Re: [lro] bad stuff

From: David Scheidt (dmschei@attglobal.net)
Date: Fri Feb 06 2004 - 12:15:15 EST

  • Next message: Mark Love: "Re: [lro] bad stuff"

    On Feb 6, 2004, at 7:36 AM, Alan J. Richer wrote:

    >
    >
    > --- Robert MacCormick <Robert.MacCormick@olin.edu> wrote:
    >>
    >> I use a computer to set things diagnose problems and
    >> reset codes.....How
    >> soon will I pludding the silly thing into macafee or some
    >> other such
    >> thing for updates....
    >
    > Considering the average ECU doesn't have any real IO
    > routines for executable code, not for the present, I'd
    > think. If it's got no place to accept programming or a way
    > to execute code, then it's immune.
    >
    > Car computers are relatively stupid, simgle-purpose devices
    > that are nowhere near as flexible as a general purpose
    > computing device - and they should be kept that way. If you
    > must have this electrickery keep it to the KISS principle.
    >
    > It's bad enough my RR has ABS and the EFI....but we've been
    > down this path before again and again and again...8*)
    >
    > ajr
    >
    > =====
    > The journey is the destination. Anything else is illusion.
    >
    > Please ignore the following advertising.....
    >
    > __________________________________
    > Do you Yahoo!?
    > Yahoo! Finance: Get your refund fast by filing online.
    > http://taxes.yahoo.com/filing.html
    > _______________________________________________
    > LRO mailing list
    > LRO@land-rover.team.net
    > http://land-rover.team.net/mailman/listinfo/lro
    >

    _______________________________________________
    LRO mailing list
    LRO@land-rover.team.net
    http://land-rover.team.net/mailman/listinfo/lro



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Feb 06 2004 - 12:08:20 EST