[ First Message Last | Table of Contents | <- Digest -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
msg | Sender | lines | Subject |
1 | "Jurgen Klus" [PSJK@psy1 | 26 | Coming Over! |
2 | Mike Rooth [M.J.Rooth@lu | 38 | Diesel Landrovers |
3 | mcdpw@pacific.pacific.ne | 52 | Desert Protection |
4 | Russell Burns [burns@cis | 26 | Range Rover springs |
5 | mcdpw@pacific.pacific.ne | 74 | Scotty conversions |
6 | mcdpw@pacific.pacific.ne | 21 | Splitting LRO List |
7 | Benjamin Allan Smith [ra | 48 | [not specified] |
8 | Fred Heald [justfred@net | 63 | Every journey is an adventure (fwd) |
9 | Craig Murray [craigp@ocs | 20 | Why to Land Rover stuff Plastered all over the office! |
From: "Jurgen Klus" <PSJK@psy1.ssn.flinders.edu.au> Date: Thu, 22 Sep 1994 16:30:21 GMT-0930 Subject: Coming Over! Hi. I've just "found" this superb mailing list. Just quickly, I've got a V8i Discovery 3.5ltr. (I guess that qualifies me!) Question1. I'll be visiting USA early October (Ft Lauderdale) and then New York (after a brief visit with my brother in London) - is there anyone out there from either of the US areas? Question 2. I may wish to purchase the odd bit e.g. a Thomas air compressor for the tyres. Does anyone know of a 4WD equipment supplier that has good prices in either Fl or N.Y.? These compressors are very expensive in Australia, about $300+, and as they are made in the US, the preice should be better. The Disco is a good off-road vehicle, in the Land Rover tradition. Unfortunately, they have a lot of little, inexcusable problems which you need to sort out after delivery! I'll leave it at that. Jurgen Klus Tel 618 201 2413 Fax 618 201 3877 When the going gets tough..the tough get Land Rover! ------------------------------[ <- Message 2 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 940923 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Mike Rooth <M.J.Rooth@lut.ac.uk> Subject: Diesel Landrovers Date: Thu, 22 Sep 94 17:03:03 BST I agree with Paul.My 1970 2.25 88" shows all the aforementioned characteristics,with the exception of startling fuel economy(How do you do it Paul?).I reckon on about 20-23mpg. The diesel has *some* disadvantages,however.Spares are generally that bit more expensive.In the case of the starter motor,MUCH more expensive.Injectors have to be serviced by other people,I doubt you could ever do them yourself.Noise,and the lack of top speed has already been noted.A valve stuck open is immediately fatal,where on the petrol it isnt,necessarily.I speak from experience,there:-(( Wet weather performance....well,any amount of rain wont stop you, but cold weather starting *can* be a stressfull experience,particularly with the standard series wired heater plugs working on trade union principles(one out,all out).Help *is* at hand with that one,though, a set of aftermarket parallel wored heater plugs,with fitting instructions is available at about twenty five quid.And in winter,you should treat a half full tank as though it is empty otherwise the fuel will tend to wax up.Having said that,though,I've had no trouble in the eight years of ownership,even though I have been known to ignore that particular rule. The expensive items to replace are:-Starter motor,injectors,distributor pump.The latter two you generally get overhauled unless you are *very* unlucky.Other engine items are slightly more expensive than the petrol versions,but not prohibitively so.Front springs cost more(leafers only), simply because they have more leaves to take the extra weight.Running out of fuel can be fun,due to the necessity of bleeding the fuel system when you put some more in. The advantages are,lots of low down "grunt",long life(given Paul's simple precautions),mechanical cruise control,otherwise known as a hand throttle, an easy engine to work on,better fuel economy,and that superior feeling you get when driving along and you smell petrol,and you *know* it isnt you. Go for it!Diesels are great! Cheers Mike Rooth ------------------------------[ <- Message 3 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 940923 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 1994 10:26:37 -0700 From: mcdpw@pacific.pacific.net (Granville Pool) Subject: Desert Protection Well, I tried to resist but am going to put in my 1.3 pence worth, regarding the call for antagonists to the desert protection bill... On the whole, I agree with Uncle Roger and with Walt Swain, both of whom said it well. On the other hand, I do realize that the Land-Rover desert addicts are a special breed, very much steeped in the Tread Lightly! philosophy, long before it got a name. Guys like John Kirn, who used to have, lettered on the glass of his rear door: "The silence of the desert is like no other sound... listen." And Marvin Matson, writing in the fall issue of the _Aluminum_Workhorse_, gave an intelligent view of issues involved in making the desert more "accessible" to the general (non-off-roader) public. He did not mention the pending legislation, just described a trip through the Black Rock Desert and the Emmigrant Trail with some BLM pukes and maybe some other federales. Regarding concerns that, if the Park Service gets ahold of the desert, it will ruin it like it ruined Yosemite. Where does this come from? I am a long-time devotee of Yosemite and my wife a much longer-time one. We met working up there (I used to do the fire fall). We have seen Yosemite when it was still relatively uncrowded, seen what it became like at its most crowded, and what the Park Service did to deal with the situation. And we feel that the Park Service has done a really creditable job of preserving the resource while making it available to a large number of people. I feel that it is unrealistic to try to hold onto the past, to maintain the status quo. Our population is exploding, our resources are dwindling, and off-road vehicles are proliferating at a staggering rate. The desert is an extremely fragile biome. If we want to preserve access, to the extent that it can still be done, we must be active in the Tread Lightly education programs and we must do something about population growth. There are, in my view, already far too many people and yet a lot of even relatively well-educated young couples seem to have no compunctions about having as many children as they want. Every freedom carries a heavy price of responsibility. I think most Land-Rover owners are highly responsible citizens but that far too many others are not. Too many think freedom means being able to do whatever you want. That attitude is precisely what is costing us all our freedoms. Education is the key but, even with the best efforts, the effects are very slow to be realized. Sorry, I kinda got carried away! ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ [ Granville Pool (Redwood Valley, CA) L-Rs: 4-88" 1-80" + Austin Champ 4x4] [ e-mail to: mcdpw@pacific.pacific.net Phone: (707) 485-7220 ] [ Net-Rovers leave a trail of mud & oil on the information superhighway! ] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ------------------------------[ <- Message 4 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 940923 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Russell Burns <burns@cisco.com> Subject: Range Rover springs Date: Thu, 22 Sep 94 11:26:31 PDT During my last offroad adventure, I noticed that I was reshaping my gas tank everytime I went down a large ledge. Since I tread lightly, and don't travel lightly, my thought on the problem was to get some heavy duty springs for the beast. The main use for the truck is to pull a 3500lb pop-up camper, and off-road exploring. When traveling my cargo weight including passengers is from 650 to 750lbs depending on how much yuppie water I have in the cooler, plus 270lbs hitch weight when pulling the trailer. The self leveling unit is still working, and this helps when pulling the trailer, but during slow rock crawling it seems to be next to useless. I was thinking that maybe some defender, or discovery springs might keep the truck from bottoming out on the ledges. Any recommendations ??? Thanks Russ Burns see ya in Virginia ------------------------------[ <- Message 5 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 940923 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 1994 12:36:01 -0700 From: mcdpw@pacific.pacific.net (Granville Pool) Subject: Scotty conversions I have not personally undertaken one of these conversions (although I have often considered it). However, I once owned a '67 109 SW which had a Chev 235 l-6 in it and can attest the the joy of the performance (without noticing any particular penalty in fuel economy compared with what I have heard with the Land-Rover f-head 2.6l 6-cyl). That one was not a Scotty conversion, however. Also, I know a fellow in my town who put a Scotty conversion in a '68 109" SW (which had had a Land-Rover 6 in it) with a Chev 250 l-6. He did a very sanitary factory-looking job of the conversion. He did, however, find that Scotty's instructions, both in the scanty documentation provided with the "kit" and over the phone, were somewhat sparce. I called, today, and talked to him about the conversion. He said that the kit, as far as it went, was well made. However, his recollection was that he had to find a certain type of Chevy flywheel and then have it machined to work (remove about 3/8" thickness to allow the clutch room to engage properly, i.e., not slip) and that he also used a Chevy 9" clutch disk and pressure plate (cover). He found that clutch to be sort of marginal for that engine. It occured to me that his problems might be unique to a conversion to a gearbox which was originally fitted to an f-head (6-cylinder or Series I 4-cyl) Land-Rover engine, due the the narrower bell housing used for those engines. If that were the only reason for the problems, you could perhaps solve them by changing the bell housing to one for a 2.25 liter four cylinder Land-Rover. He also mentioned the difficulty of working out all the details of cooling the engine properly and felt that a custom shroud for the radiator was needed. I have heard from others with American sixes and V-8s in Land-Rovers that cooling is a persistent problem. Another problem with fitting most V-6s and V-8s is room for the exhaust next to the steering box. The solution to that one, apparently, is to modify the bracket holding the main steering box to angle outward (into the wheel well), a little, to move the box away from the engine. This modification was used by the Land-Rover dealer in Willits, CA, Carbry Motors, which did quite a few V-8 transplants into Land-Rovers, years back(but the conversion pieces were made by someone in S.F., not by Scotty). A conversion which I have strongly considered is the 4.0-liter V-6 used in the Ford Explorer, as it is a 60-degree vee, rather than the 90-degree vee of most V-6s and certainly has enough power and torque for a Land-Rover 88. It would fit in well, as it is quite compact. Also, 60 degrees is the natural balance angle for a V-6 and so tends to be quite smooth. My understanding is that that particular Ford V-6 is made in Germany. I noticed in another one of yesterday's postings, from Greg Hiner in Australia, of other adapters available for the Land-Rover (available in the U.S. from Advance Adapters). One of them purports to mate Ford C4 or C10 automatic gearboxes to the Land-Rover transfer case. I don't know if this would work for the Explorer V-6 or not, but intend to find out. I feel that there would be two major advantages to the auto box (three counting my wife liking it better): 1)better crawling ability off-road (now favored by many off-road racers) and 2)less strain on the Land-Rover-not-made-to-take-all-that-extra-torque drivetrain. In that latter vein, I feel that converting to full-time four-wheel drive would be better, too. In that connection, there may be a low-cost ($400+/-) add-on viscous coupling available from Mile Marker (who make Selectro Hubs) in Florida. Whether or not they have one which would work probably depends upon what engine is fitted and how much torque it has. I also understand that such a conversion would require modification of the Land-Rover front axle to add CV joints in place of the u-joints. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ [ Granville Pool (Redwood Valley, CA) L-Rs: 4-88" 1-80" + Austin Champ 4x4] [ e-mail to: mcdpw@pacific.pacific.net Phone: (707) 485-7220 ] [ Net-Rovers leave a trail of mud & oil on the information superhighway! ] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ------------------------------[ <- Message 6 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 940923 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 1994 12:36:29 -0700 From: mcdpw@pacific.pacific.net (Granville Pool) Subject: Splitting LRO List I am opposed to splitting the list. I like it the way it is and feel that the new-to-Land-Rovers Discovery owners and such like will be more likely to become "of us" if they are welcomed into our fold, if we will be patient with their simple questions. We can answer them and help these folks gain the aficion which has taken us all these years to acquire. Is it so hard to share a little? This list is valuable (beyond measure) to us all-too-isolated-for-too-many-years Land-Rover old-timers, for sharing higher-level technical advice and experiences; imagine, then, how valuable our knowledge can be to the new-comers. The net gives us a lot; it's our responsibility to give back. I think that that is what the Internet is all about. Thanks. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ [ Granville Pool (Redwood Valley, CA) L-Rs: 4-88" 1-80" + Austin Champ 4x4] [ e-mail to: mcdpw@pacific.pacific.net Phone: (707) 485-7220 ] [ Net-Rovers leave a trail of mud & oil on the information superhighway! ] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ------------------------------[ <- Message 7 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 940923 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Subject: Starter Motor;Half Baked Ideas Date: Thu, 22 Sep 1994 22:26:06 -0700 From: Benjamin Allan Smith <ranger@ugcs.caltech.edu> Now that Dixon has a copy of the picture of my Land Rover stuck, I'll never live it down. Anyway, getting stuck did have some consequences. Like my clutch rusting to the flywheel. The other problem that developed was the starter motor. Sometimes it worked, sometimes it just gave a click and did nothing. Finally it gaveup all together. So I crawled underneath and found that the stud that the hot lead is attached to was stripped. Out came the starter motor. We found that the thread on that stud was 1/4 inch 26 threads per inch. I have nut 1/4 24 and 1/4 28 but no 26. (Neither did the local hardware stores. So Dad and I rethreaded the stud for 1/4 24. We just ran the die on. Then we got a piece of brass pipefitting. We took off the threads with a metal lathe. And tapped it for 1/4 24. We figured that if we could make a nut that had 1cm of thread, it would have more threads than an ordinary nut and would be as likely to strip the newly (and poorly) rethreaded stud. (We considered replacing the stud, but realized that it was a solder joint and it would be really annoying to resolder the thing on. So I popped the starter motor in and nothing happened. Gee I fix one thing and miss the real problem. Out comes the starter motor. We check just about everything that we could, except the armature. The bushings weren't great. So we hooked it up to a battery with jumper cables. (Really big sparks!) The starter turned over jerkily and slowly. Not fast enough to throw the bendix gear out. Dad theorized that since the bushings we worn, maybe the motor was hitting some vibrational resonance that was doing this. So off we went on a quest for new bushing. We found a shop that rebuilt starter motors. While looking for a bushing, they took the armature and put it on a growler. They pronounced the armature dead, and they didn't have one the right size. So Dad says, the starter motor was underwater for awhile. Maybe it's still wet. Let's put it in the oven for awhile. This seemed like a half baked idea to me. We put it in the oven, on bake at 190 degrees F for an hour or so. After it cooled I put it together. And it works!?! Don't ask me why, but baking the armature fixed it. I still don't trust it (I'm carrying me crank at all times), but it seems to work. -Benjamin Smith ranger@ugcs.caltech.edu 1972 Land Rover Series III 88 ------------------------------[ <- Message 8 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 940923 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 1994 22:44:58 -0700 (PDT) From: Fred Heald <justfred@netcom.com> Subject: Every journey is an adventure (fwd) Thought I'd share this little adventure, on my return to LA from a sales trip to Denver. So I got to airport security in Denver this afternoon, and realised I'd left my keys in my tool bag on Sunday morning when I went through security at LAX; but this afternoon in the confusion of tearing down the booth, I accidentally packed the bag in with my computer which Rick is driving back here (he'll be back on Monday). No problem, I called the Rover shop and got directions on how to hot-wire the Rover - wire the battery to the coil charge lead. (The 109 has a button starter.) However, when I got to WallyPark and found some wire and stripped it and attached it, no start. Okay, second line of attack - I removed the dashboard (easy enough) and fiddled around with the wires until I got the ignition to come on when I turned on the parking lights. Drove to a gas station (did I mention I ran out of gas on the way to the airport on Sunday? In front of a gas station, and with a gas bottle, fortunately - I really ought to fix the gas gauge) I noticed a few drips of oil on my floor. As I drove off, it turned into a puddle of oil, then a stream, then a gusher, coming out from behind the (partially disassembled) dash. I pulled over, and found I'd creased the oil line going to the oil pressure gauge - so it was spurting hot oil at pressure right out of the cable. Tape didn't seem to do a thing, so I yanked the cable out into the engine compartment (careful not to leave it over the exhaust pipe). Found in my bag the only tool you really need: THE VICE GRIPS! ...and clamped them on the end of the cable. After a few unsuccessful clamp/crimps I left the vicegrips on the cable, and the oil stopped! I filled the oil back up (about 2 quarts were all over the dash, the floor, the seats, my pants, the road behind be), and made it home (about 1/2 an hour from Fairfax/10 to Pasadena on surface streets). Moral of the story: Always carry vice grips. Conclusion: If you lose your keys, old Land Rovers are great because you can hot wire the ignition switch, easily. But they're bad because you might screw something up in that rat's nest behind the dash. But they're good because you can get oil all over the passenger compartment and it doesn't screw things up too much (I like to think of it as adding character). But they're bad because in a new car things wouldn't break. But they're good because in a new car if things break you wouldn't be able to field-repair them... Nyah. The conclusion is, don't lose your keys. Fred Heald justfred@netcom.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The opinions and ideas expressed here represent those of everyone involved, including but not limited to myself, my boss, family, friends, enemies, casual acquaintences, and of course the reader. "...when a far out message makes itself hackneyed, somehow it seems to become a clever ironic commentary of the condition of man." -Jay 'Spunky' Fisher ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------[ <- Message 9 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 940923 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Craig Murray <craigp@ocs.cpsg.com.au> Subject: Why to Land Rover stuff Plastered all over the office! Date: Fri, 23 Sep 94 16:43:18 EST Hi all, Just found a reason to have Land Rover stuff plastered all over the office! I had to call DEC to make a support call for a PC, turns out that the engineer has had two Land Rovers! And I would never had known if I didn't have stuff plastered all over the office and on the PC (Thanks to Jeff Berg) Thought that I would tell you all! -- ============================================================================== Craig Murray 1955 Series 1 86" LROC of Victoria Australia 2.25 diesel (Nearly!) email: craigp@ocs.cpsg.com.au (Currently on Digest Mode) ------------------------------[ <- Message 10 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 940923 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
END OF LAND ROVER OWNER DIGEST Browser -> ]
Back | Forward | |
---|---|---|
Photos & text Copyright 1990-2011 Bill Caloccia, All rights reserved. Digest Messages Copyright 1990-2011 by the original poster or/and Bill Caloccia, All rights reserved.
|