[ First Message Last | Table of Contents | <- Digest -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
msg | Sender | lines | Subject |
1 | Mr Ian Stuart [Ian.Stuar | 18 | Re: Sunshiny SA (joke) |
2 | Peter Aslan [paslan@uk.m | 37 | Re: Clutch replacement for IIA (fwd) |
3 | azw@aber.ac.uk (Andy Woo | 20 | Re: Undercoating |
4 | azw@aber.ac.uk (Andy Woo | 25 | Re: truncated messages |
5 | zebra@xs4all.nl (Bastiaa | 13 | Replacement Bumbers Disco |
6 | zebra@xs4all.nl (Bastiaa | 13 | Replacement Bumbers Disco |
7 | cw117@mole.bio.cam.ac.uk | 28 | Gene Jockey |
8 | [Glen_Rees@parlon2.ccmai | 15 | Proper Land Rover Beer |
9 | Mike Rooth [M.J.Rooth@lu | 13 | Re: Gene Jockey |
10 | Brian Neill Tiedemann [s | 79 | diff locks ++ |
11 | Easton Trevor [TEASTON@D | 36 | Blue Balls, Leaks and Draughting |
12 | Sanna@aol.com | 16 | Re: Range Rover front brush bars |
13 | "Stefan R. Jacob" [10004 | 41 | Re: Diff. Locks; AC in Series |
14 | "Tom Rowe" [TROWE@AE.AGE | 25 | Re: truncated messages |
15 | Alan Richer/CAM/Lotus [A | 20 | Re: Proper Land-Rover beer.... |
16 | Spenny@aol.com | 17 | Proper Land-Rover beer.... |
17 | Alan Richer/CAM/Lotus [A | 10 | Re: truncated messages |
18 | Mr Ian Stuart [Ian.Stuar | 20 | Re: truncated messages |
19 | "Tom Rowe" [TROWE@AE.AGE | 40 | Re: 101 diffs and lockers |
20 | "Tom Rowe" [TROWE@AE.AGE | 26 | Re: Gene Jockey |
21 | Mike Rooth [M.J.Rooth@lu | 11 | Re: Gene Jockey |
22 | cw117@mole.bio.cam.ac.uk | 22 | Re: truncated messages |
23 | cw117@mole.bio.cam.ac.uk | 23 | Re: Proper Land-Rover beer.... |
24 | cw117@mole.bio.cam.ac.uk | 23 | Re: Gene Jockey |
25 | Russell Burns [burns@cis | 27 | Re: Gene Jockey |
26 | Mr Ian Stuart [Ian.Stuar | 14 | A test to see which address chops the bottom off |
27 | Mr Ian Stuart [Ian.Stuar | 14 | A test to see which address chops the bottom off |
28 | BobandSueB@aol.com | 39 | Re: #1(2) The Land Rover Owner Daily Digest RE:(clutch) |
29 | Dixon Kenner [dkenner@em | 20 | Re: Proper Land-Rover beer.... |
30 | DANCSC@aol.com | 10 | Re: #1(2) The Land Rover Owner Daily Digest |
31 | DANCSC@aol.com | 17 | Re: #1(2) Camel Trophy |
32 | cs@crl.com (Michael Carr | 30 | Re: Replacement Bumbers Disco |
33 | jhoward@argus.lowell.edu | 13 | Re: Aerodynamically speaking.... |
34 | jhoward@argus.lowell.edu | 21 | Re: Anybody ever A/C a Series IIa? |
35 | Alan Richer/CAM/Lotus [A | 265 | Tutorial: On the repair of wiper motors |
36 | Alan Richer/CAM/Lotus [A | 12 | Re: Wiper motor article: |
37 | ROB@HARV-EHS.mhs.harvard | 10 | AC for IIa |
38 | Dixon Kenner [dkenner@em | 25 | Re: Wiper motor article: |
39 | LRDEFNDR3@aol.com | 36 | re: loose exhaust bolts |
40 | cw117@mole.bio.cam.ac.uk | 17 | Re: AC for IIa |
41 | Dixon Kenner [dkenner@em | 35 | Re: Beaches making us soft!!! |
42 | DANCSC@aol.com | 17 | was it Tom Rowe asking about camel trophy? |
43 | Bill Yerazunis [crash@co | 17 | Re: Disco Exhaust Bolts |
44 | tonyb@ejv.com (Tony Brom | 13 | Range Rover rusty tailgate repair |
45 | Biosource [0003479098@mc | 23 | RR console heat problem. |
46 | Paul Sturm [psturm@ilhaw | 16 | [not specified] |
47 | terje@tvnorge.no (Terje | 34 | NLRK 20th anniversary rally |
48 | ecoethic@rcinet.com | 37 | Valve guide seal replacement |
49 | David John Place [umplac | 25 | Re: Valve guide seal replacement |
50 | Russell Burns [burns@cis | 23 | Re: RR console heat problem. |
51 | LANDROVER@delphi.com | 19 | Re: Proper Land-Rover beer.... |
52 | LANDROVER@delphi.com | 19 | Re: Gene Jockey |
From: Mr Ian Stuart <Ian.Stuart@ed.ac.uk> Date: Fri, 14 Jul 1995 08:44:09 +0000 Subject: Re: Sunshiny SA (joke) On 13 Jul 95, Michael Carradine wrote: > to complete their chromosome chain? There's a hint in the title: "gene JOCKEY". Jockey's ride, so obviously a "gene jockey" is someone who's paid to ride genes :-) ----** Ian Stuart (Computing Officer) +44 31 650 6205 Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, Edinburgh University. <http://www.vet.ed.ac.uk/> or <http://www.tardis.ed.ac.uk/~kiz/> ------------------------------[ <- Message 2 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950715 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 1995 09:34:22 +0100 (BST) From: Peter Aslan <paslan@uk.mdis.com> Subject: Re: Clutch replacement for IIA (fwd) thought I'd chip in here.. I just purchased a new clutch 'cover' from Craddocks (sp). This is 9 inch I guess,, 9 seperate springs, presure plate cover, the whole thing. Cost about 27 quid, a plesent supprise. I was also concerned that I'd end up with a 'bag-o-bits' and the details in the manual for setting it up were a bit frightning. Comparing the pressure it takes to depress the three fingers shows, that it is possible on the old assembily, a bit too easy really. The new one however is realy tight, I'm unable to move it, the guy in the shop said it was probably original, comes from a 1960 S2. It feels good to find the cause of a problem, theres nothing more frustrating than tearing somthing down, finding nothing, putting it back together only to find the same fault. Now, the friction plate was out of stock, but the old one is still serviceable. They said these plates were becoming more and more difficult to find, they charge a big surcharge unless the old one is handed in, so they can re-condition it I guess. Regards, Peter Aslan (aka Captain Norton). Louden Quill Award. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- McDonnell Information Systems Boundary Way Hemel Hempstead Voice: 01442 273324 Hertfordshire HP2 7HU Fax: 01442 244896 ENGLAND Mail: paslan@uk.mdis.com --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------[ <- Message 3 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950715 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: azw@aber.ac.uk (Andy Woodward) Subject: Re: Undercoating Date: Fri, 14 Jul 1995 10:14:22 UNDEFINED \In response to the "waxoil" info, Rovers North (Autumn,'94) Newsletter \recommends renewing the undercoating on the D90 chassis annually. What do \you use as "undercoating" and how is it applied? Given the awful \reputation of the "rustproofing" franchaises that flourished in the US in \the '70's, is there any good commericial "undercoating" company or is it \better to do it yourself? Also, what is "POR-15". I inject the inside of the chassis tubes once every 5 years and spray the whole outside of it every autumn. It is 11 years old and the cchassis is as new. Most of teh others of that age are a MESS. +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Just another roadkill on the Information Superhighway +++++++++++++++++++++++ None-%er #1 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ------------------------------[ <- Message 4 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950715 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: azw@aber.ac.uk (Andy Woodward) Subject: Re: truncated messages Date: Fri, 14 Jul 1995 10:23:15 UNDEFINED > Dixon Kenner's message about winches got truncated at > >"...a mountain of......" > is anyone else having this problem? ie.Is it the Major or my reader? What (still) pisses me off is the way that MajorDomo chooses to 'save' bandwidth by deleting long inclusions. So you regularly get a really interesting looking reply to something with only the first line, or so. Then [truncated gratuitously] message,. Then the last line. So all this useful info comes to nowt cos you cant tell what the hell its about. Any chance of dropping this 'useful' design feature??? I. for one would rather have the fulll inclusions and a little more bandwidth. This list doesnt have noise problems, so the occasional waste of bandwidth would be more than cocmensated by having the full information. +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Just another roadkill on the Information Superhighway +++++++++++++++++++++++ None-%er #1 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ------------------------------[ <- Message 5 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950715 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 1995 11:50:02 +0200 From: zebra@xs4all.nl (Bastiaan Houtkooper) Subject: Replacement Bumbers Disco I am looking for replacement bumbers for the "plastic"ones on my '95 Disco 300 TDI. The front seems no problem because there are a lot of replacement (winch) bumbers available, but did anybody see anything good for the back. I would like to have a "real"strong Rover again! ( I am also interested in drawings of home made designs) Bastiaan Houtkooper ------------------------------[ <- Message 6 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950715 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 1995 11:50:05 +0200 From: zebra@xs4all.nl (Bastiaan Houtkooper) Subject: Replacement Bumbers Disco I am looking for replacement bumbers for the "plastic"ones on my '95 Disco 300 TDI. The front seems no problem because there are a lot of replacement (winch) bumbers available, but did anybody see anything good for the back. I would like to have a "real"strong Rover again! ( I am also interested in drawings of home made designs) Bastiaan Houtkooper ------------------------------[ <- Message 7 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950715 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 1995 11:43:38 +0100 From: cw117@mole.bio.cam.ac.uk (Charlie Wright) Subject: Gene Jockey At 9:44am 14/7/95, Mr Ian Stuart wrote: >To change subscription write to: Majordomo@Land-Rover.Team.Net >On 13 Jul 95, Michael Carradine wrote: [ truncated by lro-digester (was 9 lines)] >There's a hint in the title: "gene JOCKEY". Jockey's ride, so obviously a >"gene jockey" is someone who's paid to ride genes No, no, no... It's more like a disc-jockey. We're responsible for changing your genes smoothly and efficiently and with such skill you'll never know you're evolving until one day you'll wake up and realise that you've been washing your Series machine, changing your underwear out of habit instead of need, eating vegetables with your beer, and understanding things like Lucus electrics... But don't thank me, it's only my job... ;-) Charlie C. R. Wright Dept. of Genetics +44 (0)1223 333970 telephone Univ. of Cambridge +44 (0)1223 333992 telefax Downing Street, Cambs. cw117@mole.bio.cam.ac.uk CB2 3EH, England ------------------------------[ <- Message 8 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950715 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: 14 Jul 95 07:31:52 EDT From: <Glen_Rees@parlon2.ccmail.compuserve.com> Subject: Proper Land Rover Beer Picking up on Alan Richer's thread about homebrewing. Have you tied "The Firkin Brewery's" Dogbolter yet? This is some serious stuff, (falling down water) it's a dark porter with SG=4.8+ (1048-50) Brewed in 25/30 pint batches (or more if you have the facilities) Glenn (pissed of Woodham) ------------------------------[ <- Message 9 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950715 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Mike Rooth <M.J.Rooth@lut.ac.uk> Subject: Re: Gene Jockey Date: Fri, 14 Jul 95 12:36:41 BST Humph,more likely washing our underwear *in* the Series Machine, drinking pints of vegetables and trying to eat beer with a knife! Anyway,I thought Gene was a cowboy:-) Cheers Mike Rooth ------------------------------[ <- Message 10 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950715 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Brian Neill Tiedemann <s914440@minyos.xx.rmit.EDU.AU> Subject: diff locks ++ Date: Fri, 14 Jul 1995 21:56:02 +1000 (EST) In reply to Gowyn and Daryl (and all who think about going to the beach when the MAX temperature during the day is 7 degrees C _shivvvvver_). Now on the diff locks, most series LRs have the ability to select 2 or 4 wheel drive, and when in 4WD, the drive to the front and rear comes off a common point in the transfer gearbox. In a full time 4WD like a RR or Disco or many others, there must be some "give" between front and rear drive shafts - think about the different distances travelled by each individual wheel, NOT the same, so if driving front and rear all the time, on a grippy surface (bitumen) then a diff between front and rear driveshafts will provide for the "give" needed. When you series folk engage 4WD and lock hubs (if you have them), Mr R Over says thou shalt not be on bitumen... This is for the reason given above- the front and rear will be wanting to go different distances when turning corners, so huge forces (evil + dark) will be set up in the T case. These should not be unleashed! On non-grippy (read mud-n-stuff) surfaces, that 'centre diff' will help you get stuck sooner- only one wheel need lose grip to lose forward progress. SO - we three diffed ones are blessed with a lock system (on the centre diff only :( ) this stops the differential action when engaged- making our drive trains then equivalent to a series in 4WD- again not to be locked on bitumen. This centre diff is _much_ smaller than the front and rear ones, and does not like to spin hard, so MY opinion is that it should be locked as soon as you are on a surface where the wheels can slip enough to provide the "give" mentioned above- trivial extra tyre wear, and better control and capability result, and expensive (trust me) centre diff rebuilds are avoided. The locked diff is WAY more robust than when it is free to spin. Now, given all that, to have this type of lock system on a front and rear diffs would make a more capable, even if difficult to steer vehicle. If 1 end is locked, 3 wheels must slip to lose traction, and 2 means all four must slip before you stick- true 4 wheel drive. Detroit lockers and Lock-Rites are a form of always locked unless cornering diff setup without gears in the centre- smart people designed these, very trikky :).Diff remains locked until 1 axle trys to turn Faster than the carrier- only happens when cornering with grip. The detroit system has more inherent backlash than the lock rite, and I am told that the lock rite is more driver friendly when used in the front, but I have never driven with a front one. Both should re lock if enough power is applied to bring axles back to equal speeds. Vacuum lockers, Air Lockers, and various manual lockers are all selectable- that is they remain as a free diff until you want to activate the lock system. These are often supplied with heavier axles- (as should the above types really I suppose) because with the diff locked, it is possible that the full weight of the vehicle, and the full engine horsepower could be applied to only one wheel- strain strain *snap* :($. Limited slip diffs do just that, slip by an amount less than a free diff. This still provides some drive in a 1 wheel spin situation, and allows the cornering differential action as well. I think that a Posi-Traction falls into this category, but I'm not sure. Torsen diffs, I believe, are even smarter than detroits, behaving as a free diff, and a locked diff depending upon spin/throttle action- does anyone know where I might find a detailed description/diagram of the operating mechanism used. I am intrigued! The principal used is that of a worm gear being able to drive a spur gear, but the spur being unable to drive the worm, but the exact method that this is applied I can only imagine, as I have not seen one in bits. Lastly, on the when to lock the centre diff thread, my RR is quite capable in reverse, most of the time, as RRs are actually heavier over the rear axle than the front, so mostly (not always I admit) if I drive in and get stuck, I can reverse out, or at least rock back and forward in hope. I prefer to look after my centre diff rather than have the "traction fuse" effect of driving until it spins (then maybe welds itself together or snaps). There's always the hand winch- soon PTO (or some Canned Loser as a LAST resort- usually behind anyway. (still looking for a PTO for 4spd RR ....... anyone???) still suffering lysdexia :} and long winded posts- wanna write a diffs FAQ? Brian 77 RR (Unoffended- so far) ------------------------------[ <- Message 11 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950715 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Easton Trevor <TEASTON@DQC2.DOFASCO.CA> Subject: Blue Balls, Leaks and Draughting Date: Fri, 14 Jul 95 08:25:00 DST Pulling into the driveway last night I noticed a large pool of oil under Miss Golightly's left side swivel ball. Having just expounded the virtues of epoxy repairs to balls I was a little concerned (Was this another case of LRODS "Land Rover Owner Digest Syndrome", everything is fine until you mention it on the digest, then everyone has a problem). Closer examination after removal of the gaiters found the ball surface clean and smooth with only a small amount of oil inside the gaiter. So where did the puddle come from? As I swung the steering I suddenly noticed that the steering arm and brake drum were not moving in unison and the four bolts holding the arm were all loose. These bolts were torqued and lock tabbed when the swivels were rebuilt, I retorqued them and reset the tabs. Any opinions on how they came to be loose. The right side was checked and all were tight. Apologies in advance to all those whose steering arms will now become loose, During our trip to The Down East I was able to make the following observations regarding speeds. Miss Golightly has standard ratios, no overdrive and 205/85/16 rubber. 1000 rpm equals 16 mph (Indicated). In the mountains where it required 2nd gear for the uphill portion, it was possible to maintain 50 mph foot off in gear downhill. Hills that were just climbable in top could be coasted down at 55mph with the wind resistance just equal to the gravity. Look Ma no feet!. Going to Boston down I95 we were able (Unable to avoid) draught several large trucks. It was possible to maintain 65 mph with just a tickle of accelerator when close (< 10ft) behind a truck but the affects on engine temperature were soon apparent and the effects on personal stress level for both the driver and poor Mary as an innocent passenger were immediate. One theory I have heard put forward is to travel so close that if the truck suddenly slows you immediately become part of the trailer with only a slight impact. Trevor Easton, 1962 SIIA SWB SW Miss Golightly ------------------------------[ <- Message 12 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950715 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Sanna@aol.com Date: Fri, 14 Jul 1995 08:28:31 -0400 Subject: Re: Range Rover front brush bars >The one disadvantage is that it makes the task of changing a headlamp into a two hour ordeal. Oh yes, and I forgot to add.... Changing a tailight also turns into a two hour (almost) ordeal as well. The large plastic knob that should make loosening the shield to swing it away on its hinges easy, turns an aluminum bolt that oxidizes to its aluminum nut almost imediately, and strips. Not a good design. - ------------------------------[ <- Message 13 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950715 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: 14 Jul 95 08:28:45 EDT From: "Stefan R. Jacob" <100043.2400@compuserve.com> Subject: Re: Diff. Locks; AC in Series > ...<snip>... My understanding is that the new LR's, full time > 4wd have a selectable centre diff lock. What about us poorer folk with > series models? Are diff locks the same as posi traction? No, no... Series folks are much better off! When you engage 4WD you have fully automatic instantaneous locking of both axles! Have pitty on the others who have to start fiddling around with their little joystick whenever they need traction. The Series are much more technically advanced... ;-) ------------------------------- Re: AC, the optional AC for the Defender 110 County has the condenser thing sitting not on the bulkhead but *in front* of the radiator, with the front grille ('breakfast'?) protuding out and frontwards beyond the bumper... bit of a silly construction for an off-road vehicle IMO. However, on a Series where the radiator is set back quite a bit, this setup might be a viable solution, i.e. moving the grill more up front to make room for the condenser (the grill would in fact be a kind of rectangular basket). It would make the AC more efficient, and you wouldn't be bonnet-challenged. Inside dashboard-wise, you loose the entire shuttle vent-with-tray, instead you have a vertical insulated plastic fascia over the entire width, with 4 adjustable vents that conduct the cooled air. The compressor sits top left from the engine, like the generator, but other side. You'll need a double-grooved pulley wheel on your crankshaft to run the additional flybelt; pulley from a 24V mil. Lightweight should work fine. On an older engine that doesn't have the aux. mounts incorporated, I'd weld or bolt some sort of supporting mount directly to the frame. Using the timing gear cover or water pump bolts to mount a compressor bracket doesn't seem like a good idea to me, as the old engines don't have any plane surface where the mount would fit flush. - Incidentally I remember that, a few years back in Greece, I saw and closely inspected a red S.III 88 hardtop that had been used by Caltex in the Arabian Gulf area and was fully air conditioned. The AC unit had multilingual Warning stickers with the Land Rover logo all over it, so it must have been some sort of original LR setup. Stefan <Stefan R. Jacob, 100043.2400@CompuServe.com> ------------------------------[ <- Message 14 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950715 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Tom Rowe" <TROWE@AE.AGECON.WISC.EDU> Date: Fri, 14 Jul 1995 07:47:32 GMT -0600 Subject: Re: truncated messages Snip > What (still) pisses me off is the way that MajorDomo chooses to 'save' > bandwidth by deleting long inclusions. Snip > Any chance of dropping this 'useful' design feature??? Snip Andy, et al, Perhaps we could get that disabled if we all agree to snip out portions of inclusions that don't bear on the topic of our reply. Tom Tom Rowe UW-Madison Center for Dairy Research 608-265-6194, Fax:608-262-1578 trowe@ae.agecon.wisc.edu Four wheel drive allows you to get stuck in places even more inaccessible. ------------------------------[ <- Message 15 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950715 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Alan Richer/CAM/Lotus <Alan_Richer/CAM/Lotus.LOTUS@crd.lotus.com> Date: 14 Jul 95 9:01:15 EDT Subject: Re: Proper Land-Rover beer.... Re: pondering: What I was pondering as I consumed the dark, rich porter was the proper beer for we independent, freedom-loving, self-reliant LandRover owners...this will require extensive research - I hope! 8*) I really should formulate a recipe to honor our aluminum friends. The only problem is avoiding the oil...8*) -Alan Line Eater Fodder Line EaterFodder ------------------------------[ <- Message 16 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950715 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Spenny@aol.com Date: Fri, 14 Jul 1995 09:07:21 -0400 Subject: Proper Land-Rover beer.... Alan writes.... Speaking as a homebrewer, Another home brewer! I brewed some Land Rover Stout for the Birthday Party, but it spoiled :-( Land Rover Stout... Looks like 90wt., tastes like heaven. Spenny ------------------------------[ <- Message 17 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950715 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Alan Richer/CAM/Lotus <Alan_Richer/CAM/Lotus.LOTUS@crd.lotus.com> Date: 14 Jul 95 9:19:53 EDT Subject: Re: truncated messages > Perhaps we could get this disabled if we agree to snip >down the messages... I'm in! Who do we have to kill? 8*) -ajr ------------------------------[ <- Message 18 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950715 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Mr Ian Stuart <Ian.Stuart@ed.ac.uk> Date: Fri, 14 Jul 1995 14:22:25 +0000 Subject: Re: truncated messages On 14 Jul 95, Tom Rowe wrote: > > Any chance of dropping this 'useful' design feature??? > Snip [ truncated by lro-digester (was 6 lines)] > Perhaps we could get that disabled if we all agree to snip out > portions of inclusions that don't bear on the topic of our reply. One vote for voluntary (?sp) cutting & ditching the helpful bit of majordomo ----** Ian Stuart (Computing Officer) +44 31 650 6205 Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, Edinburgh University. <http://www.vet.ed.ac.uk/> or <http://www.tardis.ed.ac.uk/~kiz/> ------------------------------[ <- Message 19 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950715 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Tom Rowe" <TROWE@AE.AGECON.WISC.EDU> Date: Fri, 14 Jul 1995 08:28:37 GMT -0600 Subject: Re: 101 diffs and lockers Daryl Webb writes: Snip > So how much does the lock-right camming in and out affect steering, I know a > no-spin in the rear will make a 109 twitchy and have always wondered about a > front applications ever since some bloke tried very hard to sell me one. My understanding of lockers of the Detroit genre are that they do make steering twitchy and are quite dangerous if you are driving somewhere (cliffedge road?) where you want total control of your steering. For the true lockers of the AirLocker style, ie. those that have some sort of dog that essentially makes the axles a single shaft between the wheels, you can't steer more that a degree or two. Since LR's don't have CV joints in the front axle, the two must turn at quite varying speeds, even more when you account for the different turning radii. In the front, if I had a choice, I'd go with the AirLocker and just use it to get out of a hole or what-have-you. This is second hand info as I have never had the money to install both front and rear, although I hope to soon get to it. Then maybe I can change my sig. Actually, back in the '80's when Al at DAP was racing a LR some, he had locking diffs that he sold installed in the 88 he raced. He said he saw little difference when the front was engaged as far as traction was concerned. Tom Tom Rowe UW-Madison Center for Dairy Research 608-265-6194, Fax:608-262-1578 trowe@ae.agecon.wisc.edu Four wheel drive allows you to get stuck in places even more inaccessible. ------------------------------[ <- Message 20 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950715 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Tom Rowe" <TROWE@AE.AGECON.WISC.EDU> Date: Fri, 14 Jul 1995 08:34:02 GMT -0600 Subject: Re: Gene Jockey > No, no, no... It's more like a disc-jockey. We're responsible for changing > your genes smoothly and efficiently and with such skill you'll never know [ truncated by lro-digester (was 6 lines)] > of need, eating vegetables with your beer, and understanding things like > Lucus electrics... Hey Charlie, now hold on a minute. My wife's a molecular biologist, spent years as a gene jocky, and I have it on good authority that mankind, no matter how much gene manipulation, will *never* understand Lucas electrics. Unless you think things like Jurassic Park are really possible. Tom Tom Rowe UW-Madison Center for Dairy Research 608-265-6194, Fax:608-262-1578 trowe@ae.agecon.wisc.edu Four wheel drive allows you to get stuck in places even more inaccessible. ------------------------------[ <- Message 21 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950715 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Mike Rooth <M.J.Rooth@lut.ac.uk> Subject: Re: Gene Jockey Date: Fri, 14 Jul 95 15:03:20 BST Oh come on Tom! *No-one* beleives Jurassic Park is possible. Those Jeeps and Toyotas are *totally* unbelievable. Cheers Mike Rooth ------------------------------[ <- Message 22 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950715 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 1995 15:06:56 +0100 From: cw117@mole.bio.cam.ac.uk (Charlie Wright) Subject: Re: truncated messages I think voluntary docking is a much better idea as well, but auto-docking would probably still help the digest-folk. They should (in theory) have the original copy in the same digest, while we impulsive real-timers may have thrown it away... certainly I would vote for a less stringent chopper for the real-time list... six lines should not upset it. Alternatively you can defeat it by losing the ">" mark if you think the enclosure is crucial. That effects the same result as voluntary chopping and still edits out the 'accidental' or 'lazy' inclusion of a whole message in the reply. Charlie C. R. Wright Dept. of Genetics +44 (0)1223 333970 telephone Univ. of Cambridge +44 (0)1223 333992 telefax Downing Street, Cambs. cw117@mole.bio.cam.ac.uk CB2 3EH, England ------------------------------[ <- Message 23 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950715 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 1995 15:06:38 +0100 From: cw117@mole.bio.cam.ac.uk (Charlie Wright) Subject: Re: Proper Land-Rover beer.... At 9:01am 14/7/95, Alan Richer/CAM/Lotus >I really should formulate a recipe to honor our aluminum friends. The only >problem is [ truncated by lro-digester (was 7 lines)] >Line Eater Fodder But how much fodder began? I don't know, I did a bit of brewing in my undergrad days, and you get some interesting and unexpected results from additives (citrus in the case of my attempts at a 'mead'). I suspect a little EP90 (unused) might give that sulpher an coal-tar tang so reminicent of my own greatest weakness... a single-cask strength Islay Malt Whisky. Ahhh. C. R. Wright Dept. of Genetics +44 (0)1223 333970 telephone Univ. of Cambridge +44 (0)1223 333992 telefax Downing Street, Cambs. cw117@mole.bio.cam.ac.uk CB2 3EH, England ------------------------------[ <- Message 24 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950715 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 1995 15:07:13 +0100 From: cw117@mole.bio.cam.ac.uk (Charlie Wright) Subject: Re: Gene Jockey At 9:34am 14/7/95, Tom Rowe wrote: >> of need, eating vegetables with your beer, and understanding things like >> Lucus electrics... >understand Lucas electrics. Unless you think things like Jurassic >Park are really possible. >Tom Hey, sometimes you just gotta stretch the truth... keep the audience's attention. Charlie C. R. Wright Dept. of Genetics +44 (0)1223 333970 telephone Univ. of Cambridge +44 (0)1223 333992 telefax Downing Street, Cambs. cw117@mole.bio.cam.ac.uk CB2 3EH, England ------------------------------[ <- Message 25 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950715 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Russell Burns <burns@cisco.com> Subject: Re: Gene Jockey Date: Fri, 14 Jul 95 7:27:39 PDT > Hey Charlie, now hold on a minute. My wife's a molecular biologist, > spent years as a gene jocky, and I have it on good authority that [ truncated by lro-digester (was 7 lines)] > Park are really possible. > Tom I think the problem is in trying to understand Lucas electrics. My experience with Lucas electricks is that it is in a constant state of flux (pun intended). The trick is not to attempt to "fix" the problem, but to wait for it to change. Sometimes one has to influnce the rate of change, either speed it up, or slow it down, but is is usless to try to stop the change. Russ 94 d-90 91 R-Rover > Tom Rowe > UW-Madison Center for Dairy Research [ truncated by lro-digester (was 13 lines)] > Four wheel drive allows you to get > stuck in places even more inaccessible. ------------------------------[ <- Message 26 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950715 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Mr Ian Stuart <Ian.Stuart@ed.ac.uk> Date: Fri, 14 Jul 1995 16:09:19 +0000 Subject: A test to see which address chops the bottom off This has been sent to lro@team.net & Land-Rover-Owner@uk.stratus.com I want to see which one (if either) leaves the bottom two lines in place :-) ----** Ian Stuart (Computing Officer) +44 31 650 6205 Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, Edinburgh University. <http://www.vet.ed.ac.uk/> or <http://www.tardis.ed.ac.uk/~kiz/> ------------------------------[ <- Message 27 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950715 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Mr Ian Stuart <Ian.Stuart@ed.ac.uk> Date: Fri, 14 Jul 1995 16:09:19 +0000 Subject: A test to see which address chops the bottom off This has been sent to lro@team.net & Land-Rover-Owner@uk.stratus.com I want to see which one (if either) leaves the bottom two lines in place :-) ----** Ian Stuart (Computing Officer) +44 31 650 6205 Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, Edinburgh University. <http://www.vet.ed.ac.uk/> or <http://www.tardis.ed.ac.uk/~kiz/> ------------------------------[ <- Message 28 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950715 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: BobandSueB@aol.com Date: Fri, 14 Jul 1995 11:39:43 -0400 Subject: Re: #1(2) The Land Rover Owner Daily Digest RE:(clutch) In a message dated 95-07-14 04:36:18 EDT, you write: >> This Clutch is a 9 1/2" . and is fully assembled. One piece for the disk, >one >> complete pressure plate springs and all ready to introduce to the flywheel, > [ truncated by lro-digester (was 6 lines)] >> surface and new springs, also don't want to fool around with the [ truncated by lro-digester (was 17 lines)] >------------------------------ >Date: Thu, 13 Jul 1995 07:04:50 -0700 (PDT) >From: David R (About A1 clutch rebuilders Disk P48348, Pressure plate Assem.X47348) Hi, This clutch was 9 1/2 " diaphragm, just like the original (1969-88). One thing I liked better than a 65 version was the way the flat disc (that the release bearing pressed against), is held on to the fingers. On this one, the thing is retained by being slotted to all fingers, the (original??) on the 65 had three thin steel bands that two were dangling. By the way, this was listed in their catalog for the L/R. It is not a substitute or cross reference from another vehicle. I believe we found it under Rover cars Land-Rover. Speaking of cross references, when I put the 4cyl 1962 chev nova engine in my 51-80, I noticed the chev clutch spline seemed to fit the tranny (70) perfectly,but I used L/R clutch. Regards Bob Bernard ------------------------------[ <- Message 29 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950715 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 1995 11:42:27 -0400 (EDT) From: Dixon Kenner <dkenner@emr1.emr.ca> Subject: Re: Proper Land-Rover beer.... On Fri, 14 Jul 1995, Charlie Wright wrote: > interesting and unexpected results from additives (citrus in the case of my > attempts at a 'mead'). I suspect a little EP90 (unused) might give that > sulpher an coal-tar tang so reminicent of my own greatest weakness... a > single-cask strength Islay Malt Whisky. Ahhh. Barkshack Ginger mead is pretty good stuff. Had good experience with the stuff (grin>. Its just the wait... About 3 years to get really good. As per the Islay, a man to my own heart. Love the stuff... :*) Rgds, Dixon ------------------------------[ <- Message 30 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950715 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: DANCSC@aol.com Date: Fri, 14 Jul 1995 12:02:44 -0400 Subject: Re: #1(2) The Land Rover Owner Daily Digest In a message dated 95-07-14 04:37:13 EDT, you write: >Does anyone know when ESPN will broadcast this? >Or when and where is the actual thing being held? ------------------------------[ <- Message 31 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950715 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: DANCSC@aol.com Date: Fri, 14 Jul 1995 12:08:14 -0400 Subject: Re: #1(2) Camel Trophy In a message dated 95-07-14 04:37:13 EDT, you write: >Does anyone know when ESPN will broadcast this? >Or when and where is the actual thing being held? um.. it already happened, they were dealing with mayan temples and such this year.. lots of injuries, people getting airlifted out, and the works, I saw the date for an ESPN showing, but I forgot it,sadly I lost all the pages I had printed out, for a while there was a fellow giving the daily play by play on the net here... Really exciting this year. Dan of Rosa ------------------------------[ <- Message 32 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950715 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 1995 09:07:27 +0100 From: cs@crl.com (Michael Carradine) Subject: Re: Replacement Bumbers Disco Bastiaan Houtkooper <zebra@xs4all.nl> writes: >I am looking for replacement bumbers for the "plastic"ones on my '95 Disco I would like to have a "real"strong Rover again! ( I am also interested in drawings of home made designs) Here's one of our favorite home made design drawings, detail __=== ____________ | __/_]_]] __ / --> .(_______). / _] | ______(o)___(o)_______ / / | \ \ | disco \ \ | \ \ |_____ \ \_____ \ frame real strong bumper \ ____] \_____ \ \__ \___] Michael Carradine Carradine Studios cs@crl.com Architect Architecture Development Planning Pgr 510-945-5000 NCARB RIBA PO Box 99, Orinda, CA 94563 USA Ph/Fax 510-988-0900 Mercedes-Benz Unimog 4x4 WWW page at: http://www.crl.com/~cs/unimog.html ------------------------------[ <- Message 33 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950715 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 95 09:21 MST From: jhoward@argus.lowell.edu (James D. Howard II) Subject: Re: Aerodynamically speaking.... >James Howard of Flagstaff write about drafting off of an 18 >wheeler...It all depends upon how brave/foolish you are. Not very - I maintained a 2 second gap. Even at that distance, the vacuum was enough to pull me along. Tailgating is one of my pet peeves. James ------------------------------[ <- Message 34 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950715 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 95 09:26 MST From: jhoward@argus.lowell.edu (James D. Howard II) Subject: Re: Anybody ever A/C a Series IIa? >Due to lung problems, i have been advised to not own a car without air >conditioning. With my present Mazda, this isn't a problem. However, >old Churchill cannot become my daily driver unless I can figure out how >to cram an air conditioner under the hood or elsewhere. Do you need AC for the filtered air, or the cool air? Last time I was in Washignton DC, Hertz was out of the subcompacts I reserved. And compacts. And midsizes. They gave me a Crown Victoria. Once I got over feeling like a State Trooper, I noticed whenever I was in it, my allergies went completely away. It turns out it had those micron air filters in the ventilation system. It made me consider putting some in front of a big fan inside my Land Rover, though, like a lot of my projects, I haven't gotten around to trying it. Probably because the pollen has not been that bad this year. James ------------------------------[ <- Message 35 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950715 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Alan Richer/CAM/Lotus <Alan_Richer/CAM/Lotus.LOTUS@crd.lotus.com> Date: 14 Jul 95 12:31:15 EDT Subject: Tutorial: On the repair of wiper motors Dixon: Here's the revised copy of the wiper motor article. I don't think I've been excessively wordy, but you as editor know best.. 8*). If possible, retain the title. I'm having an idea or two at making this a series of easy how-to-do-it article of this type. Opinions? Yours, Alan What the hell, I may as well type. I cant work on the beast....8*( Article begins: Having just had the unmitigated pleasure of reworking the wiper motors on my Series IIa 109 pickup, I've decided to pull the lessons learned in this process together into a tutorial for those fortunate souls who haven't had this pleasure... if that's what you want to call it. First off, this applies to the Lucas motors used on Series II and IIa vehicles. These are the newer motors with the rounded casings. The older motors, with their squared-off casings, from what I am told are mechanically similar but I haven't had one apart to check this personally, so beware. Secondly, any road vehicle must have functional windshield wipers. This means that they have to be on the truck and working or the local constabulary can and will pull you over and ban your vehicle from the road for this. If you're going to rework your motors, plan on doing the job in one sitting if at all possible. On to the show, then.... 1: Dismounting the motor from the truck: The motors on my car were held in place by a double-nut on a threaded shaft. Two of these were used to mount each motor, and both were badly corroded on my example. The threaded shafts ended up unscrewing from the motors, and are being replaced with the proper thread of stainless-steel bolt. With the wiper blade removed by loosening the mounting bolt and pulling it off the shaft, the motor was free to be withdrawn into the cab. I got off relatively unscathed in this process. I have heard of cases where the wiper mount, motor and windscreen have corroded themselves into an immovable mess, and one case where a windscreen had to be scrapped because the corroded hardware could not be removed (Hi, Dixon!). Replacement parts for the mounting bits are available, but make sure to protect the wiper shaft if you have to resort to force in removing the motor. Take care with it and expect to use penetrating oil and persuasion if yours are badly corroded. Also, for your own peace of mind, expect to replace the mounting studs. They can be easily fabricated from stainless-steel threaded stock, or barring that, cut-down bolts of the proper size. The two wires on the motor were then disconnected, noting the respective terminals they attached to. Pay attention here, as one of the terminals is mounted o the motor shell (and as such is grounded to the chassis). NOTE: For those of us thinking of converting positive ground cars to negative ground, these motors work quite well with either polarity grounded. They turn the same way with either polarity to the shell of the motor. 2: Disassembling the motor for cleaning: Once on the bench, I ran each motor with a 12-volt power supply. Both dragged badly, indicating that the gear grease had congealed. I removed the rear cover of the motor by removing the brass slotted nut at the center of the blade control and the two machine screws at the left and right sides of the rear cover. After this, the rear cover was free to come off, only needing a bit of persuasion with a plastic mallet to come free. Removal of the front cover was a bit more involved. The first item to be removed was a small metal block trough which the wiper shaft passed. With this block removed, the shaft spring could be released by straightening a crimped washer holding the wiper shaft in the motor. Straightening this removed the tension from the locking spring for the shaft, allowing it to slide back out through the motor. Instead of the crimped washer, I am told that some of the motors have a circlip fitted into the groove. Either way, disassembly doesn't change, but be careful not to lose the clip if so equipped. With this fastener out, the three nuts holding the front cover on can be removed. 3: Motor cleanup and check-out: Once you get to this point, your first reaction is going to be disgust at the condition and amount of filthy, pasty grease that is all over the inside of the gear case. That is precisely why we're here, as this grease is causing many problems and must be renewed. Before we disassemble anything, let's have a good look at what we're disassembling. Looking at the gearcase end, the first thing you'll see is a 110-pitch gear drilled with an offset bearing. In that bearing is the pin from a shaft that runs to a follower arm with a hole down its center. This is the bit that the wiper shaft comes out of. Under the 110-pitch gear is a double gear, which engages both the edge of the 110-pitch gear and the motor shaft. This intermediate gear is made of phenolic and, I am told, can disintegrate if the motor is abused with heavy loads. The motor shaft runs through the central casting into the back half, where the windings, rotor and switching are. What I'll be detailing here is a general cleanup/greasing/inspection. This cleared up 99% of the problems on both my motors, and seems like the favorite mode of failure for this design. If, however, once you clean up the grease and such and the motor still runs slowly or not at all, then you may have an electrical fault in the rotor or commutator coil. The repair of these is beyond the scope of this article, but it can be done by an electric motor shop if replacement parts are not available. If this is the case, though, check the brushes for proper contact and look for broken wires and similar problems. This could also be the problem, and could still be an easy fix. Now comes the fun bit, where we get REALLY dirty. Fill a small container with grease solvent - personally I like the newer orange-based stuff, as it's friendlier to the environment and my lungs. Whatever you do, don't use acetone or any cleaner that might be unfriendly to the electrical insulation on the wiring. If you can't get the orange-based cleaner, I have it on good authority that WD-40 will remove the grease without removing the wire insulation. (Hi again, Dixon!) Working carefully, remove the gears from the front of the motor and clean them in the solvent, using a toothbrush to get out the stubborn bits of gunk from the gearteeth. DON'T soak the fiber gear for an extended period - it WILL have problems if you do. Also clean the pins that are on the shaft to the follower arm of accumulated crud. Also, get a cotton swab into the bearing holes in the casting and clean them out to eliminate the old grease completely. We want to remove the follower arm from the casting to give it a good cleaning inside and out. if yours are like mine, the edges of the back of the hollow shaft are mushroomed, stopping it from sliding out. In this case CAREFULLY file away the burrs and work the shaft out of the bearings. DON'T FORCE IT OUT! You'll eat the bearings. Clean the inside hollow of the shaft with solvent, as well as the inside of the bearings the hollow shaft rode in. Use a cotton swab with solvent, being careful to keep the solvent off the electrical bits. The motor rotor's the next bit we want to deal with. Its two bronze bushings need to be cleaned and regreased. This part is tricky - If you don't feel comfortable after reading it through, then skip it if the rotor turns freely and runs OK. Remove the two nuts holding the rear bearing in place. It will slide up the motor shaft, and the carbon brushes will disengage from the copper contacts. WATCH OUT FOR THE BRUSHES! If yours is like mine, they will be slung forcefully out of the motor, landing several feet away. If lost, don't panic. Most hardware stores can provide brushes for small power tools that can be made to serve nicely with a bit of filing. As a matter of fact, I've replaced the brushes in both my motors anyway, as they were badly worn. Pivot the rear bearing assembly out of the way, being careful of the wires from the brushes to the coil below. If you're comfortable with soldering, it's much easier to simply disconnect the coil wires from the rear bearing assembly, noting which went where. With this, the rotor can be withdrawn from the stator. Clean its bearing surfaces with solvent, also the bearings themselves. 4: Reassembly: First thing to go back in is the motor rotor. Grease its bearing surfaces with a good coat of an all-purpose grease, and reinsert it into the hole in the stator. Fitting the rear bearing is a bit involved. You need to hold the brushes open with the points of a needlenose plier and slide the bearing back over the rear rotor shaft, being careful of the attached wires at all times. This is where removing the coil wires pays off, as you can slip the assembly back on much easier if you don't have the 3- dimensional motion restriction of the wires. It's easier if you present the bearing assembly so that the end of the rotor shaft can slip straight back into the bearing - hold it straight! It seems tricky, but it can be done! At worst tie the brushes back with a bit of wire so you can devote both hands to engaging the shaft. Reattach the rear bearing with the two nuts removed earlier and tighten. If you removed the coil wires or broke one off, now is the time to resolder them. Now, grease the bearings of each of the gears and put them back in place in the front of the casting. The fiber gear goes in first, then the 110-pitch gear, then reinsert the hollow shaft you took out earlier, making sure to grease all of the bearings and pivot points as you put it back together. A NOTE ON GREASE: You might want to make very sure that the lubricant you use has proper cold-weather characteristics. Some all-purpose lubricants congeal in cold weather, making the operation of the wipers very difficult. I personally used a silicon-based lubricant called Syl-Glide, as it advertised constant viscosity at colder temperatures, and up as high as +400F. Remember, these motors are going to take some pretty nasty temperature extremes sitting there in the sun, so be careful with the lubricants you choose. Once you have all of the bits back in properly, turn the rotor of the motor by hand to make sure nothing's binding. If all's well, put the front gearcase cover back on and test-run the motor, either on the bench or off your Rover's battery. If it passes, great!. Now we can put the wiper shaft back into the motor and complete reassembly. Reinsert the wiper shaft from the rear of the motor. Over the shaft from the front of the motor, slide on the cleaned tension spring and either the washer you removed to free it, or a circlip of the proper size. Personally, I went with the circlips to allow for periodic opening and regreasing of the motors. 5: Remounting: Remounting the motors is simpler than removing them, as you've already caused all the damage you're going to...<grin>. If the mounting rubbers and hardware are in good shape, all you need to do is bolt the motor back on, perhaps smearing a bit of silicone grease on the sealing rubbers where the motor shaft makes contact with them. Also, a little RTV sealant under the aluminum mounting block helps eliminate water leaks at that point. Make sure to clean away the excess, though, for a neat appearance. If you need to replace the hardware, the cast parts and the rubber gaskets are available from most Rover suppliers. The threaded rods and nuts can be had locally, though, if they're all you need. Aligning the wiper blades may be a bit tricky, but shouldn't be a problem with a bit of attention to detail. Present the motor to its installation spot on the windscreen with the rear handle in the parked (off) position, then mount and fasten the wiper blade where it should be (pointing to the right while facing the wiper blade from outside the car). This makes sure everyone's in agreement as to the way things need to go when operating. 6: Conclusion: Cleaning and servicing the wiper motors on your Series II or IIa is a simple, stress-free task that can save you a lot of headaches and money down the road. These small motors are well-built, and with a modicum of service will soldier on reliably in the rain effectively forever. Al Richer ------------------------------[ <- Message 36 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950715 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Alan Richer/CAM/Lotus <Alan_Richer/CAM/Lotus.LOTUS@crd.lotus.com> Date: 14 Jul 95 12:32:45 EDT Subject: Re: Wiper motor article: I apologize, folks. I slipped and sent the revised copy of it to the list instead of direcly to Dixon. Again, my sincere apologies. Al R. ------------------------------[ <- Message 37 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950715 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: ROB@HARV-EHS.mhs.harvard.edu Date: Fri, 14 Jul 1995 13:33:45 -0500 (EST) Subject: AC for IIa Willing to trade '84FJ60 Toyota Landcruiser with air conditioning for series IIa AND a pile of cash to keep the IIa going....Taylor.....Nah Just kidding, I'll keep my TLC a little while longer and my names not Taylor its Rob...I thought LRO's drank Pimms?? Friday? YES! ------------------------------[ <- Message 38 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950715 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 1995 13:54:12 -0400 (EDT) From: Dixon Kenner <dkenner@emr1.emr.ca> Subject: Re: Wiper motor article: On 14 Jul 1995, Alan Richer/CAM/Lotus wrote: > I apologize, folks. I slipped and sent the revised copy of it to the > list instead of direcly to Dixon. > Again, my sincere apologies. Al R. I am sure they don't mind... :-) Besides, they get to see the type of stuff that appears in OVLR's monthly newletter... Rgds, Dixon PS. I chopped the windscreen up to rescue the motor because I have more windscreens than I know what to do with. As far as I am concerned, they are disposable. The motors on the other hand are a bit harder to get a hold of... Windscreens don't break, these things do... The last bent windscreen I had I fixed with a sledge and a concrete pad. Looks fine now... ------------------------------[ <- Message 39 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950715 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: LRDEFNDR3@aol.com Date: Fri, 14 Jul 1995 14:16:23 -0400 Subject: re: loose exhaust bolts Peter C. Parsons writes, > My just-delivered Disco has foldover metal tabs (Part >of the gasket?) to keep the subject nuts from vibrating >loose or off. Apparently, someone took this problem >for action when it came up a while back, and the factory >now turns out Discos with the engineering change >incorporated. A case of the system working!!! I'm done lurking, gotta butt in. I have a 94 NA D90. My 3.9 also has the tabs designed to hold the exhaust manifold bolts inplace...shame that they don't work. I was plowing through the swamps of North Carolina with about 12k miles on the odometer when I a heard "Blap blap blap" reminiscent of my old Ser IIa which has an exhaust leak, and oil leak and transmission leak...etc. Well, I stopped to investigate the offending sound and discovered that one, no.. two exhaust manifold bolts were missing and three others were loose and nearly gone. The "blaping" sound was from one of the indvidual exhaust port gaskets pivoting down on the remaining bottom bolt and blocking the exhaust. "Gee, that shouldn't have happened", said the service manager. And I was worried that the endearing quirks of my Ser IIa would be absent in my brandy new Defender. Glad to see that I'll have some things to keep me interested. Oh yeah, that clanking sound discussed in the last few days.. got it, or is mine a clunk. Probably more of a clunk. I was writing it off to driver tecnique and a firm clutch compared to the IIa. At 32k miles I don't hear it any more. She's running like a top with just enough endearing quirks. Happy Rovering, Thom Thom Bruce LRDEFNDR3@aol.com ------------------------------[ <- Message 40 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950715 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 1995 19:22:04 +0100 From: cw117@mole.bio.cam.ac.uk (Charlie Wright) Subject: Re: AC for IIa At 1:33pm 14/7/95, ROB@HARV-EHS.mhs.harvard.edu wrote: >Taylor its Rob...I thought LRO's drank Pimms?? Friday? YES! Only when they live in Cambridge... cw C. R. Wright Dept. of Genetics +44 (0)1223 333970 telephone Univ. of Cambridge +44 (0)1223 333992 telefax Downing Street, Cambs. cw117@mole.bio.cam.ac.uk CB2 3EH, England ------------------------------[ <- Message 41 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950715 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 1995 14:56:33 -0400 (EDT) From: Dixon Kenner <dkenner@emr1.emr.ca> Subject: Re: Beaches making us soft!!! On Fri, 14 Jul 1995, Daryl Webb brings up a subject close to heart: > > > Guinness, Bah, *Real* land-rover owners drink Coopers Ale or Extra Stout.. > > Send a case... :-) Container might be more accurate though... [ truncated by lro-digester (was 7 lines)] > thicker creamier Guinness. Yum on cold nights (see below) Hey why dont you > come over for Blinman 1997?? So, like who makes this Coopers stuff? A quick trip to the provincial liquor monopoly could get a case imported (albeit over a four+ month period...<ahem>) What is a Blinman '97? > Ok I would have agreed with this when I lived in Darwin but now I'm here in > "temperate" Adelaide its always too cold to go to the beach.... > (Ok so I'm a cold weather woose, take me back to the tropics NOW) > (this should bring a few SA lurkers out in the open :-) Too cold to go to the beach? I didn't think anything ever got below a normal beer temperature there. You need to visit Maine or New Hampshire for a dip in the North Altantic... :-) Eye opening, then again so are the Great Lakes about now still... > "special compliance" plate (ie personal import of non OZ available car eg > TR8's). I wonder what Leslie knows (you still with us ??) Probably duties > and taxes would kill the appeal.... Leslie knows the USA... TR-8's eh... nice cars... Nearly had one before. Might stil get one eventually... Ahhh, Guinness time in two hours! (hi Ben!) ------------------------------[ <- Message 42 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950715 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: DANCSC@aol.com Date: Fri, 14 Jul 1995 15:24:41 -0400 Subject: was it Tom Rowe asking about camel trophy? In a message dated 95-07-14 04:37:13 EDT, you write: >Does anyone know when ESPN will broadcast this? >Or when and where is the actual thing being held? um.. it already happened, they were dealing with mayan temples and such this year.. lots of injuries, people getting airlifted out, and the works, I saw the date for an ESPN showing, but I forgot it,sadly I lost all the pages I had printed out, for a while there was a fellow giving the daily play by play on the net here... Really exciting this year. Dan of Rosa ------------------------------[ <- Message 43 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950715 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Bill Yerazunis <crash@concentra.com> Date: Fri, 14 Jul 1995 16:27:59 -0400 Subject: Re: Disco Exhaust Bolts Heck, My bolts did the same thing! Driver's side. Two missing, one loose. Replaced 'em with stainless steel. No problems since on that- BUT now the exhaust heat shield keeps rattling whenever the engine is warmed up and at idle. All the bolts are tight. Anybody got a solution? -Bill Y. (& Sally Xray- '94 Disco) ------------------------------[ <- Message 44 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950715 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 95 18:01:44 EDT From: tonyb@ejv.com (Tony Bromberg) Subject: Range Rover rusty tailgate repair At one point we all face this problem. A rusted tail gate. :^( Mine just started to rust in several places. Is it possible to take it apart, acid dip it and refinish. Or perhaps some other way of treating the rust? Thanks TonyB ------------------------------[ <- Message 45 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950715 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 95 18:28 EST From: Biosource <0003479098@mcimail.com> Subject: RR console heat problem. Thanks to everyone for the advice on the missing problem in a 90 Range Rover. Problem #2 is heat coming through the center console into the passenger compartment. It is especially irritating on very hot days. Is this normal for a Range Rover, or was someone mucking around underneath with the heat shielding? Also, is there a market for used three-spoke factory alloy wheels off my 90? I put on a set of 95 five-spoke cyclones and will part with the old wheels for any reasonable offer (or will trade for factory running boards). Regards, Guy della-Cioppa Vacaville, California 90 Range Rover (Beluga Black, of course) 707-446-8461 Biosource@mcimail.com Guy_dell@aol.com ------------------------------[ <- Message 46 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950715 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 1995 13:51:46 -1000 Subject: Help Me Unsubscribe From: Paul Sturm <psturm@ilhawaii.net> -- [ From: Paul Sturm * EMC.Ver #2.05 ] -- I'm a happy Rover owner on the Big Island of Hawaii--but an unhappy Digest recipient. I don't have time to read all this material, and receiving it here in the middle of the Pacific is costing me plenty. I've sent several "unsubscribe" messages as indicated. I always get an acknowledgment, but the Digest keeps coming. Could someone please help me turn things off? Also, I believe that's a abbreviated or less frequent version. I do I get that instead? Regards. ------------------------------[ <- Message 47 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950715 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Sat, 15 Jul 1995 02:38:20 +0200 From: terje@tvnorge.no (Terje Krogdahl) Subject: NLRK 20th anniversary rally The Norwegian Landr-Rover Club will hold its 20th anniversary rally in Hunderfossen, just north of Lillehammer, Norway, the site of the 1994 Winter Olympics. The dates are August 8-13. Further information may be found on my web pages at http://www.tvnorge.no/~terje/nlrk/index.e.html in English, or http://www.tvnorge.no/~terje/nlrk/index.html in Norwegian. Most of the information is typed in from the club newsletter 4WD. Although I am not assiciated with the rally organizers, feel free to contact me with any questions you may have. The pages are still under construction, I'm going to include a road description for the Bergen-Lillehammer route for those who arrive by ferry from England. Other road descriptions may be available upon request. Have fun, TK terje@tvnorge.no http://www.tvnorge.no/~terje/index.e.html 1972 88" SIII (Currently in bits and pieces, hopefully a working Landie by August...) ------------------------------[ <- Message 48 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950715 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: ecoethic@rcinet.com Date: Fri, 14 Jul 1995 22:37:30 -0400 Subject: Valve guide seal replacement For John Putnam & David John Place: I recently changed the valve guide seals on my Ser. III petrol using two screwdrivers, an old brake adjusting tool, and a magnetic probe to retrieve small pieces. I took the rocker assembly off, removed the rockers and springs, and reattached the shaft to use as a fulcrum point. I covered the shaft with masking tape to protect the surface. I was able to replace all of the seals and reassemble everything in only eleven hours! I only lost one part in all that time, I suffered no injuries, but I am afraid I was unkind to all who entered my garage during this time. You have to be a masochist or a very cheap person to go through this process, but I did eliminate the smoking that always occurred on start-up (210,000 miles) and the seals only cost $2-2.50 a piece. I will need a full valve job someday, but for right now my compression readings are between 155-165 lbs. The old seals had up to a sixteenth of an inch gap and were of no use. I suspect that many of us could benefit from seal replacement in place of a valve job. The use of TRW Teflon seals sounds like a good solution to a quality setup when the time comes. I really doubt that these umbrella type rubber seals last much more than 50,000 to 60,000 miles. If any one wants to attempt what I did, good luck, and keep a tarp over the engine area to catch the springs when they fly (not if). I did not, and I am still missing a spring keeper that bounced off the ceiling, the workbench, to parts unknown. What is needed, in reflection, is an L-shaped tool that will depress the springs in a proper manner. Has anyone out there ever devised or heard of such a tool? It sure would save much wasted time. Walter Pokines Tipp City, Ohio 60 II, 67 IIA, 72 III, 72 III ------------------------------[ <- Message 49 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950715 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 1995 23:15:50 -0500 (CDT) From: David John Place <umplace@cc.UManitoba.CA> Subject: Re: Valve guide seal replacement Well there a number of great vavle depressers to do the job. The best looks like a pair of pliers and the way it works is that two arms go under the bottom of the springs while a plate pushes down on top of the springs. There is a hole in the plate to take the two keepers out. Another variety uses something like a "C" clamp to accomplish the same thing. I have often used my drill press with a semi-circular disk so I can fetch the keepers out. Of course this requires the head off. Finally, there is the kind of "L" shaped thing you discribed used mostly for small block Chevs to depress the springs. I found that a flat bar nail puller did just as good a job if I make the nail pulling "V" a bit bigger so I could get the keepers out. By the way for the fellows who wanted to grind their own valves, You can use an electric drill but you need the kind with reverse on it. You have to reverse the direction or you will get a poor lap job. I have a Snap-On tool like an egg beater type drill which automatically reverses every 1/4 turn as you grind and it does a good job. Better still take the thing to an auto machine shop and make sure you ask for a three angle valve job. You can't beat what a machine that does three angles does over the run of the mill old single angle machines which just rotated the valve against a grinding stone. Dave VE4PN ------------------------------[ <- Message 50 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950715 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Russell Burns <burns@cisco.com> Subject: Re: RR console heat problem. Date: Fri, 14 Jul 95 21:46:39 PDT I found that my console got hotter when I removed the front air dam. I constructed a temporary one last year when I towed a trailer to the Rover rally in Colorado. It ran cooler as it funneled more air over the trans. I may build another for this years trip, but make it removable for offroad. It scooped up a lot of mud. Russ Burns 91 R-ROver 94 D-90 Both headed west for the rally. > To change subscription write to: Majordomo@Land-Rover.Team.Net [ truncated by lro-digester (was 24 lines)] > Biosource@mcimail.com > Guy_dell@aol.com ------------------------------[ <- Message 51 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950715 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: LANDROVER@delphi.com Date: Sat, 15 Jul 1995 01:59:35 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: Proper Land-Rover beer.... Spenny (et al.) speak the *unspeakable* > Alan writes.... > Speaking as a homebrewer, [ truncated by lro-digester (was 11 lines)] > Land Rover Stout... > Looks like 90wt., tastes like heaven. Holy Crow! We all caught hell from mum last year for bringing up the subject of beer on a Land Rover mailing list.. (blast shield up!) Cheers Mike ------------------------------[ <- Message 52 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950715 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: LANDROVER@delphi.com Date: Sat, 15 Jul 1995 01:59:45 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: Gene Jockey > But don't thank me, it's only my job... ;-) Hey Charlie... How do you tell the sex of a chromosome?? Take down it's jeans... Heard it already, eh? Cheers Mike ------------------------------[ <- Message 53 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950715 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
END OF LAND ROVER OWNER DIGEST Input: messages 51 lines 2287 [forwarded 174 whitespace 636] Output: lines 1854 [content 1052 forwarded 107 (cut 67) whitespace 600]
Back | Forward | |
---|---|---|
Photos & text Copyright 1990-2011 Bill Caloccia, All rights reserved. Digest Messages Copyright 1990-2011 by the original poster or/and Bill Caloccia, All rights reserved.
|