[ First Message Last | Table of Contents | <- Digest -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
msg | Sender | lines | Subject |
1 | Lloyd Allison [lloyd@cs. | 21 | bull bars |
2 | "Stefan R. Jacob" [10004 | 11 | Magazine spam |
3 | rthomas@postoffice.ptd.n | 39 | Re: Ice.... |
4 | Alan Richer/CAM/Lotus [A | 17 | Re:Why keep the thermostat? |
5 | Sune Cullberg [sunecoll@ | 20 | Re: Chains etc |
6 | Wdcockey@aol.com | 11 | KEEP THE THERMOSTAT |
7 | Admit1Fest@aol.com | 21 | 1996 Discovery verses Used Range Rover |
8 | "christian (c.j.) szpilf | 75 | Re: Discovery decision |
9 | paul@frcs.alt.za (Paul N | 25 | Re: greasing leaf springs |
10 | "Walter C. Swain" [wcswa | 31 | Re: ===>> FREE 1 yr. Magazine Sub se |
11 | ASFCO@aol.com | 20 | Spray Paint |
12 | TONY YATES [tonyy@waalp | 8 | thermostat |
13 | rover@pinn.net (Alexande | 17 | Strange lights... |
14 | dwebb@waite.adelaide.edu | 25 | Re: Ice... In Pt Hedland ??? |
15 | ac443@osfn.rhilinet.gov | 15 | re: SPOTs to come |
16 | rthomas@postoffice.ptd.n | 18 | Re: Ice...thermostat |
17 | j-schonberg@nwu.edu (Jef | 18 | Brakes Squealing on New Range Rover |
18 | cs@crl.com (Michael Carr | 21 | Elec. Fans (Was: Ice...thermostat) |
19 | William Caloccia [calocc | 19 | [not specified] |
20 | rover@pinn.net (Alexande | 31 | Inertia belts |
21 | rover@pinn.net (Alexande | 16 | The Major is having fits... |
22 | KKelly6788@aol.com | 21 | Range Rover Squeaking Spedometer |
23 | LANDROVER@delphi.com | 21 | Re: Strange lights... |
Date: Sun, 19 Nov 1995 21:52:14 +1100 (EST) From: Lloyd Allison <lloyd@cs.monash.edu.au> Subject: bull bars here in Oz, ADR 69 (frontal impact survivability etc) requires that bull bars either be certified by the vehicle manufacturer or be crash tested to certify that they do not 1. affect survivability or 2. trigger the air-bag incorrectly (if fitted) see http://www.sofcom.com.au/4WD/Conv/ADR.html ADR 69 applies to new models from mid 1995 and all new cars from Jan 96. I have not heard of anyone actually doing crash testing yet. I have talked to a gent who has done computer simulations of bull-bars striking 'roos for the bar makers. I've also seen a plastic bull-bar on the front of a Rangie HSE and seem to recall that it's approved or certified (?) by L-R. It was quite strong enough for parking-by-feel. Lloyd ------------------------------[ <- Message 2 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951120 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: 19 Nov 95 07:51:31 EST From: "Stefan R. Jacob" <100043.2400@compuserve.com> Subject: Magazine spam > FREE 1 yr. Magazine Sub sent worldwide- ... ...etc...bla bla... ad naus. Is that some kind of chain letter - snowball spam? Remember seeing it before from a totally different source. Maybe Majordomo could do with a routine to filter out such crap. ------------------------------[ <- Message 3 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951120 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Sun, 19 Nov 1995 08:37:30 -0500 From: rthomas@postoffice.ptd.net (Randall B. Thomas) Subject: Re: Ice.... Tony wrote: >(Average max temp here >36C for next 4.5 months) >Seriously though, is there any reason NOT to remove the thermostat from [ truncated by lro-digester (was 7 lines)] >Tony. >85 110V8 The biggest problem you would have with removing the thermostat is condensation. The amount of moisture that builds up in your engine depends alot on your driving habits, i.e. if you're taking many short trips it will make it worse. The engine won't have a chance to heat up long enough to evaporate and burn the moist air that collects inside the engine every time you let it cool down. So you'll end up collecting water in your engine. This results in heavy sludge buildup over a very short time, thus constricting oil passages and also quickly clogging the engine vents which then leads to a pressurized crankcase, blown oil seals, then oil leaks and a messy engine and driveway. If you are using the Rover for long over the road or off road trips you could probably get away with it. The Rover V8 is already notorious for sludge, although it has much improved with the advent of EFI. If your V8 is fuel injected, this could cause some problems since it adjusts mixture based on engine water temp. You could see your mpg/kpg go south. If you're having problems with heating, look elsewhere first. I was stuck 2 years ago in a 100 deg (fahrenheit) traffic jam in Washington DC with 5 people in the Range Rover, the AC at full, for 2-1/2 hours and the temp guage never went past midpoint, and my 88RR isn't equipped with an oil cooler. The cooling systems are plenty sufficient. Cheers Randall Thomas Lancaster County, Pennsylvania USA 88RR 67 IIA 88" 70 P6B ------------------------------[ <- Message 4 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951120 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Alan Richer/CAM/Lotus <Alan_Richer/CAM/Lotus.LOTUS@crd.lotus.com> Date: 19 Nov 95 9:21:56 EST Subject: Re:Why keep the thermostat? Actually, having it in there keeps your engine at the optimum temperature for operation. Without it, you'll be driving around on a perpetually "cold" engine, and your performance and fuel mileage will suffer as a result. I've actually had to do that more than once (not with my LR, though) and driveability suffered badly because the engine couldn't retain enough heat for proper combustion chamber temperatures (or so it seemed). Leave it in - your engine will thank you. aj"I am NOT a madman!"r ------------------------------[ <- Message 5 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951120 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Sun, 19 Nov 1995 15:32:06 +0100 From: Sune Cullberg <sunecoll@algonet.se> Subject: Re: Chains etc Yes, the winter is here in Sweden now (at least this wekend) with 30-100 cm of snow and wind in excess of 30m/s (friday).Put my snow tires on my 85 Range Rover and time to play. Great fun! My newly tested opinion on chains is, if you (as I) only have one pair put them in front.Lock centre diff, or else you have no help from your chains as the other axle spin and possible ruin the centre diff. Of course I never drive this setup on dry road for a lot of reasons. My only problem this far is my new SU carbs tends to freeze more easily then the old strombergs.Of course I have checked the hot air system to the aircleaner but with engine covered in snow... *Sune Cullberg *Gothenburg,Sweden sunecoll@algonet.se http://www.algonet.se/~sunecoll ------------------------------[ <- Message 6 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951120 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Wdcockey@aol.com Date: Sun, 19 Nov 1995 11:05:53 -0500 Subject: KEEP THE THERMOSTAT The cooling system is designed with the thermostat as an integral part of the system. It is required for proper coolant flow pressure and distribution in the block and head. Taking it out can cause local internal overheating and potentially temperature gradients large enough to crack the head. KEEP IT. ------------------------------[ <- Message 7 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951120 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Admit1Fest@aol.com Date: Sun, 19 Nov 1995 11:24:44 -0500 Subject: 1996 Discovery verses Used Range Rover I am curious as to the opinion of the LRO list subscribers regarding the purchase of a new Discovery verses a used late model Range Rover. Perhaps those better informed could communicate which vehicle is the better choice for a driver who will, like many of the owners of newer Land Rovers, rarely use the vehicle for off road transportation. In addition, are there Range Rover model years that are better avoided due to reliability concerns? Your comments on the aforementioned will certainly be appreciated. Sincerely, Mark Novey Admit1Fest@aol.com ------------------------------[ <- Message 8 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951120 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Sun, 19 Nov 1995 11:21:00 -0500 From: "christian (c.j.) szpilfogel" <chrisz@bnr.ca> Subject: Re: Discovery decision In message " Dealer-installed Sunroof and negotiations", Admit1Fest@aol.com writes: >I was reviewing your recent posting on the LRO list and noticed that you are >a Discovery owner. I am contemplating the purchase of a 1996 Discovery and >would appreciate an owner's point of view. Would you care to share your >experiences with this vehicle? I would really appreciate your assistance. >Sincerely, >Mark Novey >would appreciate an owner's point of view. Would you care to share your >experiences with this vehicle? I would really appreciate your assistance. Hi Mark, In a phrase, I love it. I do a bit of off-roading and I've had two CJ-7s in the past. To me the vehicle is good value for money when you consider the following: +) It is structurally much stronger than most of the other vehicles (possibly excluding the big Chevies) +) The aluminum body and heavy steel frame means it won't rust out in 10 years like everything else in this area +) It is the most capable off-roader I have driven stock in its class (I did not try the Mercedes or Hummers on purpose and the Defender was not ideal for the family). +) It has a good tall cargo area even if it is a bit short. I really like the overall general feel of the vehicle when driving and my passengers like the higher bench seat in the back. The other vehicles in its class are decent vehicles except for the Ford Explorer. If you like Ford's then the Bronco is probably a better choice. On the negative side, some of the interior manufacturing was a bit sloppy - Cruise control was non-functional (loose wire) - There was a small rip in the seat ( the cloth seats seem a little flimsy) - Turn indicators (left side) failed intermitantly Although I find these things unacceptable it is unfortunately very common on all brands and models of vehicles I have ever seen. Being in the engineering field I understand that the manufacturers have to balance the quality vs. cost equation. What was important to me was that the engineering of the Discovery looks solid. I bought an off-roader because I like to do off-roading and I tend to take long trips (>1000km) during the winter months in Canada. If you don't do either then buying an off-roader is over kill and there are much more sensible options. On the other hand, if you have the money there is nothing wrong with being influenced by your emotions. When you're spending this kind of money, the vehicle better bring a smile to your face. I am happy to say that my Discovery gives me a big grin every time I drive it. I also wanted to mention that my dealer has been excellent! This includes the sales and service reps. When I brought it in for warranty work they gave me a loaner and cleaned my car all with a smile and absolutely no hastle. If you saw how dirty the Rover was going into the shop you'ld know this was not trivial. The mechanic (Jason) is a SIII owner and I believe with OVLR which gives me a great deal of confidence. Good luck with your decision. Cheers, -Christian -------------- Christian Szpilfogel '95 Discovery Ottawa, Ontario, Canada ------------------------------[ <- Message 9 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951120 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: paul@frcs.alt.za (Paul Nash) Subject: Re: greasing leaf springs Date: Sun, 19 Nov 1995 10:51:04 +1100 My father had a number of WO Bentley cars (in the days before vintage cars were fashionable), and had a spring-greasing tool. It looked like a thing cold-chisel, with a hole drilled 3/4 the way down the length, starting at the sharp end, and a grease nipple inserted 1/2 way down the length, from the side. You loostened the leaf clamps (but left shackles & U-bolts alone), then put the sharp end between two leaves & basked the back. One it was wedged in between the leaves, you applied a grease-gun to the nipple and injected grease into the centre of the spring. The manuals used to recommend greasing springs at 1000 or 5000 mile intervals (it was a long time ago), as this helps to keep the springs flexible, stops rust and flushes out road dirt. Roads in the '20s were mostly unsealed, and there are a lot of similarities between 6 1/2 Bentleys and series Land Rovers, but they _were_ designed for slightly different use :-) paul ------------------------------[ <- Message 10 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951120 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Sun, 19 Nov 1995 10:15:32 -0800 (PST) From: "Walter C. Swain" <wcswain@wheel.dcn.davis.ca.us> Subject: Re: ===>> FREE 1 yr. Magazine Sub se LROs All, I suggest that we ALL forward copies of the LRO Digest to this freeloading parasite (krazykev@kjl.com) until he throws in the towel and takes steps to insure that there will be no more of these bogus messages. Think of the jamb that 2 or 3 hundred copies of the digest would create in his inbox. The subject ought to be changed, of course, to something to do with subscriptions to force each one to be opened. Better yet, forward all manner of stuff to this clown. The bigger the better. I too would like to know if there is a way to filter out such crap, but until that happens, we need to make it as unpleasant as possible for those who stand to gain from Internet junk mail. I have an uncomfortable feeling that if this kind of thing goes unchallenged we will see much more of it in the future. On Sat, 18 Nov 1995, David Rosenbaum wrote: > I too "replied" to the first message from Japan (keep your &%$@ junk > mail off of the Land Rover Owner Digest!), and message got returned. > Then, I sent back the included form and got a reply from the > Krazy Kevin Mag Club by "Kevin Jay Lipsitz, President" <krazykev@kjl.com> > You might send your opinion to <krazykev@kjl.com>. Even better, if we get > more of that junk mail, there's now an address to forward it to. ------------------------------[ <- Message 11 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951120 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: ASFCO@aol.com Date: Sun, 19 Nov 1995 15:40:52 -0500 Subject: Spray Paint All............. Have found a good source for Land-Rover paints in 16 oz. spray cans. Call Tower Paint at 1-800-779-6520 . They will custom mix and ship within 2-3 days from receipt of your order, just provide them with the paint code of the colors you need. prices are reasonable and as they have no minimum order, they will even make a single can . just in case you need these code #s LIMESTONE 38505a PASTEL GREEN 38504a Regards to all Steve WA2GMC 72 slll 88 ------------------------------[ <- Message 12 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951120 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 1995 05:11:28 +0800 (WST) From: TONY YATES <tonyy@waalpha.wa.BoM.GOV.AU> Subject: thermostat That noise in the background is me dropping the spanner ... Good response guys. Ta. ------------------------------[ <- Message 13 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951120 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Sun, 19 Nov 1995 18:33:51 -0500 From: rover@pinn.net (Alexander P. Grice) Subject: Strange lights... Came across a "new" Land Rover today...some folks nearby have just purchased a IIa 109 safari (didn't get much other info). This Rover has the front turn signals in these little pods on top of the wings. I've seen this before...usually on vehicles fitted with front jerry cans. As all seem to be similar, is this a factory mod or what? And if so...what years? *----"Jeep may be famous, LAND-ROVER is Legendary"----* | A. P. (Sandy) Grice | | Rover Owners' Association of Virginia | | 1633 Melrose Parkway, Norfolk, VA 23508-1730 | | E-mail: rover@pinn.net Phone: 804-622-7054 (Day) | | 804-423-4898 (Evenings) FAX: 804-622-7056 | *-----------------------------------------------------* ------------------------------[ <- Message 14 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951120 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: dwebb@waite.adelaide.edu.au (Daryl Webb) Subject: Re: Ice... In Pt Hedland ??? Date: Mon, 20 Nov 1995 10:27:14 +1030 (CST) > Seriously though, is there any reason NOT to remove the thermostat from > my motor. I figure that it isn't really necessary here and I might get > better cooling without the restriction. Actually Tony you'd probably get worse cooling without the restriction, the flow rate on the open road would be so high that the dwell time in the radiator would drop dramatically. I've seen it many times on an assortment of cars in Darwin NT. People pull out the thermostat, and the car runs hotter. Dont know if the same would apply to the rover V8 but... If you want a bit more "head room" drop to a 160 F thermo from the 180. Dont really know if there are negative side effects to running the lower temp thermostat, but It makes you feel good when even on the hottest day the temp guage doesnt climb much above half way..... Just my idle thoughts -- Daryl Webb (dwebb@waite.adelaide.edu.au) ------------------------------[ <- Message 15 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951120 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Sun, 19 Nov 1995 19:17:25 -0500 From: ac443@osfn.rhilinet.gov (John Karlsson) Subject: re: SPOTs to come Paul Nash: When I was faced with leaking swivels and lack of energy to perform a proper repair, I perpetrated a SPOT of my own. I took a pair of new swivel seals and cut the seals so I could fit them without performing major surgery on the front axle. Of course, the cut was at the top after fitting. Puting the cut at the bottom would be the real SPOT. John Karlsson Hope Valley, RI USA ------------------------------[ <- Message 16 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951120 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Sun, 19 Nov 1995 20:18:41 -0500 From: rthomas@postoffice.ptd.net (Randall B. Thomas) Subject: Re: Ice...thermostat >> Seriously though, is there any reason NOT to remove the thermostat from >> my motor. [ truncated by lro-digester (was 6 lines)] >thermostat, but It makes you feel good when even on the hottest day the temp >guage doesnt climb much above half way..... I used to put the coldest thermostat I could find in my MGB in the summer. All it would do would buy me an extra 10 minutes until the engine overheated if I got stuck in traffic on a hot day. Watching that needle rise was like watching the sand fall through an hourglass. A futile exercise in forestalling the inevitable. Randall ------------------------------[ <- Message 17 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951120 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Sun, 19 Nov 1995 19:44:41 -0600 From: j-schonberg@nwu.edu (Jeffrey Schonberg) Subject: Brakes Squealing on New Range Rover Hello, Has there been any discussion concerning disk brakes squealing on new Range Rovers (1995 County Classic)? After the first week (and 500 fun miles!) of driving my new truck I was told by Rover service department that the squealing I experienced was "normal" due to the glazing on the new pads. This sounds fishy to me. They recommended that I drive it for another week before re-evaluating. Any help (including a better explanation) would be much appreciated. Thanks in advance, Jeff ------------------------------[ <- Message 18 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951120 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Sun, 19 Nov 1995 18:34:42 +0000 From: cs@crl.com (Michael Carradine) Subject: Elec. Fans (Was: Ice...thermostat) Randall B. Thomas <rthomas@postoffice.ptd.net> writes: :I used to put the coldest thermostat I could find in my MGB in the summer. :All it would do would buy me an extra 10 minutes until the engine overheated :if I got stuck in traffic on a hot day. Watching that needle rise was like :watching the sand fall through an hourglass. No doubt a candidate for an electric fan, either as a primary or secondary unit. Has anyone installed an electric fan for their Series Rover, Lucas permitting? :) ______ Michael Carradine [__[__\== Rumpole of the Bay 510-988-0900 [________] Land-Rover 4x4 cs@crl.com ___________.._(o)__.(o)_____...o^^^+++++ '65 IIA 2.235m/88" _________________________________________________________________________ Land-Rover 4x4 Connection WWW page at: http://www.crl.com/~cs/rover.html ------------------------------[ <- Message 19 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951120 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Subject: URLs for LRO list: http://www.senie.com/billc/lr/ Date: Sun, 19 Nov 1995 21:41:19 -0500 From: William Caloccia <caloccia@OpenMarket.com> Hi if you've got web pages and either mention the LRO list and the mailing address, or have a copy of some previous (OLD OUT OF DATE) information for the mailing list, PLEASE, PLEASE replace these references with a POINTer to the pages at http://www.senie.com/billc/lr/ The old majordomo text page is near useless and has an old address. VERY VERY soon, all that old address WILL break. If you _really_ want to keep a local copy for some reason, please don't without contacting me first. Thanks, -B ------------------------------[ <- Message 20 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951120 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Sun, 19 Nov 1995 22:05:32 -0500 From: rover@pinn.net (Alexander P. Grice) Subject: Inertia belts I've fitted the inertia belts into a Series...it's easy -if you keep a few things in mind. The lower fixing point at the bottom corner of the door and seatbox can be reused, as can the fixing for the buckle-end mounts inboard (between the seats). I mounted the reel itself on the top of the bulkhead using grade eight bolts. The only problem is the upper mounting point. Rovers North (and other suppliers, I imagine) sells a triangular bracket that bolts between the door and window frame (on an 88). I removed the facsia panel and lo and behold, there was a captive nut *already* in place - *and* it was some weird metric thread that the hardware manufactured 20 years later fit. Now mine is one of the first thousand Series III's built; it has one metric bolt (deep in the tranny), yet here was a metric nut ready for the seat belt. So, If you have a series III, fitting the inertia reels is quick and easy. The only problem is when ordering just one "side" at a time. Because of the expense and uncertainty of application, I ordered just the "drivers" side from RN, but of course, got the one that fit the right side of the vehicle....Cheers *----"Jeep may be famous, LAND-ROVER is Legendary"----* | A. P. (Sandy) Grice | | Rover Owners' Association of Virginia | | 1633 Melrose Parkway, Norfolk, VA 23508-1730 | | E-mail: rover@pinn.net Phone: 804-622-7054 (Day) | | 804-423-4898 (Evenings) FAX: 804-622-7056 | *-----------------------------------------------------* ------------------------------[ <- Message 21 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951120 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Sun, 19 Nov 1995 22:05:36 -0500 From: rover@pinn.net (Alexander P. Grice) Subject: The Major is having fits... What's up with the major??...though there were 45 messages in the header for 18 November, only the first 30 were transmitted...or at least, were received on this end. However, as the Major's closing comments appeared intact, I can only assume something is happening on the sending end. *----"Jeep may be famous, LAND-ROVER is Legendary"----* | A. P. (Sandy) Grice | | Rover Owners' Association of Virginia | | 1633 Melrose Parkway, Norfolk, VA 23508-1730 | | E-mail: rover@pinn.net Phone: 804-622-7054 (Day) | | 804-423-4898 (Evenings) FAX: 804-622-7056 | *-----------------------------------------------------* ------------------------------[ <- Message 22 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951120 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: KKelly6788@aol.com Date: Sun, 19 Nov 1995 22:30:44 -0500 Subject: Range Rover Squeaking Spedometer The squeaking noise comming from my '89 RR speedometer/speedometer cable is starting to annoy me so I am going to spend the time to get behind the instrument pannel cowl and lubricate the cable and speedometer. Any tips on what lubricant to use? I hope to use something that will last for a while. I am not sure if I should use a light oil like WD-40, a sewing machine oil, or graphite powder. While I am working on the dash to get rid of the speedometer noise I want to get rid of two other minor annoyances: The key in ignition buzzer (or as it is called in the workshop manual the audible warning unit) and the interior light delay. Can I just pull the plugs on these things? or will I cause some sort of problems? Thanks Kevin Kelly ------------------------------[ <- Message 23 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951120 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: LANDROVER@delphi.com Date: Mon, 20 Nov 1995 00:26:40 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: Strange lights... Sandy asks.. - a IIa 109 safari (didn't get much other info). This Rover has the front - turn signals in these little pods on top of the wings. I've seen this - before...usually on vehicles fitted with front jerry cans. As all seem to - be similar, is this a factory mod or what? And if so...what years? >From what I've heard, the "pods" were supplied from a company in Germany - for use with the jerry cans. Haven't a clue as to the years. Of course, this may be all bull, but who knows. If you see the truck again, check out the lights closely - see if they are Lucas or something else. May be a clue as to the origin.. maybe not. Cheers Mike ------------------------------[ <- Message 24 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951120 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
END OF LAND ROVER OWNER DIGEST Input: messages 22 lines 890 [forwarded 33 whitespace 285] Output: lines 779 [content 378 forwarded 28 (cut 5) whitespace 283]Forward
Photos & text Copyright 1990-2011 Bill Caloccia, All rights reserved.
Digest Messages Copyright 1990-2011 by the original poster or/and Bill Caloccia, All rights reserved.