[ First Message Last | Table of Contents | <- Digest -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
msg | Sender | lines | Subject |
1 | azw@aber.ac.uk (Andy Woo | 42 | Military LR chassis underseal |
2 | azw@aber.ac.uk (Andy Woo | 26 | Re: D-90 only does 90 |
3 | maloney@wings.attmail.co | 45 | HOOTERS & TOOTERS |
4 | ccray@lulu.cc.missouri.e | 66 | all's well that end's well |
5 | "Stefan R. Jacob" [10004 | 69 | Re: 235/85R16 tires on a RR |
6 | "TeriAnn Wakeman" [twak | 18 | Re: Let's build a glossary |
7 | MacWay@aol.com | 7 | j |
8 | Mike Rooth [M.J.Rooth@lu | 22 | Re: Let's build a glossary |
9 | dkenner@emr.ca (Dixon Ke | 14 | Re: Let's build a glossary |
10 | Brian_Foster_at_ASTISHR@ | 68 | RE:BMW Diesel |
11 | "Russell G. Dushin" [dus | 44 | RE: list complaints |
12 | mtalbot@interserv.com | 16 | [not specified] |
13 | William.Grouell@Eng.Sun. | 17 | Flywheel |
14 | "Russell G. Dushin" [dus | 21 | Re: dirty flywheel |
15 | brabyn@skivs.ski.org (Jo | 9 | RE: list complaints |
16 | mtalbot@interserv.com | 53 | Returned mail: Host unknown |
17 | Jon Humphrey [jh5r+@andr | 25 | Re: list complaints |
18 | Russell Burns [burns@cis | 56 | R-rover camping |
19 | "Russell G. Dushin" [dus | 40 | Re: Re[2]: list complaints |
20 | Brad Krohn [Brad_Krohn@c | 38 | Parts from UK |
21 | rhcaldw@nma.mnet.uswest. | 22 | Waving |
22 | brabyn@skivs.ski.org (Jo | 13 | Thanksgiving Wave |
23 | dixon@fourfold.ocunix.on | 17 | [not specified] |
24 | dixon@fourfold.ocunix.on | 21 | [not specified] |
25 | "Jurgen Klus" [PSJK@psy1 | 14 | Discovery Discs |
26 | "Stephen O'Hearn" [72700 | 40 | Defender 90 Top Speed / Hard Top |
27 | Brian_Foster_at_ASTISHR@ | 23 | 72 Series III for sale |
28 | rhcaldw@nma.mnet.uswest. | 29 | John Benham |
29 | "Ryan K. Haaland" [haala | 11 | quick question |
From: azw@aber.ac.uk (Andy Woodward) Subject: Military LR chassis underseal Date: Wed, 23 Nov 1994 09:25:13 UNDEFINED .I have previously owned 3 ex-military Land Rovers, all of which had the .thick underseal applied to their chassis. I found that as it aged, it .tended to lift away from the metal underneath and retain water against .the metal all the time. This is a serious problem here on the island .because of the ubiquitous salt spray (and the odd boat launching). While .I was rebuilding my last Series III, I had the chassis shot blasted to .remove all traces of underseal and rust. This cost me about 20 pounds at .a Glasgow metal finishers. After a bit of hole patching, I then enlarged .all the drain holes in the bottom of the chassis rails and drilled new .ones in the closed bits, e.g the bulkhead outriggers. .Following numerous coats of Hammerite paint, I poured about a gallon of .Waxoyl diluted with white spirit down the inside of each chassis rail .and turned it over a few times to coat all the walls (strong assistants .recommended!) .I don't know if you will need to use such drastic measures, but I would .certainly advise removing the underseal. The rebuilt rover lived on the .island for seven years until I sold it a few months ago without any .chassis corrosion problems. This is a universal problem with underseal. THE STUFF IS POISON!! NEVER EVER underseal a vehicle if you plan on keepping it a long time, adn if it is already undersealed. strip it. Or at teh very minimum, wirebrush it with nails adn wax all the bits that fall off - repeat at regular intervals. Waxoyl, old gear oil, etc work fine. But underseal is a cosmetic layer to fool new car buyers that dont know better into thinking their new pride adn joy will last. (It usually does last the couple of years till they sell it,, then the poor sod that buys secondhand watches his floorpan fall apart under him........) I'm astonished at the military using underseal. +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Just another roadkill on the Information Superhighway +++++++++++++++++++++++ None-%er #1 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ------------------------------[ <- Message 2 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 941124 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: azw@aber.ac.uk (Andy Woodward) Subject: Re: D-90 only does 90 Date: Wed, 23 Nov 1994 09:31:05 UNDEFINED . I found out that I can`t keep up with the 100MPH traffic in the .left lane. The 90 cuts off at 90 MPH. The R-Rover will only do .98 with the roof rack on so I guess its not too bad..... Life's so hard. My 90 has a hard time getting over 60mph. My heart bleeds for you. .So far I am ave about 16 MPG at 70mph. But I get 30mpg at 50mph. Mpg at 70mph is nobbut a pipedream...... (ps, it would do 80mph on teh old standard Avon Traction Mileage 6.50x16 Xplies, but teh 205x16 radials really slug it - but also they last 3 times as long, cost teh same adn dont affect the fuel consumption) +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Just another roadkill on the Information Superhighway +++++++++++++++++++++++ None-%er #1 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ------------------------------[ <- Message 3 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 941124 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 1994 09:28:23 -0500 From: maloney@wings.attmail.com (maloney) Subject: HOOTERS & TOOTERS Mike Lokodice writeth: none Indeed! and True!! The workshop manual even has a section devoted to adjustment of the horns. One section for "Lucas" and one section for "Clear Hooters". Hey Maloney... does this mean we can talk about Hooters and be on topic?? "Clear Hooters, England." So, methinks there is something to this! I have the evidence still. none Why of course it is, my fine furry friend. The Hooter on my 88 also said "Clear Hooters, England", but couldn't blow worth a hoot. The hooter on my 109 couldn't toot either, but said Lucas something- no surprises there. I replaced the Hooters on both my Rovers with Fiamm dual electrics- not the air horn type. They are plenty loud and have a businesslike, european sound - pretty neat. I've found air horns to plug up with ice in bad weather and go from BLAAAA!!! to wheeeeezzzzz! But the Hooter I like best (OK, second best) is my official JC Whitney Moo Horn under the hood of my 88. It wasn't cheap at $40+, but for grin factor - it's great (it's also large too, if like big hooters). One electrical connection, one manual cable, 2 brackets, adjust the cable for effect (this regulates the sound) and it's in. Stop on the roadside beside a field full of cows and give it a bellow - they ALL turn and look at the same time. Maybe I'm easily amused, but this is really a scream. Works on humans too. I have to admit... it's really a HOOT! Oh, Mike, next time we meet I'll show you a photo of your's truly and Chesty Love (Yes, THE Chesty Love) a friend bought for me at a rather memorable birthday outing a few years ago. Now THOSE were HOO(Ooops! we'd better continue this one off line :-) ).... Baloney w/stuffing... gobble gobble (it's a US thing, Uncle Mike R, ya know, the pilgrims escaping your ancestors the Royal Opressors & such... oh, never mind) maloney@wings.attmail.com ------------------------------[ <- Message 4 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 941124 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: ccray@lulu.cc.missouri.edu Subject: all's well that end's well Date: Wed, 23 Nov 1994 09:28:43 -0600 (CST) About 2 weeks ago, we went thru the fall ritual of putting antifreeze in LULU. With the tall 16" tires it was so easy. Crawl under and open the drain valve on the engine block and radiator and let `em drain. Hey, don't get alarmed, environmentalists -- LULU lost all her antifreeze out in UTAH and I was draining water. Topped things off with 1-1/2 US gallons of antifreeze with water. Thats when the trouble hit. On the way home whilst cruising down the concrete, BLAM -- steam fuming out from under the bonnet. Cruised into a gas station that happened to be close by and cool-ed things down with the water hose. The Radiator neck apparatus had separated from the radiator top where the solder had failed. Mumble, grumble. More work that I didn't want to take on. Rode to work with the wife for a week while pondering the repair job. On Saturday last, I checked things out. Looked at the repair manual and even started the task of taking the radiator out. But wait, it wasn't leaking and taking radiators out for exercise wasn't my idea of fun. What if the radiator shop could fix it while in the car? That was enough for me to put Saturday's job onto hold. Called the radiator shop and they wouldn't commit but could probably do the work "in-situ". Would have to look at it. "What kind of car is it?" "What?" Couldn't get to it till Wed morning, but that was ok. Went by this morning and watched the man do his thing. LULU was parked on an incline with the front up, so I didn't even have to drain things down. With a propane torch, he heated both the radiator top and removed all the solder that was there -- some paint, too. And he removed the solder that was on the neck piece. Sprayed on a little flux (I guess), put a weight on top, and soldered that sucker right in. Took about 30 seconds for things to cool down and on went the radiator cap. I re-attached the galvanized grill with the LR badge -- thats all the further I had gotten on Saturday. Went into the shop -- the man had already started on another job. "Great job, write up the ticket", I said. "No problem, catch you later", he said. "NO, that was worth something to me -- I didn't have to take that radiator out and put it back in", says I. "Catch you later", he said. Made me feel good -- the small town courtesy, the thanksgiving season, the crisp autumn air, LULU running again. I guess all's well that end's well. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Ray Harder Columbia, Missouri 314-882-2000 "...you are what you drive..." - 61 SIIa 88 (LULU, aka Experimental) - 66 SIIa 88 (rebuild project) - 69 SIIa 88 (parts) - 87 RR (wife's) - 80 MGB - xx --------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------[ <- Message 5 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 941124 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: 23 Nov 94 10:19:54 EST From: "Stefan R. Jacob" <100043.2400@compuserve.com> Subject: Re: 235/85R16 tires on a RR John Brabyn enquired: > Sounds great Stephan!! What is the outside diameter of those tires? I thought > the stock 205 R16's had a cross section figure of 85 too (ie 205-85-R16) > which should only make the new tires about 2 inches bigger in diameter, or > 1 inch in radius. Is this not really the case? It seems like the outside > ... I confess not being a great tire guru (or a guru on anything for that matter), I'm just the kind who likes experimenting - and sometimes it even works! For the diameter question may I refer you to the observations of Steve Methley who stated: > For the person who asked about diameters: 80% is the standard aspect > ratio for radials and is often unstated eg 205R16. The diameter is > then 28.9 inches. For 235/85R16 it is 31.7 inches, ie an increase in > diff clearance of 1.4 inches. You could run 7.50x16 crossplys (which > ... Let's suppose he's right. (John Brabyn:) > I must say I like the sound of the improved performance off-road. How > much noise do you get at freeway speeds? To my own surprise, on the freeway they're not noisy at all (at least not now while they're still new); it's at slow speeds that you percieve a slight "grumble". > Also, how much ground clearance do you now get under the diffs? I have measured 23 cm (9.05") under the diffs, 35 cm (13.78") under the front spoiler and 40 cm (15.75") under the outer lower body edge (footwell?). Hedgehogs will be happy (unless they get in the way of those 235's). Steve Methley further observed: > 235 tires are 9.25 inches wide - what rims do you run? Ideally the > rim should be no more than 2 inches smaller. This is why LR don't > ... <snip> ... The regular (I think they're regular?) alloy rims on my 87' RR are exactly 7 inches wide. That would make them *just* about wide enough for 235/85-ers. I grant that handling in curves is less than satisfying, but frankly I couldn't give a fart (s'cuze me...) and anyway, as a 109 driver of many years I do, as of principle, expect others to respect the laws of nature, physics and common sense and simply steer clear of my 2 tons of steel w/aluminum. > BTW, what do you think jacking the RR does to the working drivetrain > joint angles? Well, I'll tell you ... I don't know :-/ Suppose we just wait and see. If anything happens in the near future I'll let the net know for sure. Then again propshaft joints are so cheap, the heck if I have to replace them every two years or so. Just so as not to give anyone a wrong idea let me reiterate the caveat of my original post: If you see your RR primarily as a street vehicle (nothing against that), fitting the RR with that sort of tires is ... would you believe ... baloney? <gdr> Rumbling along, Stefan <Stefan R. Jacob, 100043.2400@CompuServe.com> ------------------------------[ <- Message 6 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 941124 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 94 08:13:35 -0800 From: "TeriAnn Wakeman" <twakeman@apple.com> Subject: Re: Let's build a glossary The classic definition of a roadster is a model of a car that does not come with a fixed hard top and has removable side windows (side curtains) instead of roll down windows. So by definition the two door Land Rovers with optional hard tops, or hoods (soft top) and side curtains (those removable side windows) are classic British roadsters. Also, don't forget the Land Rover has two prop shafts, except for a very limited number designed for the military that were designed to float. The have a third prop shaft that has a propeller at the end. TeriAnn Wakeman Large format photographers look at the world twakeman@apple.com upside down and backwards ------------------------------[ <- Message 7 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 941124 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: MacWay@aol.com Date: Wed, 23 Nov 1994 12:05:06 -0500 Subject: j unsubscribe ------------------------------[ <- Message 8 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 941124 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Mike Rooth <M.J.Rooth@lut.ac.uk> Subject: Re: Let's build a glossary Date: Wed, 23 Nov 94 17:07:03 GMT > The classic definition of a roadster is a model of a car that does not come with > a fixed hard top and has removable side windows (side curtains) instead of roll [ truncated by lro-digester (was 17 lines)] > TeriAnn Wakeman Large format photographers look at the world > twakeman@apple.com upside down and backwards Ah,sorry Teriann,but the term "Roadster" isnt English,its American.The Triumph TR1 was called the Triumph Roadster(it had wind down windows???) What you are describing we called a Sports Car,or Open Tourer.The side curtains were "Side Screens". Also,I think you'll find that the APGP Land Rover with the big rubber flaots had only two prop shafts.The rear shaft had a propeller along its length somewhere. come to think of it Riley also produced a "Roadster".Called the 100hp Roadster.Lovely beast,and very rare now. Cheers Mike Rooth ------------------------------[ <- Message 9 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 941124 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: dkenner@emr.ca (Dixon Kenner) Subject: Re: Let's build a glossary Date: Wed, 23 Nov 1994 12:13:55 -0500 (EST) > British roadsters. Also, don't forget the Land Rover has two prop shafts, > except for a very limited number designed for the military that were designed to > float. The have a third prop shaft that has a propeller at the end. Actually there was a military version that only had one prop shaft. They cheaped out and did not want four wheel drive. Rgds, ------------------------------[ <- Message 10 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 941124 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Brian_Foster_at_ASTISHR@ccmailsmtp.ast.com Date: Wed, 23 Nov 94 10:03:52 PST Subject: RE:BMW Diesel In reply to Andrew Steele <ad158@DAYTON.WRIGHT.EDU> Tue, 22 Nov 1994: > Ok, correct me if I'm wrong, but hasn't there been discussion about > the BMW 5 cylinder diesel being both US emission approved and a > bolt in replacement for RR? I posted this to the BMW net & inquired at BMW NA and yes the Diesel is approved for the US despite its not being used. However, nobody could comment about whether it fit into the LR or not. The Diesel you mentioned was offered in the 5-series for quite awile, but was never a big seller. I beleive there are plans to put it back into the marketplace soon. As for your trip to the BMW dealer, I hope that they die a quick, painful death just like the local Newport Imports LR dealer died. Orange County benefitted by getting a LR only dealer in Mission Viejo run by true enthusiasts that have been more help than this list (don't worry - i'll get to it). I am sorry that you had a bad experience at a BMW dealership Andrew since BMW NA is really cracking down on this high-hype, yuppy-targeting sales attitude. I know 'cuz I ran into a similar experience in snob central of So. Calif. -- Newport Beach. It didn't matter if I drove the Vette in, or the BMW, I was treated poorly. A subsequent complaint in a chapter newsletter I published got a telecon with a sales director from Boston (BMW NA) to find out what could have been done to change the dealership for future sales. See, BMW is coming out with their compact and needs to readjust to the VW/Camry/Accord crowd in addition to the heavy rollers. Buyers are more informed today than ever before. Your best place to ask the question, however, is with an enthusiasts group like this list. There are quality dealerships around that have knowledgeable sales people around. Don't let this one experience taint you. As for the enthusiasts, I don't think you'll find a better crowd. There is no discrimination between model owners (occasionally a round taillight vs square discussion pops up or a 320i vs. 2002 but they are fun...) and I have never seen anyone attacked for simple questions from how to loosen a hex nut to what kind of snow tires to buy for the 100th time. Which brings me to my anger vented to the list. As a RR owner, I think it is sad that there are so many elitist attitudes against Disco and RR owners on this list -- we are LR owners as well. A LR is different than anything else on the road, and the owners of such vehicles are to be commended no matter the model! Secondly, two pleas to the list for help on how to get subscriptions to the publications mentioned (slow delivery or not) has yielded some information, but not enough to help either Brian or I to succeed, so I went to the aforementioned LR dealer and inquired. They not only had the addresses, they were willing to set me up with the subscriptions and handle the pound-to-dollar conversion on my behalf. I hope they can do the same for Brian (or someone on this list who remembers how they got their subscriptions can help in *detail* how to subscribe). When I asked about eqpt to carry in my RR for off-road trips, 1 out of 2 answers were insults that I merely deleted. I realy want to commend, however, the helpful people in Northern California... I'll get off my soapbox now. I regret to a degree the negative things that I have said because it is a time for giving thanks, but they've been burning for awhile. I really do wish everyone on the list that get to enjoy Thanksgiving a happy & safe holiday. The RR and I, well, we are going to go get the BMW and do a little racing this weekend... Brian ------------------------------[ <- Message 11 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 941124 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Russell G. Dushin" <dushinrg@pr.cyanamid.com> Subject: RE: list complaints Date: Wed, 23 Nov 94 15:07:40 EST We have an unhappy subscriber on our hands- > Which brings me to my anger vented to the list. As a RR owner, I > think it is sad that there are so many elitist attitudes against Disco > and RR owners on this list -- we are LR owners as well. A LR is > different than anything else on the road, and the owners of such > vehicles are to be commended no matter the model! Secondly, two pleas Sorry, but some of us just really like Series rigs. We tolerate RR stuff as we'd expect you to tolerate us. > to the list for help on how to get subscriptions to the publications > mentioned (slow delivery or not) has yielded some information, but not [ truncated by lro-digester (was 8 lines)] > do the same for Brian (or someone on this list who remembers how they > got their subscriptions can help in *detail* how to subscribe). Let us not forget that they are paid for their time. What you get here is free so quit complaining. Why not post what you found out? Don't expect us to have all your answers. > When I asked about eqpt to carry in my RR for off-road trips, 1 out of > 2 answers were insults that I merely deleted. I realy want to > commend, however, the helpful people in Northern California... > aforementioned LR dealer and inquired. They not only had the Now, I think I'm gonna get sick. > I'll get off my soapbox now. I regret to a degree the negative things > that I have said because it is a time for giving thanks, but they've [ truncated by lro-digester (was 8 lines)] > we are going to go get the BMW and do a little racing this weekend... > Brian And I, too regret having to voice my opinion on this subject, again. Series bound forever, rd/nigel (NO RR OR D90, and only 1 110 has EVER waved back) ------------------------------[ <- Message 12 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 941124 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: mtalbot@interserv.com Date: Wed, 23 Nov 1994 12:12:09 -0800 All, In the process of rebuilding my SIII ready for the spring. While the engine is ^M out I'm replacing the clutch and pressure plate. After removing the old one, I ^M noticed that the flywheel is dirty. Anyone sugest how to clean it. I know it ^M supposed to be free of oil and grease. anyone got any ideas what to use ???? I also noticed that someone on the net was looking for some wings, I have a ^M pair from my spare SIII. Let me know if you are interested. Mark ------------------------------[ <- Message 13 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 941124 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 1994 12:33:36 +0800 From: William.Grouell@Eng.Sun.COM (William L. Grouell) Subject: Flywheel > All, > In the process of rebuilding my SIII ready for the spring. While the engine is> out I'm replacing the clutch and pressure plate. After removing the old one, I> noticed that the flywheel is dirty. Anyone sugest how to clean it. I know it [ truncated by lro-digester (was 9 lines)] > pair from my spare SIII. Let me know if you are interested. > Mark Clean it with anything that works, ie; gasolene, solvent, Gunk, oven cleaner, whatever. Then sand it with 220 grit wet-or-dry and soapy water to a nice dull finish all over the "contact" area. finaly clean real good with brake parts cleaner. Or... take it to the machine shop and have it resurfaced. Regards, bill G. ------------------------------[ <- Message 14 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 941124 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Russell G. Dushin" <dushinrg@pr.cyanamid.com> Subject: Re: dirty flywheel Date: Wed, 23 Nov 94 15:41:58 EST > All, > In the process of rebuilding my SIII ready for the spring. While the engine is [ truncated by lro-digester (was 13 lines)] > pair from my spare SIII. Let me know if you are interested. > Mark Remove it and have it resurfaced at your local machine shop. If possible (many machine shops won't want to get involved....but a good brake and clutch place will so let your fingers do some walking here) get your clutch pressure plate resurfaced as well (don't attempt to dismantle it-the brake and clutch place will do it for you). The above (with fresh new clutch, a 10"er at that) did wonders for Nigel. rd/nige ------------------------------[ <- Message 15 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 941124 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 94 13:25:11 PST From: brabyn@skivs.ski.org (John Brabyn) Subject: RE: list complaints I always wave to Series Land Rovers, but they hardly ever wave back either. John Brabyn 89RR ------------------------------[ <- Message 16 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 941124 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: mtalbot@interserv.com Date: Wed, 23 Nov 1994 13:53:09 -0800 Subject: Returned mail: Host unknown I wrote last week about my adventure collecting a SIII Land Rover from ^M Vinalhaven ME. While reading a back issue of LRO, I was browsing through the "Land Rover ^M Story". This part covered Land Rovers, SIII in the US. The Vinalhaven Rover was a 71' SIII. According to the article, only 30 SIII ^M were imported during 71, guess what ? the Vinalhaven Rover was #8 imported ^M into the USA. How many of the others are around, still going or end up the ^M same way as #8. Alas, its seen better days, it's now in half, all the good bits used on my ^M SIII from Nantucket, and that one is #509. While I'm in a writing mood, nothing else to do while sitting on a plane to ^M NYC !! My rebuild of #509 is coming along great. The engine and gearbox are ^M out, chassis is all cleaned up ready for some patching, the order for parts is ^M awaiting delivery from Craddocks, hey, why pay Rovers North prices when you ^M can get EVERYTHING from England. This weekend, I stripped down all the brakes ^M ready for some new cylinders, shoes and pipes. Also, I have managed to get all the @#$% out of the rear window channels, ^M after some digging around, grinding, all the channels came out. Well, what was ^M left of them ! I replaced the dashboard from #8 which did'nthave a crack in it and fitted it ^M neatly into place, the interior looks as good as new once sprayed with ^M armour-all. Try it. Next after the patching is to get the brakes done and bleed the system. Paint ^M the chassis, and refit the gearbox ready fr the engine, and new exhasut to be ^M fitted. Trying to get as much done before winter sets in here in New ^M Hampshire. My goal is to get # 509 ready for the downeast rally in July. What condition the paint work will be in is anyones guess, after taking panels ^M from a red and blue Land Rover it will be a patchwork of colour, still after ^M reading the threads on washing LR's, perhaps it would be better to take it on ^M a mud run and don't wash it. Anyone interested in starting an parts order system, we all get toghter and ^M get parts from the UK to save on costs ??? Sorry Rovers North, but $50 for a ^M wheel cylinder is tooo much for me, when in UK they are only 12.50 pounds. ^M With my last order, I saved over $350. Mark <---- End Included Message ----> ------------------------------[ <- Message 17 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 941124 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 1994 16:57:00 -0500 (EST) From: Jon Humphrey <jh5r+@andrew.cmu.edu> Subject: Re: list complaints To All of us, HAPPY THANKSGIVING !!! I'm not going to granma's house, but I'm gonna do sumptin. And I promise to wave to everybody. PS see below PS. I was at the Moose Lodge last week and there is a girl there from England who comes in once in a while. So in my best manner I asked her what she and her friends in england thought about Land Rovers. Her reply was; "Oh, we don't think about them very much. It would be nice to have a new Range rover If you could afford it. SO anxiously I asked, "What do you think about old Land Rovers? She replyed "Oh we think about them even less, the only time we think of them is when we see them parked in some farmers field, all buried with farm Poop. I said "you mean hay don't you? She said " No I mean Poop, and I mean buried" !!! This is a true quote Have a happy one Jon ------------------------------[ <- Message 18 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 941124 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Russell Burns <burns@cisco.com> Subject: R-rover camping Date: Wed, 23 Nov 94 14:19:36 PST Forwarded message: > Which brings me to my anger vented to the list. As a RR owner, I > think it is sad that there are so many elitist attitudes against Disco [ truncated by lro-digester (was 17 lines)] > 2 answers were insults that I merely deleted. I realy want to > commend, however, the helpful people in Northern California... Lets see.. you take a leather seated $40k+ "yuppie truck" camping in the dirt, mud, and rocks. First item I consider essential is a good roof rack. That is the only place I have been able to stow my Hi-lift jack. It seems that if you get a R-Rover stuck, it is stuck. (I popped for a winch after I got stuck comming home from buger king). I also have a 6 Gallon marine gas tank which I strap to the rack. This is not only for extra fuel, but it comes in handy when your friends with slightly older rovers have fuel pump problems. I use marine quick disconnect fittings, a bulb pump, and never have to remove it from the roof (except to loan to thoes older rovers. Inside I have build a wooden storage box to replace the useless cargo cover rover supplies. the bos is the same height of the cargo cover, but only fills half the cargo space. In the other half I strap in an electric ice box, (to store all that yuppie water), and a 6 gallon water jug (to fill the older rovers radiators in utah) It seems I had to use all my K.O.A spring water to keep lulu rolling in Utah where Ray decided to start his radiator flushing. I store the following items in the storage box. 1: Jumper cables 2: set of belts 3: small white gas camp stove (for those -30F starts) 4: Winch acc kit. 5: Three days supply of food. 6: tool kit (including multi meter for fixing R-Rovers on mountian passes) 7: Oil, trans fluid, paper towels, toliet paper, tie wraps (for fixing D-90 tail pipes ripped off in mud holes, lots of tubes of sticky junk. 8:100 feet of rope 9:Tow strap All the soft junk clothes, tents, ect I stuff in portage packs and tie them on the roof. load up the wife and kid, 300 kids tapes, and books and your off Russ D-90 R-Rover. Do we wave at the older Rovers before or after we run over them....? (just kidding) I thale very few things seriously including myself --OAA27274.785629088/lint.cisco.com-- ------------------------------[ <- Message 19 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 941124 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Russell G. Dushin" <dushinrg@pr.cyanamid.com> Subject: Re: Re[2]: list complaints Date: Wed, 23 Nov 94 17:25:48 EST > > Sorry, but some of us just really like Series rigs. We tolerate > > RR stuff as we'd expect you to tolerate us. [ truncated by lro-digester (was 11 lines)] > You missed the point. RR & Disco stuff & simple questions are not > usually tolerated -- they're attacked. I'd suggest you are being a little hypersensitive (but granted, I have not read the direct replies you are referring to). I personally try not to attack unless attacked. > > Let us not forget that they are paid for their time. What you get > > here is free so quit complaining. Why not post what you found out? [ truncated by lro-digester (was 12 lines)] > Region for assistance. As for answers, I expected at least one person > to have successfully subscribed to be able to give details how they did > it (& don't have a quality LR dealer nearby). If you want me to take care of you send me a check. If you cannot look up a pound to dollar conversion and can't do the math send me two. Make them big ones. > > Now, I think I'm gonna get sick. > That's OK, your message makes me sick... > > Don't expect us to have all your answers. > Ah... but they did not get paid to "take care of it" except for OK folks, we've reached a new low. You can........... > > Series bound forever, > ^--- pretty narrow-minded You can do it again! rd/nigel ------------------------------[ <- Message 20 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 941124 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 94 15:49:29 PST From: Brad Krohn <Brad_Krohn@ccm2.hf.intel.com> Subject: Parts from UK Text item: Text_1 On a recent UK trip, I made it to several LR parts places (LRO/LRW advertisers) and all were happy to talk about orders from the US. General impressions: Merseyside's LR Supermarket is OK and you feel like a kid in a candy store getting to walk the aisles. Selection pretty good off the shelf, and prices decent - but not great. You'd probably eat up savings with the shipping, at least as it was quoted to me. Tim Fry Land Rovers in Cheltenham is truly in back of a dealership, and the shop was a hubbub of activity with all sorts of Landies and Rangies under repair. The parts counter upstairs was well-stocked and Parts Mgr. David Lane (101 Forward Control owner!) was friendly with decent prices. My vote. They also said they had a farm where they were "breaking" (glossary compilers: that's "salvaging" or "stripping") over 100 Rovers. The Bearmach branch in Builth Wells, Wales (main office: Cardiff) was tiny - friendly and their catalog has much larger pictures of some assemblies than RN or Haynes. Didn't price anything. Bottom line: I priced all of the little bits that went into my baggage (two axles of brake shoes, master cyl. rebuild kit, wheel cyl. kits, etc.) and figured I saved about $50 over Rovers North and $20-$25 over British Pacific (without shipping, in all cases). Draw your own conclusions. ======================================================================= "ROVER? WHO DRIVES IT?" Brad_Krohn@ccm.hf.intel.com "That would be telling." -The Prisoner '69 IIA 88" Bug-Eye ======================================================================= ------------------------------[ <- Message 21 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 941124 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 94 17:06:47 MST From: rhcaldw@nma.mnet.uswest.com ( ROY CALDWELL ) Subject: Waving I always wave at anything that is Rover. Even some dogs along side the road. I even have gotten waved at by VW Vans. But after having lived with one for 19 years I have a soft spot on the brain for air cooled, still. But you guys and gals should be happy you even see any on the road. My three are about the only running Rovers in over 100 sqaure miles. Last time I saw another Rover on the road was over a year ago. John come up to Montana to the rocky front and not only will I wave at you but I'll even show you my hooters. I might even get one that works to toot at you. Roy - Rovers in the Rockies You mean Rover actually built more than the three you have! ------------------------------[ <- Message 22 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 941124 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 94 16:39:21 PST From: brabyn@skivs.ski.org (John Brabyn) Subject: Thanksgiving Wave Let's cut out all this meaningless acrimonious chit-chat about the merits of different Land Rover models and the personalities of their typical owners, and have a Happy Thanksgiving Wave to everybody. Cheers John Brabyn 89RR ------------------------------[ <- Message 23 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 941124 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Subject: Re: Nigel has a bed to sleep on From: dixon@fourfold.ocunix.on.ca (dixon kenner) Date: Wed, 23 Nov 94 18:00:52 -0500 LANDROVER@delphi.com writes: > Uh... only one question... Like, where do you put the jacuzzi?? But has he uprated the springs & shocks? No wonder it hasn't been tested yet... -- dixon kenner, dixon@fourfold.ocunix.on.ca FourFold Symmetry, | Ottawa Valley Land Rovers Nepean, Ontario, Canada | 1016 Normandy Crescent, Nepean (OVLR's InterNet site) | Ontario, Canada, K2C 0L4 ------------------------------[ <- Message 24 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 941124 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Subject: Military LR chassis underseal From: dixon@fourfold.ocunix.on.ca (dixon kenner) Date: Wed, 23 Nov 94 18:03:52 -0500 "Mr T.stevenson" <gbfv08@udcf.gla.ac.uk> writes: > I have previously owned 3 ex-military Land Rovers, all of which had the > thick underseal applied to their chassis. I found that as it aged, it > tended to lift away from the metal underneath and retain water against > the metal all the time. This is a serious problem here on the island > because of the ubiquitous salt spray (and the odd boat launching). All of the ex-military stuff around here is exactly the same. Miserable stuff to get off. -- dixon kenner, dixon@fourfold.ocunix.on.ca FourFold Symmetry, | Ottawa Valley Land Rovers Nepean, Ontario, Canada | 1016 Normandy Crescent, Nepean (OVLR's InterNet site) | Ontario, Canada, K2C 0L4 ------------------------------[ <- Message 25 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 941124 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Jurgen Klus" <PSJK@psy1.ssn.flinders.edu.au> Date: Thu, 24 Nov 1994 11:22:48 GMT-0930 Subject: Discovery Discs Has anyone heard of a problem with the disc brake rotors on the Discovery warping. Three of mine have, and I'm not hard on the brakes. Is this a weakness? Do RR discs fit and would it be worth swapping? Would asbestos free pads help? What a nuisance! regards Jurgen Klus Tel 618 201 2413 Fax 618 201 3877 ------------------------------[ <- Message 26 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 941124 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: 23 Nov 94 21:18:40 EST From: "Stephen O'Hearn" <72700.3262@compuserve.com> Subject: Defender 90 Top Speed / Hard Top Russell Burns writes: > I found out that I can`t keep up with the 100MPH traffic in the > left lane. The 90 cuts off at 90 MPH. The R-Rover will only do > 98 with the roof rack on so I guess its not too bad..... and John Brabyn replies: > I recall reading somewhere that the 90 is cutout-limited to 85mph. > Maybe it's really 90 -- that would seem appropriate!! Both are correct on this piece of Rover trivia and John is very close with his value of 85mph. According to my info the Defender 90 is limited to 86mph (~138kph). The reason no doubt is to prevent the driver from entering a condition wherein hearing loss would be permanent <g>. With respect to the hard top the latest from my SoCal dealer is (brace yourself Mike) January. I was curious to note that a Defender of recent manufacture had a soft top with some Velcro-attached pads on the cage to attenuate the flapping that occurs between top and cage (but without any other improvements, i.e. better zippers or windows). A new AC setup was also noted. A smidge more passenger foot room (but cheaper controls). It seems like Land Rover listens to feedback (at least some). Looking at this shiny new vehicle I realized mine isn't new anymore. I guess it's time to go get some more mud on it! I'll be wary of those overpasses though. Stephen O'Hearn '94 Defender 90 p.s. Does anybody have a good recipe for Turkey a la Intake Manifold <g>? ------------------------------[ <- Message 27 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 941124 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Brian_Foster_at_ASTISHR@ccmailsmtp.ast.com Date: Wed, 23 Nov 94 21:12:43 PST Subject: 72 Series III for sale If I don't pick it up myself, then I believe this vehicle needs to go to an enthusiast like the ones on this list. Seen in local newspaper: 72 Series III 88 Hard Top Green/Tan Seen 4WD less than 5 times In Texas, New Mexico, or California all its life=> No rust?! No body damage, paint is fine, everything works Owned 13 years by second owner (seen lots of enclosed storage time off-and-on over these 13 years as owner travels a lot) needs rear engine seal and clutch trans rebuilt 4 years ago, new electric fuel pump and other repalcements too many to list Asking $4500 I am going to look at it tomorrow at 9AM. Since this is a work access, the only way you can reach me for more details thru Monday, November 27 is to call me at home: 714/858-4515. ------------------------------[ <- Message 28 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 941124 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 94 22:14:29 MST From: rhcaldw@nma.mnet.uswest.com ( ROY CALDWELL ) Subject: John Benham Gang sorry for this , but tried to ship this to John on the side and the e-mail address I have kept failing. John, I was just trying to joke some of the people complaining about the lack of freindly waves by other Rover drivers. Walt Swain replied and kinda thought I was serious. He mentioned an outing from the group in Spokane this past Oct. Since my 69 now has a new engine, I was thinking of someplace to go with her. Is your group planning any trips this next late spring or summer? If you are I would be interested in hearing about it. He also mrntioned your newsletter. How could I get a copy or get on the mail list? Just in case it is as simple as asking I am: Roy H. Caldwell 1530 Laurel St. Helena. MT 59601 Please let me know if a trip is being planned or already scheduled. Thanks! Roy - Rovers in the Rockies Sir, I fixed that Class III oil leak you dreamed about. ------------------------------[ <- Message 29 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 941124 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 1994 07:10:12 +0000 (WET) From: "Ryan K. Haaland" <haaland@atm.ox.ac.uk> Subject: quick question Dear LRO Digest I'm a new subscriber to Land Rover Owner digest etc. Is this the appropriate forum to advertise a LR for sale and post a 'wanted' add for a different LR. Thanks for your time. Ryan Haaland ------------------------------[ <- Message 30 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 941124 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
END OF LAND ROVER OWNER DIGEST[ First Message | Table of Contents | <- Digest 941124 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Back | Forward | |
---|---|---|
Photos & text Copyright 1990-2011 Bill Caloccia, All rights reserved. Digest Messages Copyright 1990-2011 by the original poster or/and Bill Caloccia, All rights reserved.
|