climes because of the salt spray and crud thrown up by other cars, and that translates to less-than-safe visibility. Mud from other vehcles when off-roading has the same effect, so it's not just the citified types who have this problem. Also, if you do it with the part I recommend, you buy yourself a radiator pressure tank too, and can convert your system to catch and return coolant and cut down on the environmental mess your Rover makes, little as it may be. But, on to the task... First things first, make a junkyard run. The prize we want is the windshield washer tank and radiator overflow bottle from a mid-80s Toyota. The tank I used was out of an 85 Celica, and came complete with the pump built in. From what I could see, that same tank was used in all models of the Toyota line for at least 10 years and probably more. You also want to scavenge the washer nozzles and the rubber tubing from the donor vehicle, and get the power connector to the pump so you can do a tidy job of the installation. I paid $20 for the tank I got, but I think that was high. Negotiate - you can probably do better. On the way home from the junkyard, stop off at the auto-parts store and buy a suitable pushutton for the dashboard - should be about $5. Also pick up about 3 feet of tubing of the same size as the overflow tube on your Rover. We'll use this to replace the overflow tube from your radiator, plumbing it to the tank. Don't just reuse the original from your car - if it's like the one I had, it'll break when you take it out of the clips down the side of the radiator. Once you get it home, clean it up before you install it. I had to brush 10 years of old coolant crud out of the overflow tank and its tubing, so it's worth it to was it before you install it. Now come the fun bits. To install it and the nozzle (I used only one - second one will go in when the temperature warms up this summer), first bolt the tank to the driver's side inside wing next to the radiator. By a happy coincidence, my Rover had holes already available that fit the tank mounts perfectly - no drilling. I blieve these holes are already there on most older IIa vehicles - check and see.. Run two wires up to the dashboard area - one for ground and one for +12 volts. Bring these into the panel area, and tap the wiper power connections for power for the unit, putting the pushbutton in line to control it. I would recommend using green for the +12 and black for the round to observe the Rover color code for the wipers. Mark the schematics for your car (and you really should have them) with the changes you've made. NOTE: If you use the part I did, the pump is polarity sensitive. This means that if you confuse the + and - lines, the pump will spin quickly and will not spray. If this happens, reverse the leads at the pump connector. The nozzle goes into a notched cutout in the bonnet. I placed mine an inch back from the steel brace on the underside of the bonnet at the back edge and centered on the driver's window. The opening was not a simple hole, so you'll need to waste the metal out with a drill then file to shape. It sounds worse than it was - it only took me about 10 minutes to do so. TIP: Bring a piece of paper with you to the scrap yard. Trace the outline of the hole you remove the nozzle from, and then transfer the shape to the bonnet of your vehicle where you want it with a piece of carbon paper, machinist's bluing or whatever you find handy. Saves a lot of work figuring out what goes where..... Once this is done, hook up the hose from the pump to the nozzle and fasten it down using wire ties. Leave the loop at the bonnet long so it doesn't foul when the bonnet is put straight up. The overflow tank hookup is straightforward. Remove the old tube from the radiator overflow and replace it with the new tubing, routing it behind the tank and around to the inlet stub on the tank's cap. Fill the bottle about 2/3 full with coolant, and top it up after the Rover fills its lines. It's a quick and simple task, and well worth the few dollars it takes to do. Enjoy! -ajr ------------------------------[ <- Message 4 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951227 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Tue, 26 Dec 1995 10:45:22 -0500 From: ecrover@midcoast.com (Mike Smith) Subject: New and Old Rovers Dear All, Returned to work this morning to read the lists from the last few days. Seems like quite a line being drawn between the Series people and the rest. True you most likely will not get a warm reception at your new Rover dealer if you pull in with a Series Rover, but those people exist to make money. You and I, Series owner or Disco owner, exist to have fun with our Rovers. You can't put our values in the mouth of a saleman who is doing his job. You would not get a warm reception at a Buick dealer either if you pulled in with a 1965 LeSabre. We arrived at a Rover dealership in our car carrier once with a Series IIA 109 on the back. Now that rig, truck and Rover combined cost me well over 45,000, but the saleman looked at the 109 as if we should be hauling it to the dump, not to the shop for work, and looked at us like we didn't have two nickels to rub together, so I understand your anger, but I don't think it is a Rover problem. It is a dealership, just need to make a buck problem, Rover, Ford, Jaguar, all makes. Not to defend the saleman, but if you were a fan of a 1957 Chevy Bel-Air Conv., and went to ask for parts or tech. advise from your local Chevy dealer, they would laugh in your face. Nowhere in the job description does it say that you have to know trucks to sell them. I went and looked at new Ford F-350's the other day to replace our car carrier, and the saleman knew nothing about the vehicles, not even what the mileage was on the Turbo diesel models. You would think that would be a FAQ. So although 9 times out of 10 I agree that saleman should know their product better, and be more helpful to all, I don't think it is going to happen in a business as large as LRNA. They are, and have to be, in it to make a profit. Rovers are our hobby, and their job. I don't think we'll ever change that. We should be glad that the company is actually as cool as it really is, supporting off road adventures, off road schools, and even some rallies, etc. etc. So let, as another emailer said,...the people who need to prove their status, and to prove to their girlfreinds that they are *real men*, drive and pamper their never off road D90's and Disco's, and few years down the line we'll all have clean low mileage models to pick from for our expeditions into the world of Rovers that they will never know. Mike Smith, ECR ------------------------------[ <- Message 5 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951227 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Alan Richer/CAM/Lotus <Alan_Richer/CAM/Lotus.LOTUS@crd.lotus.com> Date: 26 Dec 95 11:28:44 EST Subject: Re: New and Old Rovers Re: Animosity and "party lines": No animosity here, just like to get the facts straight. Re: older vehicle parts and service support: > Not to defend the saleman, but if you were a fan of a 1957 Chevy >Bel-Air Conv., and went to ask for parts or tech. advise from your local >Chevy dealer, they would laugh in your face. Gotta argue with you on this one, Mike. GM and many of the other car manufacturers maintain parts availability for the "classics" as they're known. I can walk into any Chevy dealership on the planet and either get or order many parts for older vehicles. Been there, done it. Can't do that with Japanese or most other foreign lines, though Rover and their public disdain for their older product annoys me on a personal level. Also, Jag and other "expensive" car lines do so for their older vehicles. Look at Lotus (not the one I work for, the car company). They still make and sell parts for their older vehicles and support replica manufacturers (such as Caterham). aj" Not a yuppie - never was..."r ------------------------------[ <- Message 6 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951227 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Tue, 26 Dec 1995 13:06:51 -0400 From: jim@kidd.com (jnk) Subject: Series II engine rebuild My father and I are in the midst of rebuilding a 1960 SII engine. This weekend while getting ready to replace the main bearings we noticed that the retainer clip thing was on the opposite side. After flip flopping the part and wondering where we went wrong we noticed in a catalog that the SII used different main bearings. Is there anything else we should know before continuing with the rebuild. We are currently on hold awaiting new bearings. Jim Karantinos (Tallahassee, Fl) ------------------------------[ <- Message 7 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951227 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Robert Watson (CNA)" <a-robw@microsoft.com> Subject: RE: Range Rover Coil Wire Date: Tue, 26 Dec 1995 10:09:05 -0800 I was under the hood of my Disco the other day and noticed the same thing. I put piece of that plastic wire loom material aroud it. You'd think that in the 6 yrs between your 89 and my 95 they'd have come up with a better arrangement. Then again, there's that Lucas heritage to consider. :-) Happy holidays to all! ---------- From: KKelly6788@aol.com[SMTP:KKelly6788@aol.com] I noticed that the coil wire of my '89 Range Rover with a 3.9L V8 was rubbing against the heat shield behind the alternator. I put a piece of rubber over the wire to stop the wear. I mentioned this to a Land Rover mechanic and he said it was a common problem. I hope everyone has a great Christmas. _____ /|__|_\__(| Bob Watson | | | \ a-robw@microsoft.com |---|___|___\____ Mountlake Terrace, WA, USA | _|= |= |o_ }\ [|_/_ \__|___|/_\_}| '95 Beluga Black Discovery \_/ \_/ N7UMU ------------------------------[ <- Message 8 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951227 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Tom Rowe" <TROWE@AE.AGECON.WISC.EDU> Date: Tue, 26 Dec 1995 12:16:44 GMT -0600 Subject: LRNA's disdain Interesting, the thread on showroom disdain for Series vehicles. Gee, wonder what would happen if I parked my topless camo lightweight in front of a dealer's showroom? I'm tempted ;-) Anyway, if there's that much dislike for the series models, I wonder why they talk about the LR heritage in the sales brochures, with a photo of series model? Tom Rowe UW-Madison Center for Dairy Research 608-265-6194, Fax:608-262-1578 trowe@ae.agecon.wisc.edu Four wheel drive allows you to get stuck in places even more inaccessible. ------------------------------[ <- Message 9 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951227 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Robert Watson (CNA)" <a-robw@microsoft.com> Subject: RE: Why Buy a RR 4.0 SE Date: Tue, 26 Dec 1995 10:50:08 -0800 >From: A D. Cobb[SMTP:71643.2453@compuserve.com] >Hello All, <snip> > I have a couple of friends who think I should get a Chevy Tahoe or GMC >Yukon. No question they are cheaper than the RR, however I'm looking for the >best 4WD, not the cheapest. I live in the middle of heavy snow country ( snow >belt of upstate NY... 50" so far in December ) so I am interested in winter >performance/traction. I would think that in New York, the "traction control" and ABS brakes in addition to the superior off-road capabilities and interior appointments of the RR would be hard for a GM enthusiast to counter. I don't think GM offers anything like that (a limited slip rear-end isn't anywhere near 4-wheel traction control). If you are pulling trailers and/or like the power of the 'burban, you might want to look at the 4.6 HSE. > Can you nice folks give me some ammo to toss at my pals as to why the RR >is the best ? Good luck with your new vehicle. _____ /|__|_\__(| Bob Watson | | | \ a-robw@microsoft.com |---|___|___\____ Mountlake Terrace, WA, USA | _|= |= |o_ }\ [|_/_ \__|___|/_\_}| '95 Beluga Black Discovery \_/ \_/ N7UMU ------------------------------[ <- Message 10 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951227 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Robert Watson (CNA)" <a-robw@microsoft.com> Subject: RE: Disco pricing redux Date: Tue, 26 Dec 1995 10:42:08 -0800 >From: rover@pinn.net[SMTP:rover@pinn.net] <snip> >-The beluga black paint is the hardest to keep looking good (that's why it's >clear coated). However, it is the easiest to touch up. That's good to know! :-) >I dunno. If you could get it past EPA, I think a stripper 300 TDi would be >*perfect* for this market. Vinyl seats, hose-out interior, manual >everything. I'm sure that a fleet version of the Disco is offered in the >UK. Could anyone across the pond enlighten us as to the difference between >the top of the line and bottom end prices? I'd trade my "plushmobile" in on one in a second! Then I could go and (ab)use it with a much lighter burden on my concience (i.e. wallet). Maybe that's what will be offered next year in place of the D90 in the NA market. They could capitalize on the Camel Trophy image! Even offer CT Yellow/Orange as a color. I bet they could sell as many of them as they did D90 SW's. (Yea, I know. Fat chance! It does go seriously against the 'refined' LR owner image held by LRNA, but I can dream, can't I?) _____ /|__|_\__(| Bob Watson | | | \ a-robw@microsoft.com |---|___|___\____ Mountlake Terrace, WA, USA | _|= |= |o_ }\ [|_/_ \__|___|/_\_}| '95 Beluga Black Discovery \_/ \_/ N7UMU ------------------------------[ <- Message 11 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951227 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Robert Watson (CNA)" <a-robw@microsoft.com> Subject: RE: LRNA's disdain Date: Tue, 26 Dec 1995 10:56:02 -0800 >From: Tom Rowe[SMTP:TROWE@AE.AGECON.WISC.EDU] >Interesting, the thread on showroom disdain for Series vehicles. Gee, >wonder what would happen if I parked my topless camo lightweight in >front of a dealer's showroom? I'm tempted ;-) Be sure to wear your flak jacket! ------------------------------[ <- Message 12 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951227 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Subject: snow-plough and PTFE Date: Tue, 26 Dec 1995 14:01:38 -0500 From: William Caloccia <caloccia@OpenMarket.com> Lloyd Allison <lloyd@cs.monash.edu.au> writes about: snow-plough and PTFE Yes Lloyd, you got the combination absolutely totally correct the best place on a Land-Rover for PTFE is on the surface of the snow-plow so that the snow doesn't get hung up on and pack onto the surface of the plow. Cheers, -Bill ------------------------------[ <- Message 13 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951227 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: 26 Dec 95 14:00:45 EST From: "AMEDEO (Denver, CO)" <102505.3511@compuserve.com> Subject: Salesmen To the Series people, let's make peace! Even Israel and the PLO did it! O.K. next time a Series person comes in I'll treat him like he owns the place. Seriously, I agree we can learn from each other. Just understand that a modern LR dealership is there to push the current product lines. But why can't you accept that these so called plushmobiles are still real Land-Rovers, made in Soulihull? Also, don't play so poor: when you add the cost of your antiques plus parts plus repairs (time you spend times your wage rate) they don't cost much less than a spanking new Discovery per mile. BTW sincere thanks to Larry Smith and Alan Richer for their comments. To Jim Pappas: have some more backbone. Salesmen can be professionals too. Let's defend our profession. And my name is not "the other guy". I am even a Gold Grenadier like you, look in the list. Friends? To Sandy Grice: after the newly found respect I wanted to give to Series people I am somewhat disappointed about some inaccuracies in your message: mark-ups of 15-16% on Discoveries? More like 10-12% and that does not make any provisions for overhead. This is gross profit. We get no rebates like most other automobile dealers -engines: 95 Disco with 4.0 and 4.6 liter engines????? 95 has 3.9, 96 has 4.0! Sales plug: we have another Defender 110, with winch and 50k miles. And sorry, it is about 39K asking price. The last one we had (with 20k miles) sold for 46K. It's not my fault. Amedeo 87RR ------------------------------[ <- Message 14 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951227 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Tom Rowe" <TROWE@AE.AGECON.WISC.EDU> Date: Tue, 26 Dec 1995 14:08:37 GMT -0600 Subject: Re: Salesmen Amedeo writes: Snip > Also, don't play so poor: when you add the > cost of your antiques plus parts plus repairs (time you spend times your wage > rate) they don't cost much less than a spanking new Discovery per mile. Snip Well, that's not exactly an accurate figure. I work 40 hrs per week and am not allowed overtime and I don't take time off to work on my LR. So it's not accurate to figure my repairs x my hourly rate (which is much less than a garage charges anyway) because I couldn't be earning that elsewhere. Also, I enjoy tinkering with my LR, it's a kind of hobby and most of the times I find it a rather relaxing mindless activity. Zen auto repair? I paid $3,600 for my Lightweight and even adding the cost of a rebuilt engine (which it's needed for 4 years) I haven't spent anywhere near the cost of a new LR per mile. THe total is less than $10,000, way less than $15,000 even if you count labor at my present rate (which is higher now than it was when I've done most of my repairs). PLUS, I can fix anything that goes wrong with my Series LR. There's things I probably wouldn't attempt on a new one, unless it were a diesel. Having said all that, I'd probably buy a D110 if they were available and I could afford one (I'd like to offer a bit more comfort to my wife and son) But I'll have to settle for restoring my '67 109. Tom Rowe UW-Madison Center for Dairy Research 608-265-6194, Fax:608-262-1578 trowe@ae.agecon.wisc.edu Four wheel drive allows you to get stuck in places even more inaccessible. ------------------------------[ <- Message 15 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951227 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Robert Watson (CNA)" <a-robw@microsoft.com> Subject: RE: Salesmen Date: Tue, 26 Dec 1995 12:51:05 -0800 I have to confess that after reading your first posting, I was seriously tempted to fling another "salesman bashing" e-mail onto the heap, since it did sound a bit on the arrogant side. (e.g. "Whatever you guys do in your jobs you must make great profits because you are able to afford these expensive machines. So don't gives us any crap about making a profit when selling you these toys. People who live in glass houses should not throw stones" and that goes for you lawyers, doctors, and miscellaneous high priced consultants." I guess I fall in to the "miscellaneous high priced consultant" category and I don't consider this a very friendly way to address your market segment.) However, as is too easy to do in the e-mail, I suspect your original posting did not accurately represent your views. Unfortunately for you, "Car Salesman" has become equated with "Bad/Pushy/obnoxious/un-informed/(pick-your-own-derrogatory-adjective) salesman" in the minds of many. In my experience, I've met more LR salespeople who are interested and knowledgable about the product than any other single automotive brand. (Of course I've met many who are clueless order-takers as well). If you are the former case, then you are truely a professional and there's nothing to be ashamed or defensive about. Likewise, those "car-salesman" bashing comments that fly through here occasionally aren't directed to you but the other, clueless, ones. Now that you've been baptized by "flame" I'd like to extend my welcome to another dealer/salesman to the list. As other's have already said, I'd like to see more dealer (and LRNA ?!) participation in the e-mail alias. Granted there's alot of "noise" at times (which gives the list it's personality) I think there's a lot to be gained in terms of knowing the customer by keeping an ear to the e-mail. What retailer wouldn't give big $$$ to know what's on thier market's mind in real-time, when here you can have it for free! At the same time, the occasional "plug" or "news brief" isn't bad, IMHO (In My Humble Opinion), I don't want this to turn into an on-line want-ads. Lastly, don't take this stuff too personally. We're all just here to have a good time, in (or under) our Rovers, of course! :-) <-- Smiley face, turned sideways. _____ /|__|_\__(| Bob Watson | | | \ a-robw@microsoft.com |---|___|___\____ Mountlake Terrace, WA, USA | _|= |= |o_ }\ [|_/_ \__|___|/_\_}| '95 Beluga Black Discovery \_/ \_/ N7UMU ------------------------------[ <- Message 16 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951227 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Tue, 26 Dec 1995 18:30:35 -0500 (EST) From: "Francis J. Twarog" <ftwarog@moose.uvm.edu> Subject: Nice to be back Well, I've been away from my computer for a few weeks, so I just caught up on the "talk-around-town". Regarding the 90 SW - truly a beautiful vehicle with a lot more attention to fit and finish. I think it is a bit more comfortable (at least in the cold) because of the cloth seats and probably nicer to drive on the highway, but definitely has one drawback (aside from the obvious lack of use a convertible) - you can't hose it out! Just this morning I put three bales of hay in the back of my dad's and discovered how nice it is (and easy) to alleviate the "barn" smell with a bucket of water and a broom (I can't imagine how expensive our "detailing" bills would be down at the Scrub-a-Dub with that truck!). Anyway, as I've said before if any readers are feeling the need to express their philanthropic side, I'd take mine in Arles blue. On the topic of the roof rack for US Defender 90s, I propose a plan - every Defender owner that is leaning toward purchasing one (if you haven't seen the picture yet, it is just like the 110's in appearance but is structurally designed to deliver the weight down through 6 connecting points - 4 on the roll cage above the driver/passenger door, one which runs down to the frame on the passenger rear (almost looks like it would attach to the top-right bracket of the swinging tire carrier) and the last connecting point is the rear ladder itself which is naturally on the driver's side) - anyway, I suggest that a group discount might be applied if several owners wanted to buy them all at once (I'm sure that they'll be above a grand) through a dealership. (MetroWest LR in MA gives a pretty generous discount to Bay State club members)... anyway, it looks really nice and will fit any US spec 90. The first casualties in the Bosnian peace-keeping mission were reported on NPR the other day - two British soldiers received minor injuries after their Land Rover travelled over a land mine. Ouch. I think the last trivia posting that I did had to do with the 107" in regards to its chassis color - the early models had their frames painted blue. Today's trivia is not for those of you who have trouble remembering dates, but logical guesses are of course, welcome... What years were the Tickford Series I station wagons produced? What was the first year that the Range Rover came available with an automatic? A five speed? Frank Twarog Burlington, Vt ------------------------------[ <- Message 17 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951227 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: 26 Dec 95 19:38:17 EST From: "William L. Leacock" <75473.3572@compuserve.com> Subject: Copy of: Half shafts ---------- Forwarded Message ---------- From: William L. Leacock, 75473,3572 TO: lro, Internet:owner-lro@uk.stratus.com DATE: 12/19/95 9:51 PM RE: Copy of: Half shafts The cone shaped failure on a genuine parts half shaft is the shape of a classic fatigue failure Regardless of how you drive you will break one eventually,normal accel and decell stresses the shaft and when the magic number is reached then snap. The half shaft dia was decided in the forties for a car with a small engine and low weight. the ser 2 and later vehicles are just too powerful and heavy for the shaft dia to carry the load. Eventually they fitted the salisbury. There are some half shafts available with 24 splines at the diff end available from the likes of Ian Ashcroft, this necessitates changing the planet gears in the diff. the smaler splines have a larger pitch dia than the ten spline standard which changes the torque capacity of the shaft. Regards Bill Leacock Limey in exile. ------------------------------[ <- Message 18 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951227 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: JEPurnell@aol.com Date: Tue, 26 Dec 1995 20:29:19 -0500 Subject: Re: Disco pricing redux and yuppies... >I asked my source inside LRNA why a stripped Disco isn't offered...one with >crank up windows, manual everything, no anti-lock brakes, etc. The reply [ truncated by lro-digester (was 7 lines)] >*perfect* for this market. Vinyl seats, hose-out interior, manual >everything. I tend to agree with the luxury concept here. I recently tried sell a Mercedes 300D for a friend in Southern California. The MBZ was a strippo, no A/C, no power nuthin'...and that was the reponse I got from advertising it...nuthin'. Noone wanted a Benzo without at least A/C. Granted the used sport ute market might be different from used luxo market, but it seems to me that people still will choose the more optioned-out car in the used market where the differences in price get smaller and smaller. This brings out another point regarding the "yuppie" thang. If Rovers where only sold to "enthusiasts" then none of us would be driving 'em. Just as in the super car craze in the '60s, many enthusiasts were the recipient of a "subsidizing" effect of these wonderful machines. "Subsidized" by the many buyers who had only the money, and nothing else, to buy the vehicles. No real understanding of proper gearing, high compression, or high lift/longer duration cams, complained about hard starting in cold weather (muscle cars), or 11 inches of suspension travel, ladder frames, and locking center diffs (off road vehicles). Sometimes it is hard for me to accept this, being an enthusiast. I want everyone who owns one to be committed to learning. Somehow I think the more people that become interested, the more these vehicles will be around. I understand the operational consequences of living with a unique specialized vehicle. The mechanics, I'm able to repair what breaks, I enjoy talking about modifications with other owners, and I am interested in the heritage of these vehicles--heck, that's why I read this list. But, on the other hand, I am a "subsidizer" too. I didn't know anything about Land Rovers before I bought this D90. I had an old bronco, but never took it off road, I just loved the body style, and being able to repair and modify the thing myself, (I have always been a hot rodder). I definately was not an off-roader at all. I still might not be...don't really have plans to regularily go to outtings etc... though I have scratched up both sides of this $30,000 truck driving off road, will continue do so if the oppourtunity arises, and I drive it through all the snow I can find. And, regarding the numbers, I really have no business spending this much on a vehicle considering my income. The only way I can rationalize it is because I AM an enthusiast. To me, so far, it is worth the sacrifices to drive one of these. I am grateful for all those who who buy LR Products (even if they don't wave), so that they are as within reach as they are to people of my means. John. 1994 D90 softop in Wisconsin ------------------------------[ <- Message 19 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951227 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Tue, 26 Dec 1995 22:43:57 -0400 From: bcw6@cornell.edu (Braman Wing) Subject: Tires for sale! (also need tire advice) Hello, hope everyone had a good christmas. I certainly did - I got 4 new 16" rims for my IIA. I was wondering if anyone could reccommend a good tire to mount - I tend to drive in heavy snow a lot, but I need something that I can still drive on the highway without too much trouble. Also, as a consequence, I have 4 15" X 10" white 8-spokes with nearly new Goodyear Tracker tires that I no longer need, so if somebody wants to make an offer... Thanks, and happy new year! Braman ------------------------------[ <- Message 20 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951227 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Tue, 26 Dec 1995 20:21:32 -0500 From: landrvr@blacdisc.com (Mike Loiodice) Subject: Re: LRNA's disdain Tom Rowe sez.... >Interesting, the thread on showroom disdain for Series vehicles. Gee, >wonder what would happen if I parked my topless camo lightweight in >front of a dealer's showroom? I'm tempted ;-) - Go ahead and do it! I drive right by the local Land Rover dealership every day and stop from time to time to drool over the new toys. I park my '65 (complete with dents and faded paint) right in front of the showroom, right by the sign that says "NO PARKING". I figure that if anyone says anything I'll just tell them to show mine to the customers so they can see how much the breed has "improved" in 30 years.. :) Cheers Mike ------------------------------[ <- Message 21 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951227 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: jpappa01@interserv.com Date: Tue, 26 Dec 1995 20:37:27 -0800 Subject: Re: Errata The engine choices for all new Land Rover NAS vehicles for the 1996 MY are as follows: Defender 90 (1995 MY): 3.9L V8 182 HP Range Rover Classic: 3.9L V8 182 HP Range Rover 4.0SE: 4.0L V8 190 HP Range Rover 4.6 HSE: 4.6L V8 225 HP Discovery: 4.0L V8 182 HP (torque bumped up one #/ft to 233 but develops at 100 rpm lower than last year's 3.9L. The 4.0/4.6 V8 are OBD2 engines and is the principal reason that there is no D90 for 1996. Cheerz Jim - The desert tan Hummer in my town now has a picture of a guy with a screw going through him!! `67 2A 88 5.0L hybrid `67 2A 109 5.0L hybrid `68 2B 110 F/C diesel `70 P6B 3500S `90 Range Rover County `93 D110 (#457/500) `95 D90 #1958 ------------------------------[ <- Message 22 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951227 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
END OF LAND ROVER OWNER DIGEST Input: messages 20 lines 1004 [forwarded 52 whitespace 222] Output: lines 867 [content 509 forwarded 49 (cut 3) whitespace 222]Forward
Photos & text Copyright 1990-2011 Bill Caloccia, All rights reserved.
Digest Messages Copyright 1990-2011 by the original poster or/and Bill Caloccia, All rights reserved.