[ First Message Last | Table of Contents | <- Digest -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
msg | Sender | lines | Subject |
1 | Richard Jones [rich@apri | 23 | [not specified] |
2 | Spenny@aol.com | 22 | Re: Starter Motor;Half Baked Ideas |
3 | "Dale W. Avery" [AVERY@W | 53 | Re: The Land Rover Owner Daily Digest |
4 | hiner@mail.utexas.edu (G | 15 | RoverWeb |
5 | "TeriAnn Wakeman" [twak | 26 | Re: Starter Motor;Half Baked Ideas |
6 | "John R. Benham" [BENHAM | 30 | BBC series, `The Survivors' |
7 | "TeriAnn Wakeman" [twak | 35 | Re: Every journey is an adventure (fwd) |
8 | Jon Humphrey [jh5r+@andr | 10 | Inquiry |
9 | Jon Humphrey [jh5r+@andr | 11 | Re: Every journey is an adventure (fwd) |
10 | "Walter C. Swain" [wcswa | 35 | Re: Inquiry |
11 | "TeriAnn Wakeman" [twak | 23 | Re: Every journey is an adventure (fwd) |
12 | brabyn@skivs.ski.org (Jo | 10 | Re: Splitting LRO List |
13 | brabyn@skivs.ski.org (Jo | 22 | Re: Please send in letters to Senators re "Desert Protection Act" |
14 | William Caloccia [calocc | 39 | [not specified] |
15 | David John Place [umplac | 13 | Re: Explorer V-6 and the desert bill |
16 | "Stephen O'Hearn" [72700 | 98 | Defender 90 info request |
17 | Roger Sinasohn [sinasohn | 14 | Re: Diesel Landrovers |
18 | Roger Sinasohn [sinasohn | 19 | Re: Splitting LRO List |
19 | Roger Sinasohn [sinasohn | 39 | Re: Desert Protection |
Subject: Re: Range Rover springs Date: Fri, 23 Sep 1994 09:32:08 +0100 (BST) From: Richard Jones <rich@apricot.co.uk> Russell Burns writes: > might keep the truck from bottoming out on the ledges. > Any recommendations ??? There are heavy duty springs available spacifically for Range Rover - they were originally introduced for Police vehicles, (which tend to be loaded to the roof and then thrown around at high speed). I can dig out the part numbers next time I'm at home if required. Regards Rich -- _ __ Apricot Computer Limited Tel: (+44) 21 717 7171 ' ) ) / 3500 Parkside Fax: (+44) 21 717 0123 /--' o _. /_ Birmingham Business Park / \_<_(__/ <_ BIRMINGHAM B37 7YS Email: richardj@apricot.co.uk Richard Jones United Kingdom ..!uknet!apricot!richardj ------------------------------[ <- Message 2 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 940924 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Spenny@aol.com Date: Fri, 23 Sep 94 09:18:05 EDT Subject: Re: Starter Motor;Half Baked Ideas Ben Smith writes: Let's put it in the oven for awhile. This seemed like a half baked idea to me. We put it in the oven, on bake at 190 degrees F for an hour or so. After it cooled I put it together. And it works!?! Ben, How many miles cooking on the manifold would that be? ;-) Spenny Spencer K. C. Norcross Spenny@aol.com Haverhill, Mass. USA ===---===---===---===---===---===---===---===---===---=== 1969 IIA SWB Bugeye - The Wayback Machine Land Rovers on the Information Superhighway! What will they think of next! ------------------------------[ <- Message 3 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 940924 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Dale W. Avery" <AVERY@WFOCLAN.USBM.GOV> Date: Fri, 23 Sep 1994 07:30:57 +1100 Subject: Re: The Land Rover Owner Daily Digest TO: Grandville Pool mcdpw@pacific. pacific. net FROM: Dale Avery avery@usbm.wfoclan.gov Subject: California Desert issue I hope that you will accept several comments from a LR owner "Wannabe". The major threat to ALL our resources is overpopulation. It's the "Pee in the Pool" syndrome...you know, if one little kid is playing in the swimming pool and pees in it, it's doubtful that anyone will ever notice. The volume of water is such that the offending liquids will be diluted to a non-threatening status. However, if you have 500 kids peeing in the pool, the problem will become noticiable very rapidly. I have been fortunate in my career to spend many hours off-road in the Western U.S. The impacts on the environment over that time are becoming increasingly noticiable. It's not that people are messier. Indeed our forefathers were real pigs when it came to their activities "outback". It's just that there are now so many of us enjoying 4-wheeling, camping, et al, that the country side is getting literally stomped on. By the way, I am very interested in your research on dropping a V-6, in-line 4, or V-8 into a LR. There is nothing quite so pathetic as an 88 or 109 going uphill on a two lane mountain road. It gets, and deserves, as many derisive gestures as a Winnebargo! I am looking for a LR project vehicle for my soon-to-be 16 y.o. son and myself to work on and enjoy. We are very much into off-roading in E. Washington, N. Idaho, and W. Montana. A good Friend, John Benham, took us on a local LR trip with several local LR owners. It was great. I enjoy mixing off-road with flyfishing. My son and I spent two weeks this past summer fishing Rock Creek, the Big Hole, Wise, Boulder, Smith, and Clark Fork rivers in MT. It would be fun to try this again next year in a 109...if I can find one. If you know of a Series IIA or III for sale (at an affordable price, of course!) in either the 88 or 109 wheelbase, please let me know. One final thing, I believe you made a comment about auto trans and off-roading. My experience has been that a vehicle in the mountains is MUCH better off with a manual transmission for one reason. When driving down-hill, down-slope, whatever, a stick in granny low is much safer than having to ride an automatic and the brake pedal. If you don't drive much in the mountains, this shouldn't be a problem. Cheerio from the Wannabe....Dale ------------------------------[ <- Message 4 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 940924 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 1994 10:18:39 -0600 From: hiner@mail.utexas.edu (Greg Hiner) Subject: RoverWeb As a final notice I would like to inform everybody that RoverWeb is no longer at http://whitman.gar.utexas.edu:1500. It is now at http://whitman.gar.utexas.edu/roverweb/roverweb.html. This move was made about two months ago and I retained a pointer at the old address to the new address. I shut that pointer down today so I thought I would announce this one more time. Best- Greg ------------------------------[ <- Message 5 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 940924 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 94 08:54:28 -0700 From: "TeriAnn Wakeman" <twakeman@apple.com> Subject: Re: Starter Motor;Half Baked Ideas In message <199409230526.AA163587968@envy.ugcs.caltech.edu> writes: > seemed like a half baked idea to me. We put it in the oven, on > bake at 190 degrees F for an hour or so. After it cooled I put [ truncated by lro-digester (was 11 lines)] > ranger@ugcs.caltech.edu > 1972 Land Rover Series III 88 You should have soaked the armature in varnish. You evidently have a failing insulation system. If you revarnish it chances are you will repair it. As is, it will probably short again when it gets wet. Maybe perminatly. You should have gotten you Mom into the act. She probably would have told you it needed basting. Maybe a nice honey glaze with slices of pinapple and whole cloves.... TeriAnn Wakeman Large format photographers look at the world twakeman@apple.com upside down and backwards LINK: TWAKEMAN 408-974-2344 TR3A - TS75519L, MGBGT - GHD4U149572G, Land Rover 109 - 164000561 ------------------------------[ <- Message 6 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 940924 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "John R. Benham" <BENHAM@WFOCLAN.USBM.GOV> Date: Fri, 23 Sep 1994 08:46:40 +1100 Subject: BBC series, `The Survivors' Dear LRO's, BBC produced a series in 1975 called `The Survivors'. The first six or seven hourly episodes of 38 featured all sorts of action with Land and Range Rovers. I became hooked to the series and taped all except the 1st one! Does anyone here at LRONET happen to have that 1st episode I could borrow to copy? Also, I'm against splitting up the digest to cater to each vehicle type. People who own two or three model types of Rovers would be disadvantaged. And relating to the Desert Protection Act, I have found from personal experience that the Desert Tortoise makes an excellent support to change flat tires! Sincerely, John R. Benham - Editor N.3616 Dowdy Road `The Rover Runner' Spokane, WA 99204 USA ______ |______\_____ 1968 88 IIA Marine Blue *--- [|_/-\____/-\_|} The `BWANA' Mobile *--- (O) (O) 509.747.0692 (H); 509.353.2700 (W); E- Mail: benham@wfoclan.usbm.gov ------------------------------[ <- Message 7 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 940924 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 94 09:20:10 -0700 From: "TeriAnn Wakeman" <twakeman@apple.com> Subject: Re: Every journey is an adventure (fwd) In message <Pine.3.89.9409222207.A23409-0100000@netcom8> Fred Heald writes: > Conclusion: > If you lose your keys, old Land Rovers are great because you can hot wire [ truncated by lro-digester (was 11 lines)] > good because in a new car if things break you wouldn't be able to > field-repair them... > Nyah. The conclusion is, don't lose your keys. For those of you who do not want to disassemble your instrument pannel, always carry a clip lead with insulation covered clips at each end. Just put a jumper from one fuse to the other. One fuse handles the circuits not connected to the ignition switch (always hot) and the other fuse handles the stuff downstream of the ignition switch. So the jumper would be in parallel with the ignition switch. only takes a second or two after you have poped the bonnet.... Which is why I keep a lock on my bonnet. Conclusion... Hope someone that knows Land Rovers doesn't decide they want your car more than you do. About you broken oil line. Generally you can make an emergency repair by bending a section back on itself and wraping a little tape around the two sections to keep them together. The crease at the bend should significantly slow the hemoraging to a very small amount or stop it. TeriAnn Wakeman Large format photographers look at the world twakeman@apple.com upside down and backwards LINK: TWAKEMAN 408-974-2344 TR3A - TS75519L, MGBGT - GHD4U149572G, Land Rover 109 - 164000561 ------------------------------[ <- Message 8 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 940924 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 1994 12:39:07 -0400 (EDT) From: Jon Humphrey <jh5r+@andrew.cmu.edu> Subject: Inquiry >From: alex@adoc.xerox.com (Alex Bronstein) >>Subject: CA law on buying out-of-state used cars? [ truncated by lro-digester (was 20 lines)] >>alex@adoc.xerox.com 1-415-813-6979 >>---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------[ <- Message 9 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 940924 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 1994 13:17:47 -0400 (EDT) From: Jon Humphrey <jh5r+@andrew.cmu.edu> Subject: Re: Every journey is an adventure (fwd) TeriAnn, whatever happened to your engine when you were concerned about some guy messing about? I think your last words were I hope it isn't so Later Jon ------------------------------[ <- Message 10 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 940924 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Walter C. Swain" <wcswain@qvarsx.er.usgs.gov> Subject: Re: Inquiry Date: Fri, 23 Sep 1994 11:41:57 -0700 (PDT) >From: alex@adoc.xerox.com (Alex Bronstein) >Subject: CA law on buying out-of-state used cars? [ truncated by lro-digester (was 21 lines)] >alex@adoc.xerox.com 1-415-813-6979 >---------------------------------------------------------------------------- I think a number of us have asked that question at various times. This is what I learned when I posed the relevant questions at the DMV in Davis last July. (Calling DMV never seems to be as satisfactory (if that word can be used in this context) as a personal visit during their slow times). 1. 1966 vehicles and younger must be smogged. When bringing a vehicle in from out of state, there may be special rules about limits on the amount you are required to spend. They were a little vague about that. 2. Vehicles from 1975 and younger not equipped with the California emission control devices sticker (as opposed to the actual devices themselves) are subject to a $300 emissions offset fee (don't ask how that works to offset the emissions--you probably wouldn't like the answer). 3. 1965 and older vehicles are not required to be smogged. Be prepared to provide adequate documentation that the vehicle is what it is represented to be. 4. Diesels are not smogged in California at the present time. This is expected to change as standards are developed and implemented. Good Luck > Walt Swain ------------------------------[ <- Message 11 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 940924 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 94 11:42:02 -0700 From: "TeriAnn Wakeman" <twakeman@apple.com> Subject: Re: Every journey is an adventure (fwd) In message <AiUkqvu00iVDI4wlNy@andrew.cmu.edu> Jon Humphrey writes: > TeriAnn, whatever happened to your engine when you were concerned about > some guy messing about? [ truncated by lro-digester (was 6 lines)] > Later > Jon Still unknown. Brad (editor of aluminum Workhorse fame) is interested & wants to be there when the pan is pulled. He hasn't dropped by yet. On the other hane the layshaft was a clean break and the gears were still all good. TeriAnn Wakeman Large format photographers look at the world twakeman@apple.com upside down and backwards LINK: TWAKEMAN 408-974-2344 TR3A - TS75519L, MGBGT - GHD4U149572G, Land Rover 109 - 164000561 ------------------------------[ <- Message 12 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 940924 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 94 14:34:33 PDT From: brabyn@skivs.ski.org (John Brabyn) Subject: Re: Splitting LRO List Hear Hear!! (that is -- don't split it up!) John Brabyn ------------------------------[ <- Message 13 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 940924 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 94 14:48:56 PDT From: brabyn@skivs.ski.org (John Brabyn) Subject: Re: Please send in letters to Senators re "Desert Protection Act" Thanks for the various responses to thius issue -- it is good that folks care about it about it. I apologize for sounding a little strident -- and it's good to present both sides of the coin. Personally, I am all in favor of protecting the desert, but also want to protect our access to it in a responsible way, and question whether the present bill does either. Each should vote his own conscience of course, and I think we all agree on the ends that are desirable, but there are different means. Many thanks once again, and I hope I didn't offend anyone. Cheers John Brabyn Mill Valley California 89RR ------------------------------[ <- Message 14 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 940924 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Subject: Explorer V-6 and the desert bill Date: Fri, 23 Sep 94 19:53:20 -0400 From: William Caloccia <caloccia@sw.stratus.com> The desert bill - Yes it is good to protect and prevent from development or destruction wild lands. [Not to mention that I think living anywhere that has no insufficient local water resources is a bad idea (eg. S.Calif.) However, I don't think that they ought to be too over zealous about it and close down access to the established roads and trails ( a number of them historic ). There's got to be a way to allow wilderness off-road access permits, even if it is limited or by application - like the more remote back-country cmaping areas of the of national parks <haleakela,yosemite, acadia, etc.etc.) [and I don't think they ought to add more pavement either...] Granville: as for the Ford V-6, I recall that there was a nasty vibration problem during the first year of production somewhere about 2400rpm (and I think it was engine speed related, not some function of drive train revolutions) It was particularly nasty with autos, but also present in manuals (though to a lesser degreee). Ford either had a recall or quiet fix on it, but I don't recall hearing 'bout it after the first year... so if you're buying used, beware. I very much doubt that the power plant would be imported (that isn't to say the design wouldn't be, like that pervasive 2.2L pinto/stang turbo t-bird/svo/merkur engine was of the german designed capri). I had though that the explorer 6 was out of the modular engine line, (which I want to say is in lavoina, mich) It's not that I'm a Ford man :-) but I almost grock the Ford part numbering system [e5ry-] and can recite my (former) Mustang's VIN from memory (1fabp42eohf248901) and can pretty much decode it. [ford us-*-pass.body-mustang hatch-high output v-8-1987-ford-serial] (* I think the 'b' is for the restraint system - belts, active) -B ------------------------------[ <- Message 15 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 940924 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 1994 20:21:05 -0500 (CDT) From: David John Place <umplace@CC.UManitoba.CA> Subject: Re: Explorer V-6 and the desert bill About the Explorer V-6. I had one in my 1991 Explorer, and it was called in and the heads were replaced. Seems there was a casting problem with the heads, and they allowed the anti-freeze to enter the combustion chamber and be burned. I a Ford dealer had two complaints from a customer about anti-freeze going down and they couldn't find it with pressure test etc, the heads came off and were replaced. I thik the later V6 is OK since my Aerostar electronic 4x4 has the same engine and there is no problem with it. Dave VE4PN ------------------------------[ <- Message 16 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 940924 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: 23 Sep 94 22:05:41 EDT From: "Stephen O'Hearn" <72700.3262@compuserve.com> Subject: Defender 90 info request I have a '94 Defender 90 so here goes: > How is it going? So far so good although I do have two small engine oil leaks which I am taking care of myself, I had a LR oil filter with a bad crimp which took two tries to get replaced (first time they wiped it off, inexcusable), and I've had a problem with the parking brake which when adjusted to spec apparently results in the pads or shoes contacting the rotating drum intermitently (at least this is the diagnosis, a few days will tell; supposedly the trick is to adjust it looser and this, according to the LR mechanic can apply to Discovery's as well). This last item was one of those problems which was difficult to demonstrate to the dealer and it involved two trips and the service manager driving it home (commendable). This has started a LOVE/hate relationship (emphasis intentional) unless it's fixed <g>. > What to look for? Not sure what to say other than to check and see if the "safari cage" looks to be properly installed. Most likely it is but supposedly no instructions are included for the mechanic. I suspect spacers are supposed to be used on the four upper bolts at each top corner to prevent the bolt from piercing the rubber coating on the opposite side. I know this first hand but nothing a little RTV couldn't fix quite nicely. This brings up something else to look for if possible: a good dealer. Mine is a combined Mercedes- Land Rover dealer with emphasis about 80/20 biased to MBZ. > How much did you pay? Too much. I paid retail but Defender's can be had for a little less. The big price factor is Uncle Sam as I believe the two-door SUV 25% tarrif applies. But then again a HUMMER is not worth $45,000 either. Is the Defender worth its price? Yes. But only if it's a Defender that you need or want. > How is it equiped? I'll admit to getting everything except the kitchen sink (although it may be in there somewhere <g>). In truth I got the dealer installed options I thought were useful as well as a couple that I considered marginally useful. You can decide which ones fall into the latter category: "safari cage"/soft top/side windows, A/C (I live in So. Cal.), mud flaps, winch, brush bar, side bars, tail light protectors (yeah, I used to make jokes about them), wheel locks and LoJack (I live in L.A.). I drew the line at the spare tire cover and Camel Trophy brushed aluminum fender protectors. > What equipment is recommended? Ah! I'd definitely recommend the soft top but the rest depends on your needs and wants. I recommend you NOT get the spare tire cover. It looks real tacky <g>. > How is servicing? Service so far has been warranty except for one oil change which was around $60. Expensive compared to Jiffy-Lube etc. The service staff at my dealer is very professional, polite, cooperative, and understanding (MBZ rubs off?). Their response to the difficult parking brake problem has been very gratifying (hopefully it's fixed; there should be a smiley for fingers crossed <g>). My only complaint is with their mechanic who seems to know his stuff but... (I discovered today he is paid on commission and is apparently the only LR mechanic there.) > I am wondering how the heaters are,... Don't know. If you can wait a few months I'll let you know (and I don't mean an L.A. winter, I mean 10's and 20's). > and how they behave in fairly deep snow (1 to 2 feet is sometimes > common up the four-wheel-drive road to my house). Ditto. But given a 9.5" ground clearance below the differentials I can't imagine 1 ft. being a problem. If the Mud T/A's can get a grip it should be smooth sailing. As for 2 ft. I would say if your Commando can make it with its live axle in both powder and heavy wet stuff a Defender should do as well. Otherwise I am currently ignorant when it comes to anything deeper than about 6 inches. The unasked question is would I do it again? You bet! Out of the box the Defender beats everything else (with only some very specific exceptions for the HUMMER) off-road. It is a unique and very capable machine designed with a single purpose in mind. It may have visible spot welds and such but these just further increase its charm (seems hardly the appropriate word!). I look at the Defender as another addition to the Land Rover tradition. Treading Lightly... Stephen O'Hearn '94 Defender 90 ------------------------------[ <- Message 17 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 940924 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 1994 23:15:15 -0700 From: Roger Sinasohn <sinasohn@crl.com> Subject: Re: Diesel Landrovers In regards to your comments on diesel engines... Do these drawbacks also apply to the tdi engines? Thanks in advance. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Uncle Roger "There is pleasure pure in being mad sinasohn@crl.com that none but madmen know." Roger Louis Sinasohn & Associates San Francisco, California ------------------------------[ <- Message 18 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 940924 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 1994 23:15:27 -0700 From: Roger Sinasohn <sinasohn@crl.com> Subject: Re: Splitting LRO List > I am opposed to splitting the list. I like it the way it is and feel that > the new-to-Land-Rovers Discovery owners and such like will be more likely to [ truncated by lro-digester (was 16 lines)] > [ Net-Rovers leave a trail of mud & oil on the information superhighway! ] > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Well said! I agree completely. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Uncle Roger "There is pleasure pure in being mad sinasohn@crl.com that none but madmen know." Roger Louis Sinasohn & Associates San Francisco, California ------------------------------[ <- Message 19 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 940924 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 1994 23:15:24 -0700 From: Roger Sinasohn <sinasohn@crl.com> Subject: Re: Desert Protection > Regarding concerns that, if the Park Service gets ahold of the desert, it > will ruin it like it ruined Yosemite. Where does this come from? I am a [ truncated by lro-digester (was 8 lines)] > feel that the Park Service has done a really creditable job of preserving > the resource while making it available to a large number of people. I must admit that I do generally stay away from the Valley due to the huge numbers of people there, but that's not the fault of the park service -- it's part of the problem of overpopulation. I would hate to think what it would be like if it *weren't* controlled by the park service. > I feel that it is unrealistic to try to hold onto the past, to maintain the > status quo. Our population is exploding, our resources are dwindling, and [ truncated by lro-digester (was 10 lines)] > well-educated young couples seem to have no compunctions about having as > many children as they want. We can have hordes of people show up with the park service keeping an eye on preserving the place, or we can have hordes of people show up in their shiny new 4x4 Ford Explorers tossing beer cans out the window at every turn. > Every freedom carries a heavy price of responsibility. I think most > Land-Rover owners are highly responsible citizens but that far too many [ truncated by lro-digester (was 13 lines)] > [ e-mail to: mcdpw@pacific.pacific.net Phone: (707) 485-7220 ] > [ Net-Rovers leave a trail of mud & oil on the information superhighway! ] > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Uncle Roger "There is pleasure pure in being mad sinasohn@crl.com that none but madmen know." Roger Louis Sinasohn & Associates San Francisco, California ------------------------------[ <- Message 20 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 940924 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
END OF LAND ROVER OWNER DIGEST Browser -> ]
Back | Forward | |
---|---|---|
Photos & text Copyright 1990-2011 Bill Caloccia, All rights reserved. Digest Messages Copyright 1990-2011 by the original poster or/and Bill Caloccia, All rights reserved.
|