[ First Message Last | Table of Contents | <- Digest -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
msg | Sender | lines | Subject |
1 | Roger Sinasohn [sinasohn | 48 | Re: My Series II is alive! |
2 | jory@MIT.EDU (jory bell) | 17 | Re: '72 SIII |
3 | dixon@fourfold.ocunix.on | 18 | [not specified] |
4 | Steve Methley [sgm@hplb. | 36 | Re: 235/85R16 tires on a RR |
5 | "Mr T.stevenson" [gbfv08 | 40 | Military LR chassis underseal |
6 | Brian Willoughby [BAWILL | 27 | Joe Lucas has stopped by for a visit |
7 | "Russell G. Dushin" [dus | 19 | Re: seatbelts |
8 | Jon Humphrey [jh5r+@andr | 21 | Re: Joe Lucas has stopped by for a visit |
9 | "Mugele, Gerry" [Gerry.M | 21 | Seatbelts |
10 | DEBROWN@SRP.GOV | 32 | Tallest tire to fit on a Discovery? |
11 | Russell Burns [burns@cis | 22 | D-90 only does 90 |
12 | brabyn@skivs.ski.org (Jo | 10 | Re: D-90 only does 90 |
13 | mcdpw@pacific.pacific.ne | 61 | Let's build a glossary |
14 | Gregory Brown [brow7767@ | 21 | English parts suppliers on the net |
15 | Andrew Steele [ad158@DAY | 45 | BMW Diesel? |
16 | LANDROVER@delphi.com | 32 | Re: English parts suppliers on the net |
17 | LANDROVER@delphi.com | 31 | Re: Seatbelts |
18 | LANDROVER@delphi.com | 19 | Re: Let's build a glossary |
19 | Roger Sinasohn [sinasohn | 45 | Re: Joe Lucas has stopped by for a visit |
20 | Roger Sinasohn [sinasohn | 14 | Re: Nigel has a bed to sleep on |
21 | Roger Sinasohn [sinasohn | 13 | Re: Back-issue LR sighting |
22 | Brad Krohn [Brad_Krohn@c | 20 | Glossary and hooters |
23 | NAVIGATOR2@aol.com | 9 | Land Rover newsletter |
24 | LANDROVER@delphi.com | 27 | Re: Glossary and hooters |
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 1994 00:33:41 -0800 From: Roger Sinasohn <sinasohn@crl.com> Subject: Re: My Series II is alive! Stuart Moore asked: >5. Does anyone know where I can find a used right front fender? I only > need [ truncated by lro-digester (was 10 lines)] > and >body filler? Give Scotty a call at (510) 686-2255. He may have an extra fender around, or know of one. Otherwise, Rovers North or British Pacific. >6. Where is the best place to put a radio in a rover? What about > speakers? >the outside piece. Seems that the former owner had the right front wheel Here's one I can maybe help with. My intention is to (someday) build a cabinet over the front windshield, where the sun visors would normally be, to house a radio, celphone, GPS, and CB. I'll probably mount the speakers on the bottom of this. I'll also probably put a couple of minimus-7 types at the back by the windows on either side of the rear door. I've also thought about a couple mounted on the sides, just behind the drivers/passengers head. Another setup I've seen is to run a sort of shelf straight back from the rear-view mirror, to a cross-wise shelf just behind the front seats. The radio is mounted in the lengthwise part for easy access, and the speakers near the sides mounted on the bottom of the crosswise part. This is good because the radio is hearable front and back. The third setup I've seen (or remembered, anyway) is to removed the middle seat and put in a cubby box with a stereo. My 88" currently has the stereo sorta jammed in above the dashboard. I guess you can tell how good I am at getting around to building all these neat things I spend my time thinking up, eh? --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Uncle Roger "There is pleasure pure in being mad sinasohn@crl.com that none but madmen know." Roger Louis Sinasohn & Associates San Francisco, California ------------------------------[ <- Message 2 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 941123 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 1994 01:05:23 -0800 From: jory@MIT.EDU (jory bell) Subject: Re: '72 SIII >Russell finds a SIII >> I've found someone selling a '72 SIII with a solid frame with only light [ truncated by lro-digester (was 12 lines)] >through. My opinion is that SIII's rust out quicker than IIa's .. at least >up North. (My SerIII is a study in rust and re-welds!) make sure to bang on the frame *A LOT HARDER* than you think is necessary/advisable/appropriate.... also, don't forget to bang on the frame *REAL HARD* -jory bell jory@mit.edu ------------------------------[ <- Message 3 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 941123 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Subject: seatbelts From: dixon@fourfold.ocunix.on.ca (dixon kenner) Date: Tue, 22 Nov 94 02:01:06 -0500 Benjamin Allan Smith <bens@archimedes.vislab.navy.mil> writes: > Anyone out there know when seatbelts were standard in Land Rovers. > I especially want to know when the seatbelts in back became standard. Canada... seatbelts in the back... Never In front it was 1972 when the legislation came in. -- dixon kenner, dixon@fourfold.ocunix.on.ca FourFold Symmetry, | Ottawa Valley Land Rovers Nepean, Ontario, Canada | 1016 Normandy Crescent, Nepean (OVLR's InterNet site) | Ontario, Canada, K2C 0L4 ------------------------------[ <- Message 4 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 941123 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Steve Methley <sgm@hplb.hpl.hp.com> Subject: Re: 235/85R16 tires on a RR Date: Tue, 22 Nov 94 10:49:11 GMT To the RR jacker: 235 tires are 9.25 inches wide - what rims do you run? Ideally the rim should be no more than 2 inches smaller. This is why LR don't fit 750's to SWB rims, but only to the wider LWB rims. RR steel wheels are 6 inches wide and alloys are 6.5 I believe (?). I wouldn't drive about on 9.25 inch wide tyres on 6.5 inch rims - perhaps this explains the altered handling characteristics of the original post! For the person who asked about diameters: 80% is the standard aspect ratio for radials and is often unstated eg 205R16. The diameter is then 28.9 inches. For 235/85R16 it is 31.7 inches, ie an increase in diff clearance of 1.4 inches. You could run 7.50x16 crossplys (which normally have 100% aspect), still get 1.1 inch extra clearance and yet have a safe tyre for your rim. You'll also get better digging with the narrower tyre (assuming that's what you want). Don't forget the tyre sizes have quite a wide tolerance and wear can affect diameter of course. I run 205 Trackers rear and T+C front with the n/s front being assymetric for pleasant roundabout work (really!). BTW, what do you think jacking the RR does to the working drivetrain joint angles? BTW2, I recently rejoined the list: Was the article about bending a six week old Disco by joyriding backwards a joke? Cheers, Steve. 79 RR ------------------------------[ <- Message 5 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 941123 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Mr T.stevenson" <gbfv08@udcf.gla.ac.uk> Subject: Military LR chassis underseal Date: Tue, 22 Nov 1994 10:41:12 +0000 (GMT) To Russell G. Dushin I have previously owned 3 ex-military Land Rovers, all of which had the thick underseal applied to their chassis. I found that as it aged, it tended to lift away from the metal underneath and retain water against the metal all the time. This is a serious problem here on the island because of the ubiquitous salt spray (and the odd boat launching). While I was rebuilding my last Series III, I had the chassis shot blasted to remove all traces of underseal and rust. This cost me about 20 pounds at a Glasgow metal finishers. After a bit of hole patching, I then enlarged all the drain holes in the bottom of the chassis rails and drilled new ones in the closed bits, e.g the bulkhead outriggers. Following numerous coats of Hammerite paint, I poured about a gallon of Waxoyl diluted with white spirit down the inside of each chassis rail and turned it over a few times to coat all the walls (strong assistants recommended!) I don't know if you will need to use such drastic measures, but I would certainly advise removing the underseal. The rebuilt rover lived on the island for seven years until I sold it a few months ago without any chassis corrosion problems. With regard to the battery location, if you remove the air filter from the front right of the engine compartment and weld in a battery frame/filter holder from a civilian spec machine, you can fit one battery there. There should be enough room to fit in a second battery holder at the left hand front corner for the winch etc. I'm not sure whether long cables from the back of the vehicle would be such a good idea because of the voltage drop, but I could be wrong. I hope these ramblings are of some use to you. best regards -- Tom Stevenson: gbfv08@udcf.gla.ac.uk University Marine Biological Station, Isle of Cumbrae, Scotland Tel:(0475) 530581 Fax:(0475) 530601 ------------------------------[ <- Message 6 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 941123 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 94 09:30:33 EST From: Brian Willoughby <BAWILL01@UKCC.UKY.EDU> Subject: Joe Lucas has stopped by for a visit Here's an interesting problem I've had recently with my '60 Series II: When driving at night, I have found it necessary to use my headlamps. No problem with that. However, every so often, when I arrive at home and pull into the garage and turn the lamps off, the entire car shuts down as if I had shut off the ignition. This only happens at low RPM's as, if I gun the motor, and shut off the lamps, the car keeps running. I have that little swith in the middle of the dash that controls the parking and headlamps and has the key switch in the middle. The first time it happened, I was returning home from a short trip, saw someone I knew and flipped on the lamps to announce "Good day!," turned them back off and the car died in the middle of the road. Every since, I have always kept the lamps on or off until I reach my destination. As most everyone knows, I'm in the middle of a restoration with this car which will include a new wiring loom, though until that is begun and completed, it would be nice to be able to still use the car. Finding out what the cause of this is would help immensely. Remember, I'm in graduate school and the restoration is proceeding slowly since the majority of my money has to be sadly directed elsewhere. You can post directly to me or the entire list. I'm sure everyone else would enjoy the explanations. Thanks. Brian Willoughby bawill01@ukcc.uky.edu "May the Prince of Darkness watch over our souls." ------------------------------[ <- Message 7 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 941123 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Russell G. Dushin" <dushinrg@pr.cyanamid.com> Subject: Re: seatbelts Date: Tue, 22 Nov 94 10:43:28 EST > Anyone out there know when seatbelts were standard in Land Rovers. > I especially want to know when the seatbelts in back became standard. [ truncated by lro-digester (was 12 lines)] > bens@archimedes.vislab.navy.mil > 1972 Land Rover Series III 88 Our family '60 88 (a '61 by serial number but bought in the mid summer of '60) did not have seatbelts. When the '67 88 arrived it had 'em and boy were we "wowed". The rear seats did NOT have the belts in it, however-just in all front 3. Any '68ers got em? rd/nige (retrofitted with 5 belts) ------------------------------[ <- Message 8 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 941123 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 1994 12:26:21 -0500 (EST) From: Jon Humphrey <jh5r+@andrew.cmu.edu> Subject: Re: Joe Lucas has stopped by for a visit Brian, this has happened to me a lot, but I think it is just the bakelite switch housing causes the key bezel to rotate enough to shut off the ignition. Or your thumb or finger brushes against the key and turns it off. It dosen't take much. I wouldn't worry about it, just turn the key back on. But then it could have been designed into the cars Lucas electrical system, like the parking lights flashing three times when you lock the door. Later Jon >Here's an interesting problem I've had recently with my '60 Series II: When >driving at night, I have found it necessary to use my headlamps. No problem [ truncated by lro-digester (was 12 lines)] >trip, saw someone I knew and flipped on the lamps to announce "Good day!," >turned them back off and the car died in the middle of the road. Every since, >I have always kept the lamps on or off until I reach my destination. As most ------------------------------[ <- Message 9 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 941123 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Mugele, Gerry" <Gerry.Mugele@wellsfargo.com> Subject: Seatbelts Date: Tue, 22 Nov 94 10:45:00 PST Benjamin Smith asks <<Anyone out there know when seatbelts were standard in Land Rovers. I especially want to know when the seatbelts in back became standard.>> My '69 88" hardtop had seven(!!!) sets of seatbelt when new. Shoulder Harness for Driver and Shotgun, lap belt middle front and two set of lapbelts for both rear bench seats. Think this was the result of U.S. Federal law. My '67 (bought used) had absolutely no provision for seatbelts: no anchors, bolts or anything. Had to bolt plates to the underside to provide attachment points. Gerry Mugele. R45 -** Tried to house break my piano - but keep finding a piano stool in the living room ------------------------------[ <- Message 10 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 941123 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 94 12:40:31 MST From: DEBROWN@SRP.GOV Subject: Tallest tire to fit on a Discovery? FROM: David Brown Internet: debrown@srp.gov Computer Graphics Specialist * Mapping Services & Engr Graphics PAB219 (602)236-3544 - Pager:6486 External (602)275-2508 #6486 SUBJECT: Tallest tire to fit on a Discovery? Does anyone know what tire size is the tallest that will fit on a Disco? After seeing the rear tire FULLY engulfed by the wheel well, it doesn't look like a taller tire is possible, as there was barely a finger's width between the tire and the body side at the rear of the rear tire. It MAY be possible though, to fit a taller tire if it were narrower. I noticed that the Camel trophy Disco's have narrow tires, anyone know what size these are? They look sort of funny though.... Maybe it's just me, Americans seem to lust after wide tires. My reason for wanting a taller tire is for more ground clearance. Someone else posted a note about changing springs on a Range Rover to accomplish this, would this also be possible for a Disco? Anyone know what the part numbers of spec's would be? Also, I read somewhere that the Camel trophy Disco's had a suspension modification, again, anyone know exactly what that modification was? Inquiring minds want to know.... (And imitate!) #=====# Never doubt that a small group of individuals |___|__\___ can change the world... indeed, it's the only | | | | thing that ever has. ""O""""""O"" -Margaret Mead ------------------------------[ <- Message 11 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 941123 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Russell Burns <burns@cisco.com> Subject: D-90 only does 90 Date: Tue, 22 Nov 94 12:36:55 PST I found out that I can`t keep up with the 100MPH traffic in the left lane. The 90 cuts off at 90 MPH. The R-Rover will only do 98 with the roof rack on so I guess its not too bad..... I also am having some problems with the starter. It looks like the trip thru the pond might have crudded up the selnoid(sp). every once in a while all I get is a click. I had to roll it down the hill the other morning to get it to start. Well that is what warrantys are for. I took the d-90 in for the 1000 mile checkup, and while they changed the oil, they didn't bother with the filter. their cheapewr than I am. So far I am ave about 16 MPG at 70mph. Russ ------------------------------[ <- Message 12 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 941123 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 94 14:01:29 PST From: brabyn@skivs.ski.org (John Brabyn) Subject: Re: D-90 only does 90 I recall reading somewhere that the 90 is cutout-limited to 85mph. Maybe it's really 90 -- that would seem appropriate!! John Brabyn 89RR ------------------------------[ <- Message 13 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 941123 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 1994 16:36:52 -0800 From: mcdpw@pacific.pacific.net (Granville Pool) Subject: Let's build a glossary Fellow Net-Rovers: I received the following question from newbie Jason LaBranch >Granville, >I have another question. How can I learn all the names of parts on [ truncated by lro-digester (was 10 lines)] >Thanks, >Jason I replied: >Regarding terminology. "Bulkhead" is the British equivalent of firewall but on >a Land-Rover also refers to other structural cross-body members separating >compartments (as behind the cab area in an 88 = "rear bulkhead"). "Gearbox" is >the British term for transmission. "Main box" is the normal (main) >transmission; "Transfer box" is the British equivalent of transfer case. >"windcreen" for windshield, "bonnet" for hood, "hood" for a crude soft-top such >as on Land-Rovers and roadsters (but a true convertable, with a soft-top which >folds down easily and stays in place, is called a "drop-head coupe" --with an >acute accent mark over the "e" on "coupe" -- whereas a hard-top, of course, is >called a "fixed-head coupe"). >The prize has got to be the currently much-discussed "radiator breakfast." >There are numerous differences in British english for tools, materials, and [ truncated by lro-digester (was 6 lines)] >spelling (and/or pronunciation), such as "carburettor" for carburetor and >"aluminium" for aluminum. Lots of fun! There are some terms that I am not, >after 2 Jaguars, 15 Land-Rovers, and an Austin, quite sure whether refer to >some equivalent American item or really something quite different, which has no >Yank counterpart, particularly in the case of certain supplies, such as the >much discussed "Waxoil" and "silicone grease." >Once you have a Land-Rover, you can get a Haynes service manual and find most >of the translation in a glossary in the front. If you buy a Rover from me, I >will give you a Haynes manual, as I have an extra one. Otherwise, check the >two Land-Rover "web" sites mentioned in the footer at the bottom of the LRO >daily digest (one site in Texas and one in Australia). The Texas one, at >least, has an FAQ section which may have what you are looking for. If not, it >should probably be added and maybe I could be induced to help compile it. But I checked the Texas web site and found no glossary. I posted a message to Greg Hiner about it and he made the most excellent suggestion that I post my original message (above) to the net and solicit your participation. Please don't send me the obvious terms that are in the front of the Haynes manual, as I can type those in myself. But there are plenty of more esoteric and arcane shibboleths to unearth and I know some of you out there will love to tell us what they are. I will compile and post to net as well as sending to Greg for the web. Thanks! Shall I duck? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ [ Granville Pool (Redwood Valley, CA) Appraiser, R/W Agent, LR aficionado ] [ e-mail: mcdpw@pacific.pacific.net ** Ph:(707)485-7220 H,(707)463-4265 W ] ------------------------------[ <- Message 14 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 941123 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 1994 19:41:38 -0500 (EST) From: Gregory Brown <brow7767@mstr.hgc.edu> Subject: English parts suppliers on the net I would like to feed a question out to our friends in the homeland. Are there any parts suppliers in England that have access to the net? I have done some inquiries with John Craddock and Paddock Motors about sourcing parts. They are more than willing to quote based on a fax but, it is much cheaper to correspond through the net. So if anyone can give me help I would appreciate it. ************************************ My second question is concerning increasing the highway speed of a series IIA. What are the pros and cons of going with an overdrive vs RR diffs? I have a fairly strong 2 1/4 with 15" tires. I thought about going to 16" tires but I like the 15" with Uniroyal Tiger Paw XTM, good in the mud and snow, very quiet on the road. Are there any other choices that I am missing? Greg Brown '70 Series IIA ------------------------------[ <- Message 15 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 941123 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 1994 20:24:04 -0500 From: Andrew Steele <ad158@DAYTON.WRIGHT.EDU> Subject: BMW Diesel? Ok, correct me if I'm wrong, but hasn't there been discussion about the BMW 5 cylinder diesel being both US emission approved and a bolt in replacement for RR? On that assumption, dog, rover and I stopped by our local BMW dealer for the first time ever to chat tonight. Actually, it was really pathetic the way the hungry dogs were just hanging onto me. Anyway, I was directed to the "pack leader" whom had just returned from a one week BMW what's new for you type of class. He declared no knowledge of any new diesel, barked never in the good ol USA, said some disparaging remarks about the last BMW diesel vintage early 1980's or there about; then had the gull to try and appease me by saying he thought they might soon be a Range Rover dealer. OH PLEASE, Say It Ain't To Be So. (Well, I supose I can always stop by anytime to get my boots shined). OK, maybe my mistake was stopping by while still wearing my tie. Maybe if I arrived at the show room with enough light for them to see what's left of the mud on the RR, boots and any of the greasy jeans, reality would have hit them a little quicker. Jeeeeeeeeeezzzze, they hit a sore spot w/me here. Anyway, I guess I'll keep dreaming about a complete engine failure. (Well, it's the prequisite for a change over anyway. What with only 80,000 miles on the 87 RR, I figure another 10 to 12 years should get me to that point) Sorry for the expressions of fustration- anyway, I still want to describe the the Columbus Ohio Land Rover salesman's expression as his dealer tagged demo 90 was thrashed in the mudhole in Parkersburg WV two weekends ago -- but maybe you can guess. Anyway, I now realize it must have especially pained him as I commented with fever, that I was sure my LR dealer would never let me test any of their demostrators, the way he was allowing his to be driven; well say more like stampeded, into the hole. Anyway, suffice it to say, it was a jolly good show! My rover, my freedom. AMS and Lum 87 RR Dayton, Ohio ad158@Dayton.Wright.EDU ------------------------------[ <- Message 16 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 941123 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: LANDROVER@delphi.com Date: Tue, 22 Nov 1994 23:42:02 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: English parts suppliers on the net Greg Brown thinks his IIa should go faster... > My second question is concerning increasing the highway speed of a series > IIA. What are the pros and cons of going with an overdrive vs RR diffs? [ truncated by lro-digester (was 7 lines)] > and snow, very quiet on the road. Are there any other choices that I am > missing? A very long hill with a strong tailwind and Mexican overdrive... Yeah, that's the ticket... ;-) I've been running 16" wheels with (choke) bias ply snow/mud tires for years now.. I had an overdrive - purchased used - but it got tired so I don't run one now.. 16" with overdrive was bearable. Recently, I've decided to put 15" wheels with radials on it.. just for grins.. (Its gonna snow soon and I want to slide around.. I'm a sick puppy). At 50 MPH the engine sounds like things are ready to come apart.. Maybe it always sounded that way.. could never hear with all the tire noise. I don't know. Don't know about RR diffs. What *do* I know?? 16" wheels with good tires.. That would be my answer. Cheers Michael Loiodice E-MAIL landrover@delphi.com 166 W.Fulton St. VOICE (518) 773-2697 Gloversville NY, 12078 1972 Ser III 88 Petrol (Fern) 1971 Ser IIa 88 Petrol 1965 Ser IIa 88 Petrol ------------------------------[ <- Message 17 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 941123 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: LANDROVER@delphi.com Date: Tue, 22 Nov 1994 23:42:28 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: Seatbelts Seatbelts... Gerry adds his two bits.. I'll add mine.. > Benjamin Smith asks <<Anyone out there know when seatbelts were > standard in Land Rovers. [ truncated by lro-digester (was 10 lines)] > lapbelts for both rear bench seats. Think this was the result of U.S. > Federal law. My '67 (bought used) had absolutely no provision for Don't know what the Land Rover seatbelt story is, but I'm real familiar with the older Triumph Spitfires. I'm sure that seatbelts were required (by Federal law) in 1969. I had five Spitfires.. '64, 2 '67's, a '68 and a '69. (Still have the '64). All had belts but the '69 were totally differant. My '65 88 has belts... fronts only.. but they say Triumph on them.. go figure. Now, another twist to the story.. I believe that the New York State requires vehicles from 1965 and later to have belts for driver and passenger. I'm not real sure about it, but I know my '64 TR is exempt. Cheers Michael Loiodice E-MAIL landrover@delphi.com 166 W.Fulton St. VOICE (518) 773-2697 Gloversville NY, 12078 1972 Ser III 88 Petrol (Fern) 1971 Ser IIa 88 Petrol 1965 Ser IIa 88 Petrol ------------------------------[ <- Message 18 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 941123 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: LANDROVER@delphi.com Date: Tue, 22 Nov 1994 23:43:04 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: Let's build a glossary OK.. Granville.. DUCK (or is it Duckhams??) I've also hear the canvas top on a Landy referred to as a "Tilt". Then, there's the ever popular "boot" (trunk?) How about "wing" (Fender). One I'm not sure about.. some of my Triumph friends refer to the horn as the "hooter". Cheers Michael Loiodice E-MAIL landrover@delphi.com 166 W.Fulton St. VOICE (518) 773-2697 Gloversville NY, 12078 1972 Ser III 88 Petrol (Fern) 1971 Ser IIa 88 Petrol 1965 Ser IIa 88 Petrol ------------------------------[ <- Message 19 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 941123 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 1994 21:04:41 -0800 From: Roger Sinasohn <sinasohn@crl.com> Subject: Re: Joe Lucas has stopped by for a visit >Here's an interesting problem I've had recently with my '60 Series II: When >driving at night, I have found it necessary to use my headlamps. No problem I, too, have found this helpful in preventing accidents. [8^) >with that. However, every so often, when I arrive at home and pull into the >garage and turn the lamps off, the entire car shuts down as if I had shut [ truncated by lro-digester (was 19 lines)] >bawill01@ukcc.uky.edu >"May the Prince of Darkness watch over our souls." Sounds to me like either a faulty switch, or corroded or loose/flakey connections. If the latter, gunning the engine would give enough juice to jump past the loose/corroded connection, but without that, there wouldn't be enough power. Turning off the lights may be jiggling things enough to switch from juice getting through to not making it. I would say pull the dashboard off and take a look around. If things look okay, wire a switch in parallel for the ignition, switch that on, and see if the same problem happens. That is, To <---.------------------. the | | rest / <-- Key switch / <-- Add this to bypass the key switch of the | | car <---'------------------' If the problem still happens, even though power can get through the switch you added, that means the problem is elsewhere than the key switch. If it doesn't happen, the problem *is* the key switch. Radio Shack or any electronics parts place can sell you key switches (not Genuine Land Rover, but intended for garage door openers, security systems, and the like) that you can add to or replace the original switch with. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Uncle Roger "There is pleasure pure in being mad sinasohn@crl.com that none but madmen know." Roger Louis Sinasohn & Associates San Francisco, California ------------------------------[ <- Message 20 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 941123 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 1994 21:04:49 -0800 From: Roger Sinasohn <sinasohn@crl.com> Subject: Re: Nigel has a bed to sleep on Why not take a few pictures, and send them along with the text of your message to Brad for the Aluminum Workhorse? --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Uncle Roger "There is pleasure pure in being mad sinasohn@crl.com that none but madmen know." Roger Louis Sinasohn & Associates San Francisco, California ------------------------------[ <- Message 21 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 941123 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 1994 21:04:47 -0800 From: Roger Sinasohn <sinasohn@crl.com> Subject: Re: Back-issue LR sighting So I guess Paul & Linda should be added to the Celeb_Rovers list... --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Uncle Roger "There is pleasure pure in being mad sinasohn@crl.com that none but madmen know." Roger Louis Sinasohn & Associates San Francisco, California ------------------------------[ <- Message 22 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 941123 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 94 21:47:15 PST From: Brad Krohn <Brad_Krohn@ccm2.hf.intel.com> Subject: Glossary and hooters Text item: Text_1 Michael writes: >One I'm not sure about.. some of my Triumph friends refer to the horn >as the "hooter". Indeed, when I pulled the non-functioning horn from LR, it was labeled "Clear Hooters, England." So, methinks there is something to this! I have the evidence still. ======================================================================= "ROVER? WHO DRIVES IT?" Brad_Krohn@ccm.hf.intel.com "That would be telling." -The Prisoner '69 IIA 88" Bug-Eye ======================================================================= ------------------------------[ <- Message 23 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 941123 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: NAVIGATOR2@aol.com Date: Wed, 23 Nov 1994 01:33:52 -0500 Subject: Land Rover newsletter I would like to subscribe to your online newsletter. Address: NAVIGATOR2@aol.com. Thanx ; ) ------------------------------[ <- Message 24 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 941123 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: LANDROVER@delphi.com Date: Wed, 23 Nov 1994 02:43:36 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: Glossary and hooters Hey Brad...did ya see them Hooters?? > Michael writes: > >One I'm not sure about.. some of my Triumph friends refer to the horn [ truncated by lro-digester (was 9 lines)] > "Clear Hooters, England." So, methinks there is something to this! I > have the evidence still. Indeed! and True!! The workshop manual even has a section devoted to adjustment of the horns. One section for "Lucas" and one section for "Clear Hooters". Hey Maloney... does this mean we can talk about Hooters and be on topic?? Cheers Michael Loiodice E-MAIL landrover@delphi.com 166 W.Fulton St. VOICE (518) 773-2697 Gloversville NY, 12078 1972 Ser III 88 Petrol (Fern) 1971 Ser IIa 88 Petrol 1965 Ser IIa 88 Petrol ------------------------------[ <- Message 25 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 941123 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
END OF LAND ROVER OWNER DIGEST[ First Message | Table of Contents | <- Digest 941123 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Back | Forward | |
---|---|---|
Photos & text Copyright 1990-2011 Bill Caloccia, All rights reserved. Digest Messages Copyright 1990-2011 by the original poster or/and Bill Caloccia, All rights reserved.
|