[ First Message Last | Table of Contents | <- Digest -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
msg | Sender | lines | Subject |
1 | LANDROVER@delphi.com | 24 | Re: Prospective 2nd Land-Rover (Discover |
2 | LANDROVER@delphi.com | 38 | Re: Radio's, CB's and C.D in Land Ro |
3 | Kelly Minnick [minnick@j | 39 | Misc |
4 | Mike Rooth [M.J.Rooth@lu | 14 | Re: LR @ the Movies |
5 | Grettir Asmundarson [gre | 6 | unsubscribe lro-digest |
6 | Charlie Wright [cw117@mo | 38 | Re: The Land Rover Owner Daily Digest |
7 | "Keith Coman" [BAKC@gira | 7 | unsubscribe |
8 | BwanaE@aol.com | 16 | N. Cal. LWB for sale |
9 | Pierce Reid [70004.4011@ | 27 | Jeeps in snow |
10 | "Stefan R. Jacob" [10004 | 16 | Comfi seats in a 109 |
11 | "Stefan R. Jacob" [10004 | 29 | Re: Axle Straps |
12 | "Stefan R. Jacob" [10004 | 22 | Re: Questions |
13 | Steve Methley [sgm@hplb. | 35 | Re: Jeeps in snow |
14 | Dixon Kenner [dkenner@em | 13 | Re: Misc |
15 | "DOUG SACKINGER" [DOUG@K | 58 | More questions than anwers |
16 | maloney@wings.attmail.co | 27 | Disco US Prices |
17 | "Walter C. Swain" [wcswa | 33 | Re: Misc |
18 | Jon Humphrey [jh5r+@andr | 21 | Re: Radio's, CB's and C.D in Land Ro |
19 | Jon Humphrey [jh5r+@andr | 13 | DBrown |
20 | "TeriAnn Wakeman" [twak | 68 | Re: Leg Room |
21 | C Taylor Sutherland III | 16 | 2.25L 4-cyl questions. |
22 | jfhess@ucdavis.edu (John | 41 | rover life |
23 | "TeriAnn Wakeman" [twak | 23 | Re: 2.25L 4-cyl questions. |
24 | "Mugele, Gerry" [Gerry.M | 15 | Range Rover 4.0S |
25 | Dixon Kenner [dkenner@em | 24 | Re: 2.25L 4-cyl questions. |
26 | Mike Fredette [mfredett@ | 32 | [not specified] |
27 | "Mugele, Gerry" [Gerry.M | 81 | Why a L-R |
28 | Russell U Wilson [ruwst+ | 20 | Re: 2.25L 4-cyl questions. |
29 | mtalbot@InterServ.Com (M | 10 | Re: SIII Red Stop/Brake lens |
30 | Benjamin Allan Smith [be | 18 | [not specified] |
31 | Benjamin Allan Smith [be | 31 | [not specified] |
32 | CXKS46A@prodigy.com (MR | 17 | LRO, again.... |
33 | Easton Trevor [TEASTON@D | 24 | Rust Proofing/elusive 110's |
34 | Easton Trevor [TEASTON@D | 12 | Axle retainer straps |
35 | Pierce Reid [70004.4011@ | 15 | Jeep 4wd |
36 | mcdpw@pacific.pacific.ne | 20 | Brabyn Notoriety |
37 | DEBROWN@SRP.GOV | 58 | Discovery... |
38 | C Taylor Sutherland III | 34 | Sins of the net... |
39 | chrisste@clark.net (Chri | 16 | Dash Lites |
40 | Sanna@aol.com | 10 | Re: rover life |
41 | Larry_Soo@mindlink.bc.ca | 98 | [not specified] |
42 | Tom Stevenson [gbfv08@ud | 26 | Rapped knuckles & broken numberplate |
43 | "TeriAnn Wakeman" [twak | 25 | Re: Sins of the net... |
44 | CXKS46A@prodigy.com (MR | 27 | Alternators |
45 | Craig Murray [craigp@ocs | 31 | Re: Axle Straps |
46 | Larry_Soo@mindlink.bc.ca | 90 | [not specified] |
47 | Craig Murray [craigp@ocs | 30 | Re: 2.25L 4-cyl questions. |
48 | Steven M Denis [denis@os | 33 | Re: Leg Room |
49 | Mike Fredette [mfredett@ | 19 | [not specified] |
50 | David John Place [umplac | 11 | Re: rover life |
51 | "Russell G. Dushin" [dus | 22 | RRpurchases |
52 | David John Place [umplac | 11 | Re: Leg Room |
53 | "Russell G. Dushin" [dus | 25 | Re: Click and Clack on the Disco |
54 | "Russell G. Dushin" [dus | 15 | Re: Cheap 110s? |
55 | "Russell G. Dushin" [dus | 27 | Re: Axle Straps |
56 | Craig Murray [craigp@ocs | 25 | Re: Axle Straps |
57 | Steven M Denis [denis@o | 24 | Re: Leg Room |
58 | dwebb@waite.adelaide.edu | 35 | Re:3.9i series I |
59 | brabyn@skivs.ski.org (Jo | 14 | Re: Brabyn Notoriety |
60 | taylors@hubcap.clemson.e | 19 | Correction |
61 | brabyn@skivs.ski.org (Jo | 19 | Re: Jeeps in snow |
62 | jjbpears@ix.netcom.com ( | 54 | UK LR training spots |
63 | LANDROVER@delphi.com | 27 | Re: Radio's, CB's and C.D in Land Ro |
64 | LANDROVER@delphi.com | 26 | Re: Rapped knuckles & broken numberplate |
65 | rmodica@east.pima.edu | 25 | March LRO already? |
66 | Benjamin Allan Smith [be | 30 | [not specified] |
67 | ra.walker@qut.edu.au (Ro | 33 | HELP PLEASE - RIVNUTS !!!! |
68 | dwebb@waite.adelaide.edu | 42 | Guilt trip. |
69 | "Barry Dudley" [DUDLEY@g | 198 | UUENCODED file: SUM-V.CP part 1 of 1 |
70 | "Barry Dudley" [DUDLEY@g | 44 | REPLY TO MARK (OVERLANDING) |
71 | "Barry Dudley" [DUDLEY@g | 220 | Enclosure file: A-CP |
72 | mcdpw@pacific.pacific.ne | 29 | Re: 1989 vs 1988 Range Rovers |
From: LANDROVER@delphi.com Date: Tue, 28 Feb 1995 02:47:51 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: Prospective 2nd Land-Rover (Discover Hank sez... (heh,heh,heh) <G> > p.s. > Everyone see the L-Rs impersonating Russian military vehicles in last > night's "Op Center" on American Tee Wee? (Another Tom Clancy film. > Clancy used to be the insurance agent for some of my in-laws.) Hey! What are you doing watching TV if it's your annual conjugal visit?? Yup... saw them, thought they were Rovers, and decided they just couldn't be after seeing the way the canvas sagged full of rain water! What really got me was that they hadn't a clue as to where the warheads could have gone.. (Hint Hint... just follow the muddy trail from the 8x8!!) Cheers Mike ------------------------------[ <- Message 2 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950301 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: LANDROVER@delphi.com Date: Tue, 28 Feb 1995 03:18:09 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: Radio's, CB's and C.D in Land Ro Mark.. Believe it or not, there *is* a radio mounting location in a SerIII. It's not all that hard to find, but you might be better off disassembling the dash to install the radio... Got you worried yet? OK... Assuming you have LHD.. just to the right of the instrument panel there is a small space with the lever for the dash vent. Put your hand in there with your fingers pointing down and feel the front side (the side you can't see) of the dash. You should be able to feel the cutouts for the radio face and knobs. If your confused at this point (this is a bit silly!) there is a space in the center of the dash for additional guages. The radio mounts just to the left of that. The only problem that I could see with it is what if you have a leak from the dask vents, or a leak somewhere else that would cause water to settle in the dash tray?? Wet Radio Syndrome!! Dash tray? Yup! If you dissassemble the dash, you should find a "tray" that runs across the whole dash opening. Taking the dash apart is not hard, but you need some warm place to do it.. Lot's of plastic bits there which would probably snap in the cold weather.. (Love those plastic SerIII's) As to CB.. If you have a real small set, you could mount it somewhere on the dash tray.. I have a older CB, pretty big one and I mounted it below the dash, dead center, flush against the sloping part of the bottom of the dashboard. Doesn't interfere with the gearshift at all. Cheers Michael Loiodice E-MAIL landrover@delphi.com 166 W.Fulton St. VOICE (518) 773-2697 Gloversville NY, 12078 1972 Ser III 88 Petrol (Fern) R.I.P. 7 1971 Ser IIa 88 Petrol #:-}> 1965 Ser IIa 88 Petrol ------------------------------[ <- Message 3 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950301 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Kelly Minnick <minnick@joker.chinalake.navy.mil> Subject: Misc Date: Tue, 28 Feb 95 0:37:21 PST I have some misc. ramblings here... First off, has anyone had problems getting their packages from UK out of the hands of Federal Express? They have held up my order for over a week 'cause it has brake line clips, a clutch master reservior cap seal, brake drum screws etc., etc... I have ordered 3 previous orders using UPS with actual brake cylinders and repair kits and never had a problem! They must know my motor is running and I want to finish this restoration! 2. The folks at Turner say the single Barrel Weber's run too lean. Is this true? I have a rebuilt Zenith (new throttle bushings!). should I use this? I could jet the Weber richer if we know what jet to use! 3. Head gaskets... I have composite. Doesn't look like it can go on wrong (upside down...) How can you get the small Vs. big holes in the wrong location? Also, I didn't think you had to re-torque the composites??? 4. From what I have gathered/gleaned, the 89 Range Rover has the viscous center diff lock, chain Vs gear driven transfer case, 3.9L motor, updated seals in the power steering box (sure!), and updated auto-load leveler. Don't know if all of these are true, so someone else help us here! 5. The '87 R. Rover I had was prone to water fowling (ducks?) due to the high- pressure wash soaking the starter relay (second from the right). If you are not going to seal (hermetically) a relay, why put something as important as the starter relay out in the engine bay where in could very well see water? (enquiring engineering minds want to know!). 6. How much off of MSRP are people paying for these Disco's? The stripped is listing for $29,375 or something and $32,285 out the door. Down in S. Calif. there are waiting lists. You put your $1000 down and wait about 3 weeks. I don't mind waiting, but I hate the fact that there seems to bee no "dealing". All the dealers have the same price, too! So, if you want one, you have to pay that amount. By the way, $20K here buys a higher mileage 91 or a lower mileage 90... Have fun.... Kelly Minnick '73 88" Safari (now running AND not leaking) Ridgecrest, CA ------------------------------[ <- Message 4 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950301 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Mike Rooth <M.J.Rooth@lut.ac.uk> Subject: Re: LR @ the Movies Date: Tue, 28 Feb 95 9:01:33 GMT > Pierce Reid said >>FYI, it appears that all the (Tom) Clancy Movies feature > Land Rovers "somewhere" in them. [ truncated by lro-digester (was 14 lines)] > 110 shot with a wide-angle lens....but it looked awfully long. > Gerry 72 88 Are you sure it wasnt a 130?They *are* awfully long. Cheers Mike Rooth ------------------------------[ <- Message 5 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950301 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 95 03:13:49 -0700 From: Grettir Asmundarson <grettir@keflavik.wordperfect.com> Subject: unsubscribe lro-digest unsubscribe lro-digest ------------------------------[ <- Message 6 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950301 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 1995 11:16:01 +0001 (GMT) From: Charlie Wright <cw117@mole.bio.cam.ac.uk> Subject: Re: The Land Rover Owner Daily Digest As the American in Britain, I need too edit this: On Tue, 28 Feb 1995, Steve Firth wrote: > ChipEast@aol.com writes: > > Q: Why do the Brits drink warm beer? [ truncated by lro-digester (was 9 lines)] > 1) Our beer is not served warm, it is served cool. The problem is that > in the US beer is served far too cold for its own good. I can only guess No, American beers like Bud/Miller Lite/ad nauseum... are served cold _for their own good_. Not too cold for their own good. Anyone who has had any amount of warm American beer (those impatient university days...) knows this... the cold supresses the unpleasant flavor. By the same token, there are a growing number of fine American beers that should not be over chilled... > 2) What gives with the Lucas stuff? I find no problem with the Lucas parts > on any of my vehicles. I *do* find that the French (Ducellier) parts > are prone to breakdown. none I don't think there was anything electrical on our Peugeot that didn't go wrong... but the same could be said for my 109... until I began re-wiring with good copper wire, RS toggle switches, and Bosch relays. ;-) > Could it be (perchance) that the majority of vehicles of which we speak > are pre-'67 abused and subsequently restored examples? I think the way Mine's a 1970, one year younger than myself, and my electrics are still working pretty well. ;-) Charlie ------------------------------[ <- Message 7 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950301 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Keith Coman" <BAKC@giraffe.ru.ac.za> Date: Tue, 28 Feb 1995 13:14:01 GMT+0200 Subject: unsubscribe unsubscribe bakc@giraffe.ru.ac.za ------------------------------[ <- Message 8 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950301 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: BwanaE@aol.com Date: Tue, 28 Feb 1995 07:07:41 -0500 Subject: N. Cal. LWB for sale I'm posting this for a non-net rover owner who is offering the following for sale... please respond to him directly.... Herman Whittington at 209/768-3162. '62 LWB w/ pickup cab. 2.25 petrol, approx. 122,000 miles. Appears to be original, complete,with decent chassis. Call to discuss price. Regards, Eric. ------------------------------[ <- Message 9 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950301 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: 28 Feb 95 08:55:56 EST From: Pierce Reid <70004.4011@compuserve.com> Subject: Jeeps in snow << Mark Writes << "I guess my Jeep is crap in the snow, it's certainly not as good as your Range Rover". I << agreed and said goodbye. Jeeps have open differentials, which means only one wheel on each drive axle really works at a time in slippery conditions. Not only IMHO, is it less than satisfactory, it can be downright dangerous. Late model CJ's and YJ's are so bad in the snow that I would not even drive one unless it had Limited Slip Diffs installed. They will spin out for no reason at all. The "basic" 4wd option on the Cherokees is no better. You have to get the Command-Trak or something like that (full-time 4wd option) to get a decent system in the Jeep. Range Rovers and Defenders have full-time 4wd systems that put power to the wheels all the time and adapt the power output to the right wheels for the conditions. Best system in the world! Cheers, R. P. Reid ------------------------------[ <- Message 10 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950301 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: 28 Feb 95 09:38:50 EST From: "Stefan R. Jacob" <100043.2400@compuserve.com> Subject: Comfi seats in a 109 TeriAnn suggested > Well,you could purchase a set of Defender 90 seats & put them into your LR. Makes a world of difference, did that with my 109. Takes a minimal amount of drilling & bolting to make them fit. However, I canibalized them from a totalled Defender (scavenging as usual...). Wouldn't order them new, they're senselessly expensive... don't even ask. Stefan <Stefan R. Jacob, 100043.2400@CompuServe.com> ------------------------------[ <- Message 11 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950301 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: 28 Feb 95 09:39:59 EST From: "Stefan R. Jacob" <100043.2400@compuserve.com> Subject: Re: Axle Straps ... snip ... >... snip ... as they restrict suspension travel, as for the talk of bent prop > shafts, I have never seen one, and my sisters 88" has more suspension > travel than a 110" through extended shakels and very tired leaf springs! Right you are, mate, and that's precisely what they're supposed to do - restrict (downward) suspension travel. And it's *because* she has very tired leaf springs that your sis doesn't have a problem without her, er, straps. Take the case where someone has new, very strong HD springs fitted - downward movement on full articulation (or when 'lifting off') will ultimately be stopped by the axle slamming into the fully extended shocks which will take that sort of treatment only that long before they rip off. When they do and the axle lowers itself even further, next thing that is in danger of ripping is the brake hose - very bad. In addition, with a *long* wheel base, there's a real possibility that the rear propshaft will slip out of its joint or eat into the frame where it passes through the hole (someone else already pointed this out). All this is of course irrelevant as long as you only travel on-road or 'moderate' off-road. Still, the straps *should be there*, I definitely wouldn't consider them an 'optional item'. To go even a step further, I'm in fact seriously considering to retro-fit my raised RR with similiar straps for precisely the reasons mentioned... Stefan <Stefan R. Jacob, 100043.2400@CompuServe.com> ------------------------------[ <- Message 12 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950301 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: 28 Feb 95 09:39:22 EST From: "Stefan R. Jacob" <100043.2400@compuserve.com> Subject: Re: Questions Robert Kerner wants a raise... > ... snip ... The Toyota had the rear springs mounted above the > axels, and the u-bolts facing up. THis didn't change any of the suspensions ... snip ... > realize this would raise the center of gravity, but does this sound like a > crazy idea and would it cause other problems??? It would also then allow me You can't do that with Land Rover axles, the axle & springs are "made to fit" exactly as they are, they'd move all over the place and the U-bolts would snap if you did the other job. You have to raise it via the spring mounts and shackles (raises the chassis) plus larger tires if you want more diff clearance, giving due consideration to shocks, break hoses and prop shafts that might have to be adjusted to the new geometry. Stefan <Stefan R. Jacob, 100043.2400@CompuServe.com> ------------------------------[ <- Message 13 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950301 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Steve Methley <sgm@hplb.hpl.hp.com> Subject: Re: Jeeps in snow Date: Tue, 28 Feb 95 14:59:57 GMT Pierce Reid: > Range Rovers and Defenders have full-time 4wd systems that put power to the > wheels all the time and adapt the power output to the right wheels for the > conditions. Best system in the world! There's more to this I believe. It all depends on whether you're talking about the full time LR products with a viscous locking centre diff or not. If you are then I think I know what you're saying above, but there's no intelligence involved in picking the right wheels for the power. In the viscous diff case you essentially have two axle drive in slippy conditions. This is the same as 4wd in the series case and diff lock in the older RR etc. I find this a very predictable system in snow and mud. However driving an LR full time 4wd without diff lock is another matter: In snow the power will 'hunt around' all four wheels and is actually quite unnerving. If eg the front wheels momentarily spin but then find traction, the rears can then break lose and the process can repeat. A litle difficult to explain, very easy to see when it's happening. Of course you're supposed to lock the diff when this starts to happen. This ensures that both axles must spin a wheel simultaneously for all traction to be lost. BTW, if anyone still thinks they have 4wd with an open centre diff then just jack up _one_ wheel and try to drive off.... Best Regards, Steve. '79RR (manual diff lock) ------------------------------[ <- Message 14 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950301 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 1995 10:00:08 -0500 (EST) From: Dixon Kenner <dkenner@emr1.emr.ca> Subject: Re: Misc On Tue, 28 Feb 1995, Kelly Minnick wrote: > First off, has anyone had problems getting their packages from UK out > of the hands of Federal Express? Nope. Everything destined here comes via FedEx, regular post, ship, basically anyway except UPS. UPS are terrible when you wish to bring stuff into Canada. To be avoided... ------------------------------[ <- Message 15 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950301 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "DOUG SACKINGER" <DOUG@KIWI.IUPUI.EDU> Date: Tue, 28 Feb 1995 10:39:22 EST Subject: More questions than anwers mtalbot@InterServ.Com (Mark Talbot) writes snip-------------------------------------------------------- Spent 42 days in the garage 9-5 Bought SIII (Red Vinalhaven Rover) $600 Bought SIII (Blue Nantucket Rover) $300 Sold about $1400 in parts from the two. Bought $680 worth of parts from England with shipping. Spent $450 on welding the floor and chassis leg, crossmember and outrigger. snip ------------------- Are parts SIII's really that inexpensive ? I guess I only see nationally advertised vehicles in running condition. Is this pricing characteristic of the northeast ? Any higher for IIa ? Also, additional questions ( and don't you love newbie Q's ?) Are there any hard numbers from vehicle registrations/insurance companies/some industry org. as to the actual numbers of Series LRs still being operated as compared with numbers imported ? Geographical distribution by state/province in North America ? ( Sorry but geography is my bread and butter, I couldn't help but ask) Is it possible to travel to UK, buy a new US - spec D90 there and get any kind of a price break ? Used to be Mercedes and other european makes would offer special programs, I think to avoid import duty as they were personal vehicles. What about used overseas vehicles, I notice some professional importers - is it difficult - can of worms - not even worth it ? If one purchases a non-operational LR at some distance from home, would it be best to trailer, tow, or ship said vehicle? Are all LR clutches hydraulic ? Or just SIII ? I hadn't realised this from the literature. Is this any kind of problem ? Expensive/difficult to fix ? Prone to failure? It leaks, of course ? The Porter book claims problems with 6-cyl aluminum heads failing. >From what I see on this list, 6-cyl can over-stress the transmissions, both IIa and III. Can the 4-cyl possibly pull a 109" and a trailer ?, up a hill ?, at 90kph/55mph ? Oh yes, is there a LR screen saver? I had a colleague download some gifs/jpegs - good for wallpaper and slide shows. Is there anything like a SIIa rovering across terrain, wheels turning, dripping fluids etc.....? Enough questions I guess, thanks for listening and thanks for information. I'm really enjoying this list. Doug Sackinger just a digester in India - no - place ------------------------------[ <- Message 16 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950301 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 1995 11:44:02 -0500 From: maloney@wings.attmail.com (maloney) Subject: Disco US Prices For those interested: Reference - Automobile Invoice Services - New car cost guide, issue 3 (1995) Land Rover Discovery, 1995 Invoice Retail Base Vehicle $26,294 $29350 Rear Air $735 $835 Emissions-CA $100 $100 Black Paint $250 $300 Power Roofs $1386 $1650 Lthr. Seats $1050 $1250 Rr. Clth Jump Seats $735 $875 Auto Trans $966 $1150 Destination Chgs. $625 $625 Draw your own conclusions. Bill maloney@wings.attmail.com ------------------------------[ <- Message 17 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950301 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Walter C. Swain" <wcswain@wrdmail.er.usgs.gov> Subject: Re: Misc Date: Tue, 28 Feb 1995 08:15:34 -0800 (PST) > I have some misc. ramblings here... none > First off, has anyone had problems getting their packages from UK out of the > hands of Federal Express? They have held up my order for over a week 'cause [ truncated by lro-digester (was 6 lines)] > cylinders and repair kits and never had a problem! They must know my motor is > running and I want to finish this restoration! Hi Kelly, I'm not sure why FEDEX isn't delivering your package. Does it have to do with the contents? They don't like delivering brake parts? In my experience, they are real difficult about leaving a package at the door if you are not home, and they don't care at all about the consequences. I had frozen fish shipped from Alaska, we were out when it came, and they drove around with it all day in a hot truck. I had to go the next day and pick it up at their office in Sacto, completely thawed. Bummer. I now have all such packages shipped to my office address. UPS, on the other hand, drops stuff at the door. I will always specify UPS when I have the option (Dixon's experience with their Canadian operations not withstanding). Regards, Walt Swain ------------------------------[ <- Message 18 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950301 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 1995 11:15:25 -0500 (EST) From: Jon Humphrey <jh5r+@andrew.cmu.edu> Subject: Re: Radio's, CB's and C.D in Land Ro Mike L writes; >As to CB.. If you have a real small set, you could mount it somewhere on the >dash tray.. I have a older CB, pretty big one and I mounted it below the >dash, dead center, flush against the sloping part of the bottom of the >dashboard. Doesn't interfere with the gearshift at all. none Mike I mounted my CB on a shelf that I made, which extends from the lip of the top where it mounts to the windscreen. There is enough overhead room in my pickup cab that I was able to mount the CB on a bracket above the shelf. Works and looks pretty slick. I have thoughts of extending the shelf the whole way across the cab so I have a little more room to store things. Later Jon ------------------------------[ <- Message 19 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950301 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 1995 11:39:29 -0500 (EST) From: Jon Humphrey <jh5r+@andrew.cmu.edu> Subject: DBrown David Brown, you may want to call this person. >From: Siewruk@ix.netcom.com (Michael Siewruk) >Subject: Re: WANTED - Used Land Rover [ truncated by lro-digester (was 15 lines)] >CIS: 71333,2735 >Inet: Siewruk@ix.netcom.com ------------------------------[ <- Message 20 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950301 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 95 08:56:13 -0800 From: "TeriAnn Wakeman" <twakeman@apple.com> Subject: Re: Leg Room In message <Pine.3.89.9502272028.A10360-0100000@cloy.oswego.edu> Steven M Denis writes: > The legroom is greater in the 109. while it is true that the 88 and the > 109 are the same from the back of the seatbox forward, none Forgive me but I still don't get it. The seat fits on the seat box. The passanger & middle seat are in fixed posistions on the seat box. The driver's seat is on adjustable rails which stop seat travel at the back of the seat box. Given that the spacing from the back of the seat box forward is the same on a 109 & 88, and the seat fits on the seat box, and the driver sits on the seat, How does more space behind the seat translate into more leg room???? You can remove the seat back stops on a 109 two door, allowing the back of the seat to lean back more giving you a more reclined seating position, but the seat bottom is still only going to go back the same amount on both models and your hips will be in the same location relative to the pedals. the bulkhead/seat > bar(sw models) dimensions are *not* the same...in a 109 2 dr the fuel > filler neck on the tank is in the cab, forward of the bulkhead, in the 88 [ truncated by lro-digester (was 7 lines)] > bulkhead a good 3 inches further back...the seat back rests on extentions > but is *still* further away from the firewall.. The top of the seat back can rest farther back, but the bottom of the back and the bottom cushen is located in the same location on the 88 & 109. There is/ can be more space from the top of the seat back to the steering wheel. This gives more space between your torso and the steering wheel, and windscreen, BUT your hips are still in the same location 88 or 109. another proof of the > added distance is the 88 requires a spacer plate at the bulkhead to > accept the truck cab...on the 109 the rear of the cab sits on the top of > the bulkhead.. I will be happy to admit that there is more car behind the seat box of a 109 than behind the seat box on a 88. but I still do not understand how this translates to more leg space between the pedals and the bottom of the seat back which is in the same location on an 88 & 109. ..I own both...the 109 has more leg room...at 6'4" and 220 > the "little" 88 is just enough smaller to feel like a "clown car"... > the biggest improvement I have found for leg room on a 109 is to fit the > windscreen and roof from a 110..you can then use a higher seat and still > see out the top of the screen... Granted, sitting higher does increase the distance between the hips and the pedals. > steve..... > "HEY! NICE JEEP,MISTER!"..........."Look,Kid,it's a ..Oh never mind..." [ truncated by lro-digester (was 10 lines)] > " "-1964 109 Pickup Erieville,New York USA > " "_1967 109 NADA SW 13061 TeriAnn Wakeman Large format photographers look at the world twakeman@apple.com upside down and backwards ------------------------------[ <- Message 21 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950301 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: C Taylor Sutherland III <taylors@hubcap.clemson.edu> Subject: 2.25L 4-cyl questions. Date: Tue, 28 Feb 1995 12:09:11 -0500 (EST) In regards to the 2.25L 4-cyl they put in III's. What is the performance, availability difference between the early 3 bearing and the later 5 bearing engines? I have heard that the 3 are stronger and the 5 are more powerful, but that's all I have heard. Any comments would be appreciated. Thanks y'all. Taylor ------------------------------[ <- Message 22 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950301 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 1995 09:29:05 -0800 From: jfhess@ucdavis.edu (John Hess) Subject: rover life previously, >Taylor, the best way to learn about rovers is to just get one. I completely agree. Almost 5 years ago I bought a Sunbeam Tiger without ever driving one. At that time, a big deal for me was changing transmission and tranfer case oil on my Jeep (bought new, no problems ever, sold awhile ago). I have now rebuilt the tiger hydraulics and pulled the engine a couple years ago (and put it back in and am still driving the car!!!!!) I just bought a rover without ever driving one and drove it home from maine (it rhd no less). As TeriAnn says, people who buy rovers either sell them very soon or keep them forever. Of course, she also says people who buy rovers are Insane? crazy? (what word did you use?) and that I have answered that question with an exclamation point. Oh well, I'm happy, like Uncle rogers sig file says, "there is pleasure pure in being mad that none but madmen know." Now a question: what is the nature of floor mats that came in 109 sw's? My dormobile has thin (3mm?) rubber mats in the footwell of the rear seat area and down the middle of the rear area between the stove and the closet in the rear. Are these the standard type that came in station wagons? I am interested in putting in something thicker, for sound deadening (please no flames, I don't want absolute silence, but a reduction would be a good thing). Capital Rubber (in sac) has plain rubber in any thickeness I could want as well as other mats, one is 1/8" with diamond plate pattern, one is 3/8" very dense rubber foam, one is like carpet with polyester threads and thick rubber backing. Prices range from $4/sq. foot for the 1/4" rubber to $10 per linear foot (36 inch wide) for the carpet stuff. Any words of wisdom? TIA, John Hess, Land- -Rover Dormobile, Sunbeam Tiger and Mazda GLC owner. jfhess@ucdavis.edu ------------------------------[ <- Message 23 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950301 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 95 09:28:27 -0800 From: "TeriAnn Wakeman" <twakeman@apple.com> Subject: Re: 2.25L 4-cyl questions. In message <199502281709.MAA21529@hubcap.clemson.edu> C Taylor Sutherland III writes: > In regards to the 2.25L 4-cyl they put in III's. What is the > performance, availability difference between the early 3 bearing and [ truncated by lro-digester (was 10 lines)] > Thanks y'all. > Taylor I don't think Land Rovers with 5 bearing engines were officialy imported into the US. I believe they were made after 1974. You do seem to be able to purchase 5 bearing engines to replace your original 3 bearing engine with though. TeriAnn Wakeman Large format photographers look at the world twakeman@apple.com upside down and backwards ------------------------------[ <- Message 24 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950301 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Mugele, Gerry" <Gerry.Mugele@wellsfargo.com> Subject: Range Rover 4.0S Date: Tue, 28 Feb 95 10:49:00 PST JPappa (Roverheadus geekoid salesmutatum): I appreciate getting the timely information on the new products, Thanks. But you didn't mention the 4.6 V-8. Is it going to be available in North America? What's the story? Tell us more. (But please drop the endless barrage of Car Sales drivel and rationalizations. I already know what cars I am interested in buying and how much I'd be willing to spend. I hope I'm not alone in preferring that this forum be free of marketing. Thanks.) Gerry 72 88 ------------------------------[ <- Message 25 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950301 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 1995 13:49:11 -0500 (EST) From: Dixon Kenner <dkenner@emr1.emr.ca> Subject: Re: 2.25L 4-cyl questions. On Tue, 28 Feb 1995, C Taylor Sutherland III wrote: > In regards to the 2.25L 4-cyl they put in III's. What is the > performance, availability difference between the early 3 bearing and > the later 5 bearing engines? Taylor, in a time of rising awareness about pollution and all that shit, the various governments are slowly beginning to get their act together (unfortunately) about emission controls. Part of this process involves them determining what engine should or should not be in the vehicle. Granted the 5 bearing might be less polluting, but they won't believe that & if you happen to have a 5 bearing in your vehicle & they notice this, they will be unhappy with you. Stick to something stock and forget this wee game of mixing and matching parts from across the decades. You want a pre-1968 vehicle (To be able to get it into the USA, assuming you don't buy locally). All you have to do now is decide whether you want a 109 or an 88. Decide that and then go out and buy one. ------------------------------[ <- Message 26 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950301 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Subject: Re: Jeeps in snow Date: Tue, 28 Feb 1995 11:39:06 -0800 From: Mike Fredette <mfredett@ichips.intel.com> Pierce writes; >Jeeps have open differentials, which means only one wheel on each drive axle >really works at a time in slippery conditions. Not only IMHO, is it less than >satisfactory, it can be downright dangerous. and then writes >Range Rovers and Defenders have full-time 4wd systems that put power to the >wheels all the time and adapt the power output to the right wheels for the >conditions. Best system in the world! Fraid I'm going to have to call bullsh-t on this one. ALL Land Rover products have OPEN diffs front and rear. The exception being someone who has put a locking diff such as an ARB or Maxi-Drive unit. The center diff IS lockable in the Disco, early Range Rovers, and all the Series vehicles have a "locked" center. Actually the Series folk don't have an option, if it's in 4wd, there is NO center diff. The later <89 Range Rovers are equipped with a viscous coupling on the center, which acts as a limited slip type device. In short, Rover 4wd systems aren't much different than Jeeps, only one wheel on each axle is getting drive in slippery conditions. And in fact, with the positraction option on the Jeeps, Rover is actually down one on the 4wd feature scorecard. Now as to what accounts for the Jeep Cherokee spinning out, I would venture to guess that it was driver error, and not neccessarily the fault of the Jeep 4wd system. Mike Fredette D90 90 Range Rover ------------------------------[ <- Message 27 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950301 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Mugele, Gerry" <Gerry.Mugele@wellsfargo.com> Subject: Why a L-R Date: Tue, 28 Feb 95 11:43:00 PST Taylor: Given that you've been such a good sport and have taken your ribbing so nicely I'd like to offer a little advice. If you have never had experience with British cars; you may be looking at this purchase inappropriately. I've noted that many (most?) LROs have substantial experience with MGs, Minis, Triumphs, Nortons, Austin Healeys, Jaguars, Cortinas, Sunbeams, etc. I'd wager that most came to Land Rovers from that route rather than from other 4X4s. I think the genesis of LR ownership has less to do with 4X4 experience and more to do with being slightly peculiar in general. I can't imagine a LRO chucking all the mechanical challenges/adventures and buying the mother-in-law's 2 year-old Explorer for $2K to use as the only mode of transport. Backup? Maybe. For the spouse? Certainly. But not at the expense of giving up the L-R. Pragmatic questions about the transmissions (Series III all synchro has never caused me any probs, ditto 2 SIIa's, heck the tranny is probably the least trouble-some piece!) are not ill-advised, they just sorta indicate a thought process very few (if any) of us went through when courting our first L-Rs. Tires, roofs, seats, all of it, L-Rs are sort of a mobile hobby/project car that's never quite done. It's a relationship, not a mode of transportation. My first one changed my life...literally. I had been a sport car fanatic. T-series MGs (lots of 'em) Mini's, Cortinas, etc. But my beloved cars kept suffering in the parking lot Grand Prix when the Battle-Star Pontiac would park nearby and the occupant would open the "pod-bay door". All 7 feet of it. The damn thing would get away from the 96 lb. granny at the helm and cave in my door. Or Bubba in his 3/4 ton pickup (with camper) would employ the tried and true Braille method for parallel parking; crunch....bump...."okay Maw, Ah'm in." Initially the L-R was at least partly self-defense. It stood hood and fenders above the crowd and was impervious to those parking-lot shunts. Even better others mostly stayed away from it. With those concerns behind me, soon I was going on adventures... everywhere... even beyond the edge of the pavement. A few years later, I learned that there are actually places L-Rs cannot go (well two or three anyway)...in the meantime, my other interests began dictating the L-R's itinerary.....I was out seeing birds, traversing old abandoned railroad right-of-ways, looking at trees, landscape and wilderness that I could not have even approached in a sports machine...and I could still take the top off every Easter, play roadster all summer and put it back on just after Labor day. Here's a rework of something I posted a few weeks ago to another curiosity victim: Sorry Taylor...but L-Rs are more of an affliction than a rational choice. You lay out the money cause you find you just can't live without one. It happened to me >25 years ago and clearly this debilitation has effected my economic status and personal sense of well-being. Over the years I've dumped alot(!) of $ into the various beasts I've owned, keeping them well. And I've never felt as secure in the middle of nowhere as I do in my 88". As Dick O'Kane, a writer, said a few decades ago: "When you're in a Land Rover you sort of get the feeling that if they dropped the big one; it would only blister the paint a little." So I guess I'm saying...if you need a logical justification to get one, then you just don't want one enough. I have had a relationship (former lady friend) with an Isuzu, it was an '86 Trooper. Fine vehicle, reliable, quiet, fairly tough, practical, clean lines, comfortable. And it would go 95% of the places I might go (off-road) in the Land Rover...but NO charisma, charm or personality. And when it went away (with the ex-lady friend) it was not a loss. Similarly, (new) wife has a 92 Mitsubishi Montero...leather seats, V6, ABS, sunroof, air-locking rear diff, traction control, etc. and it's a really nice car to drive the 1.2K miles to Moab....but once I'm there I want my L-R. All my L-Rs have been totally stock (this is not a slam to any conversions) cause I never found a need to change anything. And, here's the big one for me: in about a half million miles of LandRoving (in Iceland, Moab, Canada and just about everywhere else west of the Rockies)....I've NEVER had to walk home! Good luck with your choice. Gerry 72 88 ------------------------------[ <- Message 28 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950301 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 1995 14:32:35 -0500 (EST) From: Russell U Wilson <ruwst+@pitt.edu> Subject: Re: 2.25L 4-cyl questions. On Tue, 28 Feb 1995, C Taylor Sutherland III wrote: > I have heard that the 3 are stronger and the 5 are more powerful, but > that's all I have heard. *** Any comments would be appreciated.*** Taylor, as the wise old man once said..."shit or get off the pot!!" You said "any comments would be appreciated"......so here are some thoughts. Don't be such a snivler. Go read some books, educate yourself and make a choice. This is not rocket science. If you want a Rover go buy one... I had no Rover experience what so ever when I drove from Pittsburgh to Norfolk Va. to buy mine and drive it back home. You're at Clemson....the sunny south, the land without roadsalt. The place should be ripe with older Rovers without the dreaded frame cancer. Go look at a few and buy one. Cheers Russ ------------------------------[ <- Message 29 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950301 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 95 11:54:12 PST From: mtalbot@InterServ.Com (Mark Talbot) Subject: Re: SIII Red Stop/Brake lens All, Anyone out there have a spare early SIII Red Stop/Brake lens for sale ????? Mark ------------------------------[ <- Message 30 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950301 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Subject: Re: Misc Date: Tue, 28 Feb 1995 11:59:17 -0800 From: Benjamin Allan Smith <bens@archimedes.vislab.navy.mil> Kelly Minnick wrote: > 2. The folks at Turner say the single Barrel Weber's run too lean. Is this > true? I have a rebuilt Zenith (new throttle bushings!). should I use this? > I could jet the Weber richer if we know what jet to use! When I got my smog check done, I was running a little rich. -Benjamin Smith ---------------- Science Applications International Corporation China Lake Naval Air Warfare Center bens@archimedes.vislab.navy.mil 1972 Land Rover Series III 88 ------------------------------[ <- Message 31 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950301 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Subject: Re: Radio's, CB's and C.D in Land Ro Date: Tue, 28 Feb 1995 11:56:40 -0800 From: Benjamin Allan Smith <bens@archimedes.vislab.navy.mil> Mike Loiodice wrote: > As to CB.. If you have a real small set, you could mount it somewhere on the > dash tray.. I have a older CB, pretty big one and I mounted it below the > dash, dead center, flush against the sloping part of the bottom of the > dashboard. Doesn't interfere with the gearshift at all. This is where I have my CB mounted. I have my stereo mounted right next to it. Both are mounted such that I all the leads are on quick connects and 2 (for the CB) or 3 (for the stereo) screws are all that his needed to remove them. (I take the stereo out when I'm in really dusty conditions). This way, if I am going to be in danger of deep wading, I can easily remove them. I had though of mounting both the stereo and CB up high on the hard top, but I tend to take the top off and still want to use the CB and stereo. I mounted the speakers in the back upper courners in the hardtop where they are out of sight and out of the sun. (Also on quick connnects for ease of removing the top and two bolts each to remove them) -Benjamin Smith ---------------- Science Applications International Corporation China Lake Naval Air Warfare Center bens@archimedes.vislab.navy.mil 1972 Land Rover Series III 88 ------------------------------[ <- Message 32 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950301 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 1995 14:57:24 EST From: CXKS46A@prodigy.com (MR ALEXANDER P GRICE) Subject: LRO, again.... Robin writes: >Is it in the march 95 issue of LRO? *March?!?* Arrgghh! I just got February!!! *----"Jeep may be famous, LAND-ROVER is Legendary"-----* | | | Sandy Grice, Rover Owners' Association of Virginia | | E-Mail: CXKS46A@prodigy.com FAX: 804-622-7056 | | Voice: 804-622-7054 (Days) 804-423-4898 (Evenings) | | 1633 Melrose Pkwy., Norfolk, VA, 23508-1730 USA | *------------------------------------------------------* ------------------------------[ <- Message 33 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950301 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Easton Trevor <TEASTON@DQC2.DOFASCO.CA> Subject: Rust Proofing/elusive 110's Date: Tue, 28 Feb 95 13:49:00 EST The stuff called LPS. LPS 3 heavy duty rust inhibitor is a waxy long term corrosion inhibitor. It is supplied, manufactured by LPS Laboratories Tucker Georgia tel (404) 934-7800. I have used this product for years and been very satisfied and corrosion free. It really hangs on. Unfortunately it also hangs onto any passing dust particles and since it doesn't dry, it keeps doing this until the treated area resembles the Tar Sands. An annual steam clean solves this problem. Great for protecting chips on your steel mobile until you can get to the paint can. (Non silicone so it washes off with good soap) Those elusive Land Rovers Maybe they exist, maybe they don't. The supposed agent has been deluged by LR wanabees and those with opinions on why they should shouldn't be selling them. Information is supposed to be on its way regarding the terms, specifications etc. They are not EPA/DOT appoved and must be exported. Please leave them (the agents) alone unless you seriously want to buy a large consignment. As we all know most members of the list have the odd million to spare for these frivolities. ------------------------------[ <- Message 34 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950301 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Easton Trevor <TEASTON@DQC2.DOFASCO.CA> Subject: Axle retainer straps Date: Tue, 28 Feb 95 13:54:00 EST A good substitute for the gen. part are industrial safety belts. These are a nylon/leather combination. Cut to length and mount with the leather side towards the axle. Per other cautions, they are necessary to limit travel and excessive articulation off road. You can bent important bits without then. The utilitarian nature of our pets means that if a part is there then its fairly certain that it is necessary either functionally or legally. ------------------------------[ <- Message 35 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950301 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: 28 Feb 95 15:10:20 EST From: Pierce Reid <70004.4011@compuserve.com> Subject: Jeep 4wd I've been corrected (rightly so) by a couple of folks on the RR/LR 4wd system. Please disregard my comments... Also, I was not aware the older Range Rovers had a different 4wd system than the new ones. Interesting. Cheers, R. P. Reid ------------------------------[ <- Message 36 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950301 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 1995 12:20:44 -0800 From: mcdpw@pacific.pacific.net (Granville Pool) Subject: Brabyn Notoriety So, John, Not satisfied with the notoriety you have received in AW, you got youself (actually your Rover--you were most modestly absent from the foto) into "Readers' Rigs" in Four-Wheeler. Most appropriate that it was the issue with the test of the new Range Rover. Congrats! Definitely a leg up. In the Range Rover article there was a little sidebar about Ramp Travel Index. Clearly, all the Rovers stand alone at the top. Only the TLC and Is-you-Sue? Trooper had any aspirations to that realm. I was surprised that the Trooper did as well as it did and that the Jeep GC did as poorly as it did. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ [ G.B.Pool(Redwood Vly, CA, USA)Appraiser,R/W Agent,Land-Rover aficionado ] [ e-mail: mcdpw@pacific.pacific.net ** Ph:(707)485-7220 H,(707)463-4265 W ] ------------------------------[ <- Message 37 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950301 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 95 13:18:16 MST From: DEBROWN@SRP.GOV Subject: Discovery... FROM: David Brown Internet: debrown@srp.gov Computer Graphics Specialist * Mapping Services & Engr Graphics PAB219 (602)236-3544 - Pager:6486 External (602)275-2508 #6486 SUBJECT: Discovery... Hank, I own a '94 (currently for sale) Mine is black, automatic, dual sunroofs, rear air cond, leather, 7 seats, rino bar, tint, etc... As you stated, offroad is a given. I've been out with friends, and ended up pulling his trooper out after getting stuck in loose river stones and shallow water. Not really sure what to tell you to watch out for, it's just one fine vehicle! Road worthiness is probably better than the others you mentioned, full time 4wd is "safer" in ice/snow/etc... the Explorer may ride a little better, but would you really want to take either a Blazer or Explorer through anything remotely resembling tough? And, how long do you expect them to last? There really IS no comparison! Check out the latest "Automobile" magazine. I just HAD to get it after scanning the comparisons of several SUV's (Explorer and Blazer included) where they basically said they were NOT AT ALL off-road worthy, and called them "station wagons with hiking boots". The Disco and Range Rover were raved about. Also, 4-Wheeler magazine rated Disco their 4WD of the year. In my opinion, the new Range Rover is going to sweep the competition (if you can call that competition) off their feet... er... "hiking boots!" Also has a price comparison, and I was surprised to find that the Trooper and Montero were MORE than the Disco after you load them all up with options. But then the Disco doesn't offer a Kleenix dispenser. Hmmmmm.... tough choice! ;-) I think your wife will like the Disco after seeing one. The dual temperature controls alone are so radically different and functional that who could turn that down! How many husbands and their wives actually are comfortable at the same temperatures? Add-on's are much cheaper at places like ARB or rovers north or.... The dealer will "rape" you. (Sorry, great guys, and service, but expensive.) I don't think you'll find the steel wheels available. It's just not an option on the US spec. vehicles. Also, the only other SUV that even offers a rear air conditioner is the Chevy Suburban. I like having it, of course, I live in Arizona where summers get over 120 degrees! (So why did I get a black truck with dual sunroofs you ask? It's a long story...) Good luck with your decision, let me know if I can help any further. P.S. I saw part of the "OP Center" movie too. First glimpse of a LR from the inside looking through the windscreen, and I blurted out to my son, "It's a Land Rover!" Fun! #=======# Never doubt that a small group of individuals |__|__|__\___ can change the world... indeed, it's the only | _| | |_ |} thing that ever has. "(_)""""""(_)" -Margaret Mead ------------------------------[ <- Message 38 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950301 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: C Taylor Sutherland III <taylors@hubcap.clemson.edu> Subject: Sins of the net... Date: Tue, 28 Feb 1995 15:26:03 -0500 (EST) For the LAST time! I don't see the sin, that some of you see, in asking questions about land rovers before buying them! Some of you will back me up on this, I think. True, the best way to learn about a car/truck is just to buy it and own it. Yes, I would learn a hell of a lot about it. But what I DON'T want to learn about something after I buy it, is that I don't like it. THEREFORE! I ask questions to make sure I am making the right decision! SHEESH! I ask about all the different modifications because, if I choose, I can get get them. If I didn't ask as many questions as I do, I would have gotten [name deleted] to build me a Series I with the dash of a Defender 90, coil springs, a 3.9L V8, a 20 gal gas tank, air conditioning and a a stereo. CLEARLY, THIS would be stupid and the mark of someone uneducated. Therefore, I say again, I try to educate myself in the best way I know how so as to make an EDUCATED guess as to what to get and what to expect. The only stupid question is the one that was never asked. Taylor Now I have to go break something...maybe my Blazer! Sorry, I just finished some math methods homework and a message I just received about being to whiny was the last straw! OK...I'm calm now. So what is the best way to install coil springs on a Series I? ****KIDDING!!!!!!!!****** ------------------------------[ <- Message 39 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950301 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 1995 15:37:21 -0500 From: chrisste@clark.net (Chris Stevens) Subject: Dash Lites Anybody got any cross reference numbers for those little pesky light bulbs in the dash on the IIA. I'm talking about the cold start, oil pressure, high beam, and alternator lights. Can I pick those up at any auto parts store or must I go to Rovers North? Chris Stevens 1969 SRIIA 88" SW BCG Corporate Communications Towson, Maryland, USA (410) 583-1722 (410) 583-1935 (FAX) chrisste@Clark.net ------------------------------[ <- Message 40 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950301 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Sanna@aol.com Date: Tue, 28 Feb 1995 15:48:09 -0500 Subject: Re: rover life I bought a rubber pickup bed-liner and cut it to fit. This is impossibly tough stuff, made like a corded auto tire. It looks like checkered (or diamond) industrial steel plate, and is about as easy to cut. The original floor mats in a LR were black, rather thin courdorouy textured mats. ------------------------------[ <- Message 41 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950301 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 95 12:53:07 -0800 Subject: re: Jeeps are Crap in the snow.... From: Larry_Soo@mindlink.bc.ca (Larry Soo) Mark Talbot writes: > I have to share this with you all. > [Story about how a Grand Cherokee crashed in the snow while attempting [ truncated by lro-digester (was 6 lines)] > to keep up with Mark's Range Rover. Then the Jeep driver remarked how > his GC wasn't as good in the snow as the RR.] First off, I'll come clean and admit that I own a '91 Wrangler [gasp!]. I've also owned an '88 Cherokee, '84 Toyota 4x4 pickup, and a '78 LandCruiser. I've also driven full-size Blazers and Suburbans extensively. What I've come to learn about driving in the snow (we used to get tons of the stuff in the BC interior where I grew up) is that it's more the driver, not the vehicle which makes a difference. IMHO, any driver than wipes out in the snow while attempting to pass generally doesn't know their vehicle's limits or strengths very well. The GC driver you met probably falls into that category of SUV owners who roost in the ditches whenever snow hits the ground because they think their shiny new toy will allow them to perform superhuman driving feats. In fact, it kinda sounds that way since he was blaming the accident on his vehicle rather than himself. I also subscribe to the Offroad Mailing List and this kind of "my truck is better than your truck" stuff flared-up recently, although in your case, it's more like, "our truck is better than their truck." Anyhow, I know this is a LR list so people should be extolling the virtues of these vehicles, but at least present more tangible arguments (ie: aluminum frames, xfer case gearing, etc). I guess I should also introduce myself (so you folks can flame me on a more intimdate basis <g>): I'm a VB programmer with the Ministry of Health in beautiful Vancouver, BC. I've been four-wheeling since I was a teen-ager although there was a period of almost 10 years when I didn't except for the occasional winter rally (Monte Carlo timing) in my Cherokee and hunting during the fall. Since getting my Wrangler/YJ last year, I've lifted it, put on 31" tires and installed a Lockrite locker in the back. My friends and I (mostly close-to-stock 4x4 pickups) do a lot of exploring in the southwestern corner of BC. Sidenote: During one winter rally, we had a particularly heavy snowfall which caused everyone to have problems maintaining their target time. In fact, the rally became a race. In one section, I overtook a number of competitors, including a new Toyota 4Runner. At the next staging area, he asked me if I had Quadratrac and I said "no, I've got part-time fourwheel drive, just like your 4Runner." This guy thought for sure that my Jeep must've had some technological advantage to pass him as fast as I did in the snow and around the corner. But the fact of the matter is, the more experience you have in the snow, the greater advantage you'll have over someone who has less. Personally, I think Mark Talbot didn't have problems whereas the GC driver did was because he was a smoother driver. The GC driver probably spun out because he gave the V8 too much gas (assuming he had a V8). Now, to be absolutely candid, the quality and perhaps reliability of the Jeep products isn't to my liking but since the demise of SWB LRs and particularly LandCruisers, there's not much choice in the way of short, rugged, convertible 4x4s which is why I bought a YJ. I have subscribed to this list to try to find out just how reliable LRs are, which model would suit my needs, what things to watch out for (the FAQ was helpful here, kudos to the authors), and sources for LR vehicles and parts. Ideally, I'd like to contact someone in the lower mainland who is into fairly severe offroading so I can see how well a LR really performs. As for my "needs", they are: - daily driver (approx 70Km per day). - reasonable power for highway driving (this may be a problem, no?). - parts availability (not too bad around Vancouver). - good performance on climbing rutted, loose-rock hills and crawling over rocks (ala Rubicon). We have something nearby called Clear Creek which is a pretty good trail for that kind of thing. - bullet-proof drivetrain. - easy to work on (LRs are probably the easiest from what I've read). - adequate ground clearance for rock crawling, preferably 9-10" below the diffs. - low gearing for those tricky descents. - 12V system. I'm not planning on buying right away so I'd mostly be lurking here to find out more about LRs. I hope I haven't offended anyone (especially Mark) by dismissing the inherent superiority of a Range Rover over a Grand Cherokee in the snow. It's just that I have a lot of hope for this list because I know that LR owners, by and large, tend to be very knowledgable about their vehicles and that's what I'm looking for. ...lars ------------------------------[ <- Message 42 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950301 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Tom Stevenson <gbfv08@udcf.gla.ac.uk> Subject: Rapped knuckles & broken numberplate Date: Tue, 28 Feb 1995 17:24:43 +0000 (GMT) I'm typing this very slowly, since at the weekend I got slapped on the knuckles by a kicking crank handle; I must be losing my touch since this is the first time its happened in years. The LR in question had a little metal funnel widget over the crankshaft pulley dog to aid insertion of the crank handle. I wonder if this was the reason; I may have inadvertently used a left handed handle by mistake. The other damage was to the numberplate on the 90. It is stuck on to the bumper, but projects below it by about 1cm, and now has a couple of chunks missing after a close encounter with a large rock. I had been planning to move it (for weeks) to prevent this from happening. Initially I thought of sticking it on a little backplate on top of the bumper a la SIII. However, someone mentioned to me the other day that the 2.5 Turbo-diesel is not happy when airflow past the radiator is resricted by numberplates, big spotlights etc. Any thoughts? Cheers! -- Tom Stevenson: gbfv08@udcf.gla.ac.uk University Marine Biological Station, Isle of Cumbrae, Scotland Tel:(0475) 530581 Fax:(0475) 530601 ------------------------------[ <- Message 43 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950301 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 95 13:54:22 -0800 From: "TeriAnn Wakeman" <twakeman@apple.com> Subject: Re: Sins of the net... In message <199502282026.PAA07283@hubcap.clemson.edu> C Taylor Sutherland III writes: > the different modifications because, if I choose, I can get get them. > If I didn't ask as many questions as I do, I would have gotten [name [ truncated by lro-digester (was 6 lines)] > stereo. CLEARLY, THIS would be stupid and the mark of someone > uneducated. Except for the air conditioning ( I live in a fog belt on the coast), this sounds like it might be a fun rig. A series I with updated suspension & a V8 lighter than the original engine. Might just be a kick at that. Hmm I guess that makes me uneducated. Oh well TeriAnn Wakeman Large format photographers look at the world twakeman@apple.com upside down and backwards ------------------------------[ <- Message 44 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950301 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 1995 17:04:54 EST From: CXKS46A@prodigy.com (MR ALEXANDER P GRICE) Subject: Alternators I posed this question several months ago, but didn't get any response....Has anyone found a direct, drop-in replacement for the Lucas family of alternators? I'm currently running with the 18-ACR (out of a Jag) that puts out about 45 amps...but (as Tim Allen puts it) I want MORE POWER. I found a Mitsubishi 90 amp alternator that *almost* worked...it fits Nissan fork lifts and the bottom bolts were perfect - it was even smaller than the Lucas unit. The lobe for the belt tensioner arm was about 30 degrees out of place, though. Rats. Talked to Robert Davis just a few minutes ago...he continues to "tweak" his '64 right hand drive Mercruiser/Rover pickup. Last weekend, he swapped out the 4.7 diffs for 3.9 Range Rover diffs. And he worked out the interference problem with the front prop shaft with a 1 1/4" unit (and yes, it does have sliding splines). *----"Jeep may be famous, LAND-ROVER is Legendary"-----* | | | Sandy Grice, Rover Owners' Association of Virginia | | E-Mail: CXKS46A@prodigy.com FAX: 804-622-7056 | | Voice: 804-622-7054 (Days) 804-423-4898 (Evenings) | | 1633 Melrose Pkwy., Norfolk, VA, 23508-1730 USA | *------------------------------------------------------* ------------------------------[ <- Message 45 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950301 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Craig Murray <craigp@ocs.cpsg.com.au> Subject: Re: Axle Straps Date: Wed, 1 Mar 95 9:25:38 EDT > ... snip ... > >... snip ... as they restrict suspension travel, as for the talk of bent prop [ truncated by lro-digester (was 27 lines)] > RR with similiar straps for precisely the reasons mentioned... > Stefan > <Stefan R. Jacob, 100043.2400@CompuServe.com> Every one I talk to in the Land Rover club of Victoria, says that if you have axle straps to take them off, as they restrict axle travel. They say that the spring will run out of travel, before you start putting stress on the shock absorber, that is if you have the right sort of shock absorbers, ie. 110 shocks on the back of 109"s. As for the Range Rover, the shock absorber is meant to be the restricting factor with suspension travel, so that the springs don't pop out. As for my sister, she doesn't have axle straps, and that is the reason for her 88"s enourmous amount of suspension travel, I have a photo of her 88 parked in a washout, with the back wheel, full up in the guard, and the front wheel totally out of the guard, and it has 7.50 16"s on!! -- ============================================================================== Craig Murray | 1955 Series 1 86" LROC of Victoria Australia | 2.25 diesel LROC of Gippsland Victoria Australia | No Hill to Steep! email: craigp@ocs.cpsg.com.au | No Ditch to Deep! ------------------------------[ <- Message 46 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950301 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 95 14:40:32 -0800 Subject: Newbie questions - was Jeeps are crap in snow From: Larry_Soo@mindlink.bc.ca (Larry Soo) I'm posting the reply to an e-mail I received from Dixon. Since it seemed fairly innocuous, I hope he doesn't mind some of the inclusions from his original mail. Thanks for the reply, Dixon. Dixon Kenner writes: > I am also the editor of > the monthly Ottawa Valley Land Rovers newsletter, one of the two [ truncated by lro-digester (was 6 lines)] > decade. OVLR is the largest Land Rover club in Canada and has > an international membership. What's the membership cost and what do I get by being a member? Is there something there which isn't available via the LRO list? > There are a cuple of OVLR members out that way, but they tend to > be far and few between. > Land Rover clubs in Canada that have been around for more than a I met a guy two weeks ago who has a Lightweight LR. Maybe I can go offroading with him sometime. Even though you have few members out here, I do see quite a few LRs running around Vancouver. I guess they like to stick close to their parts supply because there's hardly any in the smaller towns. Perhaps its just the law of averages, hmm? There were two regularly maintained 88s in Princeton, where I grew up. As far as I know, one of the owners died and the other is still alive. I wanted to buy the 88 from the deceased's family but it was gone by the time I found out. > Oh yeah, thanks for the complement. I wrote the FAQ. Many parts > are from the OVLR newsletter that have been published over the > years. > decade. OVLR is the largest Land Rover club in Canada and has How often do you publish the newsletter? > The 2.25l has reasonable power, the top end just isn't there. An > overdrive will solve some of this problem. > years. I'm talking about cruising around 110Km. Is that unreasonable? If it is, I may end up considering a LandCruiser with a V8 swap. If I lived in Princeton, a 4-banger would be ok but down here, there's always an hour or more of highway driving before getting to the trailhead. And on weekends, we usually drive around 3 hours on the highway each way. This includes going up & down the mountain passes. Am I right in guessing that the weight of an 88 is around 3500lbs? > We tend to get a lot of stuff directly from England. Cost is the > main reason. Far cheaper over there... > years. I assumed the freight would be a real killer. So instead of buying from a local supplier, most people just phone England? Wow. Any clues on how to get an LR shipped to Canada? What kind of regulatory hoops need to be jumped? For what I want, which LR would you suggest? I'm not familiar with the 90s and Countys. > > - bullet-proof drivetrain. > Don't put a chevy 6 in, or boost the power by changing the [ truncated by lro-digester (was 9 lines)] > may break, but crystalisation within them from age is also a > problem. I've noticed this. LR owners I've talked to often mention breaking half-shafts. I wasn't sure whether to attribute this to age or inherent weakness. > > - adequate ground clearance for rock crawling, preferably 9-10" > > below the diffs. > You should have 9.5" right now with a LR with good springs. > decade. OVLR is the largest Land Rover club in Canada and has none With what size tires? BTW, what's the final gear reduction of a Series IIa or III in first-low? BTW, with regards to my previous soap-box speech about the Grand Cherokee in the snow story, I realized that my subsequent questions about LandRover "performance" seemed hypocrytical. By asking about performance on hills, I was, in my own obtuse and convoluted way, wondering how well the suspension allows the wheels to follow the terrain. Hmm...the more I write, the more it seems my foot goes deeper and deeper. Time to lurk. ...lars ------------------------------[ <- Message 47 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950301 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Craig Murray <craigp@ocs.cpsg.com.au> Subject: Re: 2.25L 4-cyl questions. Date: Wed, 1 Mar 95 9:43:07 EDT > In regards to the 2.25L 4-cyl they put in III's. What is the > performance, availability difference between the early 3 bearing and [ truncated by lro-digester (was 12 lines)] > Thanks y'all. > Taylor I believe that there is no disernable difference in power, but the 5 bearing motors are stronger. I'm not sure when the 5 bearing motors came out, but I think it was in the early 80's, maybe 83, when they released the 110". -- ============================================================================== Craig Murray | Systems Administrator | Ambition is a poor excuse for not having CP Software | the sense to be lazy. 1st Floor | 493 St Kilda Road | -- Charlie McCarthy Melbourne VIC 3004 | mail: craigp@ocs.cpsg.com.au | Note: I do not take any responcibility for spelling mistakes. flames > /dev/null ------------------------------[ <- Message 48 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950301 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 1995 17:57:06 -0500 (EST) From: Steven M Denis <denis@oswego.Oswego.EDU> Subject: Re: Leg Room OK, OK!! I'll go measure the 109 sw which is right outside then I'll go measure the 88's.... ..the 109 PU is 75 miles away so we can forget that one...I'll delay this message and you can whistle while I'm gone.................................................. ................................................ (sounds of a Land Rover driving off in the rain.....squeal of brakes, he's back..) The 109 measures approx. 30 inches from the bottom of the seatback to the bottom edge of the dash....and the 88 measures .....wot the 'ell ?!?!?! 30 inches!!!!!! I sit in the 88..Ummmph..tight fit...sit in the 109.. spacious....now wait .....w/o dimensioning this to death..(it's 5 miles each way to the 88's) I'll defer to lady...the *LEG* room of the two models is the same....*BUT*!!!I'm *Jammed* in the 88 with my knees up and the steering wheel in my gut....It *has* to be the backrest angle..... I *cannot* drive the 88 without my trick knee acting up...the 109 is uncomfortable but not so bad.....hmmmmmmmm......*I'LL* get to the bottom of this yet!.... volumetrically challenged rover owner steve..... "HEY! NICE JEEP,MISTER!"..........."Look,Kid,it's a ..Oh never mind..." "NOTAJEEP"-1967 109 Station Wagon Steven M. Denis " "-1957 107 Station Wagon PO Box 61 " "-1964 109 Pickup Erieville,New York USA " "_1967 109 NADA SW 13061 ------------------------------[ <- Message 49 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950301 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Subject: Re: Alternators Date: Tue, 28 Feb 1995 15:15:32 -0800 From: Mike Fredette <mfredett@ichips.intel.com> Sandy asks: >I posed this question several months ago, but didn't get any >response....Has anyone found a direct, drop-in replacement for the Lucas >family of alternators? Doug Shipman is a big fan of using the Delco 64 amp internally regulated alternators pt number 7127 or some such. It's a VERY tight fit but it does fit. The mounting holes line up, as does the pully. I think the adjuster arm needs a bit of massaging, but no big deal. I've seen these installations Doug does on some of his restorations and they really work well. If you want more details give him a call at 503 252 5566. Rgds Mike Fredette Portland, Orygun ------------------------------[ <- Message 50 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950301 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 1995 17:29:41 -0600 (CST) From: David John Place <umplace@cc.UManitoba.CA> Subject: Re: rover life I have found that the rubber mats used on loading docks is great for Land Rovers. It is about 1/2" thick and therefore a good sound deadener. It is also very durable and can be taken out and washed when dirty. It does not roll up mind you so when you take it out, it stays flat for cleaning. Because it is so heavy, it makes a good mat if you get stuck. Dave VE4PN ------------------------------[ <- Message 51 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950301 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Russell G. Dushin" <dushinrg@pr.cyanamid.com> Subject: RRpurchases Date: Tue, 28 Feb 95 18:40:48 EST To those requesting RR purchase tips- Stephan Jacob (I think), fellow lrolister, recently submitted a report that appeared in ROAV's (or maybe OVLR's) newsletter a few months back. It detailed the "what to look for and what to look out fors" of RR purchasing. Perhaps he could send that on to the list (I don't recall ever seeing it except in the newsletter <hint: join ROAV and OVLR, and any other LR associated group you care to>). I looked back into some files I once saved when contemplating a RR purchase (I regained my senses). Unfortunately, there is not a complete discussion of the merits of '89 over '88 specifically. If there were, I'd of sent it on. rd/nige ------------------------------[ <- Message 52 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950301 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 1995 17:49:42 -0600 (CST) From: David John Place <umplace@cc.UManitoba.CA> Subject: Re: Leg Room I think if you measure the dividing wall from the dash, the 109 is about 6" farther back and therefore the seat angle is steeper. This gives the impression that the cab is bigger. The truck top needs a 6" spacer on the 88 to compensate for this difference. The new Defender solved this by cutting out the centre wall and putting the roll bar back there. We could do the same thing I think. Dave VE4PN ------------------------------[ <- Message 53 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950301 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Russell G. Dushin" <dushinrg@pr.cyanamid.com> Subject: Re: Click and Clack on the Disco Date: Tue, 28 Feb 95 18:19:49 EST > The local Public Radio station aired a Click and Clack tape this morning > with a call from Mary in Vermont trying to decide between a Grand Cherokee [ truncated by lro-digester (was 12 lines)] > Ultimately they did note that the Discovery actually has a very special > character, as opposed to the bland personality of the Jeep (same as Ford > Explorer, etc) and encouraged her to get the Discovery. CandC have come a long way. About a year ago, they told some poor woman to buy a Toyota for her trip across Africa, citing the lack of available parts of older Land Rovers (her first choice). I wonder how far she got. > Then came the zinger; while on the subject of getting a Land Rover > serviced or repaired, one of them said it didn't matter, they fix them on > the Internet! Are these guys wired? Probably just have good information > sources, but it was fun. I suspect one of us got on their case bigtime, then clued them in. rd/nigel ------------------------------[ <- Message 54 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950301 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Russell G. Dushin" <dushinrg@pr.cyanamid.com> Subject: Re: Cheap 110s? Date: Tue, 28 Feb 95 19:45:11 EST > 3)the "CURRENTLY IN NORTH AMERICA" bunch that claimed to have "ALL VEHICLES ARE > BUILT TO MILITARY SPECIFICATIONS WITH CALIFORNIA EPA AND DOT APPROVAL, which As Robin (and others) have pointed out before, this statement DOES NOT mean these vehicles are DOT/EPA approved! Read it carefully, in legaleze....it says they are built to SPECS that are EPA and DOT approved. Buyer beware, rd/nigel ------------------------------[ <- Message 55 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950301 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Russell G. Dushin" <dushinrg@pr.cyanamid.com> Subject: Re: Axle Straps Date: Tue, 28 Feb 95 19:55:43 EST > Hi all, > All that I have been told about axle straps is, that if you are [ truncated by lro-digester (was 7 lines)] > shafts, I have never seen one, and my sisters 88" has more suspension > travel than a 110" through extended shakels and very tired leaf springs! And I've been told the opposite.....remove them and in serious off road situations you increase the risk of a rollover. Their purpose is to limit body roll (by keeping the axles at some maximum distance from the frame). In the "resting state", the straps should hand just below the axle. You only limit your downward travel, and the springs themselves will probably stop downward travel as soon or sooner than your straps will. but who knows......my straps are off right now (but I've a new set to install before the Bday party). oops, did I say that? rd/nigel ------------------------------[ <- Message 56 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950301 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Craig Murray <craigp@ocs.cpsg.com.au> Subject: Re: Axle Straps Date: Wed, 1 Mar 95 11:56:25 EDT > > Hi all, > > All that I have been told about axle straps is, that if you are [ truncated by lro-digester (was 27 lines)] > oops, did I say that? > rd/nigel The axle straps might be there to prevent body roll on a side slope, but most people will stop before they get anywhere near rolling, and remember that you have to get the thing onto about 45 degrees before it will roll any way, which is better than all of the other four wheel drives that I can think of, except the hummer, but I don't know about that, as I don't think you can get them out here. -- ============================================================================== Craig Murray | 1955 Series 1 86" LROC of Victoria Australia | 2.25 diesel LROC of Gippsland Victoria Australia | No Hill to Steep! email: craigp@ocs.cpsg.com.au | No Ditch to Deep! ------------------------------[ <- Message 57 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950301 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 1995 20:52:23 -0500 (EST) From: Steven M Denis <denis@oswego.Oswego.EDU> Subject: Re: Leg Room The 110 sw has no divider bar and the seats are moved back quite a bit..there seems to be no reason why I can't push the seats back in the 109 (no extra reinforcing in the 110) if I need the leg room.(I do..) cutting the bulkhead in an 88 looks to be a *PROJECT*.....BYW the 90's I was in (euro-spec) had plenty of leg room...much of the wheelbase seems to be in the rear tub and the bulhead *appears* to be like the 109 2 dr..IE: back further......any input from the UK???? steve..... and don't measure in metric..we Bazootieheads can't convert it!!!! 2.54...... "HEY! NICE JEEP,MISTER!"..........."Look,Kid,it's a ..Oh never mind..." "NOTAJEEP"-1967 109 Station Wagon Steven M. Denis " "-1957 107 Station Wagon PO Box 61 " "-1964 109 Pickup Erieville,New York USA " "_1967 109 NADA SW 13061 ------------------------------[ <- Message 58 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950301 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: dwebb@waite.adelaide.edu.au (Daryl Webb) Subject: Re:3.9i series I Date: Wed, 1 Mar 1995 13:56:08 +1030 (CST) Taylor writes: > If I didn't ask as many questions as I do, I would have gotten [name > deleted] to build me a Series I with the dash of a Defender 90, coil > springs, a 3.9L V8, a 20 gal gas tank, air conditioning and a a > stereo. Ohh Yeh get me one too. When is the next RTV trial, let me at em. 80", 3.9V8 auto, discs, drool drool slobber pant lust :-) > CLEARLY, THIS would be stupid and the mark of someone uneducated. Why ?? Provided the g/box was from the same source as the 3.9i I would suggest that this combination gives the best of many worlds. Look in LRO magazine and see how many similar set ups are trialled. > The only stupid question is the one that was never asked. True. But with Land-Rovers no one answer is correct, it all has to be weighed up by the questioner. Horses for courses so to speak. cheers -- Daryl Webb (dwebb@waite.adelaide.edu.au) ------------------------------[ <- Message 59 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950301 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 95 19:27:39 PST From: brabyn@skivs.ski.org (John Brabyn) Subject: Re: Brabyn Notoriety Many thanks Granville -- I haven't seen it yet, and am a bit surprised they used it!! All you LRO folks should write in too so we can get the point across to the magazines that one brand of 4X4 doesn't need all those lifts and decorative bolt-ons to get down the trail! Cheers John Brabyn 89RR ------------------------------[ <- Message 60 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950301 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: taylors@hubcap.clemson.edu (C. Taylor Sutherland, III) Subject: Correction Date: Tue, 28 Feb 95 22:33:42 To all the people with Series I's outfitted like I said would be stupid... You know what I mean. I didn't mean to be specific. My point may have been lost when I started screaming. :) Taylor -- One Ring to rule them all, One Ring to find them, One Ring to bring them all and in the darkness bind them In the Land of Mordor, where the Shadows lie. <-> C. Taylor Sutherland, III <-> <-> IRC Nick: NIV <-> taylors@hubcap.clemson.edu <-> ------------------------------[ <- Message 61 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950301 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 95 19:39:39 PST From: brabyn@skivs.ski.org (John Brabyn) Subject: Re: Jeeps in snow That's right Steve -- and I believe there is a Jeep system called Quadratrac that is similar to the current RR one with a viscous diff lock & full time 4wd; however the vast majority of Jeeps use the part time Command Trac or Selectrac (the latter has a center differential and can be used on pavement, but Command Trac doesn't and can't). Most likely the Jeep in the story (which I think is a great story anyway) was still in 2WD?? If it was in 4WD I expect the effects would be different according to which of the Jeep options for 4WD it had. Cheers John Brabyn 89RR ------------------------------[ <- Message 62 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950301 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 1995 19:44:01 -0800 From: jjbpears@ix.netcom.com (Jeremy Bartlett) Subject: UK LR training spots Hullo to All! I'm new to the group, so I'll provide a quick summary. I drive a '94 Defender 90 and have been for almost a year having decided to buy one more or less as soon as they became available over here (Berkeley, California)[I guess I just didn't have a respectable amount of debt at the time :)]. I don't have a vast knowledge of Land Rovers (yet) but have always longed to own one; which is the most fundamental reason after all! I seem to have vague memories of being bitten by the bug around the age of 7 (Lewis Leakey/National Geographic films?). However, despite a few close calls and the occasional turn behind the wheel of a SIII and D110, I never quite got my hand on a Series version. But destiny being what it is I have now done my part (or the banks?)to contribute to the US foreign trade imbalance and undertaken a hopefully long term (20yr+?) plan of LR ownership. [Of course, being a joint UK/Canadian citizen it does seem only right that I should be repatriating some US funds.] But enough piffle. I work as a geologist so I do a bit of four wheeling both professionally and recreationally; the D90 seems a rather excellent vehicle in addition to being a lot more fun than the pickups I was used to [even on the freeway with tire and softop noise]. Which brings me to my first question for anyone out there who can assist: I'm planning a trip to the UK in October for a few weeks, and I'm considering visiting one of the off road centres for some LR/4x4 instruction. I have a large number of addresses and tel. numbers (mostly from the recent Land Rover World), but was wondering if anyone on the other side of the puddle could provide recommendations on sites before I start sifting through the long distance telephone calls. I'd be looking for one that provides vehicles since I won't have one with me (BritRail and canal boats don't you know). Ideally they'd have training available for myself and companion at the novice level in a D90 (Disco or Series as 2nd choice) preferably with winching instruction available and be reasonably accessible by train and bus (coach?). While I'm on it does anyone know what one can expect to pay for a day's (or 2??) training and are there limitations placed on yanks (beware the land of the left hand lawyer)? [I always thought the UK "solicitor" had more appropriate connotations.] If you like please feel free to E-mail me direct. Cheers, Jeremy Bartlett Berkeley, CA jjbpears@ix.netcom.com "Four Wheels Good - Two Wheels Bad" ------------------------------[ <- Message 63 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950301 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: LANDROVER@delphi.com Date: Tue, 28 Feb 1995 23:10:48 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: Radio's, CB's and C.D in Land Ro Jon Humphrey sez... > Mike L writes; > >As to CB.. If you have a real small set, you could mount it somewhere on none ............ And Jon replies > Mike I mounted my CB on a shelf that I made, which extends from the lip > of the top where it mounts to the windscreen. There is enough overhead Jon... Mark Talbot has a SerIII and I presume he has the full interior. There is a finishing piece that covers the joint between the windshield and roof. I suppose if you were very clever, you could mound a very small radio and/or CB up there.. Can't do what you did because of the headliner. I have seen a real nice setup where the center seat was replaced with a cubby box which held a radio and space for cassettes, etc. Cheers Mike ------------------------------[ <- Message 64 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950301 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: LANDROVER@delphi.com Date: Tue, 28 Feb 1995 23:11:06 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: Rapped knuckles & broken numberplate Tom Stevenson... knuckle rapper! > I'm typing this very slowly, since at the weekend I got slapped on the > knuckles by a kicking crank handle; I must be losing my touch since this [ truncated by lro-digester (was 6 lines)] > the crank handle. I wonder if this was the reason; I may have > inadvertently used a left handed handle by mistake. Ouch! Back when I was a lad on the farm, more years ago than I care to think about, we had a big Oliver tractor. If it had an electric starter, I don't remember, since the only way to start it was by cranking it. The crank was about the size of the Rover crank but permanently mounted and about waist high. Turning the bugger over was no easy task, especially for a skinny teen-ager. I distinctly remember one fine day when I happened to be in the wrong place when it kicked back... caught me square in the chest and threw me back 6 or 8 feet! Knocked the wind right out of me.. Had a *lot* more respect for the beast after that! Cheers Mike ------------------------------[ <- Message 65 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950301 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: rmodica@east.pima.edu Date: Tue, 28 Feb 1995 21:16:38 MST Subject: March LRO already? Just caught up on the last few days of the Digest, and I'm beginning to think there are two different publications called LRO. Robin writes that he already got his March LRO. I just got my Feb LRO on 2/27. Does yours come via something called "TELESORT, Inc" out of NY or direct from England? Why should there be a month's difference in delivery? Sandy-- What is the "breakfast" on a 109? I missed the "Op Center" broadcast. Dixon-- What is "IRC", or is this another Series Three Taylor put on? Lastly - Regarding the comments on somebody standing in front of a British flag in the Feb LRO article on the ROVA getogether. I've looked through the entire issue and the only flag I see is on page 107 and it's on top of a building. Are we getting the same magazine? Rob Modica 1951 SI 80" Hardtop 16136629 Tucson AZ 1960 SII 109 Safari SW 164000620 1994 Disco 5spd formerly owned 1967 SIIA 88" 24420297B Anyone seen it? ------------------------------[ <- Message 66 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950301 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Subject: Re: March LRO already? Date: Tue, 28 Feb 1995 20:34:37 -0800 From: Benjamin Allan Smith <bens@archimedes.vislab.navy.mil> Rob Modica wrote: > Dixon-- What is "IRC", or is this another Series Three Taylor put on? Internet Relay Chat. Its a real time interactive talk session via computer. think of it as a typed N party line where N can be very large (or as small as 2) > Lastly - Regarding the comments on somebody standing in front of a > British flag in the Feb LRO article on the ROVA getogether. I've looked > through the entire issue and the only flag I see is on page 107 and it's on > top of a building. Are we getting the same magazine? In the ROVA article: ( on page 187(?) ) If you look at the picture of the NATO 109 Pickup crossing a small stream/puddle in the upper right hand corner of the photo is a blue SIII. If you look closely there is a roof rack on the SIII and a CB antenna sticking up from the SIII's left rear corner. At the top of this antenna is a red/blue/white drooping flag which is a Union Jack. But you'd only know that if you knew what you were looking at. (the SIII is mine btw) -Benjamin Smith ---------------- Science Applications International Corporation China Lake Naval Air Warfare Center bens@archimedes.vislab.navy.mil 1972 Land Rover Series III 88 ------------------------------[ <- Message 67 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950301 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 01 Mar 1995 14:27:39 +1000 From: ra.walker@qut.edu.au (Rodney Walker) Subject: HELP PLEASE - RIVNUTS !!!! Can someone out there please help me locate some RIVNUTS! These are the correct fastener that is used to mount a capstan winch to an early landrover. They are similar in operation to a NUTSERT, but they have a hex head that protrudes outside of the job so that they can be put in without special tools. Does anyone have any idea what I'm on about? Does anyone know if Craddocks stocks them?? Best regards Rod Walker ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Rodney A. Walker 44 Ford GPW Space Centre for Satellite Navigation 44 Willys MB Queensland University of Technology 88 Cherokee George St, Brisbane 90 Wrangler 4000, Queensland, Australia 85 CJ7, 85 J10 voice +61-7-8705187 44 GPA, 44 Dodge Truck fax +61-7-8641517 79 Cherokee Cheif 56 CJ3B 55 Series 1 Land Rover 53 Series 1 Land Rover ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------[ <- Message 68 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950301 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: dwebb@waite.adelaide.edu.au (Daryl Webb) Subject: Guilt trip. Date: Wed, 1 Mar 1995 15:21:51 +1030 (CST) Oh The guilt! Like some others I've "picked" on Taylor a bit, Hey he seems like a nice enough guy, he wants the knowledge to make an informed decision, and in many ways is to be congratulated for that. So why pick on him???? Maybe because I(we) feel that purchase of a Land-Rover, particularly older ones is not a decision that can be rationalised a priori. To me (and I suspect many others of "us") it is more an emotional thing which we later (attempt to) rationalise. How many of us bought a Land-Rover because we *wanted a Land-Rover*, regardless of price/condition/comfort, it just had to be a Land-Rover didnt it ? I bought my first Land-rover because i couldnt afford one of the Rice rockets, lots of people said I was crazy (maybe they were right). It never really occured to me at the time that the mere fact I could buy a 20 odd year old Land-Rover at all must say something about the Marque. Now I wouldnt consider a non Land-Rover, it is simply no longer an option. (Ok I 'fess maybe a 'Mog) It is truely commendable on Taylors part that he wants to go in with his eyes open. I wonder if I would have bought that '67 109 if I had know "the Dark side"? However I fear the more information needed to rationalise a Land-Rover purchase the less likely it is that the new owner will be happy with his new family member. Who was it that said, " Land-Rover are like women/men, You cant live with them and you cant just leave them by the side of the road" Well I've ranted enough and wasted enough bandwidth again. Comments anyone? -- Daryl (dwebb@waite.adelaide.edu.au) ------------------------------[ <- Message 69 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950301 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Barry Dudley" <DUDLEY@gate2.cc.unp.ac.za> Date: Tue, 28 Feb 95 23:47:31 +200 Subject: UUENCODED file: SUM-V.CP part 1 of 1 section 1 of uuencode of file SUM-V.CP begin 644 SUM-V.CP M_U=00Q0&```!"@`!`````/O_!0`R`,T````&`!````!"````#`!:````4@`` M``D``@```*P````'`!\```"N````$!%\`'@````!`````````$5P<V]N($1& M6"TX,#`P``````````````````````````````!%4$1&6#4P,"Y04E,`VP%X M`!0>#!>,"@````010,D`A\\!``$````````````8<!U1%U@"0`+74F]M86X@ M,3!C<&D`4F]M86X@,3!C<&D@271A;&EC`/O_!0`R`.(#```#``<!``#_```` M`0&0````!@(```(!I@```)8"```#`:8````\`P``TQ$(`%5354L(`!'3T`OW M`)`SV"<!```````````````````````````````````````````````````` M````D#/8)P$(4W1A;F1A<F0````````````````````````````````````` M````````T#;")@$````````````````````````````````````````````` M``````````#0-L(F`0!3=&%N9&%R9```````````15!$1E@U,#`N4%)3`-L! M>``4'@P7C`H``````M>P!+`$L`2P!`````````````````````````$````` M`````````````````````````/<`"]`T```````````````````````````! M;W)D:6YA<GD@<VEZ92!O;FQY("AW:71H(#%S="!L970@8V%P*0`````````` M``````````````$O`)DX"0!.'P``UP`%``,%``#7V`$7`(,````````````` M````````82X7``'8P@!8`@@'"`<5`,+7`04``P4``=<R```````````````` M```````````!0T%0251!3%,[($E404Q)0U,````````````````````````` M``````````````````````````)"`&JY#`!=F@``U`$,```&D0!8````#``! MU-<`!0`!!0``U]@!%P"!`````````````````````$$N%P`!V,,(P\(`6`(( M!P@'%0#"Q`C$UP$%``$%``'7,0```````````````````````````4-!4$E4 M04Q3.R!"3TQ$```````````````````````````````````````````````` M```````#0@#IN@P`W!D``-0!#```!I$`6`````P``=37``4```4``-?8`1<` M@`````````````````````!)+A<``=C##,/"`%@""`<(!Q4`PL0,Q-<!!0`` M!0`!U_O_!0`R```````$`:8````4!```#P!8`0``N@0```@``@```!(&```` M````````````,P```````````````````````````6]R9&EN87)Y('-I>F4@ M5TE42"`Q4U0@3$545$52($-!4$E404P[(&)O;&0````````````````$0@#A M,@P`X!H``-0!#```!I$`6`````P``=37``4``@4``-?8`1<`@@`````````` M```````````Q+A<``=C"`%@""`<(!Q4`PL,,P\0,Q-<!!0`"!0`!UP8'__^1 M`#<`>`!X`'@`>``,`````,;5P@%X`/0:7!(:"0```!`@0(X`E-?U`0L`6`)` M_O[^_O[___\!_________O__________________________1`?__Y,`-0!X M`'@`>`!X``P`#```,0C"`7@`]!HJ$F8(.0<`$"!HC@`"SO4!"P!8`DC^_O[^ M_O_____________^________________________________;V5S($Y/5"!E M<75A=&4@=&\@5')E860@86YY=VAE<F4@;W1H97)S#6AA=F4@8F5E;BP@=VET M:"#!`!`.$`X>`,%I;7!U;FET>2X*5$E-12!43_____]23CH@,3`@;6EN=71E M<RX*0T]35#H@("!!(&)I="!O9B!A(&QE8W1U<F4L(&%N9"!S;VUE(&5G;RX@ M"@I,15-33TXZP0!@"6`)%`#!("!&;VQD``###,/##L/!X.T.81,@`,%614A) M0TQ%(%!215!%4D%424].Q`S$Q`[$@PH*0T].5$5.5%,@4$%'10K7`@H`!`0$ M!`0$"@`"UPK"`5@""`<(!P\`PL&`L`2P!`H`P4DNPPS#P@````@'"`</`,)) M3E123T150U1)3T[$#,3&NA\(!\;!<*H@$B)%`,$@(#.#"@K"`5@""`<(!P\` MPL&`L`2P!`H`P4E)+L,,P\(````(!P@'#P#"0T].5%))0E543U)3Q`S$QKH? M"`?&P7"J(!(B10#!("`S@PH*P@%8`@@'"`</`,+!@+`$L`0*`,%)24DNPPS# MP@````@'"`</`,)'14Y%4D%,(#18-"!!4U!%0U13Q`S$QKH?"`?&P7"J(!(B M10#!("`T@PK4`0P```:3`#<`"`<,``'4P@%8`@@'"`</`,+"`%@"8`E@"10` MPL&`"`<(!P\`P4$NPPC#P@```&`)8`D4`,)1.B!(;W<@9&\@22!L96%R;B!T M;R!D<FEV92!O9F9R;V%D/\0(Q,:Z'V`)QL%PJB`2(D4`P2`@-(,*U`$,```& MDP`W`-('#``!U,(!6`((!P@'#P#"P@!8`F`)8`D4`,+!@`@'"`</`,%"+L,( MP\(```!@"6`)%`#"9G)E92!W:&5E;"!H=6)SQ`C$QKH?8`G&P7"J(!(B10#! M("`U@PK4`0P```:3`#<`G`@,``'4P@%8`@@'"`</`,+"`%@"8`E@"10`PL&` M"`<(!P\`P4,NPPC#P@```&`)8`D4`,)#;VUP87)I<V]N(&]F(&1I97-E;"!A M;F0@9V%S;VQI;F4@96YG:6YE<R!F;W(-U`$,```&DP`W`&8)#``!U'5S92!I M;B!O9F9R;V%D('9E:&EC;&5SQ`C$QKH?8`G&P7"J(!(B10#!("`V@PH*P@%8 M`@@'"`</`,+!@+`$L`0*`,%)5B[##,/"````"`<(!P\`PD5154E0345.5,0, MQ,:Z'P@'QL%PJB`2(D4`P2`@-X,*"L(!6`((!P@'#P#"P8"P!+`$"@#!5B[# M#,/"````"`<(!P\`PD12259)3D?$#,3&NA\(!\;!<*H@$B)%`,$@(#>#"L(! M6`((!P@'#P#"P@!8`F`)8`D4`,+"`%@"N`NX"QD`PL&`8`E@"10`P3$NP@`` M`+@+N`L9`,+##,-$;W5B;&4@0VQU=&-H:6YGQ`S$QKH?N`O&P7"J(!(B10#! M("`W@PK"`5@""`<(!P\`PL(`6`)@"6`)%`#"P@!8`K@+N`L9`,+!@&`)8`D4 M`,$R+L(```"X"[@+&0#"PPS#1G5E;"!-:6QE86=EQ`S$QKH?N`O&P7"J(!(B M10#!("`X@PK"`5@""`<(!P\`PL(`6`)@"6`)%`#"P@!8`K@+N`L9`,+!@&`) M8`D4`,$S+L(```"X"[@+&0#"PPS#5F5H:6-L92!);B!$965P(%=A=&5RQ`S$ MQKH?N`O&P7"J(!(B10#!("`Y@PH*P@%8`@@'"`</`,+!@+`$L`0*`,%622[# M#,/"````"`<(!P\`PE)%0T]615)9Q`S$QKH?"`?&P7"J(!(B10#!(#$P@PK4 M`0P```:3`#<`.!$,``'4P@%8`@@'"`</`,+"`%@"8`E@"10`PL&`"`<(!P\` MP4$NPPC#P@```&`)8`D4`,)4;W<@<W1R87!S("\@4F5C;W9E<GD@<W1R87!S MQ`C$QKH?8`G&P7"J(!(B10#!(#$P@PK"`5@""`<(!P\`PL(`6`)@"6`)%`#" MP@!8`K@+N`L9`,+!@&`)8`D4`,$Q+L(```"X"[@+&0#"PPS#5&]W:6YG('=I M=&@@8VAA:6YSQ`S$QKH?N`O&P7"J(!(B10#!(#$P@PK"`5@""`<(!P\`PL(` M6`)@"6`)%`#"P@!8`K@+N`L9`,+!@&`)8`D4`,$R+L(```"X"[@+&0#"PPS# M0VAO:V5R(&-H86ENQ`S$QKH?N`O&P7"J(!(B10#!(#$Q@PK"`5@""`<(!P\` MPL(`6`)@"6`)%`#"P@!8`K@+N`L9`,+!@&`)8`D4`,$S+L(```"X"[@+&0#" MPPS#5&]W(&AO;VMSQ`S$QKH?N`O&P7"J(!(B10#!(#$Q@PK"`5@""`<(!P\` MPL(`6`)@"6`)%`#"P@!8`K@+N`L9`,+!@&`)8`D4`,$T+L(```"X"[@+&0#" MPPS#0G)O:V5N('1O=R!H;V]K<\0,Q,:Z'[@+QL%PJB`2(D4`P2`Q,8,*P@%8 M`@@'"`</`,+"`%@"8`E@"10`PL(`6`*X"[@+&0#"P8!@"6`)%`#!-2["```` MN`NX"QD`PL,,PU!R979E;G1I=F4@;6%I;G1E;F%N8V7$#,3&NA^X"\;!<*H@ M$B)%`,$@,3&#"L(!6`((!P@'#P#"P@!8`F`)8`D4`,+"`%@"N`NX"QD`PL&` M8`E@"10`P38NP@```+@+N`L9`,+##,-296-O=F5R>2!O<&5R871I;VYSQ`S$ MQKH?N`O&P7"J(!(B10#!(#$Q@PH*P@%8`@@'"`</`,+!@+`$L`0*`,%624DN MPPS#P@````@'"`</`,)"3T19Q`S$QKH?"`?&P7"J(!(B10#!(#$S@PK4`0P` M``:3`#<`0A@,``'4P@%8`@@'"`</`,+"`%@"8`E@"10`PL&`"`<(!P\`P4$N MPPC#P@```&`)8`D4`,)!6$Q%4\0(Q,:Z'V`)QL%PJB`2(D4`P2`Q,X,*P@%8 M`@@'"`</`,+"`%@"8`E@"10`PL(`6`*X"[@+&0#"P8!@"6`)%`#!,2["```` MN`NX"QD`PL,,PU-T965R:6YG("!0;&%YQ`S$QKH?N`O&P7"J(!(B10#!(#$T M@PK"`5@""`<(!P\`PL(`6`)@"6`)%`#"P@!8`K@+N`L9`,+!@&`)8`D4`,$R M+L(```"X"[@+&0#"PPS#2$]4(%=!5$52(%1!3DM3Q`S$QKH?N`O&P7"J(!(B M10#!(#$W@PK"`5@""`<(!P\`PL(`6`)@"6`)%`#"P@!8`K@+N`L9`,+!@&`) M8`D4`,$S+L(```"X"[@+&0#"PPS#1$]/4B!(24Y'1<0,Q,:Z'[@+QL%PJB`2 M(D4`P2`Q.(,*P@%8`@@'"`</`,+"`%@"8`E@"10`PL(`6`*X"[@+&0#"P8!@ M"6`)%`#!-"["````N`NX"QD`PL,,PU)E87(@=VEN9&]W('=I;F0@9&5F;&5C M=&]R<\0,Q,:Z'[@+QL%PJB`2(D4`P2`Q.8,*U`$,```&DP`W`"P<#``!U,(! M6`((!P@'#P#"P@!8`F`)8`D4`,+!@`@'"`</`,%"+L,(P\(```!@"6`)%`#" M0D5$($E.(%)/5D52Q`C$QKH?8`G&P7"J(!(B10#!(#(P@PK4`0P```:3`#<` M]AP,``'4P@%8`@@'"`</`,+"`%@"8`E@"10`PL&`"`<(!P\`P4,NPPC#P@`` M`&`)8`D4`,)$249&)U/$",3&NA]@"<;!<*H@$B)%`,$@,C*#"M0!#```!I,` M-P#`'0P``=3"`5@""`<(!P\`PL(`6`)@"6`)%`#"P8`(!P@'#P#!1"[#",/" M````8`E@"10`PD)204M%4\0(Q,:Z'V`)QL%PJB`2(D4`P2`R-(,*U`$,```& MDP`W`(H>#``!U,(!6`((!P@'#P#"P@!8`F`)8`D4`,+!@`@'"`</`,%%+L,( MP\(```!@"6`)%`#"4W5M<"`F($5N9VEN92!0<F]T96-T:6]NQ`C$QKH?8`G& MP7"J(!(B10#!(#(U@PK"`5@""`<(!P\`PL(`6`)@"6`)%`#"P@!8`K@+N`L9 M`,+!@&`)8`D4`,$Q+L(```"X"[@+&0#"PPS#4V5A="!"96QT<\0,Q,:Z'[@+ MQL%PJB`2(D4`P2`R-H,*U`$,```&DP`W`!P@#``!U,(!6`((!P@'#P#"P@!8 M`F`)8`D4`,+!@`@'"`</`,%&+L,(P\(```!@"6`)%`#"4U!224Y'4\0(Q,:Z M'V`)QL%PJB`2(D4`P2`R-X,*P@%8`@@'"`</`,+"`%@"8`E@"10`PL(`6`*X M"[@+&0#"P8!@"6`)%`#!,2["````N`NX"QD`PL,,PTQE868@<W!R:6YG<\0, MQ,:Z'[@+QL%PJB`2(D4`P2`R-X,*P@%8`@@'"`</`,+"`%@"8`E@"10`PL(` M6`*X"[@+&0#"P8!@"6`)%`#!,B["````N`NX"QD`PL,,PU4@2F]I;G1S(&%N M9"!#5B!*;VEN='/$#,3&NA^X"\;!<*H@$B)%`,$@,CF#"L(!6`((!P@'#P#" MP@!8`F`)8`D4`,+"`%@"N`NX"QD`PL&`8`E@"10`P3,NP@```+@+N`L9`,+# M#,-796QD:6YG(&%L=6UI;FEU;<0,Q,:Z'[@+QL%PJB`2(D4`P2`S,(,*U`$, M```&DP`W`#XC#``!U,(!6`((!P@'#P#"P@!8`F`)8`D4`,+!@`@'"`</`,%' M+L,(P\(```!@"6`)%`#"3$]/2U/$",3&NA]@"<;!<*H@$B)%`,$@,S&#"L(! M6`((!P@'#P#"P@!8`F`)8`D4`,+"`%@"N`NX"QD`PL&`8`E@"10`P3$NP@`` M`+@+N`L9`,+##,-#3$5!3DE.1\0,Q,:Z'[@+QL%PJB`2(D4`P2`S,8,*P@%8 M`@@'"`</`,+"`%@"8`E@"10`PL(`6`*X"[@+&0#"P8!@"6`)%`#!,B["```` MN`NX"QD`PL,,PU)54U0@4%)/3T9)3D<@0T%2Q`S$QKH?N`O&P7"J(!(B10#! M(#,Q@PK"`5@""`<(!P\`PL(`6`)@"6`)%`#"P@!8`K@+N`L9`,+!@&`)8`D4 M`,$S+L(```"X"[@+&0#"PPS#4&%I;G1I;F<@4W5G9V5S=&EO;G/$#,3&NA^X M"\;!<*H@$B)%`,$@,S&#"L(!6`((!P@'#P#"P@!8`F`)8`D4`,+"`%@"N`NX M"QD`PL&`8`E@"10`P30NP@```+@+N`L9`,+##,-#04))3D54($E.($923TY4 MQ`S$QKH?N`O&P7"J(!(B10#!(#,T@PH*P@%8`@@'"`</`,+!@+`$L`0*`,%6 M24E)+L,,P\(`6`)@"6`)%`#"14Y'24Y%Q`S$QKH?8`G&P7"J(!(B10#!(#,U M@PK"`5@""`<(!P\`PL(`6`)@"6`)%`#"P@!8`K@+N`L9`,+!@&`)8`D4`,$Q M+L(```"X"[@+&0#"PPS#5T5"15(@0T%20L0,Q,:Z'[@+QL%PJB`2(D4`P2`S M-8,*U`$,```&DP`W`(`I#``!U,(!6`((!P@'#P#"P@!8`F`)8`D4`,+!@`@' M"`</`,%!+L,(P\(```!@"6`)%`#"1$E35%))0E543U+$",3&NA]@"<;!<*H@ M$B)%`,$@,S:#"L(!6`((!P@'#P#"P@!8`F`)8`D4`,+"`%@"N`NX"QD`PL&` M8`E@"10`P3$NP@```+@+N`L9`,+##,-D96-A<F)O;FEZ871I;VX@Q`S$QKH? MN`O&P7"J(!(B10#!(#,Y@PK4`0P```:3`#<`$BL,``'4P@%8`@@'"`</`,+" M`%@"8`E@"10`PL&`"`<(!P\`P4(NPPC#P@```&`)8`D4`,)'14%24\0(Q,:Z M'V`)QL%PJB`2(D4`P2`T,8,*P@%8`@@'"`</`,+"`%@"8`E@"10`PL(`6`*X M"[@+&0#"P8!@"6`)%`#!,2["````N`NX"QD`PL,,PU1R86YS;6ES<VEO;B`O M(%1R86YS9F5R(&-A<V4@<VAI9G0-<')O8FQE;7/$#,3&NA^X"\;!<*H@$B)% M`,$@-#&#U``<```6I"P!```````"````<"UP+7`ML`2P!!P``-2,P@%8`@@' M"`</`,+"`%@"8`E@"10`PL(`6`*X"[@+&0#"P8!@"6`)%`#!,B["````N`NX M"QD`PL,,PT-L=71C:"]'96%R(%!R;V)L96W$#,3&NA^X"\;!<*H@$B)%`,$@ M-#*#"@K"`5@""`<(!P\`PL&`L`2P!`H`P4E8+L,,P\(````(!P@'#P#"14Q% M0U1224-!3,0,Q,:Z'P@'QL%PJB`2(D4`P2`T-(,*U`$,```&DP`W`%@"#``! MU,(!6`((!P@'#P#"P@!8`F`)8`D4`,+!@`@'"`</`,%!+L,(P\(```!@"6`) M%`#"0V%R($)A='1E<FEE<\0(Q,:Z'V`)QL%PJB`2(D4`P2`T-(,*P@%8`@@' M"`</`,+"`%@"8`E@"10`PL(`6`*X"[@+&0#"P8!@"6`)%`#!,2["````N`NX M"QD`PL,,PTE.5%)/Q`S$QKH?N`O&P7"J(!(B10#!(#0T@PK"`5@""`<(!P\` MPL(`6`)@"6`)%`#"P@!8`K@+N`L9`,+!@&`)8`D4`,$R+L(```"X"[@+&0#" MPPS#0F%T=&5R>2!3=&]R86=E($-A<&%C:71YQ`S$QKH?N`O&P7"J(!(B10#! M(#0T@PK4`0P```:3`#<`L@0,``'4P@%8`@@'"`</`,+"`%@"8`E@"10`PL&` M"`<(!P\`P4(NPPC#P@```&`)8`D4`,)!3%1%4DY!5$]2Q`C$QKH?8`G&P7"J M(!(B10#!(#0V@PK4`0P```:3`#<`?`4,``'4P@%8`@@'"`</`,+"`%@"8`E@ M"10`PL&`"`<(!P\`P4,NPPC#P@```&`)8`D4`,)(3T]415)3Q`C$QKH?8`G& MP7"J(!(B10#!(#0X@PK"`5@""`<(!P\`PL(`6`)@"6`)%`#"P@!8`K@+N`L9 M`,+!@&`)8`D4`,$Q+L(```"X"[@+&0#"PPS#4U1!4E1%4B!-3U1/4L0,Q,:Z M'[@+QL%PJB`2(D4`P2`T.8,*P@%8`@@'"`</`,+"`%@"8`E@"10`PL(`6`*X M"[@+&0#"P8!@"6`)%`#!,B["````N`NX"QD`PL,,PVQI9VAT<\0,Q,:Z'[@+ MQL%PJB`2(D4`P2`U,(,*"L(!6`((!P@'#P#"P8"P!+`$"@#!6"[##,/"```` M"`<(!P\`PD=%3D5204S$#,3&NA\(!\;!<*H@$B)%`,$@-3*#"L(!6`((!P@' M#P#"P@!8`F`)8`D4`,+"`%@"N`NX"QD`PL&`8`E@"10`P3$NP@```+@+N`L9 M`,+##,-B=7-T960@8F]L=',@)B!S=6-HQ`S$QKH?N`O&P7"J(!(B10#!(#4R M@PH*P@%8`@@'"`</`,+!@+`$L`0*`,%822[##,/"````"`<(!P\`PE-43U)) M15/$#,3&NA\(!\;!<*H@$B)%`,$@-3.#"M0!#```!I,`-P"^"PP``=3"`5@" M"`<(!P\`PL(`6`)@"6`)%`#"P8`(!P@'#P#!02[#",/"````8`E@"10`PD-O M;F9E<W-I;VYS*&QE<W-O;G,I(&]F(&$@0F5G:6YN97+$",3&NA]@"<;!<*H@ M$B)%`,$@-3.#"M0!#```!I,`-P"(#`P``=3"`5@""`<(!P\`PL(`6`)@"6`) M%`#"P8`(!P@'#P#!0B[#",/"````8`E@"10`PD=%5%1)3D<@4U1254-+Q`C$ MQKH?8`G&P7"J(!(B10#!(#4T@PK4`0P```:3`#<`4@T,``'4P@%8`@@'"`</ M`,+"`%@"8`E@"10`PL&`"`<(!P\`P4,NPPC#P@```&`)8`D4`,)#2$%55D5, M)U,@05)-3U(Z(%1(12!,051%4U0@5$A)3D?$",3&NA]@"<;!<*H@$B)%`,$@ M-36#"M0!#```!I,`-P`<#@P``=3"`5@""`<(!P\`PL(`6`)@"6`)%`#"P8`( M!P@'#P#!1"[#",/"````8`E@"10`PE-4($U!2D]2Q`C$QKH?8`G&P7"J(!(B M10#!(#4U@PK4`0P```:3`#<`Y@X,``'4P@%8`@@'"`</`,+"`%@"8`E@"10` MPL&`"`<(!P\`P44NPPC#P@```&`)8`D4`,)!($Y)1TA4($]55,0(Q,:Z'V`) MQL%PJB`2(D4`P2`U-H,*U`$,```&DP`W`+`/#``!U,(!6`((!P@'#P#"P@!8 M`F`)8`D4`,+!@`@'"`</`,%&+L,(P\(```!@"6`)%`#"4D%,3%D@24X@1E)! M3D-%Q`C$QKH?8`G&P7"J(!(B10#!(#4W@PH*P@%8`@@'"`</`,+!@+`$L`0* M`,%824DNPPS#P@````@'"`</`,)!<V-I:2!2;W9E<G,@+2!/;&0@)B!.97<@ M*$QO;F<IQ`S$QKH?"`?&P7"J(!(B10#!(#8X@PH*P@%8`@@'"`</`,+!@+`$ ML`0*`,%824E)+L,,P\(`6`)@"6`)%`#"34544DE#($-/3E9%4E-)3TY3Q`S$ MQKH?8`G&P7"J(!(B10#!(#<S@PK4`0P```:3`#<`FA,,``'4P@%8`@@'"`</ M`,+"`%@"8`E@"10`PL&`"`<(!P\`P4$NPPC#P@```&`)8`D4`,)-:6QE86=E M($-O;G9E<G-I;VX@0VAA<G3$",3&NA]@"<;!<*H@$B)%`,$@-S.#"M0!#``` M!I,`-P!D%`P``=3"`5@""`<(!P\`PL(`6`)@"6`)%`#"P8`(!P@'#P#!0B[# M",/"````8`E@"10`PE5N:70@0V]N=F5R<VEO;G/$",3&NA]@"<;!<*H@$B)% M`,$@-S2#"IL*"M`+]P#0-L(F`0`````````````````````````````````` M`````````````````````-`VPB8!`%-T86YD87)D``````````!%4$1&6#4P M,"Y04E,`VP%X`!0>#!>,"@```-`VPB8!```````````````````````````` M````````````````````````````T#;")@$`4W1A;F1A<F0``````````$50 M1$98-3`P+E!24P#;`7@`%!X,%XP*``````+7L`2P!+`$L`0``0`````````` M```````````"``````````````````````````````#W``O0TQ$(`%5+54L( M`!'3U``<```6OA8"```````````#<"UP+7`ML`2P!!P``-0,PPS#PP[#Q`[$ #Q`S$ ` end 8328 bytes ------------------------------[ <- Message 70 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950301 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Barry Dudley" <DUDLEY@gate2.cc.unp.ac.za> Date: Tue, 28 Feb 1995 23:47:31 +200 Subject: REPLY TO MARK (OVERLANDING) HI MARK, TRIED TO SEND THIS TO YOU VIA YOUR E-MAIL ADDRESS BUT IT JUST BOUNCED BACK. I have been thinking of doing an OVERLAND trip from South Africa up africa to the UK. Taking about 6 months, with one vehicle but there will be 4 (have 3 so far) of us. I have a couple of files concerning EQUIPMENT, VEHCILE PREP, ETC that you may find useful. Shout if you would like to see any section in them. Good luck in your trip - the most fun is the preperation and then the journey and finally (way done) is actually getting there! One thing we have learnt is do not try to get too far in a day, I.E. never travel more than 5-6 hours a day. Cheers Barry /==============\ BARRY DUDLEY | | | E-MAIL: DUDLEY@MICR.UNP.AC.ZA [|______|_______|] UNIVERSITY OF NATAL, PMB /___/^^^^^^\___\ |(@) [####] (@)| 67 JESMOND ROAD | o [####] o | SCOTTSVILLE ======%%%%====== PIETERMARITZBURG {*}==={&&}==={*} 3201 SOUTH AFRICA {*} {*} PH - 0331 - 63123 WONDERING JOY; SIII; 1983; STATION WAGON; FORD V6 3L MOTOR NOTE: This mail message has enclosures, 2 more mail message(s) follow. The files are: A-CP SUM-V.CP uuencoded --- ------------------------------[ <- Message 71 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950301 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Barry Dudley" <DUDLEY@gate2.cc.unp.ac.za> Date: Tue, 28 Feb 95 23:47:31 +200 Subject: Enclosure file: A-CP TRANS AFRICA TRIP CONTENTS PAGE 2. INTRO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 3. CONTRIBUTORS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 3.1. PEOPLE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 3.2. BOOKS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 3.3. INTERNET . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 3.3.1. LAND ROVER FAQ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 3.3.2. STUDENT AND BUDGET TRAVEL RESOURCE GUIDE: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 3.3.3. Alt.Travel.Road-trip . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 3.3.4. 4 Wheels On... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 3.3.5. Tourism in South Africa. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 3.3.6. THE AFRICAN NEWS & INFORMATION SERVICE . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 3.3.7. malawi discussion list . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 3.3.8. soc.culture.african. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 3.3.9. rec.travel library . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 3.3.10. TRAVEL-ADVISORIES MAILING LIST . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 3.3.11. Rec.Travel.Misc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 3.3.12. ROUND-THE-WORLD TRAVEL GUIDE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 3.3.13. Ford Explorer Owners . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 3.3.14. Offroad mailing list . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 3.3.15. LAND ROVER OWNERS LIST . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 4. PERSONAL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 4.1. INTRO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 4.2. REQUIREMENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 4.2.1. WARM WEATHER GEAR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 4.2.2. WET/COLD WEATHER GEAR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 4.2.3. OTHER. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 4.3. DOCUMENTS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 4.4. POST . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 4.5. LANGUAGE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 4.6. DAILY ROUTINE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 4.7. BOOKS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 5. CAMPING. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 5.1. INTRO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 5.2. ACCOMMODATION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 5.3. WATER. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 5.3.1. Boil or Filter?. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 5.3.2. water filters. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 5.4. COOKING STUFF. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 5.5. FOOD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 5.5.1. GENERAL. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 5.5.2. BREKFAST . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 5.5.3. LUNCH. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 5.5.4. SUPPER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 5.6. CAMP FRIDGES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 6. FIRST AID. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 6.1. INTRO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 6.2. VACCINATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 6.3. MEDICAL KIT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 6.4. MEDICAL PROBLEMS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 6.4.1. MALARIA. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 6.4.2. HEAT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 6.4.3. DIARRHOEA. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 6.4.4. DYSENTERY. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 6.4.5. INSECTS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 6.4.6. BILHARZIA. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 7. MONEY. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 7.1. INTRO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 7.2. PERSONAL BANK GUARANTEE/CREDIT LETTER. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 7.3. COST . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 7.4. BUDGETING TRIP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 7.4.1. BEFORE DEPARTURE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 7.4.2. DURING TRIP. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 7.4.3. EXCHANGE RATES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 8. GENERAL. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 8.1. TIME . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 8.2. 2ND VEHICLE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 8.3. TRAVEL COMPANIONS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 8.4. WHEN TO TRAVEL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 8.5. DESERT SURVIVAL SAFETY TIPS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 8.5.1. RECOMMENDED SURVIVAL ITEMS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 a. PERSONAL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 9. VEHICLE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 9.1. INTRO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 9.2. DOCUMENTS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 9.3. LAND ROVER INFORMATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 9.3.1. LICENCE DETAILS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 9.3.2. ENGINE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 9.3.3. DIMENSIONS:. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 9.3.4. TRANSMISSION:. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 9.3.5. STEERING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 9.3.6. BRAKES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 9.3.7. SUSPENSION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 9.3.8. WHEELS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 9.3.9. BODY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 9.3.10. REQUIREMENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 a. LIGHTING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 b. GAUGES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 c. BATTERIES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 d. SECURITY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 e. FUEL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 f. VEHICLE STRENGTHENING. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 g. DAILY INSPECTIONS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 h. Seat Belts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 9.3.11. GETTING UNSTUCK. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 a. GENERAL MAINENANCE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 9.4. EQUIPMENT LIST . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 9.4.1. VEHICLE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 a. SAFETY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 9.4.2. SPARES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 a. FILTERS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 b. ELECTRICAL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 c. ENGINE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 d. FLUIDS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 e. WHEELS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 f. ELECTRICAL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 g. PERSONNEL. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 h. VEHICLE GENERAL. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 i. ENGINE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 j. EXPENSIVE SPARES CONSIDER TAKING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 9.4.3. TOOLS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 a. EMERGENCY/STUCK. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 b. ENGINE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 c. GENERAL. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 d. BODY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 e. LITERATURE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 9.4.4. ADVICE FROM DESERT MEN:. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 9.5. Conversion chart . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 10. ROUTE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 10.1. INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 10.2. MAPS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 10.3. ROUTE RESTRICTIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 10.4. VISA REQUIREMENTS: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 10.5. DETAILED ROUTE DESCRIPTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 10.6. SOUTHERN AFRICA. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 10.6.1. ADVICE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 10.6.2. SOUTH AFRICA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 10.6.3. NAMIBIA. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 10.6.4. BOTSWANA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46 10.6.5. ZIMBABWE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49 10.6.6. MOZAMBIQUE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 10.6.7. Zambia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52 10.6.8. MALAWI . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54 10.7. CENTRAL AFRICA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56 10.7.1. ADVICE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56 10.7.2. TANZANIA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56 10.7.3. KENYA. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56 10.7.4. UGANDA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58 10.7.5. ZAIRE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60 10.7.6. CENTRAL AFRICAN REPUBLIC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60 10.8. WEST AFRICA. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61 10.8.1. Advice . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61 10.8.2. CAMEROON . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61 10.8.3. NIGER. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61 10.8.4. Algeria. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61 10.8.5. Algeria. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65 10.8.6. Nigeria. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67 10.8.7. MOROCCO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67 10.9. NORTHERN AFRICA. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69 10.9.1. ADICE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69 10.9.2. SUDAN. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69 10.9.3. EGYPT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69 10.10. OTHER AFRICAN STATES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70 10.10.1. CHAD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70 10.10.2. MALI . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71 10.10.3. MAURITANIA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73 10.10.4. Guinea . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74 10.10.5. Equatorial Guinea. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77 10.10.6. Ghana. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79 10.10.7. Gambia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81 10.10.8. Gabon. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83 10.10.9. Liberia. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84 10.10.10. Sierra Leone . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 86 10.10.11. Syria. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 88 10.10.12. Burkina Faso . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90 10.10.13. Cote d'Ivoire. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92 10.10.14. Yemen. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 94 10.10.15. Sudan. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96 10.10.16. Swaziland. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98 10.10.17. Togo . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 99 11. PLANNING A TRIP THROUGH AFRICA BY Richard Jordan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 102 11.0.1. trip advice. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 106 11.1. Long cold nights - a trip to alexandria. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 108 TRANS AFRICA TRIP 2. INTRO. I have attempted to bring all the information collected by a few us us going on A TRANS-AFRICAN TRIP LATER THIS YEAR. The information is directed for a low-budget, small group with 6 months to do it. Own transport as a LAND ROVER will be used. THE OVERLAND TRIP ACROSS THE AFRICAN CONTINENT IS STILL ONE OF THE GREATEST MOTORING CHALLENGES IN THE WORLD. ONE DOES NOT NEED A GREAT DEAL OF MONEY, JUST AMBITION TO UNDERTAKE SUCH AN EXPEDITION, AND THE PERSEVERANCE TO PUSH THROUGH WITH THE PLANNING AND THE ACTUAL TRIP TO THE END. Travelling overland is not just a means of getting somewhere. It is one of the most challenging experiences that can be undertaken in our rapidly changing world. Africa - a vast land of diverse beauty has for centuries attracted explores and adventures. Now as never before, Africa is opening up for the adventurous traveller. THERE ARE THREE IMPORTANT ASPECTS TO PREVENT DISASTER. The first and most important is to do sufficient planning. Such a trip must not be undertaken lightly, and should be planned on an expedition basis (over a year period). The second is to have an adequately prepared and equipped vehicle which MUST NOT BE OVERLOADED. The third is lack of respect and appreciation of the elements that are to be faced. In brackets after the details i have put who will be providing it. IF IT HAS A R = REQUIRED; Y = WE HAVE IT; N = NOT GOING TO GET; ? = DO WE NEED TO GET IT?? ------------------------------[ <- Message 72 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950301 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 1995 23:11:55 -0800 From: mcdpw@pacific.pacific.net (Granville Pool) Subject: Re: 1989 vs 1988 Range Rovers Mr. Yee, I am one of those who mentioned this difference: >The Want Ad read: "RANGE ROVER '88 70k, blue/gray, immac. $19K." So, >what are some of the differences someone getting into the used RR market >should know when deciding between the much-acclaimed '89s vs '88s? Thanks! John Brabyn can, no doubt, tell you more but the main salient differences between the '88 and '89 are that the '88 has a 3.5-liter V-8 and its transfer case has a driver-lockable open differential (like the current Defender 90 and Discovery); the '89 has a 3.9-liter V-8 (really significant difference in performance) and a viscous coupling in the transfer case. Both differences are very important, in my opinion. If the price were right, I'd consider an '88 but $19,000 would not be that price. No more than $15,000, I'd say, probably should be less, for the mileage. Did you see that there were a couple of pretty reasonable '89s advertised in the Bay Area in the last few days? Around $19,000, also, I think. Hope this helps. Granville Pool <mcdpw@pacific.pacific.net> Redwood Valley, California, USA (707) 485-7220 Home, (707) 463-4265 Work '52, '60, '61, '73, and '74 SWB Land-Rovers and Austin Champ (military 4x4) ------------------------------[ <- Message 73 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950301 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
END OF LAND ROVER OWNER DIGESTBack Forward
Photos & text Copyright 1990-2011 Bill Caloccia, All rights reserved.
Digest Messages Copyright 1990-2011 by the original poster or/and Bill Caloccia, All rights reserved.