Re: Re: [lro] Overbore 2.25?

From: bfishel@cisnet.com
Date: Sat Mar 29 2003 - 00:18:26 EST

  • Next message: jimfoo: "Re: [lro] Overbore 2.25?"

    I agree that its not worth going 60 if 40 will work. 40 over wouldn't clean
    up the bore though.
    I don't know if mine is any improvement or the ones I;ve compared to were
    in need of a rebuild themself.
    Bill Fishel
    >
    > > My Rovers been running on a RN engine that is .060 over for maybe 10 or
    > > more years. .060 pistons and rings are hard to find however.
    >
    > They're probably easier to find here. Not sure it's worth the extra
    trouble
    > though when I can get a set of new +40 inc rings for US$260. There's only
    > 25cc difference between +40 and +60
    >
    > So how does it compare to a stock 2.25? Noticeable increase?
    >
    > Matt.
    > Sydney Australia
    > '75 Series III 88
    > _______________________________________________
    > LRO mailing list
    > LRO@land-rover.team.net
    > http://land-rover.team.net/mailman/listinfo/lro
    _______________________________________________
    LRO mailing list
    LRO@land-rover.team.net
    http://land-rover.team.net/mailman/listinfo/lro



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Mar 29 2003 - 01:55:12 EST